Ferroglobe PLC
GSMFerroglobe PLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −858.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 148% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Ferroglobe PLC trades at $3.4, between stages. That is −21.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 11% of a 52-week range of $3 to $5. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (21 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is between stages. At $3.4 it trades −21.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 11% of its 52-week range ($3–$5).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −25% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (21 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-03-13) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Ferroglobe PLC trades at 33.1× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 37.3×, measured across 0.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 33.1× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 37.3× measured over 0.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −858.3% against a −13.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Ferroglobe PLC reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.5% latest against −1.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -9.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −18.3% | −19.8% | — | — |
| Stock price | −13.9% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
42.0/100 — rank 9 of 30 in Other Industrial Metals & Mining · 58% evidence confidence
Ferroglobe PLC scores 42.0 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ranking 9. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 4.9 = 42. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Ferroglobe PLC reported $0.3 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +12.9% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −6.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.4 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.3 B (−18.3% on the year), capping 4 years at −6.9% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.3 B, +12.9% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −9.8% growth against the decade's −6.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −11.5% over the last 4 quarters against −8.5%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Ferroglobe PLC's operating margin is −2.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +16.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −9.7% to 25.4%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −2.9%, +16.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −9.7%–25.4%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +16.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +11.7 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Ferroglobe PLC posted a net loss of $0.01 B in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.2 B. That loss is 2.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.1 B. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.2 B (−1,000.0%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 148% of Ferroglobe PLC's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $−0.2 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 148% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Ferroglobe PLC does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Ferroglobe PLC earns a ROE of −26% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −38% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −10.9 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −13.4% net margin on 0.94× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −26%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −38% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −13.4% net margin × 0.94× asset turns × 2.06× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −25.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −2.3% − 8.6% = a −10.9 pp spread. The 8.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Ferroglobe PLC paid $0.06 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 7.1% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.01 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $3.4 that is a trailing yield of 1.75%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Ferroglobe PLC paid $0.06 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.01 for Mar 26. That is up 7.1% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $3.4 the trailing twelve months work out to 1.75% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Ferroglobe PLC carries total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.7 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.40. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.94 in FY21 to 0.39 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.7 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.40. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.94 (FY21) to 0.39 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Ferroglobe PLC, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.2 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Ferroglobe PLC: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.SCZM | 65.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.7/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 46.3% · OPM change -5.3 pp 83% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 78.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 19.6 + 15.2 + 7.1 = 65.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Teck Resources LimitedTECK | 65.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 45% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 41.2% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 22.4% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 96%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 14.9 + 9.8 + 18.5 = 65.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Nexa Resources S.A.NEXA | 61.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 20.8/35 Revenue 16% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 23.4% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 33.8% · RS bench 21.2% · 1Y 177.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.8 + 13.4 + 10.7 + 16.7 = 61.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Almonty Industries Inc.ALM | 58.2/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.2/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT — · OPM change 87.5 pp 62% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 11.5% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y 222.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 10.3 + 10 + 13.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Vale S.A.VALE | 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -4.7% · 1Y 45.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 15 + 9.4 + 12.4 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Materion CorporationMTRN | 55.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 40.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 35.4% · RS bench 27.1% · 1Y 113.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 12.1 + 9 + 19.6 = 55.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Americas Gold and Silver CorporationUSAS | 55.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.6/35 Revenue 58.3% · PAT — · OPM change 87.3 pp 62% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 39.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -24.1% · 1Y 60.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 15 + 10 + 5.9 = 55.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Compass Minerals International, Inc.CMP | 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 19.0/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 155.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 21.9% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 39%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 11.5 + 8.5 + 16.1 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Ferroglobe PLCthis pageGSM | 42.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 18.7/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT — · OPM change 15.9 pp 62% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -29.4% · 1Y -15.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 4.9 = 42 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10MP Materials Corp.MP | 35.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT — · OPM change -16 pp 62% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM -73.2% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 141.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -28.1% · RS bench -29.6% · 1Y -36.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 4.2 = 35 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11United States Antimony CorporationUAMY | 33.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -115.9 pp 62% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -110.8% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y 68.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 5.3 = 33.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12BHP Group LimitedBHP | 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM — 46% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 21.1% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 65.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.2 + 9.9 + 18.7 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Rio Tinto GroupRIO | 58.8/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.9/20 RS sector 12.1% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 60.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 13.8 + 10.4 + 16.9 = 58.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.EMAT | 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 276.6% · OPM -332.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y -73.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.8 + 10 + 10.1 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Sigma Lithium CorporationSGML | 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.4 pp 39% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 109.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -3.6% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 104%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 14.1 + 8.8 + 8.3 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Elevra Lithium LimitedELVR | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional15% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 14.2 + 10 + 10 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Lithium Argentina AGLAR | 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 0.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y 128.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 10.8 + 11.3 + 9.7 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18NioCorp Developments Ltd.NB | 47.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -15.4% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y 9.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 8.7 + 11 + 6.6 = 47.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Skeena Resources LimitedSKE | 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 76.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 6.7 + 10 + 13.4 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Blue Moon Metals Inc.BMM | 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -15.7% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 2.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 20.4% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 113.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 15.4 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21IperionX LimitedIPX | 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -43% · RS bench -44.2% · 1Y -37.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 10 + 3.3 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Critical Metals Corp.CRML | 41.3/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence | 7.6/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM — 46% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -38.4% · 1Y 46.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 7.6 + 11.5 + 4.3 = 41.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23TMC the metals company Inc.TMC | 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -49.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 5.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -37% · RS bench -39.2% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 5.4 + 10.9 + 4.6 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Lithium Americas Corp.LAC | 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -37.7% · RS bench -40.7% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.7 + 10 + 3.6 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Trilogy Metals Inc.TMQ | 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y 126.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 8.3 + 10 + 6.5 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26REalloys Inc.ALOY | 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | TURNING | 11.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -96.5 pp 39% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -155.8% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y 66.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.2 + 5.2 + 10 + 13.2 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Vizsla Silver Corp.VZLA | 38.4/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | BASING | 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench -25% · 1Y 3.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.3 + 10 + 5.6 = 38.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.NAK | 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -12.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y 77.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.7 + 10.6 + 7.6 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29USA Rare Earth, Inc.USAR | 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -1061% · OPM change — 7% evidence | 6.2/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -643.6% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -14.1% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 6.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 6.2 + 9.6 + 4.3 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Standard Lithium Ltd.SLI | 36.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -127.6% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -47.2% · 1Y -22.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 8.9 + 10.1 + 0 = 36 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ferroglobe PLC's stock price today?
Ferroglobe PLC trades at $3.4, −13.9% over the past year. The company is valued at $1.0 B. The stock sits at 11% of its 52-week range of $3–$5, −21.4% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Ferroglobe PLC's latest quarterly results?
Ferroglobe PLC reported revenue of $0.3 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.04. The operating margin was −2.9%, 16.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's revenue?
Ferroglobe PLC reported revenue of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +12.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.3 B (−18.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −6.9% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's profit?
Ferroglobe PLC earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.2 B. The operating margin ran −2.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's market cap?
Ferroglobe PLC's market capitalisation is $1.0 B at a stock price of $3.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Ferroglobe PLC pay a dividend?
Yes — Ferroglobe PLC declared $0.01 per share for Mar 26, and $0.06 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 7.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's dividend per share?
Ferroglobe PLC's most recently declared dividend is $0.01 per share for Mar 26, giving $0.06 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's dividend yield?
Ferroglobe PLC's trailing dividend yield is 1.75%: $0.06 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $3.4. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Ferroglobe PLC performing?
Ferroglobe PLC's latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Ferroglobe PLC in?
Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.5% latest against −1.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -9.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −11.5% latest, profit growth −1,000.0% latest, eps growth −866.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ferroglobe PLC beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Ferroglobe PLC is currently behind the S&P 500 (21 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-03-13), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −25% against the S&P 500's +24% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Ferroglobe PLC's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Ferroglobe PLC. What it measures instead: the stock price is $3.4. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Ferroglobe PLC have too much debt?
It is moderate — Ferroglobe PLC's debt-to-equity is 0.31. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's capex?
Ferroglobe PLC spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ferroglobe PLC's cash flow?
Ferroglobe PLC generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ferroglobe PLC's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 148% of Ferroglobe PLC's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Ferroglobe PLC in its business cycle?
Ferroglobe PLC's FY25 operating margin was −9.7%, against a 5-year band of −9.7%–25.4%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −2.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Ferroglobe PLC story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −858.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ferroglobe PLC a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ferroglobe PLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.