BHP Group Limited
BHPBHP Group Limited's price has outrun its earnings. +61.4% in a year against EPS +8.9% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +61.4% in a year while annual EPS moved +8.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (39 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 98th percentile of its own 9-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +0.7% year on year, and 181% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
BHP Group Limited trades at $84.1, in a confirmed uptrend and 39 weeks into that stage. That is +8.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 71% of a 52-week range of $53 to $97. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (2 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 39 of stage 2. At $84.1 it trades +8.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 71% of its 52-week range ($53–$97).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +187% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
BHP Group Limited trades at 22.2× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 11.4×, measured across 8.7 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 22.2× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 11.4× measured over 8.7 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +8.9% against a +61.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +8.7%/yr price move, ~−9.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+18.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
BHP Group Limited reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — EPS growth swung from −58.1% at the trough to −9.7%, a 2-quarter improving streak, ROCE slipping at 44.9%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +14.6% | +3.0% | +0.5% | — |
| Profit | +17.0% | −3.1% | −0.6% | — |
| EPS | +8.9% | −8.8% | −2.8% | — |
| Stock price | +61.4% | +12.9% | +8.7% | +10.9% |
4-Factor Sector Score
68.8/100 — rank 3 of 30 in Other Industrial Metals & Mining · 51% evidence confidence
BHP Group Limited scores 68.8 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ranking 3. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19.7 + 21.3 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 68.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
BHP Group Limited reported $30.9 B of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +18.3% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 0.5% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at $58.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $110 B.
FY26 revenue came in at $58.8 B (+14.6% on the year), capping 5 years at 0.5% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed $30.9 B, +18.3% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +3.4% growth against the decade's 0.5% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +0.5% over the last 4 quarters against −5.2%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +1.0% vs −28.1%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
BHP Group Limited's operating margin is 43.3% in the Jun 26 quarter, +5.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +1.3 percentage points. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 36.3% to 50.6%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 43.3%, +5.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 36.3%–50.6%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
BHP Group Limited earned $5.9 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +0.7% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was $13.0 B. The 5-year compound rate is −0.6%. That is 19.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $7.9 B.
Jun 26 profit was $5.9 B, +0.7% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed $13.0 B (+17.0%), and the 5-year compound rate is −0.6%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +18.3% and the margin +5.6 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +54.8% vs revenue +3.4%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 181% of BHP Group Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was $21.8 B of operating cash against $13.0 B of profit. After $10.3 B of capital spending, $11.5 B was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of $21.8 B against reported profit of $13.0 B, leaving free cash of $11.5 B after $10.3 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 181% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
BHP Group Limited does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $29.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 16.5% of FY26 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $29.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
BHP Group Limited earns a ROE of 23% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 20% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +13.6 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 22.2% net margin on 0.48× asset turns.
FY26 ROE is 23%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 20% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 22.2% net margin × 0.48× asset turns × 2.16× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 23.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 21.7% − 8.1% = a +13.6 pp spread. The 8.1% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
BHP Group Limited paid $2.82 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.99 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $84.1 that is a trailing yield of 3.35%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
BHP Group Limited paid $2.82 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.99 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $84.1 the trailing twelve months work out to 3.35% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
BHP Group Limited carries total debt of $28.4 B against shareholder equity of $56.3 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.50. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.39 in FY21 to 0.50 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Jun 26: total debt of $28.4 B against shareholder equity of $56.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.50. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.39 (FY21) to 0.50 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
0.4% of BHP Group Limited's tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 6.8 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 0.4% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 6.8 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
BHP Group Limited: the Z-score reads 3.37. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.37 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 3.37.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.SCZM | 73.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.6/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 46.3% · OPM change -5.3 pp 83% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y 23.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 19.5 + 15.2 + 15.3 = 73.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Teck Resources LimitedTECK | 72.1/100Favorable setup77% evidence | FADING | 24.6/35 Revenue 40.5% · PAT — · OPM change 30.1 pp 71% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 45.5% 76% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 1.03 65% evidence | 19.3/20 RS sector 26.9% · RS bench 10.9% · 1Y 63.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 14.9 + 13.3 + 19.3 = 72.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3BHP Group Limitedthis pageBHP | 68.8/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | FADING | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 26% evidence | 21.3/25 ROCE 23.6% · OPM 43.3% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 23.8% · RS bench 8.2% · 1Y 61.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 21.3 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 68.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Nexa Resources S.A.NEXA | 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.1/35 Revenue 16% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 23.4% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 19.4% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 143.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 13.4 + 10.7 + 15.5 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Almonty Industries Inc.ALM | 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.3/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT — · OPM change 87.5 pp 62% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 10.2% · RS bench -6.3% · 1Y 165.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 10.2 + 10 + 13.1 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Americas Gold and Silver CorporationUSAS | 57.0/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.8/35 Revenue 58.3% · PAT — · OPM change 87.3 pp 62% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 39.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -9.7% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y 52.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.8 + 14.6 + 10 + 7.6 = 57 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Vale S.A.VALE | 54.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.4/35 Revenue 11% · PAT -65.1% · OPM change -2.4 pp 95% evidence | 14.7/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 20.4% 76% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench -8.8% · 1Y 30.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.4 + 14.7 + 14.4 + 12.7 = 54.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 8Materion CorporationMTRN | 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 40.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.9/20 RS sector 49.9% · RS bench 31.3% · 1Y 106.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 12 + 9 + 16.9 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Compass Minerals International, Inc.CMP | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 155.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 6.8% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y 32.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 11.4 + 8.5 + 12.7 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Ferroglobe PLCGSM | 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.8/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT — · OPM change 15.9 pp 62% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y 3.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 9 + 9.3 + 12.1 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11MP Materials Corp.MP | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT — · OPM change -16 pp 62% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM -73.2% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 141.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -12.1% · RS bench -22.2% · 1Y -33.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 7.8 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12United States Antimony CorporationUAMY | 31.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -115.9 pp 62% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -110.8% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -36.6% · RS bench -44.8% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 3.9 = 31.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Rio Tinto GroupRIO | 57.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 15.5% · RS bench 0.8% · 1Y 53.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 13.8 + 10.4 + 15.8 = 57.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.EMAT | 52.6/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence | BASING | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 276.6% · OPM -332.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y -67%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.8 + 10 + 9.9 = 52.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Skeena Resources LimitedSKE | 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | FADING | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 18.7% · RS bench 2.7% · 1Y 65.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 6.7 + 10 + 17.7 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Sigma Lithium CorporationSGML | 49.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.4 pp 39% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 109.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -29.9% · 1Y 48.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 13.7 + 8.8 + 5.7 = 49.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Lithium Argentina AGLAR | 47.6/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 0.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -10.3% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y 69.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 10.8 + 11.3 + 7.3 = 47.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Elevra Lithium LimitedELVR | 47.5/100Thin evidence · provisional29% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -24.4% · 1Y 106.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 14 + 10 + 7 = 47.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19NioCorp Developments Ltd.NB | 45.1/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -35.2% · RS bench -42.3% · 1Y -40.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 8.7 + 11 + 4.3 = 45.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Blue Moon Metals Inc.BMM | 43.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -15.7% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 2.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 115.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 14.7 = 43.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21IperionX LimitedIPX | 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -42.7% · RS bench -49.4% · 1Y -54.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 10 + 3 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Critical Metals Corp.CRML | 41.7/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence | BASING | 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence | 7.6/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM — 46% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -30.4% · RS bench -39.4% · 1Y -9.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 7.6 + 11.5 + 4.9 = 41.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23TMC the metals company Inc.TMC | 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -49.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 5.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -33.3% · RS bench -40.9% · 1Y -37.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 5.4 + 10.9 + 4.8 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Vizsla Silver Corp.VZLA | 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | FADING | 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -5.4% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y -7.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.3 + 10 + 8 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Lithium Americas Corp.LAC | 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | BASING | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 9.7/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -37.9% · RS bench -44.8% · 1Y -14.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.7 + 10 + 3.6 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Trilogy Metals Inc.TMQ | 38.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -19.2% · RS bench -29.2% · 1Y 54.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 8.3 + 10 + 5.6 = 38.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Standard Lithium Ltd.SLI | 36.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT -127.6% · OPM change — 33% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.7/20 RS sector -41.1% · RS bench -48.3% · 1Y -32.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 8.9 + 10.1 + 0.7 = 36.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28USA Rare Earth, Inc.USAR | 36.2/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -1061% · OPM change — 7% evidence | 6.2/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -643.6% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -27.2% · 1Y -7.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 6.2 + 9.8 + 3.2 = 36.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.NAK | 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -12.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -26.3% · RS bench -35.3% · 1Y 42.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.7 + 10.6 + 5.2 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30REalloys Inc.ALOY | 32.6/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | FADING | 11.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -96.5 pp 39% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -155.8% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -15.9% · RS bench -27.3% · 1Y 20.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 5.2 + 10 + 6.3 = 32.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is BHP Group Limited's stock price today?
BHP Group Limited trades at $84.1, +61.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $218 B. The stock sits at 71% of its 52-week range of $53–$97, +8.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 39 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.
What were BHP Group Limited's latest quarterly results?
BHP Group Limited reported revenue of $30.9 B and net profit of $5.9 B for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 18.3% and profit rose 0.7% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.82. The operating margin was 43.3%, 5.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's revenue?
BHP Group Limited reported revenue of $30.9 B in the Jun 26 quarter, +18.3% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was $58.8 B (+14.6%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 0.5% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's profit?
BHP Group Limited earned $5.9 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +0.7% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was $13.0 B. The operating margin ran 43.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's market cap?
BHP Group Limited's market capitalisation is $218 B at a stock price of $84.1. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's P/E ratio?
BHP Group Limited trades at a P/E of 22.2×, at the 98th percentile of its own 9-year range, against a long-run median of 11.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 17 September 2026.
Does BHP Group Limited pay a dividend?
Yes — BHP Group Limited declared $0.99 per share for Jun 26, and $2.82 per share across the last four reported quarters. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's dividend per share?
BHP Group Limited's most recently declared dividend is $0.99 per share for Jun 26, giving $2.82 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's dividend yield?
BHP Group Limited's trailing dividend yield is 3.35%: $2.82 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $84.1. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited overvalued?
On its own history, BHP Group Limited looks expensive: its P/E of 22.2× sits at the 98th percentile of its 9-year range (long-run median 11.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited growing?
Yes — BHP Group Limited is growing: latest-quarter revenue +18.3% year on year, profit +0.7%, and the margin +5.6 pp at 43.3%. The 5-year compound rates are 0.5% (revenue) and −0.6% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 17 September 2026.
How is BHP Group Limited performing?
BHP Group Limited is in a confirmed uptrend, 39 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 18.3% and profit rose 0.7% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.
What stage is BHP Group Limited in?
Turning around — EPS growth swung from −58.1% at the trough to −9.7%, a 2-quarter improving streak, ROCE slipping at 44.9%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +0.5% latest, profit growth +1.0% latest, eps growth −9.7% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 39 of stage 2), trading +8.3% versus its 200-day average and at 71% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view BHP Group Limited is currently behind the S&P 500 (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-09-04), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +187% against the S&P 500's +255% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.
Will BHP Group Limited's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for BHP Group Limited. What it measures instead: the stock price is $84.1, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 39 weeks in. Its P/E of 22.2× sits at the 98th percentile of its own 9-year range. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is the market betting against BHP Group Limited?
No — short interest is 0.4% of BHP Group Limited's tradable float, about 6.8 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.
Does BHP Group Limited have too much debt?
It is moderate — BHP Group Limited's debt-to-equity is 0.50. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's capex?
BHP Group Limited spent $29.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was $10.3 B. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is BHP Group Limited's cash flow?
BHP Group Limited generated $21.8 B of operating cash flow in FY26 and $11.5 B of free cash flow after $10.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $13.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 181% of BHP Group Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was $21.8 B against reported profit of $13.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.
How financially safe is BHP Group Limited?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 3.37 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 17 September 2026.
Where is BHP Group Limited in its business cycle?
BHP Group Limited's FY26 operating margin was 42.1%, against a 6-year band of 36.3%–50.6%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 43.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.
What could break the BHP Group Limited story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +61.4% in a year while annual EPS moved +8.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.
Is BHP Group Limited a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: BHP Group Limited's price has outrun its earnings. +61.4% in a year against EPS +8.9% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!