Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Marine Shipping Stocks

Marine Shipping: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. owns the largest revenue base; Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Marine Shipping moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 14% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 20% on average over the last four reported quarters.

BASING · +2 joined~Moving with the index4 of 23 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 21/23 >200d (+1) · 4/23 lead (+2) · EPS 11/22↑

20050020262025202420232022 576348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100108Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 17 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 83, against 100 at the start · down 20.2% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 64, against 100 at the start · down 35.9% on a year ago · 17 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 53.0% on a year ago · 17 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 41, against 100 at the start · down 42.8% on a year ago · 17 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 42, against 100 at the start · down 36.9% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · down 18.5% on a year ago · 17 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 55, against 100 at the start · up 4.3% on a year ago · 17 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · up 14.5% on a year ago · 18 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 5.4% on a year ago · 18 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 33, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 18 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 28, against 100 at the start · down 32.0% on a year ago · 18 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 46, against 100 at the start · down 20.3% on a year ago · 18 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 3.7% on a year ago · 18 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two43 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20050020262025202420232022 576348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100108Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 16 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 97, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 17 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 83, against 100 at the start · down 20.2% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 64, against 100 at the start · down 35.9% on a year ago · 17 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 53.0% on a year ago · 17 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 41, against 100 at the start · down 42.8% on a year ago · 17 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 42, against 100 at the start · down 36.9% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · down 18.5% on a year ago · 17 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 55, against 100 at the start · up 4.3% on a year ago · 17 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · up 14.5% on a year ago · 18 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 5.4% on a year ago · 18 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 33, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 18 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 28, against 100 at the start · down 32.0% on a year ago · 18 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 46, against 100 at the start · down 20.3% on a year ago · 18 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · down 3.7% on a year ago · 18 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two43No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Marine Shipping, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 23 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Marine Shipping outperforming S&P 500?

Marine Shipping has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 3%. 17 of 23 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is the strongest against the sector itself at +18.1%.

-3.0%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+38.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
17/23Stocks leading S&P 500
10/23Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Marine Shipping has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.7% over 52 weeks and 3% over 13 weeks. 17 of 23 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 23 beat the sector itself. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. leads with revenue of $6,295 million, based on 17 of 23 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
23
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$43.3B
Kirby Corporation
Revenue growing
9/16
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
17/23
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 23
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 81.1% evidence confidence.
Euroseas Ltd. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.ECO 73.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence TURNING 31.3/35 Revenue 33.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 29.8 pp 83% evidence 17.6/25 ROCE 8.6% · OPM 57.6% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 8.9× · PEG 0.84 65% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 25.6% · 1Y 142.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 31.3 + 17.6 + 11 + 13.7 = 73.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Safe Bulkers, Inc.SB 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 45% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 35.6% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 8.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.9/20 RS sector 8.1% · RS bench 22.6% · 1Y 85%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 13.8 + 10.2 + 17.9 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.SHIP 64.0/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 23.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 43.9 pp 45% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 36.9% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 4.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 32.7% · 1Y 132.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 12.8 + 11.1 + 17 = 64 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Navios Maritime Partners L.P.NMM 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 20.5/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT 3.9% · OPM change 13.4 pp 83% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 38.3% 76% evidence 12.7/20 P/E 5.7× · PEG 0.71 65% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 76.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 13.1 + 12.7 + 13.4 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Danaos CorporationDAC 59.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 17.6/35 Revenue 3% · PAT 10.9% · OPM change 1.8 pp 83% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 49.3% 76% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 4× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence 14.1/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench 15.5% · 1Y 46.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 13.8 + 14 + 14.1 = 59.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Himalaya Shipping Ltd.HSHP 58.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 21.7/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 100% · OPM change 21.7 pp 62% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 51.2% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 21.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 10.3% · RS bench 23.8% · 1Y 117.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 15.8 = 58.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Ardmore Shipping CorporationASC 57.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 22.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.4 pp 45% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 29.1% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 5.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.5% · 1Y 65.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.6 + 14.1 + 10.8 + 9.8 = 57.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Star Bulk Carriers Corp.SBLK 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence TURNING 15.7/35 Revenue -11.6% · PAT -37.5% · OPM change 22.9 pp 62% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 18× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence 13.3/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench 13.8% · 1Y 49.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.7 + 14.1 + 12.2 + 13.3 = 55.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
9SFL Corporation Ltd.SFL 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 18.8/35 Revenue -16.4% · PAT -44.2% · OPM change 26.6 pp 62% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 32.3% 76% evidence 12.0/20 P/E 45× · PEG 0.19 65% evidence 11.9/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 32.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 10.4 + 12 + 11.9 = 53.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Euroseas Ltd.ESEA 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence TURNING 10.3/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 2.3% · OPM change -10.6 pp 83% evidence 16.2/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 61.2% 76% evidence 15.7/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.13 65% evidence 8.8/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench 10.6% · 1Y 55.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 16.2 + 15.7 + 8.8 = 51 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11Matson, Inc.MATX 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 11.1/35 Revenue -4.6% · PAT -16% · OPM change -2.4 pp 83% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 8.1% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 12× · PEG 0.81 65% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 15.6% · RS bench 30% · 1Y 98.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 9 + 11.2 + 19.6 = 50.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
12StealthGas Inc.GASS 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 20.2/35 Revenue 4.2% · PAT 78.1% · OPM change 2.4 pp 83% evidence 9.9/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 32.4% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 5.5× · PEG 0.12 65% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -4.3% · 1Y 28.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 9.9 + 15.2 + 3.9 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Global Ship Lease, Inc.GSL 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 11.6/35 Revenue 7.2% · PAT 0.5% · OPM change -18.1 pp 83% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 49.2% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 3.5× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y 45.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.6 + 14.8 + 15.2 + 7.6 = 49.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
14Diana Shipping Inc.DSX 48.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence 8.4/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence 15.4/20 P/E 7.1× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 60.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 8.4 + 15.4 + 7.2 = 48 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Genco Shipping & Trading LimitedGNK 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.7/35 Revenue 2.4% · PAT -62.2% · OPM change 25.3 pp 62% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 59.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 59.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 10.3 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Kirby CorporationKEX 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.6 pp 45% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 32.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 12.3 + 9.2 + 4.5 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Costamare Inc.CMRE 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.1 pp 45% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 46.1% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 5.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -8.4% · 1Y 43.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 14 + 10.9 + 3 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Hafnia LimitedHAFN 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 16.9/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -26.1% · OPM change 12.9 pp 83% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 5.8% · OPM 26.5% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.3/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 35.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 13.8 + 10.1 + 2.3 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.PANL 41.1/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 21.9/35 Revenue 22.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.7 pp 62% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence 7.6/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG 1.68 65% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -14.9% · RS bench -3.1% · 1Y 51.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 7 + 7.6 + 4.6 = 41.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.CCEC 37.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence BREAKING OUT 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -13 pp 45% evidence 11.0/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 44.6% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -4.9% · 1Y -5.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 11 + 9.8 + 3.4 = 37.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.SMHI 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 10.3/35 Revenue -18.2% · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 62% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -14.4% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.9/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 20.8% · 1Y 47.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 3 + 8.9 + 14.9 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.ZIM 30.2/100Adverse evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 3.5/35 Revenue -29.1% · PAT -95.8% · OPM change -24.4 pp 83% evidence 4.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.3% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 32.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.6/20 RS sector 1.7% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 76.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 3.5 + 4.3 + 8.8 + 13.6 = 30.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 14.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
23Costamare Bulkers Holdings LimitedCMDB 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence ASLEEP 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.6 pp 26% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -4.1% · RS bench 9.3% · 1Y 107.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 6.7 + 10 + 8.3 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 23 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Marine Shipping at +142.3%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +32.7%. 17 of 23 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has the highest Revenue among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at $6,295 million. Matson, Inc. is next at $3,321 million. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at 33.1%, so level and change sit with different companies. 17 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is the scale leader at $6,295 million, 89.6% ahead of Matson, Inc.. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s growth is 33.1% from a $482 million base, with 17 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · $6,295 million
Gap89.6% versus #2 · Matson, Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage17/23 companies · 412 observations

Investor read: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is the scale benchmark; Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s growth falls below Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM$6.3B
2Matson, Inc. MATX$3.3B
3Hafnia Limited HAFN$2.4B
4Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM$1.4B
5Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK$1.1B
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO33%
2Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL23%
3Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP18%
4Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL7.2%
5Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM5.9%
Revenue · company comparison
17/23 level · 16/23 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM$1.4B-30%Mar 2026
Kirby Corporation KEX$844M7.4%Jun 2026
Matson, Inc. MATX$758M-3.1%Mar 2026
Hafnia Limited HAFN$689M24%Mar 2026
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM$357M17%Mar 2026
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK$281M22%Mar 2026
Danaos Corporation DAC$254M0.4%Mar 2026
Costamare Inc. CMRE$211M-5.4%Jun 2026
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL$198M3.7%Mar 2026
SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL$174M-7.0%Mar 2026
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL$171M39%Mar 2026
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO$170M113%Mar 2026
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK$114M61%Mar 2026
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited CMDB$112M—Mar 2026
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. CCEC$98M-3.9%Jun 2026
Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC$88M19%Jun 2026
Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB$74M16%Jun 2026
Euroseas Ltd. ESEA$56M0.0%Mar 2026
Diana Shipping Inc. DSX$55M0.0%Mar 2026
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. SMHI$44M-20%Mar 2026
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP$43M79%Jun 2026
StealthGas Inc. GASS$43M2.4%Mar 2026
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP$34M55%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

$43M
$64M
$73M
$74M
$72M
$80M
$81M
$89M
$64M
$64M
$76M
$98M
$106M
$86M
$102M
$104M
$100M
$98M
$98M
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

$216M
$284M
$268M
$291M
$289M
$265M
$249M
$367M
$400M
$495M
$475M
$515M
$545M
$548M
$223M
$218M
$225M
$212M
$211M
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

$196M
$215M
$230M
$251M
$260M
$252M
$244M
$241M
$239M
$249M
$253M
$246M
$256M
$258M
$253M
$262M
$261M
$266M
$254M
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

$139M
$154M
$154M
$154M
$173M
$165M
$159M
$162M
$175M
$179M
$180M
$175M
$174M
$182M
$191M
$192M
$193M
$191M
$198M
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

$197M
$251M
$273M
$476M
$534M
$607M
$628M
$711M
$666M
$712M
$795M
$842M
$728M
$540M
$557M
$562M
$594M
$600M
$689M
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

$599M
$591M
$611M
$698M
$746M
$730M
$750M
$777M
$765M
$799M
$808M
$824M
$831M
$802M
$786M
$855M
$871M
$852M
$844M
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.1B
$802M
$705M
$773M
$828M
$789M
$722M
$847M
$962M
$890M
$782M
$831M
$880M
$852M
$758M
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

$228M
$268M
$237M
$281M
$322M
$371M
$310M
$347M
$323M
$327M
$319M
$342M
$341M
$333M
$304M
$328M
$347M
$366M
$357M
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
$42M
$50M
$69M
$110M
$113M
$120M
$89M
$92M
$111M
$112M
$85M
$85M
$80M
$94M
$91M
$127M
$170M
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

$135M
$152M
$152M
$153M
$167M
$198M
$173M
$165M
$205M
$210M
$229M
$191M
$255M
$229M
$187M
$193M
$178M
$176M
$174M
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

$416M
$500M
$361M
$417M
$364M
$295M
$224M
$239M
$223M
$263M
$259M
$353M
$344M
$309M
$231M
$247M
$264M
$301M
$281M
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

$3.1B
$3.5B
$3.7B
$3.4B
$3.2B
$2.2B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.6B
$1.9B
$2.8B
$2.2B
$2.0B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.5B
$1.4B
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 22 companies with a series here. The remaining 10 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

—
—
—
85%
67%
25%
11%
20%
-11%
-20%
-6.2%
10%
66%
34%
34%
6.1%
-5.7%
14%
-3.9%
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

—
—
—
74%
34%
-6.7%
-7.1%
26%
38%
87%
91%
40%
36%
11%
-53%
-58%
-59%
-61%
-5.4%
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

—
—
—
72%
33%
17%
6.1%
-4.0%
-8.1%
-1.2%
3.7%
2.1%
7.1%
3.6%
0.0%
6.5%
2.0%
3.1%
0.4%
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

—
—
—
86%
24%
7.1%
3.3%
5.2%
1.2%
8.5%
13%
8.0%
-0.6%
1.7%
6.1%
9.7%
11%
5.0%
3.7%
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

—
—
—
134%
171%
142%
130%
49%
25%
17%
27%
18%
9.3%
-24%
-30%
-33%
-18%
11%
24%
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
25%
25%
24%
23%
11%
2.6%
9.5%
7.7%
6.1%
8.6%
0.4%
-2.7%
3.8%
4.8%
6.2%
7.4%
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

—
—
—
44%
4.0%
-37%
-40%
-39%
-26%
-1.6%
2.4%
9.6%
16%
13%
8.3%
-1.9%
-8.5%
-4.3%
-3.1%
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

—
—
—
85%
41%
38%
31%
23%
0.3%
-12%
2.9%
-1.4%
5.6%
1.8%
-4.7%
-4.1%
1.8%
9.9%
17%
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
—
—
169%
140%
29%
-16%
-1.8%
-6.7%
-4.5%
-7.6%
-28%
-16%
7.1%
49%
113%
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
—
—
31%
24%
30%
14%
7.8%
23%
6.1%
32%
16%
24%
9.1%
-18%
1.1%
-30%
-23%
-7.0%
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

—
—
—
34%
-13%
-41%
-38%
-43%
-39%
-11%
16%
48%
54%
17%
-11%
-30%
-23%
-2.6%
22%
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

—
—
—
44%
2.9%
-37%
-63%
-62%
-61%
-45%
14%
48%
117%
80%
28%
-15%
-36%
-32%
-30%
—
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Euroseas Ltd. has the highest OPM among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 61.2%. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is next at 57.6%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has the highest Margin change at +43.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 23 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Euroseas Ltd. leads opm at 61.2%; Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. leads margin change at +43.9 percentage points.

LeaderEuroseas Ltd. · 61.2%
Gap6.3% versus #2 · Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/23 companies · 412 observations

Investor read: Euroseas Ltd. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Euroseas Ltd. ESEA61%
2Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO58%
3Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP51%
4Danaos Corporation DAC49%
5Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL49%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP+43.9 pp
2Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO+29.8 pp
3SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL+26.6 pp
4Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK+25.3 pp
5Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK+22.9 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
23/23 level · 23/23 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Euroseas Ltd. ESEA61%−10.6 ppMar 2026
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO58%+29.8 ppMar 2026
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP51%+21.7 ppMar 2026
Danaos Corporation DAC49%+1.8 ppMar 2026
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL49%−18.1 ppMar 2026
Costamare Inc. CMRE46%−9.1 ppJun 2026
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. CCEC45%−13.0 ppJun 2026
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM38%+13.4 ppMar 2026
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP37%+43.9 ppJun 2026
Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB36%+12.4 ppJun 2026
StealthGas Inc. GASS32%+2.4 ppMar 2026
SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL32%+26.6 ppMar 2026
Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC29%+19.4 ppJun 2026
Hafnia Limited HAFN27%+12.9 ppMar 2026
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK26%+22.9 ppMar 2026
Diana Shipping Inc. DSX21%−4.2 ppMar 2026
Kirby Corporation KEX13%−0.6 ppJun 2026
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited CMDB12%−3.6 ppMar 2026
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK12%+25.3 ppMar 2026
Matson, Inc. MATX8.1%−2.4 ppMar 2026
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL6.1%+3.7 ppMar 2026
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM-1.3%−24.4 ppMar 2026
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. SMHI-14%−4.9 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

35%
78%
45%
45%
44%
47%
44%
34%
48%
42%
47%
66%
54%
95%
58%
54%
50%
54%
45%
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

57%
64%
55%
52%
51%
82%
62%
33%
21%
22%
22%
25%
19%
23%
55%
53%
52%
48%
46%
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

57%
54%
61%
63%
64%
75%
63%
61%
61%
53%
55%
57%
52%
49%
48%
48%
50%
46%
49%
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

0.0%
54%
55%
54%
59%
52%
53%
53%
54%
0.0%
54%
54%
0.0%
0.0%
67%
53%
0.0%
55%
49%
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

-4.0%
2.5%
13%
43%
56%
46%
45%
32%
25%
25%
29%
31%
30%
17%
14%
15%
17%
18%
27%
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

-53%
5.3%
4.9%
6.7%
7.9%
7.9%
8.2%
11%
12%
12%
13%
15%
15%
6.3%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

35%
38%
37%
39%
30%
12%
5.5%
13%
16%
9.5%
5.1%
15%
25%
17%
11%
14%
18%
17%
8.1%
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

77%
52%
42%
48%
89%
42%
45%
42%
38%
34%
32%
38%
37%
38%
25%
32%
26%
41%
38%
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
19%
29%
40%
54%
57%
56%
40%
37%
50%
48%
32%
31%
28%
39%
38%
54%
58%
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

40%
68%
39%
50%
39%
38%
29%
32%
32%
35%
37%
33%
37%
28%
5.7%
24%
27%
18%
32%
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

56%
64%
52%
50%
33%
31%
16%
23%
31%
25%
35%
32%
26%
16%
2.8%
8.0%
14%
27%
26%
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

59%
61%
60%
52%
48%
27%
-1.0%
-13%
-179%
-4.4%
11%
24%
45%
30%
23%
9.1%
15%
9.6%
-1.3%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

—
—
—
−54.6 pp
+8.3 pp
−30.2 pp
−0.9 pp
−10.9 pp
+4.1 pp
−5.8 pp
+2.3 pp
+32.3 pp
+6.1 pp
+53.5 pp
+11.0 pp
−11.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−40.6 pp
−13.0 pp
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

—
—
—
+2.7 pp
−6.4 pp
+17.7 pp
+7.3 pp
−18.6 pp
−29.5 pp
−60.5 pp
−40.6 pp
−8.6 pp
−1.9 pp
+1.7 pp
+33.5 pp
+27.8 pp
+33.2 pp
+24.3 pp
−9.1 pp
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

—
—
—
+12.8 pp
+6.6 pp
+21.6 pp
+2.5 pp
−1.4 pp
−2.6 pp
−22.5 pp
−8.0 pp
−4.3 pp
−9.6 pp
−4.3 pp
−7.9 pp
−8.9 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.4 pp
+1.8 pp
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

—
—
—
−0.7 pp
+59.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.6 pp
−5.1 pp
−51.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.1 pp
−53.9 pp
0.0 pp
+13.2 pp
−0.6 pp
0.0 pp
+55.3 pp
−18.1 pp
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

—
—
—
+43.9 pp
+59.8 pp
+43.8 pp
+31.3 pp
−11.1 pp
−30.7 pp
−21.0 pp
−15.4 pp
−1.2 pp
+5.0 pp
−8.3 pp
−15.7 pp
−16.3 pp
−13.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+12.9 pp
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
+2.4 pp
+60.8 pp
+2.6 pp
+3.3 pp
+4.5 pp
+4.3 pp
+3.7 pp
+4.4 pp
+3.4 pp
+3.1 pp
−5.3 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.5 pp
+8.9 pp
−0.6 pp
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

—
—
—
+14.7 pp
−5.2 pp
−25.9 pp
−31.6 pp
−26.6 pp
−14.1 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+2.2 pp
+9.2 pp
+7.1 pp
+5.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−6.9 pp
+0.3 pp
−2.4 pp
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

—
—
—
−24.6 pp
+11.4 pp
−10.5 pp
+2.7 pp
−5.7 pp
−51.3 pp
−7.6 pp
−12.7 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.0 pp
+4.3 pp
−7.4 pp
−6.9 pp
−10.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+13.4 pp
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
—
—
+38.0 pp
+26.8 pp
−0.4 pp
−17.1 pp
−7.6 pp
−8.3 pp
−7.5 pp
−5.6 pp
−21.8 pp
−8.6 pp
+6.0 pp
+22.7 pp
+29.8 pp
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
—
—
+12.8 pp
−1.2 pp
−30.0 pp
−10.1 pp
−18.3 pp
−7.3 pp
−2.8 pp
+8.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+5.0 pp
−6.5 pp
−31.6 pp
−9.0 pp
−9.6 pp
−10.2 pp
+26.6 pp
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

—
—
—
+3.8 pp
−22.8 pp
−33.0 pp
−36.4 pp
−27.4 pp
−2.1 pp
−6.0 pp
+19.7 pp
+8.7 pp
−5.1 pp
−9.4 pp
−32.5 pp
−23.6 pp
−12.0 pp
+11.2 pp
+22.9 pp
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

—
—
—
+2.9 pp
−11.5 pp
−34.4 pp
−61.3 pp
−64.3 pp
−226.6 pp
−31.1 pp
+11.7 pp
+37.0 pp
+223.5 pp
+34.7 pp
+12.4 pp
−15.1 pp
−30.1 pp
−20.7 pp
−24.4 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Danaos Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at $520 million. Hafnia Limited is next at $457 million. Diana Shipping Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Danaos Corporation leads with $520 million of TTM profit, 13.8% above Hafnia Limited. Diana Shipping Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (214.3% uncapped) growth from a $44 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderDanaos Corporation · $520 million
Gap13.8% versus #2 · Hafnia Limited
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage17/23 companies · 414 observations

Investor read: Danaos Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Danaos Corporation DAC$520M
2Hafnia Limited HAFN$457M
3Matson, Inc. MATX$430M
4Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL$387M
5Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM$349M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Diana Shipping Inc. DSX100%
2Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO100%
3StealthGas Inc. GASS78%
4Danaos Corporation DAC11%
5Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM3.9%
Net profit · company comparison
17/23 level · 10/23 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Hafnia Limited HAFN$180M186%Mar 2026
Danaos Corporation DAC$140M22%Mar 2026
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM$106M152%Mar 2026
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL$94M-24%Mar 2026
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO$88M577%Mar 2026
Costamare Inc. CMRE$82M-19%Jun 2026
Kirby Corporation KEX$81M6.6%Jun 2026
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK$59M55%Mar 2026
Matson, Inc. MATX$57M-21%Mar 2026
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. CCEC$44M-25%Jun 2026
Euroseas Ltd. ESEA$33M-11%Mar 2026
Diana Shipping Inc. DSX$29M867%Mar 2026
SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL$25M-125%Mar 2026
Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC$24M300%Jun 2026
Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB$22M214%Jun 2026
StealthGas Inc. GASS$15M67%Mar 2026
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL$14M33%Mar 2026
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK$10M25%Mar 2026
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited CMDB$10M-189%Mar 2026
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP$10M71%Jun 2026
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP$5M1,300%Mar 2026
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. SMHI$-16M-660%Mar 2026
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM$-86M-129%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

$15M
$49M
$33M
$33M
$79M
$38M
$36M
$30M
$31M
$27M
$35M
$42M
$57M
$48M
$59M
$57M
$50M
$54M
$44M
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

$115M
$161M
$123M
$122M
$115M
$194M
$149M
$67M
$60M
$105M
$103M
$103M
$79M
$32M
$101M
$90M
$99M
$79M
$82M
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

$217M
$166M
$331M
$8M
$67M
$153M
$146M
$147M
$133M
$150M
$150M
$141M
$123M
$90M
$115M
$131M
$131M
$118M
$140M
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

$65M
$68M
$70M
$56M
$92M
$75M
$75M
$78M
$85M
$67M
$92M
$88M
$81M
$93M
$123M
$95M
$95M
$103M
$94M
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

$-21M
$-8M
$21M
$186M
$280M
$264M
$257M
$213M
$147M
$176M
$220M
$259M
$216M
$80M
$63M
$75M
$92M
$110M
$180M
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

$-265M
$11M
$18M
$29M
$39M
$37M
$41M
$57M
$63M
$62M
$70M
$84M
$90M
$43M
$76M
$94M
$93M
$92M
$81M
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

$283M
$395M
$339M
$381M
$266M
$78M
$34M
$81M
$120M
$62M
$36M
$113M
$199M
$128M
$72M
$95M
$135M
$143M
$57M
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

$158M
$116M
$86M
$118M
$257M
$118M
$99M
$112M
$90M
$132M
$73M
$101M
$98M
$95M
$42M
$70M
$56M
$117M
$106M
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
$9M
$8M
$19M
$48M
$52M
$53M
$19M
$21M
$42M
$40M
$15M
$13M
$13M
$27M
$24M
$59M
$88M
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

$32M
$81M
$46M
$57M
$49M
$51M
$6M
$16M
$29M
$31M
$45M
$20M
$44M
$20M
$-32M
$1M
$8M
$-5M
$25M
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

$220M
$300M
$170M
$200M
$110M
$86M
$46M
$44M
$44M
$40M
$75M
$106M
$81M
$42M
$0M
$0M
$19M
$65M
$59M
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$417M
$-58M
$-213M
$-2.3B
$-147M
$92M
$373M
$1.1B
$563M
$296M
$24M
$123M
$38M
$-86M
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

—
—
—
-18%
427%
-22%
9.1%
-9.1%
-61%
-29%
-2.8%
40%
84%
78%
69%
36%
-12%
13%
-25%
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

—
—
—
34%
0.0%
21%
21%
-45%
-48%
-46%
-31%
54%
32%
-70%
-1.9%
-13%
25%
147%
-19%
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

—
—
—
-98%
-69%
-7.8%
-56%
1,738%
99%
-2.0%
2.7%
-4.1%
-7.5%
-40%
-23%
-7.1%
6.5%
31%
22%
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

—
—
—
75%
42%
10%
7.1%
39%
-7.6%
-11%
23%
13%
-4.7%
39%
34%
8.0%
17%
11%
-24%
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

—
—
—
—
—
—
1,124%
15%
-48%
-33%
-14%
22%
47%
-55%
-71%
-71%
-57%
38%
186%
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
190%
—
236%
128%
97%
62%
68%
71%
47%
43%
-31%
8.6%
12%
3.3%
114%
6.6%
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

—
—
—
134%
-6.0%
-80%
-90%
-79%
-55%
-21%
5.9%
40%
66%
106%
100%
-16%
-32%
12%
-21%
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

—
—
—
18%
63%
1.7%
15%
-5.1%
-65%
12%
-26%
-9.8%
8.9%
-28%
-42%
-31%
-43%
23%
152%
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
—
—
478%
563%
0.0%
-56%
-19%
-25%
-21%
-38%
-69%
-33%
60%
354%
577%
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
—
—
200%
53%
-37%
-87%
-72%
-41%
-39%
650%
25%
52%
-35%
-171%
-95%
-82%
-125%
—
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

—
—
—
61%
-50%
-71%
-73%
-78%
-60%
-53%
63%
141%
84%
5.0%
-100%
-100%
-77%
55%
—
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

—
—
—
50%
-20%
-76%
-103%
-116%
-295%
-135%
—
—
—
—
222%
-94%
-89%
-93%
-129%
—
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the highest ROCE among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 8.6%. Ardmore Shipping Corporation is next at 7.1%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +6.4 percentage points. 23 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. leads ROCE at 8.6%, 1.5 percentage points above Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the strongest latest improvement at +6.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderOkeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · 8.6%
Gap21.1% versus #2 · Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/23 companies · 421 observations

Investor read: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO8.6%
2Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC7.1%
3Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK6.3%
4Hafnia Limited HAFN5.8%
5Euroseas Ltd. ESEA5.4%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO+6.4 pp
2Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC+3.9 pp
3Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP+3.6 pp
4Hafnia Limited HAFN+3.4 pp
5Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB+2.4 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
23/23 level · 23/23 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO8.6%+6.4 ppMar 2026
Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC7.1%+3.9 ppJun 2026
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK6.3%−0.8 ppMar 2026
Hafnia Limited HAFN5.8%+3.4 ppMar 2026
Euroseas Ltd. ESEA5.4%−2.8 ppMar 2026
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP5.3%+3.6 ppJun 2026
Kirby Corporation KEX4.5%+2.0 ppJun 2026
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL4.0%−2.1 ppMar 2026
Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB3.2%+2.4 ppJun 2026
Costamare Inc. CMRE2.8%−0.1 ppJun 2026
Danaos Corporation DAC2.7%−0.3 ppMar 2026
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM2.5%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP2.1%+0.6 ppMar 2026
StealthGas Inc. GASS2.0%+0.2 ppMar 2026
SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL1.9%+1.5 ppMar 2026
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited CMDB1.7%+1.7 ppMar 2026
Matson, Inc. MATX1.5%−0.6 ppMar 2026
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. CCEC1.3%−1.3 ppJun 2026
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL1.3%+0.9 ppMar 2026
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK1.2%+2.1 ppMar 2026
Diana Shipping Inc. DSX1.0%−0.2 ppMar 2026
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM-0.2%−6.4 ppMar 2026
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. SMHI-1.1%−0.3 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

1.7%
3.9%
2.6%
2.7%
2.2%
2.1%
1.8%
1.5%
1.5%
1.1%
1.3%
2.1%
1.9%
2.4%
1.7%
2.6%
1.3%
1.4%
1.1%
1.3%

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

3.7%
5.3%
4.0%
3.8%
3.6%
5.1%
3.6%
2.7%
1.9%
2.3%
2.2%
2.8%
2.3%
2.8%
2.7%
2.9%
2.9%
2.6%
2.5%
2.8%

Danaos Corporation · DAC

4.0%
4.0%
4.2%
4.9%
5.0%
5.9%
4.5%
4.4%
4.3%
4.0%
4.1%
3.9%
3.5%
3.3%
3.0%
3.0%
3.1%
2.8%
2.7%
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

0.0%
5.6%
5.5%
5.3%
5.8%
4.7%
4.7%
4.6%
5.0%
0.0%
5.2%
4.9%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
4.7%
0.0%
4.5%
4.0%
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

-0.3%
0.3%
1.4%
7.3%
10%
9.9%
8.7%
6.7%
5.0%
5.4%
6.9%
7.9%
6.7%
2.9%
2.4%
2.7%
3.2%
3.5%
5.8%
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

-6.1%
0.6%
0.6%
0.9%
1.2%
1.2%
1.3%
1.8%
1.9%
1.9%
2.0%
2.4%
2.5%
1.0%
2.0%
2.5%
2.4%
2.5%
2.0%
4.5%

Matson, Inc. · MATX

15%
17%
15%
16%
10%
2.7%
1.1%
2.7%
3.5%
2.0%
1.0%
3.4%
6.4%
3.8%
2.1%
3.0%
4.1%
3.5%
1.5%
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

8.3%
6.7%
3.7%
4.8%
7.8%
4.1%
3.7%
3.7%
2.8%
2.5%
2.3%
2.9%
2.6%
2.6%
1.5%
2.0%
1.7%
2.8%
2.5%
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

0.0%
0.0%
—
—
2.8%
6.0%
12%
13%
3.3%
3.2%
5.1%
5.1%
2.7%
2.6%
2.2%
3.6%
3.4%
6.7%
8.6%
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

1.8%
3.7%
2.1%
2.8%
2.3%
2.5%
1.6%
1.7%
2.4%
2.6%
3.0%
2.1%
3.0%
2.1%
0.4%
1.6%
1.5%
1.0%
1.9%
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

14%
22%
26%
29%
25%
19%
15%
10%
8.8%
8.4%
10%
9.0%
9.6%
9.2%
7.1%
4.7%
3.3%
4.2%
6.3%
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

58%
48%
45%
30%
22%
7.3%
-0.2%
-2.0%
-31%
-0.7%
2.3%
6.1%
18%
9.0%
6.2%
1.9%
3.0%
1.6%
-0.2%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 23 companies with a series here. The remaining 11 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.3 pp

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

—
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp

Danaos Corporation · DAC

—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

—
—
—
—
+5.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.8 pp
−4.7 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−5.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+4.5 pp
−2.1 pp
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

—
—
—
—
+10.7 pp
+9.6 pp
+7.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−5.4 pp
−4.5 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.7 pp
−2.5 pp
−4.5 pp
−5.2 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+3.4 pp
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
—
+7.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.5 pp
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp

Matson, Inc. · MATX

—
—
—
—
−4.7 pp
−14.7 pp
−13.9 pp
−13.7 pp
−6.8 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.9 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−2.6 pp
0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
+2.8 pp
+6.0 pp
—
—
+0.5 pp
−2.8 pp
−6.8 pp
−7.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+4.1 pp
+6.4 pp
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.5 pp
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

—
—
—
—
+11.0 pp
−2.2 pp
−11.1 pp
−18.3 pp
−16.6 pp
−11.0 pp
−4.5 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
−3.3 pp
−4.3 pp
−6.3 pp
−5.0 pp
−0.8 pp
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

—
—
—
—
−36.2 pp
−41.0 pp
−44.8 pp
−31.6 pp
−52.2 pp
−8.0 pp
+2.5 pp
+8.1 pp
+48.4 pp
+9.7 pp
+3.9 pp
−4.2 pp
−14.7 pp
−7.4 pp
−6.4 pp
—
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Diana Shipping Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 0.1×. StealthGas Inc. is next at 0.12×. Euroseas Ltd. has the lowest P/E at 3.52×, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Diana Shipping Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.1×, 16.7% below StealthGas Inc.. Only 11 of 23 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderDiana Shipping Inc. · 0.1×
Gap16.7% versus #2 · StealthGas Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/23 companies · 61 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Diana Shipping Inc. DSX0.1
2StealthGas Inc. GASS0.1
3Euroseas Ltd. ESEA0.1
4Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL0.2
5SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL0.2
P/Elowest P/E
1Euroseas Ltd. ESEA3.5
2Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL3.6
3Danaos Corporation DAC4.0
4Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP4.7
5Costamare Inc. CMRE5.3
Valuation · company comparison
11/23 level · 22/23 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. PANL1.712.9Mar 2026
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ECO0.88.9Mar 2026
Matson, Inc. MATX0.812.1Mar 2026
Kirby Corporation KEX0.720.9Jun 2026
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. NMM0.75.7Mar 2026
Costamare Inc. CMRE0.65.3Jun 2026
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. CCEC0.611.5Jun 2026
Ardmore Shipping Corporation ASC0.35.4Jun 2026
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK0.218.0Mar 2026
Danaos Corporation DAC0.24.0Mar 2026
SFL Corporation Ltd. SFL0.245.0Mar 2026
Global Ship Lease, Inc. GSL0.23.6Mar 2026
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP0.24.7Jun 2026
Safe Bulkers, Inc. SB0.18.1Jun 2026
Euroseas Ltd. ESEA0.13.5Mar 2026
StealthGas Inc. GASS0.15.5Mar 2026
Diana Shipping Inc. DSX0.17.1Mar 2026
Hafnia Limited HAFN—8.4Mar 2026
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM—32.1Mar 2026
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited GNK—59.3Mar 2026
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. HSHP—21.1Mar 2026
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. SMHI—21.2Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 17 companies with a series here. The remaining 5 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Ardmore Shipping Corporation · ASC

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
0.3
—
—
—
—
—
—

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.1
0.3
—
0.6
—
—

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.6
—

Danaos Corporation · DAC

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
—
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.7
1.0
1.7
—
0.6
0.7
—

Matson, Inc. · MATX

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
—
—
0.1
0.8
—
—
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

—
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.8
—
—

Safe Bulkers, Inc. · SB

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.6
0.3
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 22 companies with a series here. The remaining 10 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. · CCEC

3.8
3.1
3.1
3.1
1.9
2.2
2.5
2.9
5.2
6.6
7.6
6.7
14.5
7.1
5.8
7.3
5.6
7.3
10.5
11.5

Costamare Inc. · CMRE

5.3
2.9
3.4
2.3
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.6
3.3
4.3
3.9
3.9
3.0
3.9
4.8
5.5
6.3
5.3

Danaos Corporation · DAC

1.8
1.5
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.9
3.0
2.6
2.3
2.6
2.5
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.5
4.0
—

Global Ship Lease, Inc. · GSL

7.9
5.0
5.0
2.6
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.4
2.3
3.2
3.0
2.3
2.2
2.5
2.8
3.1
3.6
—

Hafnia Limited · HAFN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.3
4.2
3.7
3.4
5.9
9.8
8.0
8.4
—

Kirby Corporation · KEX

—
—
—
—
38.2
31.7
28.8
26.5
25.1
21.1
22.5
25.4
23.5
21.6
20.0
21.4
15.5
17.4
20.4
20.9

Matson, Inc. · MATX

5.7
4.2
4.3
2.2
1.8
2.3
3.1
6.3
10.2
13.2
13.2
13.7
12.0
9.7
8.4
7.5
7.5
9.0
12.1
—

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. · NMM

1.8
1.1
2.1
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.7
2.0
3.2
4.0
4.8
3.6
3.6
3.8
5.2
5.5
5.7
—

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. · ECO

—
—
—
—
—
4.6
5.8
4.2
4.9
5.9
7.2
8.5
9.0
6.3
8.9
10.4
12.3
9.0
8.9
—

SFL Corporation Ltd. · SFL

—
6.3
7.2
5.6
5.0
6.0
7.5
9.8
14.1
17.1
13.6
13.9
10.4
10.1
20.0
32.0
—
—
45.0
—

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · SBLK

6.0
3.4
3.7
2.9
2.3
3.5
4.9
6.4
9.1
10.3
9.9
10.5
9.3
5.8
7.9
16.1
34.6
26.0
18.0
—

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. · ZIM

1.8
1.5
1.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.2
—
—
—
—
2.2
1.2
0.8
1.0
1.6
5.3
32.1
—
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Marine Shipping comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 23 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 23 Marine Shipping companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Marine Shipping company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Marine Shipping comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 23 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Marine Shipping sector outperforming S&P 500?

Marine Shipping has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.7% over 52 weeks and 3% over 13 weeks. 17 of 23 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 23 beat the sector itself.

Which Marine Shipping company is largest by revenue?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. leads with revenue of $6,295 million, based on 17 of 23 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Marine Shipping company is growing fastest?

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 33.1%, across 16 of 23 comparable companies.

Which Marine Shipping company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. ranks first at 73.6/100 with 81.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Marine Shipping company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Diana Shipping Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.1, among 11 of 23 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Marine Shipping comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Marine Shipping company is the biggest?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $6,295 million, ahead of Matson, Inc. at $3,321 million. That covers 17 of 23 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Marine Shipping company has the best profit margins?

Euroseas Ltd. has the highest operating margin at 61.2%, from 23 of 23 comparable companies. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +43.9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Marine Shipping company makes the most profit?

Danaos Corporation earns the most, at $520 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 17 of 23 comparable companies. Diana Shipping Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Marine Shipping company earns the highest return on capital?

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. leads on return on capital employed at 8.6%, across 23 of 23 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Marine Shipping stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Diana Shipping Inc. screens cheapest at 0.1×. Only 11 of 23 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Marine Shipping sector beating the market?

Marine Shipping has outperformed S&P 500 by 38.7% over the last 52 weeks and 3% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 17 of 23 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Marine Shipping stock has the strongest price momentum?

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Marine Shipping company scores highest for research priority?

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. scores 73.6 out of 100 with 81.1% evidence confidence, from 31.3 points on growth and earnings, 17.6 on capital efficiency, 11 on valuation and 13.7 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Marine Shipping companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 23 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Marine Shipping sector?

The 23 Marine Shipping companies on this page carry $43,324 million of combined market value. Kirby Corporation is the largest at $7,084 million, about 16% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Marine Shipping sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 23 Marine Shipping companies on this page is 8.9×, measured on the 22 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Marine Shipping sector performing?

17 of the 23 covered Marine Shipping companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 38.7% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Marine Shipping stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 23 listed Marine Shipping companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI