R Systems International Ltd
RSYSTEMSR Systems International Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +41.8% in a year against a −46.5% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +41.8% against a −46.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (42 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 20th percentile of its own 11-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit −26.3% year on year, and 146% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
R Systems International Ltd trades at ₹240, in a downtrend and 42 weeks into that stage. That is −17.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 10% of a 52-week range of ₹220 to ₹428. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (57 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 42 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹240 it trades −17.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 10% of its 52-week range (₹220–₹428).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +283% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (57 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-09-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
R Systems International Ltd trades at 13.5× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 20% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 19.1×, measured across 10.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 13.5× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 20% of the time, against a long-run median of 19.1× measured over 10.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +41.8% against a −46.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +3.8%/yr price move, ~+10.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−6.8 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +14.3%/yr price move, ~+15.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−0.7 pp from the multiple (roughly flat). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, R Systems International Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 5.2% a year. Profit itself has compounded 14.7% a year over the past 9 years. Today the market pays 13.5× P/E, the 20th percentile of its own 11-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is low against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is below what this company has actually delivered.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: Topping out Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
R Systems International Ltd reads as topping out on its fundamental arc. Topping out — profit and EPS growth have decelerated hard (profit growth +42.0% at its peak → −1.0% latest) while ROCE still reads 24.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: decelerating from a peak is where good stories quietly end — the multiple usually notices late.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +12.4% | +8.9% | +19.3% | +12.5% |
| Profit | +42.0% | +9.9% | +26.2% | +6.6% |
| EPS | +41.8% | +10.0% | +26.5% | +7.4% |
| Share price | −46.5% | −22.8% | +3.8% | +14.3% |
4-Factor Sector Score
57.5/100 — rank 18 of 64 in IT - Software · 100% evidence confidence
R Systems International Ltd scores 57.5 out of 100 against the 64 companies it is compared with in IT - Software, ranking 18. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.9 + 16.5 + 17.7 + 4.4 = 57.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
R Systems International Ltd reported ₹602 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +30.3% year on year. That is the 7th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 9 years it has compounded at 14.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹1,958 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,231 Cr.
FY25 revenue came in at ₹1,958 Cr (+12.4% on the year), capping 9 years at 14.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹602 Cr, +30.3% year on year — the 7th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +24.1% growth against the decade's 14.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +24.2% over the last 4 quarters against +13.8%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit −1.0% vs +16.3%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
R Systems International Ltd's operating margin is 18.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +3.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.0% to 16.0%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 18.0%, +3.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.0%–16.0%, and FY25's 16.0% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +3.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
R Systems International Ltd earned ₹56.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −26.3% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹186 Cr. The 9-year compound rate is 14.7%. That is 9.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹76.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹56.0 Cr, −26.3% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹186 Cr (+42.0%), and the 9-year compound rate is 14.7%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +30.3% and the margin +3.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +5.0% vs revenue +24.1%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 146% of R Systems International Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was ₹220 Cr of operating cash against ₹186 Cr of profit. After ₹616 Cr of capital spending, ₹−396 Cr was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of ₹220 Cr against reported profit of ₹186 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−396 Cr after ₹616 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 146% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 146%: the cash cycle stretched 23 days between FY20 and FY25 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 6.2× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
R Systems International Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 77 days in FY25, up from 54 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹1,151 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹1,958 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹5.4 Cr, so roughly ₹413 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY25: debtors at 77 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 77 days, looser than FY20's 54.
In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹1,958 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹5.4 Cr — so the 77-day loop keeps roughly ₹413 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,151 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹185 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
R Systems International Ltd earns a ROCE of 19% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 13% in FY17. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +5.3 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 9.5% net margin on 0.93× asset turns.
FY25 ROCE is 19%, recovered from a FY17 trough of 13% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 9.5% net margin × 0.93× asset turns × 2.65× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 23.4% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 17.3% − 12.0% = a +5.3 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
R Systems International Ltd carries total debt of ₹410 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,225 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.33. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.11 in FY22 to 0.33 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹410 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,225 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.33. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.11 (FY22) to 0.33 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions added 4.8 points of R Systems International Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 6.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +3.4 points over the same window, to 3.8%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: +4.8 points over 8 quarters to 6.5%; Foreign institutions: +3.4 points over 8 quarters to 3.8%; Promoters: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 51.9%.
Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (+4.8 points), alongside foreign institutions (+3.4 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
R Systems International Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Coforge LtdCOFORGE | 76.3/100Favorable setup100% evidence | LEADER | 30.0/35 Revenue 35.7% · PAT 66.5% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 23.5% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 42.7× · PEG 0.57 100% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 13.3% · RS bench 20.1% · 1Y 11.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30 + 15.6 + 12.3 + 18.4 = 76.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Silver Touch Technologies LtdSILVERTUC | 70.0/100Favorable setup93% evidence | FADING | 30.2/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT 86.4% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence | 17.4/25 ROCE 29.8% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 46.4× · PEG 1.11 65% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench 14.1% · 1Y 120.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.2 + 17.4 + 10.3 + 12.1 = 70 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Sahana Systems LtdSAHANA | 68.7/100Favorable setup70% evidence | TURNING | 21.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 39.8% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 13.4/20 P/E 14.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y -24.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 19.9 + 13.4 + 13.9 = 68.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4ASM Technologies Ltd526433 | 68.2/100Favorable setup69% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 27.9/35 Revenue 67.8% · PAT 89.5% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 27% · OPM 23% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 138× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 5.7% · RS bench 97.1% · 1Y 94%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.9 + 16.1 + 8.6 + 15.6 = 68.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5NINtec Systems LtdNINSYS | 65.0/100Favorable setup80% evidence | FADING | 20.0/35 Revenue 21.6% · PAT 18.8% · OPM change 4.2 pp 95% evidence | 21.9/25 ROCE 54% · OPM 25.9% 95% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 39.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 29.6% · RS bench 37.6% · 1Y 57.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 21.9 + 9.3 + 13.8 = 65 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6String Metaverse Ltd534535 | 63.4/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | BASING | 27.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 41.6% · OPM 11% 76% evidence | 14.8/20 P/E 8.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -48% · RS bench -35.6% · 1Y -70.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.2 + 15.7 + 14.8 + 5.7 = 63.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -48% and the one-year return is -70.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 7Cigniti Technologies LtdCIGNITITEC | 63.3/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | 23.4/35 Revenue 14% · PAT 96.1% · OPM change 2 pp 56% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 34.1% · OPM 18% 75% evidence | 16.2/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG 0.61 100% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -15% · 1Y -19.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-17 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 16.2 + 16.2 + 7.5 = 63.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Tech Mahindra LtdTECHM | 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.1/35 Revenue 10.9% · PAT 14.3% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 16.3/25 ROCE 23.1% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG 0.76 100% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 14.8% · RS bench 4% · 1Y 4.3%8 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 16.3 + 10.6 + 15.2 = 63.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9TAC Infosec LtdTAC | 63.0/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 25.6/35 Revenue 76.4% · PAT 59.4% · OPM change 1.6 pp 71% evidence | 20.9/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 48.2% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 35.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -15.4% · 1Y -14.4%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.6 + 20.9 + 9.5 + 7 = 63 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Sasken Technologies LtdSASKEN | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | FADING | 30.7/35 Revenue 67.8% · PAT 67.4% · OPM change 4 pp 100% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 9.9% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 36.7× · PEG 0.68 100% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 9.5% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 25%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.7 + 8.1 + 10.4 + 12.4 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Softtech Engineers LtdSOFTTECH | 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 25.2/35 Revenue 35.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.1 pp 95% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 6.2% · OPM 27.2% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 124× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 19.9% · RS bench 27.6% · 1Y 13.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.2 + 12.1 + 8.7 + 14.8 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Datamatics Global Services LtdDATAMATICS | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue 13.1% · PAT 1.9% · OPM change 4 pp 100% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 17.7× · PEG 0.69 100% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 9.6% · RS bench -3.3% · 1Y -21.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 15.9 + 10.6 + 13.2 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13IZMO LtdIZMO | 60.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | FADING | 24.1/35 Revenue 24.7% · PAT 10.2% · OPM change 8 pp 95% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 25% 95% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 25.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 29% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y 20.9%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 14.2 + 6.6 + 15.7 = 60.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Danlaw Technologies India Ltd532329 | 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | TURNING | 21.8/35 Revenue 24.1% · PAT 34.5% · OPM change 0.8 pp 95% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 27.6% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 93% · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 15.5 + 10.2 + 12.4 = 59.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Expleo Solutions LtdEXPLEOSOL | 59.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 20.9/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 39.4% · OPM change 4 pp 95% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 24.2% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector -13.3% · RS bench 1.4% · 1Y -12.8%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 15.8 + 13.7 + 9.2 = 59.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Hypersoft Technologies Ltd539724 | 59.6/100Mixed-positive evidence67% evidence | FADING | 25.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.9 pp 71% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 20.6% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 386× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 40.8% · RS bench 50.5% · 1Y 116.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.5 + 11.9 + 8.6 + 13.6 = 59.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17InfoBeans Technologies LtdINFOBEAN | 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.5/35 Revenue 35.5% · PAT 60.4% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 10.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.5 + 16.9 + 9.7 + 5.8 = 58.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -12.9% and the one-year return is 10.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 18R Systems International Ltdthis pageRSYSTEMS | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BASING | 18.9/35 Revenue 24.1% · PAT -1% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 19.5% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 17.7/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG 0.26 100% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -28.2% · RS bench -23.7% · 1Y -46.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 16.5 + 17.7 + 4.4 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Ksolves India LtdKSOLVES | 57.3/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.8/35 Revenue 16% · PAT 16.7% · OPM change 3.9 pp 95% evidence | 20.7/25 ROCE 131% · OPM 30.3% 95% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 16.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -16.6% · RS bench -10.9% · 1Y -19.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 20.7 + 13.8 + 5 = 57.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20BLS E-Services LtdBLSE | 56.8/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 18.1/35 Revenue 71.2% · PAT 9.4% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 16.4% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 48.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 41.8% · RS bench 50.4% · 1Y 75.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 10.3 + 9 + 19.4 = 56.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Subex LtdSUBEXLTD | 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.4/35 Revenue 2.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 95% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM 19% 95% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 80.4% · 1Y —9 of 9 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 10.3 + 9.4 + 12.4 = 56.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Saksoft LtdSAKSOFT | 55.7/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.9/35 Revenue 8.2% · PAT 13% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 25.5% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 14.5× · PEG 0.6 100% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench -10.8% · 1Y -30.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 15.6 + 13.5 + 8.7 = 55.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Infosys LtdINFY | 55.1/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 11.2% · PAT 11.1% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 40% · OPM 24% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -26.2% · RS bench -21.2% · 1Y -28.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 20.1 + 14 + 2.9 = 55.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24LTM LtdLTM | 54.4/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.1/35 Revenue 13.9% · PAT 10% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 29.6% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG 1.18 100% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -17.1% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y -17.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 17.9 + 10.7 + 8.7 = 54.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25AvenuesAI LtdCCAVENUE | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 43.8% · OPM change -2.3 pp 100% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 3.7% 100% evidence | 14.8/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG 0.37 65% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector -4.7% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y 0.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 5 + 14.8 + 12.9 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Xchanging Solutions LtdXCHANGING | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 13.2% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 18% · OPM 34% 95% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 11.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -24.4% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y -30.2%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 15.5 + 13.6 + 5.9 = 53.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Blue Cloud Softech Solutions LtdBLUECLOUDS | 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | 22.0/35 Revenue 41.1% · PAT 36.2% · OPM change 10 pp 95% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 14.2% · OPM 20% 95% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 27.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -8.7% · 1Y -33.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22 + 12.4 + 9.6 + 9 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28TechNVision Ventures LtdTECHNVISN | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.9/35 Revenue 23.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.9 pp 95% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 5.2% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1002× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 32.1% · RS bench -14% · 1Y -20.6%0 of 9 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.9 + 5.5 + 8.5 + 13 = 52.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Seshaasai Technologies LtdSTYL | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.6/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT 20.6% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 27.7% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 23.7× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -9.1%10 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 17.1 + 12.6 + 10 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30Tanla Platforms LtdTANLA | 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.4/35 Revenue 13.2% · PAT 9.9% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 26.3% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 12.5× · PEG 1.21 100% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -12% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y -23.7%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 16.5 + 13.1 + 8.2 = 52.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 31Tata Consultancy Services LtdTCS | 50.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | TURNING | 10.0/35 Revenue 7.7% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 22.5/25 ROCE 63% · OPM 26% 100% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 14.8× · PEG 1.85 100% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -16.2% · 1Y -27.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 22.5 + 11.9 + 6.2 = 50.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 32Capillary Technologies India LtdCAPILLARY | 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 27.4/35 Revenue 27.8% · PAT 135.8% · OPM change 5.8 pp 100% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 15.7% 100% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 71.