Anthem Biosciences Ltd
ANTHEMAnthem Biosciences Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 12 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (12 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 56th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −11.8% year on year, and 89% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd trades at ₹809, in a confirmed uptrend and 12 weeks into that stage. That is +10.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 86% of a 52-week range of ₹588 to ₹846. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 12 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹809 it trades +10.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 86% of its 52-week range (₹588–₹846).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.0 years the stock moved +7% while the NIFTY 500 moved +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd trades at 76.8× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 74.8×, measured across 1.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 76.8× is mid-range by its own standards (56th percentile), against a long-run median of 74.8× measured over 1.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +30.6% against a +9.6% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Anthem Biosciences Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +15.1% | +26.2% | +14.0% | — |
| Profit | +31.3% | +15.4% | +16.9% | — |
| EPS | +30.6% | +16.0% | −49.5% | — |
| Share price | +9.6% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
52.3/100 — rank 11 of 24 in Pharma - API & CRAMS · 77% evidence confidence
Anthem Biosciences Ltd scores 52.3 out of 100 against the 24 companies it is compared with in Pharma - API & CRAMS, ranking 11. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 13.1 + 20.6 + 9.1 + 9.5 = 52.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd reported ₹418 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −22.6% year on year. Over 6 years it has compounded at 22.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,124 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,002 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,124 Cr (+15.1% on the year), capping 6 years at 22.4% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹418 Cr, −22.6% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −1.6% growth against the decade's 22.4% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd's operating margin is 36.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 29.0% to 46.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 36.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 29.0%–46.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +7.8 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd earned ₹120 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −11.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹592 Cr. The 6-year compound rate is 36.1%. That is 28.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹136 Cr.
Jun 26 profit was ₹120 Cr, −11.8% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹592 Cr (+31.3%), and the 6-year compound rate is 36.1%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −22.6% and the margin +1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +24.7% vs revenue −1.6%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 89% of Anthem Biosciences Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹844 Cr of operating cash against ₹592 Cr of profit. After ₹179 Cr of capital spending, ₹665 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹844 Cr against reported profit of ₹592 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹665 Cr after ₹179 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 89% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 89%: the cash cycle stretched 61 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.4× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Anthem Biosciences Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 124 days in FY26, up from 63 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹739 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,124 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹5.8 Cr, so roughly ₹722 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 101 days, inventory at 56 days — roughly 1.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 124 days, looser than FY21's 63.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 56 days to sell; customers pay about 101 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 34 days — netting out to the 124-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,124 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹5.8 Cr — so the 124-day loop keeps roughly ₹722 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹739 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹305 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹264 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd earns a ROCE of 30% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 24% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +10.6 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 27.9% net margin on 0.62× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 30%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 24% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 27.9% net margin × 0.62× asset turns × 1.13× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.5% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 22.6% − 12.0% = a +10.6 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every rupee reinvested creates more than a rupee of value — the engine compounds.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd carries total debt of ₹54.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,043 Cr as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.02 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.12 in FY24 to 0.02 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Jun 26: total debt of ₹54.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,043 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.02. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.12 (FY24) to 0.02 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of Anthem Biosciences Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — .
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Anthem Biosciences Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Neuland Laboratories LtdNEULANDLAB | 76.7/100Favorable setup96% evidence | LEADER | 30.2/35 Revenue 37% · PAT 39.9% · OPM change 24 pp 88% evidence | 21.3/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 40% 100% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 67.7× · PEG 1.05 100% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 6.3% · RS bench 21.5% · 1Y 38.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.2 + 21.3 + 11.6 + 13.6 = 76.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Laurus Labs LtdLAURUSLABS | 74.3/100Favorable setup93% evidence | LEADER | 32.3/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 17.8% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 5.0/20 P/E 89.8× · PEG 3.33 65% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 41.7% · RS bench 61.8% · 1Y 116.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 32.3 + 17 + 5 + 20 = 74.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3Gland Pharma LtdGLAND | 73.8/100Favorable setup96% evidence | LEADER | 26.0/35 Revenue 14.5% · PAT 46.7% · OPM change 5 pp 88% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 13.5/20 P/E 39.6× · PEG 1.45 100% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 27.7% · 1Y 24%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26 + 17.6 + 13.5 + 16.7 = 73.8 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 4Acutaas Chemicals Ltd543349 | 72.1/100Favorable setup82% evidence | LEADER | 31.8/35 Revenue 33% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 31.6% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 65.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 23.8% · RS bench 41% · 1Y 168%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.8 + 19.9 + 7.3 + 13.1 = 72.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 5IOL Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdIOLCP | 69.2/100Favorable setup96% evidence | LEADER | 24.4/35 Revenue 11.5% · PAT 36.6% · OPM change 3 pp 88% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 11.2% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG 0.66 100% evidence | 18.6/20 RS sector 28.8% · RS bench 45.7% · 1Y 55.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 12.9 + 13.3 + 18.6 = 69.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Shilpa Medicare LtdSHILPAMED | 65.4/100Favorable setup93% evidence | LEADER | 27.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 11% · OPM 27% 95% evidence | 6.0/20 P/E 51.2× · PEG 6.86 100% evidence | 19.3/20 RS sector 29.8% · RS bench 47.1% · 1Y 34.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.2 + 12.9 + 6 + 19.3 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Granules India LtdGRANULES | 64.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 27.3/35 Revenue 24.8% · PAT 38.1% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 14.5/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 31.4× · PEG 1.27 100% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 13.2% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 75.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.3 + 14.5 + 9.8 + 13 = 64.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Supriya Lifescience LtdSUPRIYA | 63.8/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | LEADER | 16.2/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 11.2% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 25.1% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 15.5/20 P/E 33.3× · PEG 0.55 100% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector 1.3% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 26.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 19.5 + 15.5 + 12.6 = 63.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Divis Laboratories LtdDIVISLAB | 63.6/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.9/35 Revenue 16.4% · PAT 26.8% · OPM change 11 pp 100% evidence | 18.5/25 ROCE 22% · OPM 41% 100% evidence | 4.5/20 P/E 71.8× · PEG 3.45 100% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 7.4% · RS bench 23.4% · 1Y 21.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.9 + 18.5 + 4.5 + 15.7 = 63.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 10Sai Life Sciences LtdSAILIFE | 63.4/100Mixed-positive evidence89% evidence | LEADER | 27.4/35 Revenue 29.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2 pp 88% evidence | 17.3/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 78.7× · PEG 3.46 65% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 14.7% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 56.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.4 + 17.3 + 4.7 + 14 = 63.4 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 11Anthem Biosciences Ltdthis pageANTHEM | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence | FADING | 13.1/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT 14.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 20.6/25 ROCE 30.4% · OPM 36% 100% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 76.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -4.3% · RS bench 9.7% · 1Y 6.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 20.6 + 9.1 + 9.5 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Windlas Biotech LtdWINDLAS | 51.9/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.1/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 9.8% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 11% 95% evidence | 11.7/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y -13%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 14.1 + 11.7 + 9 = 51.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Blue Jet Healthcare LtdBLUEJET | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 6.5/35 Revenue -8% · PAT -19% · OPM change -11 pp 88% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 30% 100% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 47.8× · PEG 1.39 100% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -39.2% · RS bench 15.6% · 1Y -20.7%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.5 + 19.6 + 13.6 + 6.7 = 46.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 14SMS Pharmaceuticals LtdSMSPHARMA | 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.4/35 Revenue 10.2% · PAT 41.7% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 34.2× · PEG 1.53 100% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 57.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.4 + 10.7 + 9.4 + 5.8 = 46.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Dishman Carbogen Amcis LtdDCAL | 37.7/100Mixed-negative evidence83% evidence | TURNING | 17.8/35 Revenue 8.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 19% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 29.6× · PEG 2.65 65% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -31% · RS bench -15.4% · 1Y -25.2%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 7.3 + 8.5 + 4.1 = 37.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Concord Biotech LtdCONCORDBIO | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | TURNING | 9.4/35 Revenue -6.7% · PAT -23.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 53.5× · PEG 5.67 100% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -23.6% · RS bench 4.9% · 1Y -24.5%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.4 + 14.8 + 6.4 + 6.9 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Jubilant Pharmova LtdJUBLPHARMA | 37.4/100Mixed-negative evidence89% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.7/35 Revenue 14.4% · PAT -52.5% · OPM change -3 pp 88% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 9% · OPM 15% 100% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 34.1× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -8.1% · 1Y -20.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.7 + 8.8 + 13.6 + 3.3 = 37.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 18Morepen Laboratories LtdMOREPENLAB | 33.1/100Adverse evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 8.5/35 Revenue -0.3% · PAT -18.6% · OPM change -4 pp 88% evidence | 5.9/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 5% 100% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 42× · PEG 1.68 100% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench 24.4% · 1Y -4.6%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.5 + 5.9 + 9.9 + 8.8 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Piramal Pharma LtdPPLPHARMA | 33.0/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 13.1/35 Revenue 0.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 74% evidence | 1.3/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench 10.4% · 1Y -3.3%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 1.3 + 10 + 8.6 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20OneSource Specialty Pharma LtdONESOURCE | 28.3/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.7/35 Revenue 4.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 0 pp 74% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -4% · 1Y -17.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.7 + 3 + 10 + 3.6 = 28.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Solara Active Pharma Sciences LtdSOLARA | 26.7/100Adverse evidence77% evidence | TURNING | 8.6/35 Revenue 15.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 575× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y -26.3%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.6 + 3.5 + 8.5 + 6.1 = 26.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Syngene International LtdSYNGENE | 26.3/100Adverse evidence94% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.6/35 Revenue -3.4% · PAT -56.4% · OPM change -11.3 pp 100% evidence | 7.6/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 12.3% 100% evidence | 7.8/20 P/E 52.6× · PEG 7.87 100% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -22.2% · RS bench -28.5% · 1Y -43.3%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.6 + 7.6 + 7.8 + 4.3 = 26.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Cohance Lifesciences LtdCOHANCE | 25.9/100Adverse evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.1/35 Revenue -13% · PAT -69% · OPM change -11.3 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 8.3% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -54.6% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -58.3%9 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.1 + 9.8 + 6.9 + 3.1 = 25.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Hikal LtdHIKAL | 24.3/100Adverse evidence80% evidence | TURNING | 5.0/35 Revenue -8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2 pp 88% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 75.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -36% · RS bench 0% · 1Y -33.3%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5 + 7.8 + 6.1 + 5.4 = 24.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's share price today?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd trades at ₹809, +9.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹45,574 Cr. The stock sits at 86% of its 52-week range of ₹588–₹846, +10.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 12 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were Anthem Biosciences Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd reported revenue of ₹418 Cr and net profit of ₹120 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue fell 22.6% and profit fell 11.8% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.13. The operating margin was 36.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's revenue?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd reported revenue of ₹418 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −22.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,124 Cr (+15.1%). Over the last 6 years revenue compounded at 22.4% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's profit?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd earned ₹120 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −11.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹592 Cr. The operating margin ran 36.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's market cap?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹45,574 Cr at a share price of ₹809. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's P/E ratio?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd trades at a P/E of 76.8×, at the 56th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 74.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Anthem Biosciences Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — Anthem Biosciences Ltd's dividend payout was 19% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 1 of its last 7 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Anthem Biosciences Ltd looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 76.8× sits at the 56th percentile of its 1-year range (long-run median 74.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd growing?
Not right now — Anthem Biosciences Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −22.6% year on year, profit −11.8%, and the margin +1.0 pp at 36.0%. The 6-year compound rates are 22.4% (revenue) and 36.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 31 July 2026.
How is Anthem Biosciences Ltd performing?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 12 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 22.6% and profit fell 11.8% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 12 of stage 2), trading +10.4% versus its 200-day average and at 86% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Anthem Biosciences Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.0 years the stock moved +7% against the NIFTY 500's +2% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will Anthem Biosciences Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Anthem Biosciences Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹809, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 12 weeks in. Its P/E of 76.8× sits at the 56th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns Anthem Biosciences Ltd?
Promoters hold 71.4% of Anthem Biosciences Ltd, foreign institutions 2.6%, domestic institutions 13.5% and the public 12.5% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does Anthem Biosciences Ltd have too much debt?
No — Anthem Biosciences Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.02, and operating profit covers the interest bill north of 100×. FY26 borrowings were ₹54.0 Cr against equity of ₹3,042 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's capex?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd spent ₹739 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹179 Cr, with ₹264 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's cash flow?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd generated ₹844 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹665 Cr of free cash flow after ₹179 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹592 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 89% of Anthem Biosciences Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹844 Cr against reported profit of ₹592 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is Anthem Biosciences Ltd in its business cycle?
Anthem Biosciences Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 39.0%, against a 7-year band of 29.0%–46.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 36.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the Anthem Biosciences Ltd story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 12 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is Anthem Biosciences Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Anthem Biosciences Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.