Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +105.9% in a year while annual EPS moved +13.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (68 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +150.0% year on year, and 197% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. trades at $542, in a confirmed uptrend and 68 weeks into that stage. That is +7.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 44% of a 52-week range of $275 to $882. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 68 of stage 2. At $542 it trades +7.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 44% of its 52-week range ($275–$882).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +10,100% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. trades at 39.0× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 39.0× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +13.4% against a +105.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +107.1%/yr price move, ~+41.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+65.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +92.9% at its peak to +32.1% but is still expanding, ROCE lifting at 33.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +17.5% | +12.0% | — | — |
| Profit | +14.8% | +45.8% | — | — |
| EPS | +13.4% | +39.2% | — | — |
| Stock price | +105.9% | +107.1% | +89.5% | +56.4% |
4-Factor Sector Score
62.8/100 — rank 5 of 30 in Engineering & Construction · 66% evidence confidence
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. scores 62.8 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Engineering & Construction, ranking 5. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 24.3 + 15.4 + 11.8 + 11.3 = 62.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported $0.8 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +93.0% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 15.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $2.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $2.9 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $2.5 B (+17.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 15.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.8 B, +93.0% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +41.8% growth against the decade's 15.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +37.6% over the last 4 quarters against +19.9%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +32.1% vs +57.1%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s operating margin is 16.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.8% to 16.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 16.9%, +2.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 7.8%–16.5%, and FY25's 16.5% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.9 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +150.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is 50.8%. That is 12.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +150.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.3 B (+14.8%), and the 4-year compound rate is 50.8%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +93.0% and the margin +2.9 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +57.0% vs revenue +41.8%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 197% of Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.4 B of operating cash against $0.3 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $0.4 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.4 B against reported profit of $0.3 B, leaving free cash of $0.4 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 197% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. earns a ROE of 28% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 17% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +27.3 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 12.4% net margin on 0.95× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 28%, recovered from a FY21 trough of 17% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 12.4% net margin × 0.95× asset turns × 2.37× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 27.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 41.7% − 14.4% = a +27.3 pp spread. The 14.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. carries total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $1.2 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.28 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.31 in FY21 to 0.32 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $1.2 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.28. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.31 (FY21) to 0.32 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
4.3% of Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 4.3% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 1.4 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.: the Z-score reads 6.63. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 6.63 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 6.63.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Argan, Inc.AGX | 69.3/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.6/35 Revenue 14.5% · PAT 61% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 15.6% 76% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 58.9× · PEG 0.99 65% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 24.9% · RS bench 25.1% · 1Y 158.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 16.1 + 12.3 + 14.3 = 69.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Comfort Systems USA, Inc.FIX | 66.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 39% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 48.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 24.3% · RS bench 25% · 1Y 156.7%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 20.1 + 9.3 + 13.8 = 66.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3IES Holdings, Inc.IESC | 65.9/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | LEADER | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 32% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 11.2% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.9/20 RS sector 36% · RS bench 37.9% · 1Y 119.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 17.1 + 10.2 + 18.9 = 65.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Everus Construction Group, Inc.ECG | 64.6/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue 29.7% · PAT 46.7% · OPM change 1.3 pp 53% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 7.5% 57% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 27.1× · PEG 0.58 65% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 90.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 13.8 + 15.2 + 13.1 = 64.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.this pageSTRL | 62.8/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | FADING | 24.3/35 Revenue 36.9% · PAT 32.5% · OPM change 3.7 pp 53% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 16.7% 57% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG 1.19 65% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y 78.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 15.4 + 11.8 + 11.3 = 62.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Dycom Industries, Inc.DY | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.2/35 Revenue 29.8% · PAT 34.2% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 7.3% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 41.3× · PEG 1.24 65% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 2.9% · 1Y 48.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 11.9 + 11.1 + 12.3 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7EMCOR Group, Inc.EME | 56.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 39% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 12.2% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 25.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 32.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 16.4 + 10.7 + 10.1 = 56.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8MYR Group Inc.MYRG | 56.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 21.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 39% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 47.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 5.8% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 83.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 12.6 + 9.5 + 12.3 = 56.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Arcosa, Inc.ACA | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.6/35 Revenue 12.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.7 pp 53% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 8.2% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 12% · RS bench 14.7% · 1Y 51.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 9.3 + 8.5 + 17.8 = 55.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Tetra Tech, Inc.TTEK | 55.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.8 pp 39% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 10.8% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector -8.7% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y -5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 10.9 = 55.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Quanta Services, Inc.PWR | 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 39% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 82.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 15.7% · RS bench 17.3% · 1Y 79.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 11.6 + 8.8 + 14.5 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Exponent, Inc.EXPO | 51.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.6 pp 39% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 24.9% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 27.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y -4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 15 + 10.5 + 8.2 = 51.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Tutor Perini CorporationTPC | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 25.6% · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 40% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 4.3% 57% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 52.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 3.6% · RS bench 6% · 1Y 51.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 8.2 + 9.2 + 15.7 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Cadeler A/SCDLR | 48.8/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.2 pp 53% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 6.2% 57% evidence | 16.5/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.11 65% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -10.4% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y 8.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 7.7 + 16.5 + 4.9 = 48.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Stantec Inc.STN | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 17.6/35 Revenue 7.6% · PAT 27.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 53% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 8.3% 57% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 28× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -32.4% · RS bench -29.6% · 1Y -33.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 11.4 + 13.1 + 5 = 47.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16AECOMACM | 44.9/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 12.8/35 Revenue -0.4% · PAT 2.6% · OPM change -0.3 pp 53% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 6.5% 57% evidence | 15.3/20 P/E 22.1× · PEG 0.73 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -30.7% · 1Y -36%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 11.4 + 15.3 + 5.4 = 44.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17APi Group CorporationAPG | 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 39% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 95.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 20.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 8.9 + 8.7 + 9.1 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Fluor CorporationFLR | 43.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 11.8/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -422.2% · OPM change 0.2 pp 53% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 2.5% 57% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 25.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 23%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 7.4 + 10.8 + 13.3 = 43.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19KBR, Inc.KBR | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 14.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 39% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -24.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 10.3 + 11.4 + 7.3 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Granite Construction IncorporatedGVA | 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 39% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 34.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -11.4% · RS bench -9.3% · 1Y 15.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 9.2 + 10.1 + 4.7 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21MasTec, Inc.MTZ | 40.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 39% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 66.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -12% · RS bench -11.1% · 1Y 49.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 8.4 + 9 + 3.1 = 40.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Construction Partners, Inc.ROAD | 39.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue 48.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.1 pp 53% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 4.9% 57% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 48.7× · PEG 1.79 65% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -17.5% · 1Y -4.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 8.3 + 8.2 + 3 = 39.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Ameresco, Inc.AMRC | 37.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue 8.5% · PAT -9.3% · OPM change -1.3 pp 40% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 2.6% 57% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 44× · PEG 1.49 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y 38.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.2 + 9.9 + 5.4 = 37 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Jacobs Solutions Inc.J | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 11.3/35 Revenue 12.7% · PAT -9.3% · OPM change -9.4 pp 53% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -2.2% 57% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 38.7× · PEG 2.2 65% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -6.3% · 1Y -3.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 6.8 + 6.9 + 10.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25TopBuild Corp.BLD | 35.2/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | 11.8/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT -15.2% · OPM change -2.3 pp 53% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 12.1% 57% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG 2.97 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -30% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y 2%2 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-07-02 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 12.8 + 6.3 + 4.3 = 35.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Primoris Services CorporationPRIM | 34.3/100Adverse evidence66% evidence | BASING | 13.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT 20.4% · OPM change -2.7 pp 53% evidence | 7.9/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 1.6% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG 1.57 65% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -38.4% · RS bench -36.6% · 1Y -18.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 7.9 + 10 + 2.5 = 34.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.CDNL | 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 15% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 8.8% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 403× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.5 + 8.5 + 10 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Ferrovial N.V.FER | 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 71.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y 26.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 9.8 + 8.9 + 8 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Legence Corp.LGN | 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.7/35 Revenue 44.3% · PAT 13.3% · OPM change -1.1 pp 40% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.2% 57% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 192.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 6.5 + 8.6 + 10 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Willdan Group, Inc.WLDN | 37.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | BASING | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 39% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 4.7% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -30.8% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y -32.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 7.2 + 11.1 + 4 = 37.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s stock price today?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. trades at $542, +105.9% over the past year. The company is valued at $17.0 B. The stock sits at 44% of its 52-week range of $275–$882, +7.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 68 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported revenue of $0.8 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 93.0% and profit rose 150.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $3.09. The operating margin was 16.9%, 2.9 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s revenue?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported revenue of $0.8 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +93.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $2.5 B (+17.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 15.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s profit?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +150.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The operating margin ran 16.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s market cap?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $17.0 B at a stock price of $542. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pay a dividend?
No — Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. growing?
Yes — Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +93.0% year on year, profit +150.0%, and the margin +2.9 pp at 16.9%. The 4-year compound rates are 15.3% (revenue) and 50.8% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. performing?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is in a confirmed uptrend, 68 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 93.0% and profit rose 150.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. in?
Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +92.9% at its peak to +32.1% but is still expanding, ROCE lifting at 33.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +37.6% latest, profit growth +32.1% latest, eps growth +30.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 68 of stage 2), trading +7.1% versus its 200-day average and at 44% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +10,100% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $542, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 68 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.?
Somewhat — short interest is 4.3% of Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s tradable float, about 1.4 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. have too much debt?
No — Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.24. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s capex?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s cash flow?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. generated $0.4 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.4 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.3 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 197% of Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.4 B against reported profit of $0.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 6.63 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. in its business cycle?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 16.5%, against a 5-year band of 7.8%–16.5%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 16.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +105.9% in a year while annual EPS moved +13.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.