Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc

JAZZ
Healthcare · Biotechnology

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +126.5% in a year while annual EPS moved −167.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (51 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 49th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 254% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.

Stage
Turning around
partial read
Price
$262
+126.5% 1Y
P/E
17.9×
49th pctile
of its own 2-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
$1.1 B
+18.9% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$0.3 B
Operating margin
31.8%
+38.5 pp YoY
ROE
22%
FY25
ROIC
17.2%
vs WACC 5.9% → +11.3 pp
Cash conversion
254%
of profit, last 2 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc trades at $262, in a confirmed uptrend and 51 weeks into that stage. That is +35.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of $118 to $262. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 24 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 51 of stage 2. At $262 it trades +35.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range ($118–$262).

Aug 26: $262 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+35.9% versus the 200-day line, week 51 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S4S3S1S2$275$227$180$132$84.7$$262$193Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S4S4S3S1S2$275$227$180$132$84.7$$262$193Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (527 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +87% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 24 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc trades at 17.9× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (49th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 18.1×, measured across 2.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 17.9× is mid-range by its own standards (49th percentile), against a long-run median of 18.1× measured over 2.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 17.9× vs a 18.1× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 2.1-year window; loss-period spikes above 54× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (49th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
57.7×$9.545.7×$7.133.7×$4.721.7×$2.49.7×$0.0×$18.35×$8Oct 23Apr 24Oct 24Apr 25Oct 25
57.7×$9.545.7×$7.133.7×$4.721.7×$2.49.7×$0.0×$18.35×$8Oct 23Oct 24Oct 25
PEG 0.15 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 19 quarters.
below 1.0, the growth looks cheap against the multiple
PEGPEG = 1.0
1.3×1.0×0.7×0.4×0.1××0.15×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
1.3×1.0×0.7×0.4×0.1××0.15×Sep 21Dec 23Mar 26
P/E
17.9×
49th percentile of 2y
PEG
0.19
as reported

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −167.5% against a +126.5% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Turning around

Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −43.2% at the trough to +5.3% off a 2-quarter-old trough (single-quarter readings), ROCE holding at 5.9%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +4.9% in FY25, profit −164.3% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
20%59%16%0.0%11%−63%7.5%−124%3.5%−184%%%4.9%−164.3%FY21FY23FY25
20%59%16%0.0%11%−63%7.5%−124%3.5%−184%%%4.9%−164.3%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
10%348%8.2%174%6.3%0.0%4.3%−174%2.4%−348%%%9.6%5.3%−100.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
10%348%8.2%174%6.3%0.0%4.3%−174%2.4%−348%%%9.6%5.3%−100.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
7.0%6.7%6.4%6.1%5.8%%5.9%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
7.0%6.7%6.4%6.1%5.8%%5.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Steady high
latest +9.6% · span +2.9% to +9.6%
Profit growth
Rolling over
latest +5.3% · span −100.0% to +100.0%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 5.9% · span 5.9%–6.9%

Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+4.9%+5.3%
Stock price+126.5%+26.2%+11.8%+5.7%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+18.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
8.4%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

63.0/100 — rank 2 of 30 in Biotechnology · 74% evidence confidence

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc scores 63.0 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Biotechnology, ranking 2. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.5 + 12.3 + 14.2 + 15 = 63. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc reported $1.1 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +18.9% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 8.4% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $4.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to $4.5 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $4.3 B (+4.9% on the year), capping 4 years at 8.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $1.1 B, +18.9% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $4.3 B (+4.9% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
8.4% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
4.620%3.516%2.311%1.27.5%0.03.5%$ B%$4B4.9%FY21FY23FY25
4.620%3.516%2.311%1.27.5%0.03.5%$ B%$4B4.9%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $1.1 B (+18.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
1.320%1.015%0.69.4%0.34.0%0.0−1.5%$ B%$1B18.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
1.320%1.015%0.69.4%0.34.0%0.0−1.5%$ B%$1B18.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +9.9% growth against the decade's 8.4% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +9.6% over the last 4 quarters against +7.7%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −95.9% vs −75.7%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's operating margin is 31.8% in the Mar 26 quarter, +38.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −10.1% to 17.7%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 31.8%, +38.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −10.1%–17.7%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +38.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −0.9 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY25: −10.1% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −10.1–17.7% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
20%21%12%7.6%3.8%−5.4%−4.3%−18%−12%−31%%%−10.1%−27.8%FY21FY23FY25
20%21%12%7.6%3.8%−5.4%−4.3%−18%−12%−31%%%−10.1%−27.8%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: 31.8% operating margin (+38.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
40%49%11%13%−17%−23%−45%−59%−74%−95%%%31.8%38.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
40%49%11%13%−17%−23%−45%−59%−74%−95%%%31.8%38.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc earned $0.3 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.4 B. That is 27.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.1 B. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $0.3 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.4 B (−164.3%).

FY25 profit $−0.4 B (−164.3% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.649%0.4−8.2%0.1−66%−0.2−123%−0.4−180%$ B%$−0B−164.3%FY21FY23FY25
0.649%0.4−8.2%0.1−66%−0.2−123%−0.4−180%$ B%$−0B−164.3%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.3 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.4231%0.128%−0.2−174%−0.5−377%−0.8−579%$ B%$0B5.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.4231%0.128%−0.2−174%−0.5−377%−0.8−579%$ B%$0B5.3%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −168.2% vs revenue +9.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 2 fiscal years 254% of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $1.4 B of operating cash against $−0.4 B of profit. After $0.1 B of capital spending, $1.3 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $1.4 B against reported profit of $−0.4 B, leaving free cash of $1.3 B after $0.1 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 254% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $1.4 B vs profit $−0.4 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
254% of 2-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
1.51.00.50.0−0.5$ B$1B$−0B$1BFY21FY23FY25
1.51.00.50.0−0.5$ B$1B$−0B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: operating cash $0.4 B = 141% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
0.5287%0.4237%0.3187%0.1136%0.086%$ B%$0B141%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.5287%0.4237%0.3187%0.1136%0.086%$ B%$0B141%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.1 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.060.050.030.020.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.060.050.030.020.00$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.0220.50.0160.40.0110.30.0050.20.0000.0$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.0220.50.0160.40.0110.30.0050.20.0000.0$ B$ B$0B$0BJun 23Sep 24Mar 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc earns a ROE of −8% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −8% in FY21. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +11.3 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is −8.4% net margin on 0.37× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −8%, recovered from a FY21 trough of −8% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −8.4% net margin × 0.37× asset turns × 2.70× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −8.4% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 17.2% − 5.9% = a +11.3 pp spread. The 5.9% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.

FY25: ROE −8% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 5.9% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY21's −8%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
15%9.1%2.7%−3.7%−10%%−8.3%−3.4%FY21FY23FY25
15%9.1%2.7%−3.7%−10%%−8.3%−3.4%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC 4.6% (TTM) vs WACC 5.9% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
24%15%5.3%−4.1%−14%%4.6%−1.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
24%15%5.3%−4.1%−14%%4.6%−1.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc carries total debt of $5.4 B against shareholder equity of $4.5 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 1.19. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.55 in FY21 to 1.25 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of $5.4 B against shareholder equity of $4.5 B — a debt-to-equity of 1.19. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.55 (FY21) to 1.25 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY25: debt $5.4 B at 1.25× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
6.61.9×5.01.7×3.31.6×1.71.4×0.01.2×$ B×$5B1.25×FY21FY23FY25
6.61.9×5.01.7×3.31.6×1.71.4×0.01.2×$ B×$5B1.25×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $5.4 B, debt-to-equity 1.19 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
6.71.7×5.01.6×3.31.4×1.71.3×0.01.2×$ B×$5B1.19×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
6.71.7×5.01.6×3.31.4×1.71.3×0.01.2×$ B×$5B1.19×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

6.3% of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 6.3% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 4.4 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
6.3%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
4.4
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc: the Z-score reads 2.08. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.08 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.08.

15 · Related companies · Biotechnology
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Exelixis, Inc.EXEL 64.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence LEADER 20.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.5 pp 39% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 10.8% · OPM 41.1% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.1/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 12.5% · 1Y 48.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 17.2 + 11.3 + 15.1 = 64.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Jazz Pharmaceuticals plcthis pageJAZZ 63.0/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence LEADER 21.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT -93.8% · OPM change 37.7 pp 62% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 31.5% 76% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG 0.33 65% evidence 15.0/20 RS sector 17.7% · RS bench 30.2% · 1Y 135.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 12.3 + 14.2 + 15 = 63 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Krystal Biotech, Inc.KRYS 60.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence FADING 22.9/35 Revenue 25.2% · PAT 80.7% · OPM change 5 pp 83% evidence 13.2/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 46.1% 76% evidence 12.5/20 P/E 34.5× · PEG 0.8 65% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector 4.9% · RS bench 15.6% · 1Y 134.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 13.2 + 12.5 + 12.1 = 60.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.HALO 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.9/35 Revenue 39.2% · PAT -28.3% · OPM change -4.4 pp 83% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 8.5% · OPM 49% 76% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 23.2× · PEG 0.27 65% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector -5.9% · RS bench 6.1% · 1Y 32.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 16.8 + 15 + 11.2 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Incyte CorporationINCY 58.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.2 pp 45% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 12.6% · OPM 23.7% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 14.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.6/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 9.5% · 1Y 53.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.4 + 17.7 + 11.2 + 12.6 = 58.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Roivant Sciences Ltd.ROIV 57.7/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence BREAKING OUT 20.2/35 Revenue -69% · PAT — · OPM change 20242.2 pp 62% evidence 12.2/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM — 61% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 2× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 16.6% · RS bench 28.1% · 1Y 201%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 12.2 + 11.5 + 13.8 = 57.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Corcept Therapeutics IncorporatedCORT 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -32.3 pp 45% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM -30.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 207× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.4/20 RS sector 33.3% · RS bench 50.7% · 1Y 51.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 12.7 + 8.5 + 19.4 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedVRTX 55.5/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.1/35 Revenue 10.1% · PAT — · OPM change 15.4 pp 62% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 38.1% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 26.5× · PEG 1.2 65% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -3.1% · 1Y 30.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 15.1 + 10.9 + 8.4 = 55.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Royalty Pharma plcRPRX 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence LEADER 12.1/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT -23.1% · OPM change -4.7 pp 83% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 89.3% 76% evidence 14.3/20 P/E 25.1× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence 15.5/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 53%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 13.5 + 14.3 + 15.5 = 55.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 15.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
10Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.REGN 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.7 pp 45% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 17.8% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.9/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -1.1% · 1Y 35.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 13.5 + 11 + 7.9 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Genmab A/SGMAB 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 14.9/35 Revenue 27.5% · PAT -19.9% · OPM change -6.2 pp 83% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 20.1% 76% evidence 15.7/20 P/E 20.4× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence 5.7/20 RS sector -19.9% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y 35.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 12.8 + 15.7 + 5.7 = 49.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
12argenx SEARGX 48.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.8 pp 45% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 30% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench -6.6% · 1Y 27.6%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 13.6 + 9.8 + 5.3 = 48.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13BeOne Medicines AGONC 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BASING 22.9/35 Revenue 37.4% · PAT — · OPM change 15.5 pp 62% evidence 11.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 16.5% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 69.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y 12.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 11.1 + 9 + 5.2 = 48.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.8% and the one-year return is 12.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
14Bio-Techne CorporationTECH 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.9/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -18.1% · OPM change 12 pp 83% evidence 12.9/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 24.2% 76% evidence 3.8/20 P/E 75.7× · PEG 7.7 65% evidence 12.8/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 9.4% · 1Y 43%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 12.9 + 3.8 + 12.8 = 47.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15Moderna, Inc.MRNA 46.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 615.4 pp 45% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE -8.6% · OPM -356.8% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 44.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 23.4% · 1Y 118.2%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 6.4 + 9.3 + 12.9 = 46.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.BBIO 44.5/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 35 pp 62% evidence 4.8/25 ROCE -16.5% · OPM -54.5% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 11.5/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 8.5% · 1Y 76.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 4.8 + 10 + 11.5 = 44.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ALNY 44.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 21.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 20 pp 45% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 23% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 56× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.7/20 RS sector -53% · RS bench -46.1% · 1Y -50.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 12.7 + 9.1 + 0.7 = 44.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Cytokinetics, IncorporatedCYTK 43.9/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence FADING 21.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 8907.6 pp 62% evidence 4.1/25 ROCE -16.9% · OPM -948.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector -1.3% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 130.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 4.1 + 10 + 8.6 = 43.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
19Insmed IncorporatedINSM 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BASING 24.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 217.2 pp 62% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -9.4% · OPM -50.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 2.2/20 RS sector -46.4% · RS bench -39.3% · 1Y -9.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 5.4 + 10 + 2.2 = 42.2 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -46.4% and the one-year return is -9.9%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
20Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.AXSM 40.0/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence FADING 16.4/35 Revenue 63.9% · PAT — · OPM change 13.8 pp 62% evidence 4.5/25 ROCE -20.2% · OPM -33.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 9.1/20 RS sector -0.4% · RS bench 10.2% · 1Y 102.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 4.5 + 10 + 9.1 = 40 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ARWR 40.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 10.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -261.8 pp 45% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE -8.5% · OPM -191.6% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 43.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 25.5% · RS bench 37.3% · 1Y 445.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.6 + 6.6 + 9.4 + 13.4 = 40 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22ABIVAX Société AnonymeABVX 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence ASLEEP 19.8/35 Revenue -66.7% · PAT — · OPM change 564.8 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -20.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -9.2% · RS bench 1% · 1Y 78.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 5.5 + 10 + 4.6 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Revolution Medicines, Inc.RVMD 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence LEADER 9.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -23854 pp 52% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -21.3% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 15.1/20 RS sector 56.1% · RS bench 69.1% · 1Y 452.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.1 + 5.2 + 10 + 15.1 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.MDGL 35.9/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 28 pp 45% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -6.7% · OPM -29.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 2.9/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y 46.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 6.8 + 10 + 2.9 = 35.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25BioNTech SEBNTX 35.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence BASING 13.9/35 Revenue 1% · PAT — · OPM change -237.7 pp 62% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE -3.5% · OPM -456.2% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 194.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -17.4% · 1Y -18.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 7.6 + 8.7 + 5.1 = 35.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.BMRN 32.5/100Adverse evidence81% evidence TURNING 8.7/35 Revenue 9.9% · PAT -48.7% · OPM change -13.1 pp 83% evidence 10.5/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 16.9% 76% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 41.2× · PEG 5.86 65% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector -14.4% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 5.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.7 + 10.5 + 5.2 + 8.1 = 32.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Ascendis Pharma A/SASND 55.4/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence ASLEEP 25.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 113.3 pp 62% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 10.1% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —2 of 3 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 25.2 + 10.1 + 10.1 + 10 = 55.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Apogee Therapeutics, Inc.APGE 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence LEADER 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 7.4/25 ROCE -8.5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 19.5/20 RS sector 46.5% · RS bench 59.8% · 1Y 279.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.4 + 7.4 + 10 + 19.5 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Nuvalent, Inc.NUVL 46.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.5/25 ROCE -10.5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 15.9% · 1Y 48.6%5 of 9 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 6.5 + 10 + 13.4 = 46.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Summit Therapeutics Inc.SMMT 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence BASING 12.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 48.3% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 1.9/20 RS sector -40% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y -52%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 17.2 + 10 + 1.9 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's stock price today?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc trades at $262, +126.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $17.0 B. The stock sits at 100% of its 52-week range of $118–$262, +35.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 51 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's latest quarterly results?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc reported revenue of $1.1 B and net profit of $0.3 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $4.43. The operating margin was 31.8%, 38.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's revenue?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc reported revenue of $1.1 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +18.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $4.3 B (+4.9%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 8.4% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's profit?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc earned $0.3 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.4 B. The operating margin ran 31.8% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's market cap?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's market capitalisation is $17.0 B at a stock price of $262. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's P/E ratio?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc trades at a P/E of 17.9×, at the 49th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 18.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc pay a dividend?

No — Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc overvalued?

On its own history, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 17.9× sits at the 49th percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 18.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc performing?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc is in a confirmed uptrend, 51 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 24 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc in?

Turning around — profit growth swung from −43.2% at the trough to +5.3% off a 2-quarter-old trough (single-quarter readings), ROCE holding at 5.9%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +9.6% latest, profit growth +5.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 51 of stage 2), trading +35.9% versus its 200-day average and at 100% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc beating the market?

On recent form, yes — Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 24 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +87% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $262, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 51 weeks in. Its P/E of 17.9× sits at the 49th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc?

Somewhat — short interest is 6.3% of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's tradable float, about 4.4 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc have too much debt?

It is moderate — Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's debt-to-equity is 0.92. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's capex?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.1 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's cash flow?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc generated $1.4 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $1.3 B of free cash flow after $0.1 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.4 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 2 fiscal years, 254% of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $1.4 B against reported profit of $−0.4 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.08 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc in its business cycle?

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's FY25 operating margin was −10.1%, against a 5-year band of −10.1%–17.7%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 31.8%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +126.5% in a year while annual EPS moved −167.5% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI