Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd
CMPDICentral Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 24 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (24 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +52.6% year on year, and 92% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹210, in a confirmed uptrend and 24 weeks into that stage. That is +0.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 30% of a 52-week range of ₹181 to ₹278. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (9 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 24 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹210 it trades +0.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 30% of its 52-week range (₹181–₹278).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 5 months the stock moved +16% while the NIFTY 500 moved −2% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at 23.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 0.1×, measured across 0.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 23.0× is mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile), against a long-run median of 0.1× measured over 0.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +10.2% | +18.7% | +9.2% | — |
| Profit | −8.1% | +27.3% | +14.1% | — |
| EPS | −99.8% | −83.9% | −67.1% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
63.4/100 — rank 31 of 37 in Miscellaneous · 40% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd scores 63.4 out of 100 against the 37 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 31. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.4 + 20.6 + 10.4 + 10 = 63.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported ₹481 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 9.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,317 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,246 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2% on the year), capping 5 years at 9.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹481 Cr, +17.6% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +14.7% growth against the decade's 9.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's operating margin is 30.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +8.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved −15.0 percentage points. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0% to 42.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 30.0%, +8.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 28.0%–42.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −14.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.2 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The 5-year compound rate is 14.1%. That is 24.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹277 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹116 Cr, +52.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹613 Cr (−8.1%), and the 5-year compound rate is 14.1%.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹716 Cr of operating cash against ₹613 Cr of profit. After ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹651 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹651 Cr after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 92% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 92%: the cash cycle tightened 50 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 169 days in FY26, down from 219 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr, so roughly ₹1,073 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 169 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 169 days, tighter than FY21's 219.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,317 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹6.3 Cr — so the 169-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,073 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹126 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹100 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹42.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earns a ROCE of 38% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 33% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +56.8 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 26.5% net margin on 0.71× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 38%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 33% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 26.5% net margin × 0.71× asset turns × 1.43× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 26.9% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 68.8% − 12.0% = a +56.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd carries ₹1.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹2,283 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹126 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1.0 Cr to ₹1.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹126 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — .
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY | 70.8/100Favorable setup87% evidence | FADING | 27.5/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 18.6% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 5% · 1Y 7.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.5 + 19.1 + 14.2 + 10 = 70.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Sagility LtdSAGILITY | 66.8/100Favorable setup87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.3/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 1.07 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector 7% · RS bench 1.6% · 1Y -3.7%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 15.4 + 13.8 + 13.3 = 66.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Exhicon Events Media Solutions Ltd543895 | 64.6/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence | 20.4/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y 7.9%4 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 20.4 + 12.5 + 12.9 = 64.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Anlon Technology Solutions LtdANLON | 64.6/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | 23.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 48% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 27.1% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 41.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 61.6% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 19.6 + 9.4 + 12.5 = 64.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Global Education LtdGLOBAL | 63.3/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.9/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 3.3% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence | 20.0/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 41% 95% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 35.6% · RS bench 43.8% · 1Y 96.9%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 20 + 10.2 + 19.2 = 63.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 43.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 6Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER | 58.8/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | FADING | 19.3/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 9.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 23.4% · RS bench 30.2% · 1Y 46.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 14.6 + 11.8 + 13.1 = 58.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7IIRM Holdings India Ltd526530 | 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | FADING | 15.9/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 1.1 pp 95% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.6% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 22.6% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 52%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 19.1 + 10.1 + 13.1 = 58.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 29.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 8Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER | 57.3/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 22.4/35 Revenue -9.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.2 pp 95% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 6% · OPM -35.6% 95% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.3/20 RS sector 4.9% · RS bench 11.4% · 1Y 17.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 8.2 + 9.4 + 17.3 = 57.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Take LtdTAKE | 56.6/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | 23.9/35 Revenue — · PAT -68.2% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 52% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 18.5% · OPM -0.9% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 38.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 69.8% · RS bench -48.7% · 1Y 46.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 23.9 + 10.6 + 10 + 12.1 = 56.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY | 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | 22.2/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change 2.6 pp 95% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 10.4% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench -16.7% · 1Y —4 of 5 weeks ahead to 2026-08-16 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 8.2 = 56.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK | 55.5/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.7/35 Revenue 25.9% · PAT 40.9% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 77% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 118× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector — · RS bench 22.4% · 1Y 18.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 13.1 + 9 + 11.7 = 55.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN | 54.0/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | TURNING | 19.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 10.7% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 127× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 46%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 11.5 + 8.8 + 14.4 = 54 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN | 49.7/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | TURNING | 20.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 95% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 80% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 101× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y 10.1%1 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 8.8 + 9.1 + 11.3 = 49.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT | 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.3/35 Revenue 38.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 184× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench 0.8% · 1Y 5.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 10.9 + 8.6 + 7.3 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | BASING | 19.6/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT -40.4% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 17.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -8.4% · RS bench -18% · 1Y -40.5%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 11.2 + 11 + 6.4 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -1.7% · 1Y -23.8%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 13.3 + 8.2 + 7.6 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17TCC Concept LtdTCC | 46.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 16.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -17.7% · RS bench -35% · 1Y -90.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 11.5 + 14.4 + 4.5 = 46.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | TURNING | 20.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 15 pp 95% evidence | 10.0/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM 98% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -16.5% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y -6.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 10 + 10 + 6.6 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON | 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | BASING | 18.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2358 pp 71% evidence | 18.8/25 ROCE 131% · OPM 58% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 663× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.6/20 RS sector -78.9% · RS bench -77.4% · 1Y -81.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 18.8 + 8.5 + 0.6 = 46.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN | 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.0/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -13.2 pp 95% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 56.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -10% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y -8.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22 + 9.1 + 9.6 + 4.8 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | BASING | 23.9/35 Revenue 23.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 95% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -14% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 60.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y -28.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.9 + 4.9 + 9.5 + 3.6 = 41.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -20% and the one-year return is -28.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 22TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT | 40.6/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 24.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y -16.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 9.3 + 10.3 + 10.3 = 40.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 9.4/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench 18.2% · 1Y -9.2%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.4 + 8.4 + 12.5 + 8.3 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24GKW LtdGKWLIMITED | 38.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.5/35 Revenue -13.5% · PAT 0% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 84% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -6.9%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.5 + 8.9 + 10 + 9 = 38.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Unitech LtdUNITECH | 37.0/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | BASING | 17.8/35 Revenue 45.3% · PAT -10% · OPM change 15 pp 71% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 6% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -23.2% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -46.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 3.5 + 10 + 5.7 = 37 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS | 35.8/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | 9.0/35 Revenue -17.1% · PAT 35.9% · OPM change -19 pp 71% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM -8% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 9.5% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y -10.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 9 + 3 + 10 + 13.8 = 35.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 2.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 27Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL | 34.6/100Adverse evidence94% evidence | BASING | 11.0/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -21.7% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 40% 100% evidence | 3.8/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 3.12 100% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y -32.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11 + 14.2 + 3.8 + 5.6 = 34.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Stanley Lifestyles LtdSTANLEY | 29.4/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 6.0/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.4 pp 95% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 17.3% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 119× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -43.8% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -51.9%3 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6 + 10.7 + 8.9 + 3.8 = 29.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Embassy Developments LtdEMBDL | 27.9/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 5.9/35 Revenue -46.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -58.4 pp 71% evidence | 3.4/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -60% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y -42%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.9 + 3.4 + 10 + 8.6 = 27.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA | 17.4/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.6/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -23.9 pp 100% evidence | 1.1/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM 2.1% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -52.5%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.6 + 1.1 + 10 + 3.7 = 17.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 31Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltdthis pageCMPDI | 63.4/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 34% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 11 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 20.6 + 10.4 + 10 = 63.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 32Fabtech Cleanrooms Ltd544332 | 57.0/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 26% evidence | 17.2/25 ROCE 19.4% · OPM 12% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 41.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 53.2% · 1Y —10 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 17.2 + 9.9 + 12.3 = 57 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 33Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 | 54.2/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 12.1% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 52.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 58.1% · 1Y —6 of 8 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 14.8 + 9.7 + 12.4 = 54.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL | 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 26% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 25.8% 95% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 133× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench 25.9% · 1Y 5.8%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 15.7 + 8.7 + 9.4 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 35Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 | 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 8.9 + 10 + 12.1 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE | 49.1/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.4/35 Revenue 38.9% · PAT 30.4% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 61% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 10.3% · 1Y -16.4%6 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.3 + 10 + 11.4 = 49.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 37Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 15.8% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 71.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 6.5 + 9.3 + 10 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price today?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at ₹210. The company is valued at ₹15,008 Cr. The stock sits at 30% of its 52-week range of ₹181–₹278, +0.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 24 weeks in. — as of 25 September 2026.
What were Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr and net profit of ₹116 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.63. The operating margin was 30.0%, 8.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's revenue?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd reported revenue of ₹481 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +17.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,317 Cr (+10.2%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 9.2% a year. — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd earned ₹116 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +52.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹613 Cr. The operating margin ran 30.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market cap?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹15,008 Cr at a share price of ₹210. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's P/E ratio?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd trades at a P/E of 23.0×, at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range, against a long-run median of 0.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 25 September 2026.
Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 2 of its last 6 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd looks mid-range: its P/E of 23.0× sits at the 56th percentile of its 0-year range (long-run median 0.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd growing?
Yes — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +17.6% year on year, profit +52.6%, and the margin +8.0 pp at 30.0%. The 5-year compound rates are 9.2% (revenue) and 14.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 25 September 2026.
How is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd performing?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 24 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 17.6% and profit rose 52.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 9 weeks. — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 24 of stage 2), trading +0.8% versus its 200-day average and at 30% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (9 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 5 months the stock moved +16% against the NIFTY 500's −2% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 25 September 2026.
Will Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹210, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 24 weeks in. Its P/E of 23.0× sits at the 56th percentile of its own 0-year range. — as of 25 September 2026.
Who owns Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd?
Promoters hold 85.0% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd, foreign institutions 0.5%, domestic institutions 7.8% and the public 6.6% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 25 September 2026.
Does Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd have too much debt?
No — Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00. FY26 borrowings were ₹1.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,283 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's capex?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd spent ₹126 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. Depreciation over the same years was ₹100 Cr. — as of 25 September 2026.
What is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's cash flow?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd generated ₹716 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹651 Cr of free cash flow after ₹65.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹613 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 92% of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹716 Cr against reported profit of ₹613 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 25 September 2026.
Where is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd in its business cycle?
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 34.0%, against a 6-year band of 28.0%–42.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 30.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 25 September 2026.
What could break the Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 24 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 25 September 2026.
Is Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 25 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!