Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Specialty Business Services Stocks

Specialty Business Services: ABM Industries Incorporated owns the largest revenue base; Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Specialty Business Services moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 1% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 2% on average over the last four reported quarters.

TURNING · ahead 3w~Moving with the index16 of 30 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months3 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more

RS ↑3w · 22/30 >200d (+6) · 16/30 lead (+7) · EPS 16/29↑

20030020262025202420232022 364348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100124Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 12 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 16.8% on a year ago · 20 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 94, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 21 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · down 7.3% on a year ago · 21 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 3.0% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 11.4% on a year ago · 21 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 96, against 100 at the start · up 11.9% on a year ago · 19 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 10.5% on a year ago · 21 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 18.3% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · up 16.8% on a year ago · 22 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · up 11.8% on a year ago · 19 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · up 15.3% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · down 5.3% on a year ago · 18 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 4.5% on a year ago · 19 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two119 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20030020262025202420232022 364348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100124Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 12 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · up 16.8% on a year ago · 20 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 94, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 21 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · down 7.3% on a year ago · 21 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 93, against 100 at the start · up 3.0% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 11.4% on a year ago · 21 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 96, against 100 at the start · up 11.9% on a year ago · 19 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · up 10.5% on a year ago · 21 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 18.3% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · up 16.8% on a year ago · 22 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 124, against 100 at the start · up 11.8% on a year ago · 19 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · up 15.3% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 19 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · down 5.3% on a year ago · 18 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 120, against 100 at the start · down 1.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · down 4.5% on a year ago · 19 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two119No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Specialty Business Services, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 30 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Specialty Business Services outperforming S&P 500?

Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 4.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 4.2%. 12 of 29 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Quad/Graphics, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +31.4%.

+4.2%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+4.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
12/29Stocks leading S&P 500
10/29Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 4.4% over 52 weeks and 4.2% over 13 weeks. 12 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 29 beat the sector itself. ABM Industries Incorporated leads with revenue of $9,053 million, based on 19 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$356.3B
Cintas Corporation
Revenue growing
13/18
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
12/29
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 30
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
First Advantage Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 63.6% evidence confidence.
Global Payments Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Quad/Graphics, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1First Advantage CorporationFA 61.8/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence LEADER 24.6/35 Revenue 53.4% · PAT — · OPM change 6.6 pp 62% evidence 9.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 294× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.2/20 RS sector 19.9% · RS bench 26% · 1Y 24.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 9.5 + 8.5 + 19.2 = 61.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2ABM Industries IncorporatedABM 60.4/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.3/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.1 pp 95% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 3.8% 76% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 15.7× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector -4.5% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 11.4 + 15 + 11.7 = 60.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3AramarkARMK 59.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 20.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 4.5% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.1/20 RS sector 11% · RS bench 16.6% · 1Y 41.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 12.4 + 9.7 + 17.1 = 59.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Cintas CorporationCTAS 57.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.2 pp 45% evidence 17.1/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 34.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.2/20 RS sector -8.3% · RS bench -3.5% · 1Y -10%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 17.1 + 9.6 + 10.2 = 57.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5AZZ Inc.AZZ 55.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT -23.9% · OPM change 0.7 pp 95% evidence 13.8/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 17.2% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 20.7× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence 12.1/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 9.9% · 1Y 38.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.8 + 10.7 + 12.1 = 55.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Quad/Graphics, Inc.QUAD 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.1 pp 45% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 31.4% · RS bench 37.8% · 1Y 69.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 9.3 + 11.1 + 17 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7CBIZ, Inc.CBZ 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 15× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.7/20 RS sector 8.2% · RS bench 14% · 1Y -12.8%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.3 + 10.7 + 10.9 + 17.7 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Maximus, Inc.MMS 52.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BASING 18.8/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT 23.9% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence 16.4/20 P/E 9.6× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence 2.7/20 RS sector -29.4% · RS bench -25.6% · 1Y -22.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 14.3 + 16.4 + 2.7 = 52.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Cimpress plcCMPR 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence LEADER 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.8/20 RS sector 14.3% · RS bench 20% · 1Y 85.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 11.2 + 9.9 + 13.8 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Global Payments Inc.GPN 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 12.9/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT -55.2% · OPM change -20.9 pp 83% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -0.5% 76% evidence 15.6/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG 0.34 65% evidence 13.6/20 RS sector -2.2% · RS bench 3% · 1Y 9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 7.7 + 15.6 + 13.6 = 49.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11RB Global, Inc.RBA 48.9/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 21.1/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 7.3% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence 4.3/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG 7.47 65% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y -2.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.1 + 15.7 + 4.3 + 7.8 = 48.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Cass Information Systems, Inc.CASS 48.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.1 pp 45% evidence 4.4/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -37% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 18.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.6/20 RS sector 8.5% · RS bench 14% · 1Y 38.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.2 + 4.4 + 10.7 + 16.6 = 48.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13UniFirst CorporationUNF 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence TURNING 10.7/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -24.3% · OPM change -4.3 pp 95% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 41.9× · PEG 1.23 65% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 13.1% · RS bench 18.6% · 1Y 68.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.7 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 15.4 = 47.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 18.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
14UL Solutions Inc.ULS 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 23.7/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence 16.2/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 18.2% 76% evidence 4.9/20 P/E 50.1× · PEG 4 65% evidence 2.5/20 RS sector -18.4% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y 17.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 16.2 + 4.9 + 2.5 = 47.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -18.4% and the one-year return is 17.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
15Thomson Reuters CorporationTRI 47.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence TURNING 18.9/35 Revenue 5.4% · PAT -25.9% · OPM change 1 pp 83% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 30.6% 76% evidence 5.5/20 P/E 26.6× · PEG 4.61 65% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -22.7% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y -40.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 16 + 5.5 + 6.9 = 47.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Dolby Laboratories, Inc.DLB 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 28.5% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -13% · 1Y -15.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 13.6 + 10.2 + 6.9 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Eastman Kodak CompanyKODK 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.6/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT -317.5% · OPM change 4.9 pp 62% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -0.4% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.6/20 RS sector -7.4% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 26.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 6.8 + 11.3 + 8.6 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Transcat, Inc.TRNS 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence TURNING 12.8/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT -61.5% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 125.1× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence 14.4/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 11.4% · 1Y 16.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.8 + 10.1 + 9.7 + 14.4 = 47 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 11.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
19Copart, Inc.CPRT 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence BASING 16.8/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT 5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 95% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence 6.6/20 P/E 20.6× · PEG 3.47 65% evidence 1.4/20 RS sector -33.8% · RS bench -30.3% · 1Y -36.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 16.6 + 6.6 + 1.4 = 41.4 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
20Amentum Holdings, Inc.AMTM 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 19.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 45% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 45.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.2/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -17.1% · 1Y -3.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 9 + 9.2 + 3.2 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21Target Hospitality Corp.TH 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence FADING 9.3/35 Revenue -7.4% · PAT -197.8% · OPM change -18.2 pp 62% evidence 5.6/25 ROCE -2.9% · OPM -19.7% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 25.2% · RS bench 30.9% · 1Y 89.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.3 + 5.6 + 9 + 14 = 37.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
22LegalZoom.com, Inc.LZ 37.5/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence BREAKING OUT 10.3/35 Revenue 12.9% · PAT -60% · OPM change -3.6 pp 83% evidence 8.6/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 1.3% 76% evidence 12.0/20 P/E 94.5× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -9% · 1Y -23.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.3 + 8.6 + 12 + 6.6 = 37.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23BrightView Holdings, Inc.BV 35.3/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue 0% · PAT 2.2% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence 7.5/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 103.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -14.2% · RS bench -9.8% · 1Y -13.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 7.5 + 8.7 + 6.2 = 35.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.RHLD 33.7/100Adverse evidence62% evidence TURNING 10.5/35 Revenue 82.2% · PAT -83.2% · OPM change -26 pp 83% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.4% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 5.9/20 RS sector -16.2% · RS bench -11.9% · 1Y 177.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 7.3 + 10 + 5.9 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25TIC Solutions, Inc.TIC 31.2/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 39% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 1.6/20 RS sector -27.4% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y -11.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.7 + 10 + 1.6 = 31.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26BlackSky Technology Inc.BKSY 29.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 9.0/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT — · OPM change -48.7 pp 62% evidence 3.8/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -89.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.9/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -8.3% · 1Y 48.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9 + 3.8 + 10 + 6.9 = 29.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Spire Global, Inc.SPIR 26.7/100Adverse evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 7.1/35 Revenue -36% · PAT — · OPM change -36.7 pp 62% evidence 3.1/25 ROCE -30.4% · OPM -155.2% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -3.6% · 1Y 40.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.1 + 3.1 + 11.5 + 5 = 26.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28RELX PLCRELX 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence TURNING 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence 16.1/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.8/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -14.2% · 1Y -23.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 16.1 + 10.5 + 6.8 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Public Policy Holding Company, Inc.PPHC 44.5/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -11.5% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 7 + 10 + 10 = 44.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Rentokil Initial plcRTO 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence ASLEEP 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM — 61% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.5/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.7 + 9.8 + 1.5 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 30 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Specialty Business Services at +177.9%. Quad/Graphics, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +37.8%. 12 of 29 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

ABM Industries Incorporated has the highest Revenue among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at $9,053 million. Global Payments Inc. is next at $8,868 million. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 82.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 19 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: ABM Industries Incorporated is the scale leader at $9,053 million, 2.1% ahead of Global Payments Inc.. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s growth is 82.2% from a $767 million base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderABM Industries Incorporated · $9,053 million
Gap2.1% versus #2 · Global Payments Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/30 companies · 503 observations

Investor read: ABM Industries Incorporated is the scale benchmark; Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: ABM Industries Incorporated's growth falls below Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
19/30 level · 18/30 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Aramark ARMK$4.9B6.1%Jun 2026
RELX PLC RELX$4.8B1.2%Jun 2026
Rentokil Initial plc RTO$3.5B5.8%Jun 2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM$3.5B-2.3%Jun 2026
Global Payments Inc. GPN$3.0B63%Mar 2026
Cintas Corporation CTAS$2.8B8.9%Jun 2026
ABM Industries Incorporated ABM$2.3B8.4%Jun 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI$2.1B9.8%Mar 2026
Maximus, Inc. MMS$1.3B-4.1%Mar 2026
Copart, Inc. CPRT$1.2B2.1%Jun 2026
RB Global, Inc. RBA$888M15%Mar 2026
Cimpress plc CMPR$886M12%Jun 2026
CBIZ, Inc. CBZ$849M1.3%Jun 2026
UL Solutions Inc. ULS$758M7.5%Mar 2026
BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV$703M6.0%Mar 2026
UniFirst Corporation UNF$634M3.8%Jun 2026
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD$581M-7.6%Jun 2026
TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC$488M109%Mar 2026
AZZ Inc. AZZ$449M6.4%Jun 2026
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD$408M292%Mar 2026
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB$396M7.0%Jun 2026
First Advantage Corporation FA$385M8.5%Mar 2026
Eastman Kodak Company KODK$265M7.3%Mar 2026
LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ$207M13%Mar 2026
Transcat, Inc. TRNS$89M16%Mar 2026
Target Hospitality Corp. TH$73M4.3%Mar 2026
Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS$28M0.0%Jun 2026
BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY$21M-30%Mar 2026
Spire Global, Inc. SPIR$16M-33%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.9B
$3.2B
$3.5B

Aramark · ARMK

$3.0B
$3.6B
$3.9B
$4.1B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$4.1B
$4.2B
$4.4B
$4.2B
$4.4B
$4.4B
$4.6B
$4.3B
$4.6B
$5.0B
$4.8B
$4.9B

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

$1.9B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.7B
$2.8B
$2.8B

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

$749M
$810M
$867M
$940M
$883M
$893M
$957M
$1.0B
$998M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

$285M
$352M
$334M
$290M
$335M
$376M
$298M
$291M
$316M
$365M
$289M
$305M
$357M
$370M
$316M
$307M
$347M
$396M

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$3.0B

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

$330M
$359M
$394M
$485M
$412M
$444M
$512M
$1.1B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$982M
$1.1B
$770M
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$888M

RELX PLC · RELX

$3.9B
$4.0B
$4.6B
$4.5B
$4.7B
$4.6B
$4.8B
$4.7B
$4.8B

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

$2.0B
$1.9B
$2.6B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.3B
$3.4B
$3.4B
$3.5B

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.1B

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

$649M
$623M
$645M
$623M
$629M
$629M
$689M
$676M
$684M
$670M
$730M
$731M
$739M
$705M
$776M
$783M
$789M
$758M

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

$465M
$486M
$487M
$512M
$516M
$542M
$543M
$577M
$572M
$594M
$591M
$603M
$640M
$605M
$602M
$611M
$614M
$621M
$623M
$634M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

7.6%
72%
70%
66%
15%
-7.3%
-2.3%

Aramark · ARMK

38%
10%
5.0%
1.8%
13%
7.3%
8.0%
5.2%
3.3%
1.9%
5.7%
11%
13%
6.1%

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

13%
14%
13%
12%
10%
8.1%
9.3%
9.9%
8.2%
6.8%
7.8%
8.4%
8.0%
8.6%
9.3%
8.9%

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

18%
10%
10%
8.7%
13%
14%
6.6%
10%
7.1%
12%
14%
7.5%
5.2%
0.7%
-3.5%
2.1%

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

16%
1.8%
-4.8%
-11%
0.3%
-5.7%
-2.9%
-3.0%
4.8%
13%
1.4%
9.3%
0.7%
-2.8%
7.0%

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

6.7%
3.8%
2.7%
6.3%
7.5%
8.4%
8.0%
5.6%
-20%
-19%
-21%
-25%
-0.7%
0.5%
0.0%
63%

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

22%
25%
24%
30%
128%
148%
134%
108%
-1.0%
-3.7%
9.7%
-28%
8.2%
11%
5.3%
15%

RELX PLC · RELX

6.7%
17%
19%
13%
1.7%
3.2%
2.8%
2.2%
1.2%

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

-11%
-5.0%
30%
77%
34%
-3.6%
-3.0%
3.0%
5.8%

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

5.4%
3.2%
3.2%
3.8%
2.0%
1.3%
2.8%
8.5%
5.7%
8.2%
5.2%
0.8%
2.6%
3.4%
5.2%
9.8%

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

8.2%
-3.1%
1.0%
6.8%
8.5%
8.7%
6.5%
6.0%
8.1%
8.0%
5.2%
6.3%
7.1%
6.8%
7.5%

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

11%
12%
12%
13%
11%
9.6%
8.8%
4.5%
12%
1.9%
1.9%
1.3%
-4.1%
2.6%
3.5%
3.8%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Copart, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 37.5%. Thomson Reuters Corporation is next at 30.6%. First Advantage Corporation has the highest Margin change at +6.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Copart, Inc. leads opm at 37.5%; First Advantage Corporation leads margin change at +6.6 percentage points.

LeaderCopart, Inc. · 37.5%
Gap22.5% versus #2 · Thomson Reuters Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/30 companies · 485 observations

Investor read: Copart, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
3UL Solutions Inc. ULS+2.7 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
27/30 level · 27/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Copart, Inc. CPRT38%+0.2 ppJun 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI31%+1.0 ppMar 2026
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB29%−0.7 ppJun 2026
Cintas Corporation CTAS23%−0.2 ppJun 2026
CBIZ, Inc. CBZ23%−0.7 ppJun 2026
UL Solutions Inc. ULS18%+2.7 ppMar 2026
RB Global, Inc. RBA18%+0.5 ppMar 2026
AZZ Inc. AZZ17%+0.7 ppJun 2026
Maximus, Inc. MMS11%+0.2 ppMar 2026
First Advantage Corporation FA8.7%+6.6 ppMar 2026
Cimpress plc CMPR5.5%+0.4 ppJun 2026
Transcat, Inc. TRNS4.8%−4.2 ppMar 2026
Aramark ARMK4.5%+0.6 ppJun 2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM4.3%+1.4 ppJun 2026
ABM Industries Incorporated ABM3.8%−0.1 ppJun 2026
UniFirst Corporation UNF3.6%−4.3 ppJun 2026
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD3.0%−0.1 ppJun 2026
BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV2.3%−1.1 ppMar 2026
LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ1.3%−3.6 ppMar 2026
Eastman Kodak Company KODK-0.4%+4.9 ppMar 2026
Global Payments Inc. GPN-0.5%−20.9 ppMar 2026
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD-1.4%−26.0 ppMar 2026
TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC-6.0%−2.0 ppMar 2026
Target Hospitality Corp. TH-20%−18.2 ppMar 2026
Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS-37%−7.1 ppJun 2026
BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY-89%−48.7 ppMar 2026
Spire Global, Inc. SPIR-155%−36.7 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

-7.1%
4.3%
4.3%
4.2%
1.2%
3.9%
3.2%
2.9%
3.4%
4.3%
4.3%

Aramark · ARMK

2.5%
3.7%
3.7%
3.6%
3.9%
3.2%
3.3%
5.1%
3.8%
3.8%
3.7%
5.0%
4.8%
4.1%
3.9%
4.3%
4.5%
4.5%

AZZ Inc. · AZZ

15%
16%
13%
14%
16%
12%
11%
17%
15%
14%
12%
17%
17%
15%
12%
17%
16%
16%
15%
17%

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

21%
20%
21%
20%
20%
21%
20%
21%
21%
21%
22%
22%
22%
23%
23%
22%
23%
23%
23%

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

40%
41%
40%
40%
37%
35%
38%
41%
39%
39%
37%
39%
34%
35%
37%
37%
37%
37%
35%
38%

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

14%
26%
13%
16%
28%
29%
5.3%
-1.2%
21%
30%
13%
15%
22%
29%
15%
9.7%
18%
29%

First Advantage Corporation · FA

13%
12%
9.0%
11%
13%
14%
6.4%
9.5%
12%
15%
-0.4%
5.4%
4.6%
-26%
2.1%
9.7%
10%
11%
8.7%

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

18%
15%
17%
-23%
17%
18%
2.5%
25%
23%
21%
19%
24%
22%
36%
20%
22%
39%
8.8%
-0.5%

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

16%
15%
59%
19%
15%
15%
-4.9%
16%
14%
16%
19%
18%
16%
18%
17%
16%
15%
15%
18%

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

19%
15%
25%
24%
25%
36%
29%
50%
28%
31%
30%
24%
24%
38%
30%
24%
33%
27%
31%

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

13%
17%
16%
19%
15%
12%
17%
13%
13%
14%
17%
18%
16%
16%
18%
20%
15%
18%

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

9.7%
9.2%
4.6%
6.6%
6.4%
8.0%
3.8%
5.8%
6.3%
9.0%
4.7%
8.0%
8.4%
9.2%
5.2%
7.9%
8.1%
7.3%
4.2%
3.6%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

+11.4 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.4 pp

Aramark · ARMK

+1.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp

AZZ Inc. · AZZ

+0.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.9 pp
+3.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.7 pp
0.0 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+3.3 pp
+0.7 pp

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

+0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

−3.5 pp
−5.8 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.4 pp
+3.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.2 pp
−5.6 pp
−3.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.2 pp

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

−6.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.3 pp
−7.7 pp
−16.9 pp
−7.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+7.4 pp
+16.4 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.4 pp
−5.5 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.7 pp

First Advantage Corporation · FA

+1.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.6 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−6.8 pp
−4.1 pp
−7.0 pp
−40.8 pp
+2.5 pp
+4.3 pp
+5.7 pp
+37.0 pp
+6.6 pp

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

−40.2 pp
−1.3 pp
+3.5 pp
−14.9 pp
+47.8 pp
+5.6 pp
+2.4 pp
+16.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
+15.5 pp
+1.7 pp
−2.3 pp
+16.6 pp
−27.2 pp
−20.9 pp

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

−3.7 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp
−64.0 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+23.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.7 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.4 pp
+0.5 pp

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

+3.6 pp
+6.8 pp
+20.8 pp
+4.5 pp
+25.9 pp
+2.4 pp
−5.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−26.2 pp
−3.6 pp
+7.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+9.2 pp
−10.9 pp
+1.0 pp

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

+4.3 pp
+1.7 pp
−4.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.6 pp
+2.7 pp

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

−3.3 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.0 pp
−4.3 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Thomson Reuters Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at $1,564 million. Copart, Inc. is next at $1,548 million. ABM Industries Incorporated has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Thomson Reuters Corporation leads with $1,564 million of TTM profit, 1% above Copart, Inc.. ABM Industries Incorporated shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (101.3% uncapped) growth from a $159 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderThomson Reuters Corporation · $1,564 million
Gap1% versus #2 · Copart, Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/30 companies · 504 observations

Investor read: Thomson Reuters Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
2Copart, Inc. CPRT$1.5B
4RB Global, Inc. RBA$412M
5Maximus, Inc. MMS$373M
Profit growthfastest growers
4Copart, Inc. CPRT5.0%
Net profit · company comparison
19/30 level · 13/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
RELX PLC RELX$1.1B15%Jun 2026
Cintas Corporation CTAS$502M8.4%Jun 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI$484M12%Mar 2026
Copart, Inc. CPRT$401M-1.0%Jun 2026
CBIZ, Inc. CBZ$162M32%Jun 2026
Rentokil Initial plc RTO$126M7.7%Jun 2026
Aramark ARMK$102M42%Jun 2026
RB Global, Inc. RBA$98M24%Mar 2026
Maximus, Inc. MMS$98M1.0%Mar 2026
UL Solutions Inc. ULS$97M37%Mar 2026
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB$95M3.3%Jun 2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM$54M2,100%Jun 2026
AZZ Inc. AZZ$52M-70%Jun 2026
ABM Industries Incorporated ABM$43M2.4%Jun 2026
UniFirst Corporation UNF$20M-50%Jun 2026
Cimpress plc CMPR$15M-21%Jun 2026
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD$6M0.0%Jun 2026
First Advantage Corporation FA$2M-100%Mar 2026
BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV$2M-67%Mar 2026
Transcat, Inc. TRNS$2M-50%Mar 2026
LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ$1M-80%Mar 2026
Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS$0M-100%Jun 2026
Target Hospitality Corp. TH$-13M-215%Mar 2026
Eastman Kodak Company KODK$-16M-515%Mar 2026
Spire Global, Inc. SPIR$-26M-129%Mar 2026
BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY$-30M-1,400%Mar 2026
TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC$-42MMar 2026
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD$-93M-504%Mar 2026
Global Payments Inc. GPN$-213M-198%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

$-212M
$-39M
$-42M
$-24M
$22M
$21M
$2M
$-1M
$37M
$44M
$54M

Aramark · ARMK

$33M
$34M
$36M
$40M
$38M
$14M
$287M
$108M
$29M
$53M
$58M
$134M
$106M
$62M
$72M
$128M
$97M
$102M

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

$331M
$295M
$315M
$294M
$352M
$324M
$326M
$346M
$385M
$375M
$398M
$414M
$452M
$448M
$463M
$448M
$491M
$495M
$502M

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

$256M
$260M
$287M
$279M
$264M
$246M
$294M
$350M
$348M
$333M
$326M
$382M
$322M
$361M
$387M
$405M
$395M
$402M
$350M
$401M

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

$44M
$80M
$37M
$40M
$79M
$96M
$16M
$10M
$68M
$98M
$40M
$59M
$68M
$92M
$47M
$50M
$54M
$95M

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

$274M
$199M
$232M
$-679M
$257M
$247M
$-24M
$267M
$359M
$371M
$307M
$297M
$288M
$470M
$218M
$192M
$456M
$135M
$-213M

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

$32M
$31M
$178M
$53M
$43M
$45M
$-28M
$87M
$63M
$84M
$107M
$111M
$76M
$118M
$79M
$110M
$95M
$109M
$98M

RELX PLC · RELX

$810M
$760M
$872M
$873M
$915M
$986M
$958M
$979M
$1.1B

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

$191M
$151M
$130M
$235M
$250M
$229M
$117M
$164M
$126M

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

$431M
$300M
$220M
$754M
$790M
$59M
$167M
$470M
$544M
$390M
$472M
$783M
$285M
$612M
$431M
$301M
$441M
$338M
$484M

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

$72M
$89M
$65M
$73M
$82M
$58M
$99M
$57M
$62M
$60M
$106M
$94M
$85M
$71M
$97M
$106M
$71M
$97M

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

$35M
$34M
$18M
$25M
$26M
$34M
$18M
$24M
$28M
$42M
$20M
$38M
$45M
$43M
$24M
$40M
$41M
$34M
$20M
$20M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

76%
2,100%

Aramark · ARMK

21%
12%
697%
170%
-24%
279%
-80%
24%
266%
17%
24%
21%
56%
42%

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

9.7%
6.3%
9.8%
3.5%
18%
9.4%
16%
22%
20%
17%
19%
16%
8.2%
8.6%
10%
8.4%

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

3.1%
-5.4%
2.4%
25%
32%
35%
11%
9.1%
-7.5%
8.4%
19%
6.0%
23%
11%
-9.6%
-1.0%

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

-33%
-9.1%
-1.3%
-57%
-75%
-14%
2.1%
150%
490%
0.0%
-6.1%
18%
-15%
-21%
3.3%

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

-399%
-6.2%
24%
-110%
40%
50%
11%
-20%
27%
-29%
-35%
58%
-71%
-198%

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

-13%
34%
45%
-116%
64%
47%
87%
28%
21%
40%
-26%
-0.9%
25%
-7.6%
24%

RELX PLC · RELX

22%
15%
7.7%
15%
4.9%
13%
4.7%
-0.7%
15%

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

-2.6%
-8.5%
-32%
56%
92%
-2.6%
-53%
-28%
7.7%

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

83%
-80%
-24%
-38%
-31%
561%
183%
67%
-48%
57%
-8.7%
-62%
55%
-45%
12%

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

98%
14%
-35%
52%
-22%
-24%
3.5%
7.1%
65%
37%
18%
-8.5%
13%
-16%
37%

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

-26%
0.0%
0.0%
-4.0%
7.7%
24%
11%
58%
61%
2.4%
20%
5.3%
-8.9%
-21%
-17%
-50%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

RELX PLC has the highest ROCE among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 9.3%. Cintas Corporation is next at 8.4%. Cass Information Systems, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +1.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: RELX PLC leads ROCE at 9.3%, 0.9 percentage points above Cintas Corporation. Cass Information Systems, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +1.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderRELX PLC · 9.3%
Gap10.7% versus #2 · Cintas Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 531 observations

Investor read: RELX PLC sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1RELX PLC RELX9.3%
5Copart, Inc. CPRT5.2%
ROCE changefastest improvers
2UL Solutions Inc. ULS+1.3 pp
3RELX PLC RELX+0.9 pp
4Cintas Corporation CTAS+0.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
RELX PLC RELX9.3%+0.9 ppJun 2026
Cintas Corporation CTAS8.4%+0.7 ppJun 2026
RB Global, Inc. RBA7.5%+0.2 ppMar 2026
UL Solutions Inc. ULS6.7%+1.3 ppMar 2026
Copart, Inc. CPRT5.2%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Cimpress plc CMPR4.9%−0.5 ppJun 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI4.3%+0.6 ppMar 2026
Maximus, Inc. MMS4.2%−0.3 ppMar 2026
AZZ Inc. AZZ3.9%+0.3 ppJun 2026
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD2.2%+0.3 ppJun 2026
Aramark ARMK2.1%+0.2 ppJun 2026
ABM Industries Incorporated ABM2.1%0.0 ppJun 2026
Rentokil Initial plc RTO1.8%+0.2 ppJun 2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM1.6%+0.5 ppJun 2026
LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ1.5%−3.1 ppMar 2026
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB1.2%−0.6 ppJun 2026
Transcat, Inc. TRNS1.1%−1.2 ppMar 2026
UniFirst Corporation UNF0.9%−1.1 ppJun 2026
First Advantage Corporation FA0.9%+0.6 ppMar 2026
CBIZ, Inc. CBZ0.8%−1.3 ppJun 2026
BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV0.6%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Global Payments Inc. GPN0.0%−0.9 ppMar 2026
Eastman Kodak Company KODK-0.1%+0.6 ppMar 2026
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD-0.2%−15.7 ppMar 2026
TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC-1.0%−0.1 ppMar 2026
Target Hospitality Corp. TH-2.9%−2.7 ppMar 2026
Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS-3.2%+1.6 ppJun 2026
BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY-6.5%−1.1 ppMar 2026
Spire Global, Inc. SPIR-30%−8.5 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
1.2%
0.4%
1.8%
2.2%
1.1%
1.4%
1.3%
1.6%

Aramark · ARMK

1.1%
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
1.0%
1.1%
1.8%
1.5%
1.4%
1.5%
2.2%
2.3%
1.7%
1.9%
2.4%
2.2%
2.1%

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

6.3%
6.0%
6.5%
6.2%
7.2%
7.0%
7.1%
6.7%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.5%
7.7%
8.0%
7.9%
7.7%
8.0%
8.5%
8.2%
8.4%

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

8.5%
8.4%
8.4%
7.2%
6.5%
7.2%
7.7%
7.0%
6.7%
6.1%
6.6%
5.1%
5.5%
5.5%
5.5%
4.8%
4.8%
4.2%
5.2%

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

1.5%
3.2%
1.6%
1.7%
3.6%
4.1%
0.6%
-0.1%
2.6%
4.3%
1.4%
1.8%
3.0%
4.0%
1.8%
1.1%
2.3%
4.1%
1.2%

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

1.0%
0.8%
0.9%
-1.3%
1.0%
1.0%
0.1%
1.5%
1.4%
1.2%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.7%
0.9%
1.0%
1.9%
0.4%
0.0%

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

15%
9.0%
9.8%
14%
14%
16%
3.3%
4.5%
5.5%
6.4%
7.5%
7.3%
7.3%
7.5%
7.3%
7.2%
7.2%
7.2%
7.5%

RELX PLC · RELX

5.2%
5.2%
5.3%
5.3%
6.0%
6.0%
6.5%
6.5%
6.8%
6.8%
7.7%
7.7%
7.6%
7.6%
8.4%
8.4%
8.5%
8.5%
9.3%
9.3%

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

3.1%
3.1%
2.1%
2.1%
1.4%
1.4%
2.4%
2.4%
2.0%
2.0%
1.9%
1.9%
1.5%
1.5%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.5%
1.8%
1.8%

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

1.6%
1.5%
2.0%
1.9%
2.1%
3.5%
2.7%
4.7%
2.7%
3.5%
3.4%
2.7%
2.7%
4.7%
3.7%
2.9%
4.1%
3.7%
4.3%

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

0.0%
2.9%
10%
4.8%
3.8%
3.7%
11%
4.4%
4.2%
4.5%
6.1%
6.1%
5.6%
5.4%
6.7%
7.3%
5.6%
6.7%

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

2.1%
1.1%
1.6%
1.5%
2.0%
0.9%
1.5%
1.6%
2.3%
1.2%
2.1%
2.3%
2.3%
1.3%
2.0%
2.0%
1.8%
1.0%
0.9%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.5 pp

Aramark · ARMK

+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

+0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.7 pp

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

−2.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.3 pp

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.6 pp

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.9 pp

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

−0.5 pp
+6.5 pp
−6.5 pp
−9.6 pp
−8.9 pp
−9.1 pp
+4.2 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.2 pp

RELX PLC · RELX

+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

−1.7 pp
−1.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

+0.5 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.6 pp
0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.6 pp

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

+4.8 pp
+0.9 pp
−6.6 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
−5.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
0.0 pp
+1.3 pp

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.1 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Maximus, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 0.29×. Global Payments Inc. is next at 0.34×. Spire Global, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 8.33×, so level and change sit with different companies. 11 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Maximus, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29×, 14.7% below Global Payments Inc.. Only 11 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderMaximus, Inc. · 0.29×
Gap14.7% versus #2 · Global Payments Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/30 companies · 78 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
11/30 level · 26/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
RB Global, Inc. RBA7.544.1Mar 2026
CBIZ, Inc. CBZ5.715.0Jun 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI4.626.6Mar 2026
Cintas Corporation CTAS4.434.9Jun 2026
UL Solutions Inc. ULS4.050.1Mar 2026
Copart, Inc. CPRT3.520.6Jun 2026
AZZ Inc. AZZ1.420.7Jun 2026
Transcat, Inc. TRNS1.4125.1Mar 2026
UniFirst Corporation UNF1.241.9Jun 2026
Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS1.118.5Jun 2026
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB1.122.8Jun 2026
LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ0.994.5Mar 2026
Aramark ARMK0.732.0Jun 2026
Target Hospitality Corp. TH0.471.2Mar 2026
ABM Industries Incorporated ABM0.415.7Jun 2026
Global Payments Inc. GPN0.313.4Mar 2026
Maximus, Inc. MMS0.39.6Mar 2026
Eastman Kodak Company KODK0.212.9Mar 2026
RELX PLC RELX19.2Jun 2026
Rentokil Initial plc RTO30.3Jun 2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM45.1Jun 2026
First Advantage Corporation FA294.0Mar 2026
Cimpress plc CMPR26.8Jun 2026
BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV103.1Mar 2026
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD13.4Jun 2026
Spire Global, Inc. SPIR8.3Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 18 companies with a series here. The remaining 6 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Aramark · ARMK

0.7

AZZ Inc. · AZZ

1.4

CBIZ, Inc. · CBZ

0.4
1.3
1.2
5.7

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

3.4
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.5
3.2
3.4
3.5
4.4

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

2.8
1.4
1.4
1.9
4.0
5.4
5.7
1.9
1.7
3.4
3.5

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

0.9
0.7
0.9
1.1

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

0.3
0.7
0.3

Maximus, Inc. · MMS

0.6
0.3
0.4
0.9
1.5
0.3
0.3

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

2.2
3.9
3.8
7.5

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

1.8
4.6

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

3.8
1.3
1.2
2.2
4.0

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

3.4
2.4
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.2

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 26 companies with a series here. The remaining 14 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM

301.2
60.1
96.1
76.2
45.1

Aramark · ARMK

190.0
47.0
36.6
34.3
27.5
15.0
9.8
13.9
16.2
36.2
38.8
29.5
26.3
31.2
32.0
31.0
32.0

Cintas Corporation · CTAS

37.4
39.4
33.2
34.2
34.1
37.6
35.2
36.3
37.9
40.1
43.4
44.7
50.8
54.4
48.0
51.5
46.6
40.2
42.4
34.9

Copart, Inc. · CPRT

37.5
28.5
25.3
28.4
25.9
30.0
33.5
34.5
32.0
34.6
38.3
37.4
36.3
38.9
40.2
28.5
26.2
25.4
20.6

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB

31.1
39.0
38.2
36.5
38.1
34.6
37.2
38.7
44.7
42.7
36.2
28.1
28.9
30.2
27.1
27.6
26.5
22.9
22.8

Global Payments Inc. · GPN

49.7
41.1
39.2
614.7
491.1
248.3
32.8
34.6
33.7
26.5
17.7
19.3
18.2
15.8
14.0
11.7
13.4

RB Global, Inc. · RBA

40.0
44.6
21.6
24.5
22.7
20.1
83.1
79.5
70.2
45.6
42.5
43.6
44.6
49.1
52.1
51.4
50.0
44.1

RELX PLC · RELX

29.6
31.8
30.2
27.4
26.4
27.0
29.9
28.9
29.9
33.3
35.4
36.2
34.9
35.1
37.8
38.3
33.0
26.8
21.1
19.2

Rentokil Initial plc · RTO

42.2
44.0
50.0
51.3
43.7
30.5
32.3
32.0
29.3
32.7
31.2
34.6
31.2
31.8
33.7
30.3

Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI

8.6
10.4
32.4
106.5
53.4
43.0
59.5
30.6
25.8
25.2
29.7
32.4
33.6
32.8
36.2
55.8
40.1
39.6
26.6

UL Solutions Inc. · ULS

31.5
32.7
30.8
33.8
45.0
42.4
49.3
50.1

UniFirst Corporation · UNF

25.6
26.7
28.0
33.5
34.9
35.9
31.4
31.5
28.7
27.3
23.7
24.4
25.7
26.7
23.2
22.3
22.8
31.8
41.9
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Specialty Business Services comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 30 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Specialty Business Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Specialty Business Services company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Specialty Business Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Specialty Business Services sector outperforming S&P 500?

Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 4.4% over 52 weeks and 4.2% over 13 weeks. 12 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 29 beat the sector itself.

Which Specialty Business Services company is largest by revenue?

ABM Industries Incorporated leads with revenue of $9,053 million, based on 19 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Specialty Business Services company is growing fastest?

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 82.2%, across 18 of 30 comparable companies.

Which Specialty Business Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

First Advantage Corporation ranks first at 61.8/100 with 63.6% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Specialty Business Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Maximus, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29, among 11 of 30 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Specialty Business Services comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Specialty Business Services company is the biggest?

ABM Industries Incorporated is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $9,053 million, ahead of Global Payments Inc. at $8,868 million. That covers 19 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Specialty Business Services company has the best profit margins?

Copart, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 37.5%, from 27 of 30 comparable companies. First Advantage Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Specialty Business Services company makes the most profit?

Thomson Reuters Corporation earns the most, at $1,564 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 19 of 30 comparable companies. ABM Industries Incorporated has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Specialty Business Services company earns the highest return on capital?

RELX PLC leads on return on capital employed at 9.3%, across 30 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Specialty Business Services stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Maximus, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.29×. Only 11 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Specialty Business Services sector beating the market?

Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 4.4% over the last 52 weeks and 4.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 12 of 29 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Specialty Business Services stock has the strongest price momentum?

Quad/Graphics, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Specialty Business Services company scores highest for research priority?

First Advantage Corporation scores 61.8 out of 100 with 63.6% evidence confidence, from 24.6 points on growth and earnings, 9.5 on capital efficiency, 8.5 on valuation and 19.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Specialty Business Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Specialty Business Services sector?

The 30 Specialty Business Services companies on this page carry $356,349 million of combined market value. Cintas Corporation is the largest at $81,495 million, about 23% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Specialty Business Services sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 30 Specialty Business Services companies on this page is 26.8×, measured on the 26 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Specialty Business Services sector performing?

12 of the 29 covered Specialty Business Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 4.4% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Specialty Business Services stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 30 listed Specialty Business Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI