Aura Minerals Inc.
AUGOAura Minerals Inc. is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 88th percentile of its own range says the market knows.
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 88th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.
The price is building a base (5 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 88th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 194% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Aura Minerals Inc. trades at $57.8, building a base and 5 weeks into that stage. That is −8.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 37% of a 52-week range of $28 to $109. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (13 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is building a base — week 5 of stage 1. At $57.8 it trades −8.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 37% of its 52-week range ($28–$109).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,831% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-08) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Aura Minerals Inc. trades at 52.5× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 13.5×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 52.5× is at the pricey end of its own range (88th percentile), against a long-run median of 13.5× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +106.1%/yr price move, ~+34.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+71.2 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Aura Minerals Inc. reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −133.3% at the trough to −40.0%, a 2-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 60.9%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +55.9% | +33.1% | — | — |
| Stock price | +137.6% | +106.1% | +34.5% | +45.9% |
4-Factor Sector Score
59.7/100 — rank 6 of 28 in Gold · 74% evidence confidence
Aura Minerals Inc. scores 59.7 out of 100 against the 28 companies it is compared with in Gold, ranking 6. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 22.1 + 17.5 + 8.2 + 11.9 = 59.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Aura Minerals Inc. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +137.5% year on year. That is the 11th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 21.7% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.1 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.9 B (+55.9% on the year), capping 4 years at 21.7% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +137.5% year on year — the 11th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +82.0% growth against the decade's 21.7% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +83.9% over the last 4 quarters against +61.0%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Aura Minerals Inc.'s operating margin is 55.3% in the Mar 26 quarter, +11.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 21.4% to 50.0%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 55.3%, +11.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 21.4%–50.0%, and FY25's 50.0% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +11.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +10.5 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Aura Minerals Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.1 B. That is 26.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.1 B. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.1 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 194% of Aura Minerals Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.3 B of operating cash against $−0.1 B of profit. After $0.2 B of capital spending, $0.1 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.3 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B, leaving free cash of $0.1 B after $0.2 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 194% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Aura Minerals Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Aura Minerals Inc. earns a ROE of −30% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +45.5 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is −8.7% net margin on 0.57× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is −30%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −8.7% net margin × 0.57× asset turns × 5.96× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −29.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 50.9% − 5.4% = a +45.5 pp spread. The 5.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Aura Minerals Inc. paid $1.87 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 164.0% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $0.66 for Dec 25. Against the current price of $57.8 that is a trailing yield of 3.24%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Aura Minerals Inc. paid $1.87 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $0.66 for Dec 25. That is up 164.0% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $57.8 the trailing twelve months work out to 3.24% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Aura Minerals Inc. carries total debt of $0.4 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 1.37. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.59 in FY21 to 1.52 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.4 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 1.37. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.59 (FY21) to 1.52 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
12.0% of Aura Minerals Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 3.8 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 12.0% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 3.8 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Aura Minerals Inc.: the Z-score reads 2.90. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.90 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.90.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Franco-Nevada CorporationFNV | 65.4/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.2/35 Revenue 71.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 20 pp 83% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 88.8% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 34.8× · PEG 1.31 65% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -11% · 1Y 27.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.2 + 14 + 10.2 + 16 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.WPM | 62.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 25.3/35 Revenue 88.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13.1 pp 83% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 74.9% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 33.1× · PEG 1.36 65% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 14.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 14.9 + 9.6 + 12.9 = 62.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Barrick Mining CorporationB | 62.2/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.6/35 Revenue 43.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 26.8 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 62.6% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 11.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y 63.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 13 + 10.2 + 14.4 = 62.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Fortuna Mining Corp.FSM | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.5/35 Revenue 50.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 52.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.7% · 1Y 37.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.5 + 13 + 11 + 13.1 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5IAMGOLD CorporationIAG | 60.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.4/35 Revenue 92.3% · PAT 47.3% · OPM change 29.2 pp 83% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 52.9% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y 97.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 12.7 + 15.7 + 7.4 = 60.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Aura Minerals Inc.this pageAUGO | 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue 83.2% · PAT — · OPM change 12.5 pp 62% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 20.8% · OPM 53.7% 76% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 75.6× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 10.6% · RS bench -8.9% · 1Y 120.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 17.5 + 8.2 + 11.9 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7OceanaGold CorporationOGC | 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue 62.5% · PAT 35.8% · OPM change -8.1 pp 83% evidence | 21.9/25 ROCE 42.7% · OPM 152.9% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y 52.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 21.9 + 11.2 + 7 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Royal Gold, Inc.RGLD | 57.7/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 70.7% · PAT 60.4% · OPM change — 45% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y 21.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 14.3 + 13.3 + 10.8 = 57.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Centerra Gold Inc.CGAU | 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.1 pp 45% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 22.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 4.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 30.9% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 158.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 7.3 + 11.4 + 19.7 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10B2Gold Corp.BTG | 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | BASING | 21.8/35 Revenue 86.9% · PAT — · OPM change 9.8 pp 62% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG 0.97 65% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 8.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 14 + 13 + 6.1 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11AngloGold Ashanti plcAU | 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.9 pp 45% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 55.9% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -14.7% · 1Y 41.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 8.7 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Newmont CorporationNEM | 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 61.1% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 41.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 11.5 + 10.1 + 14.7 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Aris Mining CorporationARIS | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 54.8% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 97.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 11.2 + 10.9 + 11.1 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14SSR Mining Inc.SSRM | 50.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue 75.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17.9 pp 83% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 51.6% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 28× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 75%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 8.1 + 6.7 + 12.2 = 50.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15OR Royalties Inc.OR | 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BASING | 21.7/35 Revenue 61.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 15.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 85.4% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -10.8% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 1.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 7.2 = 49.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Eldorado Gold CorporationEGO | 49.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.2 pp 45% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 51.4% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y 40.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 7.8 + 10.5 + 14.7 = 49.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Kinross Gold CorporationKGC | 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.5 pp 45% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y 24.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 5.3 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Orla Mining Ltd.ORLA | 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | 22.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 19.7/25 ROCE 34.3% · OPM 136.8% 76% evidence | 4.5/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 2.92 65% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -33.1% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 11 weeks ahead 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 19.7 + 4.5 + 2.3 = 49.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is -0.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 19Pan American Silver Corp.PAAS | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue 33.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 48.1% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector 0.5% · RS bench -15.6% · 1Y 40.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 9.5 + 9.5 + 8.3 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Coeur Mining, Inc.CDE | 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.5 pp 83% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 40.8% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y 39.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 6.1 + 9.8 + 8.2 = 47 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Agnico Eagle Mines LimitedAEM | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.7 pp 45% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 62.8% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -9.8% · RS bench -23.6% · 1Y 11.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 11.7 + 9.9 + 7.1 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Alamos Gold Inc.AGI | 45.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 29.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 57.8% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.9/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -30.8% · 1Y 9.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 12.5 + 10.6 + 1.9 = 45.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Equinox Gold Corp.EQX | 39.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT 98.7% · OPM change 48.8 pp 32% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 45.3% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y 48.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 7.8 + 9.4 + 1.3 = 39.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Hycroft Mining Holding CorporationHYMC | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.9 pp 52% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -10.1% · OPM -177.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector 10.2% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y 546.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 3 + 11.5 + 10.7 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Allied Gold CorporationAAUC | 28.2/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.8/35 Revenue 53% · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 62% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -14% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y 60.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.8 + 7.1 + 9.7 + 1.6 = 28.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Gold Fields LimitedGFI | 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BASING | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -27.1% · 1Y 9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.5 + 10.3 + 5 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Seabridge Gold Inc.SA | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 187.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y 66.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 15.5 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28NovaGold Resources Inc.NG | 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BASING | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -33.7% · 1Y 11.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 1.4 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s stock price today?
Aura Minerals Inc. trades at $57.8, +137.6% over the past year. The company is valued at $5.0 B. The stock sits at 37% of its 52-week range of $28–$109, −8.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 5 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Aura Minerals Inc.'s latest quarterly results?
Aura Minerals Inc. reported revenue of $0.4 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $1.13. The operating margin was 55.3%, 11.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s revenue?
Aura Minerals Inc. reported revenue of $0.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +137.5% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.9 B (+55.9%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 21.7% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s profit?
Aura Minerals Inc. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.1 B. The operating margin ran 55.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s market cap?
Aura Minerals Inc.'s market capitalisation is $5.0 B at a stock price of $57.8. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s P/E ratio?
Aura Minerals Inc. trades at a P/E of 52.5×, at the 88th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 13.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Aura Minerals Inc. pay a dividend?
Yes — Aura Minerals Inc. declared $0.66 per share for Dec 25, and $1.87 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 164.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s dividend per share?
Aura Minerals Inc.'s most recently declared dividend is $0.66 per share for Dec 25, giving $1.87 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s dividend yield?
Aura Minerals Inc.'s trailing dividend yield is 3.24%: $1.87 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $57.8. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Aura Minerals Inc. overvalued?
On its own history, Aura Minerals Inc. looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 52.5× sits at the 88th percentile of its 4-year range (long-run median 13.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Aura Minerals Inc. performing?
Aura Minerals Inc. is building a base, 5 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 13 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Aura Minerals Inc. in?
Turning around — profit growth swung from −133.3% at the trough to −40.0%, a 2-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 60.9%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +83.9% latest, profit growth −40.0% latest, eps growth −448.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Aura Minerals Inc. in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 5 of stage 1), trading −8.5% versus its 200-day average and at 37% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Aura Minerals Inc. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Aura Minerals Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-08), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,831% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Aura Minerals Inc.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Aura Minerals Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $57.8, the price is building a base 5 weeks in. Its P/E of 52.5× sits at the 88th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Aura Minerals Inc.?
Yes — short interest is 12.0% of Aura Minerals Inc.'s tradable float, about 3.8 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Aura Minerals Inc. have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Aura Minerals Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 1.43. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s capex?
Aura Minerals Inc. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.2 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Aura Minerals Inc.'s cash flow?
Aura Minerals Inc. generated $0.3 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.2 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Aura Minerals Inc.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 194% of Aura Minerals Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.3 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Aura Minerals Inc.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.90 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Aura Minerals Inc. in its business cycle?
Aura Minerals Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 50.0%, against a 5-year band of 21.4%–50.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 55.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Aura Minerals Inc. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 88th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Aura Minerals Inc. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Aura Minerals Inc. is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 88th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.