Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +130.4% in a year while annual EPS moved −20.8% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is between stages while the P/E sits at the 39th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 275% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. trades at $15.6, between stages. That is +28.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 93% of a 52-week range of $7 to $16. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is between stages. At $15.6 it trades +28.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 93% of its 52-week range ($7–$16).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +130% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. trades at 25.6× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (39th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 33.0×, measured across 1.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 25.6× is mid-range by its own standards (39th percentile), against a long-run median of 33.0× measured over 1.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −20.8% against a +130.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +8.3% | — | — | — |
| Profit | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| EPS | −20.8% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | +130.4% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
58.4/100 — rank 6 of 23 in Marine Shipping · 58% evidence confidence
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. scores 58.4 out of 100 against the 23 companies it is compared with in Marine Shipping, ranking 6. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 15.8 = 58.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported $0.0 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 2 years it has compounded at 80.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.1 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.1 B (+8.3% on the year), capping 2 years at 80.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.0 B, +50.0% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +20.8% growth against the decade's 80.3% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s operating margin is 66.7% in the Mar 26 quarter, +16.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 25.0% to 58.3%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 66.7%, +16.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 25.0%–58.3%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +16.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +50.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 33.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.01 B. 1 of the last 9 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (+0.0%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 275% of Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After null of capital spending, $0.1 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $0.1 B after null of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 275% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 2 years. Averaged over those years that is 384.6% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 2 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. earns a ROE of 13% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −2.0 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 15.4% net margin on 0.15× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 13%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 15.4% net margin × 0.15× asset turns × 5.38× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 12.4% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 5.8% − 7.8% = a −2.0 pp spread. The 7.8% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. carries total debt of $0.7 B against shareholder equity of $0.2 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 4.25. On the annual view that ratio went from 4.73 in FY24 to 4.31 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.7 B against shareholder equity of $0.2 B — a debt-to-equity of 4.25. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 4.73 (FY24) to 4.31 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
3.6% of Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.5 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 3.6% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.5 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.: the Z-score reads 0.88. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.88 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 0.88.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.ECO | 73.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence | TURNING | 31.3/35 Revenue 33.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 29.8 pp 83% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 8.6% · OPM 57.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 8.9× · PEG 0.84 65% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 25.6% · 1Y 142.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 31.3 + 17.6 + 11 + 13.7 = 73.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Safe Bulkers, Inc.SB | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 45% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 35.6% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 8.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 8.1% · RS bench 22.6% · 1Y 85%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 13.8 + 10.2 + 17.9 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.SHIP | 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 43.9 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 36.9% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 4.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 132.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 12.8 + 11.1 + 17 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Navios Maritime Partners L.P.NMM | 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 3.9% · OPM change 13.4 pp 83% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 38.3% 76% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 5.7× · PEG 0.71 65% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 76.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 13.1 + 12.7 + 13.4 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Danaos CorporationDAC | 59.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 10.9% · OPM change 1.8 pp 83% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 49.3% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 4× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 14.1/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 15.5% · 1Y 46.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 13.8 + 14 + 14.1 = 59.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Himalaya Shipping Ltd.this pageHSHP | 58.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 100% · OPM change 21.7 pp 62% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 51.2% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 10.3% · RS bench 23.8% · 1Y 117.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 15.8 = 58.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Ardmore Shipping CorporationASC | 57.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.4 pp 45% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 29.1% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 5.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.5% · 1Y 65.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 14.1 + 10.8 + 9.8 = 57.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Star Bulk Carriers Corp.SBLK | 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | TURNING | 15.7/35 Revenue -11.6% · PAT -37.5% · OPM change 22.9 pp 62% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 18× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 13.3/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench 13.8% · 1Y 49.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.1 + 12.2 + 13.3 = 55.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9SFL Corporation Ltd.SFL | 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue -16.4% · PAT -44.2% · OPM change 26.6 pp 62% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 32.3% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 45× · PEG 0.19 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 32.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 10.4 + 12 + 11.9 = 53.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Euroseas Ltd.ESEA | 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 10.3/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 2.3% · OPM change -10.6 pp 83% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 61.2% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.13 65% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench 10.6% · 1Y 55.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 16.2 + 15.7 + 8.8 = 51 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 11Matson, Inc.MATX | 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.1/35 Revenue -4.6% · PAT -16% · OPM change -2.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 12× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 15.6% · RS bench 30% · 1Y 98.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 9 + 11.2 + 19.6 = 50.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 12StealthGas Inc.GASS | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.2/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT 78.1% · OPM change 2.4 pp 83% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 32.4% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 5.5× · PEG 0.12 65% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -4.3% · 1Y 28.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 9.9 + 15.2 + 3.9 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Global Ship Lease, Inc.GSL | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.6/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 0.5% · OPM change -18.1 pp 83% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 49.2% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y 45.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 14.8 + 15.2 + 7.6 = 49.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 14Diana Shipping Inc.DSX | 48.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 15.4/20 P/E 7.1× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 60.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 8.4 + 15.4 + 7.2 = 48 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Genco Shipping & Trading LimitedGNK | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -62.2% · OPM change 25.3 pp 62% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.3/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 59.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 10.3 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Kirby CorporationKEX | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 32.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 12.3 + 9.2 + 4.5 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Costamare Inc.CMRE | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 46.1% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 5.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y 43.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 14 + 10.9 + 3 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Hafnia LimitedHAFN | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.9/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -26.1% · OPM change 12.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 26.5% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 35.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 13.8 + 10.1 + 2.3 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.PANL | 41.1/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.9/35 Revenue 22.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.7 pp 62% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG 1.68 65% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -14.9% · RS bench -3.1% · 1Y 51.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 7 + 7.6 + 4.6 = 41.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.CCEC | 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -13 pp 45% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 44.6% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -4.9% · 1Y -5.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 11 + 9.8 + 3.4 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.SMHI | 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 10.3/35 Revenue -18.2% · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -14.4% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 20.8% · 1Y 47.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 3 + 8.9 + 14.9 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.ZIM | 30.2/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 3.5/35 Revenue -29.1% · PAT -95.8% · OPM change -24.4 pp 83% evidence | 4.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 32.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 76.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.5 + 4.3 + 8.8 + 13.6 = 30.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 23Costamare Bulkers Holdings LimitedCMDB | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.6 pp 26% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 9.3% · 1Y 107.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 6.7 + 10 + 8.3 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s stock price today?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. trades at $15.6, +130.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $1.0 B. The stock sits at 93% of its 52-week range of $7–$16, +28.9% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s latest quarterly results?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported revenue of $0.0 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $0.11. The operating margin was 66.7%, 16.7 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s revenue?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported revenue of $0.0 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.1 B (+8.3%). Over the last 2 years revenue compounded at 80.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s profit?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran 66.7% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s market cap?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s market capitalisation is $1.0 B at a stock price of $15.6. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s P/E ratio?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. trades at a P/E of 25.6×, at the 39th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 33.0×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Himalaya Shipping Ltd. pay a dividend?
No — Himalaya Shipping Ltd. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 9 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Himalaya Shipping Ltd. overvalued?
On its own history, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 25.6× sits at the 39th percentile of its 1-year range (long-run median 33.0×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Himalaya Shipping Ltd. performing?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Himalaya Shipping Ltd. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Himalaya Shipping Ltd. is currently behind the S&P 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +130% against the S&P 500's +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $15.6. Its P/E of 25.6× sits at the 39th percentile of its own 1-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Himalaya Shipping Ltd.?
Somewhat — short interest is 3.6% of Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s tradable float, about 3.5 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Himalaya Shipping Ltd. have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s debt-to-equity is 4.39. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s capex?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 2 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY24 alone that was $0.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s cash flow?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.1 B of free cash flow after null of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 275% of Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Himalaya Shipping Ltd.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 0.88 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Himalaya Shipping Ltd. in its business cycle?
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s FY25 operating margin was 53.8%, against a 3-year band of 25.0%–58.3%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 66.7%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Himalaya Shipping Ltd. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +130.4% in a year while annual EPS moved −20.8% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Himalaya Shipping Ltd. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.