Tutor Perini Corporation
TPCTutor Perini Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 9 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (9 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed — profit +0.0% year on year, and 222% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Tutor Perini Corporation trades at $85.7, in a confirmed uptrend and 9 weeks into that stage. That is +13.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 78% of a 52-week range of $57 to $94. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (14 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 9 of stage 2. At $85.7 it trades +13.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 78% of its 52-week range ($57–$94).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +253% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (14 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-01) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Tutor Perini Corporation trades at 58.6× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 58.6× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Tutor Perini Corporation reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +27.9% | +13.5% | — | — |
| Stock price | +87.8% | +120.1% | +42.8% | +13.3% |
4-Factor Sector Score
49.6/100 — rank 13 of 30 in Engineering & Construction · 51% evidence confidence
Tutor Perini Corporation scores 49.6 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Engineering & Construction, ranking 13. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.5 + 8.2 + 9.2 + 15.7 = 49.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Tutor Perini Corporation reported $1.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.2% year on year. That is the 10th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 4.5% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $5.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $5.7 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $5.5 B (+27.9% on the year), capping 4 years at 4.5% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $1.4 B, +11.2% year on year — the 10th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +26.3% growth against the decade's 4.5% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +25.6% over the last 4 quarters against +17.1%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Tutor Perini Corporation's operating margin is 4.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −5.3% to 5.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 4.3%, −1.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −5.3%–5.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −1.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.4 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Tutor Perini Corporation earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. The 4-year compound rate is 1.9%. That is 2.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, +0.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.1 B (null), and the 4-year compound rate is 1.9%.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 222% of Tutor Perini Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.8 B of operating cash against $0.1 B of profit. After $0.2 B of capital spending, $0.6 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.8 B against reported profit of $0.1 B, leaving free cash of $0.6 B after $0.2 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 222% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Tutor Perini Corporation does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Tutor Perini Corporation earns a ROE of 11% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −13% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +1.2 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 2.5% net margin on 1.07× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 11%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −13% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 2.5% net margin × 1.07× asset turns × 4.10× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 11.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 16.1% − 14.9% = a +1.2 pp spread. The 14.9% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Tutor Perini Corporation has 2 quarters of declared dividends on file — too few for a trailing-twelve-month figure. The most recent declaration was $0.06 for Mar 26.
Tutor Perini Corporation has declared a dividend in 2 of the last 12 reported quarters, most recently $0.06 for Mar 26. That is fewer than four quarters, so no trailing-twelve-month total is shown rather than one built from a partial year.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Tutor Perini Corporation carries total debt of $0.4 B against shareholder equity of $1.3 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.31. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.59 in FY21 to 0.33 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.4 B against shareholder equity of $1.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.31. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.59 (FY21) to 0.33 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
4.9% of Tutor Perini Corporation's tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.7 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 4.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.7 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Tutor Perini Corporation: the Z-score reads 1.94. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.94 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.94.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Argan, Inc.AGX | 69.3/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.6/35 Revenue 14.5% · PAT 61% · OPM change 3 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 15.6% 76% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 58.9× · PEG 0.99 65% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 24.9% · RS bench 25.1% · 1Y 158.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.6 + 16.1 + 12.3 + 14.3 = 69.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Comfort Systems USA, Inc.FIX | 66.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 39% evidence | 20.1/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 48.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 24.3% · RS bench 25% · 1Y 156.7%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 20.1 + 9.3 + 13.8 = 66.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3IES Holdings, Inc.IESC | 65.9/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | LEADER | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 32% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 11.2% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.9/20 RS sector 36% · RS bench 37.9% · 1Y 119.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 17.1 + 10.2 + 18.9 = 65.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Everus Construction Group, Inc.ECG | 64.6/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue 29.7% · PAT 46.7% · OPM change 1.3 pp 53% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 7.5% 57% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 27.1× · PEG 0.58 65% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 90.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 13.8 + 15.2 + 13.1 = 64.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.STRL | 62.8/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | FADING | 24.3/35 Revenue 36.9% · PAT 32.5% · OPM change 3.7 pp 53% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 16.7% 57% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG 1.19 65% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench 5.1% · 1Y 78.9%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 15.4 + 11.8 + 11.3 = 62.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Dycom Industries, Inc.DY | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.2/35 Revenue 29.8% · PAT 34.2% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 7.3% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 41.3× · PEG 1.24 65% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 2.9% · 1Y 48.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 11.9 + 11.1 + 12.3 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7EMCOR Group, Inc.EME | 56.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 39% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 12.2% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 25.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 32.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 16.4 + 10.7 + 10.1 = 56.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8MYR Group Inc.MYRG | 56.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 21.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 39% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 47.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 5.8% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 83.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 12.6 + 9.5 + 12.3 = 56.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Arcosa, Inc.ACA | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.6/35 Revenue 12.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.7 pp 53% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 8.2% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 12% · RS bench 14.7% · 1Y 51.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 9.3 + 8.5 + 17.8 = 55.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Tetra Tech, Inc.TTEK | 55.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.8 pp 39% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 10.8% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector -8.7% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y -5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 10.9 = 55.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Quanta Services, Inc.PWR | 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 39% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 82.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 15.7% · RS bench 17.3% · 1Y 79.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 11.6 + 8.8 + 14.5 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Exponent, Inc.EXPO | 51.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.6 pp 39% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 24.9% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 27.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y -4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 15 + 10.5 + 8.2 = 51.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Tutor Perini Corporationthis pageTPC | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 25.6% · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 40% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 4.3% 57% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 52.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 3.6% · RS bench 6% · 1Y 51.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 8.2 + 9.2 + 15.7 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Cadeler A/SCDLR | 48.8/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change -1.2 pp 53% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 6.2% 57% evidence | 16.5/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.11 65% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -10.4% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y 8.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 7.7 + 16.5 + 4.9 = 48.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Stantec Inc.STN | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 17.6/35 Revenue 7.6% · PAT 27.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 53% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 8.3% 57% evidence | 13.1/20 P/E 28× · PEG 1.01 65% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -32.4% · RS bench -29.6% · 1Y -33.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 11.4 + 13.1 + 5 = 47.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16AECOMACM | 44.9/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 12.8/35 Revenue -0.4% · PAT 2.6% · OPM change -0.3 pp 53% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 6.5% 57% evidence | 15.3/20 P/E 22.1× · PEG 0.73 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -30.7% · 1Y -36%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 11.4 + 15.3 + 5.4 = 44.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17APi Group CorporationAPG | 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 39% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 95.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 20.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 8.9 + 8.7 + 9.1 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Fluor CorporationFLR | 43.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 11.8/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -422.2% · OPM change 0.2 pp 53% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 2.5% 57% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 25.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 23%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 7.4 + 10.8 + 13.3 = 43.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19KBR, Inc.KBR | 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 14.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 39% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 9.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -16.8% · 1Y -24.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 10.3 + 11.4 + 7.3 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Granite Construction IncorporatedGVA | 42.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 39% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM -3.4% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 34.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -11.4% · RS bench -9.3% · 1Y 15.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 9.2 + 10.1 + 4.7 = 42.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21MasTec, Inc.MTZ | 40.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 39% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 66.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -12% · RS bench -11.1% · 1Y 49.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 8.4 + 9 + 3.1 = 40.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Construction Partners, Inc.ROAD | 39.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue 48.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.1 pp 53% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 4.9% 57% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 48.7× · PEG 1.79 65% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -17.5% · 1Y -4.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 8.3 + 8.2 + 3 = 39.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Ameresco, Inc.AMRC | 37.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue 8.5% · PAT -9.3% · OPM change -1.3 pp 40% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 2.6% 57% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 44× · PEG 1.49 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y 38.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.2 + 9.9 + 5.4 = 37 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Jacobs Solutions Inc.J | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 11.3/35 Revenue 12.7% · PAT -9.3% · OPM change -9.4 pp 53% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -2.2% 57% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 38.7× · PEG 2.2 65% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -6.3% · 1Y -3.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 6.8 + 6.9 + 10.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25TopBuild Corp.BLD | 35.2/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | 11.8/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT -15.2% · OPM change -2.3 pp 53% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 3.6% · OPM 12.1% 57% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG 2.97 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -30% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y 2%2 of 7 weeks ahead to 2026-07-02 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 12.8 + 6.3 + 4.3 = 35.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Primoris Services CorporationPRIM | 34.3/100Adverse evidence66% evidence | BASING | 13.9/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT 20.4% · OPM change -2.7 pp 53% evidence | 7.9/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 1.6% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG 1.57 65% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -38.4% · RS bench -36.6% · 1Y -18.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 7.9 + 10 + 2.5 = 34.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.CDNL | 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional22% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 15% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 8.8% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 403× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —12 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.5 + 8.5 + 10 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Ferrovial N.V.FER | 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 71.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y 26.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 9.8 + 8.9 + 8 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Legence Corp.LGN | 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional31% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.7/35 Revenue 44.3% · PAT 13.3% · OPM change -1.1 pp 40% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.2% 57% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 192.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 6.5 + 8.6 + 10 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Willdan Group, Inc.WLDN | 37.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | BASING | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 39% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 4.7% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -30.8% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y -32.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 7.2 + 11.1 + 4 = 37.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's stock price today?
Tutor Perini Corporation trades at $85.7, +87.8% over the past year. The company is valued at $5.0 B. The stock sits at 78% of its 52-week range of $57–$94, +13.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 9 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Tutor Perini Corporation's latest quarterly results?
Tutor Perini Corporation reported revenue of $1.4 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 11.2% and profit rose 0.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.48. The operating margin was 4.3%, 1.3 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's revenue?
Tutor Perini Corporation reported revenue of $1.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.2% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $5.5 B (+27.9%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 4.5% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's profit?
Tutor Perini Corporation earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. The operating margin ran 4.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's market cap?
Tutor Perini Corporation's market capitalisation is $5.0 B at a stock price of $85.7. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Tutor Perini Corporation pay a dividend?
Yes — Tutor Perini Corporation declared $0.06 per share for Mar 26 (2 quarters on file, too few for a trailing-twelve-month total). — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's dividend per share?
Tutor Perini Corporation's most recently declared dividend is $0.06 per share for Mar 26. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tutor Perini Corporation growing?
The picture is mixed for Tutor Perini Corporation: latest-quarter revenue +11.2% year on year, profit +0.0%, and the margin −1.3 pp at 4.3%. The 4-year compound rates are 4.5% (revenue) and 1.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: mixed — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Tutor Perini Corporation performing?
Tutor Perini Corporation is in a confirmed uptrend, 9 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 11.2% and profit rose 0.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 14 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tutor Perini Corporation in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 9 of stage 2), trading +13.5% versus its 200-day average and at 78% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tutor Perini Corporation beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Tutor Perini Corporation is currently behind the S&P 500 (14 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-01), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +253% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Tutor Perini Corporation's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Tutor Perini Corporation. What it measures instead: the stock price is $85.7, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 9 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Tutor Perini Corporation?
Somewhat — short interest is 4.9% of Tutor Perini Corporation's tradable float, about 3.7 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Tutor Perini Corporation have too much debt?
It is moderate — Tutor Perini Corporation's debt-to-equity is 0.37. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's capex?
Tutor Perini Corporation spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.2 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tutor Perini Corporation's cash flow?
Tutor Perini Corporation generated $0.8 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.6 B of free cash flow after $0.2 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tutor Perini Corporation's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 222% of Tutor Perini Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.8 B against reported profit of $0.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Tutor Perini Corporation?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.94 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Tutor Perini Corporation in its business cycle?
Tutor Perini Corporation's FY25 operating margin was 4.2%, against a 5-year band of −5.3%–5.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 4.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Tutor Perini Corporation story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 9 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tutor Perini Corporation a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Tutor Perini Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.