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.4 + 4.1 + 8.9 + 10 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 33RNIT AI Solutions LtdAUTOPALIND | 50.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.9/35 Revenue 56.7% · PAT 71.3% · OPM change -0.6 pp 95% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 20.2% · OPM 35.3% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 68× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 14.6 + 8.9 + 10 = 50.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Birlasoft LtdBSOFT | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.7/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT 21.1% · OPM change 4 pp 100% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 21.2% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 14.6/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG 0.62 100% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -26% · RS bench -20.6% · 1Y -25%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 13 + 14.6 + 3 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 35Mphasis LtdMPHASIS | 49.0/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | FADING | 15.0/35 Revenue 13.7% · PAT 9.9% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 22.1% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 6.0/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG 2.19 100% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench -7% · 1Y -18%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15 + 17.3 + 6 + 10.7 = 49 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 36Hexaware Technologies LtdHEXT | 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | FADING | 14.2/35 Revenue 13% · PAT 1.2% · OPM change 4 pp 100% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 21.4× · PEG 0.81 100% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -21.4% · RS bench -14.7% · 1Y -31.1%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 17.8 + 10.7 + 6.2 = 48.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 37HCL Technologies LtdHCLTECH | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.2/35 Revenue 12.6% · PAT 2.6% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 30.4% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 18× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -18.3% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -15%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 19 + 9 + 8 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 38Mastek LtdMASTEK | 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | FADING | 13.8/35 Revenue 6% · PAT 5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 17.7% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -16.4% · RS bench -11.1% · 1Y -33.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.8 + 13.3 + 12.6 + 8.2 = 47.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 39Dynacons Systems & Solutions LtdDSSL | 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue 10.5% · PAT 16.2% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 29.8% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 15.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -7% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y 9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 15.4 + 8.1 + 6.9 = 47.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 40Zensar Technologies LtdZENSARTECH | 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue 8% · PAT 15.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 22.8% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG 1.11 100% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -33% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y -45.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 13.6 + 14.3 + 3.1 = 46.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 41Unicommerce eSolutions LtdUNIECOM | 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.4/35 Revenue 38.4% · PAT 18.1% · OPM change -8.1 pp 95% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 21.1% · OPM 10.6% 95% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -44.1%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 16.5 + 9.1 + 6.6 = 46.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 42XT Global Infotech LtdXTGLOBAL | 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | 18.4/35 Revenue 85.4% · PAT 29.4% · OPM change -6.6 pp 53% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 9.5% 71% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 40.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -1% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -21.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.4 + 9.1 + 9.6 = 46.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 43Wipro LtdWIPRO | 45.0/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BASING | 12.9/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT -1.7% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 17.8% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 12.5× · PEG 1.4 100% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -25.8% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y -31.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 15.3 + 13.5 + 3.3 = 45 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 44Excelsoft Technologies LtdEXCELSOFT | 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | TURNING | 12.0/35 Revenue 26.8% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change -1.8 pp 95% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 16.3% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12 + 12.2 + 10.1 + 10 = 44.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 45Sonata Software LtdSONATSOFTW | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 9.0/35 Revenue 4% · PAT 7.9% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 30.7% · OPM 5% 100% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 0.81 100% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -12.1% · 1Y -25.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9 + 13.6 + 13.1 + 7.4 = 43.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 4663 Moons Technologies Ltd63MOONS | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 128 pp 71% evidence | 3.4/25 ROCE -3.7% · OPM -52% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -22.4% · RS bench 28.9% · 1Y -1.6%10 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 3.4 + 10 + 9.1 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 47Magellanic Cloud LtdMCLOUD | 38.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 9.6/35 Revenue 13.7% · PAT 6.7% · OPM change -7 pp 95% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 19.8% · OPM 28% 95% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 13.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -54.4% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -68%6 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 13.9 + 11.9 + 3.5 = 38.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 48Innovana Thinklabs LtdINNOVANA | 38.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 8.7/35 Revenue 26% · PAT -39% · OPM change -32.5 pp 95% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 17.6% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y -40.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.7 + 11.3 + 9 + 9.7 = 38.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 49Kellton Tech Solutions LtdKELLTONTEC | 36.2/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | BASING | 10.0/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 9.6% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE 15% · OPM 11% 95% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -19.4% · 1Y -45.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 9.7 + 11.9 + 4.6 = 36.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 50Aurionpro Solutions LtdAURIONPRO | 36.1/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT 5.1% · OPM change -3 pp 100% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 16.3% · OPM 17% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 18× · PEG 1.39 65% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -30.2% · RS bench -25.6% · 1Y -47.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 10.7 + 10 + 2.5 = 36.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 51Allied Digital Services LtdADSL | 35.5/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | BASING | 14.2/35 Revenue 19.1% · PAT 5.6% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 7.4% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 14.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -29.8% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y -39.4%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 6.5 + 10.7 + 4.1 = 35.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 52Mindteck (India) LtdMINDTECK | 32.3/100Adverse evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.9/35 Revenue -1.8% · PAT 0.3% · OPM change -1.7 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 7.8% 95% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 15.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 2.2/20 RS sector -27.9% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y -24.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.9 + 10.4 + 11.8 + 2.2 = 32.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 53Moschip Technologies LtdMOSCHIP | 31.1/100Adverse evidence87% evidence | TURNING | 7.7/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT -33.6% · OPM change -3.9 pp 100% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 11% · OPM 8.2% 100% evidence | 3.7/20 P/E 129× · PEG 5.04 65% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 1.9% · RS bench 0.9% · 1Y -15.1%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.7 + 7 + 3.7 + 12.7 = 31.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 54Orient Technologies LtdORIENTTECH | 30.7/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | BASING | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.5 pp 19% evidence | 2.4/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 6.7% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 45.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -21.8% · RS bench -16.7% · 1Y -9.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 2.4 + 9 + 4.2 = 30.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 55Quick Heal Technologies LtdQUICKHEAL | 20.4/100Adverse evidence69% evidence | BASING | 6.2/35 Revenue -6.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -22.1 pp 71% evidence | 1.8/25 ROCE -6% · OPM -39% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.4/20 RS sector -32.9% · RS bench -29.1% · 1Y -50.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.2 + 1.8 + 10 + 2.4 = 20.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 56Covance Softsol Ltd544361 | 66.8/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | 25.8/35 Revenue 43.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 19.7 pp 62% evidence | 17.8/25 ROCE 31.4% · OPM 23.1% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 48.4% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 25.8 + 17.8 + 11.1 + 12.1 = 66.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 57Exato Technologies Ltd544626 | 57.8/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | TURNING | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.4 pp 45% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 26.8% · OPM 18% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 40× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 17.5 + 9.3 + 10 = 57.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 58Unified Data- Tech Solutions LtdUNIFIED | 56.1/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence | 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1 pp 26% evidence | 18.8/25 ROCE 45.2% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 18.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y 15.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 18.8 + 10.2 + 10.2 = 56.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 59Kody Technolab LtdKODYTECH | 54.2/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5 pp 19% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 16.8% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 125× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 10.3% · RS bench 61.9% · 1Y 107.4%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 14.4 + 8.7 + 15.9 = 54.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 60Metalic Technoforge LtdMETA | 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional27% evidence | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 13% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 36.1% · OPM 8% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 25.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -12.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 17.1 + 9.7 + 10 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 61Veefin Solutions LtdVEEFIN | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp 19% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 9.8% · OPM 19.7% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 27.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -24.9% · 1Y -40%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 10.6 + 12.2 + 6.8 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 62Trident Techlabs LtdTECHLABS | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence | 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 15% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 26.7% · OPM 27% 71% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 14.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -50.2% · RS bench -56.5% · 1Y -72.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 16 + 16.2 + 10.5 + 3.1 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 63ERP Soft Systems Ltd530909 | 44.2/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | 19.8/35 Revenue 19.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.1 pp 53% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 1.7% 57% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 74.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector — · RS bench -47.6% · 1Y -59.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-29 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 8 + 8.8 + 7.6 = 44.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 64IDream Film Infrastructure Company Ltd504375 | 38.2/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | TURNING | 12.8/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -9.2% · OPM -25.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 78% · 1Y —8 of 8 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 3.1 + 10 + 12.3 = 38.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is R Systems International Ltd's share price today?
R Systems International Ltd trades at ₹240, −46.5% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,848 Cr. The stock sits at 10% of its 52-week range of ₹220–₹428, −17.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 42 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were R Systems International Ltd's latest quarterly results?
R Systems International Ltd reported revenue of ₹602 Cr and net profit of ₹56.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 30.3% and profit fell 26.3% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹4.69. The operating margin was 18.0%, 3.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's revenue?
R Systems International Ltd reported revenue of ₹602 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +30.3% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,958 Cr (+12.4%). Over the last 9 years revenue compounded at 14.3% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's profit?
R Systems International Ltd earned ₹56.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −26.3% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹186 Cr. The operating margin ran 18.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's market cap?
R Systems International Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,848 Cr at a share price of ₹240. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's P/E ratio?
R Systems International Ltd trades at a P/E of 13.5×, at the 20th percentile of its own 11-year range, against a long-run median of 19.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does R Systems International Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — R Systems International Ltd's dividend payout was 38% of profit in FY25, and it recorded a payout in 8 of its last 12 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, R Systems International Ltd looks cheap: its P/E of 13.5× has been cheaper only 20% of the time in 11 years (long-run median 19.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd growing?
Yes — R Systems International Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +30.3% year on year, profit −26.3%, and the margin +3.0 pp at 18.0%. The 9-year compound rates are 14.3% (revenue) and 14.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 11 September 2026.
How is R Systems International Ltd performing?
R Systems International Ltd is in a downtrend, 42 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 30.3% and profit fell 26.3% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 57 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is R Systems International Ltd in?
Topping out — profit and EPS growth have decelerated hard (profit growth +42.0% at its peak → −1.0% latest) while ROCE still reads 24.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +24.2% latest, profit growth −1.0% latest, eps growth −0.4% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 42 of stage 4), trading −17.9% versus its 200-day average and at 10% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view R Systems International Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (57 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-09-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +283% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will R Systems International Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for R Systems International Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹240, the price is in a downtrend 42 weeks in. Its P/E of 13.5× sits at the 20th percentile of its own 11-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns R Systems International Ltd?
Promoters hold 51.9% of R Systems International Ltd, foreign institutions 3.8%, domestic institutions 6.5% and the public 37.8% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions added 4.8 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does R Systems International Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — R Systems International Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.52, and operating profit covers the interest bill 22×. FY25 borrowings were ₹410 Cr against equity of ₹792 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's capex?
R Systems International Ltd spent ₹1,151 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was ₹616 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is R Systems International Ltd's cash flow?
R Systems International Ltd generated ₹220 Cr of operating cash flow in FY25 and ₹−396 Cr of free cash flow after ₹616 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹186 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 146% of R Systems International Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 118% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY25, operating cash was ₹220 Cr against reported profit of ₹186 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is R Systems International Ltd in its business cycle?
R Systems International Ltd's FY25 operating margin was 16.0%, against a 12-year band of 6.0%–16.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 18.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does R Systems International Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, R Systems International Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 5.2% a year. Profit itself has compounded 14.7% a year over the past 9 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the R Systems International Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +41.8% against a −46.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is R Systems International Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: R Systems International Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +41.8% in a year against a −46.5% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!