Hypersoft Technologies Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd trades at ₹87.6, in a confirmed uptrend and 78 weeks into that stage. That is +42.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 92% of a 52-week range of ₹18 to ₹94. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 78 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹87.6 it trades +42.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 92% of its 52-week range (₹18–₹94).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +669% while the NIFTY 500 moved +260% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 1 straight week — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd trades at 248.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 16.6×, measured across 10.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 248.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 16.6× measured over 10.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +76.3%/yr price move, ~+39.2%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+37.1 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +22.6%/yr price move, ~+20.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+2.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 8 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Hypersoft Technologies Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for IT - Software.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd reported ₹1.5 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +1,150.0% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 13.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹8.1 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹30.0 Cr.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹8.1 Cr (+869.9% on the year), capping 10 years at 13.6% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹1.5 Cr, +1,150.0% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4,044.1% growth against the decade's 13.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +6,413.0% over the last 4 quarters against +493.7%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd's operating margin is 17.3% in the Dec 25 quarter, +700.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.9% to 12.8%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 17.3%, +700.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −40.9%–12.8%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +700.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +701.3 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd earned ₹0.2 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹0.2 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −4.1%. That is 12.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.8 Cr. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was ₹0.2 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹0.2 Cr (null), and the 10-year compound rate is −4.1%.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 196% of Hypersoft Technologies Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was ₹0.3 Cr of operating cash against ₹0.2 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹0.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹0.3 Cr against reported profit of ₹0.2 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹0.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 196% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 196%: the cash cycle stretched 72 days between FY20 and FY25 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 82 days in FY25, up from 9 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹8.1 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr, so roughly ₹2.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY25: debtors at 82 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 82 days, looser than FY20's 9.

In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹8.1 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr — so the 82-day loop keeps roughly ₹2.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−2.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd earns a ROCE of 21% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −9% in FY24. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 2.6% net margin on 2.59× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 21%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −9% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 2.6% net margin × 2.59× asset turns × 1.29× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.7% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd carries ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹2.4 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Operating profit covers the interest bill 43×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.1 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY25: borrowings of ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹2.4 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Operating profit covers the interest bill 43×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.1 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹−2.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters added 24.4 points of Hypersoft Technologies Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 59.2% of the company. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +24.4 points over 8 quarters to 59.2%.

Why the register moved: promoters drove it (+24.4 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Hypersoft Technologies Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions