MOIL Ltd
MOILMOIL Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −16.4% in a year against EPS −43.7% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −16.4% in a year while annual EPS moved −43.7% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a downtrend (33 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit −7.3% year on year, and 88% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
MOIL Ltd trades at ₹281, in a downtrend and 33 weeks into that stage. That is −9.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 16% of a 52-week range of ₹260 to ₹392. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (10 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 33 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹281 it trades −9.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 16% of its 52-week range (₹260–₹392).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +176% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (10 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-12) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
MOIL Ltd trades at 55.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (72nd percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 35.3×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 55.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (72nd percentile), against a long-run median of 35.3× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −43.7% against a −16.4% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +8.1%/yr price move, ~+0.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+8.1 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +8.6%/yr price move, ~−10.2%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+18.8 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
MOIL Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 7 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −28.1% | +1.9% | +4.7% | — |
| Profit | −48.1% | −6.9% | −10.3% | — |
| EPS | −43.7% | −3.2% | −3.9% | — |
| Share price | −16.4% | +15.2% | +8.1% | +8.6% |
4-Factor Sector Score
29.5/100 — rank 12 of 13 in Mining/Minerals · 77% evidence confidence
MOIL Ltd scores 29.5 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in Mining/Minerals, ranking 12. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 6.3 + 11.8 + 7.3 + 4.1 = 29.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
MOIL Ltd reported ₹268 Cr of revenue in the Dec 20 quarter, +4.7% year on year. That is the 2nd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 4.7% a year. The last full year, FY20, came in at ₹1,034 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹976 Cr.
FY20 revenue came in at ₹1,034 Cr (−28.1% on the year), capping 5 years at 4.7% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 20) printed ₹268 Cr, +4.7% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −15.7% growth against the decade's 4.7% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
MOIL Ltd's operating margin is 28.0% in the Dec 20 quarter, +6.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 11.0% to 46.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 28.0%, +6.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 11.0%–46.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +6.8 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
MOIL Ltd earned ₹51.0 Cr of net profit in the Dec 20 quarter, −7.3% year on year. Full-year FY20 profit was ₹248 Cr. The 5-year compound rate is −10.3%. That is 19.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹55.0 Cr.
Dec 20 profit was ₹51.0 Cr, −7.3% year on year. On the full year, FY20 printed ₹248 Cr (−48.1%), and the 5-year compound rate is −10.3%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +4.7% and the margin +6.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −72.0% vs revenue −15.7%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 88% of MOIL Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY20 that was ₹58.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹248 Cr of profit. After ₹198 Cr of capital spending, ₹−140 Cr was left as free cash.
FY20: operating cash of ₹58.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹248 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−140 Cr after ₹198 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 88% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 88%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY15 and FY20 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.7× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
MOIL Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 47 days in FY20, down from 48 days in FY15. Capital spending ran ₹612 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY20 sales of ₹1,034 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹2.8 Cr, so roughly ₹133 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY20: debtors at 47 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 47 days, tighter than FY15's 48.
In money terms: at FY20 sales of ₹1,034 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹2.8 Cr — so the 47-day loop keeps roughly ₹133 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹612 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹225 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹242 Cr (FY20) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
MOIL Ltd earns a ROCE of 11% in FY20. That is up from a trough of 8% in FY16. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −0.3 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 24.0% net margin on 0.31× asset turns.
FY20 ROCE is 11%, recovered from a FY16 trough of 8% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY20): 24.0% net margin × 0.31× asset turns × 1.19× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.9% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 11.7% − 12.0% = a −0.3 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
MOIL Ltd carries ₹0.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹2,763 Cr of equity in FY20, a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹612 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY20: borrowings of ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,763 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹0.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹612 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions cut 3.2 points of MOIL Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 6.8% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.3 points over the same window, to 3.7%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −3.2 points over 8 quarters to 6.8%; Foreign institutions: +0.3 points over 8 quarters to 3.7%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 64.7%.
🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−3.2 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
MOIL Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1South West Pinnacle Exploration LtdSOUTHWEST | 79.6/100Favorable setup87% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.6/35 Revenue 39.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9.8 pp 95% evidence | 19.3/25 ROCE 20% · OPM 24.2% 95% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 17.5/20 RS sector 12.3% · RS bench 20.7% · 1Y 67.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.6 + 19.3 + 12.2 + 17.5 = 79.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Vedanta LtdVEDL | 60.9/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | FADING | 21.2/35 Revenue 2% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change 8 pp 95% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 16.1% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 64.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 15.6 + 10.3 + 13.8 = 60.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Ashapura Minechem LtdASHAPURMIN | 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence | TURNING | 22.8/35 Revenue 91.3% · PAT 43.8% · OPM change -9 pp 83% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 20.7% · OPM 6% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y 28.4%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 17.5 + 11.1 + 9 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys LtdIMFA | 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 10.3% · PAT 12.4% · OPM change 9 pp 88% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 18.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG 1.08 100% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 3.8% · RS bench 12.2% · 1Y 95.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 16.1 + 10.9 + 12.4 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Midwest Energy Ltd526570 | 50.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 1202.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -55.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 97.8% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y 192.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 3.6 + 10 + 14.9 = 50.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Coal India LtdCOALINDIA | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.3/35 Revenue 6.1% · PAT -5.9% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 21.2/25 ROCE 35.3% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 8.2× · PEG — 50% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 8.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.3 + 21.2 + 11.6 + 8.2 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 720 Microns Ltd20MICRONS | 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 14.3/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 17.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 10× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -40.9% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -28.3%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.3 + 17.6 + 12.2 + 5 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Deccan Gold Mines LtdDECNGOLD | 44.9/100Mixed-negative evidence62% evidence | TURNING | 21.5/35 Revenue 71.5% · PAT -50.8% · OPM change 4492.4 pp 83% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -13.1% · OPM -13.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 48.9% · 1Y 50.5%7 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 3.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 44.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9KIOCL LtdKIOCL | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.7/35 Revenue 4.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 31 pp 65% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1341× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 7.4%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 6.2 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Orissa Minerals Development Company LtdORISSAMINE | 38.9/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.1/35 Revenue 45.7% · PAT 92.8% · OPM change 511.5 pp 62% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM -32.2% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -19.5%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 8 + 10 + 3.8 = 38.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation LtdGMDCLTD | 38.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.6/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 8.0/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG 1.28 100% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 29.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.6 + 11.2 + 8 + 4.3 = 38.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12MOIL Ltdthis pageMOIL | 29.5/100Adverse evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.3/35 Revenue -20.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change -28.5 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 11.4% · OPM 20.5% 95% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 55× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.1/20 RS sector -29.2% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -25.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.3 + 11.8 + 7.3 + 4.1 = 29.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Bharat Coking Coal LtdBHARATCOAL | 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | FADING | 11.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -6.8 pp 45% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 4% · OPM -1.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 6.5 + 10 + 10 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is MOIL Ltd's share price today?
MOIL Ltd trades at ₹281, −16.4% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹5,719 Cr. The stock sits at 16% of its 52-week range of ₹260–₹392, −9.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 33 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were MOIL Ltd's latest quarterly results?
MOIL Ltd reported revenue of ₹268 Cr and net profit of ₹51.0 Cr for the Dec 20 quarter. Revenue rose 4.7% and profit fell 7.3% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.16. The operating margin was 28.0%, 6.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's revenue?
MOIL Ltd reported revenue of ₹268 Cr in the Dec 20 quarter, +4.7% year on year. For the full FY20 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,034 Cr (−28.1%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 4.7% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's profit?
MOIL Ltd earned ₹51.0 Cr of net profit in the Dec 20 quarter, −7.3% year on year. Full-year FY20 profit was ₹248 Cr. The operating margin ran 28.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's market cap?
MOIL Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹5,719 Cr at a share price of ₹281. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's P/E ratio?
MOIL Ltd trades at a P/E of 55.0×, at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 35.3×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does MOIL Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — MOIL Ltd's dividend payout was 57% of profit in FY20, and it recorded a payout in each of its last 6 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, MOIL Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 55.0× sits at the 72nd percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 35.3×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd growing?
Yes — MOIL Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +4.7% year on year, profit −7.3%, and the margin +6.0 pp at 28.0%. The 5-year compound rates are 4.7% (revenue) and −10.3% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is MOIL Ltd performing?
MOIL Ltd is in a downtrend, 33 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 4.7% and profit fell 7.3% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 10 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 33 of stage 4), trading −9.2% versus its 200-day average and at 16% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view MOIL Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (10 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-12), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +176% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will MOIL Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for MOIL Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹281, the price is in a downtrend 33 weeks in. Its P/E of 55.0× sits at the 72nd percentile of its own 10-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns MOIL Ltd?
Promoters hold 64.7% of MOIL Ltd, foreign institutions 3.7%, domestic institutions 6.8% and the public 24.8% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 3.2 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does MOIL Ltd have too much debt?
No — MOIL Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.00, and operating profit covers the interest bill 100×. FY20 borrowings were ₹0.0 Cr against equity of ₹2,763 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's capex?
MOIL Ltd spent ₹612 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY20 alone that was ₹198 Cr, with ₹242 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is MOIL Ltd's cash flow?
MOIL Ltd generated ₹58.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY20 and ₹−140 Cr of free cash flow after ₹198 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹248 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 88% of MOIL Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY20, operating cash was ₹58.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹248 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is MOIL Ltd in its business cycle?
MOIL Ltd's FY20 operating margin was 25.0%, against a 6-year band of 11.0%–46.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 28.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the MOIL Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved −16.4% in a year while annual EPS moved −43.7% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is MOIL Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: MOIL Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. −16.4% in a year against EPS −43.7% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.