Embassy Developments Ltd
EMBDLEmbassy Developments Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −40.6% in a year against EPS −485.3% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −40.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −485.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a downtrend (69 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 89th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −362.6% year on year, and 588% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Embassy Developments Ltd trades at ₹61.1, in a downtrend and 69 weeks into that stage. That is −12.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 33% of a 52-week range of ₹42 to ₹100. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 69 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹61.1 it trades −12.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 33% of its 52-week range (₹42–₹100).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +32% while the NIFTY 500 moved +282% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Embassy Developments Ltd trades at 41.1× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (89th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 13.7×, measured across 9.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 41.1× is at the pricey end of its own range (89th percentile), against a long-run median of 13.7× measured over 9.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −485.3% against a −40.6% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −16.6%/yr price move, ~−7.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−8.9 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 341% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Embassy Developments Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −20.6% | +43.4% | +2.6% | −5.2% |
| Share price | −40.6% | −3.8% | −16.6% | −4.0% |
4-Factor Sector Score
26.2/100 — rank 27 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 68% evidence confidence
Embassy Developments Ltd scores 26.2 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 27. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 4.3 + 3.6 + 10 + 8.3 = 26.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Embassy Developments Ltd reported ₹342 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −61.5% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −5.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,732 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,729 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,732 Cr (−20.6% on the year), capping 10 years at −5.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹342 Cr, −61.5% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −13.3% growth against the decade's −5.2% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −20.7% over the last 4 quarters against +49.6%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Embassy Developments Ltd's operating margin is −76.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −76.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −103.0% to 73.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −76.0%, −76.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −103.0%–73.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −77.1 pp year on year while gross margin went −25.9 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Embassy Developments Ltd posted a net loss of ₹323 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹872 Cr. That loss is 94.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹123 Cr. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was ₹−323 Cr, −362.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−872 Cr (−549.5%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 588% of Embassy Developments Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹44.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−872 Cr of profit. After ₹139 Cr of capital spending, ₹−95.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹44.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−872 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−95.0 Cr after ₹139 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 588% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 588%: the cash cycle stretched 76 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 83.5× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Embassy Developments Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 2,617 days in FY26, up from 2,541 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹6,180 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,732 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹4.7 Cr, so roughly ₹12,418 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 5 days, inventory at 2,824 days — roughly 92.9 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 2,617 days, looser than FY21's 2,541.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 2,824 days to sell; customers pay about 5 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 212 days — netting out to the 2,617-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,732 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹4.7 Cr — so the 2,617-day loop keeps roughly ₹12,418 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹6,180 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹74.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹1.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Embassy Developments Ltd earns a ROCE of −2% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −11% in FY24. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −50.3% net margin on 0.08× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is −2%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −11% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −50.3% net margin × 0.08× asset turns × 2.18× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −8.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 341% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Embassy Developments Ltd carries ₹5,322 Cr of borrowings against ₹9,868 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.54. Operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1,223 Cr to ₹5,322 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹6,180 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹5,322 Cr against equity of ₹9,868 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.54. Operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹1,223 Cr to ₹5,322 Cr while capital spending ran ₹6,180 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 341% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters added 42.6 points of Embassy Developments Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 42.6% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −5.5 points over the same window, to 23.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: +42.6 points over 8 quarters to 42.6%; Foreign institutions: −5.5 points over 8 quarters to 23.4%; Domestic institutions: −0.4 points over 8 quarters to 3.0%.
Why the register moved: promoters drove it (+42.6 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (−5.5 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Embassy Developments Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1IIRM Holdings India Ltd526530 | 66.2/100Favorable setup71% evidence | LEADER | 17.7/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 8.4 pp 83% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.8% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 40.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 49.6% · RS bench 53.5% · 1Y 67.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 19.1 + 9.7 + 19.7 = 66.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Sagility LtdSAGILITY | 66.1/100Favorable setup87% evidence | TURNING | 24.4/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 19.8× · PEG 1.05 65% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector 7.2% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -1.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 15.5 + 14.2 + 12 = 66.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY | 65.2/100Favorable setup75% evidence | TURNING | 24.8/35 Revenue 35.2% · PAT 87% · OPM change 4.3 pp 59% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 8% 95% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 28.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.6/20 RS sector 16.1% · RS bench 19.4% · 1Y 16.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.8 + 12.3 + 10.5 + 17.6 = 65.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Exhicon Events Media Solutions Ltd543895 | 64.4/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector 2.2% · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y -7.8%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 20.1 + 13.6 + 11.4 = 64.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.8/35 Revenue 42.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 65% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 534× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 3.3% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 17.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 14.2 + 8.6 + 14.2 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence | LEADER | 16.8/35 Revenue 20.4% · PAT 4.9% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 24.8% · RS bench 28.1% · 1Y 16%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 16 + 8.1 + 18.4 = 59.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 28.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Global Education LtdGLOBAL | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.6/35 Revenue 29.9% · PAT -5.5% · OPM change 7.5 pp 83% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 47% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 20× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 56.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 19.4 + 10.8 + 12.5 = 59.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Take Solutions LtdTAKE | 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | 25.1/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 57% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 3222× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 68% · RS bench 71.4% · 1Y 305.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 25.1 + 8.3 + 8.5 + 17 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY | 58.5/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 22.5/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 21.1% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 22% 95% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector — · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 16.9 + 10.4 + 8.7 = 58.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD | 57.6/100Mixed-positive evidence70% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.1/35 Revenue -0.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 10.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y -1.9%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 15.3 + 11.5 + 6.7 = 57.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.2% and the one-year return is -1.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 11Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK | 56.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 21.4/35 Revenue 25.6% · PAT 76.7% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 74% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 104× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 22% · 1Y 13%5 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.4 + 9.1 + 12.1 = 56 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN | 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 123× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y 94.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 11.7 + 9 + 13.9 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.7/35 Revenue 24.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -4.1% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 66× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -8.6% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y -1.1%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 9.5 + 9.3 + 7.2 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 17.6/35 Revenue 8.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -3% · 1Y -19.9%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 14.9 + 8.1 + 7.7 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15TCC Concept LtdTCC | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -35% · 1Y -44.2%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.4 + 14.1 + 4.5 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16GKW LtdGKWLIMITED | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT 87.5% · OPM change 2160.4 pp 83% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM — 80% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -5% · 1Y -8.8%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.7 + 10 + 9.3 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER | 43.4/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 62% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 6.1% · OPM 34.5% 95% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 59.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -20.5% · 1Y -0.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 11.2 + 9.6 + 1.4 = 43.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT | 41.5/100Mixed-negative evidence67% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change -1015.9 pp 83% evidence | 5.9/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM -932.6% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector 6.3% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 23.1%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 5.9 + 10 + 11 = 41.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON | 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.7/35 Revenue 30.8% · PAT -52.5% · OPM change -2377.7 pp 48% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 39.2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 168.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -41.3% · RS bench -74.1% · 1Y -68.5%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 16.8 + 8.7 + 3.2 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL | 41.2/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 15.9% · PAT 5% · OPM change 3 pp 65% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM -15% 100% evidence | 5.1/20 P/E 13.6× · PEG 2.98 100% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y -30.4%5 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.6 + 5.1 + 5.4 = 41.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT | 40.8/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.1/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 23.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 9.4 + 10.3 + 10 = 40.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.2/35 Revenue -6.5% · PAT -66.4% · OPM change -5 pp 83% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench -11.6% · 1Y -28.9%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.2 + 9.6 + 12.5 + 5.3 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL | 33.7/100Adverse evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -284.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -349.6% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 66.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y -19.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 4.7 + 9.2 + 4.2 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Unitech LtdUNITECH | 32.0/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.8/35 Revenue 59% · PAT 5% · OPM change -584 pp 62% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 184% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -24.8% · 1Y -42.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 6.1 + 10 + 3.1 = 32 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Stanley Lifestyles LtdSTANLEY | 31.5/100Adverse evidence70% evidence | TURNING | 8.4/35 Revenue -1.6% · PAT -55.5% · OPM change -5.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 14.9% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 62.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -43.7% · RS bench -23.7% · 1Y -53.6%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.4 + 10.3 + 9.5 + 3.3 = 31.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA | 29.3/100Adverse evidence62% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.8/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change 19 pp 65% evidence | 1.6/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -6% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -32.1% · RS bench -23% · 1Y -45%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.8 + 1.6 + 10 + 3.9 = 29.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Embassy Developments Ltdthis pageEMBDL | 26.2/100Adverse evidence68% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 4.3/35 Revenue -20.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -76.9 pp 83% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -76% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y -45.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.3 + 3.6 + 10 + 8.3 = 26.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Central Mine Planning & Design Institute LtdCMPDI | 62.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | TURNING | 22.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 32% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 26.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 19.8 + 10.1 + 10 = 62.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29FlySBS Aviation LtdFLYSBS | 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | TURNING | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -8 pp 26% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 32.5% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 4.4%3 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 18.9 + 11.4 + 9 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 | 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 33.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector — · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y — 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 15 + 9.8 + 11.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 31Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL | 51.9/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | TURNING | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.6 pp 19% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 29% 95% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 144× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -16.1% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y -8.1%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.7 + 8.9 + 8.9 = 51.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 32Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 9 + 10 + 12.3 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 33Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE | 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.9/35 Revenue 36.9% · PAT 23.6% · OPM change 5 pp 62% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 62% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -20.2%2 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 9.6 + 10 + 8.8 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.4/35 Revenue 76.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 62% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 75.5% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector — · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 9.6%4 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 8.9 + 10 + 11.4 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 35Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS | 44.6/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 14.1/35 Revenue -20% · PAT 69.8% · OPM change -8 pp 40% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 8% 71% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 8.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 5.7 + 10 + 14.8 = 44.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 | 42.6/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | TURNING | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT -80% · OPM change — 50% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 6.3 + 10 + 10 = 42.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's share price today?
Embassy Developments Ltd trades at ₹61.1, −40.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹8,502 Cr. The stock sits at 33% of its 52-week range of ₹42–₹100, −12.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 69 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Embassy Developments Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Embassy Developments Ltd reported revenue of ₹342 Cr and a net loss of ₹323 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue fell 61.5% and profit fell 362.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹−2.33. The operating margin was −76.0%, 76.9 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's revenue?
Embassy Developments Ltd reported revenue of ₹342 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, −61.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,732 Cr (−20.6%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −5.2% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's profit?
Embassy Developments Ltd earned ₹−323 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −362.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−872 Cr. The operating margin ran −76.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's market cap?
Embassy Developments Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹8,502 Cr at a share price of ₹61.1. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's P/E ratio?
Embassy Developments Ltd trades at a P/E of 41.1×, at the 89th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 13.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Embassy Developments Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Embassy Developments Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 1 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Embassy Developments Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 41.1× sits at the 89th percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 13.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd growing?
Not right now — Embassy Developments Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −61.5% year on year, profit −362.6%, and the margin −76.9 pp at −76.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Embassy Developments Ltd performing?
Embassy Developments Ltd is in a downtrend, 69 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 61.5% and profit fell 362.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 69 of stage 4), trading −12.8% versus its 200-day average and at 33% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Embassy Developments Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +32% against the NIFTY 500's +282% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Embassy Developments Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Embassy Developments Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹61.1, the price is in a downtrend 69 weeks in. Its P/E of 41.1× sits at the 89th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Embassy Developments Ltd?
Promoters hold 42.6% of Embassy Developments Ltd, foreign institutions 23.4%, domestic institutions 3.0% and the public 30.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters added 42.6 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Embassy Developments Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Embassy Developments Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.54, and operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹5,322 Cr against equity of ₹9,868 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's capex?
Embassy Developments Ltd spent ₹6,180 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹139 Cr, with ₹1.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Embassy Developments Ltd's cash flow?
Embassy Developments Ltd generated ₹44.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−95.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹139 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−872 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 588% of Embassy Developments Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹44.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−872 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Embassy Developments Ltd in its business cycle?
Embassy Developments Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −27.0%, against a 13-year band of −103.0%–73.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −76.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Embassy Developments Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −40.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −485.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Embassy Developments Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Embassy Developments Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −40.6% in a year against EPS −485.3% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.