Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd

ORISSAMINE
Mining/Minerals

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −583% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is in a downtrend (80 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 92nd percentile of its own 10-year range. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Price
₹3,986
−17.2% 1Y
P/E
987.6×
92nd pctile
of its own 10-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹29.0 Cr
+331.5% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
₹−7.6 Cr
Operating margin
−32.2%
+511.5 pp YoY
ROCE
10%
FY26
ROIC
8.6%
vs WACC 12.0% → −3.4 pp
Cash conversion
−583%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified. PEG is the exception: the quarterly curve is not drawn at all. PEG asks what is being paid for growth — both sides of that division come from the source that could not be checked, so it is withheld instead of marked.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd trades at ₹3,986, in a downtrend and 80 weeks into that stage. That is −7.4% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 29% of a 52-week range of ₹3,307 to ₹5,657. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (8 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 80 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹3,986 it trades −7.4% versus its 200-day average and sits at 29% of its 52-week range (₹3,307–₹5,657).

Jul 26: ₹3,986 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−7.4% versus the 200-day line, week 80 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4₹9,873₹8,021₹6,169₹4,317₹2,465₹3,986₹4,307Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S4₹9,873₹8,021₹6,169₹4,317₹2,465₹3,986₹4,307Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (546 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +145% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd trades at 987.6× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (92nd percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 335.6×, measured across 9.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 987.6× is at the pricey end of its own range (92nd percentile), against a long-run median of 335.6× measured over 9.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 987.6× vs a 335.6× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 9.6-year window; loss-period spikes above 1,007× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (92nd percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
1,082.0×₹28.2811.5×₹21.1541.0×₹14.1270.5×₹7.00.0×₹0.0×987.60×₹6Mar 16Feb 17Dec 17Nov 24Oct 25
1,082.0×₹28.2811.5×₹21.1541.0×₹14.1270.5×₹7.00.0×₹0.0×987.60×₹6Mar 16Dec 17Oct 25
P/E
987.6×
92nd percentile of 10y

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +0.6%/yr price move, ~+33.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−33.3 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +45.6% in FY26 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
147%−17%92%−93%37%−169%−17%−245%−72%−321%%%45.6%−300%FY16FY21FY26
147%−17%92%−93%37%−169%−17%−245%−72%−321%%%45.6%−300%FY16FY21FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
330%348%220%174%110%0.0%0.0%−174%−111%−348%%%300%297.5%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
330%348%220%174%110%0.0%0.0%−174%−111%−348%%%300%297.5%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Rising
latest +331.5% · span −80.2% to +100.0%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+45.6%+38.4%
Share price−17.2%+0.6%+5.5%+5.8%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+331.5%
latest quarter vs a year ago
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

38.9/100 — rank 10 of 13 in Mining/Minerals · 59% evidence confidence

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd scores 38.9 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in Mining/Minerals, ranking 10. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.1 + 8 + 10 + 3.8 = 38.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd reported ₹29.0 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +331.5% year on year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹94.1 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹94.1 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹94.1 Cr (+45.6% on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹29.0 Cr, +331.5% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹94.1 Cr (+45.6% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
RevenueYoY growth
102147%7692%5137%25−17%0−72%₹ Cr%₹9445.6%FY16FY21FY26
102147%7692%5137%25−17%0−72%₹ Cr%₹9445.6%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹29.0 Cr (+331.5% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
37426%28290%18154%918%0−118%₹ Cr%₹29331.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
37426%28290%18154%918%0−118%₹ Cr%₹29331.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +45.7% over the last 4 quarters against +6.9%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's operating margin is −32.2% in the Mar 26 quarter, +511.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −43.3% to 30.7%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −32.2%, +511.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −43.3%–30.7%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +511.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −60.5 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY26: 9.7% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −43.3–30.7% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
37%70%15%32%−6.3%−6.1%−28%−44%−49%−82%%%9.7%53%FY22FY24FY26
37%70%15%32%−6.3%−6.1%−28%−44%−49%−82%%%9.7%53%FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: −32.2% operating margin (+511.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
98%599%−74%282%−247%−36%−419%−353%−591%−671%%%−32.2%511.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
98%599%−74%282%−247%−36%−419%−353%−591%−671%%%−32.2%511.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd posted a net loss of ₹7.6 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹2.9 Cr. That loss is 26.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹31.7 Cr. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was ₹−7.6 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−2.9 Cr (null).

FY26 profit ₹−2.9 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
48275%−86−861%−220−1,997%−354−3,133%−489−4,270%₹ Cr%₹−3−1,526.2%FY16FY21FY26
48275%−86−861%−220−1,997%−354−3,133%−489−4,270%₹ Cr%₹−3−1,526.2%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹−7.6 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
1712,067%48,713%−95,359%−222,006%−35−1,348%₹ Cr%₹−8297.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1712,067%48,713%−95,359%−222,006%−35−1,348%₹ Cr%₹−8297.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −583% of Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹35.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−2.9 Cr of profit. After ₹75.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−40.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹35.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−2.9 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−40.0 Cr after ₹75.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −583% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹35.0 Cr vs profit ₹−2.9 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution.
−583% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
22625−175−375−575₹ Cr₹35₹−3₹−40FY16FY21FY26
22625−175−375−575₹ Cr₹35₹−3₹−40FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = −920% of profit (three-year rate −583%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
182%−114%−410%−706%−1,002%%−920%FY16FY21FY26
182%−114%−410%−706%−1,002%%−920%FY16FY21FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −583%: the cash cycle tightened 1,006 days between FY22 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 18.8× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 0 days in FY26, down from 1,006 days in FY22. Capital spending ran ₹188 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹94.1 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.3 Cr, so roughly ₹0.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 0 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 0 days, tighter than FY22's 1,006.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹94.1 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.3 Cr — so the 0-day loop keeps roughly ₹0.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 0-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 9-year window.
−1,006 days vs FY22
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
58,15542,53926,92411,308−4,308days0d1,167d0d161dFY15FY19FY22FY24FY26
58,15542,53926,92411,308−4,308days0d1,167d0d161dFY15FY22FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹188 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹10.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹187 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹75.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹187 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
202151101500₹ Cr₹75₹187FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
202151101500₹ Cr₹75₹187FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −143% in FY19. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −3.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −3.1% net margin on 0.16× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY19 trough of −143% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −3.1% net margin × 0.16× asset turns × −10.61× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 5.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 8.6% − 12.0% = a −3.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 10% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY19's −143%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
45%−5.8%−56%−107%−157%%9.6%−44.4%FY14FY20FY26
45%−5.8%−56%−107%−157%%9.6%−44.4%FY14FY20FY26
Q2 FY26: ROCE −32.3% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
1,343%776%209%−357%−924%%−32.3%7.1%Q4 FY21Q4 FY23Q3 FY26
1,343%776%209%−357%−924%%−32.3%7.1%Q4 FY21Q4 FY23Q3 FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 17.33 in FY21 to −3.58 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Dec 25: total debt of ₹8.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−51.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −0.16. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 17.33 (FY21) to −3.58 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt ₹186 Cr at −3.58× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
37695.1×28265.8×18836.5×947.2×0−22.1×₹ Cr×₹186−3.58×FY21FY23FY25
37695.1×28265.8×18836.5×947.2×0−22.1×₹ Cr×₹186−3.58×FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: debt ₹8.0 Cr, debt-to-equity −0.16 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
2010.9×151−3.1×100−7.1×50−11.1×0−15.1×₹ Cr×₹8−0.16×Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
2010.9×151−3.1×100−7.1×50−11.1×0−15.1×₹ Cr×₹8−0.16×Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 1.1 points of Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 0.5% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −0.1 points over the same window, to 10.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −1.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.5%; Domestic institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 10.9%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 50.0%.

🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−1.1 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
54%40%25%11%−3.2%%50.0%0.7%10.9%38.3%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
54%40%25%11%−3.2%%50.0%0.7%10.9%38.3%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Foreign institutions cut 1.1 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
54%40%25%11%−3.7%%50.0%0.5%10.9%38.5%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
54%40%25%11%−3.7%%50.0%0.5%10.9%38.5%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd: the Z-score reads 2.16. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.16 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.16.

14 · Related companies · Mining/Minerals
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1South West Pinnacle Exploration LtdSOUTHWEST 79.6/100Favorable setup87% evidence ASLEEP 30.6/35 Revenue 39.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9.8 pp 95% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 20% · OPM 24.2% 95% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 19.5× · PEG — 50% evidence 17.5/20 RS sector 12.3% · RS bench 20.7% · 1Y 67.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.6 + 19.3 + 12.2 + 17.5 = 79.6 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Vedanta LtdVEDL 60.9/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence FADING 21.2/35 Revenue 2% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change 8 pp 95% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 16.1% · OPM 35% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 50% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 64.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 15.6 + 10.3 + 13.8 = 60.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Ashapura Minechem LtdASHAPURMIN 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence72% evidence TURNING 22.8/35 Revenue 91.3% · PAT 43.8% · OPM change -9 pp 83% evidence 17.5/25 ROCE 20.7% · OPM 6% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 50% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y 28.4%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 17.5 + 11.1 + 9 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys LtdIMFA 57.5/100Mixed-positive evidence96% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue 10.3% · PAT 12.4% · OPM change 9 pp 88% evidence 16.1/25 ROCE 18.4% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG 1.08 100% evidence 12.4/20 RS sector 3.8% · RS bench 12.2% · 1Y 95.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 16.1 + 10.9 + 12.4 = 57.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Midwest Energy Ltd526570 50.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 21.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 1202.9 pp 62% evidence 3.6/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -55.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 14.9/20 RS sector 97.8% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y 192.3%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 3.6 + 10 + 14.9 = 50.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Coal India LtdCOALINDIA 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence ASLEEP 9.3/35 Revenue 6.1% · PAT -5.9% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence 21.2/25 ROCE 35.3% · OPM 26% 76% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 8.2× · PEG — 50% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 8.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.3 + 21.2 + 11.6 + 8.2 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
720 Microns Ltd20MICRONS 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 14.3/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence 17.6/25 ROCE 17.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 10× · PEG — 50% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -40.9% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -28.3%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.3 + 17.6 + 12.2 + 5 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Deccan Gold Mines LtdDECNGOLD 44.9/100Mixed-negative evidence62% evidence TURNING 21.5/35 Revenue 71.5% · PAT -50.8% · OPM change 4492.4 pp 83% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -13.1% · OPM -13.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 48.9% · 1Y 50.5%7 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 3.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 44.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9KIOCL LtdKIOCL 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence ASLEEP 20.7/35 Revenue 4.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 31 pp 65% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 14% 100% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 1341× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 7.4%7 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 6.2 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltdthis pageORISSAMINE 38.9/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence ASLEEP 17.1/35 Revenue 45.7% · PAT 92.8% · OPM change 511.5 pp 62% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM -32.2% 95% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y -19.5%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 8 + 10 + 3.8 = 38.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation LtdGMDCLTD 38.1/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence ASLEEP 14.6/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 21% 100% evidence 8.0/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG 1.28 100% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y 29.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.6 + 11.2 + 8 + 4.3 = 38.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12MOIL LtdMOIL 29.5/100Adverse evidence77% evidence ASLEEP 6.3/35 Revenue -20.4% · PAT -80% · OPM change -28.5 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 11.4% · OPM 20.5% 95% evidence 7.3/20 P/E 55× · PEG — 50% evidence 4.1/20 RS sector -29.2% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y -25.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 6.3 + 11.8 + 7.3 + 4.1 = 29.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Bharat Coking Coal LtdBHARATCOAL 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence FADING 11.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -6.8 pp 45% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 4% · OPM -1.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —8 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 11.3 + 6.5 + 10 + 10 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's share price today?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd trades at ₹3,986, −17.2% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,392 Cr. The stock sits at 29% of its 52-week range of ₹3,307–₹5,657, −7.4% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 80 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹29.0 Cr and a net loss of ₹7.6 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−12.68. The operating margin was −32.2%, 511.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's revenue?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd reported revenue of ₹29.0 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +331.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹94.1 Cr (+45.6%). — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's profit?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd earned ₹−7.6 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−2.9 Cr. The operating margin ran −32.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's market cap?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,392 Cr at a share price of ₹3,986. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's P/E ratio?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd trades at a P/E of 987.6×, at the 92nd percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 335.6×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 4 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 987.6× sits at the 92nd percentile of its 10-year range (long-run median 335.6×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd performing?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd is in a downtrend, 80 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 8 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 80 of stage 4), trading −7.4% versus its 200-day average and at 29% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (8 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +145% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹3,986, the price is in a downtrend 80 weeks in. Its P/E of 987.6× sits at the 92nd percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd?

Promoters hold 50.0% of Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd, foreign institutions 0.5%, domestic institutions 10.9% and the public 38.5% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions cut 1.1 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd have too much debt?

No — Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's debt-to-equity is −3.88, and operating profit covers the interest bill 1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹212 Cr against equity of ₹−54.6 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's capex?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd spent ₹188 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹75.0 Cr, with ₹187 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's cash flow?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd generated ₹35.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−40.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹75.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−2.9 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, −583% of Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹35.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−2.9 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

How financially safe is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.16 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd in its business cycle?

Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 9.7%, against a 5-year band of −43.3%–30.7%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −32.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −583% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI