Neogen Corporation
NEOGNeogen Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 83rd percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (15 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 83rd percentile of its own 3-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating, and 136% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Neogen Corporation trades at $11.8, in a confirmed uptrend and 15 weeks into that stage. That is +35.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 97% of a 52-week range of $5 to $12. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 15 of stage 2. At $11.8 it trades +35.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 97% of its 52-week range ($5–$12).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved −46% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Neogen Corporation trades at 1,507.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (83rd percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 404.1×, measured across 2.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 1,507.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (83rd percentile), against a long-run median of 404.1× measured over 2.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Neogen Corporation reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −3.3% | +18.9% | — | — |
| Stock price | +153.4% | −19.7% | −23.0% | −5.5% |
4-Factor Sector Score
46.7/100 — rank 15 of 30 in Medical Devices · 58% evidence confidence
Neogen Corporation scores 46.7 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Medical Devices, ranking 15. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 13.9 = 46.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Neogen Corporation reported $0.2 B of revenue in the Feb 26 quarter, −4.5% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 17.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.9 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.9 B (−3.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 17.3% compound. The latest quarter (Feb 26) printed $0.2 B, −4.5% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −4.4% growth against the decade's 17.3% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −4.4% over the last 4 quarters against −3.3%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Neogen Corporation's operating margin is 0.0% in the Feb 26 quarter, −4.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −119.1% to 14.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 0.0%, −4.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −119.1%–14.9%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −4.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −2.4 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Neogen Corporation posted a net loss of $0.02 B in the Feb 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $1.1 B. That loss is 9.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.01 B. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Feb 26 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−1.1 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 136% of Neogen Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $−1.1 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $−0.1 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $−1.1 B, leaving free cash of $−0.1 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 136% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Neogen Corporation does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Neogen Corporation earns a ROE of −53% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −12.8 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −122.5% net margin on 0.26× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −53%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −122.5% net margin × 0.26× asset turns × 1.66× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −52.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −0.8% − 12.0% = a −12.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend
Neogen Corporation pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Neogen Corporation does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Neogen Corporation carries total debt of $0.8 B against shareholder equity of $2.1 B as of May 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.38. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.00 in FY21 to 0.38 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
May 26: total debt of $0.8 B against shareholder equity of $2.1 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.38. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.00 (FY21) to 0.38 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
5.0% of Neogen Corporation's tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 5.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 5.0% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 5.4 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Neogen Corporation: the Z-score reads 0.93. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.93 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 0.93.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1DexCom, Inc.DXCM | 66.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.5 pp 45% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 21.4% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 12.9% · 1Y 10.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 16.8 + 9.9 + 16.5 = 66.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Globus Medical, Inc.GMED | 60.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.6/35 Revenue 23.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 83% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 19.8% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 20× · PEG 0.85 65% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y 39%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.6 + 14.8 + 15.2 + 4.7 = 60.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.1% and the one-year return is 39%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3LivaNova PLCLIVN | 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.7/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT — · OPM change 109.8 pp 62% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 18.6% · 1Y 74.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 11.1 + 9.5 + 12.5 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4UFP Technologies, Inc.UFPT | 56.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.7/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT 7.9% · OPM change -0.4 pp 83% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 6.5/20 P/E 22× · PEG 2.9 65% evidence | 18.9/20 RS sector 27.1% · RS bench 34.5% · 1Y 62.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 15.2 + 6.5 + 18.9 = 56.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 34.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 5STERIS plcSTE | 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 22.3/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 27.4% · OPM change 5.3 pp 83% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence | 12.8/20 P/E 27.9× · PEG 1 65% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -12% · 1Y -4.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 14.8 + 12.8 + 6.2 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Edwards Lifesciences CorporationEW | 55.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 45% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 8.5% · OPM 29% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 52× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 14.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 17.9 + 9 + 6.6 = 55.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.ESTA | 52.5/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.0/35 Revenue 35.3% · PAT — · OPM change 30.1 pp 62% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -10.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 22.8% · RS bench 29.8% · 1Y 171.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25 + 3.6 + 10 + 13.9 = 52.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Butterfly Network, Inc.BFLY | 52.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | LEADER | 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 34.7 pp 45% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -5.5% · OPM -52.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 88.6% · RS bench 99.8% · 1Y 562.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 3.1 + 10 + 20 = 52.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Stryker CorporationSYK | 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 45% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 15.5% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -14% · 1Y -11%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 15.6 + 9.4 + 7.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Boston Scientific CorporationBSX | 52.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 45% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 21.2% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.7/20 RS sector -46.8% · RS bench -43.8% · 1Y -52.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 17 + 11.2 + 1.7 = 52.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Integer Holdings CorporationITGR | 51.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 13.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.3 pp 45% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 7.2% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 25.5% · 1Y 17.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 10.1 + 10.8 + 17.7 = 51.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.ZBH | 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 16.9/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -16.9% · OPM change 2.6 pp 83% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 17.9% 76% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 23.5× · PEG 1.09 65% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -8% · 1Y -3.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 12.1 + 12.3 + 7.4 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Glaukos CorporationGKOS | 48.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -13.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 28% · RS bench 35.5% · 1Y 101.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 4.2 + 10 + 15.8 = 48.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Insulet CorporationPODD | 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 19.0/35 Revenue 31.9% · PAT -24.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 48.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -43.2% · RS bench -40% · 1Y -45.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 14.9 + 9.2 + 4.6 = 47.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Neogen Corporationthis pageNEOG | 46.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4 pp 45% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM -1.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1719× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 22.2% · RS bench 29.2% · 1Y 132.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 13.9 = 46.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.GEHC | 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.2 pp 45% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y -2.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 13.4 + 11.4 + 5.3 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Haemonetics CorporationHAE | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 5.4/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT -41.3% · OPM change -28.2 pp 83% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -6.6% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG 0.52 65% evidence | 17.3/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 58.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5.4 + 7 + 15.1 + 17.3 = 44.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 17%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Koninklijke Philips N.V.PHG | 44.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 45% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 6.2% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y -1.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 10.9 + 11 + 3 = 44.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Medtronic plcMDT | 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 18.1/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 3.1% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 19.1% 76% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 3.08 65% evidence | 5.1/20 RS sector -19.6% · RS bench -15% · 1Y -7.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 14.3 + 5.6 + 5.1 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20TransMedics Group, Inc.TMDX | 41.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 16.7/35 Revenue 30.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -11.5 pp 83% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 7.6% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -37.4% · RS bench -34.1% · 1Y -29.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 8.7 + 10.5 + 5.7 = 41.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Axogen, Inc.AXGN | 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | FADING | 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 5.6/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -4.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 25.1% · RS bench 32.6% · 1Y 230.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.6 + 10 + 13 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22iRhythm Holdings, Inc.IRTC | 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 22.9/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.6/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -22.6% · 1Y -19.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 4.6 + 10 + 2.8 = 40.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -26.9% and the one-year return is -19.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 23Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.INSP | 40.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 17.3/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 98.5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence | 4.3/20 RS sector -23.1% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -19%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 6.1 + 12.3 + 4.3 = 40 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24NovoCure LimitedNVCR | 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | FADING | 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -14.3 pp 45% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -38.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector 0.9% · RS bench 7.4% · 1Y 46.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 3.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Penumbra, Inc.PEN | 39.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 10.2% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 134.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y 34.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 11.5 + 8.6 + 4.9 = 39 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Abbott LaboratoriesABT | 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 7.9/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT -61.2% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence | 7.3/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG 2.31 65% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -21% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y -21.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.9 + 12.8 + 7.3 + 7.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Bruker CorporationBRKR | 34.5/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 8.0/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -112.7% · OPM change -2.8 pp 83% evidence | 9.2/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.2% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 79.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y 65.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8 + 9.2 + 8.8 + 8.5 = 34.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Enovis CorporationENOV | 46.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | TURNING | 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.5 pp 39% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.1% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 58.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.0/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 4% · 1Y 8.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 6.5 + 8.9 + 11 = 46 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Smith & Nephew plcSNN | 42.9/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BASING | 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 22.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.7/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y -15.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.4 + 10.3 + 2.7 = 42.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.BIO-B | 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | TURNING | 14.8/35 Revenue 1.9% · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 45.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 7.7 + 9.3 + 10 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Neogen Corporation's stock price today?
Neogen Corporation trades at $11.8, +153.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $3.0 B. The stock sits at 97% of its 52-week range of $5–$12, +35.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 15 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Neogen Corporation's latest quarterly results?
Neogen Corporation reported revenue of $0.2 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Feb 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.08. The operating margin was 0.0%, 4.5 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's revenue?
Neogen Corporation reported revenue of $0.2 B in the Feb 26 quarter, −4.5% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.9 B (−3.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 17.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's profit?
Neogen Corporation earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Feb 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−1.1 B. The operating margin ran 0.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's market cap?
Neogen Corporation's market capitalisation is $3.0 B at a stock price of $11.8. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's P/E ratio?
Neogen Corporation trades at a P/E of 1,507.0×, at the 83rd percentile of its own 3-year range, against a long-run median of 404.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Neogen Corporation pay a dividend?
No — Neogen Corporation has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Neogen Corporation overvalued?
On its own history, Neogen Corporation looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 1,507.0× sits at the 83rd percentile of its 3-year range (long-run median 404.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Neogen Corporation performing?
Neogen Corporation is in a confirmed uptrend, 15 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Neogen Corporation in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 15 of stage 2), trading +35.3% versus its 200-day average and at 97% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Neogen Corporation beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Neogen Corporation has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved −46% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Neogen Corporation's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Neogen Corporation. What it measures instead: the stock price is $11.8, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 15 weeks in. Its P/E of 1,507.0× sits at the 83rd percentile of its own 3-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Neogen Corporation?
Somewhat — short interest is 5.0% of Neogen Corporation's tradable float, about 5.4 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Neogen Corporation have too much debt?
It is moderate — Neogen Corporation's debt-to-equity is 0.39. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's capex?
Neogen Corporation spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Neogen Corporation's cash flow?
Neogen Corporation generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−1.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Neogen Corporation's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 136% of Neogen Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $−1.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Neogen Corporation?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 0.93 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Neogen Corporation in its business cycle?
Neogen Corporation's FY25 operating margin was −119.1%, against a 5-year band of −119.1%–14.9%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 0.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Neogen Corporation story?
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 83rd percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Neogen Corporation a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Neogen Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.