Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.'s earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew −2.6% in a year against a −12.7% price move.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is topping out (1 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 17th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +11.1% year on year, and 163% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. trades at $61.2, losing momentum at the top and 1 weeks into that stage. That is +0.6% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 46% of a 52-week range of $49 to $76. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week.
Today the stock is losing momentum at the top — week 1 of stage 3. At $61.2 it trades +0.6% versus its 200-day average and sits at 46% of its 52-week range ($49–$76).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +25% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 1 straight week — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. trades at 26.1× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 17% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 34.1×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 26.1× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 17% of the time, against a long-run median of 34.1× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −2.6% against a −12.7% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the −8.2%/yr price move, ~+4.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−12.2 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −3.8% latest against +35.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 9.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +6.3% | +2.6% | — | — |
| Profit | +0.0% | +13.0% | — | — |
| EPS | −2.6% | +13.1% | — | — |
| Stock price | −12.7% | −8.2% | −9.0% | +2.0% |
4-Factor Sector Score
47.3/100 — rank 16 of 30 in Specialty Business Services · 58% evidence confidence
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. scores 47.3 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Specialty Business Services, ranking 16. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.6 + 13.6 + 10.2 + 6.9 = 47.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.1% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 1.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.4 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.4 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.4 B (+6.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 1.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +8.1% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4.7% growth against the decade's 1.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +4.5% over the last 4 quarters against +4.2%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −3.8% vs +11.8%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s operating margin is 27.5% in the Mar 26 quarter, −2.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 16.8% to 26.6%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 27.5%, −2.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 16.8%–26.6%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −2.2 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.7 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.1% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is −5.1%. That is 25.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +11.1% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.3 B (+0.0%), and the 4-year compound rate is −5.1%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +8.1% and the margin −2.2 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −2.3% vs revenue +4.7%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 163% of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.5 B of operating cash against $0.3 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $0.4 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.3 B, leaving free cash of $0.4 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 163% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. earns a ROE of 10% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 8% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +2.0 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 19.3% net margin on 0.42× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 10%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 8% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 19.3% net margin × 0.42× asset turns × 1.23× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 10.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 10.6% − 8.6% = a +2.0 pp spread. The 8.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. paid $1.41 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 9.1% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.36 for Mar 26. Against the current price of $61.2 that is a trailing yield of 2.30%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. paid $1.41 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.36 for Mar 26. That is up 9.1% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $61.2 the trailing twelve months work out to 2.30% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. carries total debt of $0.1 B against shareholder equity of $2.6 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.02 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.03 in FY21 to 0.02 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Jun 26: total debt of $0.1 B against shareholder equity of $2.6 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.02. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.03 (FY21) to 0.02 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
11.5% of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 6.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 11.5% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 6.6 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.: the Z-score reads 8.86. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 8.86 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 8.86.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1First Advantage CorporationFA | 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 24.6/35 Revenue 53.4% · PAT — · OPM change 6.6 pp 62% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 294× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 19.9% · RS bench 26% · 1Y 24.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 9.5 + 8.5 + 19.2 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2ABM Industries IncorporatedABM | 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.3/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.1 pp 95% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 3.8% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 15.7× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector -4.5% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 11.4 + 15 + 11.7 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3AramarkARMK | 59.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 4.5% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.1/20 RS sector 11% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 41.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 12.4 + 9.7 + 17.1 = 59.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Cintas CorporationCTAS | 57.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.2 pp 45% evidence | 17.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 34.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.2/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y -10%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 17.1 + 9.6 + 10.2 = 57.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5AZZ Inc.AZZ | 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.6/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT -23.9% · OPM change 0.7 pp 95% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 17.2% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 20.7× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 9.9% · 1Y 38.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.8 + 10.7 + 12.1 = 55.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Quad/Graphics, Inc.QUAD | 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.1 pp 45% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 31.4% · RS bench 37.8% · 1Y 69.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 9.3 + 11.1 + 17 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7CBIZ, Inc.CBZ | 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench 14% · 1Y -12.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.3 + 10.7 + 10.9 + 17.7 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Maximus, Inc.MMS | 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 18.8/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT 23.9% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence | 16.4/20 P/E 9.6× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence | 2.7/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -25.6% · 1Y -22.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.8 + 14.3 + 16.4 + 2.7 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Cimpress plcCMPR | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.8/20 RS sector 14.3% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 85.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 11.2 + 9.9 + 13.8 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Global Payments Inc.GPN | 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 12.9/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT -55.2% · OPM change -20.9 pp 83% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence | 15.6/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG 0.34 65% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 3% · 1Y 9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 7.7 + 15.6 + 13.6 = 49.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 11RB Global, Inc.RBA | 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 21.1/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 7.3% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence | 4.3/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG 7.47 65% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y -2.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.1 + 15.7 + 4.3 + 7.8 = 48.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Cass Information Systems, Inc.CASS | 48.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.1 pp 45% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -37% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 18.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 8.5% · RS bench 14% · 1Y 38.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 4.4 + 10.7 + 16.6 = 48.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13UniFirst CorporationUNF | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 10.7/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -24.3% · OPM change -4.3 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 41.9× · PEG 1.23 65% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 18.6% · 1Y 68.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 15.4 = 47.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 18.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14UL Solutions Inc.ULS | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.7/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence | 16.2/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 18.2% 76% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 50.1× · PEG 4 65% evidence | 2.5/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y 17.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 16.2 + 4.9 + 2.5 = 47.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.4% and the one-year return is 17.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 15Thomson Reuters CorporationTRI | 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 18.9/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT -25.9% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 30.6% 76% evidence | 5.5/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG 4.61 65% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -22.7% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -40.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 16 + 5.5 + 6.9 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Dolby Laboratories, Inc.this pageDLB | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 28.5% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -13% · 1Y -15.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 13.6 + 10.2 + 6.9 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Eastman Kodak CompanyKODK | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.6/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT -317.5% · OPM change 4.9 pp 62% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -0.4% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -7.4% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 26.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 6.8 + 11.3 + 8.6 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Transcat, Inc.TRNS | 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 12.8/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT -61.5% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 125.1× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 11.4% · 1Y 16.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 10.1 + 9.7 + 14.4 = 47 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 11.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Copart, Inc.CPRT | 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BASING | 16.8/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT 5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 95% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 3.47 65% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -33.8% · RS bench -30.3% · 1Y -36.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 16.6 + 6.6 + 1.4 = 41.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 20Amentum Holdings, Inc.AMTM | 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 45% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 45.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -17.1% · 1Y -3.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 9.2 + 3.2 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Target Hospitality Corp.TH | 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 9.3/35 Revenue -7.4% · PAT -197.8% · OPM change -18.2 pp 62% evidence | 5.6/25 ROCE -2.9% · OPM -19.7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.0/20 RS sector 25.2% · RS bench 30.9% · 1Y 89.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.3 + 5.6 + 9 + 14 = 37.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 22LegalZoom.com, Inc.LZ | 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 10.3/35 Revenue 12.9% · PAT -60% · OPM change -3.6 pp 83% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 1.3% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 94.5× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -23.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 8.6 + 12 + 6.6 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23BrightView Holdings, Inc.BV | 35.3/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue 0% · PAT 2.2% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 103.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -14.2% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -13.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 7.5 + 8.7 + 6.2 = 35.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.RHLD | 33.7/100Adverse evidence62% evidence | TURNING | 10.5/35 Revenue 82.2% · PAT -83.2% · OPM change -26 pp 83% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -11.9% · 1Y 177.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.5 + 7.3 + 10 + 5.9 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25TIC Solutions, Inc.TIC | 31.2/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 39% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -27.4% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -11.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.7 + 10 + 1.6 = 31.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26BlackSky Technology Inc.BKSY | 29.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.0/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT — · OPM change -48.7 pp 62% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -89.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.9/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y 48.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9 + 3.8 + 10 + 6.9 = 29.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Spire Global, Inc.SPIR | 26.7/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.1/35 Revenue -36% · PAT — · OPM change -36.7 pp 62% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -30.4% · OPM -155.2% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 40.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.1 + 3.1 + 11.5 + 5 = 26.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28RELX PLCRELX | 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | TURNING | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y -23.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 16.1 + 10.5 + 6.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Public Policy Holding Company, Inc.PPHC | 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence | 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -11.5% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 7 + 10 + 10 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Rentokil Initial plcRTO | 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM — 61% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.7 + 9.8 + 1.5 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s stock price today?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. trades at $61.2, −12.7% over the past year. The company is valued at $6.0 B. The stock sits at 46% of its 52-week range of $49–$76, +0.6% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is topping out, 1 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported revenue of $0.4 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 8.1% and profit rose 11.1% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.99. The operating margin was 27.5%, 2.2 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported revenue of $0.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.4 B (+6.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 1.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s profit?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.1% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The operating margin ran 27.5% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s market cap?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $6.0 B at a stock price of $61.2. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s P/E ratio?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. trades at a P/E of 26.1×, at the 17th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 34.1×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Dolby Laboratories, Inc. pay a dividend?
Yes — Dolby Laboratories, Inc. declared $0.36 per share for Mar 26, and $1.41 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 9.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s dividend per share?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s most recently declared dividend is $0.36 per share for Mar 26, giving $1.41 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s dividend yield?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s trailing dividend yield is 2.30%: $1.41 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $61.2. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. overvalued?
On its own history, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 26.1× has been cheaper only 17% of the time in 4 years (long-run median 34.1×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. growing?
Yes — Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +8.1% year on year, profit +11.1%, and the margin −2.2 pp at 27.5%. The 4-year compound rates are 1.3% (revenue) and −5.1% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. performing?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is topping out, 1 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 8.1% and profit rose 11.1% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. in?
Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −3.8% latest against +35.0% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 9.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +4.5% latest, profit growth −3.8% latest, eps growth −4.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. in an uptrend?
It is stalling — the price is topping out (week 1 of stage 3), trading +0.6% versus its 200-day average and at 46% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Dolby Laboratories, Inc. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +25% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $61.2, the price is topping out 1 weeks in. Its P/E of 26.1× sits at the 17th percentile of its own 4-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Dolby Laboratories, Inc.?
Yes — short interest is 11.5% of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s tradable float, about 6.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Dolby Laboratories, Inc. have too much debt?
No — Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.02. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s capex?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s cash flow?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. generated $0.5 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.4 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.3 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 163% of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.5 B against reported profit of $0.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Dolby Laboratories, Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 8.86 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. in its business cycle?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 19.3%, against a 5-year band of 16.8%–26.6%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 27.5%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Dolby Laboratories, Inc. story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Dolby Laboratories, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew −2.6% in a year against a −12.7% price move. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.