Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is building a base (7 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation trades at $22.4, building a base and 7 weeks into that stage. That is −19.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 40% of a 52-week range of $4 to $51. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (13 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is building a base — week 7 of stage 1. At $22.4 it trades −19.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 40% of its 52-week range ($4–$51).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 8.4 years the stock moved −77% while the S&P 500 moved +181% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-08) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation at 66.7× its FY22 revenue of $0.0 B.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −72.7% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | +544.4% | +73.2% | +3.3% | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
38.3/100 — rank 24 of 28 in Gold · 60% evidence confidence
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation scores 38.3 out of 100 against the 28 companies it is compared with in Gold, ranking 24. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 13.1 + 3 + 11.5 + 10.7 = 38.3. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation reported $0.0 B of revenue in the Dec 22 quarter, −50.0% year on year. Over 1 years it has compounded at −72.7% a year. The last full year, FY22, came in at $0.0 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.0 B.
FY22 revenue came in at $0.0 B (−72.7% on the year), capping 1 years at −72.7% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 22) printed $0.0 B, −50.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −72.2% growth against the decade's −72.7% — the current year is running in line with its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's operating margin is −200.0% in the Dec 22 quarter, +50.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago.
The latest quarter's operating margin is −200.0%, +50.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 2 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −166.7%–−72.7%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −133.3 pp year on year while gross margin went −66.7 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation posted a net loss of $0.01 B in the Dec 22 quarter. The full FY22 year was a loss of $0.1 B. That loss is 100.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.1 B.
Dec 22 profit was $−0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY22 printed $−0.1 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY22 that was $−0.0 B of operating cash against $−0.1 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $−0.0 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY22: operating cash of $−0.0 B against reported profit of $−0.1 B, leaving free cash of $−0.0 B after $0.0 B of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 2 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY22 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 2 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation earns a ROE of −100% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −325.6 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −200.0% net margin on 0.12× asset turns.
FY22 ROE is −100%.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY22): −200.0% net margin × 0.12× asset turns × 4.17× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −100.1% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −305.6% − 20.0% = a −325.6 pp spread. The 20.0% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation pays no dividend. Across the last 7 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 7 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation carries total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.00 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from −2.29 in FY21 to 0.00 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Jun 26: total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.3 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.00. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from −2.29 (FY21) to 0.00 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
22.6% of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 5.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 22.6% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 5.3 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Franco-Nevada CorporationFNV | 65.4/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 25.2/35 Revenue 71.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 20 pp 83% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 88.8% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 34.8× · PEG 1.31 65% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 4.2% · RS bench -11% · 1Y 27.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.2 + 14 + 10.2 + 16 = 65.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.WPM | 62.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 25.3/35 Revenue 88.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13.1 pp 83% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 7.9% · OPM 74.9% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 33.1× · PEG 1.36 65% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.8% · 1Y 14.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.3 + 14.9 + 9.6 + 12.9 = 62.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Barrick Mining CorporationB | 62.2/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.6/35 Revenue 43.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 26.8 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 6.9% · OPM 62.6% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 11.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 3.7% · RS bench -12.3% · 1Y 63.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 13 + 10.2 + 14.4 = 62.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Fortuna Mining Corp.FSM | 61.6/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.5/35 Revenue 50.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 8.8% · OPM 52.6% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 9.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -13.7% · 1Y 37.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.5 + 13 + 11 + 13.1 = 61.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5IAMGOLD CorporationIAG | 60.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.4/35 Revenue 92.3% · PAT 47.3% · OPM change 29.2 pp 83% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 52.9% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 10.9× · PEG 0.46 65% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench -15.9% · 1Y 97.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 12.7 + 15.7 + 7.4 = 60.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Aura Minerals Inc.AUGO | 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue 83.2% · PAT — · OPM change 12.5 pp 62% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 20.8% · OPM 53.7% 76% evidence | 8.2/20 P/E 75.6× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector 10.6% · RS bench -8.9% · 1Y 120.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 17.5 + 8.2 + 11.9 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7OceanaGold CorporationOGC | 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue 62.5% · PAT 35.8% · OPM change -8.1 pp 83% evidence | 21.9/25 ROCE 42.7% · OPM 152.9% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y 52.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 21.9 + 11.2 + 7 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Royal Gold, Inc.RGLD | 57.7/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.3/35 Revenue 70.7% · PAT 60.4% · OPM change — 45% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 30.3× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector -1.2% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y 21.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.3 + 14.3 + 13.3 + 10.8 = 57.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Centerra Gold Inc.CGAU | 55.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 8.1 pp 45% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 22.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 4.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 30.9% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 158.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 7.3 + 11.4 + 19.7 = 55.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10B2Gold Corp.BTG | 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence | BASING | 21.8/35 Revenue 86.9% · PAT — · OPM change 9.8 pp 62% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 12.4% · OPM 49% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 12.6× · PEG 0.97 65% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 8.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 14 + 13 + 6.1 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11AngloGold Ashanti plcAU | 53.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.9 pp 45% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 55.9% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench -14.7% · 1Y 41.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 8.7 = 53.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Newmont CorporationNEM | 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 61.1% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 41.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 11.5 + 10.1 + 14.7 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Aris Mining CorporationARIS | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 7.7% · OPM 54.8% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -11.7% · 1Y 97.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 11.2 + 10.9 + 11.1 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14SSR Mining Inc.SSRM | 50.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue 75.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17.9 pp 83% evidence | 8.1/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 51.6% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 28× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector 9.8% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 75%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 8.1 + 6.7 + 12.2 = 50.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 15OR Royalties Inc.OR | 49.8/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | BASING | 21.7/35 Revenue 61.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 15.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 85.4% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 28.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -10.8% · RS bench -23.8% · 1Y 1.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.8 + 9.1 + 7.2 = 49.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Eldorado Gold CorporationEGO | 49.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.2 pp 45% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 51.4% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 3.4% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y 40.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 7.8 + 10.5 + 14.7 = 49.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Kinross Gold CorporationKGC | 49.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.5 pp 45% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 10.5% · OPM 55.6% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -9% · RS bench -23.1% · 1Y 24.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 13.9 + 11.3 + 5.3 = 49.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18Orla Mining Ltd.ORLA | 49.3/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | 22.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.8 pp 62% evidence | 19.7/25 ROCE 34.3% · OPM 136.8% 76% evidence | 4.5/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG 2.92 65% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -33.1% · 1Y -0.8%0 of 11 weeks ahead 100% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 19.7 + 4.5 + 2.3 = 49.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is -0.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 19Pan American Silver Corp.PAAS | 48.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue 33.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.5/25 ROCE 7% · OPM 48.1% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector 0.5% · RS bench -15.6% · 1Y 40.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 9.5 + 9.5 + 8.3 = 48.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Coeur Mining, Inc.CDE | 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.9/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 23.5 pp 83% evidence | 6.1/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 40.8% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.2/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench -19.6% · 1Y 39.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.9 + 6.1 + 9.8 + 8.2 = 47 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Agnico Eagle Mines LimitedAEM | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.7 pp 45% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 62.8% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 13.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -9.8% · RS bench -23.6% · 1Y 11.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 11.7 + 9.9 + 7.1 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Alamos Gold Inc.AGI | 45.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 29.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 57.8% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.9/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench -30.8% · 1Y 9.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 12.5 + 10.6 + 1.9 = 45.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Equinox Gold Corp.EQX | 39.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT 98.7% · OPM change 48.8 pp 32% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 45.3% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 18.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.3/20 RS sector -18.2% · RS bench -31.3% · 1Y 48.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 7.8 + 9.4 + 1.3 = 39.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Hycroft Mining Holding Corporationthis pageHYMC | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence60% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 16.9 pp 52% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -10.1% · OPM -177.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.7/20 RS sector 10.2% · RS bench -13.3% · 1Y 546.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 3 + 11.5 + 10.7 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Allied Gold CorporationAAUC | 28.2/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.8/35 Revenue 53% · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 62% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -14% · RS bench -28.6% · 1Y 60.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.8 + 7.1 + 9.7 + 1.6 = 28.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 26Gold Fields LimitedGFI | 49.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | BASING | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 15.5/25 ROCE 12.8% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 11.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -13.9% · RS bench -27.1% · 1Y 9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 15.5 + 10.3 + 5 = 49.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Seabridge Gold Inc.SA | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM — 61% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 187.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench -10.6% · 1Y 66.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 15.5 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28NovaGold Resources Inc.NG | 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BASING | 13.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 1.4/20 RS sector -21.5% · RS bench -33.7% · 1Y 11.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.9 + 5.2 + 10 + 1.4 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's stock price today?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation trades at $22.4, +544.4% over the past year. The company is valued at $2.0 B. The stock sits at 40% of its 52-week range of $4–$51, −19.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 7 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's latest quarterly results?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation reported revenue of $0.0 B and a net loss of $0.0 B for the Dec 22 quarter. Earnings per share were $−0.68. The operating margin was −200.0%, 50.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's revenue?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation reported revenue of $0.0 B in the Dec 22 quarter, −50.0% year on year. For the full FY22 fiscal year, revenue was $0.0 B (−72.7%). Over the last 1 years revenue compounded at −72.7% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's profit?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation earned $−0.0 B of net profit in the Dec 22 quarter. Full-year FY22 profit was $−0.1 B. The operating margin ran −200.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's market cap?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's market capitalisation is $2.0 B at a stock price of $22.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation pay a dividend?
No — Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 7 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation performing?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is building a base, 7 weeks in. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 13 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 7 of stage 1), trading −19.9% versus its 200-day average and at 40% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is currently behind the S&P 500 (13 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-08), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 8.4 years the stock moved −77% against the S&P 500's +181% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. What it measures instead: the stock price is $22.4, the price is building a base 7 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation?
Yes — short interest is 22.6% of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's tradable float, about 5.3 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's capex?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 2 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY22 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's cash flow?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation generated $−0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY22 and $−0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation in its business cycle?
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's FY22 operating margin was −166.7%, against a 2-year band of −166.7%–−72.7%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −200.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.