Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.'s price has outrun its earnings. +87.8% in a year against EPS −19.9% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +87.8% in a year while annual EPS moved −19.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (28 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 96th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +175.0% year on year, and 141% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. trades at $78.3, in a confirmed uptrend and 28 weeks into that stage. That is +22.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 94% of a 52-week range of $43 to $81. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 28 of stage 2. At $78.3 it trades +22.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 94% of its 52-week range ($43–$81).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +296% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. trades at 6.5× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (96th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 3.2×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 6.5× is at the pricey end of its own range (96th percentile), against a long-run median of 3.2× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −19.9% against a +87.8% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +48.7%/yr price move, ~−14.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+63.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Improving Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reads as improving on its fundamental arc. Improving — profit growth bottomed 7 quarters ago at −33.3% and has held its recovery at +9.1%, ROCE holding at 8.8%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: a sustained climb off the trough is the setup this page is built to catch — the question moves to what you pay for it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +0.8% | +3.5% | — | — |
| Profit | −21.6% | −20.6% | — | — |
| EPS | −19.9% | −20.1% | — | — |
| Stock price | +87.8% | +48.7% | +28.4% | +13.1% |
4-Factor Sector Score
59.7/100 — rank 4 of 23 in Marine Shipping · 81% evidence confidence
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. scores 59.7 out of 100 against the 23 companies it is compared with in Marine Shipping, ranking 4. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 20.5 + 13.1 + 12.7 + 13.4 = 59.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +20.0% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 17.2% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.4 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.3 B (+0.8% on the year), capping 4 years at 17.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +20.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +8.0% growth against the decade's 17.2% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +7.6% over the last 4 quarters against +3.4%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +9.1% vs −5.1%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s operating margin is 38.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +12.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 31.3% to 62.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 38.9%, +12.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 31.3%–62.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +12.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +3.9 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +175.0% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is −13.2%. That is 30.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +175.0% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.3 B (−21.6%), and the 4-year compound rate is −13.2%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +20.0% and the margin +12.2 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +34.6% vs revenue +8.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 141% of Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.5 B of operating cash against $0.3 B of profit. After $0.5 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.3 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.5 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 141% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $2.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 49.8% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $2.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. earns a ROE of 9% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −2.2 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 21.6% net margin on 0.23× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 9%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 21.6% net margin × 0.23× asset turns × 1.78× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 4.7% − 6.9% = a −2.2 pp spread. The 6.9% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. paid $0.21 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 20.0% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.06 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $78.3 that is a trailing yield of 0.27%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. paid $0.21 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.06 for Mar 26. That is up 20.0% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $78.3 the trailing twelve months work out to 0.27% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. carries total debt of $2.4 B against shareholder equity of $3.4 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.69. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.91 in FY21 to 0.71 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $2.4 B against shareholder equity of $3.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.69. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.91 (FY21) to 0.71 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Navios Maritime Partners L.P., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.9 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.ECO | 73.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence | TURNING | 31.3/35 Revenue 33.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 29.8 pp 83% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 8.6% · OPM 57.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 8.9× · PEG 0.84 65% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 25.6% · 1Y 142.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.3 + 17.6 + 11 + 13.7 = 73.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Safe Bulkers, Inc.SB | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 45% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 35.6% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 8.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 8.1% · RS bench 22.6% · 1Y 85%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 13.8 + 10.2 + 17.9 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.SHIP | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 43.9 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 36.9% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 4.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 132.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 12.8 + 11.1 + 17 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Navios Maritime Partners L.P.this pageNMM | 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 3.9% · OPM change 13.4 pp 83% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 38.3% 76% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 5.7× · PEG 0.71 65% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 76.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 13.1 + 12.7 + 13.4 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Danaos CorporationDAC | 59.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 10.9% · OPM change 1.8 pp 83% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 49.3% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 4× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 14.1/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 15.5% · 1Y 46.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 13.8 + 14 + 14.1 = 59.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Himalaya Shipping Ltd.HSHP | 58.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 100% · OPM change 21.7 pp 62% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 51.2% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 10.3% · RS bench 23.8% · 1Y 117.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 15.8 = 58.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Ardmore Shipping CorporationASC | 57.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.4 pp 45% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 29.1% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 5.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.5% · 1Y 65.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 14.1 + 10.8 + 9.8 = 57.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Star Bulk Carriers Corp.SBLK | 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 15.7/35 Revenue -11.6% · PAT -37.5% · OPM change 22.9 pp 62% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 18× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench 13.8% · 1Y 49.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.1 + 12.2 + 13.3 = 55.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9SFL Corporation Ltd.SFL | 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue -16.4% · PAT -44.2% · OPM change 26.6 pp 62% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 32.3% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 45× · PEG 0.19 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 32.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 10.4 + 12 + 11.9 = 53.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Euroseas Ltd.ESEA | 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 10.3/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 2.3% · OPM change -10.6 pp 83% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 61.2% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.13 65% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench 10.6% · 1Y 55.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 16.2 + 15.7 + 8.8 = 51 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 11Matson, Inc.MATX | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.1/35 Revenue -4.6% · PAT -16% · OPM change -2.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 12× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 15.6% · RS bench 30% · 1Y 98.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 9 + 11.2 + 19.6 = 50.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 12StealthGas Inc.GASS | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.2/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT 78.1% · OPM change 2.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 32.4% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 5.5× · PEG 0.12 65% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -4.3% · 1Y 28.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 9.9 + 15.2 + 3.9 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Global Ship Lease, Inc.GSL | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.6/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 0.5% · OPM change -18.1 pp 83% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 49.2% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y 45.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 14.8 + 15.2 + 7.6 = 49.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 14Diana Shipping Inc.DSX | 48.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 15.4/20 P/E 7.1× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 60.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 8.4 + 15.4 + 7.2 = 48 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Genco Shipping & Trading LimitedGNK | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -62.2% · OPM change 25.3 pp 62% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 59.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 10.3 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Kirby CorporationKEX | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 32.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 12.3 + 9.2 + 4.5 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Costamare Inc.CMRE | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 46.1% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 5.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y 43.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 14 + 10.9 + 3 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Hafnia LimitedHAFN | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.9/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -26.1% · OPM change 12.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 26.5% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 35.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 13.8 + 10.1 + 2.3 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.PANL | 41.1/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.9/35 Revenue 22.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.7 pp 62% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG 1.68 65% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -14.9% · RS bench -3.1% · 1Y 51.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 7 + 7.6 + 4.6 = 41.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.CCEC | 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -13 pp 45% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 44.6% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -4.9% · 1Y -5.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 11 + 9.8 + 3.4 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.SMHI | 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 10.3/35 Revenue -18.2% · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -14.4% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 20.8% · 1Y 47.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 3 + 8.9 + 14.9 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.ZIM | 30.2/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.5/35 Revenue -29.1% · PAT -95.8% · OPM change -24.4 pp 83% evidence | 4.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 32.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 76.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.5 + 4.3 + 8.8 + 13.6 = 30.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 23Costamare Bulkers Holdings LimitedCMDB | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.6 pp 26% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 9.3% · 1Y 107.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 6.7 + 10 + 8.3 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s stock price today?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. trades at $78.3, +87.8% over the past year. The company is valued at $2.0 B. The stock sits at 94% of its 52-week range of $43–$81, +22.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 28 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s latest quarterly results?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported revenue of $0.4 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 20.0% and profit rose 175.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $3.64. The operating margin was 38.9%, 12.2 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s revenue?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported revenue of $0.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +20.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.3 B (+0.8%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 17.2% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s profit?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +175.0% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The operating margin ran 38.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s market cap?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s market capitalisation is $2.0 B at a stock price of $78.3. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s P/E ratio?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. trades at a P/E of 6.5×, at the 96th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 3.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Navios Maritime Partners L.P. pay a dividend?
Yes — Navios Maritime Partners L.P. declared $0.06 per share for Mar 26, and $0.21 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 20.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s dividend per share?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s most recently declared dividend is $0.06 per share for Mar 26, giving $0.21 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s dividend yield?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s trailing dividend yield is 0.27%: $0.21 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $78.3. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. overvalued?
On its own history, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 6.5× sits at the 96th percentile of its 4-year range (long-run median 3.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. growing?
Yes — Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +20.0% year on year, profit +175.0%, and the margin +12.2 pp at 38.9%. The 4-year compound rates are 17.2% (revenue) and −13.2% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. performing?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is in a confirmed uptrend, 28 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 20.0% and profit rose 175.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. in?
Improving — profit growth bottomed 7 quarters ago at −33.3% and has held its recovery at +9.1%, ROCE holding at 8.8%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +7.6% latest, profit growth +9.1% latest, eps growth +8.0% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 28 of stage 2), trading +22.9% versus its 200-day average and at 94% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is currently behind the S&P 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +296% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Navios Maritime Partners L.P. What it measures instead: the stock price is $78.3, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 28 weeks in. Its P/E of 6.5× sits at the 96th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Navios Maritime Partners L.P. have too much debt?
It is moderate — Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s debt-to-equity is 0.69. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s capex?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. spent $2.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.5 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s cash flow?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. generated $0.5 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.5 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.3 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 141% of Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. in its business cycle?
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s FY25 operating margin was 31.3%, against a 5-year band of 31.3%–62.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 38.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Navios Maritime Partners L.P. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +87.8% in a year while annual EPS moved −19.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Navios Maritime Partners L.P. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Navios Maritime Partners L.P.'s price has outrun its earnings. +87.8% in a year against EPS −19.9% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.