Systematix Corporate Services share price today

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd's share price was ₹76.42 at the close on 30 October 2026. It has been falling for 40 weeks. That is 3.5% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹57 and ₹164, and at that close it sat 18% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Systematix Corporate Services Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 8 weeks in a row.

Over the last 11 years the share price moved +4,169% while the NIFTY 500 moved +243%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

1. Revenue grew again in the June 2026 quarter

   Revenue was ₹56 crore, +43.6% on a year earlier (₹39 crore), after 2 quarters of decline.

3. Profit down on a year earlier for 4 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter profit was ₹-5 crore, -146.7% on a year earlier.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Systematix Corporate Services reported total income of ₹56.3 crore, up 43.6% from ₹39.2 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹4.89 crore, down 146.7% from ₹10.5 crore.

Systematix Corporate Services results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Income and profit in ₹ crore.

Systematix Corporate Services closed at ₹76.42 on 30 October 2026, down 53.7% from ₹165.15 a year earlier (31 October 2025) and up 86.4% over five years. Its highest weekly close since March 2016 was ₹319.15 on 29 November 2024.

Systematix Corporate Services share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 30 Oct 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

509 weekly closes from 30 March 2016 to 30 October 2026.

30 Oct 2026: Systematix Corporate Services closed at ₹76.42, up 1.9% on the week and up 1.9% on the month. 15 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.10 a share.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Total income up 43.6% and profit down 146.7% on a year earlier.

Systematix Corporate Services paid ₹0.10 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.13% at the ₹76.42 close on 30 October 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.10 a share, ex-date 15 September 2026.

Systematix Corporate Services dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Systematix Corporate Services Ltd paid out 10% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 4 of its last 13 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Systematix Corporate Services is on one of our India lists: Penny stocks.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd posted a net loss of ₹4.9 Cr in the Jun 2026 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹14.0 Cr. That loss is 8.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹10.5 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Jun 2026 profit was −₹4.9 Cr, −146.7% on a year earlier. For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹14.0 Cr (−69.6% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +43.6% on a year earlier and the margin moved −35.4 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −183.7% and revenue +13.6%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd reported ₹56.3 Cr of income in the Jun 2026 quarter, +43.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 10 years it has grown 15.8% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹147 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹169 Cr.

For a bank, revenue is everything it earns: interest on its loans plus fees and other income.

FY26 revenue was ₹147 Cr, −12.5% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +13.6% on average, against 15.8% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +14.4%, against +5.9% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating).

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd's net margin was −8.7% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 35.4 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 years it has been between −7.8% and 36.3%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Net margin is what the bank keeps from every ₹100 of revenue after every cost, provision for bad loans and tax. It is the clearest single margin we can read for a lender.

Why: the net margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd does not report loan-quality figures this page can read, so this section says so rather than guess. No bad-loan figures are filed in a form this page can read, and none are guessed from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections carry what this business does report.

Gross NPA is the share of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside for those loans. Falling is good; rising is a warning.

Why: loan quality drives a lender, but its details (new bad loans, recoveries, money set aside) are not in our data for this company. The sections around this one carry what we can back up.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd's revenue was ₹147 Cr in FY26, −12.5% on the year before, so the loan book is not growing. The latest quarter was +43.6% on a year earlier. The net margin on that income is −8.7%, −35.4 percentage points on a year ago.

We read the loan book through revenue: when the book grows, revenue grows with it. It is only a rough guide, because interest-rate changes and fee swings can move it a few points in any year.

Interest income stands in for the size of the loan book; changes in interest rates can move it a few points in any year.

In short: a lender grows well when its loan book grows, its margin stays steady and its loans stay clean. Gross NPA is the loan-quality figure this page uses.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd's P/BV is 3.2×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 55% of past readings. Its usual P/BV (the middle reading) is 3.0×, over 11 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

For a bank or lender we compare the price with book value, the net worth on its balance sheet. P/BV is how many rupees the market pays for each ₹1 of that net worth. Below 1× means the market values it at less than its net worth.

Why the multiple is low: this lender earns about 5% a year on its equity. A lender that earns less on its net worth is valued lower for each rupee of it, and that gap usually closes only if returns improve.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year book value grew while the price moved −53.7%. Price and book value moved together, so the multiple stayed in its range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved +13.3% a year; about +28.1% a year came from book-value growth and about −14.8 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less); over 10 years the price moved +53.0% a year; about +15.6% a year came from book-value growth and about +37.4 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus book-value growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the book value trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 55% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Systematix Corporate Services Ltd's business is getting worse. Profit and EPS growth are shrinking: profit growth is −102.8% in the latest quarter, against +539.6% at its best in 12 quarters. This is based on 8 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.