Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-14
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-14

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd

CMPDI
Miscellaneous

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows.

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (18 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 100th percentile of its own 0-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +52.6% year on year, and 92% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.

Price
₹237
P/E
25.9×
100th pctile
of its own 0-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹481 Cr
+17.6% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹116 Cr
+52.6% YoY
Operating margin
30.0%
+8.0 pp YoY
ROCE
38%
FY26
ROIC
68.8%
vs WACC 12.0% → +56.8 pp
Cash conversion
92%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹237, in a confirmed uptrend and 18 weeks into that stage. That is +16.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 58% of a 52-week range of ₹181 to ₹278. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 18 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹237 it trades +16.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 58% of its 52-week range (₹181–₹278).

Aug 26: ₹237 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+16.7% versus the 200-day line, week 18 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S2₹287₹252₹216₹181₹145₹237₹203Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26
S4S2₹287₹252₹216₹181₹145₹237₹203Apr 26Jun 26Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2026 Each cell is one week from 2026 to now (23 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Apr 26Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved +31% while the NIFTY 500 moved +3% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at 25.9× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 0.1×, measured across 0.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 25.9× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 0.1× measured over 0.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 25.9× vs a 0.1× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 0.2-year window. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
about the priciest it has ever traded
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
1.3×₹2,7370.9×₹2,0530.6×₹1,3690.3×₹6840.0×₹0.0×0.10×₹2,535May 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26Jul 26
1.3×₹2,7370.9×₹2,0530.6×₹1,3690.3×₹6840.0×₹0.0×0.10×₹2,535May 26Jun 26Jul 26
P/E
25.9×
100th percentile of 0y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +10.2% in FY26, profit −8.1% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
29%83%16%34%3.1%−15%−9.7%−64%−22%−113%%%10.2%−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
29%83%16%34%3.1%−15%−9.7%−64%−22%−113%%%10.2%−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfit
18%59%16%35%15%10%13%−14%11%−39%%%17.6%52.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
18%59%16%35%15%10%13%−14%11%−39%%%17.6%52.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
54%48%43%37%31%%38%FY23FY24FY26
54%48%43%37%31%%38%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Steady high
latest 38.0% · span 33.0%–52.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+10.2%+18.7%+9.2%
Profit−8.1%+27.3%+14.1%
EPS−99.8%−83.9%−67.1%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+17.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+52.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
9.2%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

62.4/100 — rank 29 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 38% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd scores 62.4 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 29. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.1 + 20.1 + 10.2 + 10 = 62.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported ₹481 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 9.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,317 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,246 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2% on the year), capping 5 years at 9.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹481 Cr, +17.6% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
9.2% a year over 5 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.5k29%1.9k16%1.3k3.1%626−9.7%0−22%₹ Cr%₹2,31710.2%FY21FY23FY26
2.5k29%1.9k16%1.3k3.1%626−9.7%0−22%₹ Cr%₹2,31710.2%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹481 Cr (+17.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
89318%67016%44715%22313%011%₹ Cr%₹48117.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
89318%67016%44715%22313%011%₹ Cr%₹48117.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +14.7% growth against the decade's 9.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's operating margin is 30.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +8.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved −15.0 percentage points. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0% to 42.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 30.0%, +8.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0%–42.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −14.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.2 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 34.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 6-year window.
within a 28.0–42.0% band over 6 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
43%16%39%9.8%35%4.0%31%−1.8%27%−7.6%%%34%−6%FY21FY23FY26
43%16%39%9.8%35%4.0%31%−1.8%27%−7.6%%%34%−6%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: 30.0% operating margin (+8.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
47%9.9%40%3.0%34%−4.0%27%−11%20%−18%%%30%8%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
47%9.9%40%3.0%34%−4.0%27%−11%20%−18%%%30%8%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The 5-year compound rate is 14.1%. That is 24.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹277 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹116 Cr, +52.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹613 Cr (−8.1%), and the 5-year compound rate is 14.1%.

FY26 profit ₹613 Cr (−8.1% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
14.1% a year over 5 years
Net profitYoY growth
72076%54053%36029%1805.9%0−17%₹ Cr%₹613−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
72076%54053%36029%1805.9%0−17%₹ Cr%₹613−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹116 Cr (+52.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
29959%22435%15010%75−14%0−39%₹ Cr%₹11652.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
29959%22435%15010%75−14%0−39%₹ Cr%₹11652.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹716 Cr of operating cash against ₹613 Cr of profit. After ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹651 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹651 Cr after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 92% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹716 Cr vs profit ₹613 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 6-year window, annual resolution.
92% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
7735803871930₹ Cr₹716₹613₹651FY21FY23FY26
7735803871930₹ Cr₹716₹613₹651FY21FY23FY26
FY26: CFO = 117% of profit (three-year rate 92%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
143%111%80%49%17%%117%FY21FY23FY26
143%111%80%49%17%%117%FY21FY23FY26

Why conversion sits at 92%: the cash cycle tightened 50 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 169 days in FY26, down from 219 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr, so roughly ₹1,073 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 169 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 169 days, tighter than FY21's 219.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr — so the 169-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,073 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 169-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 6-year window.
−50 days vs FY21
Cash cycleDebtor days
253229205181157days169d169dFY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
253229205181157days169d169dFY21FY23FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹126 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹100 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹42.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹65.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹42.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
705335180₹ Cr₹65₹42FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
705335180₹ Cr₹65₹42FY22FY24FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earns a ROCE of 38% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 33% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +56.8 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 26.5% net margin on 0.71× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 38%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 33% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 26.5% net margin × 0.71× asset turns × 1.43× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 26.9% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 68.8% − 12.0% = a +56.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.

FY26: ROCE 38% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's 33%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
55%44%32%20%8.8%%38%42.3%FY22FY24FY26
55%44%32%20%8.8%%38%42.3%FY22FY24FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 26.7% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 3 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
28%24%19%15%11%%26.7%19.7%Q4 FY25Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
28%24%19%15%11%%26.7%19.7%Q4 FY25Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd carries ₹1.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹2,283 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹126 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

FY26: borrowings ₹1.0 Cr at 0.00× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 6-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
debt is falling while the business grows
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
2.21.2×1.60.6×1.10.0×0.5−0.6×0.0−1.2×₹ Cr×₹10.00×FY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
2.21.2×1.60.6×1.10.0×0.5−0.6×0.0−1.2×₹ Cr×₹10.00×FY21FY23FY26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — .

A quiet register: no holder moved a full point in two years Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 2 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
92%67%43%18%−6.3%%85%0.5%7.8%6.6%Mar 26Jun 26
92%67%43%18%−6.3%%85%0.5%7.8%6.6%Mar 26Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Miscellaneous
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY 75.2/100Favorable setup87% evidence ASLEEP 27.5/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence 19.1/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 13.7/20 P/E 8× · PEG — 50% evidence 14.9/20 RS sector 14.1% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 8.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.5 + 19.1 + 13.7 + 14.9 = 75.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Sagility LtdSAGILITY 66.3/100Favorable setup87% evidence BASING 24.7/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG 1.02 65% evidence 11.8/20 RS sector 7.1% · RS bench -7.7% · 1Y -6.4%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.7 + 15.8 + 14 + 11.8 = 66.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Exhicon Events Media Solutions LtdEXHICON 65.1/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence 19.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence 20.1/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 19.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 15.8% · RS bench 13.7% · 1Y -3.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 20.1 + 10.4 + 15.6 = 65.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER 62.9/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence LEADER 19.7/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence 14.7/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 50% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 37% · RS bench 34.8% · 1Y 32.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.7 + 14.7 + 8.9 + 19.6 = 62.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5IIRM Holdings India LtdIIRM 60.1/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence 17.6/35 Revenue 16.2% · PAT 21.6% · OPM change 1.1 pp 95% evidence 19.0/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.6% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 36× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 6.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-03-08 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 19 + 9.8 + 13.7 = 60.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Take Solutions LtdTAKE 58.7/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence 24.7/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 57% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM — 80% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 3222× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 69.7% · RS bench 71.4% · 1Y 384%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.7 + 8.5 + 8.5 + 17 = 58.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Global Education LtdGLOBAL 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence ASLEEP 14.2/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 3.3% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence 19.8/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 41% 95% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 17.3% · RS bench 16% · 1Y 63%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.2 + 19.8 + 10.3 + 13.9 = 58.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT 56.8/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence FADING 22.7/35 Revenue 38.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 191× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.1/20 RS sector 3.1% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 14.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.7 + 11.3 + 8.7 + 14.1 = 56.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence FADING 22.3/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change 2.6 pp 95% evidence 15.3/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 10.4% 95% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench -16.7% · 1Y —4 of 5 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 15.3 + 10.5 + 8.3 = 56.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.9/35 Revenue 25.9% · PAT 40.9% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 77% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 110× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench 12% · 1Y 9%7 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 13.2 + 9.2 + 11.8 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN 54.5/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence FADING 22.2/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -13.2 pp 95% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 61.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.6/20 RS sector 1% · RS bench -0.3% · 1Y 24.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 9.1 + 9.6 + 13.6 = 54.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence 11.6/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 9% 95% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 124× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector 16.2% · RS bench 15% · 1Y 76.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 11.6 + 8.8 + 14.5 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN 50.5/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence FADING 20.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 95% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 80% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 102× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 14.1%2 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 11.4 = 50.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence TURNING 18.9/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 16.3× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 1% · 1Y -12.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 13.6 + 9.1 + 8.7 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 19.6/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT -40.4% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 15% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.7/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -20% · 1Y -6.5%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 12.7 + 10.8 + 6.7 = 49.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16TCC Concept LtdTCC 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 16.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence 14.3/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -40.7% · 1Y -48.8%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 11.8 + 14.3 + 4.5 = 47.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 20.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 15 pp 95% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM 98% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.3/20 RS sector -14.4% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y 26.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.4 + 10.1 + 10 + 6.3 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON 45.9/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence ASLEEP 18.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2358 pp 71% evidence 18.8/25 ROCE 131% · OPM 58% 95% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 819× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.0/20 RS sector -75.9% · RS bench -76% · 1Y -80.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 18.8 + 8.6 + 0 = 45.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence ASLEEP 24.2/35 Revenue 23.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 95% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -14% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 65.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -13.4% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y -17.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 5 + 9.4 + 4.4 = 43 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.4% and the one-year return is -17.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
20TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT 40.1/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence TURNING 10.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —6 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 10.7 + 9.3 + 10.1 + 10 = 40.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21GKW LtdGKWLIMITED 39.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 10.9/35 Revenue -13.5% · PAT 0% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence 9.2/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 84% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -1% · RS bench -6.6% · 1Y -2.4%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.9 + 9.2 + 10 + 9 = 39.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Unitech LtdUNITECH 36.6/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue 45.3% · PAT -10% · OPM change 15 pp 71% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 6% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -28.6% · RS bench -29.3% · 1Y -42.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 3.5 + 10 + 5.1 = 36.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL 36.1/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 11.3/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -21.7% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 40% 100% evidence 5.0/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG 3.12 100% evidence 5.4/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -18.3% · 1Y -27.6%3 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.3 + 14.4 + 5 + 5.4 = 36.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP 35.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 9.7/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence 8.6/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 18% 95% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 10.5× · PEG — 50% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y -26.9%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.7 + 8.6 + 12.3 + 5.3 = 35.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER 34.7/100Adverse evidence80% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue -9.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.2 pp 95% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -35.6% 95% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.8/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -20% · 1Y -3.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 6.4 + 9.5 + 1.8 = 34.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26Stanley Lifestyles LtdSTANLEY 29.9/100Adverse evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 6.6/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.4 pp 95% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 17.3% 95% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 113× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -43.7% · RS bench -32% · 1Y -56.2%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 6.6 + 10.8 + 9.1 + 3.4 = 29.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Embassy Developments LtdEMBDL 28.4/100Adverse evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 5.9/35 Revenue -46.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -58.4 pp 71% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -60% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.1/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -35.7%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 5.9 + 3.4 + 10 + 9.1 = 28.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA 17.6/100Adverse evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 2.7/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -23.9 pp 100% evidence 1.0/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM 2.1% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -32.1% · RS bench -25.1% · 1Y -41.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 2.7 + 1 + 10 + 3.9 = 17.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltdthis pageCMPDI 62.4/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence ASLEEP 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 32% evidence 20.1/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 95% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 25.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 5 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 20.1 + 10.2 + 10 = 62.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30FlySBS Aviation LtdFLYSBS 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence TURNING 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -8 pp 26% evidence 19.4/25 ROCE 32.5% · OPM 21% 95% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench -12.2% · 1Y -1.6%3 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 19.4 + 11.2 + 8.8 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
31Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 53.5/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence TURNING 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 26% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 34× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y —2 of 2 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 14.8 + 9.9 + 11.5 = 53.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
32Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL 52.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 26% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 25.8% 95% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 121× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench 9.8% · 1Y -4.4%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 15.8 + 8.9 + 9 = 52 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
33Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 49.9/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.1 + 10 + 12.4 = 49.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
34Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence TURNING 18.9/35 Revenue 38.9% · PAT 30.4% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 61% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench -6.3% · 1Y -16.7%2 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.3 + 10 + 9.1 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
35Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 46.6/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 15.8% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 60.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —6 of 6 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 6.7 + 9.7 + 10 = 46.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
36Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS 45.0/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence 14.1/35 Revenue -20% · PAT 69.8% · OPM change -8 pp 40% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 8% 71% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 14.8/20 RS sector 8.8% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 9.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.1 + 6.1 + 10 + 14.8 = 45 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price today?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹237. The company is valued at ₹16,940 Cr. The stock sits at 58% of its 52-week range of ₹181–₹278, +16.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 18 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.

What were Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr and net profit of ₹116 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.63. The operating margin was 30.0%, 8.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's revenue?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 9.2% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The operating margin ran 30.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market cap?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹16,940 Cr at a share price of ₹237. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's P/E ratio?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at a P/E of 25.9×, at the most expensive it has been in 0 years, against a long-run median of 0.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.

Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 2 of its last 6 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 25.9× sits at the most expensive it has been in 0 years (long-run median 0.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd growing?

Yes — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +17.6% year on year, profit +52.6%, and the margin +8.0 pp at 30.0%. The 5-year compound rates are 9.2% (revenue) and 14.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.

How is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd performing?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 18 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 18 of stage 2), trading +16.7% versus its 200-day average and at 58% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 4 months the stock moved +31% against the NIFTY 500's +3% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.

Will Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹237, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 18 weeks in. Its P/E of 25.9× sits at the 100th percentile of its own 0-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.

Who owns Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd?

Promoters hold 85.0% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd, foreign institutions 0.5%, domestic institutions 7.8% and the public 6.6% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 14 August 2026.

Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd have too much debt?

No — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00. FY26 borrowings were ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's capex?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd spent ₹126 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. Depreciation over the same years was ₹100 Cr. — as of 14 August 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash flow?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd generated ₹716 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹651 Cr of free cash flow after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹613 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.

Where is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in its business cycle?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 34.0%, against a 6-year band of 28.0%–42.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 30.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.

What could break the Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI