Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Boston Scientific Corporation

BSX
Healthcare · Medical Devices

Boston Scientific Corporation's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +55.2% in a year against a −53.4% price move.

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +55.2% against a −53.4% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.

The price is in a downtrend (22 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 4th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +100.0% year on year, and 165% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.

Stage
Mixed
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$49.1
−53.4% 1Y
P/E
19.9×
4th pctile
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$5.2 B
+11.6% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$1.3 B
+100.0% YoY
Operating margin
21.2%
+1.5 pp YoY
ROE
15%
FY25
ROIC
11.2%
vs WACC 6.6% → +4.6 pp
Cash conversion
165%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Boston Scientific Corporation trades at $49.1, in a downtrend and 22 weeks into that stage. That is −32.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 8% of a 52-week range of $44 to $107. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (62 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 22 of stage 4. At $49.1 it trades −32.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 8% of its 52-week range ($44–$107).

Aug 26: $49.1 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−32.5% versus the 200-day line, week 22 of stage 4
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S2S1S4$112$94.0$75.6$57.3$39.0$$49$73Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S2S2S1S4$112$94.0$75.6$57.3$39.0$$49$73Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (527 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +105% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (62 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-05-30) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Boston Scientific Corporation trades at 19.9× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 68.2×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 19.9× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time, against a long-run median of 68.2× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

P/E 19.9× vs a 68.2× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 4.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 109× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 4% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
116.4×$2.690.1×$1.963.8×$1.337.5×$0.611.2×$0.0×$20.54×$2Apr 22Apr 23May 24Jul 25Aug 26
116.4×$2.690.1×$1.963.8×$1.337.5×$0.611.2×$0.0×$20.54×$2Apr 22May 24Aug 26
PEG 0.83 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 20 quarters.
below 1.0, the growth looks cheap against the multiple
PEGPEG = 1.0
3.2×2.5×1.9×1.3×0.7××0.83×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Mar 25Jun 26
3.2×2.5×1.9×1.3×0.7××0.83×Sep 21Dec 23Jun 26
P/E
19.9×
4th percentile of 4y
PEG
1.17
as reported

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +55.2% against a −53.4% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −1.1%/yr price move, ~+58.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−59.6 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Boston Scientific Corporation reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — the growth curves are steadily positive, but ROCE at 10.1% is below the 15% bar this page requires to call it Consistent. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +19.8% in FY25, profit +56.2% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
21%152%17%101%13%50%9.4%0.0%5.5%−52%%%19.8%56.2%FY21FY23FY25
21%152%17%101%13%50%9.4%0.0%5.5%−52%%%19.8%56.2%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
23%149%19%110%15%71%11%32%7.7%−7.4%%%17.5%76.7%74.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
23%149%19%110%15%71%11%32%7.7%−7.4%%%17.5%76.7%74.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
10%9.3%8.2%7.1%6.0%%10.1%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
10%9.3%8.2%7.1%6.0%%10.1%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Steady high
latest +17.5% · span +8.7% to +21.5%
Profit growth
Rising
latest +76.7% · span +3.4% to +127.1%
EPS growth
Rising
latest +74.5% · span +3.4% to +137.8%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 10.1% · span 6.3%–10.1%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+19.8%+16.5%
Profit+56.2%+60.4%
EPS+55.2%+62.8%
Stock price−53.4%−1.1%+1.9%+7.4%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+11.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
+100.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
14.0%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

52.1/100 — rank 10 of 30 in Medical Devices · 58% evidence confidence

Boston Scientific Corporation scores 52.1 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Medical Devices, ranking 10. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.2 + 17 + 11.2 + 1.7 = 52.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Boston Scientific Corporation reported $5.2 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.6% year on year. That is the 12th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 14.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $20.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to $20.6 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $20.1 B (+19.8% on the year), capping 4 years at 14.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $5.2 B, +11.6% year on year — the 12th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $20.1 B (+19.8% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
14.0% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
2221%1617%1113%5.49.4%0.05.5%$ B%$20B19.8%FY21FY23FY25
2221%1617%1113%5.49.4%0.05.5%$ B%$20B19.8%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $5.2 B (+11.6% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
12th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
5.724%4.320%2.917%1.414%0.010%$ B%$5B11.6%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
5.724%4.320%2.917%1.414%0.010%$ B%$5B11.6%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +17.7% growth against the decade's 14.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +17.5% over the last 4 quarters against +18.4%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +76.7% vs +42.0%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Boston Scientific Corporation's operating margin is 21.2% in the Mar 26 quarter, +1.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.1% to 18.0%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 21.2%, +1.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 10.1%–18.0%, and FY25's 18.0% is the top of that band — a record year.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.5 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

FY25: 18.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
the widest a 10.1–18.0% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
19%3.7%16%2.5%14%1.3%12%0.0%9.5%−1.2%%%18%2.5%FY21FY23FY25
19%3.7%16%2.5%14%1.3%12%0.0%9.5%−1.2%%%18%2.5%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: 21.2% operating margin (+1.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
22%8.9%19%5.9%17%2.9%14%0.0%12%−3.0%%%21.2%1.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
22%8.9%19%5.9%17%2.9%14%0.0%12%−3.0%%%21.2%1.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Boston Scientific Corporation earned $1.3 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year. It is the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.9 B. The 4-year compound rate is 29.1%. That is 25.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.7 B.

Mar 26 profit was $1.3 B, +100.0% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $2.9 B (+56.2%), and the 4-year compound rate is 29.1%.

FY25 profit $2.9 B (+56.2% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
29.1% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
3.1140%2.394%1.647%0.80.0%0.0−45%$ B%$3B56.2%FY21FY23FY25
3.1140%2.394%1.647%0.80.0%0.0−45%$ B%$3B56.2%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $1.3 B (+100.0% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
6th straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
1.4278%1.1201%0.7125%0.448%0.0−29%$ B%$1B100%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.4278%1.1201%0.7125%0.448%0.0−29%$ B%$1B100%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +11.6% and the margin +1.5 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +82.8% vs revenue +17.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 165% of Boston Scientific Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $4.5 B of operating cash against $2.9 B of profit. After $0.9 B of capital spending, $3.7 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $4.5 B against reported profit of $2.9 B, leaving free cash of $3.7 B after $0.9 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 165% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $4.5 B vs profit $2.9 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
165% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
4.93.72.41.20.0$ B$5B$3B$4BFY21FY23FY25
4.93.72.41.20.0$ B$5B$3B$4BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.3 B = 26% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
1.6280%1.2212%0.8144%0.475%0.07.2%$ B%$0B26%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.6280%1.2212%0.8144%0.475%0.07.2%$ B%$0B26%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Boston Scientific Corporation does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $2.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 3.3% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $2.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.9 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
1.00.70.50.20.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
1.00.70.50.20.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.2 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.41.30.30.90.20.60.10.20.0−0.1$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.41.30.30.90.20.60.10.20.0−0.1$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Boston Scientific Corporation earns a ROE of 12% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 4% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +4.6 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 14.4% net margin on 0.46× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 12%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 4% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 14.4% net margin × 0.46× asset turns × 1.78× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 11.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 11.2% − 6.6% = a +4.6 pp spread. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

FY25: ROE 12% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 6.6% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY22's 4%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
12%10%7.9%5.6%3.4%%11.8%9.3%FY21FY23FY25
12%10%7.9%5.6%3.4%%11.8%9.3%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC 10.5% (TTM) vs WACC 6.6% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
11%8.6%6.0%3.5%0.9%%10.5%8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
11%8.6%6.0%3.5%0.9%%10.5%8%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Boston Scientific Corporation pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Boston Scientific Corporation does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Boston Scientific Corporation carries total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $26.1 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.42. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.55 in FY21 to 0.47 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $26.1 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.42. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.55 (FY21) to 0.47 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $11.4 B at 0.47× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
120.56×9.30.53×6.20.51×3.10.49×0.00.46×$ B×$11B0.47×FY21FY23FY25
120.56×9.30.53×6.20.51×3.10.49×0.00.46×$ B×$11B0.47×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $11.0 B, debt-to-equity 0.42 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
130.54×9.40.51×6.30.47×3.10.44×0.00.41×$ B×$11B0.42×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
130.54×9.40.51×6.30.47×3.10.44×0.00.41×$ B×$11B0.42×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

1.9% of Boston Scientific Corporation's tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 1.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 1.4 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
1.9%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
1.4
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Boston Scientific Corporation: the Z-score reads 4.80. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 4.80 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 4.80.

15 · Related companies · Medical Devices
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1DexCom, Inc.DXCM 66.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.5 pp 45% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 21.4% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 12.9% · 1Y 10.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 16.8 + 9.9 + 16.5 = 66.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Globus Medical, Inc.GMED 60.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 25.6/35 Revenue 23.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 83% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 19.8% 76% evidence 15.2/20 P/E 20× · PEG 0.85 65% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y 39%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.6 + 14.8 + 15.2 + 4.7 = 60.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.1% and the one-year return is 39%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
3LivaNova PLCLIVN 57.8/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.7/35 Revenue 12.4% · PAT — · OPM change 109.8 pp 62% evidence 11.1/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 18.6% · 1Y 74.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.7 + 11.1 + 9.5 + 12.5 = 57.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4UFP Technologies, Inc.UFPT 56.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.7/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT 7.9% · OPM change -0.4 pp 83% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence 6.5/20 P/E 22× · PEG 2.9 65% evidence 18.9/20 RS sector 27.1% · RS bench 34.5% · 1Y 62.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.7 + 15.2 + 6.5 + 18.9 = 56.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 34.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
5STERIS plcSTE 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 22.3/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 27.4% · OPM change 5.3 pp 83% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence 12.8/20 P/E 27.9× · PEG 1 65% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -16.8% · RS bench -12% · 1Y -4.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 14.8 + 12.8 + 6.2 = 56.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Edwards Lifesciences CorporationEW 55.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.1 pp 45% evidence 17.9/25 ROCE 8.5% · OPM 29% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 52× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 14.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 17.9 + 9 + 6.6 = 55.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.ESTA 52.5/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence BREAKING OUT 25.0/35 Revenue 35.3% · PAT — · OPM change 30.1 pp 62% evidence 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -10.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 22.8% · RS bench 29.8% · 1Y 171.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25 + 3.6 + 10 + 13.9 = 52.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Butterfly Network, Inc.BFLY 52.5/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence LEADER 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 34.7 pp 45% evidence 3.1/25 ROCE -5.5% · OPM -52.3% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 88.6% · RS bench 99.8% · 1Y 562.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 3.1 + 10 + 20 = 52.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Stryker CorporationSYK 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 45% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 4.1% · OPM 15.5% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 32.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -14% · 1Y -11%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 15.6 + 9.4 + 7.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Boston Scientific Corporationthis pageBSX 52.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 45% evidence 17.0/25 ROCE 6.5% · OPM 21.2% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.7/20 RS sector -46.8% · RS bench -43.8% · 1Y -52.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 17 + 11.2 + 1.7 = 52.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Integer Holdings CorporationITGR 51.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 13.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.3 pp 45% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 7.2% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 21.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.7/20 RS sector 18.1% · RS bench 25.5% · 1Y 17.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.3 + 10.1 + 10.8 + 17.7 = 51.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.ZBH 48.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 16.9/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -16.9% · OPM change 2.6 pp 83% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 17.9% 76% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 23.5× · PEG 1.09 65% evidence 7.4/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -8% · 1Y -3.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 12.1 + 12.3 + 7.4 = 48.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
13Glaukos CorporationGKOS 48.6/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 6.2 pp 45% evidence 4.2/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -13.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 28% · RS bench 35.5% · 1Y 101.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 4.2 + 10 + 15.8 = 48.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Insulet CorporationPODD 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence TURNING 19.0/35 Revenue 31.9% · PAT -24.6% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 16% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 48.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -43.2% · RS bench -40% · 1Y -45.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 14.9 + 9.2 + 4.6 = 47.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Neogen CorporationNEOG 46.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4 pp 45% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM -1.6% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 1719× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 22.2% · RS bench 29.2% · 1Y 132.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 6.3 + 8.5 + 13.9 = 46.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.GEHC 45.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.2 pp 45% evidence 13.4/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 10% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 14.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y -2.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 13.4 + 11.4 + 5.3 = 45.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Haemonetics CorporationHAE 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 5.4/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT -41.3% · OPM change -28.2 pp 83% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -6.6% 76% evidence 15.1/20 P/E 26.4× · PEG 0.52 65% evidence 17.3/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 17% · 1Y 58.1%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 5.4 + 7 + 15.1 + 17.3 = 44.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 17%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
18Koninklijke Philips N.V.PHG 44.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 19.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 45% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 6.2% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y -1.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 10.9 + 11 + 3 = 44.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Medtronic plcMDT 43.1/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 18.1/35 Revenue 8.4% · PAT 3.1% · OPM change 3 pp 95% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 19.1% 76% evidence 5.6/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 3.08 65% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -19.6% · RS bench -15% · 1Y -7.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 14.3 + 5.6 + 5.1 = 43.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20TransMedics Group, Inc.TMDX 41.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence TURNING 16.7/35 Revenue 30.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change -11.5 pp 83% evidence 8.7/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 7.6% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 22.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -37.4% · RS bench -34.1% · 1Y -29.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.7 + 8.7 + 10.5 + 5.7 = 41.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21Axogen, Inc.AXGN 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence FADING 12.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence 5.6/25 ROCE -0.9% · OPM -4.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.0/20 RS sector 25.1% · RS bench 32.6% · 1Y 230.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 5.6 + 10 + 13 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22iRhythm Holdings, Inc.IRTC 40.3/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence TURNING 22.9/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT — · OPM change 12.4 pp 62% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE -1.9% · OPM -8.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 2.8/20 RS sector -26.9% · RS bench -22.6% · 1Y -19.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 4.6 + 10 + 2.8 = 40.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -26.9% and the one-year return is -19.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
23Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.INSP 40.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence TURNING 17.3/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 98.5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence 12.3/20 P/E 11.5× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -23.1% · RS bench -19.2% · 1Y -19%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 6.1 + 12.3 + 4.3 = 40 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24NovoCure LimitedNVCR 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence FADING 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -14.3 pp 45% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -38.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector 0.9% · RS bench 7.4% · 1Y 46.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16 + 3.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Penumbra, Inc.PEN 39.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 45% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 10.2% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 134.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -5.4% · 1Y 34.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 11.5 + 8.6 + 4.9 = 39 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Abbott LaboratoriesABT 35.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 7.9/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT -61.2% · OPM change -5 pp 95% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence 7.3/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG 2.31 65% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -21% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y -21.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.9 + 12.8 + 7.3 + 7.2 = 35.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Bruker CorporationBRKR 34.5/100Adverse evidence71% evidence LEADER 8.0/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -112.7% · OPM change -2.8 pp 83% evidence 9.2/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.2% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 79.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y 65.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8 + 9.2 + 8.8 + 8.5 = 34.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28Enovis CorporationENOV 46.0/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence TURNING 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.5 pp 39% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 58.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.0/20 RS sector -2% · RS bench 4% · 1Y 8.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 6.5 + 8.9 + 11 = 46 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Smith & Nephew plcSNN 42.9/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence BASING 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 22.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.7/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench -18.4% · 1Y -15.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.4 + 10.3 + 2.7 = 42.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.BIO-B 41.8/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence TURNING 14.8/35 Revenue 1.9% · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 45.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 4 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 7.7 + 9.3 + 10 = 41.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's stock price today?

Boston Scientific Corporation trades at $49.1, −53.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $71.0 B. The stock sits at 8% of its 52-week range of $44–$107, −32.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 22 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Boston Scientific Corporation's latest quarterly results?

Boston Scientific Corporation reported revenue of $5.2 B and net profit of $1.3 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 11.6% and profit rose 100.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.90. The operating margin was 21.2%, 1.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's revenue?

Boston Scientific Corporation reported revenue of $5.2 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.6% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $20.1 B (+19.8%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 14.0% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's profit?

Boston Scientific Corporation earned $1.3 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year — the 6th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.9 B. The operating margin ran 21.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's market cap?

Boston Scientific Corporation's market capitalisation is $71.0 B at a stock price of $49.1. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's P/E ratio?

Boston Scientific Corporation trades at a P/E of 19.9×, at the 4th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 68.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Boston Scientific Corporation pay a dividend?

No — Boston Scientific Corporation has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation overvalued?

On its own history, Boston Scientific Corporation looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 19.9× has been cheaper only 4% of the time in 4 years (long-run median 68.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation growing?

Yes — Boston Scientific Corporation is growing: latest-quarter revenue +11.6% year on year, profit +100.0%, and the margin +1.5 pp at 21.2%. The 4-year compound rates are 14.0% (revenue) and 29.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Boston Scientific Corporation performing?

Boston Scientific Corporation is in a downtrend, 22 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 11.6% and profit rose 100.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 62 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Boston Scientific Corporation in?

Mixed — the growth curves are steadily positive, but ROCE at 10.1% is below the 15% bar this page requires to call it Consistent. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +17.5% latest, profit growth +76.7% latest, eps growth +74.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation in an uptrend?

No — the price is in a downtrend (week 22 of stage 4), trading −32.5% versus its 200-day average and at 8% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Boston Scientific Corporation is currently behind the S&P 500 (62 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-05-30), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +105% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Boston Scientific Corporation's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Boston Scientific Corporation. What it measures instead: the stock price is $49.1, the price is in a downtrend 22 weeks in. Its P/E of 19.9× sits at the 4th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against Boston Scientific Corporation?

No — short interest is 1.9% of Boston Scientific Corporation's tradable float, about 1.4 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Boston Scientific Corporation have too much debt?

It is moderate — Boston Scientific Corporation's debt-to-equity is 0.50. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's capex?

Boston Scientific Corporation spent $2.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.9 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Boston Scientific Corporation's cash flow?

Boston Scientific Corporation generated $4.5 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $3.7 B of free cash flow after $0.9 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $2.9 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 165% of Boston Scientific Corporation's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $4.5 B against reported profit of $2.9 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Boston Scientific Corporation?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 4.80 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Boston Scientific Corporation in its business cycle?

Boston Scientific Corporation's FY25 operating margin was 18.0%, against a 5-year band of 10.1%–18.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 21.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Boston Scientific Corporation story?

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +55.2% against a −53.4% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Boston Scientific Corporation a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Boston Scientific Corporation's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +55.2% in a year against a −53.4% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI