Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Gold Fields Limited

GFI
Materials · Gold

Gold Fields Limited's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +185.5% in a year against a +33.3% price move.

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +33.3% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.

The price is building a base (13 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +191.0% year on year, and 115% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.

Stage
Turning around
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$34.1
+33.3% 1Y
P/E
8.6×
of its own 9-year range
Revenue (Dec 25)
$5.3 B
+71.1% YoY
Profit (Dec 25)
$2.6 B
+191.0% YoY
Operating margin
53.5%
+8.0 pp YoY
ROE
52%
FY25
ROIC
29.6%
vs WACC 6.6% → +23.0 pp
Cash conversion
115%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Gold Fields Limited trades at $34.1, building a base and 13 weeks into that stage. That is −21.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 14% of a 52-week range of $30 to $59. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (17 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is building a base — week 13 of stage 1. At $34.1 it trades −21.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 14% of its 52-week range ($30–$59).

Aug 26: $34.1 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−21.2% versus the 200-day line, week 13 of stage 1
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S1S2S1$62.7$48.8$34.9$20.9$7.0$$34$43Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S2S1S2S1$62.7$48.8$34.9$20.9$7.0$$34$43Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (527 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +503% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Gold Fields Limited trades at 8.6× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 8.6× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 8.6× vs a null× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 8.6-year window; loss-period spikes above 33× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
35.3×$5.726.8×$4.318.3×$2.99.8×$1.41.3×$0.0×$6.41×$5Jan 18Jul 21Mar 23Dec 24Aug 26
35.3×$5.726.8×$4.318.3×$2.99.8×$1.41.3×$0.0×$6.41×$5Jan 18Mar 23Aug 26
PEG 0.05 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Computed here as quarter-end P/E ÷ trailing-twelve-month EPS growth (only quarters with positive growth), because a reported quarterly PEG is not held for this stock. Last 6 quarters.
below 1.0, the growth looks cheap against the multiple
PEGPEG = 1.0
1.1×0.8×0.5×0.3×0.0××0.05×Jun 22Dec 22Jun 23Dec 24Dec 25
1.1×0.8×0.5×0.3×0.0××0.05×Jun 22Jun 23Dec 25
P/E
8.6×
too little history to rank
PEG
0.38
derived from 3-year earnings growth

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +33.3% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +31.1%/yr price move, ~+31.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−0.5 pp from the multiple (roughly flat). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Turning around

Stage: Turning around Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Gold Fields Limited reads as turning around on its fundamental arc. Turning around — profit growth swung from −21.5% at the trough to +238.4%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 58.4%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +68.3% in FY25, profit +182.9% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
74%204%54%137%35%71%16%3.8%−3.2%−63%%%68.3%182.9%FY21FY23FY25
74%204%54%137%35%71%16%3.8%−3.2%−63%%%68.3%182.9%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
63%327%47%229%30%130%13%31%−3.4%−68%%%58.7%238.4%243.2%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
63%327%47%229%30%130%13%31%−3.4%−68%%%58.7%238.4%243.2%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
62%50%37%25%13%%58.4%Jun 20Jun 21Dec 22Jun 24Dec 25
62%50%37%25%13%%58.4%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
Revenue growth
Rising
latest +58.7% · span +1.2% to +58.7%
Profit growth
Rising
latest +238.4% · span −40.4% to +519.4%
EPS growth
Rising
latest +243.2% · span −31.4% to +430.8%
ROCE
Rising
latest 58.4% · span 16.5%–58.4%

Why it matters: growth inflections are where re-ratings start — the curves say a turn is forming, so the question becomes whether the next quarters confirm it.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+68.3%+26.8%
Profit+182.9%+72.6%
EPS+185.5%+71.6%
Stock price+33.3%+36.7%+31.1%+18.7%
Revenue YoY (Dec 25)
+71.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Dec 25)
+191.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
20.1%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

