Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-11
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd

COHANCE
Pharma - API & CRAMS

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +7.4 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.

The price is in a downtrend (64 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 98th percentile of its own 6-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −197.8% year on year, and 150% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.

Stage
Deteriorating
partial read
Price
₹440
−55.1% 1Y
P/E
156.0×
98th pctile
of its own 6-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹422 Cr
−23.1% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹−45.0 Cr
−197.8% YoY
Operating margin
0.3%
−19.7 pp YoY
ROCE
6%
FY26
Cash conversion
150%
of profit, last 3 FY
Withheld from this page: Part of this page is deliberately not drawn: its two data sources disagree by up to 138% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so nothing from the second source is placed here — the PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, the quarterly return curves, the annual return-on-invested-capital overlay, the total-debt and debt-to-equity series and the F-score and the return-on-invested-capital reading are absent for that reason. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data. The quarterly history also begins where the primary source begins: 6 earlier quarters the second source carries are not spliced in front of it. Extending a reported profit series is stricter than showing a ratio chart — it needs a source that has been checked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd trades at ₹440, in a downtrend and 64 weeks into that stage. That is −11.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 27% of a 52-week range of ₹280 to ₹876. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 64 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹440 it trades −11.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 27% of its 52-week range (₹280–₹876).

Sep 26: ₹440 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−11.2% versus the 200-day line, week 64 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4₹1,411₹1,107₹804₹500₹196₹440₹496Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Jan 26Sep 26
S2S4₹1,411₹1,107₹804₹500₹196₹440₹496Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2020 Each cell is one week from 2020 to now (345 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 20Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 6.5 years the stock moved +202% while the NIFTY 500 moved +226% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd trades at 156.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 35.6×, measured across 6.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 156.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 35.6× measured over 6.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 156.0× vs a 35.6× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 6.2-year window; loss-period spikes above 107× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
about the priciest it has ever traded
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
114.1×₹21.287.7×₹15.961.4×₹10.635.1×₹5.38.7×₹0.0×106.80×₹3Jun 20Apr 22Oct 23Apr 25Sep 26
114.1×₹21.287.7×₹15.961.4×₹10.635.1×₹5.38.7×₹0.0×106.80×₹3Jun 20Oct 23Sep 26
P/E
156.0×
98th percentile of 6y

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −75.5% against a −55.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −3.8%/yr price move, ~−28.2%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+24.4 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 138% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −19.7% latest against +147.9% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 6.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −13.0% in FY26, profit −69.0% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
162%212%112%135%63%58%14%−20%−35%−97%%%−13%−69%FY19FY22FY26
162%212%112%135%63%58%14%−20%−35%−97%%%−13%−69%FY19FY22FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
161%91%113%43%64%−4.6%15%−53%−33%−100%%%−19.7%−87.2%−84.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
161%91%113%43%64%−4.6%15%−53%−33%−100%%%−19.7%−87.2%−84.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
34%27%19%11%3.9%%6%FY23FY24FY26
34%27%19%11%3.9%%6%FY23FY24FY26
Revenue growth
Falling
latest −19.7% · span −19.7% to +147.9%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −87.2% · span −87.2% to +78.0%
EPS growth
Falling
latest −84.1% · span −84.1% to +74.1%
ROCE
Falling
latest 6.0% · span 6.0%–32.0%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−13.0%+19.2%+17.6%
Profit−69.0%−28.5%−16.2%
EPS−75.5%−33.8%−19.9%
Share price−55.1%−5.3%−3.8%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
−23.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
−197.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
29.2%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

20.6/100 — rank 24 of 24 in Pharma - API & CRAMS · 82% evidence confidence

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd scores 20.6 out of 100 against the 24 companies it is compared with in Pharma - API & CRAMS, ranking 24. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 3 + 6.8 + 5.5 + 5.3 = 20.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd reported ₹422 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, −23.1% year on year. Over 7 years it has compounded at 29.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,269 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,142 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹2,269 Cr (−13.0% on the year), capping 7 years at 29.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹422 Cr, −23.1% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹2,269 Cr (−13.0% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
29.2% a year over 7 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.8k162%2.1k112%1.4k63%70414%0−35%₹ Cr%₹2,269−13%FY19FY22FY26
2.8k162%2.1k112%1.4k63%70414%0−35%₹ Cr%₹2,269−13%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹422 Cr (−23.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
907254%680175%45497%22719%0−59%₹ Cr%₹422−23.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
907254%680175%45497%22719%0−59%₹ Cr%₹422−23.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −19.2% growth against the decade's 29.2% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −19.7% over the last 4 quarters against +34.1%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −87.2% vs −52.3%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's operating margin is 0.3% in the Jun 26 quarter, −19.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 19.0% to 46.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 0.3%, −19.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 19.0%–46.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −20.1 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.5 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 19.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 8-year window.
within a 19.0–46.0% band over 8 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
48%2.0%40%−1.7%33%−5.5%25%−9.3%17%−13%%%19%−12%FY19FY22FY26
48%2.0%40%−1.7%33%−5.5%25%−9.3%17%−13%%%19%−12%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: 0.3% operating margin (−19.7 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
45%7.2%33%−0.7%21%−8.5%9.1%−16%−3.0%−24%%%0.3%−19.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
45%7.2%33%−0.7%21%−8.5%9.1%−16%−3.0%−24%%%0.3%−19.7%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd posted a net loss of ₹45.0 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹150 Cr. The 7-year compound rate is 4.7%. That loss is 10.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹46.0 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was ₹−45.0 Cr, −197.8% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹150 Cr (−69.0%), and the 7-year compound rate is 4.7%.

FY26 profit ₹150 Cr (−69.0% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
4.7% a year over 7 years
Net profitYoY growth
523212%392136%26161%131−14%0−90%₹ Cr%₹150−69%FY19FY22FY26
523212%392136%26161%131−14%0−90%₹ Cr%₹150−69%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹−45.0 Cr (−197.8% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
169259%111137%5414%−3−109%−61−232%₹ Cr%₹−45−197.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
169259%111137%5414%−3−109%−61−232%₹ Cr%₹−45−197.8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −23.1% and the margin −19.7 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −106.0% vs revenue −19.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 150% of Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹368 Cr of operating cash against ₹150 Cr of profit. After ₹293 Cr of capital spending, ₹75.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹368 Cr against reported profit of ₹150 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹75.0 Cr after ₹293 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 150% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹368 Cr vs profit ₹150 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 8-year window, annual resolution. FY25 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
150% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
7275453631820₹ Cr₹368₹150₹75FY19FY22FY26
7275453631820₹ Cr₹368₹150₹75FY19FY22FY26
FY26: CFO = 245% of profit (three-year rate 150%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
261%203%146%88%30%%245%FY19FY22FY26
261%203%146%88%30%%245%FY19FY22FY26

Why conversion sits at 150%: the cash cycle stretched 83 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 7.6× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 263 days in FY26, up from 180 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹3,128 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹2,269 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹6.2 Cr, so roughly ₹1,635 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 110 days, inventory at 310 days — roughly 10.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 263 days, looser than FY21's 180.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 310 days to sell; customers pay about 110 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 157 days — netting out to the 263-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹2,269 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹6.2 Cr — so the 263-day loop keeps roughly ₹1,635 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 263-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 8-year window.
+83 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
598446293140−12days263d310d110d157dFY19FY20FY22FY24FY26
598446293140−12days263d310d110d157dFY19FY22FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹3,128 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹409 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹178 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹293 Cr, work-in-progress ₹178 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
3.0k2.2k1.5k7450₹ Cr₹293₹178FY20FY21FY23FY24FY26
3.0k2.2k1.5k7450₹ Cr₹293₹178FY20FY23FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd earns a ROCE of 6% in FY26. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 6.6% net margin on 0.40× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 6%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 6.6% net margin × 0.40× asset turns × 1.46× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 3.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

FY26: ROCE 6% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 7-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEWACC
54%41%28%15%2.5%%6%FY20FY21FY23FY24FY26
54%41%28%15%2.5%%6%FY20FY23FY26

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 138% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd carries ₹400 Cr of borrowings against ₹3,911 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.10. Operating profit covers the interest bill 12×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹143 Cr to ₹400 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹3,128 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹400 Cr against equity of ₹3,911 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.10. Operating profit covers the interest bill 12×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹143 Cr to ₹400 Cr while capital spending ran ₹3,128 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

FY26: borrowings ₹400 Cr at 0.10× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 8-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
the debt trajectory
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
5250.24×3940.18×2620.13×1310.07×00.01×₹ Cr×₹4000.10×FY19FY20FY22FY24FY26
5250.24×3940.18×2620.13×1310.07×00.01×₹ Cr×₹4000.10×FY19FY22FY26

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 138% on reported income across 14 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters added 7.4 points of Cohance Lifesciences Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 57.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −3.3 points over the same window, to 6.5%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +7.4 points over 8 quarters to 57.5%; Foreign institutions: −3.3 points over 8 quarters to 6.5%; Domestic institutions: +2.7 points over 8 quarters to 20.1%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −3.3 points against domestic institutions +2.7 points over 8 quarters, with promoters +7.4 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +7.4 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
62%47%32%16%1.4%%57.5%5.6%21.8%15.1%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
62%47%32%16%1.4%%57.5%5.6%21.8%15.1%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Promoters added 7.4 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
71%54%36%18%0.7%%57.5%6.5%20.1%15.9%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
71%54%36%18%0.7%%57.5%6.5%20.1%15.9%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Pharma - API & CRAMS
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Neuland Laboratories LtdNEULANDLAB 81.2/100Sector-leading setup100% evidence LEADER 33.6/35 Revenue 78.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 100% evidence 19.9/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 35% 100% evidence 12.0/20 P/E 60.7× · PEG 1.05 100% evidence 15.7/20 RS sector 7.5% · RS bench 44.6% · 1Y 62.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 33.6 + 19.9 + 12 + 15.7 = 81.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Acutaas Chemicals LtdACUTAAS 77.3/100Favorable setup76% evidence 31.9/35 Revenue 41% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence 20.1/25 ROCE 31.6% · OPM 34% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 71.7× · PEG — 50% evidence 16.0/20 RS sector 86.5% · RS bench 43.7% · 1Y 129.5%5 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 31.9 + 20.1 + 9.3 + 16 = 77.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3IOL Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdIOLCP 73.0/100Favorable setup100% evidence LEADER 28.5/35 Revenue 18.5% · PAT 60% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 14% 100% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG 0.66 100% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 37.2% · RS bench 81.2% · 1Y 100.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.5 + 12.5 + 13.8 + 18.2 = 73 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Laurus Labs LtdLAURUSLABS 71.2/100Favorable setup93% evidence LEADER 32.2/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence 18.2/25 ROCE 17.8% · OPM 32% 100% evidence 5.3/20 P/E 97.3× · PEG 3.33 65% evidence 15.5/20 RS sector 22.2% · RS bench 63.4% · 1Y 123.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 32.2 + 18.2 + 5.3 + 15.5 = 71.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
5Gland Pharma LtdGLAND 69.7/100Favorable setup100% evidence LEADER 26.4/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 46.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 42.1× · PEG 1.45 100% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench 45.5% · 1Y 54.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.4 + 13.9 + 14.2 + 15.2 = 69.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Divis Laboratories LtdDIVISLAB 65.4/100Favorable setup100% evidence LEADER 26.5/35 Revenue 16.4% · PAT 26.8% · OPM change 11 pp 100% evidence 19.1/25 ROCE 22% · OPM 41% 100% evidence 3.5/20 P/E 83.1× · PEG 3.45 100% evidence 16.3/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 39.9% · 1Y 55.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.5 + 19.1 + 3.5 + 16.3 = 65.4 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
7Shilpa Medicare LtdSHILPAMED 63.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 27.6/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 29% 100% evidence 5.6/20 P/E 66.1× · PEG 6.86 100% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 60.8% · RS bench 111.5% · 1Y 127.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.6 + 10.3 + 5.6 + 19.6 = 63.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Sai Life Sciences LtdSAILIFE 62.9/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence LEADER 27.2/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 4.9/20 P/E 91.6× · PEG 3.46 65% evidence 14.2/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 51.7% · 1Y 84.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.2 + 16.6 + 4.9 + 14.2 = 62.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
9Granules India LtdGRANULES 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 26.4/35 Revenue 24.8% · PAT 38.1% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 23% 100% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 34.7× · PEG 1.27 100% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 37.1% · 1Y 77.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.4 + 15.8 + 10.4 + 9.8 = 62.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Windlas Biotech LtdWINDLAS 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.7/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 9.8% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence 14.5/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 11% 95% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 35.1× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.8/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 34.7% · 1Y 13.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.7 + 14.5 + 11.5 + 10.8 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11Anthem Biosciences LtdANTHEM 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.7/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT 14.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 22.0/25 ROCE 30.4% · OPM 36% 100% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 89.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.1/20 RS sector -4.6% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 13.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.7 + 22 + 9.2 + 9.1 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12SMS Pharmaceuticals LtdSMSPHARMA 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence TURNING 19.1/35 Revenue 10.2% · PAT 41.7% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 20% 100% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 42.4× · PEG 1.53 100% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 96.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 11.3 + 10.3 + 8 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Morepen Laboratories LtdMOREPENLAB 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.3/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 51.6% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 14% 100% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 54× · PEG 1.68 100% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench 130.1% · 1Y 134.8%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 8.5 + 9.7 + 10 = 48.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Blue Jet Healthcare LtdBLUEJET 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence BREAKING OUT 5.8/35 Revenue -27.5% · PAT -34.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence 21.0/25 ROCE 26.1% · OPM 33% 100% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 45.8× · PEG 1.39 100% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -39.2% · RS bench 12% · 1Y -23.6%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 5.8 + 21 + 13.8 + 5.9 = 46.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
15Supriya Lifescience LtdSUPRIYA 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence FADING 16.1/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 11.2% · OPM change -11 pp 100% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 25.2% · OPM 25% 100% evidence 6.9/20 P/E 36.5× · PEG 3.11 100% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench 20.4% · 1Y 38.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 17.1 + 6.9 + 5.2 = 45.3 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
16Concord Biotech LtdCONCORDBIO 37.8/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence BREAKING OUT 9.2/35 Revenue -6.7% · PAT -23.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 32% 100% evidence 6.7/20 P/E 56.7× · PEG 5.67 100% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -23.6% · RS bench 16.4% · 1Y -9.2%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.2 + 14.9 + 6.7 + 7 = 37.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Jubilant Pharmova LtdJUBLPHARMA 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence TURNING 11.8/35 Revenue 16.3% · PAT -23% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 9% · OPM 11% 100% evidence 13.9/20 P/E 42.1× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y -4.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 6.8 + 13.9 + 5.1 = 37.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
18Piramal Pharma LtdPPLPHARMA 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence LEADER 13.0/35 Revenue 0.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 74% evidence 1.4/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 9% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.8/20 RS sector -10.9% · RS bench 21.1% · 1Y 5.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 1.4 + 10 + 10.8 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Solara Active Pharma Sciences LtdSOLARA 34.7/100Adverse evidence83% evidence TURNING 7.9/35 Revenue 15.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 843× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector 1.9% · RS bench 38.7% · 1Y 12.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 3.8 + 8.5 + 14.5 = 34.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 38.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
20Hikal LtdHIKAL 33.0/100Adverse evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 11.6/35 Revenue -5.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change 2.6 pp 74% evidence 4.3/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 9.2% 100% evidence 7.4/20 P/E 65.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 9.7/20 RS sector -21.7% · RS bench 6.9% · 1Y -14.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.6 + 4.3 + 7.4 + 9.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21OneSource Specialty Pharma LtdONESOURCE 27.5/100Adverse evidence71% evidence BASING 11.3/35 Revenue 4.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 0 pp 74% evidence 3.3/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 27% 100% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 2.9/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y -15%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.3 + 3.3 + 10 + 2.9 = 27.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Syngene International LtdSYNGENE 23.6/100Adverse evidence100% evidence BASING 6.7/35 Revenue -3.4% · PAT -56.4% · OPM change -11.3 pp 100% evidence 8.6/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 12.3% 100% evidence 8.1/20 P/E 52.2× · PEG 7.87 100% evidence 0.2/20 RS sector -44.2% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -41%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 6.7 + 8.6 + 8.1 + 0.2 = 23.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23Dishman Carbogen Amcis LtdDCAL 22.1/100Adverse evidence87% evidence ASLEEP 7.0/35 Revenue 0.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -11 pp 100% evidence 4.8/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 9% 100% evidence 6.4/20 P/E 145× · PEG 2.65 65% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -31% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -39.5%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7 + 4.8 + 6.4 + 3.9 = 22.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Cohance Lifesciences Ltdthis pageCOHANCE 20.6/100Adverse evidence82% evidence BREAKING OUT 3.0/35 Revenue -19.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -19.7 pp 95% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence 5.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 50% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -33.4% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y -52.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 3 + 6.8 + 5.5 + 5.3 = 20.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's share price today?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd trades at ₹440, −55.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹16,842 Cr. The stock sits at 27% of its 52-week range of ₹280–₹876, −11.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 64 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.

What were Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd reported revenue of ₹422 Cr and a net loss of ₹45.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue fell 23.1% and profit fell 197.8% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹−0.63. The operating margin was 0.3%, 19.7 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's revenue?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd reported revenue of ₹422 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, −23.1% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹2,269 Cr (−13.0%). Over the last 7 years revenue compounded at 29.2% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's profit?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd earned ₹−45.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, −197.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹150 Cr. The operating margin ran 0.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's market cap?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹16,842 Cr at a share price of ₹440. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's P/E ratio?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd trades at a P/E of 156.0×, at the 98th percentile of its own 6-year range, against a long-run median of 35.6×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Cohance Lifesciences Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 4 of its last 8 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Cohance Lifesciences Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 156.0× sits at the 98th percentile of its 6-year range (long-run median 35.6×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd growing?

Not right now — Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −23.1% year on year, profit −197.8%, and the margin −19.7 pp at 0.3%. The 7-year compound rates are 29.2% (revenue) and 4.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 11 September 2026.

How is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd performing?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd is in a downtrend, 64 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 23.1% and profit fell 197.8% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.

What stage is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd in?

Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −19.7% latest against +147.9% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 6.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −19.7% latest, profit growth −87.2% latest, eps growth −84.1% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 64 of stage 4), trading −11.2% versus its 200-day average and at 27% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Cohance Lifesciences Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 6.5 years the stock moved +202% against the NIFTY 500's +226% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.

Will Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Cohance Lifesciences Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹440, the price is in a downtrend 64 weeks in. Its P/E of 156.0× sits at the 98th percentile of its own 6-year range. — as of 11 September 2026.

Who owns Cohance Lifesciences Ltd?

Promoters hold 57.5% of Cohance Lifesciences Ltd, foreign institutions 6.5%, domestic institutions 20.1% and the public 15.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters added 7.4 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.

Does Cohance Lifesciences Ltd have too much debt?

No — Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.10, and operating profit covers the interest bill 12×. FY26 borrowings were ₹400 Cr against equity of ₹3,911 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's capex?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd spent ₹3,128 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹293 Cr, with ₹178 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.

What is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's cash flow?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd generated ₹368 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹75.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹293 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹150 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 150% of Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹368 Cr against reported profit of ₹150 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.

Where is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd in its business cycle?

Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 19.0%, against a 8-year band of 19.0%–46.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 0.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.

What could break the Cohance Lifesciences Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved +7.4 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.

Is Cohance Lifesciences Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Cohance Lifesciences Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-11. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI