TCC Concept Ltd
TCCTCC Concept Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +12.3% in a year against a −44.5% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +12.3% against a −44.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (32 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 1st percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +44.4% year on year, and 113% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
TCC Concept Ltd trades at ₹291, in a downtrend and 32 weeks into that stage. That is −27.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 5% of a 52-week range of ₹271 to ₹646. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (19 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 32 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹291 it trades −27.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 5% of its 52-week range (₹271–₹646).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.1 years the stock moved +1,693% while the NIFTY 500 moved +44% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (19 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-30) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
TCC Concept Ltd trades at 20.9× P/E, about the cheapest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 38.3×, measured across 2.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 20.9× is about the cheapest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 38.3× measured over 2.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +12.3% against a −44.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
TCC Concept Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — revenue growth is rising at +206.5% while profit growth is decelerating from its peak at +51.1% — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 8 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +115.7% | +463.6% | — | +43.0% |
| Profit | +54.8% | +302.1% | — | — |
| EPS | +12.3% | — | — | — |
| Share price | −44.5% | +126.2% | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
47.3/100 — rank 15 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 81% evidence confidence
TCC Concept Ltd scores 47.3 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 15. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.3 + 11.4 + 14.1 + 4.5 = 47.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
TCC Concept Ltd reported ₹128 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +481.8% year on year. That is the 6th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 43.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹179 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹285 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹179 Cr (+115.7% on the year), capping 10 years at 43.0% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹128 Cr, +481.8% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +203.1% growth against the decade's 43.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +206.5% over the last 4 quarters against +86.4%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +51.1% vs +71.9%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
TCC Concept Ltd's operating margin is 36.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, −45.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −4.0% to 88.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 36.0%, −45.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −4.0%–88.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −45.0 pp year on year while gross margin went −14.8 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
TCC Concept Ltd earned ₹13.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +44.4% year on year. It is the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹65.0 Cr. That is 10.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹9.0 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹13.0 Cr, +44.4% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹65.0 Cr (+54.8%).
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +481.8% and the margin −45.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +44.5% vs revenue +203.1%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 113% of TCC Concept Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹113 Cr of operating cash against ₹65.0 Cr of profit. After ₹1,229 Cr of capital spending, ₹−1,116 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹113 Cr against reported profit of ₹65.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−1,116 Cr after ₹1,229 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 113% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 113%: the cash cycle stretched 78 days between FY19 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 28.4× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
TCC Concept Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 118 days in FY26, up from 40 days in FY19. Capital spending ran ₹1,844 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹179 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.5 Cr, so roughly ₹58.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 118 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 118 days, looser than FY19's 40.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹179 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.5 Cr — so the 118-day loop keeps roughly ₹58.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,844 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹65.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹74.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
TCC Concept Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −6% in FY15. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −8.2 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 36.3% net margin on 0.08× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 6%, recovered from a FY15 trough of −6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 36.3% net margin × 0.08× asset turns × 1.28× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.7% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 3.8% − 12.0% = a −8.2 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
TCC Concept Ltd carries total debt of ₹291 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,645 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.18 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.00 in FY23 to 0.18 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹291 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,645 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.18. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.00 (FY23) to 0.18 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 13.8 points of TCC Concept Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 45.7% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +2.5 points over the same window, to 2.6%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −13.8 points over 8 quarters to 45.7%; Foreign institutions: +2.5 points over 8 quarters to 2.6%; Domestic institutions: −1.3 points over 8 quarters to 2.3%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−13.8 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+2.5 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
TCC Concept Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1IIRM Holdings India Ltd526530 | 66.2/100Favorable setup71% evidence | LEADER | 17.7/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 8.4 pp 83% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.8% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 49.6% · RS bench 53.5% · 1Y 67.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 19.1 + 9.7 + 19.7 = 66.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Sagility LtdSAGILITY | 66.1/100Favorable setup87% evidence | TURNING | 24.4/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 1.05 65% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 7.2% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -1.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 15.5 + 14.2 + 12 = 66.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY | 65.2/100Favorable setup75% evidence | TURNING | 24.8/35 Revenue 35.2% · PAT 87% · OPM change 4.3 pp 59% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 8% 95% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 28.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.6/20 RS sector 16.1% · RS bench 19.4% · 1Y 16.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.8 + 12.3 + 10.5 + 17.6 = 65.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Exhicon Events Media Solutions Ltd543895 | 64.4/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 2.2% · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y -7.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 20.1 + 13.6 + 11.4 = 64.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.8/35 Revenue 42.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 65% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 534× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 3.3% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 17.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 14.2 + 8.6 + 14.2 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence | LEADER | 16.8/35 Revenue 20.4% · PAT 4.9% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 24.8% · RS bench 28.1% · 1Y 16%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 16 + 8.1 + 18.4 = 59.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 28.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Global Education LtdGLOBAL | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.6/35 Revenue 29.9% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change 7.5 pp 83% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 47% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 20× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 56.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 19.4 + 10.8 + 12.5 = 59.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Take Solutions LtdTAKE | 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | 25.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 57% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 3222× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 68% · RS bench 71.4% · 1Y 305.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 25.1 + 8.3 + 8.5 + 17 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY | 58.5/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 22.5/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 21.1% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 22% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector — · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 16.9 + 10.4 + 8.7 = 58.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD | 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.1/35 Revenue -0.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 10.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y -1.9%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 15.3 + 11.5 + 6.7 = 57.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.2% and the one-year return is -1.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 11Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK | 56.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 21.4/35 Revenue 25.6% · PAT 76.7% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 74% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 104× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 22% · 1Y 13%5 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.4 + 9.1 + 12.1 = 56 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN | 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 123× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y 94.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 11.7 + 9 + 13.9 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.7/35 Revenue 24.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -4.1% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 66× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -8.6% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y -1.1%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 9.5 + 9.3 + 7.2 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 17.6/35 Revenue 8.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -3% · 1Y -19.9%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 14.9 + 8.1 + 7.7 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15TCC Concept Ltdthis pageTCC | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -35% · 1Y -44.2%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.4 + 14.1 + 4.5 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16GKW LtdGKWLIMITED | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT 87.5% · OPM change 2160.4 pp 83% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM — 80% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -8.8%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.7 + 10 + 9.3 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER | 43.4/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 62% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 6.1% · OPM 34.5% 95% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 59.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -20.5% · 1Y -0.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 11.2 + 9.6 + 1.4 = 43.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT | 41.5/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change -1015.9 pp 83% evidence | 5.9/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM -932.6% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector 6.3% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 23.1%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 5.9 + 10 + 11 = 41.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON | 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.7/35 Revenue 30.8% · PAT -52.5% · OPM change -2377.7 pp 48% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 39.2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 168.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -41.3% · RS bench -74.1% · 1Y -68.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 16.8 + 8.7 + 3.2 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL | 41.2/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 5% · OPM change 3 pp 65% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM -15% 100% evidence | 5.1/20 P/E 13.6× · PEG 2.98 100% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y -30.4%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.6 + 5.1 + 5.4 = 41.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT | 40.8/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.1/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 23.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 9.4 + 10.3 + 10 = 40.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.2/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT -66.4% · OPM change -5 pp 83% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench -11.6% · 1Y -28.9%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.2 + 9.6 + 12.5 + 5.3 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL | 33.7/100Adverse evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -284.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -349.6% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 66.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -19.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 4.7 + 9.2 + 4.2 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Unitech LtdUNITECH | 32.0/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.8/35 Revenue 59% · PAT 5% · OPM change -584 pp 62% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 184% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -24.8% · 1Y -42.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 6.1 + 10 + 3.1 = 32 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Stanley Lifestyles LtdSTANLEY | 31.5/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | TURNING | 8.4/35 Revenue -1.6% · PAT -55.5% · OPM change -5.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 14.9% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 62.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -43.7% · RS bench -23.7% · 1Y -53.6%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.4 + 10.3 + 9.5 + 3.3 = 31.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA | 29.3/100Adverse evidence62% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.8/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change 19 pp 65% evidence | 1.6/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -6% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -32.1% · RS bench -23% · 1Y -45%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.8 + 1.6 + 10 + 3.9 = 29.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Embassy Developments LtdEMBDL | 26.2/100Adverse evidence68% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 4.3/35 Revenue -20.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -76.9 pp 83% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -76% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y -45.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.3 + 3.6 + 10 + 8.3 = 26.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Central Mine Planning & Design Institute LtdCMPDI | 62.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | TURNING | 22.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 32% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 26.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 19.8 + 10.1 + 10 = 62.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29FlySBS Aviation LtdFLYSBS | 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | TURNING | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -8 pp 26% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 32.5% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 4.4%3 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 18.9 + 11.4 + 9 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 | 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 33.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector — · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 15 + 9.8 + 11.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 31Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL | 51.9/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | TURNING | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.6 pp 19% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 144× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -16.1% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y -8.1%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.7 + 8.9 + 8.9 = 51.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 32Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 9 + 10 + 12.3 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 33Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE | 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.9/35 Revenue 36.9% · PAT 23.6% · OPM change 5 pp 62% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 62% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -20.2%2 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 9.6 + 10 + 8.8 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.4/35 Revenue 76.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 62% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 75.5% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 9.6%4 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 8.9 + 10 + 11.4 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 35Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS | 44.6/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 14.1/35 Revenue -20% · PAT 69.8% · OPM change -8 pp 40% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 8% 71% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 8.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 5.7 + 10 + 14.8 = 44.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 | 42.6/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | TURNING | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT -80% · OPM change — 50% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 6.3 + 10 + 10 = 42.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is TCC Concept Ltd's share price today?
TCC Concept Ltd trades at ₹291, −44.5% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹1,377 Cr. The stock sits at 5% of its 52-week range of ₹271–₹646, −27.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 32 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were TCC Concept Ltd's latest quarterly results?
TCC Concept Ltd reported revenue of ₹128 Cr and net profit of ₹13.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 481.8% and profit rose 44.4% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.58. The operating margin was 36.0%, 45.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's revenue?
TCC Concept Ltd reported revenue of ₹128 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +481.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹179 Cr (+115.7%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 43.0% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's profit?
TCC Concept Ltd earned ₹13.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +44.4% year on year — the 6th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹65.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 36.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's market cap?
TCC Concept Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹1,377 Cr at a share price of ₹291. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's P/E ratio?
TCC Concept Ltd trades at a P/E of 20.9×, at the 1st percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 38.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does TCC Concept Ltd pay a dividend?
No — TCC Concept Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 10 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, TCC Concept Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 20.9× has been cheaper only 1% of the time in 2 years (long-run median 38.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd growing?
Yes — TCC Concept Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +481.8% year on year, profit +44.4%, and the margin −45.0 pp at 36.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is TCC Concept Ltd performing?
TCC Concept Ltd is in a downtrend, 32 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 481.8% and profit rose 44.4% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 19 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is TCC Concept Ltd in?
Mixed — revenue growth is rising at +206.5% while profit growth is decelerating from its peak at +51.1% — the curves disagree, so the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +206.5% latest, profit growth +51.1% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 32 of stage 4), trading −27.0% versus its 200-day average and at 5% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view TCC Concept Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (19 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-30), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 3.1 years the stock moved +1,693% against the NIFTY 500's +44% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will TCC Concept Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for TCC Concept Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹291, the price is in a downtrend 32 weeks in. Its P/E of 20.9× sits at the 1st percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns TCC Concept Ltd?
Promoters hold 45.7% of TCC Concept Ltd, foreign institutions 2.6%, domestic institutions 2.3% and the public 49.4% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 13.8 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does TCC Concept Ltd have too much debt?
No — TCC Concept Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.18, and operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. FY26 borrowings were ₹291 Cr against equity of ₹1,643 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's capex?
TCC Concept Ltd spent ₹1,844 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹1,229 Cr, with ₹74.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is TCC Concept Ltd's cash flow?
TCC Concept Ltd generated ₹113 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−1,116 Cr of free cash flow after ₹1,229 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹65.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 113% of TCC Concept Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹113 Cr against reported profit of ₹65.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is TCC Concept Ltd in its business cycle?
TCC Concept Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 54.0%, against a 11-year band of −4.0%–88.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 36.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the TCC Concept Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +12.3% against a −44.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is TCC Concept Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: TCC Concept Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +12.3% in a year against a −44.5% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.