Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-25
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-25

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd

CMPDI
Miscellaneous

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the price is already 24 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (24 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +52.6% year on year, and 92% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Price
₹210
P/E
23.0×
56th pctile
of its own 0-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹481 Cr
+17.6% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹116 Cr
+52.6% YoY
Operating margin
30.0%
+8.0 pp YoY
ROCE
38%
FY26
ROIC
68.8%
vs WACC 12.0% → +56.8 pp
Cash conversion
92%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹210, in a confirmed uptrend and 24 weeks into that stage. That is +0.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 30% of a 52-week range of ₹181 to ₹278. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (9 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 24 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹210 it trades +0.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 30% of its 52-week range (₹181–₹278).

Sep 26: ₹210 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+0.8% versus the 200-day line, week 24 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2₹287₹252₹216₹181₹145₹₹210₹209Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26Aug 26Sep 26
S2₹287₹252₹216₹181₹145₹₹210₹209Apr 26Jun 26Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2026 Each cell is one week from 2026 to now (29 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Apr 26Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 5 months the stock moved +16% while the NIFTY 500 moved −2% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at 23.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 0.1×, measured across 0.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 23.0× is mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile), against a long-run median of 0.1× measured over 0.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 23.0× vs a 0.1× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 0.4-year window; loss-period spikes above 0.3× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
0.32×₹2,6770.26×₹2,0080.20×₹1,3390.14×₹6690.08×₹0.0×₹0.30×₹9May 26Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26
0.32×₹2,6770.26×₹2,0080.20×₹1,3390.14×₹6690.08×₹0.0×₹0.30×₹9May 26Jul 26Sep 26
P/E
23.0×
56th percentile of 0y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +10.2% in FY26, profit −8.1% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
29%83%16%34%3.1%−15%−9.7%−64%−22%−113%%%10.2%−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
29%83%16%34%3.1%−15%−9.7%−64%−22%−113%%%10.2%−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfit
18%59%16%35%15%10%13%−14%11%−39%%%17.6%52.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
18%59%16%35%15%10%13%−14%11%−39%%%17.6%52.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
54%48%43%37%31%%38%FY23FY24FY26
54%48%43%37%31%%38%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Steady high
latest 38.0% · span 33.0%–52.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+10.2%+18.7%+9.2%—
Profit−8.1%+27.3%+14.1%—
EPS−99.8%−83.9%−67.1%—
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+17.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+52.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
9.2%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

63.4/100 — rank 31 of 37 in Miscellaneous · 40% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd scores 63.4 out of 100 against the 37 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 31. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.4 + 20.6 + 10.4 + 10 = 63.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported ₹481 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 9.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,317 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,246 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2% on the year), capping 5 years at 9.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹481 Cr, +17.6% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
9.2% a year over 5 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.5k29%1.9k16%1.3k3.1%626−9.7%0−22%₹ Cr%₹2,31710.2%FY21FY23FY26
2.5k29%1.9k16%1.3k3.1%626−9.7%0−22%₹ Cr%₹2,31710.2%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹481 Cr (+17.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
89318%67016%44715%22313%011%₹ Cr%₹48117.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
89318%67016%44715%22313%011%₹ Cr%₹48117.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +14.7% growth against the decade's 9.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's operating margin is 30.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +8.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved −15.0 percentage points. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0% to 42.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 30.0%, +8.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0%–42.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −14.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.2 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 34.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 6-year window.
within a 28.0–42.0% band over 6 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
43%16%39%9.8%35%4.0%31%−1.8%27%−7.6%%%34%−6%FY21FY23FY26
43%16%39%9.8%35%4.0%31%−1.8%27%−7.6%%%34%−6%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: 30.0% operating margin (+8.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
47%9.9%40%3.0%34%−4.0%27%−11%20%−18%%%30%8%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
47%9.9%40%3.0%34%−4.0%27%−11%20%−18%%%30%8%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The 5-year compound rate is 14.1%. That is 24.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹277 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹116 Cr, +52.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹613 Cr (−8.1%), and the 5-year compound rate is 14.1%.

FY26 profit ₹613 Cr (−8.1% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 6-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
14.1% a year over 5 years
Net profitYoY growth
72076%54053%36029%1805.9%0−17%₹ Cr%₹613−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
72076%54053%36029%1805.9%0−17%₹ Cr%₹613−8.1%FY21FY23FY26
Jun 26: ₹116 Cr (+52.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
29959%22435%15010%75−14%0−39%₹ Cr%₹11652.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
29959%22435%15010%75−14%0−39%₹ Cr%₹11652.6%Mar 25Dec 25Jun 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹716 Cr of operating cash against ₹613 Cr of profit. After ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹651 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹651 Cr after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 92% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹716 Cr vs profit ₹613 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 6-year window, annual resolution.
92% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
7735803871930₹ Cr₹716₹613₹651FY21FY23FY26
7735803871930₹ Cr₹716₹613₹651FY21FY23FY26
FY26: CFO = 117% of profit (three-year rate 92%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
143%111%80%49%17%%117%FY21FY23FY26
143%111%80%49%17%%117%FY21FY23FY26

Why conversion sits at 92%: the cash cycle tightened 50 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 169 days in FY26, down from 219 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr, so roughly ₹1,073 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 169 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 169 days, tighter than FY21's 219.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr — so the 169-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,073 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 169-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 6-year window.
−50 days vs FY21
Cash cycleDebtor days
253229205181157days169d169dFY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
253229205181157days169d169dFY21FY23FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹126 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹100 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹42.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹65.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹42.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
705335180₹ Cr₹65₹42FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
705335180₹ Cr₹65₹42FY22FY24FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earns a ROCE of 38% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 33% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +56.8 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 26.5% net margin on 0.71× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 38%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 33% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 26.5% net margin × 0.71× asset turns × 1.43× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 26.9% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 68.8% − 12.0% = a +56.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.

FY26: ROCE 38% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's 33%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
55%44%32%20%8.8%%38%42.3%FY22FY24FY26
55%44%32%20%8.8%%38%42.3%FY22FY24FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 26.7% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 3 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
28%24%19%15%11%%26.7%19.7%Q4 FY25Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
28%24%19%15%11%%26.7%19.7%Q4 FY25Q4 FY26Q1 FY27
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd carries ₹1.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹2,283 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹126 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

FY26: borrowings ₹1.0 Cr at 0.00× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 6-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
debt is falling while the business grows
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
2.21.2×1.60.6×1.10.0×0.5−0.6×0.0−1.2×₹ Cr×₹10.00×FY21FY22FY23FY24FY26
2.21.2×1.60.6×1.10.0×0.5−0.6×0.0−1.2×₹ Cr×₹10.00×FY21FY23FY26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — .

A quiet register: no holder moved a full point in two years Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 2 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
92%67%43%18%−6.3%%85%0.5%7.8%6.6%Mar 26Jun 26
92%67%43%18%−6.3%%85%0.5%7.8%6.6%Mar 26Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Miscellaneous
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY 70.8/100Favorable setup87% evidence FADING 27.5/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence 19.1/25 ROCE 18.6% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 5% · 1Y 7.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.5 + 19.1 + 14.2 + 10 = 70.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Sagility LtdSAGILITY 66.8/100Favorable setup87% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.3/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 15.4/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 1.07 65% evidence 13.3/20 RS sector 7% · RS bench 1.6% · 1Y -3.7%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.3 + 15.4 + 13.8 + 13.3 = 66.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Exhicon Events Media Solutions Ltd543895 64.6/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence 20.4/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y 7.9%4 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 20.4 + 12.5 + 12.9 = 64.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Anlon Technology Solutions LtdANLON 64.6/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence 23.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 48% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 27.1% · OPM 20% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 41.7× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 61.6% · 1Y — 25% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 19.6 + 9.4 + 12.5 = 64.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Global Education LtdGLOBAL 63.3/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.9/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 3.3% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence 20.0/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 41% 95% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.2/20 RS sector 35.6% · RS bench 43.8% · 1Y 96.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 20 + 10.2 + 19.2 = 63.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 43.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
6Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER 58.8/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence FADING 19.3/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence 11.8/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 23.4% · RS bench 30.2% · 1Y 46.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 14.6 + 11.8 + 13.1 = 58.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7IIRM Holdings India Ltd526530 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence FADING 15.9/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 1.1 pp 95% evidence 19.1/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.6% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 22.6% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 52%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 19.1 + 10.1 + 13.1 = 58.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 29.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER 57.3/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence TURNING 22.4/35 Revenue -9.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.2 pp 95% evidence 8.2/25 ROCE 6% · OPM -35.6% 95% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.3/20 RS sector 4.9% · RS bench 11.4% · 1Y 17.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 8.2 + 9.4 + 17.3 = 57.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Take LtdTAKE 56.6/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence 23.9/35 Revenue — · PAT -68.2% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 52% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 18.5% · OPM -0.9% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector 69.8% · RS bench -48.7% · 1Y 46.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.9 + 10.6 + 10 + 12.1 = 56.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence 22.2/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change 2.6 pp 95% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 10.4% 95% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -16.7% · 1Y —4 of 5 weeks ahead to 2026-08-16 25% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 8.2 = 56.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK 55.5/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.7/35 Revenue 25.9% · PAT 40.9% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 77% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 118× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector — · RS bench 22.4% · 1Y 18.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 13.1 + 9 + 11.7 = 55.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN 54.0/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence TURNING 19.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 10.7% · OPM 9% 95% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 127× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.4/20 RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 46%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 11.5 + 8.8 + 14.4 = 54 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN 49.7/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence TURNING 20.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 95% evidence 8.8/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 80% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 101× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y 10.1%1 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 8.8 + 9.1 + 11.3 = 49.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 22.3/35 Revenue 38.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 184× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench 0.8% · 1Y 5.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 10.9 + 8.6 + 7.3 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence BASING 19.6/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT -40.4% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 15% 95% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 17.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -8.4% · RS bench -18% · 1Y -40.5%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 11.2 + 11 + 6.4 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 13.3/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -1.7% · 1Y -23.8%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 13.3 + 8.2 + 7.6 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17TCC Concept LtdTCC 46.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BASING 16.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence 14.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -17.7% · RS bench -35% · 1Y -90.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 11.5 + 14.4 + 4.5 = 46.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence TURNING 20.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 15 pp 95% evidence 10.0/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM 98% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y -6.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 10 + 10 + 6.6 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence BASING 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2358 pp 71% evidence 18.8/25 ROCE 131% · OPM 58% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 663× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.6/20 RS sector -78.9% · RS bench -77.4% · 1Y -81.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 18.8 + 8.5 + 0.6 = 46.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 22.0/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -13.2 pp 95% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 56.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.8/20 RS sector -10% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -8.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22 + 9.1 + 9.6 + 4.8 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence BASING 23.9/35 Revenue 23.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 95% evidence 4.9/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -14% 95% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 60.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y -28.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.9 + 4.9 + 9.5 + 3.6 = 41.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20% and the one-year return is -28.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
22TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 10.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 24.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y -16.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.7 + 9.3 + 10.3 + 10.3 = 40.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 9.4/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence 8.4/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 18% 95% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench 18.2% · 1Y -9.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.4 + 8.4 + 12.5 + 8.3 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24GKW LtdGKWLIMITED 38.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 10.5/35 Revenue -13.5% · PAT 0% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 84% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -6.9%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 8.9 + 10 + 9 = 38.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Unitech LtdUNITECH 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence BASING 17.8/35 Revenue 45.3% · PAT -10% · OPM change 15 pp 71% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 6% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -23.2% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -46.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.8 + 3.5 + 10 + 5.7 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS 35.8/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence 9.0/35 Revenue -17.1% · PAT 35.9% · OPM change -19 pp 71% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM -8% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 9.5% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y -10.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9 + 3 + 10 + 13.8 = 35.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 2.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
27Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL 34.6/100Adverse evidence94% evidence BASING 11.0/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -21.7% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 40% 100% evidence 3.8/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 3.12 100% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y -32.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11 + 14.2 + 3.8 + 5.6 = 34.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28Stanley Lifestyles LtdSTANLEY 29.4/100Adverse evidence74% evidence TURNING 6.0/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.4 pp 95% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 17.3% 95% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 119× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -43.8% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -51.9%3 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 6 + 10.7 + 8.9 + 3.8 = 29.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Embassy Developments LtdEMBDL 27.9/100Adverse evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 5.9/35 Revenue -46.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -58.4 pp 71% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -60% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y -42%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 5.9 + 3.4 + 10 + 8.6 = 27.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
30RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA 17.4/100Adverse evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 2.6/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -23.9 pp 100% evidence 1.1/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM 2.1% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.7/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -52.5%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 2.6 + 1.1 + 10 + 3.7 = 17.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
31Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltdthis pageCMPDI 63.4/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence ASLEEP 22.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 34% evidence 20.6/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 100% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 11 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 20.6 + 10.4 + 10 = 63.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
32Fabtech Cleanrooms Ltd544332 57.0/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 26% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 19.4% · OPM 12% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 41.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y —10 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.2 + 9.9 + 12.3 = 57 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
33Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 54.2/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 12.1% · OPM 26% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 52.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 58.1% · 1Y —6 of 8 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 14.8 + 9.7 + 12.4 = 54.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
34Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 26% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 25.8% 95% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 133× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.4/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench 25.9% · 1Y 5.8%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 15.7 + 8.7 + 9.4 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
35Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 8.9 + 10 + 12.1 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
36Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE 49.1/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.4/35 Revenue 38.9% · PAT 30.4% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 61% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 10.3% · 1Y -16.4%6 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.3 + 10 + 11.4 = 49.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
37Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 15.8% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 71.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 6.5 + 9.3 + 10 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price today?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹210. The company is valued at ₹15,008 Cr. The stock sits at 30% of its 52-week range of ₹181–₹278, +0.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 24 weeks in. — as of 25 September 2026.

What were Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr and net profit of ₹116 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.63. The operating margin was 30.0%, 8.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's revenue?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 9.2% a year. — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The operating margin ran 30.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market cap?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹15,008 Cr at a share price of ₹210. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's P/E ratio?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at a P/E of 23.0×, at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range, against a long-run median of 0.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 25 September 2026.

Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 2 of its last 6 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd looks mid-range: its P/E of 23.0× sits at the 56th percentile of its 0-year range (long-run median 0.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd growing?

Yes — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +17.6% year on year, profit +52.6%, and the margin +8.0 pp at 30.0%. The 5-year compound rates are 9.2% (revenue) and 14.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 25 September 2026.

How is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd performing?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 24 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 9 weeks. — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 24 of stage 2), trading +0.8% versus its 200-day average and at 30% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 5 months the stock moved +16% against the NIFTY 500's −2% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 25 September 2026.

Will Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹210, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 24 weeks in. Its P/E of 23.0× sits at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range. — as of 25 September 2026.

Who owns Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd?

Promoters hold 85.0% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd, foreign institutions 0.5%, domestic institutions 7.8% and the public 6.6% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 25 September 2026.

Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd have too much debt?

No — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00. FY26 borrowings were ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's capex?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd spent ₹126 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. Depreciation over the same years was ₹100 Cr. — as of 25 September 2026.

What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash flow?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd generated ₹716 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹651 Cr of free cash flow after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹613 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 25 September 2026.

Where is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in its business cycle?

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 34.0%, against a 6-year band of 28.0%–42.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 30.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 25 September 2026.

What could break the Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd story?

Biggest watch item: the price is already 24 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 25 September 2026.

Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 25 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-25. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI