Gold Fields Limited
GFIGold Fields Limited's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +185.5% in a year against a +1.5% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +1.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is building a base (1 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +191.0% year on year, and 115% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Gold Fields Limited trades at $42.0, building a base and 1 weeks into that stage. That is −4.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 37% of a 52-week range of $32 to $59. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 5 straight weeks.
Today the stock is building a base — week 1 of stage 1. At $42.0 it trades −4.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 37% of its 52-week range ($32–$59).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +641% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 5 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Gold Fields Limited trades at 8.7× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 8.7× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +1.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +38.9%/yr price move, ~+31.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+7.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Gold Fields Limited reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −21.5% at the trough to +238.4%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 58.4%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +68.3% | +26.8% | — | — |
| Profit | +182.9% | +72.6% | — | — |
| EPS | +185.5% | +71.6% | — | — |
| Stock price | +1.5% | +50.5% | +38.9% | +24.2% |
4-Factor Sector Score
51.1/100 — rank 26 of 28 in Gold · 38% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Gold Fields Limited scores 51.1 out of 100 against the 28 companies it is compared with in Gold, ranking 26. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.6 + 15.5 + 10.2 + 6.8 = 51.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Gold Fields Limited reported $5.3 B of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +71.1% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 20.1% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $8.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $13.9 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $8.8 B (+68.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 20.1% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed $5.3 B, +71.1% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +41.7% growth against the decade's 20.1% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +58.7% over the last 4 quarters against +31.4%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +238.4% vs +63.0%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Gold Fields Limited's operating margin is 53.5% in the Dec 25 quarter, +8.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +21.7 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 20.3% to 60.6%.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 53.5%, +8.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 20.3%–60.6%, and FY25's 60.6% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +21.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +22.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Gold Fields Limited earned $2.6 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +191.0% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $3.6 B. The 4-year compound rate is 29.9%. That is 49.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.3 B.
Dec 25 profit was $2.6 B, +191.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $3.6 B (+182.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 29.9%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +71.1% and the margin +8.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +137.5% vs revenue +41.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 115% of Gold Fields Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $3.8 B of operating cash against $3.6 B of profit. After $1.4 B of capital spending, $2.4 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $3.8 B against reported profit of $3.6 B, leaving free cash of $2.4 B after $1.4 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 115% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Gold Fields Limited does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $4.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 15.2% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $4.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Gold Fields Limited earns a ROE of 42% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 16% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +34.1 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 41.7% net margin on 0.57× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 42%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 41.7% net margin × 0.57× asset turns × 1.76× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 41.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 41.7% − 7.6% = a +34.1 pp spread. The 7.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend
Gold Fields Limited pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Gold Fields Limited does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Debt-to-equity is 0.29 at the latest reading — effectively unlevered; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.
We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 0.29 — the balance sheet is effectively unlevered, so the returns above are earned, not borrowed. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Gold Fields Limited, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.8 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Gold Fields Limited: the Z-score reads 6.22. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 6.22 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 6.22.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Aura Minerals Inc.AUGO | 68.8/100Favorable setup74% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.6/35 Revenue 83.2% · PAT — · OPM change 12.5 pp 62% evidence | 17.9/25 ROCE 20.8% · OPM 53.7% 76% evidence | 7.9/20 P/E 75.6× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 29.1% · RS bench 26.7% · 1Y 169%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 17.9 + 7.9 + 19.4 = 68.8 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Fortuna Mining Corp.FSM | 67.9/100Favorable setup71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.4/35 Revenue 50.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 52.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 8.8% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 40.8%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.4 + 13.2 + 11 + 18.3 = 67.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.WPM | 66.8/100Favorable setup85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.9/35 Revenue 90.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 6.3 pp 95% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 71.8% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 24.9× · PEG 1.36 65% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 8.9% · 1Y 36.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.9 + 14 + 9.5 + 18.4 = 66.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4IAMGOLD CorporationIAG | 66.7/100Favorable setup81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.7/35 Revenue 92.3% · PAT 47.3% · OPM change 29.2 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 52.9% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 7.7% · RS bench 6.8% · 1Y 71.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.7 + 13 + 14.7 + 14.3 = 66.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5B2Gold Corp.BTG | 63.4/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.1/35 Revenue 86.9% · PAT — · OPM change 9.8 pp 62% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG 0.97 65% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 1.1% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y 14.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 14 + 12 + 14.3 = 63.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Agnico Eagle Mines LimitedAEM | 59.8/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.4/35 Revenue 50.3% · PAT 98.4% · OPM change 6.6 pp 95% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 60.1% 76% evidence | 14.4/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG 0.42 65% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector -0.1% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y 21.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.4 + 13.8 + 14.4 + 12.2 = 59.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Royal Gold, Inc.RGLD | 59.0/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.8/35 Revenue 70.7% · PAT 60.4% · OPM change — 45% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 12.6/20 RS sector 0.4% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 28.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 14.3 + 12.3 + 12.6 = 59 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8AngloGold Ashanti plcAU | 58.5/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.3/35 Revenue 54.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 50.8% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.7/20 RS sector 2.5% · RS bench 1.9% · 1Y 47.1%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.3 + 14.8 + 10.7 + 11.7 = 58.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9OceanaGold CorporationOGC | 58.2/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 19.9/35 Revenue 62.5% · PAT 35.8% · OPM change -8.1 pp 83% evidence | 21.9/25 ROCE 42.7% · OPM 152.9% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -7.7% · RS bench -8.6% · 1Y 41.6%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 21.9 + 11.2 + 5.2 = 58.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Franco-Nevada CorporationFNV | 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 16.4/35 Revenue 73.7% · PAT 88.4% · OPM change -6.1 pp 95% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 76.7% 76% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 27.2× · PEG 0.9 65% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 5.9% · RS bench 6.1% · 1Y 21.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 12.3 + 11.8 + 16.7 = 57.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 6.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 11SSR Mining Inc.SSRM | 55.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 25.0/35 Revenue 75.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17.9 pp 83% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 51.6% 76% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 28× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 19.7% · RS bench 20.2% · 1Y 54.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25 + 8.4 + 6.3 + 15.4 = 55.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Centerra Gold Inc.CGAU | 54.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.1 pp 45% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 22.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 4.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 24.5% · RS bench 23.9% · 1Y 129.8%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 7.3 + 11.4 + 18.5 = 54.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Aris Mining CorporationARIS | 54.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 54.8% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y 91.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.6 + 11.9 + 10.8 + 11.8 = 54.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Eldorado Gold CorporationEGO | 53.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.2 pp 45% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 51.4% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 9.6% · RS bench 9% · 1Y 45.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 8.1 + 10.3 + 18.3 = 53.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Newmont CorporationNEM | 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 10.5/35 Revenue 25.2% · PAT 33.9% · OPM change -7.1 pp 95% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 50.6% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG 0.28 65% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench 8.1% · 1Y 49%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.5 + 11 + 15.1 + 16.5 = 53.1 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 16Orla Mining Ltd.ORLA | 52.6/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | 23.1/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 19.7/25 ROCE 34.3% · OPM 136.8% 76% evidence | 4.5/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 2.92 65% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -33.1% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 5 weeks ahead to 2026-07-31 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 19.7 + 4.5 + 5.3 = 52.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is -0.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 17OR Royalties Inc.OR | 51.5/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | TURNING | 24.1/35 Revenue 61.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 15.3 pp 83% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 85.4% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -9.4% · RS bench -9.3% · 1Y -4.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.1 + 12.2 + 8.8 + 6.4 = 51.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -9.4% and the one-year return is -4.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 18Barrick Mining CorporationB | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | FADING | 22.8/35 Revenue 49.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 11.6 pp 95% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 50.1% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.4/20 RS sector -3.3% · RS bench -3.3% · 1Y 29%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 10.6 + 10.9 + 6.4 = 50.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -3.3% and the one-year return is 29%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 19Kinross Gold CorporationKGC | 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | FADING | 19.8/35 Revenue 39.4% · PAT 98.7% · OPM change 8.2 pp 95% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 53% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.2/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench -9.1% · 1Y 18.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.8 + 14.1 + 11.3 + 5.2 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Coeur Mining, Inc.CDE | 46.6/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.5 pp 83% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 40.8% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench -5.8% · 1Y 9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.6 + 6.1 + 9.8 + 7.1 = 46.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Alamos Gold Inc.AGI | 46.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 29.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 57.8% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.6/20 RS sector -14.8% · RS bench -15.4% · 1Y 6.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 12.9 + 10.5 + 2.6 = 46.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Pan American Silver Corp.PAAS | 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.6/35 Revenue 33.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.5 pp 83% evidence | 10.1/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 48.1% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.6/20 RS sector -10.1% · RS bench -10.7% · 1Y 30.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 10.1 + 9.5 + 2.6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23Equinox Gold Corp.EQX | 43.2/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | TURNING | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT 98.7% · OPM change 48.8 pp 32% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 45.3% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -16.4% · 1Y 7.2%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 7.8 + 9.4 + 5 = 43.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Hycroft Mining Holding CorporationHYMC | 28.7/100Adverse evidence60% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.9 pp 52% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -10.1% · OPM -177.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.3/20 RS sector -23.1% · RS bench -26.5% · 1Y 210.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 3 + 11.5 + 0.3 = 28.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Allied Gold CorporationAAUC | 28.3/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.3/35 Revenue 53% · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 62% evidence | 7.4/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.9/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench -21% · 1Y 32.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.3 + 7.4 + 9.7 + 0.9 = 28.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Gold Fields Limitedthis pageGFI | 51.1/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y 1.5%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 15.5 + 10.2 + 6.8 = 51.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Seabridge Gold Inc.SA | 32.2/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 187.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -5.8% · RS bench -5.9% · 1Y 45.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 4 = 32.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28NovaGold Resources Inc.NG | 29.8/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 0.7/20 RS sector -25.2% · RS bench -25.4% · 1Y -7.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 0.7 = 29.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Gold Fields Limited's stock price today?
Gold Fields Limited trades at $42.0, +1.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $38.0 B. The stock sits at 37% of its 52-week range of $32–$59, −4.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 1 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.
What were Gold Fields Limited's latest quarterly results?
Gold Fields Limited reported revenue of $5.3 B and net profit of $2.6 B for the Dec 25 quarter. Revenue rose 71.1% and profit rose 191.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.80. The operating margin was 53.5%, 8.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Gold Fields Limited's revenue?
Gold Fields Limited reported revenue of $5.3 B in the Dec 25 quarter, +71.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $8.8 B (+68.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 20.1% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Gold Fields Limited's profit?
Gold Fields Limited earned $2.6 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +191.0% year on year — the 3rd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $3.6 B. The operating margin ran 53.5% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Gold Fields Limited's market cap?
Gold Fields Limited's market capitalisation is $38.0 B at a stock price of $42.0. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Gold Fields Limited pay a dividend?
No — Gold Fields Limited has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Gold Fields Limited growing?
Yes — Gold Fields Limited is growing: latest-quarter revenue +71.1% year on year, profit +191.0%, and the margin +8.0 pp at 53.5%. The 4-year compound rates are 20.1% (revenue) and 29.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 17 September 2026.
How is Gold Fields Limited performing?
Gold Fields Limited is building a base, 1 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 71.1% and profit rose 191.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 5 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.
What stage is Gold Fields Limited in?
Turning around — profit growth swung from −21.5% at the trough to +238.4%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 58.4%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +58.7% latest, profit growth +238.4% latest, eps growth +243.2% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Gold Fields Limited in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 1 of stage 1), trading −4.3% versus its 200-day average and at 37% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Gold Fields Limited beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Gold Fields Limited has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 5 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +641% against the S&P 500's +255% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.
Will Gold Fields Limited's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Gold Fields Limited. What it measures instead: the stock price is $42.0, the price is building a base 1 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 17 September 2026.
Does Gold Fields Limited have too much debt?
No — Gold Fields Limited's debt-to-equity is 0.29. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Gold Fields Limited's capex?
Gold Fields Limited spent $4.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $1.4 B. — as of 17 September 2026.
What is Gold Fields Limited's cash flow?
Gold Fields Limited generated $3.8 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $2.4 B of free cash flow after $1.4 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $3.6 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Gold Fields Limited's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 115% of Gold Fields Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $3.8 B against reported profit of $3.6 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.
How financially safe is Gold Fields Limited?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 6.22 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 17 September 2026.
Where is Gold Fields Limited in its business cycle?
Gold Fields Limited's FY25 operating margin was 60.6%, against a 5-year band of 20.3%–60.6%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 53.5%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.
What could break the Gold Fields Limited story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +1.5% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.
Is Gold Fields Limited a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Gold Fields Limited's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +185.5% in a year against a +1.5% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!