TIM S.A. share price today

TIM S.A.'s share price was $18.20 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 26 weeks. That is 17.6% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $17 and $28, and at that close it sat 8% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today TIM S.A. is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 27 weeks running.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved +68% while the S&P 500 moved +261%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 1 May 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

TIM S.A. declared ₹1.13 per local share for Dec 2025, and ₹1.58 over the last four reported quarters. It reports in its home currency, and one US-listed share can stand for several local shares, so we do not set this against the dollar price or show a yield.

TIM S.A. is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

TIM S.A. earned ₹1.0 B of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, −0.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹4.3 B. Over 4 years profit has grown 9.9% a year on average. That is 13.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.0 B.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was ₹4.3 B (+36.7% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +5.5% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.8 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +19.7% and revenue +5.2%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

TIM S.A. reported ₹7.0 B of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +5.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 10.2% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹26.6 B.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹27.4 B.

FY25 revenue was ₹26.6 B, +4.6% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +5.2% on average, against 10.2% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +5.2%, against +5.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +19.3%, against +18.1% a year (stabilising).

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

TIM S.A.'s operating margin was 24.7% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 0.8 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 5 years it has been between 16.0% and 25.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Across 5 years it has been between 16.0% and 25.0%, and FY25's 25.0% is the highest of them.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.8 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +2.1 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

When margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so watch whether they hold.

Over the last 3 years, 371% of TIM S.A.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in ₹13.4 B of operating cash against ₹4.3 B of profit. After ₹4.5 B of spending on assets, ₹8.9 B was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

TIM S.A. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹14.0 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 17.5% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: ₹14.0 B over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

TIM S.A.'s P/E is 11.0×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

TIM S.A.'s business is growing steadily. Revenue and profit growth have stayed positive throughout, and ROCE is steady at 16.5%. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: steady growth with healthy returns is how a business compounds over time.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

TIM S.A. earned a ROE of 18% in FY25. That is up from a low of 7% in FY22. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is left out: on sales this small it reads 18%, a number that says nothing useful about the business. It comes from a 16.2% net margin and 0.47× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 16.2% net margin × 0.47× asset turnover × 2.37× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 18.0% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing is a big part of it.

TIM S.A. has total debt of ₹16.5 B against shareholder equity of ₹25.0 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.66× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.51 in FY21 to 0.69 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for TIM S.A., so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 4.3 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For TIM S.A., the Z-score is 2.18. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the grey area between the two. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.18 is in the grey area, neither clearly safe nor clearly in trouble.

There is no score against its industry: TIM S.A. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Telecom Services.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

TIM S.A. is the 19th largest of 44 Telecom Services companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Globalstar, Inc., Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk and KT Corporation. Just below it: Liberty Broadband Corporation, VEON and Telecom Argentina S.A.

Telecom Services companies close in size

16. Globalstar, Inc. $11 billion
17. Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk $10.2 billion
18. KT Corporation $9 billion
19. TIM S.A. $8.6 billion
20. Liberty Broadband Corporation $6.6 billion
21. VEON Ltd. $5.4 billion
22. Telecom Argentina S.A. $4.9 billion

All 44 Telecom Services companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1009. Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. $8.7 billion · REIT - Industrial
1010. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. $8.7 billion · Engineering & Construction
1011. TIM S.A. $8.6 billion
1012. The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. $8.6 billion · Insurance - Property & Casualty
1013. Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. $8.6 billion · Electrical Equipment & Parts

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.