Stanley Lifestyles Ltd
STANLEYStanley Lifestyles Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work.
The price is in a downtrend (97 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −91.6% year on year, and 259% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd trades at ₹136, in a downtrend and 97 weeks into that stage. That is −23.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 3% of a 52-week range of ₹131 to ₹301. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (5 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 97 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹136 it trades −23.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 3% of its 52-week range (₹131–₹301).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2.2 years the stock moved −71% while the NIFTY 500 moved +0% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-07) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd trades at 112.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 58.8×, measured across 2.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 112.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile), against a long-run median of 58.8× measured over 2.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −58.4% against a −55.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
What the price assumes This reading works the multiple backwards. It asks one question: what yearly rate of profit growth is a buyer at the market price already paying for? The number is the growth rate that makes eleven years of profit — six years growing, then five fading — add up to that day's market price, once each year is discounted at 11% a year.
Solved at its 13 June 2026 price, Stanley Lifestyles Ltd was paying for profit growth of about 33.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 8.4% a year over the past 6 years. Today the market pays 112.0× P/E, the 97th percentile of its own 2-year range.
What the two numbers say together. The multiple is full against its own past, and the growth the price is paying for is far above what this company has actually delivered.
How to hold this number: it is a reading of one day's price, taken on 13 June 2026, not a running figure — every other number on this page, the multiple included, is read off the live quote as of 11 September 2026. A higher price is paying for more growth and a lower price for less, so it moves whenever the price does, and this page does not restate it between measurements.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −8.6% latest (single-quarter readings) against +23.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 6.0%. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −1.6% | +0.0% | +16.4% | — |
| Profit | −55.2% | −28.1% | +45.4% | — |
| EPS | −58.4% | −63.8% | +8.7% | — |
| Share price | −55.0% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
30.0/100 — rank 26 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 74% evidence confidence
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd scores 30.0 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 26. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 6.6 + 10.8 + 9.2 + 3.4 = 30. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd reported ₹99.3 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −8.6% year on year. Over 6 years it has compounded at 12.6% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹419 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹410 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹419 Cr (−1.6% on the year), capping 6 years at 12.6% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹99.3 Cr, −8.6% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −5.4% growth against the decade's 12.6% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −5.6% over the last 4 quarters against −3.2%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −82.2% vs −55.0%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's operating margin is 17.3% in the Jun 26 quarter, −3.4 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0% to 21.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 17.3%, −3.4 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0%–21.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −3.4 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.1 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd earned ₹0.7 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −91.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹13.0 Cr. The 6-year compound rate is 8.4%. That is 0.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.8 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹0.7 Cr, −91.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹13.0 Cr (−55.2%), and the 6-year compound rate is 8.4%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −8.6% and the margin −3.4 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −73.4% vs revenue −5.4%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 259% of Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹70.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹13.0 Cr of profit. After ₹215 Cr of capital spending, ₹−145 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹70.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹13.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−145 Cr after ₹215 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 259% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 259%: the cash cycle tightened 34 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.9× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 190 days in FY26, down from 224 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹389 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹419 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.1 Cr, so roughly ₹218 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 9 days, inventory at 279 days — roughly 9.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 190 days, tighter than FY21's 224.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 279 days to sell; customers pay about 9 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 99 days — netting out to the 190-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹419 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.1 Cr — so the 190-day loop keeps roughly ₹218 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹389 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹134 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹24.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −9.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 3.1% net margin on 0.47× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 6%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 3.1% net margin × 0.47× asset turns × 1.91× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 2.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 2.6% − 12.0% = a −9.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd carries total debt of ₹309 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹472 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.65. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.67 in FY23 to 0.65 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹309 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹472 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.65. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.67 (FY23) to 0.65 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions cut 12.0 points of Stanley Lifestyles Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 10.3% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.7 points over the same window, to 0.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −12.0 points over 8 quarters to 10.3%; Foreign institutions: −1.7 points over 8 quarters to 0.9%; Promoters: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 56.9%.
🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−12.0 points), alongside foreign institutions (−1.7 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Gulshan Polyols LtdGULPOLY | 70.7/100Favorable setup87% evidence | ASLEEP | 27.5/35 Revenue 9.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 7 pp 95% evidence | 19.2/25 ROCE 18.6% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 13.2/20 P/E 7.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench 7% · 1Y 8.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.5 + 19.2 + 13.2 + 10.8 = 70.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Sagility LtdSAGILITY | 67.6/100Favorable setup87% evidence | TURNING | 24.7/35 Revenue 29.4% · PAT 49.3% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 13.4% · OPM 22% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 1.08 65% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 7.2% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y 5.3%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 15.8 + 13.5 + 13.6 = 67.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3IIRM Holdings India Ltd526530 | 64.2/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 16.3/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT 12.7% · OPM change 1.1 pp 95% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 20.4% · OPM 24.6% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 39.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.0/20 RS sector 42.8% · RS bench 47.3% · 1Y 79.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 19 + 9.9 + 19 = 64.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 47.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 4Exhicon Events Media Solutions Ltd543895 | 63.7/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | TURNING | 19.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0 pp 48% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 29.5% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 13.4/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.2/20 RS sector 2.2% · RS bench -1.9% · 1Y -4.8%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 20.1 + 13.4 + 11.2 = 63.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Aeroflex Enterprises LtdAEROENTER | 62.8/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | LEADER | 19.7/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 10.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 38.8% · RS bench 42.9% · 1Y 57.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 14.9 + 9 + 19.2 = 62.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Global Education LtdGLOBAL | 62.5/100Mixed-positive evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 14.2/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 3.3% · OPM change 0.3 pp 95% evidence | 19.8/25 ROCE 29.2% · OPM 41% 95% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 24.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 32.4% · RS bench 36.9% · 1Y 97.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 19.8 + 10.1 + 18.4 = 62.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 36.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Take Solutions LtdTAKE | 58.7/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence | 24.7/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change 2932.2 pp 57% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM — 80% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 3222× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 71.1% · RS bench 71.4% · 1Y 300.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-05-03 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 8.5 + 8.5 + 17 = 58.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8R K Swamy LtdRKSWAMY | 57.1/100Mixed-positive evidence65% evidence | 22.5/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change 2.6 pp 95% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 12.3% · OPM 10.4% 95% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench -16.7% · 1Y —4 of 5 weeks ahead to 2026-08-16 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 15.6 + 10.7 + 8.3 = 57.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Aegis Vopak Terminals LtdAEGISVOPAK | 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.9/35 Revenue 25.9% · PAT 40.9% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 77% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 121× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector — · RS bench 25.5% · 1Y 24.5%10 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 13.2 + 8.9 + 11.8 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Parin Enterprises LtdPARIN | 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence63% evidence | FADING | 19.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -3 pp 48% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 9% 95% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 117× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 46.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 11.6 + 9.1 + 12.1 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Eveready Industries India LtdEVEREADY | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence94% evidence | TURNING | 18.9/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 17.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 2.1 100% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench 8.6% · 1Y -22.3%6 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 13.6 + 9 + 9.4 = 50.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12GMR Airports LtdGMRAIRPORT | 50.8/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.7/35 Revenue 38.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 74% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 37% 100% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 184× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 14%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.7 + 11.3 + 8.7 + 8.1 = 50.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Anzen India Energy Yield Plus TrustANZEN | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence60% evidence | TURNING | 20.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9 pp 95% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 80% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 99.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 8.7%1 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 11.2 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Jai Corp LtdJAICORPLTD | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | BASING | 19.6/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT -40.4% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 15% 95% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -40.2%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 11.4 + 10.9 + 6.4 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Inox Green Energy Services LtdINOXGREEN | 48.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.2/35 Revenue 16.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -13.2 pp 95% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 58.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -6% · RS bench -2.9% · 1Y 19.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 9.1 + 9.7 + 7 = 48 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16TCC Concept LtdTCC | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 16.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 51.1% · OPM change -45 pp 95% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 36% 95% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 20× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -31.9% · 1Y -89.7%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 11.8 + 14.1 + 5 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Prozone Realty LtdPROZONER | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 17.0/35 Revenue -9.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.2 pp 95% evidence | 6.4/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -35.6% 95% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 62.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench 3.1% · 1Y 21.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 6.4 + 9.6 + 13.4 = 46.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Aqylon Nexus LtdAQYLON | 45.9/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | BASING | 18.5/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2358 pp 71% evidence | 18.8/25 ROCE 131% · OPM 58% 95% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 759× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -76.3% · RS bench -75.3% · 1Y -79.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.5 + 18.8 + 8.6 + 0 = 45.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Jindal Photo LtdJINDALPHOT | 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 15 pp 95% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM 98% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -19.1% · RS bench -16.2% · 1Y -14.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 10.1 + 10 + 2.8 = 43.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Shipping Corporation of India Land & Assets LtdSCILAL | 42.8/100Mixed-negative evidence80% evidence | BASING | 24.2/35 Revenue 23.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 95% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM -14% 95% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 62.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -26.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 5 + 9.5 + 4.1 = 42.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -17.6% and the one-year return is -26.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 21TruAlt Bioenergy LtdTRUALT | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence63% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.7/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT -8.1% · OPM change 7 pp 100% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 10.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -21.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 9.3 + 10.3 + 10 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22GKW LtdGKWLIMITED | 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.9/35 Revenue -13.5% · PAT 0% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 84% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench -4.5% · 1Y -9.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.9 + 9.2 + 10 + 9.1 = 39.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Unitech LtdUNITECH | 36.8/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence | BASING | 18.0/35 Revenue 45.3% · PAT -10% · OPM change 15 pp 71% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 6% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -22.3% · RS bench -19.7% · 1Y -39.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 3.5 + 10 + 5.3 = 36.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Kaveri Seed Company LtdKSCL | 35.9/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BASING | 11.3/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -21.7% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 18.8% · OPM 40% 100% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 14.8× · PEG 3.12 100% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench -19.8% · 1Y -40%1 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 14.4 + 4.7 + 5.5 = 35.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Delta Corp LtdDELTACORP | 35.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 9.7/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 18% 95% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -18.1% · RS bench -18.3% · 1Y -36.2%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.7 + 8.6 + 12 + 5.1 = 35.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Stanley Lifestyles Ltdthis pageSTANLEY | 30.0/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | BASING | 6.6/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -3.4 pp 95% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 17.3% 95% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 112× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -43.7% · RS bench -25.2% · 1Y -54.7%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.6 + 10.8 + 9.2 + 3.4 = 30 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Embassy Developments LtdEMBDL | 26.2/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | BASING | 5.9/35 Revenue -46.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -58.4 pp 71% evidence | 3.4/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -60% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y -42.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.9 + 3.4 + 10 + 6.9 = 26.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28RattanIndia Enterprises LtdRTNINDIA | 17.5/100Adverse evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 2.7/35 Revenue 2.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change -23.9 pp 100% evidence | 1.0/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM 2.1% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -32.1% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y -55.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 2.7 + 1 + 10 + 3.8 = 17.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Central Mine Planning & Design Institute LtdCMPDI | 63.2/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8 pp 34% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 38.1% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 23.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —4 of 9 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 20.6 + 10.2 + 10 = 63.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30FlySBS Aviation LtdFLYSBS | 57.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -8 pp 26% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 32.5% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 20× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector — · RS bench 43.9% · 1Y 14.1%6 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 19.4 + 10.6 + 12.3 = 57.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 31Qualitek Labs Ltd544091 | 54.3/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3 pp 7% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 44.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector — · RS bench 42.7% · 1Y —4 of 6 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 15.1 + 9.8 + 12.1 = 54.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 32Shree Vasu Logistics LtdSVLL | 52.6/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 26% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 12.9% · OPM 25.8% 95% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 126× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -16.1% · RS bench 17.5% · 1Y 2.2%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 16 + 8.8 + 9.5 = 52.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 33Indiqube Spaces LtdINDIQUBE | 49.7/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.9/35 Revenue 38.9% · PAT 30.4% · OPM change 0 pp 71% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 61% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector — · RS bench 10.4% · 1Y -11.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 25% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.3 + 10 + 11.5 = 49.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 34Maagh Advertising & Marketing Services Ltd543624 | 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 275.6 pp 32% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench 37% · 1Y —7 of 9 weeks ahead to 2025-03-19 25% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.1 + 10 + 12 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 35Tandhan Industries Ltd512062 | 46.3/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT 100% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM 15.8% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —10 of 10 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 6.7 + 9.4 + 10 = 46.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 36Shree Rama Newsprint LtdRAMANEWS | 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence | 14.1/35 Revenue -20% · PAT 69.8% · OPM change -8 pp 40% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 8% 71% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 21.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-04-19 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 6.1 + 10 + 15.2 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's share price today?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd trades at ₹136, −55.0% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹775 Cr. The stock sits at 3% of its 52-week range of ₹131–₹301, −23.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 97 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd reported revenue of ₹99.3 Cr and net profit of ₹0.7 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue fell 8.6% and profit fell 91.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹0.08. The operating margin was 17.3%, 3.4 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's revenue?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd reported revenue of ₹99.3 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −8.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹419 Cr (−1.6%). Over the last 6 years revenue compounded at 12.6% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's profit?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd earned ₹0.7 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −91.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹13.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 17.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's market cap?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹775 Cr at a share price of ₹136. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's P/E ratio?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd trades at a P/E of 112.0×, at the 97th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 58.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Stanley Lifestyles Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 3 of its last 7 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Stanley Lifestyles Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 112.0× sits at the 97th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 58.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd growing?
Not right now — Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −8.6% year on year, profit −91.6%, and the margin −3.4 pp at 17.3%. The 6-year compound rates are 12.6% (revenue) and 8.4% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 11 September 2026.
How is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd performing?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd is in a downtrend, 97 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 8.6% and profit fell 91.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 5 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd in?
Deteriorating — revenue and profit growth are shrinking (revenue growth −8.6% latest (single-quarter readings) against +23.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 6.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −8.6% latest, profit growth −91.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 97 of stage 4), trading −23.4% versus its 200-day average and at 3% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Stanley Lifestyles Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-07), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 2.2 years the stock moved −71% against the NIFTY 500's +0% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Stanley Lifestyles Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹136, the price is in a downtrend 97 weeks in. Its P/E of 112.0× sits at the 97th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns Stanley Lifestyles Ltd?
Promoters hold 56.9% of Stanley Lifestyles Ltd, foreign institutions 0.9%, domestic institutions 10.3% and the public 31.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 12.0 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Stanley Lifestyles Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.66, and operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹309 Cr against equity of ₹466 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's capex?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd spent ₹389 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹215 Cr, with ₹24.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's cash flow?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd generated ₹70.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−145 Cr of free cash flow after ₹215 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹13.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 259% of Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹70.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹13.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd in its business cycle?
Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 18.0%, against a 7-year band of 7.0%–21.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 17.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What growth does Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's price assume?
At its price on 13 June 2026, Stanley Lifestyles Ltd was priced for profit growth of about 33.5% a year. Profit itself has compounded 8.4% a year over the past 6 years. The figure reads the multiple backwards: the growth a buyer at that price was already paying for. — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the Stanley Lifestyles Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Stanley Lifestyles Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Stanley Lifestyles Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!