49.2/100 — rank 26 of 28 in Gold · 38% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Gold Fields Limited scores 49.2 out of 100 against the 28 companies it is compared with in Gold, ranking 26. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.4 + 15.5 + 10.3 + 5 = 49.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Gold Fields Limited reported $5.3 B of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, +71.1% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 20.1% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $8.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $13.9 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $8.8 B (+68.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 20.1% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed $5.3 B, +71.1% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $8.8 B (+68.3% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
20.1% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
9.474%7.154%4.735%2.416%0.0−3.2%$ B%$9B68.3%FY21FY23FY25
9.474%7.154%4.735%2.416%0.0−3.2%$ B%$9B68.3%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $5.3 B (+71.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
5.777%4.355%2.832%1.49.2%0.0−13%$ B%$5B71.1%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
5.777%4.355%2.832%1.49.2%0.0−13%$ B%$5B71.1%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +41.7% growth against the decade's 20.1% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +58.7% over the last 4 quarters against +31.4%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit +238.4% vs +63.0%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Gold Fields Limited's operating margin is 53.5% in the Dec 25 quarter, +8.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +21.7 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 20.3% to 60.6%.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 53.5%, +8.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 20.3%–60.6%, and FY25's 60.6% is the top of that band — a record year.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +21.7 pp year on year while gross margin went +22.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

FY25: 60.6% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
the widest a 20.3–60.6% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
64%25%52%14%40%3.7%29%−7.0%17%−18%%%60.6%22.1%FY21FY23FY25
64%25%52%14%40%3.7%29%−7.0%17%−18%%%60.6%22.1%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: 53.5% operating margin (+8.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
57%17%45%10%33%3.0%22%−4.0%9.9%−11%%%53.5%8%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
57%17%45%10%33%3.0%22%−4.0%9.9%−11%%%53.5%8%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Gold Fields Limited earned $2.6 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +191.0% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $3.6 B. The 4-year compound rate is 29.9%. That is 49.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.3 B.

Dec 25 profit was $2.6 B, +191.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $3.6 B (+182.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 29.9%.

FY25 profit $3.6 B (+182.9% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
29.9% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
3.9201%3.0135%2.069%1.03.3%0.0−63%$ B%$4B182.9%FY21FY23FY25
3.9201%3.0135%2.069%1.03.3%0.0−63%$ B%$4B182.9%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $2.6 B (+191.0% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
2.8524%2.1364%1.4203%0.742%0.0−119%$ B%$3B191%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
2.8524%2.1364%1.4203%0.742%0.0−119%$ B%$3B191%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +71.1% and the margin +8.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +137.5% vs revenue +41.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 115% of Gold Fields Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $3.8 B of operating cash against $3.6 B of profit. After $1.4 B of capital spending, $2.4 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $3.8 B against reported profit of $3.6 B, leaving free cash of $2.4 B after $1.4 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 115% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $3.8 B vs profit $3.6 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
115% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
4.13.12.01.00.0$ B$4B$4B$2BFY21FY23FY25
4.13.12.01.00.0$ B$4B$4B$2BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: operating cash $2.5 B = 95% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
2.7374%1.9266%1.2159%0.452%−0.4−56%$ B%$3B95%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
2.7374%1.9266%1.2159%0.452%−0.4−56%$ B%$3B95%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Gold Fields Limited does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $4.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 15.2% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $4.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $1.4 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
1.51.10.80.40.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
1.51.10.80.40.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Jun 25: capex $0.7 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 10 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)
0.70.50.40.20.0$ B$1BJun 16Jun 20Jun 25
0.70.50.40.20.0$ B$1BJun 16Jun 20Jun 25

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Gold Fields Limited earns a ROE of 42% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 16% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +23.0 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 41.7% net margin on 0.57× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 42%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 41.7% net margin × 0.57× asset turns × 1.76× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 41.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 29.6% − 6.6% = a +23.0 pp spread. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.

FY25: ROE 42% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 6.6% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's 16%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
45%35%24%14%3.8%%42.1%41.5%FY21FY23FY25
45%35%24%14%3.8%%42.1%41.5%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: ROIC 28.6% (TTM) vs WACC 6.6% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
60%46%31%17%2.6%%28.6%56%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
60%46%31%17%2.6%%28.6%56%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Gold Fields Limited pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Gold Fields Limited does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Debt-to-equity is 0.37 at the latest reading — modestly levered; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.

We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 0.37 — a modest level of leverage behind the returns above. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.

13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Gold Fields Limited, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Gold Fields Limited: the Z-score reads 4.57. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 4.57 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 4.57.

15 · Related companies · Gold
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Franco-Nevada CorporationFNV 65.4/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 25.2/35 Revenue 71.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 20 pp 83% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 88.8% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 34.8× · PEG 1.31 65% evidence 16.0/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -11% · 1Y 27.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.2 + 14 + 10.2 + 16 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.WPM 62.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BASING 25.3/35 Revenue 88.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13.1 pp 83% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 74.9% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 33.1× · PEG 1.36 65% evidence 12.9/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 14.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.3 + 14.9 + 9.6 + 12.9 = 62.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Barrick Mining CorporationB 62.2/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 24.6/35 Revenue 43.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 26.8 pp 83% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 62.6% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 11.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.4/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y 63.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.6 + 13 + 10.2 + 14.4 = 62.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Fortuna Mining Corp.FSM 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 24.5/35 Revenue 50.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.9 pp 83% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 52.6% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.7% · 1Y 37.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 13 + 11 + 13.1 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5IAMGOLD CorporationIAG 60.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 24.4/35 Revenue 92.3% · PAT 47.3% · OPM change 29.2 pp 83% evidence 12.7/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 52.9% 76% evidence 15.7/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence 7.4/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y 97.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.4 + 12.7 + 15.7 + 7.4 = 60.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Aura Minerals Inc.AUGO 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence ASLEEP 22.1/35 Revenue 83.2% · PAT — · OPM change 12.5 pp 62% evidence 17.5/25 ROCE 20.8% · OPM 53.7% 76% evidence 8.2/20 P/E 75.6× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence 11.9/20 RS sector 10.6% · RS bench -8.9% · 1Y 120.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 17.5 + 8.2 + 11.9 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
7OceanaGold CorporationOGC 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue 62.5% · PAT 35.8% · OPM change -8.1 pp 83% evidence 21.9/25 ROCE 42.7% · OPM 152.9% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y 52.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 21.9 + 11.2 + 7 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Royal Gold, Inc.RGLD 57.7/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 19.3/35 Revenue 70.7% · PAT 60.4% · OPM change — 45% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence 10.8/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y 21.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 14.3 + 13.3 + 10.8 = 57.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Centerra Gold Inc.CGAU 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.1 pp 45% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 22.4% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 4.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.7/20 RS sector 30.9% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 158.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.7 + 7.3 + 11.4 + 19.7 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10B2Gold Corp.BTG 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence BASING 21.8/35 Revenue 86.9% · PAT — · OPM change 9.8 pp 62% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG 0.97 65% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 8.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.8 + 14 + 13 + 6.1 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11AngloGold Ashanti plcAU 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.9 pp 45% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 55.9% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -14.7% · 1Y 41.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 8.7 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Newmont CorporationNEM 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.2 pp 45% evidence 11.5/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 61.1% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.7/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 41.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 11.5 + 10.1 + 14.7 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Aris Mining CorporationARIS 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.5 pp 45% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 54.8% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.1/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 97.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 11.2 + 10.9 + 11.1 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14SSR Mining Inc.SSRM 50.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 23.1/35 Revenue 75.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17.9 pp 83% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 51.6% 76% evidence 6.7/20 P/E 28× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence 12.2/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 75%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.1 + 8.1 + 6.7 + 12.2 = 50.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
15OR Royalties Inc.OR 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BASING 21.7/35 Revenue 61.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 15.3 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 85.4% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -10.8% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 1.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 7.2 = 49.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Eldorado Gold CorporationEGO 49.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.2 pp 45% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 51.4% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.7/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y 40.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.8 + 7.8 + 10.5 + 14.7 = 49.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Kinross Gold CorporationKGC 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.5 pp 45% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y 24.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 5.3 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18Orla Mining Ltd.ORLA 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence 22.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence 19.7/25 ROCE 34.3% · OPM 136.8% 76% evidence 4.5/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 2.92 65% evidence 2.3/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -33.1% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 11 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 19.7 + 4.5 + 2.3 = 49.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is -0.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
19Pan American Silver Corp.PAAS 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 21.0/35 Revenue 33.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.5 pp 83% evidence 9.5/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 48.1% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector 0.5% · RS bench -15.6% · 1Y 40.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21 + 9.5 + 9.5 + 8.3 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
20Coeur Mining, Inc.CDE 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 22.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.5 pp 83% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 40.8% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.2/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y 39.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.9 + 6.1 + 9.8 + 8.2 = 47 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21Agnico Eagle Mines LimitedAEM 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.7 pp 45% evidence 11.7/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 62.8% 76% evidence 9.9/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.1/20 RS sector -9.8% · RS bench -23.6% · 1Y 11.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 11.7 + 9.9 + 7.1 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Alamos Gold Inc.AGI 45.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 29.4 pp 45% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 57.8% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.9/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -30.8% · 1Y 9.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 12.5 + 10.6 + 1.9 = 45.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Equinox Gold Corp.EQX 39.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT 98.7% · OPM change 48.8 pp 32% evidence 7.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 45.3% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y 48.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21 + 7.8 + 9.4 + 1.3 = 39.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
24Hycroft Mining Holding CorporationHYMC 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence ASLEEP 13.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.9 pp 52% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -10.1% · OPM -177.5% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.7/20 RS sector 10.2% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y 546.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.1 + 3 + 11.5 + 10.7 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Allied Gold CorporationAAUC 28.2/100Adverse evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 9.8/35 Revenue 53% · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 62% evidence 7.1/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.6/20 RS sector -14% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y 60.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.8 + 7.1 + 9.7 + 1.6 = 28.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26Gold Fields Limitedthis pageGFI 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence BASING 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 15.5/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -27.1% · 1Y 9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.5 + 10.3 + 5 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Seabridge Gold Inc.SA 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 187.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.5/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y 66.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 15.5 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28NovaGold Resources Inc.NG 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence BASING 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 5.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 1.4/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -33.7% · 1Y 11.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 1.4 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Gold Fields Limited's stock price today?

Gold Fields Limited trades at $34.1, +33.3% over the past year. The company is valued at $31.0 B. The stock sits at 14% of its 52-week range of $30–$59, −21.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 13 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Gold Fields Limited's latest quarterly results?

Gold Fields Limited reported revenue of $5.3 B and net profit of $2.6 B for the Dec 25 quarter. Revenue rose 71.1% and profit rose 191.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.80. The operating margin was 53.5%, 8.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Gold Fields Limited's revenue?

Gold Fields Limited reported revenue of $5.3 B in the Dec 25 quarter, +71.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $8.8 B (+68.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 20.1% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Gold Fields Limited's profit?

Gold Fields Limited earned $2.6 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +191.0% year on year — the 3rd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $3.6 B. The operating margin ran 53.5% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Gold Fields Limited's market cap?

Gold Fields Limited's market capitalisation is $31.0 B at a stock price of $34.1. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Gold Fields Limited pay a dividend?

No — Gold Fields Limited has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Gold Fields Limited growing?

Yes — Gold Fields Limited is growing: latest-quarter revenue +71.1% year on year, profit +191.0%, and the margin +8.0 pp at 53.5%. The 4-year compound rates are 20.1% (revenue) and 29.9% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Gold Fields Limited performing?

Gold Fields Limited is building a base, 13 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 71.1% and profit rose 191.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 17 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Gold Fields Limited in?

Turning around — profit growth swung from −21.5% at the trough to +238.4%, a 3-quarter improving streak, ROCE lifting at 58.4%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +58.7% latest, profit growth +238.4% latest, eps growth +243.2% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Gold Fields Limited in an uptrend?

No — the price is building a base (week 13 of stage 1), trading −21.2% versus its 200-day average and at 14% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Gold Fields Limited beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Gold Fields Limited is currently behind the S&P 500 (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +503% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Gold Fields Limited's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Gold Fields Limited. What it measures instead: the stock price is $34.1, the price is building a base 13 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Gold Fields Limited have too much debt?

It is moderate — Gold Fields Limited's debt-to-equity is 0.37. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Gold Fields Limited's capex?

Gold Fields Limited spent $4.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $1.4 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Gold Fields Limited's cash flow?

Gold Fields Limited generated $3.8 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $2.4 B of free cash flow after $1.4 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $3.6 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Gold Fields Limited's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 115% of Gold Fields Limited's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $3.8 B against reported profit of $3.6 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Gold Fields Limited?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 4.57 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Gold Fields Limited in its business cycle?

Gold Fields Limited's FY25 operating margin was 60.6%, against a 5-year band of 20.3%–60.6%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 53.5%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Gold Fields Limited story?

The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +185.5% against a +33.3% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Gold Fields Limited a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Gold Fields Limited's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +185.5% in a year against a +33.3% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI