Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

BHP Group Limited

BHP
Materials · Other Industrial Metals & Mining

BHP Group Limited's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +72.4% in a year while annual EPS moved +14.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (33 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +34.6% year on year, and 166% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.

Stage
Turning around
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$87.5
+72.4% 1Y
P/E
21.1×
of its own 9-year range
Revenue (Dec 25)
$27.9 B
+10.8% YoY
Profit (Dec 25)
$7.1 B
+34.6% YoY
Operating margin
43.9%
+7.6 pp YoY
ROE
25%
FY25
ROIC
18.2%
vs WACC 8.0% → +10.2 pp
Cash conversion
166%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

BHP Group Limited trades at $87.5, in a confirmed uptrend and 33 weeks into that stage. That is +20.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 91% of a 52-week range of $52 to $91. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 33 of stage 2. At $87.5 it trades +20.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 91% of its 52-week range ($52–$91).

Aug 26: $87.5 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+20.9% versus the 200-day line, week 33 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S1S4S4S3S2$94.7$80.6$66.4$52.3$38.2$$88$72Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S1S4S4S3S2$94.7$80.6$66.4$52.3$38.2$$88$72Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (527 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +198% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

BHP Group Limited trades at 21.1× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 21.1× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 21.1× vs a null× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 8.6-year window; loss-period spikes above 18× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
19.4×$19.115.0×$14.310.6×$9.56.1×$4.81.7×$0.0×$10.28×$9Jan 18Feb 20Apr 22Jun 24Aug 26
19.4×$19.115.0×$14.310.6×$9.56.1×$4.81.7×$0.0×$10.28×$9Jan 18Apr 22Aug 26
PEG 0.49 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Computed here as quarter-end P/E ÷ trailing-twelve-month EPS growth (only quarters with positive growth), because a reported quarterly PEG is not held for this stock. Last 6 quarters.
below 1.0, the growth looks cheap against the multiple
PEGPEG = 1.0
1.1×0.8×0.5×0.3×0.0××0.49×Jun 21Dec 21Jun 22Dec 22Dec 23
1.1×0.8×0.5×0.3×0.0××0.49×Jun 21Jun 22Dec 23
P/E
21.1×
too little history to rank
PEG
2.49
derived from 3-year earnings growth

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +14.1% against a +72.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +2.7%/yr price move, ~+2.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+0.4 pp from the multiple (roughly flat). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Turning around

Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

BHP Group Limited reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — EPS growth swung from −58.1% at the trough to −38.9% off a 1-quarter-old trough, ROCE holding at 48.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −7.9% in FY25, profit +16.0% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
17%192%7.7%125%−1.5%58%−11%−9.6%−20%−77%%%−7.9%16%FY21FY23FY25
17%192%7.7%125%−1.5%58%−11%−9.6%−20%−77%%%−7.9%16%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
49%193%32%124%15%56%−2.2%−12%−19%−80%%%−6.9%−8.5%−38.9%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
49%193%32%124%15%56%−2.2%−12%−19%−80%%%−6.9%−8.5%−38.9%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
76%65%53%41%29%%48%Jun 20Jun 21Dec 22Jun 24Dec 25
76%65%53%41%29%%48%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
Revenue growth
Flat
latest −6.9% · span −14.6% to +44.4%
Profit growth
Flat
latest −8.5% · span −43.0% to +103.9%
EPS growth
Recovering
latest −38.9% · span −61.5% to +173.7%
ROCE
Steady high
latest 48.0% · span 32.3%–73.1%

Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−7.9%−7.7%
Profit+16.0%−20.8%
EPS+14.1%−33.7%
Stock price+72.4%+13.5%+2.7%+10.9%
Revenue YoY (Dec 25)
+10.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Dec 25)
+34.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−2.6%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

60.7/100 — rank 12 of 30 in Other Industrial Metals & Mining · 38% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

BHP Group Limited scores 60.7 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ranking 12. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.9 + 14.2 + 9.9 + 18.7 = 60.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

BHP Group Limited reported $27.9 B of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +10.8% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −2.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $51.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $108 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $51.3 B (−7.9% on the year), capping 4 years at −2.6% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed $27.9 B, +10.8% year on year.

FY25 revenue $51.3 B (−7.9% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−2.6% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
7017%537.7%35−1.5%18−11%0.0−20%$ B%$51B−7.9%FY21FY23FY25
7017%537.7%35−1.5%18−11%0.0−20%$ B%$51B−7.9%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $27.9 B (+10.8% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
4086%3058%2030%9.91.6%0.0−26%$ B%$28B10.8%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
4086%3058%2030%9.91.6%0.0−26%$ B%$28B10.8%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −0.9% growth against the decade's −2.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −6.9% over the last 4 quarters against −2.0%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −8.5% vs −0.9%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

BHP Group Limited's operating margin is 43.9% in the Dec 25 quarter, +7.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +26.3 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 31.5% to 52.4%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 43.9%, +7.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 31.5%–52.4%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +26.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +15.8 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: 38.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 31.5–52.4% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
54%9.1%48%3.7%42%−1.8%36%−7.2%30%−13%%%38%6.5%FY21FY23FY25
54%9.1%48%3.7%42%−1.8%36%−7.2%30%−13%%%38%6.5%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: 43.9% operating margin (+7.6 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
59%22%48%9.6%37%−2.9%26%−15%15%−28%%%43.9%7.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
59%22%48%9.6%37%−2.9%26%−15%15%−28%%%43.9%7.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

BHP Group Limited earned $7.1 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +34.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $11.1 B. The 4-year compound rate is −5.0%. That is 25.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $1.7 B.

Dec 25 profit was $7.1 B, +34.6% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $11.1 B (+16.0%), and the 4-year compound rate is −5.0%.

FY25 profit $11.1 B (+16.0% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−5.0% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
2472%1843%1214%6.0−15%0.0−44%$ B%$11B16%FY21FY23FY25
2472%1843%1214%6.0−15%0.0−44%$ B%$11B16%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $7.1 B (+34.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
14232%10149%6.967%3.5−16%0.0−99%$ B%$7B34.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
14232%10149%6.967%3.5−16%0.0−99%$ B%$7B34.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +10.8% and the margin +7.6 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +58.3% vs revenue −0.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 166% of BHP Group Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $18.7 B of operating cash against $11.1 B of profit. After $9.4 B of capital spending, $9.2 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $18.7 B against reported profit of $11.1 B, leaving free cash of $9.2 B after $9.4 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 166% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $18.7 B vs profit $11.1 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
166% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
3526178.70.0$ B$19B$11B$9BFY21FY23FY25
3526178.70.0$ B$19B$11B$9BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: operating cash $9.4 B = 132% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
20553%15430%10307%5.1184%0.061%$ B%$9B132%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
20553%15430%10307%5.1184%0.061%$ B%$9B132%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

BHP Group Limited does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $25.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 16.3% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $25.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $9.4 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
107.75.12.60.0$ B$9BFY21FY23FY25
107.75.12.60.0$ B$9BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: capex $5.1 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)
5.54.12.81.40.0$ B$5BJun 20Dec 22Dec 25
5.54.12.81.40.0$ B$5BJun 20Dec 22Dec 25

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

BHP Group Limited earns a ROE of 21% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 20% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +10.2 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 21.7% net margin on 0.47× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 21%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 20% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 21.7% net margin × 0.47× asset turns × 2.08× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 21.2% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 18.2% − 8.0% = a +10.2 pp spread. The 8.0% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.

FY25: ROE 21% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 8.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY24's 20%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
49%38%27%16%5.0%%21.3%19.5%FY21FY23FY25
49%38%27%16%5.0%%21.3%19.5%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: ROIC 16.0% (TTM) vs WACC 8.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
35%28%21%13%6.0%%16%25.2%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
35%28%21%13%6.0%%16%25.2%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
11 · Dividend

Dividend

BHP Group Limited pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

BHP Group Limited does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Debt-to-equity is 0.53 at the latest reading — modestly levered; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.

We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 0.53 — a modest level of leverage behind the returns above. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.

13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

0.3% of BHP Group Limited's tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 5.8 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 0.3% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 5.8 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
0.3%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
5.8
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

BHP Group Limited: the Z-score reads 3.03. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.03 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 3.03.

15 · Related companies · Other Industrial Metals & Mining
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.SCZM 65.6/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 23.7/35 Revenue 28% · PAT 46.3% · OPM change -5.3 pp 83% evidence 19.6/25 ROCE 30.1% · OPM 26.6% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 13× · PEG 0.36 65% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 78.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 19.6 + 15.2 + 7.1 = 65.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Teck Resources LimitedTECK 65.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 45% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 41.2% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.5/20 RS sector 22.4% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 96%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 14.9 + 9.8 + 18.5 = 65.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Nexa Resources S.A.NEXA 61.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 20.8/35 Revenue 16% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 23.4% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 6.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.7/20 RS sector 33.8% · RS bench 21.2% · 1Y 177.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 13.4 + 10.7 + 16.7 = 61.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Almonty Industries Inc.ALM 58.2/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.2/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT — · OPM change 87.5 pp 62% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 14% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 11.5% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y 222.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.2 + 10.3 + 10 + 13.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Vale S.A.VALE 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 25.7% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 30.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -4.7% · 1Y 45.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 15 + 9.4 + 12.4 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Materion CorporationMTRN 55.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 45% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 5.1% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 40.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.6/20 RS sector 35.4% · RS bench 27.1% · 1Y 113.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 12.1 + 9 + 19.6 = 55.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Americas Gold and Silver CorporationUSAS 55.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 24.6/35 Revenue 58.3% · PAT — · OPM change 87.3 pp 62% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 11.6% · OPM 39.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -24.1% · 1Y 60.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 15 + 10 + 5.9 = 55.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Compass Minerals International, Inc.CMP 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 19.0/35 Revenue 6.4% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 12.4% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 155.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 21.9% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 39%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 11.5 + 8.5 + 16.1 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Ferroglobe PLCGSM 42.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 18.7/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT — · OPM change 15.9 pp 62% evidence 9.1/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -2.2% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -29.4% · 1Y -15.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.7 + 9.1 + 9.3 + 4.9 = 42 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10MP Materials Corp.MP 35.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT — · OPM change -16 pp 62% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE -2.3% · OPM -73.2% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 141.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.2/20 RS sector -28.1% · RS bench -29.6% · 1Y -36.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 8.1 + 8.7 + 4.2 = 35 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11United States Antimony CorporationUAMY 33.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -115.9 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -8.9% · OPM -110.8% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y 68.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 5.3 = 33.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12BHP Group Limitedthis pageBHP 60.7/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM — 46% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.7/20 RS sector 21.1% · RS bench 14.4% · 1Y 65.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.2 + 9.9 + 18.7 = 60.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Rio Tinto GroupRIO 58.8/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence ASLEEP 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.9/20 RS sector 12.1% · RS bench 5.3% · 1Y 60.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 13.8 + 10.4 + 16.9 = 58.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.EMAT 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 276.6% · OPM -332.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y -73.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.8 + 10 + 10.1 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Sigma Lithium CorporationSGML 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.4 pp 39% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 32.6% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 109.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -3.6% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 104%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 14.1 + 8.8 + 8.3 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Elevra Lithium LimitedELVR 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional15% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —5 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 14.2 + 10 + 10 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Lithium Argentina AGLAR 50.1/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 0.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.7/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench -9.6% · 1Y 128.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 10.8 + 11.3 + 9.7 = 50.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18NioCorp Developments Ltd.NB 47.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 21.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.7/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -15.4% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y 9.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 8.7 + 11 + 6.6 = 47.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Skeena Resources LimitedSKE 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence ASLEEP 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 76.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 6.7 + 10 + 13.4 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Blue Moon Metals Inc.BMM 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -15.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 2.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 20.4% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 113.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 15.4 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21IperionX LimitedIPX 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.3/20 RS sector -43% · RS bench -44.2% · 1Y -37.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 10 + 3.3 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Critical Metals Corp.CRML 41.3/100Thin evidence · provisional37% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE -14.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -33.9% · RS bench -38.4% · 1Y 46.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 7.6 + 11.5 + 4.3 = 41.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23TMC the metals company Inc.TMC 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 20.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -49.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 5.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -37% · RS bench -39.2% · 1Y -29.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 5.4 + 10.9 + 4.6 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Lithium Americas Corp.LAC 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 9.7/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -37.7% · RS bench -40.7% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.7 + 10 + 3.6 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Trilogy Metals Inc.TMQ 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence ASLEEP 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.5/20 RS sector -14.5% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y 126.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 8.3 + 10 + 6.5 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26REalloys Inc.ALOY 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence TURNING 11.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -96.5 pp 39% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -155.8% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y 66.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 5.2 + 10 + 13.2 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Vizsla Silver Corp.VZLA 38.4/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence BASING 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -22.5% · RS bench -25% · 1Y 3.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.5 + 8.3 + 10 + 5.6 = 38.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.NAK 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE -12.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y 77.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.7 + 10.6 + 7.6 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29USA Rare Earth, Inc.USAR 37.1/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -1061% · OPM change — 7% evidence 6.2/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -643.6% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 17× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -14.1% · RS bench -18.7% · 1Y 6.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 6.2 + 9.6 + 4.3 = 37.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Standard Lithium Ltd.SLI 36.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -127.6% · OPM change — 33% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 13.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.0/20 RS sector -44.4% · RS bench -47.2% · 1Y -22.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 8.9 + 10.1 + 0 = 36 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is BHP Group Limited's stock price today?

BHP Group Limited trades at $87.5, +72.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $216 B. The stock sits at 91% of its 52-week range of $52–$91, +20.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 33 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were BHP Group Limited's latest quarterly results?

BHP Group Limited reported revenue of $27.9 B and net profit of $7.1 B for the Dec 25 quarter. Revenue rose 10.8% and profit rose 34.6% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.22. The operating margin was 43.9%, 7.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is BHP Group Limited's revenue?

BHP Group Limited reported revenue of $27.9 B in the Dec 25 quarter, +10.8% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $51.3 B (−7.9%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −2.6% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is BHP Group Limited's profit?

BHP Group Limited earned $7.1 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +34.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $11.1 B. The operating margin ran 43.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is BHP Group Limited's market cap?

BHP Group Limited's market capitalisation is $216 B at a stock price of $87.5. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does BHP Group Limited pay a dividend?

No — BHP Group Limited has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is BHP Group Limited growing?

Yes — BHP Group Limited is growing: latest-quarter revenue +10.8% year on year, profit +34.6%, and the margin +7.6 pp at 43.9%. The 4-year compound rates are −2.6% (revenue) and −5.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.

How is BHP Group Limited performing?

BHP Group Limited is in a confirmed uptrend, 33 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 10.8% and profit rose 34.6% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is BHP Group Limited in?

Turning around — EPS growth swung from −58.1% at the trough to −38.9% off a 1-quarter-old trough, ROCE holding at 48.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −6.9% latest, profit growth −8.5% latest, eps growth −38.9% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is BHP Group Limited in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 33 of stage 2), trading +20.9% versus its 200-day average and at 91% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is BHP Group Limited beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view BHP Group Limited is currently behind the S&P 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +198% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will BHP Group Limited's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for BHP Group Limited. What it measures instead: the stock price is $87.5, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 33 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against BHP Group Limited?

No — short interest is 0.3% of BHP Group Limited's tradable float, about 5.8 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

Does BHP Group Limited have too much debt?

It is moderate — BHP Group Limited's debt-to-equity is 0.53. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is BHP Group Limited's capex?

BHP Group Limited spent $25.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $9.4 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is BHP Group Limited's cash flow?

BHP Group Limited generated $18.7 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $9.2 B of free cash flow after $9.4 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $11.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is BHP Group Limited's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 166% of BHP Group Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $18.7 B against reported profit of $11.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is BHP Group Limited?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 3.03 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is BHP Group Limited in its business cycle?

BHP Group Limited's FY25 operating margin was 38.0%, against a 5-year band of 31.5%–52.4%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 43.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the BHP Group Limited story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +72.4% in a year while annual EPS moved +14.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is BHP Group Limited a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: BHP Group Limited's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI