Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Latham Group, Inc.

SWIM
Industrials · Building Products & Equipment

Latham Group, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

Biggest watch item: margins are the best this company has ever printed — every ratio flatters at record profitability, so the whole story leans on margins holding.

The price is in a downtrend (11 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed, and 300% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Price
$5.7
−15.2% 1Y
P/E
125.1×
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.1 B
+9.1% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$−0.0 B
Operating margin
−8.3%
−8.3 pp YoY
ROE
1%
FY25
ROIC
3.3%
vs WACC 10.5% → −7.2 pp
Cash conversion
300%
of profit, last 2 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Latham Group, Inc. trades at $5.7, in a downtrend and 11 weeks into that stage. That is −8.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 27% of a 52-week range of $5 to $8. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (5 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 11 of stage 4. At $5.7 it trades −8.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 27% of its 52-week range ($5–$8).

Aug 26: $5.7 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−8.2% versus the 200-day line, week 11 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S2S1S2S1S4$8.7$7.0$5.2$3.4$1.6$$6$6Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S4S2S1S2S1S4$8.7$7.0$5.2$3.4$1.6$$6$6Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2021 Each cell is one week from 2021 to now (276 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Apr 21Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 5.3 years the stock moved −78% while the S&P 500 moved +85% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-02) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Latham Group, Inc. trades at 125.1× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 125.1× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 125.1× vs a null× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 3.8-year window; loss-period spikes above 126× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
133.6×$0.10105.9×$0.0778.2×$0.0550.5×$0.0222.8×$0.00×$81.43×$0Oct 22Apr 23Oct 24Jan 26Aug 26
133.6×$0.10105.9×$0.0778.2×$0.0550.5×$0.0222.8×$0.00×$81.43×$0Oct 22Oct 24Aug 26
PEG 5.76 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 18 quarters; values above 6 pinned at the top.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
6.5×4.9×3.2×1.6×0.0××5.76×Dec 21Dec 22Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
6.5×4.9×3.2×1.6×0.0××5.76×Dec 21Dec 23Mar 26
P/E
125.1×
too little history to rank
PEG
4.63
derived from 3-year earnings growth

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Latham Group, Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +7.8% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoY
13%−98.8%4.9%−99.4%−3.8%−100.0%−12%−100.6%−21%−101.2%%%7.8%−100%FY21FY23FY25
13%−98.8%4.9%−99.4%−3.8%−100.0%−12%−100.6%−21%−101.2%%%7.8%−100%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
10.0%132%2.1%16%−5.7%−100%−14%−216%−21%−332%%%7.8%100%−211.1%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
10.0%132%2.1%16%−5.7%−100%−14%−216%−21%−332%%%7.8%100%−211.1%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
4.4%3.2%2.0%0.9%−0.3%%2.7%Jul 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
4.4%3.2%2.0%0.9%−0.3%%2.7%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Stuck low
latest +7.8% · span −19.2% to +7.8%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 2.7% · span 0.0%–4.1%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+7.8%−7.7%
Profit−20.6%
Stock price−15.2%+14.1%−22.6%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+9.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−3.3%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

33.9/100 — rank 27 of 29 in Building Products & Equipment · 64% evidence confidence

Latham Group, Inc. scores 33.9 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Building Products & Equipment, ranking 27. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.1 + 4.3 + 8.8 + 4.7 = 33.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Latham Group, Inc. reported $0.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +9.1% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at −3.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.6 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.6 B (+7.8% on the year), capping 4 years at −3.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.1 B, +9.1% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $0.6 B (+7.8% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−3.3% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
0.813%0.64.9%0.4−3.8%0.2−12%0.0−21%$ B%$1B7.8%FY21FY23FY25
0.813%0.64.9%0.4−3.8%0.2−12%0.0−21%$ B%$1B7.8%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.1 B (+9.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.1914%0.154.3%0.10−5.2%0.05−15%0.00−24%$ B%$0B9.1%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.1914%0.154.3%0.10−5.2%0.05−15%0.00−24%$ B%$0B9.1%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +8.3% growth against the decade's −3.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +7.8% over the last 4 quarters against +0.9%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Latham Group, Inc.'s operating margin is −8.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, −8.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −6.3% to 5.5%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −8.3%, −8.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −6.3%–5.5%, and FY25's 5.5% is the top of that band — a record year.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −8.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +6.0 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

FY25: 5.5% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
the widest a −6.3–5.5% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
6.4%12%3.0%8.2%−0.4%4.9%−3.8%1.6%−7.2%−1.7%%%5.5%1.6%FY21FY23FY25
6.4%12%3.0%8.2%−0.4%4.9%−3.8%1.6%−7.2%−1.7%%%5.5%1.6%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: −8.3% operating margin (−8.3 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
14%8.3%7.5%3.9%0.7%−0.6%−6.1%−5.1%−13%−9.5%%%−8.3%−8.3%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
14%8.3%7.5%3.9%0.7%−0.6%−6.1%−5.1%−13%−9.5%%%−8.3%−8.3%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Latham Group, Inc. posted a net loss of $0.01 B in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That loss is 8.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.01 B. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (null).

FY25 profit $0.0 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.03−98.8%0.00−99.4%−0.03−100.0%−0.05−100.6%−0.08−101.2%$ B%$0B−100%FY21FY23FY25
0.03−98.8%0.00−99.4%−0.03−100.0%−0.05−100.6%−0.08−101.2%$ B%$0B−100%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $−0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.02108%0.0179%0.0050%−0.0121%−0.02−8.0%$ B%$0B100%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.02108%0.0179%0.0050%−0.0121%−0.02−8.0%$ B%$0B100%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 2 fiscal years 300% of Latham Group, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $0.0 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $0.0 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 300% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.1 B vs profit $0.0 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
300% of 2-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.140.080.02−0.03−0.09$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.140.080.02−0.03−0.09$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $−0.1 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.06532%0.03416%0.00300%−0.03184%−0.0668%$ B%$−0B250%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.06532%0.03416%0.00300%−0.03184%−0.0668%$ B%$−0B250%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Latham Group, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.0 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.040.030.020.010.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.040.030.020.010.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.0110.060.0080.030.0050.000.003−0.040.000−0.07$ B$ B$0B$−0BJul 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.0110.060.0080.030.0050.000.003−0.040.000−0.07$ B$ B$0B$−0BJul 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Latham Group, Inc. earns a ROE of 2% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −20% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −7.2 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 1.8% net margin on 0.67× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 2%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −20% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 1.8% net margin × 0.67× asset turns × 2.00× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 2.4% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 3.3% − 10.5% = a −7.2 pp spread. The 10.5% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE 2% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 10.5% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY21's −20%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
13%4.1%−4.8%−14%−22%%2.4%3.9%FY21FY23FY25
13%4.1%−4.8%−14%−22%%2.4%3.9%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC 4.4% (TTM) vs WACC 10.5% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
12%6.5%1.0%−4.5%−10%%4.4%3.5%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
12%6.5%1.0%−4.5%−10%%4.4%3.5%Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Latham Group, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Latham Group, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Latham Group, Inc. carries total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.4 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.85. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.80 in FY21 to 0.76 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $0.3 B against shareholder equity of $0.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.85. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.80 (FY21) to 0.76 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $0.3 B at 0.76× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
0.40.93×0.30.89×0.20.84×0.10.79×0.00.75×$ B×$0B0.76×FY21FY23FY25
0.40.93×0.30.89×0.20.84×0.10.79×0.00.75×$ B×$0B0.76×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $0.3 B, debt-to-equity 0.85 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
0.40.91×0.30.87×0.20.82×0.10.77×0.00.73×$ B×$0B0.85×Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.40.91×0.30.87×0.20.82×0.10.77×0.00.73×$ B×$0B0.85×Jul 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

7.9% of Latham Group, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 5.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 7.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 5.0 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
7.9%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
5.0
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Latham Group, Inc.: the Z-score reads 1.81. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.81 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.81.

15 · Related companies · Building Products & Equipment
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Masco CorporationMAS 64.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 21.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence 17.8/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 16.5% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 5.3% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 11.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 17.8 + 11 + 14 = 64.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Carlisle Companies IncorporatedCSL 61.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 45% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 17.1% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.5/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y 5.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 15.6 + 10.6 + 15.5 = 61.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Apogee Enterprises, Inc.APOG 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence TURNING 20.8/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT 37.3% · OPM change 3.5 pp 71% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence 15.8/20 P/E 12× · PEG 0.33 65% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 4% · RS bench -1.6% · 1Y 2.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.8 + 9.3 + 15.8 + 13.2 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Trex Company, Inc.TREX 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.0/35 Revenue 5.3% · PAT -3.5% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 24.3% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 20.3× · PEG 1.98 65% evidence 14.2/20 RS sector 2.5% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y -21.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 16.4 + 9.2 + 14.2 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Johnson Controls International plcJCI 57.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.1 pp 45% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 60.6% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 25.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 13.9% · RS bench 8.9% · 1Y 45.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 13.4 + 10.3 + 15.4 = 57.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Arlo Technologies, Inc.ARLO 54.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 23.2/35 Revenue 10.7% · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 62% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 5% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 47.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench -2.4% · 1Y -4.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.2 + 9.4 + 9.5 + 12.5 = 54.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Griffon CorporationGFF 54.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence FADING 14.0/35 Revenue -0.8% · PAT -71.7% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 20.7% 76% evidence 12.6/20 P/E 559.1× · PEG 0.54 65% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 3.4% · 1Y 34.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 13.5 + 12.6 + 14 = 54.1 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8Armstrong World Industries, Inc.AWI 53.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.7 pp 45% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 8% · OPM 23% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 22× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -2.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 16.6 + 10.5 + 8.7 = 53.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Trane Technologies plcTT 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.9 pp 45% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 8.2% · OPM 15.6% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 37.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y 9.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 16 + 9.7 + 9 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.FBIN 49.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.7/35 Revenue -2% · PAT -36.5% · OPM change -3.4 pp 83% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 6% 76% evidence 13.6/20 P/E 17× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence 13.5/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -4.2% · 1Y -5.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.7 + 9.8 + 13.6 + 13.5 = 49.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -4.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11SPX Technologies, Inc.SPXC 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 45% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 15.5% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 41.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -2.7% · RS bench -7.3% · 1Y 7.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 13.4 + 9.6 + 5.8 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12NPK International Inc.NPKI 48.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.7 pp 45% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 19.2% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -3.3% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y 46.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.4 + 9.9 + 7.6 = 48.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13AirJoule Technologies CorporationAIRJ 46.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence LEADER 12.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -249% · OPM change — 57% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 8.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 37.7% · RS bench 30% · 1Y 30.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12 + 5.7 + 11.4 + 17 = 46.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Lennox International Inc.LII 44.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.3 pp 45% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 13.3% · OPM 14.4% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 25.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.2/20 RS sector -18% · RS bench -22.3% · 1Y -23.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 17.7 + 10.2 + 1.2 = 44.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Owens CorningOC 44.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 9.1/35 Revenue -5.1% · PAT -308.2% · OPM change -10.8 pp 62% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 5.3% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 35.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.1/20 RS sector 9.4% · RS bench 3.3% · 1Y 1.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.1 + 7 + 9.8 + 18.1 = 44 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
16AAON, Inc.AAON 43.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 22.9/35 Revenue 28.2% · PAT -25.8% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 11.5% 76% evidence 4.6/20 P/E 57.9× · PEG 4.21 65% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -12.5% · 1Y 18.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 13.4 + 4.6 + 3 = 43.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -8.3% and the one-year return is 18.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
17Carrier Global CorporationCARR 43.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 15.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.3 pp 45% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 50.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.8/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y -0.5%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.8 + 9.8 + 9.4 + 8.8 = 43.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Quanex Building Products CorporationNX 43.4/100Mixed-negative evidence69% evidence BASING 10.3/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT -8166.7% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 4% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 27.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 14% · RS bench 8.1% · 1Y 6.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 6.5 + 10.1 + 16.5 = 43.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
19Limbach Holdings, Inc.LMB 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 15.5/35 Revenue 22.5% · PAT 0% · OPM change -5.1 pp 83% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 0.8% 76% evidence 12.1/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG 0.94 65% evidence 7.4/20 RS sector -13.8% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y -32.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 7.3 + 12.1 + 7.4 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Aspen Aerogels, Inc.ASPN 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.0/35 Revenue -47.4% · PAT — · OPM change 325.2 pp 62% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -5.2% · OPM -55% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 69.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.2/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -33%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 3 + 8.9 + 9.2 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.PPIH 39.8/100Mixed-negative evidence79% evidence BASING 15.6/35 Revenue 24.4% · PAT 5.9% · OPM change -7.7 pp 95% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 9.2% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 19.3× · PEG 2 65% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -20.3% · 1Y -2.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 10.7 + 8.8 + 4.7 = 39.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
22Janus International Group, Inc.JBI 38.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 13.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.9 pp 45% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 5.9% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 15.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -21.4% · RS bench -26.7% · 1Y -42.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 8.3 + 11.2 + 5.8 = 38.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Gibraltar Industries, Inc.ROCK 36.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence TURNING 12.3/35 Revenue 21.1% · PAT -54.1% · OPM change -12.9 pp 83% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -1.3% 76% evidence 11.7/20 P/E 314× · PEG 0.92 65% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -8.4% · RS bench -14% · 1Y -17.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 6.8 + 11.7 + 5.7 = 36.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.JELD 35.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence 20.1/35 Revenue -12.1% · PAT — · OPM change 16.2 pp 62% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE -3.3% · OPM -7.6% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 57.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -58.7% · RS bench -62.8% · 1Y -77.3%4 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 3.5 + 9.3 + 3 = 35.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Builders FirstSource, Inc.BLDR 35.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 14.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.5 pp 45% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 0.5% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 98.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.2/20 RS sector -29.7% · RS bench -34.2% · 1Y -43%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.1 + 8.5 + 8.7 + 4.2 = 35.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Louisiana-Pacific CorporationLPX 34.8/100Adverse evidence81% evidence BASING 6.0/35 Revenue -13% · PAT -79% · OPM change -10.7 pp 83% evidence 8.8/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 5.9% 76% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 62.2× · PEG 0.28 65% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -11.4% · RS bench -16.3% · 1Y -15.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 6 + 8.8 + 14 + 6 = 34.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
27Latham Group, Inc.this pageSWIM 33.9/100Adverse evidence64% evidence BASING 16.1/35 Revenue 8.7% · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 62% evidence 4.3/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -5.6% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 75.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -16.6% · RS bench -21.4% · 1Y -22.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 4.3 + 8.8 + 4.7 = 33.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.WMS 33.7/100Adverse evidence81% evidence TURNING 12.3/35 Revenue 5% · PAT -5.4% · OPM change -11.1 pp 83% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 7.9% 76% evidence 5.4/20 P/E 25.2× · PEG 4.38 65% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench -8.5% · 1Y 14%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 10.9 + 5.4 + 5.1 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Madison Air Solutions CorporationMAIR 54.8/100Thin evidence · provisional27% evidence ASLEEP 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.4 pp 13% evidence 15.0/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 16.4% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —0 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 15 + 11.5 + 10 = 54.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s stock price today?

Latham Group, Inc. trades at $5.7, −15.2% over the past year. The company is valued at $1.0 B. The stock sits at 27% of its 52-week range of $5–$8, −8.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 11 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Latham Group, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

Latham Group, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.07. The operating margin was −8.3%, 8.3 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s revenue?

Latham Group, Inc. reported revenue of $0.1 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +9.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.6 B (+7.8%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −3.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s profit?

Latham Group, Inc. earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran −8.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s market cap?

Latham Group, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $1.0 B at a stock price of $5.7. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Latham Group, Inc. pay a dividend?

No — Latham Group, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Latham Group, Inc. performing?

Latham Group, Inc. is in a downtrend, 11 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 5 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Latham Group, Inc. in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 11 of stage 4), trading −8.2% versus its 200-day average and at 27% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Latham Group, Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Latham Group, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (5 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-02), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 5.3 years the stock moved −78% against the S&P 500's +85% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Latham Group, Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Latham Group, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $5.7, the price is in a downtrend 11 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against Latham Group, Inc.?

Somewhat — short interest is 7.9% of Latham Group, Inc.'s tradable float, about 5.0 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Latham Group, Inc. have too much debt?

It is moderate — Latham Group, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.76. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s capex?

Latham Group, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Latham Group, Inc.'s cash flow?

Latham Group, Inc. generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Latham Group, Inc.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 300% of Latham Group, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Latham Group, Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.81 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Latham Group, Inc. in its business cycle?

Latham Group, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 5.5%, against a 5-year band of −6.3%–5.5%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran −8.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Latham Group, Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: margins are the best this company has ever printed — every ratio flatters at record profitability, so the whole story leans on margins holding. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Latham Group, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Latham Group, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI