Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Ferroglobe PLC

GSM
Materials · Other Industrial Metals & Mining

Ferroglobe PLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −858.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 148% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.

Stage
Deteriorating
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$3.4
−13.9% 1Y
P/E
33.1×
of its own 0-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.3 B
+12.9% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$−0.0 B
Operating margin
−2.9%
+16.5 pp YoY
ROE
−6%
FY25
ROIC
−2.3%
vs WACC 8.6% → −10.9 pp
Cash conversion
148%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Ferroglobe PLC trades at $3.4, between stages. That is −21.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 11% of a 52-week range of $3 to $5. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (21 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $3.4 it trades −21.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 11% of its 52-week range ($3–$5).

Aug 26: $3.4 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
−21.4% versus the 200-day line, week — of stage —
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$5.4$4.8$4.2$3.6$3.0$$3$4Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26Aug 26
$5.4$4.8$4.2$3.6$3.0$$3$4Jul 25Jan 26Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (57 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 25Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −25% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (21 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-03-13) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Ferroglobe PLC trades at 33.1× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 37.3×, measured across 0.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 33.1× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 37.3× measured over 0.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 33.1× vs a 37.3× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 0.1-year window; loss-period spikes above 38× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
38.3×$0.1336.9×$0.1035.5×$0.0634.1×$0.0332.7×$0.00×$33.08×$0Jul 25Jul 25Aug 25
38.3×$0.1336.9×$0.1035.5×$0.0634.1×$0.0332.7×$0.00×$33.08×$0Jul 25Jul 25Aug 25
P/E
33.1×
too little history to rank
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −858.3% against a −13.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Ferroglobe PLC reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.5% latest against −1.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -9.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −18.3% in FY25, profit −1,000.0% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
53%−54%29%−120%4.8%−186%−19%−252%−43%−318%%%−18.3%−300%FY21FY23FY25
53%−54%29%−120%4.8%−186%−19%−252%−43%−318%%%−18.3%−300%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising
RevenueProfitEPS
1.6%−17%−8.6%−93%−19%−169%−29%−245%−39%−321%%%−11.5%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.6%−17%−8.6%−93%−19%−169%−29%−245%−39%−321%%%−11.5%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
23%15%6.0%−2.8%−12%%−9.1%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
23%15%6.0%−2.8%−12%%−9.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Stuck low
latest −11.5% · span −36.4% to −1.2%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −1,000.0% · span −1,000.0% to −37.9%
EPS growth
Falling
latest −866.7% · span −866.7% to −45.0%
ROCE
Falling
latest −9.1% · span −9.1%–21.0%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−18.3%−19.8%
Stock price−13.9%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+12.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−6.9%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

42.0/100 — rank 9 of 30 in Other Industrial Metals & Mining · 58% evidence confidence

Ferroglobe PLC scores 42.0 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ranking 9. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 4.9 = 42. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Ferroglobe PLC reported $0.3 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +12.9% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −6.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.4 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $1.3 B (−18.3% on the year), capping 4 years at −6.9% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.3 B, +12.9% year on year.

FY25 revenue $1.3 B (−18.3% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−6.9% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
2.853%2.129%1.44.8%0.7−19%0.0−43%$ B%$1B−18.3%FY21FY23FY25
2.853%2.129%1.44.8%0.7−19%0.0−43%$ B%$1B−18.3%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.3 B (+12.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.518%0.40.7%0.2−16%0.1−33%0.0−50%$ B%$0B12.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.518%0.40.7%0.2−16%0.1−33%0.0−50%$ B%$0B12.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −9.8% growth against the decade's −6.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −11.5% over the last 4 quarters against −8.5%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Ferroglobe PLC's operating margin is −2.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +16.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −9.7% to 25.4%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −2.9%, +16.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −9.7%–25.4%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +16.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +11.7 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: −9.7% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −9.7–25.4% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
28%27%18%16%7.9%5.2%−2.3%−5.5%−13%−16%%%−9.7%−12.1%FY21FY23FY25
28%27%18%16%7.9%5.2%−2.3%−5.5%−13%−16%%%−9.7%−12.1%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: −2.9% operating margin (+16.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
22%19%9.9%9.0%−2.6%−1.4%−15%−12%−28%−22%%%−2.9%16.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
22%19%9.9%9.0%−2.6%−1.4%−15%−12%−28%−22%%%−2.9%16.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Ferroglobe PLC posted a net loss of $0.01 B in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.2 B. That loss is 2.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.1 B. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.2 B (−1,000.0%).

FY25 profit $−0.2 B (−1,000.0% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.50.0%0.3−271%0.1−539%0.0−806%−0.2−1,074%$ B%$−0B−1,000%FY21FY23FY25
0.50.0%0.3−271%0.1−539%0.0−806%−0.2−1,074%$ B%$−0B−1,000%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $−0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.05−11%0.01−62%−0.02−113%−0.06−163%−0.10−214%$ B%$0B−150%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.05−11%0.01−62%−0.02−113%−0.06−163%−0.10−214%$ B%$0B−150%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 148% of Ferroglobe PLC's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $−0.2 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 148% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.1 B vs profit $−0.2 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
148% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.50.30.10.0−0.2$ B$0B$−0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.50.30.10.0−0.2$ B$0B$−0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $−0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.22110%0.1674%0.1038%0.030.0%−0.03−35%$ B%$0B50%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.22110%0.1674%0.1038%0.030.0%−0.03−35%$ B%$0B50%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Ferroglobe PLC does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.1 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.090.060.040.020.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.090.060.040.020.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.0220.200.0160.140.0110.080.0050.010.000−0.05$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.0220.200.0160.140.0110.080.0050.010.000−0.05$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Ferroglobe PLC earns a ROE of −26% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −38% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −10.9 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −13.4% net margin on 0.94× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −26%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −38% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −13.4% net margin × 0.94× asset turns × 2.06× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −25.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −2.3% − 8.6% = a −10.9 pp spread. The 8.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE −26% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 8.6% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY21's −38%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
66%38%10%−17%−45%%−26.1%−15.5%FY21FY23FY25
66%38%10%−17%−45%%−26.1%−15.5%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC −9.8% (TTM) vs WACC 8.6% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
35%20%4.4%−11%−27%%−9.8%−15.2%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
35%20%4.4%−11%−27%%−9.8%−15.2%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

Ferroglobe PLC paid $0.06 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 7.1% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.01 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $3.4 that is a trailing yield of 1.75%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

Ferroglobe PLC paid $0.06 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.01 for Mar 26. That is up 7.1% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $3.4 the trailing twelve months work out to 1.75% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.

Dividend per share by quarter Declared dividend per share, $ B, per reported quarter. 8 quarters on file.
latest $0.01 (Mar 26)
Dividend per share
0.0160.0120.0080.0040.000$ B$0BMar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26
0.0160.0120.0080.0040.000$ B$0BMar 24Mar 25Mar 26
12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Ferroglobe PLC carries total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.7 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.40. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.94 in FY21 to 0.39 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.7 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.40. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.94 (FY21) to 0.39 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $0.3 B at 0.39× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
0.72.1×0.51.6×0.31.1×0.20.6×0.00.1×$ B×$0B0.39×FY21FY23FY25
0.72.1×0.51.6×0.31.1×0.20.6×0.00.1×$ B×$0B0.39×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $0.3 B, debt-to-equity 0.40 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
0.50.6×0.40.5×0.30.4×0.10.3×0.00.2×$ B×$0B0.40×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.50.6×0.40.5×0.30.4×0.10.3×0.00.2×$ B×$0B0.40×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Ferroglobe PLC, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.2 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Ferroglobe PLC: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

15 · Related companies · Other Industrial Metals & Mining
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.SCZM 65.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 23.7/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 46.3% · OPM change -5.3 pp 83% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 78.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 19.6 + 15.2 + 7.1 = 65.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Teck Resources LimitedTECK 65.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 45% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 41.2% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.5/20 RS sector 22.4% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 96%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 14.9 + 9.8 + 18.5 = 65.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Nexa Resources S.A.NEXA 61.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 20.8/35 Revenue 16% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 23.4% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.7/20 RS sector 33.8% · RS bench 21.2% · 1Y 177.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 13.4 + 10.7 + 16.7 = 61.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Almonty Industries Inc.ALM 58.2/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.2/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT — · OPM change 87.5 pp 62% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 14% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 11.5% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y 222.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 10.3 + 10 + 13.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Vale S.A.VALE 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -4.7% · 1Y 45.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 15 + 9.4 + 12.4 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Materion CorporationMTRN 55.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 45% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 40.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 35.4% · RS bench 27.1% · 1Y 113.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 12.1 + 9 + 19.6 = 55.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Americas Gold and Silver CorporationUSAS 55.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.6/35 Revenue 58.3% · PAT — · OPM change 87.3 pp 62% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 39.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -24.1% · 1Y 60.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 15 + 10 + 5.9 = 55.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Compass Minerals International, Inc.CMP 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 19.0/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 155.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 21.9% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 39%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 11.5 + 8.5 + 16.1 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Ferroglobe PLCthis pageGSM 42.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 18.7/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT — · OPM change 15.9 pp 62% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -29.4% · 1Y -15.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 4.9 = 42 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10MP Materials Corp.MP 35.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT — · OPM change -16 pp 62% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM -73.2% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 141.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.2/20 RS sector -28.1% · RS bench -29.6% · 1Y -36.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 4.2 = 35 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11United States Antimony CorporationUAMY 33.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -115.9 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -110.8% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y 68.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 5.3 = 33.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12BHP Group LimitedBHP 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM — 46% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.7/20 RS sector 21.1% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 65.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.2 + 9.9 + 18.7 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Rio Tinto GroupRIO 58.8/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence ASLEEP 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.9/20 RS sector 12.1% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 60.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 13.8 + 10.4 + 16.9 = 58.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.EMAT 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 276.6% · OPM -332.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y -73.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.8 + 10 + 10.1 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Sigma Lithium CorporationSGML 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.4 pp 39% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 109.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -3.6% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 104%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 14.1 + 8.8 + 8.3 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Elevra Lithium LimitedELVR 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional15% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 14.2 + 10 + 10 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Lithium Argentina AGLAR 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 0.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.7/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y 128.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 10.8 + 11.3 + 9.7 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18NioCorp Developments Ltd.NB 47.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.7/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -15.4% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y 9.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 8.7 + 11 + 6.6 = 47.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Skeena Resources LimitedSKE 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence ASLEEP 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 76.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 6.7 + 10 + 13.4 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Blue Moon Metals Inc.BMM 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -15.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 2.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 20.4% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 113.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 15.4 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21IperionX LimitedIPX 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.3/20 RS sector -43% · RS bench -44.2% · 1Y -37.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 10 + 3.3 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Critical Metals Corp.CRML 41.3/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -38.4% · 1Y 46.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 7.6 + 11.5 + 4.3 = 41.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23TMC the metals company Inc.TMC 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -49.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 5.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -37% · RS bench -39.2% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 5.4 + 10.9 + 4.6 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Lithium Americas Corp.LAC 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -37.7% · RS bench -40.7% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.7 + 10 + 3.6 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Trilogy Metals Inc.TMQ 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.5/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y 126.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 8.3 + 10 + 6.5 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26REalloys Inc.ALOY 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence TURNING 11.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -96.5 pp 39% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -155.8% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y 66.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 5.2 + 10 + 13.2 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Vizsla Silver Corp.VZLA 38.4/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence BASING 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench -25% · 1Y 3.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.3 + 10 + 5.6 = 38.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.NAK 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -12.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y 77.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.7 + 10.6 + 7.6 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29USA Rare Earth, Inc.USAR 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -1061% · OPM change — 7% evidence 6.2/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -643.6% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -14.1% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 6.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 6.2 + 9.6 + 4.3 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Standard Lithium Ltd.SLI 36.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -127.6% · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.0/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -47.2% · 1Y -22.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 8.9 + 10.1 + 0 = 36 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Ferroglobe PLC's stock price today?

Ferroglobe PLC trades at $3.4, −13.9% over the past year. The company is valued at $1.0 B. The stock sits at 11% of its 52-week range of $3–$5, −21.4% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Ferroglobe PLC's latest quarterly results?

Ferroglobe PLC reported revenue of $0.3 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.04. The operating margin was −2.9%, 16.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's revenue?

Ferroglobe PLC reported revenue of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +12.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.3 B (−18.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −6.9% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's profit?

Ferroglobe PLC earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.2 B. The operating margin ran −2.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's market cap?

Ferroglobe PLC's market capitalisation is $1.0 B at a stock price of $3.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Ferroglobe PLC pay a dividend?

Yes — Ferroglobe PLC declared $0.01 per share for Mar 26, and $0.06 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 7.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's dividend per share?

Ferroglobe PLC's most recently declared dividend is $0.01 per share for Mar 26, giving $0.06 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's dividend yield?

Ferroglobe PLC's trailing dividend yield is 1.75%: $0.06 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $3.4. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Ferroglobe PLC performing?

Ferroglobe PLC's latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Ferroglobe PLC in?

Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −11.5% latest against −1.2% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at -9.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −11.5% latest, profit growth −1,000.0% latest, eps growth −866.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Ferroglobe PLC beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Ferroglobe PLC is currently behind the S&P 500 (21 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-03-13), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved −25% against the S&P 500's +24% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Ferroglobe PLC's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Ferroglobe PLC. What it measures instead: the stock price is $3.4. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Ferroglobe PLC have too much debt?

It is moderate — Ferroglobe PLC's debt-to-equity is 0.31. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's capex?

Ferroglobe PLC spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Ferroglobe PLC's cash flow?

Ferroglobe PLC generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Ferroglobe PLC's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 148% of Ferroglobe PLC's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $−0.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Ferroglobe PLC in its business cycle?

Ferroglobe PLC's FY25 operating margin was −9.7%, against a 5-year band of −9.7%–25.4%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −2.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Ferroglobe PLC story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −13.9% in a year while annual EPS moved −858.3% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Ferroglobe PLC a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ferroglobe PLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI