Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
$1.8B
—
—
—
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$3.6B
—
$3.9B
$3.2B
$3.5B
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Specialty Business Services Stocks
Specialty Business Services: Cintas Corporation owns the largest revenue base; Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Specialty Business Services moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 2% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 1% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 9 weeks running.
FADING · −3 in 4w~Moving with the index13 of 30 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months3 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑9w · 14/30 >200d (−7) · 13/30 lead (−3) · EPS 17/29↑
Specialty Business Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Specialty Business Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Specialty Business Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 30 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Specialty Business Services outperforming S&P 500?
Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 9.1% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 5.4%. 12 of 30 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. BUUU Group Limited is the strongest against the sector itself at +166.1%.
+5.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+9.1%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
12/30Stocks leading S&P 500
10/30Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 9.1% over 52 weeks and 5.4% over 13 weeks. 12 of 30 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 30 beat the sector itself. Cintas Corporation leads with revenue of $11,264 million, based on 21 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$335.5B
Cintas Corporation
Revenue growing
15/20
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
12/30
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 30
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
ABM Industries Incorporated has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.
CBIZ, Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
CBIZ, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1ABM Industries IncorporatedABM | 63.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.4/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.1 pp 95% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 3.8% 76% evidence | 15.4/20 P/E 15.7× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y 11.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 11.1 + 15.4 + 15.3 = 63.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2First Advantage CorporationFA | 61.2/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 24.3/35 Revenue 53.4% · PAT — · OPM change 6.6 pp 62% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 8.7% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 294× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.0/20 RS sector 26.2% · RS bench 32% · 1Y 40.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 9.3 + 8.6 + 19 = 61.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Cintas CorporationCTAS | 58.4/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.1/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT 10.4% · OPM change 0.8 pp 95% evidence | 16.9/25 ROCE 8.4% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 34.9× · PEG 3.08 65% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -5.8% · RS bench -0.9% · 1Y -0.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 16.9 + 6.1 + 11.3 = 58.4 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 4CBIZ, Inc.CBZ | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.6/35 Revenue 14.4% · PAT 9.2% · OPM change -3.8 pp 95% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 5% 76% evidence | 15.2/20 P/E 15× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 14.2% · RS bench 20.5% · 1Y 1.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 8.5 + 15.2 + 18.7 = 58 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 5AramarkARMK | 56.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 4.5% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 13.4% · RS bench 18.6% · 1Y 53.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.7 + 12.1 + 9.8 + 14.9 = 56.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Maximus, Inc.MMS | 54.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT 23.9% · OPM change 0.2 pp 83% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 9.6× · PEG 0.29 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -30.1% · RS bench -26.1% · 1Y -35.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 14.4 + 16.3 + 5.4 = 54.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Thomson Reuters CorporationTRI | 54.3/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.0/35 Revenue 7% · PAT 5% · OPM change 4.2 pp 95% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 28.6% 76% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG 4.61 65% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -18.6% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y -37.8%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24 + 15.4 + 5.6 + 9.3 = 54.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Quad/Graphics, Inc.QUAD | 53.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | LEADER | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.1 pp 45% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 3% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 13.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 19% · RS bench 24.2% · 1Y 46.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 9.1 + 11 + 16.1 = 53.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Copart, Inc.CPRT | 52.7/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 18.3/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT 5% · OPM change 0.2 pp 95% evidence | 20.7/25 ROCE 18.9% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 20.5× · PEG 3.47 65% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -24.1% · RS bench -19.8% · 1Y -32.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.3 + 20.7 + 6.6 + 7.1 = 52.7 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 10Global Payments Inc.GPN | 51.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.3/35 Revenue 32.5% · PAT -157.1% · OPM change -12.3 pp 95% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 16.1% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E -21.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench 5% · 1Y -0.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 13.7 + 11.5 + 14.8 = 51.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 11Dolby Laboratories, Inc.DLB | 49.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 28.5% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -11.2% · 1Y -17.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 13.3 + 10.1 + 9.3 = 49.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Cass Information Systems, Inc.CASS | 48.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.1 pp 45% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -37% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 18.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.1/20 RS sector 6.5% · RS bench 11.6% · 1Y 33.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 4.5 + 10.7 + 16.1 = 48.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Eastman Kodak CompanyKODK | 48.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.2/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT -317.5% · OPM change 4.9 pp 62% evidence | 6.7/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -0.4% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 12.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.5/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 1.6% · 1Y 52.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 6.7 + 11.2 + 10.5 = 48.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14AZZ Inc.AZZ | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT -23.9% · OPM change 0.7 pp 95% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 17.2% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 20.7× · PEG 1.43 65% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -7% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 16.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 13.8 + 11 + 6 = 47.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15Transcat, Inc.TRNS | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue 18.6% · PAT -61.5% · OPM change -4.2 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 4.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 125.1× · PEG 1.35 65% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench 4.8% · 1Y 10.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 9.8 + 10 + 12.5 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16UL Solutions Inc.ULS | 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.2/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT 4.2% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 18.2% 76% evidence | 4.9/20 P/E 50.1× · PEG 4 65% evidence | 1.0/20 RS sector -31.1% · RS bench -27.7% · 1Y -5.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 16.1 + 4.9 + 1 = 44.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17UniFirst CorporationUNF | 44.1/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | FADING | 10.0/35 Revenue 1.4% · PAT -24.3% · OPM change -4.3 pp 95% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 41.9× · PEG 1.23 65% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 3% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 58%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 10.1 + 11.5 + 12.5 = 44.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Cimpress plcCMPR | 43.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.4 pp 45% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -8.7% · RS bench -4.4% · 1Y 30.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 11.2 + 10 + 5.9 = 43.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19RB Global, Inc.RBA | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.2/35 Revenue 9.5% · PAT 7.3% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence | 4.4/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG 7.47 65% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -27% · RS bench -23.2% · 1Y -29.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 15.6 + 4.4 + 2.8 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Amentum Holdings, Inc.AMTM | 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.4 pp 45% evidence | 8.7/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 45.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.9/20 RS sector -31.5% · RS bench -27.9% · 1Y -11.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 8.7 + 9.3 + 1.9 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21TIC Solutions, Inc.TIC | 38.0/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | FADING | 14.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2 pp 39% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE -1% · OPM -6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector -17.7% · RS bench -13.1% · 1Y -38.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 4.7 + 10 + 8.4 = 38 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Target Hospitality Corp.TH | 37.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.2/35 Revenue -7.4% · PAT -197.8% · OPM change -18.2 pp 62% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -2.9% · OPM -19.7% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 40.3% · RS bench 45.6% · 1Y 116.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 5.7 + 9.1 + 13.9 = 37.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 45.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 23LegalZoom.com, Inc.LZ | 35.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 10.6/35 Revenue 12.9% · PAT -60% · OPM change -3.6 pp 83% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 1.3% 76% evidence | 12.2/20 P/E 94.5× · PEG 0.93 65% evidence | 3.9/20 RS sector -30.3% · RS bench -26.2% · 1Y -44.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.6 + 8.3 + 12.2 + 3.9 = 35 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24BrightView Holdings, Inc.BV | 33.8/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.1/35 Revenue 0% · PAT 2.2% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 103.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -23.9% · RS bench -19.9% · 1Y -18.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.1 + 7.2 + 8.8 + 5.7 = 33.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.RHLD | 33.0/100Adverse evidence62% evidence | FADING | 11.1/35 Revenue 82.2% · PAT -83.2% · OPM change -26 pp 83% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -27.2% · RS bench -23.4% · 1Y 71.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.1 + 7.3 + 10 + 4.6 = 33 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26BlackSky Technology Inc.BKSY | 28.1/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BASING | 9.1/35 Revenue -9.3% · PAT — · OPM change -48.7 pp 62% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -89.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -25% · RS bench -21.6% · 1Y 2.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.1 + 3.8 + 10 + 5.2 = 28.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Spire Global, Inc.SPIR | 24.8/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.2/35 Revenue -36% · PAT — · OPM change -36.7 pp 62% evidence | 3.1/25 ROCE -30.4% · OPM -155.2% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -20.5% · RS bench -17.1% · 1Y 9.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.2 + 3.1 + 11.4 + 3.1 = 24.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28RELX PLCRELX | 54.5/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | TURNING | 19.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.8/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -27.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 15.8 + 10.6 + 8.8 = 54.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29BUUU Group LimitedBUUU | 48.7/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence | LEADER | 16.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE -13.1% · OPM — 46% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 543.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 166.1% · RS bench 175% · 1Y 489.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16 + 7.2 + 8.5 + 17 = 48.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30Rentokil Initial plcRTO | 41.1/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | BASING | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 12% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM — 61% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.7/20 RS sector -33.2% · RS bench -29.8% · 1Y -10.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 12.4 + 9.9 + 0.7 = 41.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 30 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
BUUU Group Limited has the strongest one-year price move in Specialty Business Services at +489.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +175%. 12 of 30 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Specialty Business Services itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Cintas Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at $11,264 million. Global Payments Inc. is next at $10,232 million. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 82.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 21 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Cintas Corporation is the scale leader at $11,264 million, 10.1% ahead of Global Payments Inc.. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s growth is 82.2% from a $767 million base, with 9 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCintas Corporation · $11,264 million
Gap10.1% versus #2 · Global Payments Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/30 companies · 513 observations
Investor read: Cintas Corporation is the scale benchmark; Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Cintas Corporation's growth falls below Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
21/30 level · 20/30 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aramark ARMK | $4.9B | 6.1% | Jun 2026 |
| RELX PLC RELX | $4.9B | 2.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Rentokil Initial plc RTO | $3.5B | 5.8% | Jun 2026 |
| Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM | $3.5B | -2.3% | Jun 2026 |
| Global Payments Inc. GPN | $3.3B | 69% | Jun 2026 |
| Cintas Corporation CTAS | $2.9B | 8.9% | Jun 2026 |
| ABM Industries Incorporated ABM | $2.3B | 8.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI | $2.0B | 9.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Maximus, Inc. MMS | $1.3B | -4.1% | Mar 2026 |
| Copart, Inc. CPRT | $1.2B | 2.1% | Jun 2026 |
| RB Global, Inc. RBA | $888M | 15% | Mar 2026 |
| Cimpress plc CMPR | $886M | 12% | Jun 2026 |
| UL Solutions Inc. ULS | $758M | 7.5% | Mar 2026 |
| BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV | $703M | 6.0% | Mar 2026 |
| CBIZ, Inc. CBZ | $682M | -0.2% | Jun 2026 |
| UniFirst Corporation UNF | $634M | 3.8% | Jun 2026 |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD | $581M | -7.6% | Jun 2026 |
| TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC | $488M | 109% | Mar 2026 |
| AZZ Inc. AZZ | $449M | 6.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD | $408M | 292% | Mar 2026 |
| Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB | $396M | 7.0% | Jun 2026 |
| First Advantage Corporation FA | $385M | 8.5% | Mar 2026 |
| Eastman Kodak Company KODK | $265M | 7.3% | Mar 2026 |
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ | $207M | 13% | Mar 2026 |
| Transcat, Inc. TRNS | $89M | 16% | Mar 2026 |
| Target Hospitality Corp. TH | $73M | 4.3% | Mar 2026 |
| Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS | $28M | 0.0% | Jun 2026 |
| BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY | $21M | -30% | Mar 2026 |
| Spire Global, Inc. SPIR | $16M | -33% | Mar 2026 |
| BUUU Group Limited BUUU | $3M | 0.0% | Dec 2025 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Aramark · ARMK
$3.0B
$3.6B
—
$3.9B
$4.1B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$4.1B
$4.2B
$4.4B
$4.2B
$4.4B
$4.4B
$4.6B
$4.3B
$4.6B
—
$5.0B
$4.8B
$4.9B
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
$1.9B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.7B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.9B
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
$749M
$810M
$867M
$940M
$883M
$893M
$957M
$1.0B
$998M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
$285M
$352M
—
$334M
$290M
$335M
$376M
$298M
$291M
$316M
$365M
$289M
$305M
$357M
$370M
$316M
$307M
$347M
$396M
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$3.0B
$3.3B
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
$330M
$359M
$394M
$485M
$412M
$444M
$512M
$1.1B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$982M
$1.1B
$770M
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$888M
—
RELX PLC · RELX
—
$3.9B
—
$4.0B
—
$4.6B
—
$4.5B
—
$4.7B
—
$4.6B
—
$4.8B
—
$4.7B
—
$4.8B
—
$4.9B
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
$2.0B
—
$1.9B
—
$2.6B
—
$3.4B
—
$3.5B
—
$3.3B
—
$3.4B
—
$3.4B
—
$3.5B
—
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.0B
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
$649M
$623M
$645M
$623M
$629M
$629M
$689M
$676M
$684M
$670M
$730M
$731M
$739M
$705M
$776M
$783M
$789M
$758M
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
$465M
$486M
$487M
$512M
$516M
$542M
$543M
$577M
$572M
$594M
$591M
$603M
$640M
$605M
$602M
$611M
$614M
$621M
$623M
$634M
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.6%
—
—
—
72%
70%
66%
—
15%
-7.3%
-2.3%
Aramark · ARMK
—
—
—
—
38%
10%
—
5.0%
1.8%
13%
7.3%
8.0%
5.2%
3.3%
1.9%
5.7%
—
11%
13%
6.1%
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
—
—
—
13%
14%
13%
12%
10%
8.1%
9.3%
9.9%
8.2%
6.8%
7.8%
8.4%
8.0%
8.6%
9.3%
8.9%
8.9%
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
—
—
—
—
18%
10%
10%
8.7%
13%
14%
6.6%
10%
7.1%
12%
14%
7.5%
5.2%
0.7%
-3.5%
2.1%
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
—
—
—
16%
1.8%
-4.8%
—
-11%
0.3%
-5.7%
-2.9%
-3.0%
4.8%
13%
1.4%
9.3%
0.7%
-2.8%
7.0%
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
—
—
—
6.7%
3.8%
2.7%
6.3%
7.5%
8.4%
8.0%
-20%
-20%
-19%
-21%
-0.8%
-0.1%
0.5%
0.0%
63%
69%
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
—
—
—
22%
25%
24%
30%
128%
148%
134%
108%
-1.0%
-3.7%
9.7%
-28%
8.2%
11%
5.3%
15%
—
RELX PLC · RELX
—
6.7%
—
17%
—
19%
—
13%
—
1.7%
—
3.2%
—
2.8%
—
2.2%
—
1.2%
—
2.7%
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
-11%
—
-5.0%
—
30%
—
77%
—
34%
—
-3.6%
—
-3.0%
—
3.0%
—
5.8%
—
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
—
—
—
5.4%
3.2%
3.2%
3.8%
2.0%
1.3%
2.8%
8.5%
5.7%
8.2%
5.2%
0.8%
2.6%
3.4%
5.2%
9.8%
9.5%
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
8.2%
—
—
-3.1%
1.0%
6.8%
8.5%
8.7%
6.5%
6.0%
8.1%
8.0%
5.2%
6.3%
7.1%
6.8%
7.5%
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
—
—
—
11%
12%
12%
13%
11%
9.6%
8.8%
4.5%
12%
1.9%
1.9%
1.3%
-4.1%
2.6%
3.5%
3.8%
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Copart, Inc. has the highest OPM among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 37.5%. Thomson Reuters Corporation is next at 28.6%. First Advantage Corporation has the highest Margin change at +6.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Copart, Inc. leads opm at 37.5%; First Advantage Corporation leads margin change at +6.6 percentage points.
LeaderCopart, Inc. · 37.5%
Gap31.1% versus #2 · Thomson Reuters Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/30 companies · 489 observations
Investor read: Copart, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
27/30 level · 27/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copart, Inc. CPRT | 38% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI | 29% | +4.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB | 29% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cintas Corporation CTAS | 23% | +0.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| UL Solutions Inc. ULS | 18% | +2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| RB Global, Inc. RBA | 18% | +0.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| AZZ Inc. AZZ | 17% | +0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Global Payments Inc. GPN | 16% | −12.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Maximus, Inc. MMS | 11% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| First Advantage Corporation FA | 8.7% | +6.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cimpress plc CMPR | 5.5% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CBIZ, Inc. CBZ | 5.0% | −3.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Transcat, Inc. TRNS | 4.8% | −4.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Aramark ARMK | 4.5% | +0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM | 4.3% | +1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ABM Industries Incorporated ABM | 3.8% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| UniFirst Corporation UNF | 3.6% | −4.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD | 3.0% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV | 2.3% | −1.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ | 1.3% | −3.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Eastman Kodak Company KODK | -0.4% | +4.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD | -1.4% | −26.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC | -6.0% | −2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Target Hospitality Corp. TH | -20% | −18.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS | -37% | −7.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY | -89% | −48.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Spire Global, Inc. SPIR | -155% | −36.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
-7.1%
—
—
—
4.3%
4.3%
4.2%
1.2%
3.9%
3.2%
2.9%
—
3.4%
4.3%
4.3%
Aramark · ARMK
2.5%
3.7%
—
3.7%
3.6%
3.9%
3.2%
3.3%
5.1%
3.8%
3.8%
3.7%
5.0%
4.8%
4.1%
3.9%
—
4.3%
4.5%
4.5%
AZZ Inc. · AZZ
15%
16%
13%
14%
16%
12%
11%
17%
15%
14%
12%
17%
17%
15%
12%
17%
16%
16%
15%
17%
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
21%
20%
21%
20%
20%
21%
20%
21%
21%
21%
22%
22%
22%
23%
23%
22%
23%
23%
23%
23%
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
40%
41%
40%
40%
37%
35%
38%
41%
39%
39%
37%
39%
34%
35%
37%
37%
37%
37%
35%
38%
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
14%
26%
—
13%
16%
28%
29%
5.3%
-1.2%
21%
30%
13%
15%
22%
29%
15%
9.7%
18%
29%
—
First Advantage Corporation · FA
13%
12%
9.0%
11%
13%
14%
6.4%
9.5%
12%
15%
-0.4%
5.4%
4.6%
-26%
2.1%
9.7%
10%
11%
8.7%
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
21%
22%
20%
23%
24%
22%
18%
23%
26%
25%
24%
27%
33%
26%
25%
28%
32%
28%
13%
16%
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
16%
15%
59%
19%
15%
15%
-4.9%
16%
14%
16%
19%
18%
16%
18%
17%
16%
15%
15%
18%
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
19%
15%
25%
24%
25%
36%
29%
50%
28%
31%
30%
24%
24%
38%
30%
24%
33%
27%
31%
29%
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
13%
17%
16%
19%
15%
12%
17%
13%
13%
14%
17%
18%
16%
16%
18%
20%
15%
18%
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
9.7%
9.2%
4.6%
6.6%
6.4%
8.0%
3.8%
5.8%
6.3%
9.0%
4.7%
8.0%
8.4%
9.2%
5.2%
7.9%
8.1%
7.3%
4.2%
3.6%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+11.4 pp
—
—
—
−0.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.3 pp
—
−0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.4 pp
Aramark · ARMK
—
—
—
—
+1.1 pp
+0.2 pp
—
−0.4 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
—
−0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
AZZ Inc. · AZZ
—
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.9 pp
+3.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.7 pp
0.0 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+3.3 pp
+0.7 pp
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
—
—
—
—
−3.5 pp
−5.8 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.3 pp
+2.4 pp
+4.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.2 pp
−5.6 pp
−3.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.2 pp
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
—
—
—
−6.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.3 pp
—
−7.7 pp
−16.9 pp
−7.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+7.4 pp
+16.4 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.4 pp
−5.5 pp
−4.5 pp
−0.7 pp
—
First Advantage Corporation · FA
—
—
—
+1.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.6 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−6.8 pp
−4.1 pp
−7.0 pp
−40.8 pp
+2.5 pp
+4.3 pp
+5.7 pp
+37.0 pp
+6.6 pp
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
—
—
—
+5.7 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.7 pp
+6.2 pp
+3.8 pp
+7.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.6 pp
−1.2 pp
+2.0 pp
−12.9 pp
−12.3 pp
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
—
—
—
−3.7 pp
−0.9 pp
0.0 pp
−64.0 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+23.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.7 pp
−1.6 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.4 pp
+0.5 pp
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
—
—
—
+3.6 pp
+6.8 pp
+20.8 pp
+4.5 pp
+25.9 pp
+2.4 pp
−5.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−26.2 pp
−3.6 pp
+7.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+9.2 pp
−10.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.2 pp
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
+4.3 pp
—
—
+1.7 pp
−4.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.6 pp
+2.7 pp
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
—
—
—
−3.3 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.0 pp
−4.3 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Cintas Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at $1,999 million. Thomson Reuters Corporation is next at $1,711 million. ABM Industries Incorporated has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Cintas Corporation leads with $1,999 million of TTM profit, 16.8% above Thomson Reuters Corporation. ABM Industries Incorporated shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (101.3% uncapped) growth from a $159 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderCintas Corporation · $1,999 million
Gap16.8% versus #2 · Thomson Reuters Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/30 companies · 514 observations
Investor read: Cintas Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
21/30 level · 15/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| RELX PLC RELX | $1.2B | 20% | Jun 2026 |
| Cintas Corporation CTAS | $511M | 14% | Jun 2026 |
| Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI | $448M | 49% | Jun 2026 |
| Copart, Inc. CPRT | $402M | -1.2% | Jun 2026 |
| Rentokil Initial plc RTO | $126M | 7.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Aramark ARMK | $102M | 42% | Jun 2026 |
| RB Global, Inc. RBA | $98M | 24% | Mar 2026 |
| Maximus, Inc. MMS | $98M | 1.0% | Mar 2026 |
| UL Solutions Inc. ULS | $97M | 37% | Mar 2026 |
| Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB | $95M | 3.3% | Jun 2026 |
| Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM | $54M | 2,100% | Jun 2026 |
| AZZ Inc. AZZ | $52M | -70% | Jun 2026 |
| ABM Industries Incorporated ABM | $43M | 2.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Global Payments Inc. GPN | $29M | -88% | Jun 2026 |
| UniFirst Corporation UNF | $20M | -50% | Jun 2026 |
| CBIZ, Inc. CBZ | $19M | -55% | Jun 2026 |
| Cimpress plc CMPR | $15M | -21% | Jun 2026 |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD | $6M | 0.0% | Jun 2026 |
| First Advantage Corporation FA | $2M | -100% | Mar 2026 |
| BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV | $2M | -67% | Mar 2026 |
| Transcat, Inc. TRNS | $2M | -50% | Mar 2026 |
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ | $1M | -80% | Mar 2026 |
| Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS | $0M | -100% | Jun 2026 |
| BUUU Group Limited BUUU | $-1M | — | Dec 2025 |
| Target Hospitality Corp. TH | $-13M | -215% | Mar 2026 |
| Eastman Kodak Company KODK | $-16M | -515% | Mar 2026 |
| Spire Global, Inc. SPIR | $-26M | -129% | Mar 2026 |
| BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY | $-30M | -1,400% | Mar 2026 |
| TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC | $-42M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD | $-93M | -504% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
$-212M
—
—
—
$-39M
$-42M
$-24M
$22M
$21M
$2M
$-1M
—
$37M
$44M
$54M
Aramark · ARMK
$33M
$34M
—
$36M
$40M
$38M
$14M
$287M
$108M
$29M
$53M
$58M
$134M
$106M
$62M
$72M
—
$128M
$97M
$102M
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
$331M
$295M
$315M
$294M
$352M
$324M
$326M
$346M
$385M
$375M
$398M
$414M
$452M
$448M
$463M
$448M
$491M
$495M
$502M
$511M
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
$256M
$260M
$287M
$279M
$264M
$246M
$294M
$350M
$348M
$333M
$326M
$382M
$323M
$362M
$387M
$407M
$396M
$404M
$351M
$402M
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
$44M
$80M
—
$37M
$40M
$79M
$96M
$16M
$10M
$68M
$98M
$40M
$59M
$68M
$92M
$47M
$50M
$54M
$95M
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
$305M
$217M
$250M
$-665M
$300M
$259M
$-4M
$284M
$377M
$372M
$323M
$389M
$334M
$598M
$313M
$246M
$661M
$237M
$-1.8B
$29M
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
$32M
$31M
$178M
$53M
$43M
$45M
$-28M
$87M
$63M
$84M
$107M
$111M
$76M
$118M
$79M
$110M
$95M
$109M
$98M
—
RELX PLC · RELX
—
$810M
—
$760M
—
$872M
—
$873M
—
$915M
—
$986M
—
$958M
—
$979M
—
$1.1B
—
$1.2B
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
$191M
—
$151M
—
$130M
—
$235M
—
$250M
—
$229M
—
$117M
—
$164M
—
$126M
—
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
$431M
$300M
$220M
$754M
$790M
$59M
$167M
$470M
$544M
$390M
$472M
$783M
$285M
$612M
$431M
$301M
$441M
$338M
$484M
$448M
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
$72M
$89M
$65M
$73M
$82M
$58M
$99M
$57M
$62M
$60M
$106M
$94M
$85M
$71M
$97M
$106M
$71M
$97M
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
$35M
$34M
$18M
$25M
$26M
$34M
$18M
$24M
$28M
$42M
$20M
$38M
$45M
$43M
$24M
$40M
$41M
$34M
$20M
$20M
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
76%
2,100%
—
Aramark · ARMK
—
—
—
—
21%
12%
—
697%
170%
-24%
279%
-80%
24%
266%
17%
24%
—
21%
56%
42%
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
—
—
—
9.7%
6.3%
9.8%
3.5%
18%
9.4%
16%
22%
20%
17%
19%
16%
8.2%
8.6%
10%
8.4%
14%
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
—
—
—
—
3.1%
-5.4%
2.4%
25%
32%
35%
11%
9.1%
-7.2%
8.7%
19%
6.5%
23%
12%
-9.3%
-1.2%
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
—
—
—
-33%
-9.1%
-1.3%
—
-57%
-75%
-14%
2.1%
150%
490%
0.0%
-6.1%
18%
-15%
-21%
3.3%
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
—
—
—
-393%
-1.6%
19%
-102%
—
26%
44%
—
37%
-11%
61%
-3.1%
-37%
98%
-60%
-668%
-88%
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
—
—
—
-13%
34%
45%
-116%
64%
47%
87%
—
28%
21%
40%
-26%
-0.9%
25%
-7.6%
24%
—
RELX PLC · RELX
—
22%
—
15%
—
7.7%
—
15%
—
4.9%
—
13%
—
4.7%
—
-0.7%
—
15%
—
20%
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
-2.6%
—
-8.5%
—
-32%
—
56%
—
92%
—
-2.6%
—
-53%
—
-28%
—
7.7%
—
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
—
—
—
—
83%
-80%
-24%
-38%
-31%
561%
183%
67%
-48%
57%
-8.7%
-62%
55%
-45%
12%
49%
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
98%
—
—
14%
-35%
52%
-22%
-24%
3.5%
7.1%
65%
37%
18%
-8.5%
13%
-16%
37%
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
—
—
—
-26%
0.0%
0.0%
-4.0%
7.7%
24%
11%
58%
61%
2.4%
20%
5.3%
-8.9%
-21%
-17%
-50%
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Copart, Inc. has the highest ROCE among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 18.9%. RELX PLC is next at 9.3%. Cass Information Systems, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +1.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Copart, Inc. leads ROCE at 18.9%, 9.6 percentage points above RELX PLC. Cass Information Systems, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +1.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderCopart, Inc. · 18.9%
Gap103.2% versus #2 · RELX PLC
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 544 observations
Investor read: Copart, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
30/30 level · 30/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copart, Inc. CPRT | 19% | +0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| RELX PLC RELX | 9.3% | +0.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cintas Corporation CTAS | 8.4% | +0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| RB Global, Inc. RBA | 7.5% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| UL Solutions Inc. ULS | 6.7% | +1.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cimpress plc CMPR | 4.9% | −0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Global Payments Inc. GPN | 4.2% | −1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Maximus, Inc. MMS | 4.2% | −0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI | 3.9% | +1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| AZZ Inc. AZZ | 3.9% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD | 2.2% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Aramark ARMK | 2.1% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ABM Industries Incorporated ABM | 2.1% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Rentokil Initial plc RTO | 1.8% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM | 1.6% | +0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ | 1.5% | −3.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB | 1.2% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Transcat, Inc. TRNS | 1.1% | −1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| UniFirst Corporation UNF | 0.9% | −1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| First Advantage Corporation FA | 0.9% | +0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CBIZ, Inc. CBZ | 0.8% | −1.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV | 0.6% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Eastman Kodak Company KODK | -0.1% | +0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. RHLD | -0.2% | −15.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| TIC Solutions, Inc. TIC | -1.0% | −0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Target Hospitality Corp. TH | -2.9% | −2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS | -3.2% | +1.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY | -6.5% | −1.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| BUUU Group Limited BUUU | -13% | −63.6 pp | Dec 2025 |
| Spire Global, Inc. SPIR | -30% | −8.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
0.0%
0.0%
—
—
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
—
1.2%
0.4%
1.8%
2.2%
1.1%
—
1.4%
1.3%
1.6%
Aramark · ARMK
—
1.1%
—
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
1.0%
1.1%
1.8%
1.5%
1.4%
1.5%
2.2%
2.3%
1.7%
1.9%
—
2.4%
2.2%
2.1%
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
6.3%
6.0%
6.5%
6.2%
7.2%
7.0%
7.1%
6.7%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.5%
7.7%
8.0%
7.9%
7.7%
8.0%
8.5%
8.2%
8.4%
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
27%
28%
28%
27%
28%
27%
25%
24%
24%
23%
22%
22%
20%
19%
19%
18%
18%
18%
17%
19%
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
1.5%
3.2%
—
1.6%
1.7%
3.6%
4.1%
0.6%
-0.1%
2.6%
4.3%
1.4%
1.8%
3.0%
4.0%
1.8%
1.1%
2.3%
4.1%
1.2%
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
3.9%
4.3%
4.5%
5.0%
5.1%
5.2%
4.6%
4.6%
4.9%
5.2%
5.4%
5.3%
5.4%
5.2%
5.3%
5.4%
5.5%
4.8%
4.3%
4.2%
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
15%
9.0%
9.8%
14%
14%
16%
3.3%
4.5%
5.5%
6.4%
7.5%
7.3%
7.3%
7.5%
7.3%
7.2%
7.2%
7.2%
7.5%
—
RELX PLC · RELX
5.2%
5.2%
5.3%
5.3%
6.0%
6.0%
6.5%
6.5%
6.8%
6.8%
7.7%
7.7%
7.6%
7.6%
8.4%
8.4%
8.5%
8.5%
9.3%
9.3%
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
3.1%
3.1%
2.1%
2.1%
1.4%
1.4%
2.4%
2.4%
2.0%
2.0%
1.9%
1.9%
1.5%
1.5%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.5%
1.8%
1.8%
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
1.6%
1.5%
2.0%
1.9%
2.1%
3.5%
2.7%
4.7%
2.7%
3.5%
3.4%
2.7%
2.7%
4.7%
3.7%
2.9%
4.1%
3.7%
4.3%
3.9%
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
0.0%
2.9%
10%
—
4.8%
3.8%
3.7%
11%
4.4%
4.2%
4.5%
6.1%
6.1%
5.6%
5.4%
6.7%
7.3%
5.6%
6.7%
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
2.1%
1.1%
1.6%
1.5%
2.0%
0.9%
1.5%
1.6%
2.3%
1.2%
2.1%
2.3%
2.3%
1.3%
2.0%
2.0%
1.8%
1.0%
0.9%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
—
—
+1.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.7 pp
—
−0.1 pp
—
−0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.5 pp
Aramark · ARMK
—
—
—
—
—
+0.1 pp
—
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
—
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
—
—
—
—
+0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.7 pp
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
—
—
—
—
+0.8 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.8 pp
−4.4 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.0 pp
−3.4 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.1 pp
+0.7 pp
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
—
—
—
—
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
—
−1.0 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
—
—
—
—
+1.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.5 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.2 pp
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
+6.5 pp
−6.5 pp
−9.6 pp
−8.9 pp
−9.1 pp
+4.2 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
—
RELX PLC · RELX
—
—
—
—
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
—
—
—
−1.7 pp
−1.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.6 pp
0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.0 pp
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
—
—
+4.8 pp
+0.9 pp
−6.6 pp
—
−0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
−5.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
0.0 pp
+1.3 pp
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
—
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.1 pp
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Maximus, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 30 Specialty Business Services companies compared here, at 0.29×. ABM Industries Incorporated is next at 0.38×. Global Payments Inc. has the lowest P/E at -21.2×, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Maximus, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29×, 23.7% below ABM Industries Incorporated. Only 12 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderMaximus, Inc. · 0.29×
Gap23.7% versus #2 · ABM Industries Incorporated
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/30 companies · 80 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
12/30 level · 27/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| RB Global, Inc. RBA | 7.5 | 44.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI | 4.6 | 21.7 | Jun 2026 |
| UL Solutions Inc. ULS | 4.0 | 50.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Copart, Inc. CPRT | 3.5 | 20.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Cintas Corporation CTAS | 3.1 | 34.9 | Jun 2026 |
| AZZ Inc. AZZ | 1.4 | 20.7 | Jun 2026 |
| Transcat, Inc. TRNS | 1.4 | 125.1 | Mar 2026 |
| UniFirst Corporation UNF | 1.2 | 41.9 | Jun 2026 |
| Cass Information Systems, Inc. CASS | 1.1 | 18.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Dolby Laboratories, Inc. DLB | 1.1 | 22.8 | Jun 2026 |
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. LZ | 0.9 | 94.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Aramark ARMK | 0.7 | 32.0 | Jun 2026 |
| CBIZ, Inc. CBZ | 0.7 | 15.0 | Jun 2026 |
| Target Hospitality Corp. TH | 0.4 | 71.2 | Mar 2026 |
| ABM Industries Incorporated ABM | 0.4 | 15.7 | Jun 2026 |
| Global Payments Inc. GPN | 0.3 | -21.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Maximus, Inc. MMS | 0.3 | 9.6 | Mar 2026 |
| Eastman Kodak Company KODK | 0.2 | 12.9 | Mar 2026 |
| RELX PLC RELX | — | 19.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Rentokil Initial plc RTO | — | 30.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Amentum Holdings, Inc. AMTM | — | 45.1 | Jun 2026 |
| First Advantage Corporation FA | — | 294.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Cimpress plc CMPR | — | 26.8 | Jun 2026 |
| BrightView Holdings, Inc. BV | — | 103.1 | Mar 2026 |
| BUUU Group Limited BUUU | — | 543.3 | Dec 2025 |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD | — | 13.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Spire Global, Inc. SPIR | — | 8.3 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 18 companies with a series here. The remaining 6 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
ABM Industries Incorporated · ABM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
1.1
0.9
0.3
0.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Aramark · ARMK
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
—
—
—
—
AZZ Inc. · AZZ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.5
3.2
3.4
3.5
4.4
3.1
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.8
1.4
1.4
1.9
3.9
—
5.3
5.7
1.9
1.7
3.4
3.5
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.1
—
—
—
—
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
—
0.7
—
0.3
—
—
—
Maximus, Inc. · MMS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
—
—
0.3
0.4
0.9
1.5
0.3
0.3
—
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
3.9
3.8
—
7.5
—
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
4.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.8
1.3
1.2
2.2
4.0
—
—
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.4
2.4
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.2
—
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. · AMTM
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
301.2
60.1
—
96.1
76.2
45.1
Aramark · ARMK
—
190.0
—
47.0
36.6
34.3
27.5
15.0
9.8
13.9
16.2
36.2
38.8
29.5
26.3
31.2
—
32.0
31.0
32.0
Cintas Corporation · CTAS
37.4
39.4
33.2
34.2
34.1
37.6
35.2
36.3
37.9
40.1
43.4
44.7
50.8
54.4
48.0
51.5
46.6
40.2
42.4
34.9
Copart, Inc. · CPRT
37.1
37.0
28.1
24.9
27.9
25.5
29.3
32.7
34.1
31.6
34.0
37.6
37.0
35.6
38.4
39.9
28.2
26.1
25.2
20.5
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. · DLB
31.1
39.0
—
38.2
36.5
38.1
34.6
37.2
38.7
44.7
42.7
36.2
28.1
28.9
30.2
27.1
27.6
26.5
22.9
22.8
Global Payments Inc. · GPN
49.3
40.6
38.0
—
423.9
240.9
—
32.1
34.3
33.5
26.0
17.5
19.1
18.2
15.4
13.7
11.5
13.1
—
-21.3
RB Global, Inc. · RBA
40.0
44.6
21.6
24.5
22.7
20.1
—
83.1
79.5
70.2
45.6
42.5
43.6
44.6
49.1
52.1
51.4
50.0
44.1
—
RELX PLC · RELX
29.6
31.8
30.2
27.4
26.4
27.0
29.9
28.9
29.9
33.3
35.4
36.2
34.9
35.1
37.8
38.3
33.0
26.8
21.1
19.2
Rentokil Initial plc · RTO
—
42.2
—
—
—
44.0
50.0
51.3
43.7
30.5
32.3
32.0
29.3
32.7
31.2
34.6
31.2
31.8
33.7
30.3
Thomson Reuters Corporation · TRI
8.6
10.4
32.4
106.5
53.4
43.0
59.5
30.6
25.8
25.2
29.7
32.4
33.6
32.8
36.2
56.0
40.2
39.6
26.7
21.7
UL Solutions Inc. · ULS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31.5
32.7
30.8
33.8
45.0
42.4
49.3
50.1
—
UniFirst Corporation · UNF
—
25.6
26.7
28.0
33.5
34.9
35.9
31.4
31.5
28.7
27.3
23.7
24.4
25.7
26.7
23.2
22.3
22.8
31.8
41.9
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Specialty Business Services comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 30 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Specialty Business Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Specialty Business Services company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Specialty Business Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Specialty Business Services sector outperforming S&P 500?
Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 9.1% over 52 weeks and 5.4% over 13 weeks. 12 of 30 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 30 beat the sector itself.
Which Specialty Business Services company is largest by revenue?
Cintas Corporation leads with revenue of $11,264 million, based on 21 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Specialty Business Services company is growing fastest?
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 82.2%, across 20 of 30 comparable companies.
Which Specialty Business Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
ABM Industries Incorporated ranks first at 63.2/100 with 85.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Specialty Business Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Maximus, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.29, among 12 of 30 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Specialty Business Services comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Specialty Business Services company is the biggest?
Cintas Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $11,264 million, ahead of Global Payments Inc. at $10,232 million. That covers 21 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Specialty Business Services company has the best profit margins?
Copart, Inc. has the highest operating margin at 37.5%, from 27 of 30 comparable companies. First Advantage Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Specialty Business Services company makes the most profit?
Cintas Corporation earns the most, at $1,999 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 21 of 30 comparable companies. ABM Industries Incorporated has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Specialty Business Services company earns the highest return on capital?
Copart, Inc. leads on return on capital employed at 18.9%, across 30 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Specialty Business Services stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Maximus, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.29×. Only 12 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Specialty Business Services sector beating the market?
Specialty Business Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 9.1% over the last 52 weeks and 5.4% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 12 of 30 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Specialty Business Services stock has the strongest price momentum?
BUUU Group Limited has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Specialty Business Services company scores highest for research priority?
ABM Industries Incorporated scores 63.2 out of 100 with 85.3% evidence confidence, from 21.4 points on growth and earnings, 11.1 on capital efficiency, 15.4 on valuation and 15.3 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Specialty Business Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Specialty Business Services sector?
The 30 Specialty Business Services companies on this page carry $335,452 million of combined market value. Cintas Corporation is the largest at $79,924 million, about 24% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.
What is the Specialty Business Services sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 30 Specialty Business Services companies on this page is 30.3×, measured on the 26 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.
How is the Specialty Business Services sector performing?
12 of the 30 covered Specialty Business Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 9.1% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.
How many Specialty Business Services stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 30 listed Specialty Business Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!