Midwest Energy Ltd
526570Midwest Energy Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −13.6 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (107 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving. What settles it: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Midwest Energy Ltd trades at ₹3,435, in a confirmed uptrend and 107 weeks into that stage. That is −7.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 41% of a 52-week range of ₹1,898 to ₹5,681. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (7 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 107 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹3,435 it trades −7.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 41% of its 52-week range (₹1,898–₹5,681).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +31,129% while the NIFTY 500 moved +259% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-01) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price Midwest Energy Ltd — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values Midwest Energy Ltd at 495.1× its FY26 revenue of ₹9.0 Cr.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Midwest Energy Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +800.0% | +72.6% | +89.3% | +8.3% |
| Share price | +98.0% | +370.5% | +184.3% | +76.7% |
4-Factor Sector Score
48.7/100 — rank 6 of 13 in Mining/Minerals · 58% evidence confidence
Midwest Energy Ltd scores 48.7 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in Mining/Minerals, ranking 6. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.3 + 4.1 + 10 + 12.3 = 48.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Midwest Energy Ltd reported ₹6.2 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +1,173.5% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.3% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹9.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹14.4 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹9.0 Cr (+800.0% on the year), capping 10 years at 8.3% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹6.2 Cr, +1,173.5% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4,180.8% growth against the decade's 8.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +1,448.4% over the last 4 quarters against +324.3%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Midwest Energy Ltd's operating margin is −7.4% in the Jun 26 quarter, +547.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −1,175.0% to −21.3%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −7.4%, +547.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −1,175.0%–−21.3%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +547.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −45.2 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Midwest Energy Ltd posted a net loss of ₹1.0 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹14.0 Cr. That loss is 16.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹3.8 Cr. 12 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹−1.0 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−14.0 Cr (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Midwest Energy Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹−10.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−14.0 Cr of profit. After ₹201 Cr of capital spending, ₹−211 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−10.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−14.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−211 Cr after ₹201 Cr of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 76.8× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Midwest Energy Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 2,675 days in FY26, down from 4,305 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹307 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹9.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr, so roughly ₹66.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 299 days, inventory at 2,449 days — roughly 80.6 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 2,675 days, tighter than FY21's 4,305.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 2,449 days to sell; customers pay about 299 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 72 days — netting out to the 2,675-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹9.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr — so the 2,675-day loop keeps roughly ₹66.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹307 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹4.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹164 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Midwest Energy Ltd earns a ROCE of −3% in FY26. That is up from a trough of −456% in FY14. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is −155.6% net margin on 0.01× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is −3%, recovered from a FY14 trough of −456% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −155.6% net margin × 0.01× asset turns × 1.78× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −2.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Midwest Energy Ltd carries ₹302 Cr of borrowings against ₹401 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.75. Operating profit covers the interest bill −3×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹17.8 Cr to ₹302 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹307 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹302 Cr against equity of ₹401 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.75. Operating profit covers the interest bill −3×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹17.8 Cr to ₹302 Cr while capital spending ran ₹307 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Promoters cut 13.6 points of Midwest Energy Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 58.5% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +12.6 points over the same window, to 12.6%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Promoters: −13.6 points over 8 quarters to 58.5%; Foreign institutions: +12.6 points over 8 quarters to 12.6%; Domestic institutions: +0.9 points over 8 quarters to 1.6%.
🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−13.6 points), absorbed on the other side by foreign institutions (+12.6 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Midwest Energy Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1South West Pinnacle Exploration LtdSOUTHWEST | 75.5/100Favorable setup87% evidence | ASLEEP | 30.3/35 Revenue 39.2% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9.8 pp 95% evidence | 19.0/25 ROCE 20% · OPM 24.2% 95% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 18× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y 51%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 30.3 + 19 + 12.3 + 13.9 = 75.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys LtdIMFA | 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue 23.6% · PAT 46.6% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 18.4% · OPM 29% 100% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG 1.4 100% evidence | 10.9/20 RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 6.2% · 1Y 91.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 16.4 + 9.3 + 10.9 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Vedanta LtdVEDL | 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.2/35 Revenue 2% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change 8 pp 95% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 16.1% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 50% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 71.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 15.4 + 10.3 + 13 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Ashapura Minechem LtdASHAPURMIN | 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence76% evidence | FADING | 20.2/35 Revenue 62.6% · PAT 19.5% · OPM change -2 pp 95% evidence | 18.0/25 ROCE 20.7% · OPM 11% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 50% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y 14.6%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 18 + 11.1 + 5.7 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Deccan Gold Mines LtdDECNGOLD | 50.6/100Thin evidence · provisional54% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 26.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 58.7% · OPM change 4414.3 pp 71% evidence | 5.3/25 ROCE -13.1% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 64.4% · 1Y 74.3%8 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.2 + 5.3 + 10 + 9.1 = 50.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Midwest Energy Ltdthis page526570 | 48.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -80% · OPM change 547.7 pp 71% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -2.5% · OPM -7.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 97.8% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y 114.3%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 4.1 + 10 + 12.3 = 48.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 720 Microns Ltd20MICRONS | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 13.1/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT 11.5% · OPM change 0 pp 95% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 17.3% · OPM 13% 95% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 9.9× · PEG — 50% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -40.9% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y -17.7%8 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 17.6 + 12.2 + 4.6 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8MOIL LtdMOIL | 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence97% evidence | BASING | 13.2/35 Revenue 4.9% · PAT 7.8% · OPM change 14 pp 95% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 37% 95% evidence | 12.7/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG 0.68 100% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -22.8% · RS bench -16% · 1Y -15%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.2 + 13.2 + 12.7 + 7.6 = 46.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Coal India LtdCOALINDIA | 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.8/35 Revenue 6.1% · PAT -5.9% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 20.7/25 ROCE 35% · OPM 26% 76% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -11.8% · RS bench -5.1% · 1Y 7.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.8 + 20.7 + 11.6 + 7.4 = 46.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10KIOCL LtdKIOCL | 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence68% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.0/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 29 pp 74% evidence | 3.7/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM -17% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 609× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 12.8%5 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24 + 3.7 + 8.5 + 8.1 = 44.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Orissa Minerals Development Company LtdORISSAMINE | 42.5/100Thin evidence · provisional59% evidence | TURNING | 17.1/35 Revenue 45.7% · PAT 92.8% · OPM change 511.5 pp 62% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM -32.2% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.6/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 3.4%2 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 7.8 + 10 + 7.6 = 42.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation LtdGMDCLTD | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT 43.5% · OPM change -2 pp 100% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 21% 100% evidence | 7.6/20 P/E 32.4× · PEG 1.28 100% evidence | 6.5/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y 44.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 10.8 + 7.6 + 6.5 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Bharat Coking Coal LtdBHARATCOAL | 37.2/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -6.8 pp 45% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 4% · OPM -1.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —6 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 6.5 + 10 + 10 = 37.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's share price today?
Midwest Energy Ltd trades at ₹3,435, +98.0% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹4,456 Cr. The stock sits at 41% of its 52-week range of ₹1,898–₹5,681, −7.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 107 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Midwest Energy Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Midwest Energy Ltd reported revenue of ₹6.2 Cr and a net loss of ₹1.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−0.79. The operating margin was −7.4%, 547.7 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's revenue?
Midwest Energy Ltd reported revenue of ₹6.2 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +1,173.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹9.0 Cr (+800.0%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 8.3% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's profit?
Midwest Energy Ltd earned ₹−1.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−14.0 Cr. The operating margin ran −7.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's market cap?
Midwest Energy Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹4,456 Cr at a share price of ₹3,435. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Midwest Energy Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Midwest Energy Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Midwest Energy Ltd performing?
Midwest Energy Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 107 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Midwest Energy Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 107 of stage 2), trading −7.2% versus its 200-day average and at 41% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Midwest Energy Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Midwest Energy Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-01), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +31,129% against the NIFTY 500's +259% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Midwest Energy Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Midwest Energy Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹3,435, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 107 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Midwest Energy Ltd?
Promoters hold 58.5% of Midwest Energy Ltd, foreign institutions 12.6%, domestic institutions 1.6% and the public 27.4% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 13.6 points over 8 quarters. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Midwest Energy Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Midwest Energy Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.75, and operating profit covers the interest bill −3×. FY26 borrowings were ₹302 Cr against equity of ₹401 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's capex?
Midwest Energy Ltd spent ₹307 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹201 Cr, with ₹164 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Midwest Energy Ltd's cash flow?
Midwest Energy Ltd consumed ₹10.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−211 Cr). Reported profit that year was ₹−14.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Midwest Energy Ltd in its business cycle?
Midwest Energy Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −115.0%, against a 13-year band of −1,175.0%–−21.3%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran −7.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Midwest Energy Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: Promoters moved −13.6 points over 8 quarters while the operating story went the other way — someone close to the numbers is not convinced. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Midwest Energy Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Midwest Energy Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the register turns back in the story’s favour. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.