Fresenius Medical Care AG
FMSFresenius Medical Care AG's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +83.6% against a −9.2% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (4 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −15.8% year on year, and 289% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Fresenius Medical Care AG trades at $23.0, in a downtrend and 4 weeks into that stage. That is −0.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 25% of a 52-week range of $22 to $27. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (3 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 4 of stage 4. At $23.0 it trades −0.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 25% of its 52-week range ($22–$27).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved −47% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-28) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Fresenius Medical Care AG trades at 11.4× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 11.4× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +83.6% against a −9.2% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +0.8%/yr price move, ~+17.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−16.7 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Fresenius Medical Care AG reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — the growth curves are steadily positive, but ROCE at 7.8% is below the 15% bar this page requires to call it Consistent. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +1.5% | +0.4% | — | — |
| Profit | +60.8% | +10.2% | — | — |
| EPS | +83.6% | +13.5% | — | — |
| Stock price | −9.2% | +0.8% | −8.4% | −6.2% |
4-Factor Sector Score
52.9/100 — rank 10 of 30 in Medical Care Facilities · 81% evidence confidence
Fresenius Medical Care AG scores 52.9 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Medical Care Facilities, ranking 10. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.9 + 11.3 + 15.7 + 4 = 52.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Fresenius Medical Care AG reported $4.6 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −5.5% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 2.7% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $19.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $19.4 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $19.6 B (+1.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 2.7% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $4.6 B, −5.5% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −0.7% growth against the decade's 2.7% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −0.7% over the last 4 quarters against −0.3%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +43.2% vs +26.9%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Fresenius Medical Care AG's operating margin is 11.7% in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0% to 10.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 11.7%, +1.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.0%–10.5%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +1.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Fresenius Medical Care AG earned $0.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −15.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $1.2 B. The 4-year compound rate is −0.6%. That is 3.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.2 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.2 B, −15.8% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $1.2 B (+60.8%), and the 4-year compound rate is −0.6%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −5.5% and the margin +1.5 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +64.2% vs revenue −0.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 289% of Fresenius Medical Care AG's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $2.7 B of operating cash against $1.2 B of profit. After $0.9 B of capital spending, $1.8 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $2.7 B against reported profit of $1.2 B, leaving free cash of $1.8 B after $0.9 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 289% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Fresenius Medical Care AG does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $2.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 3.4% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $2.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Fresenius Medical Care AG earns a ROE of 8% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 5% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +0.9 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 6.1% net margin on 0.63× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 8%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 5% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 6.1% net margin × 0.63× asset turns × 2.17× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 6.6% − 5.7% = a +0.9 pp spread. The 5.7% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Fresenius Medical Care AG has 3 quarters of declared dividends on file — too few for a trailing-twelve-month figure. The most recent declaration was $1.49 for Dec 25.
Fresenius Medical Care AG has declared a dividend in 3 of the last 12 reported quarters, most recently $1.49 for Dec 25. That is fewer than four quarters, so no trailing-twelve-month total is shown rather than one built from a partial year.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Fresenius Medical Care AG carries total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $14.2 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.78. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.95 in FY21 to 0.76 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $14.2 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.78. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.95 (FY21) to 0.76 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Fresenius Medical Care AG, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.5 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Fresenius Medical Care AG: the Z-score reads 1.78. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.78 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.78.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Tenet Healthcare CorporationTHC | 65.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench 18.8% · 1Y 39.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 16.4 + 11 + 13.7 = 65.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.CON | 62.0/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 19.8/35 Revenue 15.5% · PAT 12.9% · OPM change 0.8 pp 83% evidence | 14.7/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 16.8% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 13.5% · RS bench 38% · 1Y 76%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 14.7 + 10.1 + 17.4 = 62 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Encompass Health CorporationEHC | 61.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.8/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT 21% · OPM change 0.7 pp 83% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 19% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG 0.68 65% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench 5.4% · 1Y -0.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.8 + 15.8 + 14 + 10.9 = 61.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Addus HomeCare CorporationADUS | 56.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.2/35 Revenue 19.5% · PAT 26.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence | 13.4/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector -17.2% · RS bench 3% · 1Y 5.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 12.3 + 13.4 + 10 = 56.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Nutex Health Inc.NUTX | 55.9/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 17.5/35 Revenue 40.8% · PAT 31.3% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 12.1% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 6.9× · PEG 2.9 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 20.7% · RS bench 47.8% · 1Y 126.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.9 + 6.8 + 15.7 = 55.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6LifeStance Health Group, Inc.LFST | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 22.4/35 Revenue 16.4% · PAT — · OPM change 5 pp 62% evidence | 5.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 106.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 25.5% · RS bench 51.5% · 1Y 144.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.4 + 5.8 + 8.5 + 18.7 = 55.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc.AVAH | 54.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 11.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.9 pp 45% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 5.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.5/20 RS sector 24.4% · RS bench 53.1% · 1Y 76%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.7 + 11.8 + 11.4 + 19.5 = 54.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8PACS Group, Inc.PACS | 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.7 pp 39% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 8.5% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -2.3% · RS bench 18.1% · 1Y 256.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 13.3 + 9.1 + 9.1 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Chemed CorporationCHE | 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.7 pp 45% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 6.6% · OPM 12.9% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench 6.4% · 1Y 12.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 15.6 + 9.3 + 10.3 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Fresenius Medical Care AGthis pageFMS | 52.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.9/35 Revenue -0.7% · PAT 43.7% · OPM change 1.5 pp 83% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 11.9× · PEG 0.22 65% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -9.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 11.3 + 15.7 + 4 = 52.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc.GRDN | 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | TURNING | 17.6/35 Revenue 13.6% · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 62% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 5.3% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 45.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 3% · RS bench 25.9% · 1Y 82.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 12.3 + 8.7 + 12.4 = 51 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12HCA Healthcare, Inc.HCA | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.6/35 Revenue 7.3% · PAT 14.1% · OPM change -0.7 pp 95% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG 0.51 65% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -28.6% · RS bench -10.7% · 1Y 7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 15.6 + 15.1 + 5.6 = 50.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 13Healthcare Services Group, Inc.HCSG | 50.8/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | FADING | 23.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.2 pp 45% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 7.3% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -17.5% · RS bench 1.4% · 1Y 38.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23 + 10.7 + 10.3 + 6.8 = 50.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14National HealthCare CorporationNHC | 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 16.9/35 Revenue 10.3% · PAT 16.7% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 8.4% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 20.3× · PEG 1.48 65% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 24.7% · 1Y 92.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 10.2 + 9.8 + 11.8 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Universal Health Services, Inc.UHS | 48.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 11.2% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 6.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y -3.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 14 + 11.3 + 6.1 = 48.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16agilon health, inc.AGL | 47.6/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | FADING | 18.8/35 Revenue -2.8% · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 62% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 0.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 54% · RS bench 76.9% · 1Y 209.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 4.8 + 10 + 14 = 47.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17The Pennant Group, Inc.PNTG | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | LEADER | 20.3/35 Revenue 36.6% · PAT 20.7% · OPM change 0.1 pp 83% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence | 4.0/20 P/E 35.9× · PEG 3.03 65% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 24.3% · 1Y 76.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 9.2 + 4 + 13.2 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18The Ensign Group, Inc.ENSG | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 9% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 25.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -26.6% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y 8.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.2 + 9.2 + 6.4 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19DaVita Inc.DVA | 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.1/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT -6.9% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 14.1% 76% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG 2.08 65% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 48.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 13.7 + 8.2 + 7.5 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.MD | 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | LEADER | 17.7/35 Revenue -2.2% · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 62% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 10.4× · PEG 1.7 65% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench 9.7% · 1Y 60.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 10.1 + 10 + 7.5 = 45.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Option Care Health, Inc.OPCH | 43.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 5.4% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 15.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -33.3% · RS bench -16.1% · 1Y -13.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.3 + 9.9 + 5 = 43.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.ACHC | 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 45% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 27.2%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 7.5 + 9.5 + 10.7 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Select Medical Holdings CorporationSEM | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | 11.0/35 Revenue 5.8% · PAT -20% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 6.9% 76% evidence | 12.9/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y 9%0 of 1 week ahead to 2026-07-02 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11 + 9.8 + 12.9 + 6.6 = 40.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Ardent Health, Inc.ARDT | 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.5/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT -26.8% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -21.3% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y -16.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.8 + 10.9 + 6 = 40.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Astrana Health, Inc.ASTH | 39.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue 56.8% · PAT -20.5% · OPM change -0.3 pp 83% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 40.2× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -6.8% · RS bench 13.6% · 1Y 35.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.4 + 10.5 + 7.3 = 39.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26InnovAge Holding Corp.INNV | 38.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 10.8/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT — · OPM change -6.8 pp 62% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -8.8% · OPM -11.5% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 103.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.1/20 RS sector 8.9% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 134.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.8 + 3.6 + 8.6 + 15.1 = 38.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Sonida Senior Living, Inc.SNDA | 36.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.0/35 Revenue 25.5% · PAT — · OPM change -20.5 pp 62% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -23.6% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 1.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -12.4% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 46.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13 + 3.8 + 11.5 + 7.7 = 36 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Surgery Partners, Inc.SGRY | 35.1/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.2/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 62% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -17% · 1Y -35.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 7.2 + 10 + 3.7 = 35.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29Brookdale Senior Living Inc.BKD | 33.5/100Adverse evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue -0.4% · PAT — · OPM change 3.2 pp 62% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 6.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -29.3% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y 47.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 5 + 10 + 1.2 = 33.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30COMPASS Pathways plcCMPS | 48.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | LEADER | 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE -12.9% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 23.6% · RS bench 48.2% · 1Y 181.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 5 + 10 + 13.2 = 48.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's stock price today?
Fresenius Medical Care AG trades at $23.0, −9.2% over the past year. The company is valued at $12.0 B. The stock sits at 25% of its 52-week range of $22–$27, −0.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 4 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.
What were Fresenius Medical Care AG's latest quarterly results?
Fresenius Medical Care AG reported revenue of $4.6 B and net profit of $0.2 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue fell 5.5% and profit fell 15.8% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.21. The operating margin was 11.7%, 1.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's revenue?
Fresenius Medical Care AG reported revenue of $4.6 B in the Mar 26 quarter, −5.5% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $19.6 B (+1.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 2.7% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's profit?
Fresenius Medical Care AG earned $0.2 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −15.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $1.2 B. The operating margin ran 11.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's market cap?
Fresenius Medical Care AG's market capitalisation is $12.0 B at a stock price of $23.0. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Fresenius Medical Care AG pay a dividend?
Yes — Fresenius Medical Care AG declared $1.49 per share for Dec 25 (3 quarters on file, too few for a trailing-twelve-month total). The latest quarter is up 3.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's dividend per share?
Fresenius Medical Care AG's most recently declared dividend is $1.49 per share for Dec 25. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Fresenius Medical Care AG growing?
Not right now — Fresenius Medical Care AG's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −5.5% year on year, profit −15.8%, and the margin +1.5 pp at 11.7%. The 4-year compound rates are 2.7% (revenue) and −0.6% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 17 September 2026.
How is Fresenius Medical Care AG performing?
Fresenius Medical Care AG is in a downtrend, 4 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 5.5% and profit fell 15.8% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 3 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.
What stage is Fresenius Medical Care AG in?
Mixed — the growth curves are steadily positive, but ROCE at 7.8% is below the 15% bar this page requires to call it Consistent. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −0.7% latest, profit growth +43.2% latest, eps growth +54.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Fresenius Medical Care AG in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 4 of stage 4), trading −0.5% versus its 200-day average and at 25% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Fresenius Medical Care AG beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Fresenius Medical Care AG is currently behind the S&P 500 (3 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-08-28), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved −47% against the S&P 500's +255% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.
Will Fresenius Medical Care AG's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Fresenius Medical Care AG. What it measures instead: the stock price is $23.0, the price is in a downtrend 4 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Fresenius Medical Care AG have too much debt?
It is moderate — Fresenius Medical Care AG's debt-to-equity is 0.81. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's capex?
Fresenius Medical Care AG spent $2.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.9 B. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Fresenius Medical Care AG's cash flow?
Fresenius Medical Care AG generated $2.7 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $1.8 B of free cash flow after $0.9 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $1.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Fresenius Medical Care AG's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 289% of Fresenius Medical Care AG's reported profit arrived as operating cash. Though the latest year ran at 225% — the trend is the thing to watch. In FY25, operating cash was $2.7 B against reported profit of $1.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.
How financially safe is Fresenius Medical Care AG?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.78 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 17 September 2026.
Where is Fresenius Medical Care AG in its business cycle?
Fresenius Medical Care AG's FY25 operating margin was 9.3%, against a 5-year band of 7.0%–10.5%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 11.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.
What could break the Fresenius Medical Care AG story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +83.6% against a −9.2% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Fresenius Medical Care AG a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Fresenius Medical Care AG's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!