Hikal Ltd
HIKALHikal Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −12.6% in a year against EPS −153.8% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −12.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −153.8% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is building a base (3 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 91st percentile of its own 11-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 327% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Hikal Ltd trades at ₹225, building a base and 3 weeks into that stage. That is +1.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 71% of a 52-week range of ₹156 to ₹253. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 20 straight weeks.
Today the stock is building a base — week 3 of stage 1, confirmed. At ₹225 it trades +1.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 71% of its 52-week range (₹156–₹253).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +145% while the NIFTY 500 moved +267% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 20 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Hikal Ltd trades at 65.4× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (91st percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 37.0×, measured across 10.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 65.4× is at the pricey end of its own range (91st percentile), against a long-run median of 37.0× measured over 10.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −153.8% against a −12.6% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the −19.4%/yr price move, ~−24.1%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+4.7 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +6.6%/yr price move, ~+0.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+6.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Hikal Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −5.4% latest against +4.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -0.9%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −7.9% | −5.4% | −0.1% | +6.3% |
| Share price | −12.6% | −10.3% | −19.4% | +6.6% |
4-Factor Sector Score
33.0/100 — rank 20 of 24 in Pharma - API & CRAMS · 81% evidence confidence
Hikal Ltd scores 33.0 out of 100 against the 24 companies it is compared with in Pharma - API & CRAMS, ranking 20. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 11.6 + 4.3 + 7.4 + 9.7 = 33. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Hikal Ltd reported ₹403 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +5.9% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 6.3% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,713 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,735 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,713 Cr (−7.9% on the year), capping 10 years at 6.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹403 Cr, +5.9% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −4.8% growth against the decade's 6.3% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −5.4% over the last 4 quarters against −1.9%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Hikal Ltd's operating margin is 9.2% in the Jun 26 quarter, +2.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0% to 23.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 9.2%, +2.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 13.0%–23.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +3.8 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Hikal Ltd posted a net loss of ₹7.4 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹49.0 Cr. That loss is 1.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹22.4 Cr. 4 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹−7.4 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−49.0 Cr (−153.8%).
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −165.4% vs revenue −4.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 327% of Hikal Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹302 Cr of operating cash against ₹−49.0 Cr of profit. After ₹106 Cr of capital spending, ₹196 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹302 Cr against reported profit of ₹−49.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹196 Cr after ₹106 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 327% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 327%: the cash cycle stretched 20 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Hikal Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 138 days in FY26, up from 118 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹483 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,713 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹4.7 Cr, so roughly ₹648 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 94 days, inventory at 172 days — roughly 5.7 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 138 days, looser than FY21's 118.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 172 days to sell; customers pay about 94 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 128 days — netting out to the 138-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,713 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹4.7 Cr — so the 138-day loop keeps roughly ₹648 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹483 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹416 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹94.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Hikal Ltd earns a ROCE of 4% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −8.5 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −2.9% net margin on 0.72× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 4%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −2.9% net margin × 0.72× asset turns × 1.97× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −4.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 3.5% − 12.0% = a −8.5 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Hikal Ltd carries total debt of ₹684 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,199 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.57. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.63 in FY22 to 0.57 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹684 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,199 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.57. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.63 (FY22) to 0.57 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions cut 5.7 points of Hikal Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 1.0% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +4.1 points over the same window, to 7.2%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −5.7 points over 8 quarters to 1.0%; Domestic institutions: +4.1 points over 8 quarters to 7.2%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 68.8%.
Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −5.7 points against domestic institutions +4.1 points over 8 quarters, with promoters holding steady — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Hikal Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Neuland Laboratories LtdNEULANDLAB | 81.2/100Sector-leading setup100% evidence | LEADER | 33.6/35 Revenue 78.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23 pp 100% evidence | 19.9/25 ROCE 26.5% · OPM 35% 100% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 60.7× · PEG 1.05 100% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 7.5% · RS bench 44.6% · 1Y 62.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 33.6 + 19.9 + 12 + 15.7 = 81.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Acutaas Chemicals LtdACUTAAS | 77.3/100Favorable setup76% evidence | 31.9/35 Revenue 41% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9 pp 95% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 31.6% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 71.7× · PEG — 50% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 86.5% · RS bench 43.7% · 1Y 129.5%5 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 31.9 + 20.1 + 9.3 + 16 = 77.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 3IOL Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LtdIOLCP | 73.0/100Favorable setup100% evidence | LEADER | 28.5/35 Revenue 18.5% · PAT 60% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 32.3× · PEG 0.66 100% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 37.2% · RS bench 81.2% · 1Y 100.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.5 + 12.5 + 13.8 + 18.2 = 73 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Laurus Labs LtdLAURUSLABS | 71.2/100Favorable setup93% evidence | LEADER | 32.2/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 17.8% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 5.3/20 P/E 97.3× · PEG 3.33 65% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 22.2% · RS bench 63.4% · 1Y 123.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 32.2 + 18.2 + 5.3 + 15.5 = 71.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 5Gland Pharma LtdGLAND | 69.7/100Favorable setup100% evidence | LEADER | 26.4/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 46.4% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 42.1× · PEG 1.45 100% evidence | 15.2/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench 45.5% · 1Y 54.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.4 + 13.9 + 14.2 + 15.2 = 69.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Divis Laboratories LtdDIVISLAB | 65.4/100Favorable setup100% evidence | LEADER | 26.5/35 Revenue 16.4% · PAT 26.8% · OPM change 11 pp 100% evidence | 19.1/25 ROCE 22% · OPM 41% 100% evidence | 3.5/20 P/E 83.1× · PEG 3.45 100% evidence | 16.3/20 RS sector 3.2% · RS bench 39.9% · 1Y 55.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.5 + 19.1 + 3.5 + 16.3 = 65.4 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 7Shilpa Medicare LtdSHILPAMED | 63.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 27.6/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 10.9% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 66.1× · PEG 6.86 100% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 60.8% · RS bench 111.5% · 1Y 127.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.6 + 10.3 + 5.6 + 19.6 = 63.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Sai Life Sciences LtdSAILIFE | 62.9/100Mixed-positive evidence93% evidence | LEADER | 27.2/35 Revenue 17.6% · PAT 48% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 91.6× · PEG 3.46 65% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 51.7% · 1Y 84.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.2 + 16.6 + 4.9 + 14.2 = 62.9 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 9Granules India LtdGRANULES | 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 26.4/35 Revenue 24.8% · PAT 38.1% · OPM change 3 pp 100% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 23% 100% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 34.7× · PEG 1.27 100% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 37.1% · 1Y 77.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.4 + 15.8 + 10.4 + 9.8 = 62.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Windlas Biotech LtdWINDLAS | 53.5/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.7/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 9.8% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence | 14.5/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 11% 95% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 35.1× · PEG — 50% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 34.7% · 1Y 13.7%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 14.5 + 11.5 + 10.8 = 53.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Anthem Biosciences LtdANTHEM | 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.7/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT 14.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 22.0/25 ROCE 30.4% · OPM 36% 100% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 89.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -4.6% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 13.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 22 + 9.2 + 9.1 = 53 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12SMS Pharmaceuticals LtdSMSPHARMA | 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | TURNING | 19.1/35 Revenue 10.2% · PAT 41.7% · OPM change 0 pp 100% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 20% 100% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 42.4× · PEG 1.53 100% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 96.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 11.3 + 10.3 + 8 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Morepen Laboratories LtdMOREPENLAB | 48.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.3/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 51.6% · OPM change 8 pp 100% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 8.1% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 54× · PEG 1.68 100% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench 130.1% · 1Y 134.8%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 8.5 + 9.7 + 10 = 48.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Blue Jet Healthcare LtdBLUEJET | 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 5.8/35 Revenue -27.5% · PAT -34.6% · OPM change -1 pp 100% evidence | 21.0/25 ROCE 26.1% · OPM 33% 100% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 45.8× · PEG 1.39 100% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -39.2% · RS bench 12% · 1Y -23.6%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.8 + 21 + 13.8 + 5.9 = 46.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 15Supriya Lifescience LtdSUPRIYA | 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | FADING | 16.1/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT 11.2% · OPM change -11 pp 100% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 25.2% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 36.5× · PEG 3.11 100% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench 20.4% · 1Y 38.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 17.1 + 6.9 + 5.2 = 45.3 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 16Concord Biotech LtdCONCORDBIO | 37.8/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 9.2/35 Revenue -6.7% · PAT -23.3% · OPM change 2 pp 100% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 17.1% · OPM 32% 100% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 56.7× · PEG 5.67 100% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -23.6% · RS bench 16.4% · 1Y -9.2%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 14.9 + 6.7 + 7 = 37.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Jubilant Pharmova LtdJUBLPHARMA | 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | TURNING | 11.8/35 Revenue 16.3% · PAT -23% · OPM change -4 pp 100% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 9% · OPM 11% 100% evidence | 13.9/20 P/E 42.1× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 5.6% · 1Y -4.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 6.8 + 13.9 + 5.1 = 37.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 18Piramal Pharma LtdPPLPHARMA | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 13.0/35 Revenue 0.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change 3 pp 74% evidence | 1.4/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector -10.9% · RS bench 21.1% · 1Y 5.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13 + 1.4 + 10 + 10.8 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Solara Active Pharma Sciences LtdSOLARA | 34.7/100Adverse evidence83% evidence | TURNING | 7.9/35 Revenue 15.6% · PAT -80% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 843× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 1.9% · RS bench 38.7% · 1Y 12.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.9 + 3.8 + 8.5 + 14.5 = 34.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 38.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 20Hikal Ltdthis pageHIKAL | 33.0/100Adverse evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.6/35 Revenue -5.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change 2.6 pp 74% evidence | 4.3/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 9.2% 100% evidence | 7.4/20 P/E 65.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -21.7% · RS bench 6.9% · 1Y -14.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 4.3 + 7.4 + 9.7 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21OneSource Specialty Pharma LtdONESOURCE | 27.5/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | BASING | 11.3/35 Revenue 4.3% · PAT -80% · OPM change 0 pp 74% evidence | 3.3/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 27% 100% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -27.3% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y -15%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 3.3 + 10 + 2.9 = 27.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Syngene International LtdSYNGENE | 23.6/100Adverse evidence100% evidence | BASING | 6.7/35 Revenue -3.4% · PAT -56.4% · OPM change -11.3 pp 100% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 10% · OPM 12.3% 100% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 52.2× · PEG 7.87 100% evidence | 0.2/20 RS sector -44.2% · RS bench -22.8% · 1Y -41%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.7 + 8.6 + 8.1 + 0.2 = 23.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Dishman Carbogen Amcis LtdDCAL | 22.1/100Adverse evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.0/35 Revenue 0.2% · PAT -80% · OPM change -11 pp 100% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 9% 100% evidence | 6.4/20 P/E 145× · PEG 2.65 65% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -31% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -39.5%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7 + 4.8 + 6.4 + 3.9 = 22.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Cohance Lifesciences LtdCOHANCE | 20.6/100Adverse evidence82% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 3.0/35 Revenue -19.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -19.7 pp 95% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 156× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -33.4% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y -52.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3 + 6.8 + 5.5 + 5.3 = 20.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Hikal Ltd's share price today?
Hikal Ltd trades at ₹225, −12.6% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,774 Cr. The stock sits at 71% of its 52-week range of ₹156–₹253, +1.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 3 weeks in. — as of 11 September 2026.
What were Hikal Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Hikal Ltd reported revenue of ₹403 Cr and a net loss of ₹7.4 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.60. The operating margin was 9.2%, 2.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's revenue?
Hikal Ltd reported revenue of ₹403 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +5.9% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,713 Cr (−7.9%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 6.3% a year. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's profit?
Hikal Ltd earned ₹−7.4 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−49.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 9.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's market cap?
Hikal Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,774 Cr at a share price of ₹225. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's P/E ratio?
Hikal Ltd trades at a P/E of 65.4×, at the 91st percentile of its own 11-year range, against a long-run median of 37.0×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Hikal Ltd pay a dividend?
Not in its latest year — Hikal Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 12 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Hikal Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Hikal Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 65.4× sits at the 91st percentile of its 11-year range (long-run median 37.0×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 11 September 2026.
How is Hikal Ltd performing?
Hikal Ltd is building a base, 3 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 20 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 11 September 2026.
What stage is Hikal Ltd in?
Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −5.4% latest against +4.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -0.9%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −5.4% latest, profit growth −153.4% latest, eps growth −153.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Hikal Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 3 of stage 1), trading +1.2% versus its 200-day average and at 71% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Hikal Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Hikal Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 20 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +145% against the NIFTY 500's +267% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 11 September 2026.
Will Hikal Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Hikal Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹225, the price is building a base 3 weeks in. Its P/E of 65.4× sits at the 91st percentile of its own 11-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 11 September 2026.
Who owns Hikal Ltd?
Promoters hold 68.8% of Hikal Ltd, foreign institutions 1.0%, domestic institutions 7.2% and the public 22.9% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 5.7 points over 8 quarters. — as of 11 September 2026.
Does Hikal Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Hikal Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.57, and operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. FY26 borrowings were ₹684 Cr against equity of ₹1,199 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's capex?
Hikal Ltd spent ₹483 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹106 Cr, with ₹94.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 11 September 2026.
What is Hikal Ltd's cash flow?
Hikal Ltd generated ₹302 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹196 Cr of free cash flow after ₹106 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−49.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Hikal Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 327% of Hikal Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at -616% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY26, operating cash was ₹302 Cr against reported profit of ₹−49.0 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 11 September 2026.
Where is Hikal Ltd in its business cycle?
Hikal Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 13.0%, against a 13-year band of 13.0%–23.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 9.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 11 September 2026.
What could break the Hikal Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −12.6% in a year while annual EPS moved −153.8% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 11 September 2026.
Is Hikal Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Hikal Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −12.6% in a year against EPS −153.8% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 11 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!