Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
BIOBio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is already 13 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (13 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed — profit −983.3% year on year, and 24% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. trades at $379, in a confirmed uptrend and 13 weeks into that stage. That is +24.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 94% of a 52-week range of $248 to $388. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 9 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 13 of stage 2. At $379 it trades +24.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 94% of its 52-week range ($248–$388).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +164% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 9 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. trades at 45.9× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 45.9× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +0.4% | −2.7% | — | — |
| Stock price | +33.4% | +0.2% | −13.6% | +9.0% |
4-Factor Sector Score
48.6/100 — rank 13 of 30 in Medical Devices · 64% evidence confidence
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. scores 48.6 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Medical Devices, ranking 13. Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 14.3 + 7.7 + 9.2 + 17.4 = 48.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. reported $0.6 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −3.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $2.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $2.6 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $2.6 B (+0.4% on the year), capping 4 years at −3.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.6 B, +0.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +1.1% growth against the decade's −3.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +1.2% over the last 4 quarters against −0.4%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s operating margin is 5.1% in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.9% to 17.1%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 5.1%, +1.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.9%–17.1%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. posted a net loss of $0.5 B in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.8 B. The 4-year compound rate is −35.0%. That loss is 89.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $−0.5 B, −983.3% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.8 B (null), and the 4-year compound rate is −35.0%.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 2 fiscal years 24% of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was $0.5 B of operating cash against $0.8 B of profit. After $0.2 B of capital spending, $0.4 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.8 B, leaving free cash of $0.4 B after $0.2 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 24% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. earns a ROE of 10% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −38% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −6.7 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 29.5% net margin on 0.24× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 10%, recovered from a FY22 trough of −38% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 29.5% net margin × 0.24× asset turns × 1.42× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 10.1% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 2.5% − 9.2% = a −6.7 pp spread. The 9.2% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. carries total debt of $1.4 B against shareholder equity of $6.8 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.20 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.02 in FY21 to 0.19 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of $1.4 B against shareholder equity of $6.8 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.20. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.02 (FY21) to 0.19 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
0.0% of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.2 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 0.0% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 4.2 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: the Z-score reads 3.19. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.19 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 3.19.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1DexCom, Inc.DXCM | 75.7/100Favorable setup85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 27.8/35 Revenue 15.5% · PAT 74.8% · OPM change 5.9 pp 95% evidence | 16.5/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 24.3% 76% evidence | 14.2/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG 0.68 65% evidence | 17.2/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y 29.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 27.8 + 16.5 + 14.2 + 17.2 = 75.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Boston Scientific CorporationBSX | 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BASING | 24.6/35 Revenue 13.5% · PAT 46.9% · OPM change 5.4 pp 95% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 21.6% 76% evidence | 16.2/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG 0.37 65% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -44.2% · RS bench -42.8% · 1Y -55.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 15.2 + 16.2 + 4.7 = 60.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -44.2% and the one-year return is -55.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3Globus Medical, Inc.GMED | 58.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.8/35 Revenue 23.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 83% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 19.8% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 20× · PEG 0.85 65% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y 34.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.8 + 14.6 + 14.7 + 3.7 = 58.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -16.8% and the one-year return is 34.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 4LivaNova PLCLIVN | 55.6/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.4/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT — · OPM change 109.8 pp 62% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y 42.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 10.4 + 9.5 + 11.3 = 55.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5STERIS plcSTE | 53.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | FADING | 21.6/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 27.4% · OPM change 5.3 pp 83% evidence | 14.5/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 27.9× · PEG 1 65% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -18.7% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y -15.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 14.5 + 12.5 + 5.3 = 53.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Stryker CorporationSYK | 53.6/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.4/35 Revenue 8.5% · PAT 27.8% · OPM change 6.7 pp 95% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 25.2% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -22.1% · 1Y -24.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 16.4 + 10.9 + 2.9 = 53.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -24.3% and the one-year return is -24.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 7Integer Holdings CorporationITGR | 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.3 pp 45% evidence | 10.0/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 7.2% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.1/20 RS sector 25.3% · RS bench 29.4% · 1Y 22.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 10 + 10.7 + 19.1 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8UFP Technologies, Inc.UFPT | 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 14.9/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT 7.9% · OPM change -0.4 pp 83% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 22× · PEG 2.9 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 12.4% · 1Y 44.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 14.9 + 6.8 + 15.7 = 52.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 12.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9Koninklijke Philips N.V.PHG | 51.8/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.2/35 Revenue -1.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 4.8 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 9% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 20.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -18.7% · RS bench -16.2% · 1Y -12%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 14.3 + 10.8 + 3.5 = 51.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.7% and the one-year return is -12%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10Neogen CorporationNEOG | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4 pp 45% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM -1.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1719× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 28% · RS bench 31.7% · 1Y 123.7%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 6.7 + 8.5 + 18.4 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.ZBH | 49.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.0/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -16.9% · OPM change 2.6 pp 83% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 17.9% 76% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 23.5× · PEG 1.09 65% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -5.1% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y -3.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 12 + 12.3 + 9.6 = 49.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Glaukos CorporationGKOS | 49.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | LEADER | 18.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -13.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 21% · RS bench 24.7% · 1Y 95.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 4.5 + 10 + 16.1 = 49.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.this pageBIO | 48.6/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.3/35 Revenue 1.9% · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 45.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 13.2% · RS bench 16.5% · 1Y 33.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.3 + 7.7 + 9.2 + 17.4 = 48.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 16.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14Insulet CorporationPODD | 47.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BASING | 18.9/35 Revenue 31.9% · PAT -24.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 16% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 48.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.4/20 RS sector -43.4% · RS bench -42% · 1Y -57.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 14.8 + 9 + 4.4 = 47.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Butterfly Network, Inc.BFLY | 46.9/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | FADING | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 34.7 pp 45% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -5.5% · OPM -52.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 40.2% · RS bench 44.6% · 1Y 292.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 3.1 + 10 + 14 = 46.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Medtronic plcMDT | 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.4/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 3.1% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 19.1% 76% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 3.08 65% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -4.7% · 1Y -2.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 13.7 + 6.1 + 9.4 = 46.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Haemonetics CorporationHAE | 46.5/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 5.0/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT -41.3% · OPM change -28.2 pp 83% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -6.6% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG 0.52 65% evidence | 19.5/20 RS sector 36.7% · RS bench 40.1% · 1Y 110%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5 + 7.3 + 14.7 + 19.5 = 46.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Edwards Lifesciences CorporationEW | 45.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 17.3/35 Revenue 14.6% · PAT -30.5% · OPM change 2.7 pp 95% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 29.5% 76% evidence | 3.9/20 P/E 52× · PEG 5.05 65% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -3.4% · RS bench -0.4% · 1Y 20%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 16.7 + 3.9 + 7.9 = 45.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 19Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.INSP | 45.8/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.3/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 98.5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 6.5/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -8.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 6.5 + 12.2 + 9.8 = 45.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.ESTA | 44.1/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.3/35 Revenue 35.3% · PAT — · OPM change 30.1 pp 62% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -10.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 80.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 4 + 10 + 4.8 = 44.1 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -6.5% and the one-year return is 80.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 21NovoCure LimitedNVCR | 43.9/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | TURNING | 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -14.3 pp 45% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -38.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 27.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 4.1 + 10 + 13.8 = 43.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22iRhythm Holdings, Inc.IRTC | 43.7/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 23.1/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 62% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.1% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -28% · RS bench -26.1% · 1Y -36.1%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 5 + 10 + 5.6 = 43.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -28% and the one-year return is -36.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 23TransMedics Group, Inc.TMDX | 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.9/35 Revenue 30.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -11.5 pp 83% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 7.6% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -25% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -28.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 8.6 + 10.3 + 6.4 = 42.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Alphatec Holdings, Inc.ATEC | 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.7/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT — · OPM change 14.4 pp 62% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -3.8% · OPM -11.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -27.5% · RS bench -26.2% · 1Y -32.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 3.6 + 10 + 3.8 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Axogen, Inc.AXGN | 40.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | FADING | 12.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 5.9/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -4.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 18.5% · RS bench 22.3% · 1Y 164.2%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 5.9 + 10 + 12.5 = 40.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Bruker CorporationBRKR | 39.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 7.9/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -112.7% · OPM change -2.8 pp 83% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.2% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 79.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 18.6% · RS bench 22.1% · 1Y 82.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.9 + 9.3 + 8.8 + 13 = 39 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 27GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.GEHC | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | FADING | 13.3/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT -11.5% · OPM change 0.9 pp 95% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG 3.4 65% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -15.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 13.6 + 6.7 + 5 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28Abbott LaboratoriesABT | 38.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 6.7/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT -61.4% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence | 6.2/20 P/E 29.3× · PEG 2.89 65% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y -24.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.7 + 16.4 + 6.2 + 8.9 = 38.2 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 29Penumbra, Inc.PEN | 38.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 45% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 10.2% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 134.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y 24.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 10.9 + 8.6 + 4.8 = 38.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Smith & Nephew plcSNN | 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -22.3% · RS bench -19.9% · 1Y -24.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 12.9 + 11 + 3 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s stock price today?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. trades at $379, +33.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $10.0 B. The stock sits at 94% of its 52-week range of $248–$388, +24.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.
What were Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. reported revenue of $0.6 B and a net loss of $0.5 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 0.0% and profit fell 983.3% year on year. Earnings per share were $−19.55. The operating margin was 5.1%, 1.7 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. reported revenue of $0.6 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $2.6 B (+0.4%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −3.0% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s profit?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. earned $−0.5 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −983.3% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.8 B. The operating margin ran 5.1% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s market cap?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $10.0 B at a stock price of $379. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. pay a dividend?
No — Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. growing?
The picture is mixed for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: latest-quarter revenue +0.0% year on year, profit −983.3%, and the margin +1.7 pp at 5.1%. The 4-year compound rates are −3.0% (revenue) and −35.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: mixed — as of 17 September 2026.
How is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. performing?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 0.0% and profit fell 983.3% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 9 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 13 of stage 2), trading +24.7% versus its 200-day average and at 94% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 9 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +164% against the S&P 500's +255% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.
Will Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $379, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 13 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is the market betting against Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.?
No — short interest is 0.0% of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s tradable float, about 4.2 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. have too much debt?
No — Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.19. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s capex?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.2 B. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s cash flow?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. generated $0.5 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.4 B of free cash flow after $0.2 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.8 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 2 fiscal years, 24% of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.8 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.
How financially safe is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 3.19 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 17 September 2026.
Where is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in its business cycle?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 1.9%, against a 5-year band of 1.9%–17.1%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 5.1%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.
What could break the Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. story?
Biggest watch item: the price is already 13 weeks into its uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!