Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17

MP Materials Corp.

MP
Materials · Other Industrial Metals & Mining

MP Materials Corp.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 76th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work.

The price is building a base (4 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 76th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed, and 111% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Stage
Mixed
partial read
Price
$49.0
−33.1% 1Y
P/E
85.9×
76th pctile
of its own 2-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.1 B
+50.0% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$−0.0 B
Operating margin
−77.8%
−27.8 pp YoY
ROE
−4%
FY25
ROIC
−4.1%
vs WACC 13.8% → −17.9 pp
Cash conversion
111%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

MP Materials Corp. trades at $49.0, building a base and 4 weeks into that stage. That is −14.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 19% of a 52-week range of $41 to $81. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (13 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is building a base — week 4 of stage 1. At $49.0 it trades −14.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 19% of its 52-week range ($41–$81).

Sep 26: $49.0 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−14.6% versus the 200-day line, week 4 of stage 1
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S4S3S2S2S1$86.4$66.2$46.0$25.8$5.6$$49$57Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S4S4S3S2S2S1$86.4$66.2$46.0$25.8$5.6$$49$57Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2020 Each cell is one week from 2020 to now (326 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jun 20Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 6.2 years the stock moved +393% while the S&P 500 moved +151% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

MP Materials Corp. trades at 85.9× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (76th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 26.5×, measured across 2.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 85.9× is at the pricey end of its own range (76th percentile), against a long-run median of 26.5× measured over 2.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 85.9× vs a 26.5× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 2.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 79× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (76th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
84.4×$1.566.1×$1.247.8×$0.829.5×$0.411.2×$0.0×$79.40×$0Apr 22Oct 22Jun 23Dec 23Aug 24
84.4×$1.566.1×$1.247.8×$0.829.5×$0.411.2×$0.0×$79.40×$0Apr 22Jun 23Aug 24
PEG 13.39 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 19 quarters; values above 6 pinned at the top.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
6.4×4.9×3.3×1.8×0.2××6.00×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
6.4×4.9×3.3×1.8×0.2××6.00×Sep 21Dec 23Mar 26
P/E
85.9×
76th percentile of 2y
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

MP Materials Corp. reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at -8.1% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 12 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +10.0% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
70%141%37%22%3.9%−96%−29%−214%−62%−333%%%10%−300%FY21FY23FY25
70%141%37%22%3.9%−96%−29%−214%−62%−333%%%10%−300%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
49%−6.2%21%−85%−7.2%−164%−35%−243%−63%−322%%%19%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
49%−6.2%21%−85%−7.2%−164%−35%−243%−63%−322%%%19%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
8.3%3.9%−0.5%−4.9%−9.3%%−8.1%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
8.3%3.9%−0.5%−4.9%−9.3%%−8.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Rolling over
latest +19.0% · span −55.6% to +41.2%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −1,100.0% · span −1,100.0% to −28.0%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest −8.1% · span −8.1%–7.1%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+10.0%−25.4%
Stock price−33.1%+29.5%+7.5%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+50.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−9.6%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

38.6/100 — rank 11 of 30 in Other Industrial Metals & Mining · 64% evidence confidence

MP Materials Corp. scores 38.6 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ranking 11. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 7.8 = 38.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

MP Materials Corp. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −9.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.3 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.2 B (+10.0% on the year), capping 4 years at −9.6% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.1 B, +50.0% year on year.

FY25 revenue $0.2 B (+10.0% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−9.6% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
0.670%0.437%0.33.9%0.1−29%0.0−62%$ B%$0B10%FY21FY23FY25
0.670%0.437%0.33.9%0.1−29%0.0−62%$ B%$0B10%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.1 B (+50.0% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.10113%0.0767%0.0521%0.02−25%0.00−71%$ B%$0B50%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.10113%0.0767%0.0521%0.02−25%0.00−71%$ B%$0B50%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +29.1% growth against the decade's −9.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +19.0% over the last 4 quarters against +11.8%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

MP Materials Corp.'s operating margin is −77.8% in the Mar 26 quarter, −27.8 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −90.9% to 62.3%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −77.8%, −27.8 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −90.9%–62.3%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −27.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +5.5 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY25: −90.9% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −90.9–62.3% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
75%18%30%−7.6%−14%−33%−59%−59%−103%−84%%%−90.9%−5.9%FY21FY23FY25
75%18%30%−7.6%−14%−33%−59%−59%−103%−84%%%−90.9%−5.9%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: −77.8% operating margin (−27.8 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
13%121%−35%44%−83%−33%−132%−111%−180%−188%%%−77.8%−27.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13%121%−35%44%−83%−33%−132%−111%−180%−188%%%−77.8%−27.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

MP Materials Corp. posted a net loss of $0.01 B in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.1 B. That loss is 11.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.02 B. 8 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.1 B (null).

FY25 profit $−0.1 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.3152%0.2−9.9%0.1−171%0.0−333%−0.1−495%$ B%$−0B−450%FY21FY23FY25
0.3152%0.2−9.9%0.1−171%0.0−333%−0.1−495%$ B%$−0B−450%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $−0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.02−22%0.01−124%−0.01−225%−0.03−327%−0.04−428%$ B%$0B−200%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.02−22%0.01−124%−0.01−225%−0.03−327%−0.04−428%$ B%$0B−200%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 111% of MP Materials Corp.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $−0.2 B of operating cash against $−0.1 B of profit. After $0.2 B of capital spending, $−0.3 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $−0.2 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B, leaving free cash of $−0.3 B after $0.2 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 111% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $−0.2 B vs profit $−0.1 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution. FY23 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
111% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.40.20.0−0.2−0.4$ B$−0B$−0B$−0BFY21FY23FY25
0.40.20.0−0.2−0.4$ B$−0B$−0B$−0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.04148%0.01−26%−0.01−200%−0.04−374%−0.07−548%$ B%$0B−500%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.04148%0.01−26%−0.01−200%−0.04−374%−0.07−548%$ B%$0B−500%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

MP Materials Corp. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 151.5% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.2 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.40.30.20.10.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.40.30.20.10.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.1 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.090.000.06−0.030.04−0.060.02−0.090.00−0.12$ B$ B$0B$−0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.090.000.06−0.030.04−0.060.02−0.090.00−0.12$ B$ B$0B$−0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

MP Materials Corp. earns a ROE of −4% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −7% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −17.9 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −40.9% net margin on 0.06× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −4%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −7% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −40.9% net margin × 0.06× asset turns × 1.62× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −4.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −4.1% − 13.8% = a −17.9 pp spread. The 13.8% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE −4% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 13.8% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY24's −7%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
46%31%15%0.0%−15%%−3.8%−10.9%FY21FY23FY25
46%31%15%0.0%−15%%−3.8%−10.9%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC −12.1% (TTM) vs WACC 13.8% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
24%14%4.6%−5.2%−15%%−12.1%−5.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
24%14%4.6%−5.2%−15%%−12.1%−5.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

MP Materials Corp. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

MP Materials Corp. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

MP Materials Corp. carries total debt of $1.0 B against shareholder equity of $2.4 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.42. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.68 in FY21 to 0.42 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $1.0 B against shareholder equity of $2.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.42. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.68 (FY21) to 0.42 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $1.0 B at 0.42× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
1.10.9×0.80.8×0.50.6×0.30.5×0.00.4×$ B×$1B0.42×FY21FY23FY25
1.10.9×0.80.8×0.50.6×0.30.5×0.00.4×$ B×$1B0.42×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $1.0 B, debt-to-equity 0.42 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
1.10.9×0.80.8×0.50.7×0.30.5×0.00.4×$ B×$1B0.42×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.10.9×0.80.8×0.50.7×0.30.5×0.00.4×$ B×$1B0.42×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

22.3% of MP Materials Corp.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 22.3% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 4.6 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
22.3%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
4.6
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

MP Materials Corp.: the Z-score reads 5.47. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 5.47 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 5.47.

15 · Related companies · Other Industrial Metals & Mining
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.SCZM 73.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 23.6/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 46.3% · OPM change -5.3 pp 83% evidence 19.5/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence 15.3/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y 23.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.6 + 19.5 + 15.2 + 15.3 = 73.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Teck Resources LimitedTECK 72.1/100Favorable setup77% evidence FADING 24.6/35 Revenue 40.5% · PAT — · OPM change 30.1 pp 71% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 45.5% 76% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 1.03 65% evidence 19.3/20 RS sector 26.9% · RS bench 10.9% · 1Y 63.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 14.9 + 13.3 + 19.3 = 72.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3BHP Group LimitedBHP 68.8/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence FADING 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 26% evidence 21.3/25 ROCE 23.6% · OPM 43.3% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 23.8% · RS bench 8.2% · 1Y 61.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.7 + 21.3 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 68.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Nexa Resources S.A.NEXA 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue 16% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 23.4% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.5/20 RS sector 19.4% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 143.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 13.4 + 10.7 + 15.5 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Almonty Industries Inc.ALM 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.3/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT — · OPM change 87.5 pp 62% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 14% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 10.2% · RS bench -6.3% · 1Y 165.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.3 + 10.2 + 10 + 13.1 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Americas Gold and Silver CorporationUSAS 57.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.8/35 Revenue 58.3% · PAT — · OPM change 87.3 pp 62% evidence 14.6/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 39.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y 52.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.8 + 14.6 + 10 + 7.6 = 57 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Vale S.A.VALE 54.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 12.4/35 Revenue 11% · PAT -65.1% · OPM change -2.4 pp 95% evidence 14.7/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 20.4% 76% evidence 14.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench -8.8% · 1Y 30.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.4 + 14.7 + 14.4 + 12.7 = 54.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
8Materion CorporationMTRN 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 45% evidence 12.0/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 40.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.9/20 RS sector 49.9% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 106.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 12 + 9 + 16.9 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Compass Minerals International, Inc.CMP 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 155.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 6.8% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 32.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 11.4 + 8.5 + 12.7 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Ferroglobe PLCGSM 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 18.8/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT — · OPM change 15.9 pp 62% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y 3.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 9 + 9.3 + 12.1 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11MP Materials Corp.this pageMP 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT — · OPM change -16 pp 62% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM -73.2% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 141.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -12.1% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -33.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 7.8 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12United States Antimony CorporationUAMY 31.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -115.9 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -110.8% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -36.6% · RS bench -44.8% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 3.9 = 31.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Rio Tinto GroupRIO 57.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 15.5% · RS bench 0.8% · 1Y 53.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.8 + 13.8 + 10.4 + 15.8 = 57.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.EMAT 52.6/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence BASING 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 276.6% · OPM -332.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y -67%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.8 + 10 + 9.9 = 52.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Skeena Resources LimitedSKE 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence FADING 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 17.7/20 RS sector 18.7% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y 65.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 6.7 + 10 + 17.7 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Sigma Lithium CorporationSGML 49.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.4 pp 39% evidence 13.7/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 109.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -29.9% · 1Y 48.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 13.7 + 8.8 + 5.7 = 49.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Lithium Argentina AGLAR 47.6/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 0.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -10.3% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y 69.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 10.8 + 11.3 + 7.3 = 47.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Elevra Lithium LimitedELVR 47.5/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y 106.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 14 + 10 + 7 = 47.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19NioCorp Developments Ltd.NB 45.1/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.7/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -35.2% · RS bench -42.3% · 1Y -40.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 8.7 + 11 + 4.3 = 45.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Blue Moon Metals Inc.BMM 43.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -15.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 2.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.7/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 115.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 14.7 = 43.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21IperionX LimitedIPX 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence BASING 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -42.7% · RS bench -49.4% · 1Y -54.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 10 + 3 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Critical Metals Corp.CRML 41.7/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence BASING 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -30.4% · RS bench -39.4% · 1Y -9.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 7.6 + 11.5 + 4.9 = 41.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23TMC the metals company Inc.TMC 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -49.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 5.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.8/20 RS sector -33.3% · RS bench -40.9% · 1Y -37.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 5.4 + 10.9 + 4.8 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Vizsla Silver Corp.VZLA 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence FADING 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.0/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y -7.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.3 + 10 + 8 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Lithium Americas Corp.LAC 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence BASING 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -37.9% · RS bench -44.8% · 1Y -14.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.7 + 10 + 3.6 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Trilogy Metals Inc.TMQ 38.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -29.2% · 1Y 54.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 8.3 + 10 + 5.6 = 38.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Standard Lithium Ltd.SLI 36.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT -127.6% · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.7/20 RS sector -41.1% · RS bench -48.3% · 1Y -32.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 8.9 + 10.1 + 0.7 = 36.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28USA Rare Earth, Inc.USAR 36.2/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -1061% · OPM change — 7% evidence 6.2/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -643.6% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.2/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -27.2% · 1Y -7.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 6.2 + 9.8 + 3.2 = 36.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.NAK 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -12.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -26.3% · RS bench -35.3% · 1Y 42.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.7 + 10.6 + 5.2 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30REalloys Inc.ALOY 32.6/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence FADING 11.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -96.5 pp 39% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -155.8% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.3/20 RS sector -15.9% · RS bench -27.3% · 1Y 20.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 5.2 + 10 + 6.3 = 32.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is MP Materials Corp.'s stock price today?

MP Materials Corp. trades at $49.0, −33.1% over the past year. The company is valued at $9.0 B. The stock sits at 19% of its 52-week range of $41–$81, −14.6% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 4 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.

What were MP Materials Corp.'s latest quarterly results?

MP Materials Corp. reported revenue of $0.1 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.04. The operating margin was −77.8%, 27.8 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s revenue?

MP Materials Corp. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +50.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.2 B (+10.0%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −9.6% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s profit?

MP Materials Corp. earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.1 B. The operating margin ran −77.8% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s market cap?

MP Materials Corp.'s market capitalisation is $9.0 B at a stock price of $49.0. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s P/E ratio?

MP Materials Corp. trades at a P/E of 85.9×, at the 76th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 26.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 17 September 2026.

Does MP Materials Corp. pay a dividend?

No — MP Materials Corp. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is MP Materials Corp. overvalued?

On its own history, MP Materials Corp. looks expensive: its P/E of 85.9× sits at the 76th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 26.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 17 September 2026.

How is MP Materials Corp. performing?

MP Materials Corp. is building a base, 4 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 13 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.

What stage is MP Materials Corp. in?

Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at -8.1% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +19.0% latest, profit growth −1,100.0% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.

Is MP Materials Corp. in an uptrend?

No — the price is building a base (week 4 of stage 1), trading −14.6% versus its 200-day average and at 19% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.

Is MP Materials Corp. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view MP Materials Corp. is currently behind the S&P 500 (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 6.2 years the stock moved +393% against the S&P 500's +151% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.

Will MP Materials Corp.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for MP Materials Corp. What it measures instead: the stock price is $49.0, the price is building a base 4 weeks in. Its P/E of 85.9× sits at the 76th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is the market betting against MP Materials Corp.?

Yes — short interest is 22.3% of MP Materials Corp.'s tradable float, about 4.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.

Does MP Materials Corp. have too much debt?

It is moderate — MP Materials Corp.'s debt-to-equity is 0.41. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s capex?

MP Materials Corp. spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.2 B. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is MP Materials Corp.'s cash flow?

MP Materials Corp. consumed $0.2 B of operating cash in FY25 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: $−0.3 B). Reported profit that year was $−0.1 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is MP Materials Corp.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 111% of MP Materials Corp.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $−0.2 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.

How financially safe is MP Materials Corp.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 5.47 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 17 September 2026.

Where is MP Materials Corp. in its business cycle?

MP Materials Corp.'s FY25 operating margin was −90.9%, against a 5-year band of −90.9%–62.3%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −77.8%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.

What could break the MP Materials Corp. story?

Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 76th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.

Is MP Materials Corp. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: MP Materials Corp.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI