Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Stocks
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic: PepsiCo, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Celsius Holdings, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
How has Beverages - Non-Alcoholic moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 16% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 14% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 9/12 >200d (+0) · 2/12 lead (−2) · EPS 10/12↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 12 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Beverages - Non-Alcoholic outperforming S&P 500?
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 4.8%. 5 of 11 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Monster Beverage Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +14.8%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 11 beat the sector itself. PepsiCo, Inc. leads with revenue of $96,904 million, based on 8 of 13 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Monster Beverage CorporationMNST | 66.6/100Favorable setup66% evidence | FADING | 21.4/35 Revenue 18% · PAT 34.5% · OPM change 0.3 pp 53% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 9.1% · OPM 31% 57% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 35× · PEG 0.97 65% evidence | 17.5/20 RS sector 14.8% · RS bench 8.3% · 1Y 45.6%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 15.8 + 11.9 + 17.5 = 66.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2The Vita Coco Company, Inc.COCO | 63.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 22.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 39% evidence | 18.1/25 ROCE 17.4% · OPM 18.7% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 36.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 12.2% · RS bench 5.9% · 1Y 98.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 18.1 + 9.4 + 13.1 = 63.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3The Coca-Cola CompanyKO | 59.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 39% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 25.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 10.1% · RS bench 3.8% · 1Y 23.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 14.4 + 10 + 16.7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4PepsiCo, Inc.PEP | 55.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 24.4/35 Revenue 5.6% · PAT 38.3% · OPM change 8.7 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 16.6% 76% evidence | 15.9/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG 0.48 65% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -16.3% · 1Y -4.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 11.8 + 15.9 + 3.2 = 55.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11% and the one-year return is -4.2%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 5Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.KDP | 50.5/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence | FADING | 14.4/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 21.8% · OPM change -3 pp 53% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 19% 57% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG 0.86 65% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 3% · RS bench -2.9% · 1Y -9.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 9.8 + 14.2 + 12.1 = 50.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 6Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.COKE | 47.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.8 pp 39% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 12.9% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 22.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector 5.6% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y 58.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.8 + 12.4 + 10.3 + 9.4 = 47.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Primo Brands CorporationPRMB | 47.1/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 40% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 8.5% 57% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 134.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.6/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench 0% · 1Y -1.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 7.5 + 8.5 + 14.6 = 47.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Celsius Holdings, Inc.CELH | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | BASING | 23.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 56.8% · OPM change 2 pp 53% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 17.8% 57% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 82.5× · PEG 2.4 65% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -36.1% · RS bench -40% · 1Y -43.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 10.2 + 6.1 + 2.9 = 42.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -36.1% and the one-year return is -43.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 9National Beverage Corp.FIZZ | 33.1/100Adverse evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.3/35 Revenue -1.7% · PAT -2.7% · OPM change -1.4 pp 83% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 16.9% 76% evidence | 6.5/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG 3.72 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -14.3% · RS bench -19.3% · 1Y -31.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.3 + 14 + 6.5 + 4.3 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLCCCEP | 56.4/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM — 46% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 18.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 6.8% · RS bench 0.6% · 1Y 12%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 10.7 + 11.2 + 16.5 = 56.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Suja Life, Inc.SUJA | 48.8/100Thin evidence · provisional14% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 6% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 8.7% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 1 week ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 11.7 + 10 + 10 = 48.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Buda Juice, Inc.BUDA | 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence | 11.5/35 Revenue 16.7% · PAT -25% · OPM change -10 pp 53% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 5.4% · OPM 16.9% 57% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 42.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 11 weeks ahead 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 11.5 + 10.8 + 9.1 + 10 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Zevia PBCZVIA | 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional42% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 20.6/35 Revenue 11.1% · PAT — · OPM change 11.7 pp 40% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -6.6% · OPM -5.1% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -15.6% · RS bench -20.4% · 1Y -47.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 5.4 + 10 + 3.9 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic at +98.5%. Monster Beverage Corporation leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +8.3%. 5 of 11 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Beverages - Non-Alcoholic itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
PepsiCo, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies compared here, at $96,904 million. Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. is next at $16,944 million. Celsius Holdings, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: PepsiCo, Inc. is the scale leader at $96,904 million, 471.9% ahead of Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 123.4% from a $2,969 million base, with 18 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: PepsiCo, Inc. is the scale benchmark; Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: PepsiCo, Inc.'s growth falls below Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepsiCo, Inc. PEP | $24.2B | 6.4% | Jun 2026 |
| The Coca-Cola Company KO | $12.5B | -0.5% | Sep 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC CCEP | $10.6B | 0.2% | Dec 2025 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. KDP | $4.0B | 9.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Monster Beverage Corporation MNST | $2.4B | 27% | Mar 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. COKE | $1.8B | -0.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Primo Brands Corporation PRMB | $1.6B | 0.7% | Mar 2026 |
| Celsius Holdings, Inc. CELH | $783M | 138% | Mar 2026 |
| National Beverage Corp. FIZZ | $297M | -5.4% | Jun 2026 |
| The Vita Coco Company, Inc. COCO | $180M | 37% | Jun 2026 |
| Suja Life, Inc. SUJA | $107M | 23% | Mar 2026 |
| Zevia PBC ZVIA | $46M | 21% | Mar 2026 |
| Buda Juice, Inc. BUDA | $4M | 33% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
Suja Life, Inc. · SUJA
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
Suja Life, Inc. · SUJA
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
The Coca-Cola Company has the highest OPM among the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies compared here, at 35%. Monster Beverage Corporation is next at 31%. Zevia PBC has the highest Margin change at +11.7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: The Coca-Cola Company leads opm at 35%; Zevia PBC leads margin change at +11.7 percentage points.
Investor read: The Coca-Cola Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Coca-Cola Company KO | 35% | +0.9 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Monster Beverage Corporation MNST | 31% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. KDP | 19% | −3.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| The Vita Coco Company, Inc. COCO | 19% | +4.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Celsius Holdings, Inc. CELH | 18% | +2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| National Beverage Corp. FIZZ | 17% | −1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Buda Juice, Inc. BUDA | 17% | −10.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. PEP | 17% | +8.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. COKE | 13% | −1.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Primo Brands Corporation PRMB | 8.5% | −1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Zevia PBC ZVIA | -5.1% | +11.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Buda Juice, Inc. · BUDA
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Margin change · reported quarter history
Buda Juice, Inc. · BUDA
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Profit Scale & Acceleration
PepsiCo, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies compared here, at $10,515 million. Monster Beverage Corporation is next at $2,031 million. Celsius Holdings, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at 56.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 8 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: PepsiCo, Inc. leads with $10,515 million of TTM profit, 417.7% above Monster Beverage Corporation. Celsius Holdings, Inc. shows 56.8% growth from a $174 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: PepsiCo, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Coca-Cola Company KO | $4.0B | 4.3% | Sep 2026 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. PEP | $3.0B | 135% | Jun 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC CCEP | $1.0B | 65% | Dec 2025 |
| Monster Beverage Corporation MNST | $569M | 28% | Mar 2026 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. KDP | $270M | -48% | Mar 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. COKE | $112M | -40% | Jun 2026 |
| Celsius Holdings, Inc. CELH | $110M | 150% | Mar 2026 |
| National Beverage Corp. FIZZ | $40M | -11% | Jun 2026 |
| The Vita Coco Company, Inc. COCO | $30M | 58% | Jun 2026 |
| Primo Brands Corporation PRMB | $27M | -23% | Mar 2026 |
| Suja Life, Inc. SUJA | $8M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Buda Juice, Inc. BUDA | $0M | -100% | Mar 2026 |
| Zevia PBC ZVIA | $-2M | — | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
Suja Life, Inc. · SUJA
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Buda Juice, Inc. · BUDA
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Return On Capital Employed
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies compared here, at 17.4%. Monster Beverage Corporation is next at 9.1%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +8.2 percentage points. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Vita Coco Company, Inc. leads ROCE at 17.4%, 8.3 percentage points above Monster Beverage Corporation. The Vita Coco Company, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +8.2 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: The Vita Coco Company, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Vita Coco Company, Inc. COCO | 17% | +8.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Monster Beverage Corporation MNST | 9.1% | +1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Suja Life, Inc. SUJA | 8.7% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| National Beverage Corp. FIZZ | 8.0% | −1.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. COKE | 6.5% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Coca-Cola Company KO | 5.7% | +0.8 pp | Sep 2026 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. PEP | 5.5% | +2.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Buda Juice, Inc. BUDA | 5.4% | −29.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Celsius Holdings, Inc. CELH | 5.0% | +1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC CCEP | 3.2% | +1.0 pp | Dec 2025 |
| Primo Brands Corporation PRMB | 1.5% | −0.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. KDP | 1.4% | −0.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Zevia PBC ZVIA | -6.6% | +6.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
Suja Life, Inc. · SUJA
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
Suja Life, Inc. · SUJA
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
Zevia PBC · ZVIA
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
PepsiCo, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies compared here, at 0.48×. Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. is next at 0.86×. National Beverage Corp. has the lowest P/E at 17.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: PepsiCo, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.48×, 44.2% below Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.. Only 5 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Beverage Corp. FIZZ | 3.7 | 17.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Celsius Holdings, Inc. CELH | 2.4 | 82.5 | Mar 2026 |
| The Coca-Cola Company KO | 1.0 | 25.3 | Sep 2026 |
| The Vita Coco Company, Inc. COCO | 1.0 | 36.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Monster Beverage Corporation MNST | 1.0 | 35.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. KDP | 0.9 | 19.5 | Mar 2026 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. PEP | 0.5 | 18.9 | Jun 2026 |
| Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC CCEP | — | 18.2 | Dec 2025 |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. COKE | — | 22.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Primo Brands Corporation PRMB | — | 134.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Buda Juice, Inc. BUDA | — | 42.4 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
P/E · reported quarter history
Buda Juice, Inc. · BUDA
Celsius Holdings, Inc. · CELH
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · COKE
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC · CCEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. · KDP
Monster Beverage Corporation · MNST
National Beverage Corp. · FIZZ
PepsiCo, Inc. · PEP
Primo Brands Corporation · PRMB
The Coca-Cola Company · KO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. · COCO
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Beverages - Non-Alcoholic comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 8 of the 13 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 8 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic sector outperforming S&P 500?
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks. 5 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 11 beat the sector itself.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company is largest by revenue?
PepsiCo, Inc. leads with revenue of $96,904 million, based on 8 of 13 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company is growing fastest?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 8 of 13 comparable companies.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Monster Beverage Corporation ranks first at 66.6/100 with 65.9% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company has the lowest comparable PEG?
PepsiCo, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.48, among 5 of 13 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Beverages - Non-Alcoholic comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company is the biggest?
PepsiCo, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $96,904 million, ahead of Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. at $16,944 million. That covers 8 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company has the best profit margins?
The Coca-Cola Company has the highest operating margin at 35%, from 11 of 13 comparable companies. Zevia PBC shows the biggest recent improvement, at +11.7 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company makes the most profit?
PepsiCo, Inc. earns the most, at $10,515 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 8 of 13 comparable companies. Celsius Holdings, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at 56.8%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company earns the highest return on capital?
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 17.4%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — PepsiCo, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.48×. Only 5 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic sector beating the market?
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic has underperformed S&P 500 by 10.2% over the last 52 weeks and 4.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 5 of 11 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic stock has the strongest price momentum?
Monster Beverage Corporation has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Beverages - Non-Alcoholic company scores highest for research priority?
Monster Beverage Corporation scores 66.6 out of 100 with 65.9% evidence confidence, from 21.4 points on growth and earnings, 15.8 on capital efficiency, 11.9 on valuation and 17.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic sector?
The 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies on this page carry $778,288 million of combined market value. The Coca-Cola Company is the largest at $372,429 million, about 48% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 13 Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies on this page is 25.3×, measured on the 11 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic sector performing?
5 of the 11 covered Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 10.2% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Beverages - Non-Alcoholic stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 13 listed Beverages - Non-Alcoholic companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.