Marine Shipping Stocks in the US

The largest Marine Shipping stocks in the US by market value are Kirby Corporation ($6.8B), Matson, Inc. ($6.3B) and Hafnia ($5.0B), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

• Kirby Corporation: $128.12 | market value $6.8B | P/E 20.5
• Matson, Inc.: $211.44 | market value $6.3B | P/E 12.5
• Hafnia: $9.81 | market value $5.0B | P/E 5
• Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.: $84.90 | market value $3.5B | P/E 4.8
• ZIM Integrated Shipping Services: $28.41 | market value $3.4B | P/E 22.6
• Star Bulk Carriers Corp.: $27.20 | market value $3.2B | P/E 9.7
• Danaos Corporation: $152.45 | market value $2.8B | P/E 4.1
• Navios Maritime Partners L.P.: $85.58 | market value $2.5B | P/E 4.5
• SFL Corporation: $11.72 | market value $1.6B | P/E 21.2
• Costamare Inc.: $13.16 | market value $1.6B | P/E 5.3

The other 13 Marine Shipping companies are in the full list below.

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 4 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 4 Nov 2026.

The largest 15 of 23 listed US Marine Shipping companies are named here; all 23 are ranked in the scorecard. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large company cannot set the reading.

1. Kirby Corporation$6.8B
2. Matson, Inc.$6.3B
3. Hafnia Limited$5.0B
4. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.$3.5B
5. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.$3.4B
6. Star Bulk Carriers Corp.$3.2B
7. Danaos Corporation$2.8B
8. Navios Maritime Partners L.P.$2.5B
9. SFL Corporation Ltd.$1.6B
10. Costamare Inc.$1.6B
11. Global Ship Lease, Inc.$1.4B
12. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.$1.3B
13. Genco Shipping & Trading Limited$1.1B
14. Safe Bulkers, Inc.$839M
15. Ardmore Shipping Corporation$755M

The remaining 8 Marine Shipping companies are named and ranked in the scorecard.

23 Marine Shipping companies in the Marine Shipping industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 4 November 2026, and all 23 are listed below, largest first. The largest is Kirby Corporation ($6.8 billion) and the smallest with a market value is SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.

Download all 23 Marine Shipping companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 27% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 1% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 12 weeks running.

Price up, without the fundamentals confirming. 6 of 23 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months.

Ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view for 12 weeks running; 13 of the 23 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (8 fewer than four weeks earlier); 6 of those 23 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (11 fewer than four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 17 of the 22 that report earnings.

Participation is shrinking, 17 → 6 of 23 over four weeks, after being ahead of S&P 500. Price-only fade, 17 of 22 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago, so the fade is in the price, not in the earnings.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 23 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Marine Shipping has done better than the S&P 500 by 34.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 2.1%. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the strongest against the sector itself at +40.9%.

Marine Shipping has done better than the S&P 500 by 34.4% over 52 weeks and by 2.1% over 13 weeks. 12 of 23 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months), and 10 of 23 are ahead of the industry itself.

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.

Danaos Corporation scores well on valuation against its peers or its own history, but its earnings have not yet improved enough to back that up.

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Marine Shipping at +153.3%. It also leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at +45.1%. 12 of 23 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 4 November 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Marine Shipping itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against S&P 500

Strongest against the sector itself

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has the highest Revenue among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at $6,440 million. Kirby Corporation is next at $3,489 million. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is the largest at $6,440 million, 84.6% ahead of Kirby Corporation. Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s growth is capped at 100% on the scoring scale; the full change over the last 12 months is 105.5% from a $707 million base, with 20 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is the size to compare against; Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s growth falls below Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the highest OPM among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 75%. Himalaya Shipping Ltd. is next at 68.3%. The same company also has the highest Margin change, at +35.7 percentage points. 23 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. leads both opm at 75% and margin change at +35.7 percentage points.

What this means: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Hafnia Limited has the highest Net profit among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at $660 million. Danaos Corporation is next at $541 million. Ardmore Shipping Corporation has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Hafnia Limited earns the most, $660 million of profit over the last 12 months, 22% above Danaos Corporation. Ardmore Shipping Corporation shows at least 100% on the scoring scale (146.5% in full) growth from a profit base of $106 million. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: Hafnia Limited sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. has the highest ROCE among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 28.4%. Euroseas Ltd. is next at 18.8%. The same company also has the highest ROCE change, at +17.2 percentage points. 23 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. leads ROCE at 28.4%, 9.6 percentage points above Euroseas Ltd. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Hafnia Limited has the lowest PEG among the 23 Marine Shipping companies compared here, at 0.09×. SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. has the lowest P/E at −11.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 18 of 23 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Hafnia Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.09×, 0% below Navios Maritime Partners L.P. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

This Marine Shipping comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 23 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 23 Marine Shipping companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 4 November 2026.

These 22 answers restate the Marine Shipping comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 23 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 4 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.