TCC Concept share price today

TCC Concept Ltd's share price was ₹40.58 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 45 weeks. That is 37.3% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹38 and ₹113, and at that close it sat 4% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today TCC Concept Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 33 weeks running.

Over the last 3.4 years the share price moved +1,152% while the NIFTY 500 moved +35%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 30 April 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: operating margin down 45 points on a year earlier, number of shareholders up 165% in a year and revenue up on a year earlier for 6 quarters in a row.

1. Operating margin down 45 points on a year earlier

   36% in the June 2026 quarter, from 81%.

2. Number of shareholders up 165% in a year

   9,702 shareholders in the September 2026 quarter, against 3,661 a year earlier.

3. Revenue up on a year earlier for 6 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹128 crore, +481.8% on a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), TCC Concept reported revenue of ₹128 crore, up 481.8% from ₹22.0 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹13.0 crore, up 44.4% from ₹9.00 crore.

TCC Concept results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

TCC Concept closed at ₹40.58 on 4 November 2026, down 64.1% from ₹113.11 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 92.6% over three years. Its highest weekly close since June 2023 was ₹145.90 on 2 August 2024.

TCC Concept share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices, adjusted for splits and bonuses so every price is on today’s share count. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

181 weekly closes from 21 June 2023 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: TCC Concept closed at ₹40.58, up 0.6% on the week and down 14.7% on the month. 4 Sep 2026: Share split: face value cut from ₹10 to ₹2 a share (ex-date).

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 481.8% and profit up 44.4% on a year earlier.

TCC Concept has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (21 June 2023), the start of the period we checked.

No. TCC Concept Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 10 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

TCC Concept is on 2 of our India lists: Undervalued stocks and Penny stocks.

TCC Concept Ltd earned ₹13.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +44.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹65.0 Cr. That is 10.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹9.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹65.0 Cr (+54.8% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +481.8% on a year earlier and the margin moved −45.0 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +44.5% and revenue +203.1%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

TCC Concept Ltd reported ₹128 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +481.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 10 years it has grown 43.0% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹179 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹285 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹179 Cr, +115.7% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +203.1% on average, against 43.0% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +206.5%, against +86.4% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +51.1%, against +71.9% a year (rolling over).

TCC Concept Ltd's operating margin was 36.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 45.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 years it has been between −4.0% and 88.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −45.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −14.8 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 113% of TCC Concept Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹113 Cr of operating cash against ₹65.0 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹1,230 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹1,117 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 113% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 78 days longer between FY19 and FY26, so more of each rupee of profit waits in the business before it arrives.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 28.4× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

TCC Concept Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 118 days in FY26, up from 40 days in FY19. It spent ₹1,845 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹179 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹0.5 Cr, so roughly ₹58.0 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

Spending on assets: ₹1,845 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹65.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹95.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

TCC Concept Ltd's P/E is 14.7×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 60.9×, over 3.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Jun 2026 add up to ₹2.93.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +15.7% while the price moved −64.1%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +24.4% a year; about +184.4% a year came from earnings growth and about −160.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

TCC Concept Ltd's business is giving mixed signals. Revenue growth is rising at +206.5% while profit growth is slowing from its peak at +51.1%, so the lines disagree and each one tells part of the story. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

TCC Concept Ltd earned a ROCE of 6% in FY26. That is up from a low of −6% in FY15. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 9.0 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

It comes from a 36.3% net margin and 0.08× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 36.3% net margin × 0.08× asset turnover × 1.28× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 3.7% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 3.0% − 12.0% = −9.0 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

TCC Concept Ltd has total debt of ₹291 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,645 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.18× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.00 in FY23 to 0.18 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Promoters cut their stake in TCC Concept Ltd by 15.2 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 45.7% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +2.4 points over the same period, to 3.2%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −15.2 points over 8 quarters, to 45.7%; Domestic institutions: +2.4 points over 8 quarters, to 3.2%; Foreign institutions: +0.6 points over 8 quarters, to 2.1%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (−15.2 points), with the other side taken by domestic institutions (+2.4 points). They reduced their stake.

For TCC Concept Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

48.0 out of 100, rank 17 of 42 in Miscellaneous, with 71% of the evidence available.

TCC Concept Ltd scores 48.0 out of 100 against the 42 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 17. The valuation scores well, but earnings are not improving yet, so the business does not back up the low multiple so far.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 15.7 + 10.2 + 14.5 + 7.6 = 48. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

TCC Concept ranks 17 of 42 Miscellaneous companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 48.0 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Miscellaneous, all 42 compared on one page.

TCC Concept is the 20th largest of 42 Miscellaneous companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Aeroflex Enterprises, Jindal Photo and Unitech. Just below it: GKW, Gulshan Polyols and Shree Vasu Logistics.

Miscellaneous companies close in size

17. Aeroflex Enterprises Ltd ₹1,410 crore
18. Jindal Photo Ltd ₹1,167 crore
19. Unitech Ltd ₹1,028 crore
20. TCC Concept Ltd ₹961 crore
21. GKW Ltd ₹950 crore
22. Gulshan Polyols Ltd ₹887 crore
23. Shree Vasu Logistics Ltd ₹850 crore

All 42 Miscellaneous companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1618. B-Right RealEstate Ltd ₹964 crore · Construction - Factories/Offices/Commercial
1619. Hariom Pipe Industries Ltd ₹964 crore · Steel - Tubes/Pipes
1620. TCC Concept Ltd ₹961 crore
1621. Western Carriers (India) Ltd ₹960 crore · Logistics
1622. Premier Polyfilm Ltd ₹953 crore · Plastics - Sheets/Films

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.