Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.5B
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Household & Personal Products Stocks
Household & Personal Products: The Procter & Gamble Company owns the largest revenue base; Magnera Corporation has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Household & Personal Products moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 42% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 1% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 13 weeks running.
FADING · −6 in 4w~Price down, no fundamental support10 of 22 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑13w · 11/22 >200d (−6) · 10/22 lead (−6) · EPS 10/22↑
Household & Personal Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Household & Personal Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Household & Personal Products, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 22 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Household & Personal Products outperforming S&P 500?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 14.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 9.8%. 8 of 20 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. The Honest Company, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +46.2%.
+9.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-14.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
8/20Stocks leading S&P 500
8/20Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 14.4% over 52 weeks and 9.8% over 13 weeks. 8 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself. The Procter & Gamble Company leads with revenue of $87,033 million, based on 18 of 20 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
20
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$699.6B
The Procter & Gamble Company
Revenue growing
12/18
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
8/20
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 20
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Helen of Troy Limited has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 70.7% evidence confidence.
Interparfums, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Helen of Troy LimitedHELE | 67.7/100Favorable setup71% evidence | FADING | 23.9/35 Revenue -2.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 124.5 pp 71% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 10.2× · PEG 0.42 65% evidence | 15.1/20 RS sector 13.5% · RS bench 14.9% · 1Y 20.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.9 + 12.4 + 16.3 + 15.1 = 67.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Interparfums, Inc.IPAR | 56.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.5/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT 1.5% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 21.5% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 17.2× · PEG 1.99 65% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench 7.1% · 1Y 11.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 15.3 + 10.1 + 16 = 56.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 7.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 3Newell Brands Inc.NWL | 56.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 45% evidence | 8.6/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 27.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 17.3% · RS bench 18% · 1Y 2.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 8.6 + 9.6 + 18.4 = 56.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Church & Dwight Co., Inc.CHD | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.9/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT 41.9% · OPM change -2.7 pp 95% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 14.6% · OPM 18.1% 76% evidence | 14.1/20 P/E 30.8× · PEG 0.66 65% evidence | 5.8/20 RS sector -5.8% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 5.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 17.6 + 14.1 + 5.8 = 55.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Kenvue Inc.KVUE | 52.5/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT 16.9% · OPM change -0.3 pp 95% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 17.7% 76% evidence | 12.4/20 P/E 22× · PEG 1.25 65% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -6.6% · RS bench -5.5% · 1Y -2.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 14.1 + 12.4 + 5.9 = 52.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.SPB | 51.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | FADING | 22.1/35 Revenue -3.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.2 pp 83% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 14× · PEG 2.17 65% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 11.1% · 1Y 64.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 8.2 + 9.8 + 11.6 = 51.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7The Procter & Gamble CompanyPG | 50.6/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.2/35 Revenue 3.3% · PAT 0.5% · OPM change -2.1 pp 95% evidence | 21.8/25 ROCE 24.6% · OPM 22.1% 76% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG 2.4 65% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench -7.3% · 1Y -5.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 21.8 + 6.9 + 4.7 = 50.6 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 8The Clorox CompanyCLX | 49.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue -3.7% · PAT 8.6% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 8.7% · OPM 17.3% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 16.8× · PEG 1.59 65% evidence | 1.6/20 RS sector -24.8% · RS bench -24.3% · 1Y -30.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 14.6 + 12 + 1.6 = 49.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Acme United CorporationACU | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.1/35 Revenue 4.1% · PAT 0% · OPM change -2 pp 83% evidence | 9.0/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 3.3% 76% evidence | 5.8/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG 2.81 65% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 27.3% · RS bench 28.7% · 1Y 42.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 9 + 5.8 + 16.5 = 45.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 28.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 10Magnera CorporationMAGN | 43.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue 35.3% · PAT — · OPM change 1.6 pp 62% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 2.1% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -9.9% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y 4.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 5.7 + 11.2 + 5.4 = 43.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Colgate-Palmolive CompanyCL | 42.7/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.1/35 Revenue 5.2% · PAT -29.2% · OPM change -2.1 pp 95% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 9.5% · OPM 19% 76% evidence | 7.8/20 P/E 36.4× · PEG 2.2 65% evidence | 4.2/20 RS sector -6.8% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 7.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 16.6 + 7.8 + 4.2 = 42.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Kimberly-Clark CorporationKMB | 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.4/35 Revenue 0.7% · PAT -20.9% · OPM change 0.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.6/25 ROCE 6% · OPM 15.1% 76% evidence | 7.7/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG 2.35 65% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -13.6% · RS bench -13% · 1Y -21.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 14.6 + 7.7 + 3.6 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.EL | 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.3/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT — · OPM change -1.9 pp 62% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 6.7% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 178× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -4.4% · RS bench -3.8% · 1Y 8.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.3 + 9.4 + 8.7 + 9.8 = 42.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Edgewell Personal Care CompanyEPC | 41.2/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | LEADER | 8.2/35 Revenue 0.4% · PAT -139.1% · OPM change -6 pp 83% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 3.5% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 38.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 14.3% · RS bench 15.3% · 1Y 31.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.2 + 8.3 + 9.1 + 15.6 = 41.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 15.3%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15The Honest Company, Inc.HNST | 39.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 8.8/35 Revenue -9.5% · PAT — · OPM change -3.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -0.8% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 61.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 46.2% · RS bench 47.7% · 1Y 36.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.8 + 4.7 + 9 + 17 = 39.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.NUS | 39.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 18.7/35 Revenue -14.2% · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 62% evidence | 6.2/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 1.3% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 6.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -46.1% · RS bench -46.1% · 1Y -62.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 6.2 + 11.5 + 3 = 39.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.ELF | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.3/35 Revenue 24.7% · PAT -76.8% · OPM change -24.5 pp 83% evidence | 6.9/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -11.2% 76% evidence | 3.8/20 P/E 137.8× · PEG 5.38 65% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y -33.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 6.9 + 3.8 + 16.6 = 38.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Coty Inc.COTY | 30.1/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 10.1/35 Revenue -3.6% · PAT — · OPM change -7.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.1/25 ROCE -4.4% · OPM -29% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 20311× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y -36%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.1 + 4.1 + 8.5 + 7.4 = 30.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Oddity Tech Ltd.ODD | 26.1/100Adverse evidence75% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 8.7/35 Revenue 5.1% · PAT -50.9% · OPM change -28.8 pp 83% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -3.9% · OPM -12.9% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 16.9× · PEG 2.29 65% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -34.4% · RS bench -35.5% · 1Y -71%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.7 + 5.4 + 8.5 + 3.5 = 26.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Unilever PLCUL | 49.3/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM — 61% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 12.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -9.5% · RS bench -8.9% · 1Y -9.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.6 + 11 + 6.1 = 49.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 20 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Household & Personal Products at +64.4%. The Honest Company, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +47.7%. 8 of 20 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Household & Personal Products itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest Revenue among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $87,033 million. Colgate-Palmolive Company is next at $21,046 million. Magnera Corporation has the highest Revenue growth at 35.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 18 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company is the scale leader at $87,033 million, 313.5% ahead of Colgate-Palmolive Company. Magnera Corporation's growth is 35.3% from a $3,266 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · $87,033 million
Gap313.5% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive Company
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/20 companies · 373 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company is the scale benchmark; Magnera Corporation is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: The Procter & Gamble Company's growth falls below Magnera Corporation's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
18/20 level · 18/20 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unilever PLC UL | $25.6B | 0.5% | Jun 2026 |
| The Procter & Gamble Company PG | $21.2B | 1.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | $5.4B | 4.9% | Jun 2026 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB | $4.2B | 0.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Kenvue Inc. KVUE | $4.0B | 3.0% | Jun 2026 |
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL | $3.7B | 4.6% | Mar 2026 |
| The Clorox Company CLX | $1.7B | 0.1% | Mar 2026 |
| Newell Brands Inc. NWL | $1.5B | -1.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD | $1.5B | 1.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Coty Inc. COTY | $1.3B | -1.3% | Mar 2026 |
| Magnera Corporation MAGN | $796M | -3.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB | $709M | 4.9% | Mar 2026 |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC | $520M | 0.6% | Mar 2026 |
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF | $449M | 35% | Mar 2026 |
| Helen of Troy Limited HELE | $402M | 8.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Interparfums, Inc. IPAR | $345M | 1.8% | Mar 2026 |
| Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS | $321M | -12% | Mar 2026 |
| Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD | $198M | -26% | Mar 2026 |
| The Honest Company, Inc. HNST | $78M | -20% | Mar 2026 |
| Acme United Corporation ACU | $52M | 13% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
$4.4B
$4.4B
$4.4B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$4.6B
$4.8B
$4.8B
$4.9B
$5.0B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.0B
$4.9B
$4.9B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.2B
$5.3B
$5.4B
Coty Inc. · COTY
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.3B
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
$92M
$98M
$105M
$123M
$122M
$147M
$187M
$216M
$216M
$271M
$321M
$324M
$301M
$355M
$333M
$354M
$344M
$490M
$449M
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
$263M
$211M
$251M
$245M
$280M
$311M
$312M
$309M
$368M
$329M
$324M
$342M
$425M
$362M
$339M
$334M
$430M
$386M
$345M
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$3.9B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$4.0B
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
$5.0B
$5.0B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.0B
$5.2B
$5.1B
$5.1B
$5.0B
$5.1B
$4.2B
$4.1B
$4.1B
$4.1B
$4.2B
$4.2B
$4.1B
$4.2B
$4.2B
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$1.8B
$2.2B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$1.6B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.5B
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$1.4B
$2.0B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.4B
$1.7B
$1.7B
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
$4.4B
$5.5B
$4.2B
$3.6B
$3.9B
$4.6B
$3.8B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$4.3B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$3.4B
$4.0B
$3.6B
$3.4B
$3.5B
$4.2B
$3.7B
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
$20.3B
$21.0B
$19.4B
$19.5B
$20.6B
$20.8B
$20.1B
$20.6B
$21.9B
$21.4B
$20.2B
$20.5B
$21.7B
$21.9B
$19.8B
$20.9B
$22.4B
$22.2B
$21.2B
$21.2B
Unilever PLC · UL
—
$26.7B
—
$29.6B
—
$30.5B
—
$30.4B
—
$21.3B
—
$26.5B
—
$26.0B
—
$25.5B
—
$25.0B
—
$25.6B
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
—
—
—
4.3%
0.5%
4.9%
10%
9.7%
11%
6.4%
5.1%
3.9%
3.8%
3.5%
-2.4%
-0.3%
5.0%
3.9%
0.1%
1.6%
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
—
—
—
5.3%
0.9%
5.1%
8.4%
7.5%
10%
6.9%
6.2%
4.9%
2.4%
-0.1%
-3.0%
1.0%
2.0%
5.8%
8.4%
4.9%
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
—
—
10.0%
1.3%
-3.4%
8.7%
16%
18%
13%
7.5%
0.8%
1.9%
-3.4%
-6.3%
-8.1%
-5.7%
0.5%
-1.3%
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
—
—
—
27%
33%
50%
78%
76%
77%
84%
72%
50%
39%
31%
3.7%
9.3%
14%
38%
35%
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
—
—
—
18%
6.5%
47%
24%
26%
31%
5.8%
3.9%
11%
15%
10%
4.6%
-2.3%
1.2%
6.6%
1.8%
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9%
7.3%
5.4%
3.3%
3.4%
3.8%
-2.8%
-6.5%
-3.9%
-4.0%
-3.5%
3.2%
4.5%
3.0%
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
—
—
—
7.2%
0.9%
-0.0%
2.0%
1.4%
1.6%
0.1%
-0.9%
-18%
-19%
-17%
-21%
-1.6%
0.1%
-0.6%
2.7%
0.6%
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
—
—
—
-6.5%
-19%
-19%
-24%
-13%
-9.1%
-9.2%
-8.4%
-7.8%
-4.9%
-6.1%
-5.3%
-4.8%
-7.2%
-2.7%
-1.1%
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
—
—
—
-0.1%
-3.7%
1.4%
5.9%
12%
-20%
16%
-5.3%
-5.8%
27%
-15%
-8.1%
4.5%
-19%
-0.8%
0.1%
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
—
—
—
-9.5%
-11%
-17%
-12%
1.4%
-10%
-7.4%
5.0%
7.3%
-4.5%
-6.4%
-9.9%
-12%
3.6%
5.6%
4.6%
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
—
—
—
3.0%
1.4%
-0.9%
3.5%
5.3%
6.1%
3.2%
0.6%
-0.1%
-0.6%
2.1%
-2.1%
1.7%
3.0%
1.5%
7.4%
1.5%
Unilever PLC · UL
—
6.6%
—
15%
—
14%
—
2.7%
—
-30%
—
-13%
—
22%
—
-3.8%
—
-3.8%
—
0.5%
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest OPM among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 22.1%. Interparfums, Inc. is next at 21.5%. Helen of Troy Limited has the highest Margin change at +124.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company leads opm at 22.1%; Helen of Troy Limited leads margin change at +124.5 percentage points.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · 22.1%
Gap2.8% versus #2 · Interparfums, Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/20 companies · 363 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
19/20 level · 19/20 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Procter & Gamble Company PG | 22% | −2.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Interparfums, Inc. IPAR | 22% | −0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | 19% | −2.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD | 18% | −2.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Kenvue Inc. KVUE | 18% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Clorox Company CLX | 17% | +2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB | 15% | +0.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Helen of Troy Limited HELE | 15% | +124.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL | 6.7% | −1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB | 6.1% | +3.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC | 3.5% | −6.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Acme United Corporation ACU | 3.3% | −2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Newell Brands Inc. NWL | 2.2% | +0.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Magnera Corporation MAGN | 2.1% | +1.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS | 1.3% | +4.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| The Honest Company, Inc. HNST | -0.8% | −3.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF | -11% | −24.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD | -13% | −28.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Coty Inc. COTY | -29% | −7.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
20%
14%
22%
20%
19%
15%
20%
20%
18%
14%
20%
22%
18%
18%
20%
21%
16%
19%
20%
18%
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
22%
8.3%
20%
20%
21%
4.4%
19%
20%
21%
22%
21%
22%
21%
22%
22%
21%
21%
1.8%
18%
19%
Coty Inc. · COTY
1.3%
16%
4.8%
-6.6%
12%
13%
3.4%
9.5%
12%
14%
5.6%
2.5%
14%
16%
-22%
1.2%
12%
8.8%
-29%
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
8.1%
9.1%
2.1%
18%
13%
16%
4.3%
28%
19%
12%
5.3%
16%
9.3%
9.9%
13%
14%
2.2%
14%
-11%
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
26%
-5.8%
24%
19%
23%
7.5%
29%
18%
24%
5.7%
21%
19%
25%
10%
22%
18%
25%
7.1%
22%
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
14%
17%
20%
20%
14%
17%
18%
18%
14%
3.9%
17%
13%
15%
18%
17%
14%
20%
18%
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
13%
11%
14%
12%
13%
14%
15%
2.2%
15%
14%
17%
13%
25%
10%
16%
14%
15%
12%
18%
15%
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
10%
6.0%
9.1%
13%
1.8%
-12%
-2.0%
5.4%
-7.8%
-0.5%
1.0%
8.0%
-6.2%
0.5%
1.3%
8.8%
6.6%
-14%
2.2%
—
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. · SPB
4.0%
—
3.1%
1.0%
4.7%
—
-2.8%
-11%
-17%
3.6%
11%
6.1%
2.8%
6.4%
2.9%
4.5%
4.0%
4.0%
6.1%
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
12%
6.9%
13%
10%
9.9%
8.7%
-10%
14%
4.5%
7.8%
-1.2%
17%
10%
14%
15%
21%
8.7%
14%
17%
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
21%
26%
17%
2.2%
17%
12%
7.9%
-0.1%
2.8%
13%
14%
-6.0%
-3.6%
-15%
8.6%
-11%
4.9%
9.5%
6.7%
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
25%
25%
21%
22%
24%
24%
22%
24%
27%
27%
22%
24%
27%
27%
24%
24%
28%
26%
23%
22%
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
—
—
—
−3.8 pp
−0.6 pp
+1.1 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.1 pp
0.0 pp
+3.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.7 pp
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
—
—
—
−3.7 pp
−0.6 pp
−3.9 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.4 pp
+17.3 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.6 pp
−19.7 pp
−3.8 pp
−2.1 pp
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
—
—
−6.8 pp
+11.1 pp
−2.4 pp
−1.4 pp
+16.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.2 pp
−7.0 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.4 pp
−27.2 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.5 pp
−7.3 pp
−7.4 pp
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
—
—
—
+6.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+6.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+10.5 pp
+6.0 pp
−4.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−12.4 pp
−9.3 pp
−1.9 pp
+8.0 pp
−1.8 pp
−7.1 pp
+3.9 pp
−24.5 pp
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
—
—
—
−2.9 pp
−2.7 pp
+13.3 pp
+4.6 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.8 pp
−8.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+4.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.3 pp
−2.9 pp
−0.7 pp
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
—
+0.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−12.7 pp
−0.7 pp
−4.9 pp
+0.8 pp
+14.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.7 pp
−0.3 pp
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
—
—
—
−0.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+3.8 pp
+1.5 pp
−10.1 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+10.5 pp
+9.7 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.5 pp
−9.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.9 pp
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
—
—
—
+1.6 pp
−8.3 pp
−17.9 pp
−11.1 pp
−7.5 pp
−9.6 pp
+11.4 pp
+3.0 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.8 pp
+12.8 pp
−14.8 pp
+0.9 pp
—
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. · SPB
—
—
—
—
+0.7 pp
—
−5.9 pp
−11.6 pp
−21.7 pp
—
+13.4 pp
+16.7 pp
+19.8 pp
+2.8 pp
−7.7 pp
−1.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−2.4 pp
+3.2 pp
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
—
—
—
+2.5 pp
−2.2 pp
+1.8 pp
−23.1 pp
+3.9 pp
−5.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+9.1 pp
+2.6 pp
+5.5 pp
+6.2 pp
+15.8 pp
+4.7 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+2.7 pp
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
—
—
—
−3.7 pp
−4.5 pp
−13.6 pp
−9.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−14.0 pp
+1.4 pp
+5.6 pp
−5.9 pp
−6.4 pp
−27.9 pp
−4.9 pp
−5.4 pp
+8.5 pp
+24.0 pp
−1.9 pp
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
—
—
—
+3.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.8 pp
+3.9 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.1 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest Net profit among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at $16,144 million. Colgate-Palmolive Company is next at $2,161 million. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company leads with $16,144 million of TTM profit, 647.1% above Colgate-Palmolive Company. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (113.6% uncapped) growth from a $126 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · $16,144 million
Gap647.1% versus #2 · Colgate-Palmolive Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage18/20 companies · 373 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
18/20 level · 12/20 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unilever PLC UL | $3.3B | -3.5% | Jun 2026 |
| The Procter & Gamble Company PG | $3.1B | -15% | Jun 2026 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | $719M | -7.0% | Jun 2026 |
| Kenvue Inc. KVUE | $456M | 8.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB | $355M | -11% | Jun 2026 |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD | $203M | 6.3% | Jun 2026 |
| The Clorox Company CLX | $191M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL | $89M | -44% | Mar 2026 |
| Interparfums, Inc. IPAR | $57M | 3.6% | Mar 2026 |
| Helen of Troy Limited HELE | $48M | -11% | Jun 2026 |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB | $23M | 1,050% | Mar 2026 |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC | $4M | -81% | Mar 2026 |
| Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS | $2M | -98% | Mar 2026 |
| Acme United Corporation ACU | $1M | -50% | Mar 2026 |
| The Honest Company, Inc. HNST | $0M | -100% | Mar 2026 |
| Magnera Corporation MAGN | $-18M | -195% | Mar 2026 |
| Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD | $-21M | -155% | Mar 2026 |
| Newell Brands Inc. NWL | $-33M | 2.2% | Jun 2026 |
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF | $-49M | -275% | Mar 2026 |
| Coty Inc. COTY | $-406M | -474% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
$230M
$158M
$204M
$187M
$187M
$-165M
$203M
$221M
$178M
$154M
$228M
$244M
$-75M
$189M
$220M
$191M
$182M
$144M
$216M
$203M
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
$681M
$188M
$603M
$639M
$682M
$43M
$414M
$534M
$747M
$760M
$729M
$767M
$776M
$779M
$726M
$773M
$766M
$-5M
$681M
$719M
Coty Inc. · COTY
$229M
$260M
$54M
$-281M
$135M
$241M
$112M
$79M
$10M
$186M
$9M
$-107M
$91M
$31M
$-402M
$-74M
$74M
$-116M
$-406M
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
$6M
$6M
$2M
$14M
$12M
$19M
$16M
$53M
$33M
$27M
$15M
$48M
$19M
$17M
$28M
$33M
$3M
$39M
$-49M
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
$50M
$-5M
$46M
$35M
$53M
$17M
$71M
$43M
$66M
$8M
$53M
$47M
$77M
$27M
$55M
$41M
$83M
$28M
$57M
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
$458M
$528M
$604M
$586M
$361M
$469M
$430M
$438M
$296M
$58M
$383M
$293M
$322M
$420M
$398M
$330M
$474M
$456M
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
$458M
$351M
$512M
$412M
$441M
$480M
$532M
$36M
$541M
$459M
$597M
$401M
$775M
$305M
$426M
$397M
$298M
$332M
$521M
$355M
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
$190M
$96M
$228M
$199M
$19M
$-249M
$-102M
$18M
$-218M
$-86M
$-9M
$45M
$-198M
$-54M
$-37M
$46M
$21M
$-315M
$-33M
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
$143M
$72M
$152M
$104M
$87M
$102M
$-209M
$181M
$25M
$96M
$-50M
$221M
$103M
$194M
$191M
$336M
$82M
$161M
$191M
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
$695M
$1.1B
$573M
$50M
$490M
$397M
$155M
$-32M
$36M
$324M
$335M
$-286M
$-156M
$-590M
$159M
$-546M
$47M
$162M
$89M
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
$4.1B
$4.2B
$3.4B
$3.1B
$4.0B
$4.0B
$3.4B
$3.4B
$4.6B
$3.5B
$3.8B
$3.1B
$4.0B
$4.7B
$3.8B
$3.6B
$4.8B
$4.3B
$4.0B
$3.1B
Unilever PLC · UL
—
$3.2B
—
$3.2B
—
$5.1B
—
$3.9B
—
$2.8B
—
$3.6B
—
$2.5B
—
$3.4B
—
$2.8B
—
$3.3B
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
—
—
—
-14%
-19%
-204%
-0.5%
18%
-4.8%
—
12%
10%
-142%
23%
-3.5%
-22%
—
-24%
-1.8%
6.3%
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
—
—
—
-14%
0.2%
-77%
-31%
-16%
9.5%
1,667%
76%
44%
3.9%
2.5%
-0.4%
0.8%
-1.3%
-101%
-6.2%
-7.0%
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
—
—
—
-41%
-7.3%
107%
—
-93%
-23%
-92%
-235%
810%
-83%
-4,567%
—
-19%
-474%
—
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
—
—
—
75%
100%
217%
700%
279%
175%
42%
-6.3%
-9.4%
-42%
-37%
87%
-31%
-84%
129%
-275%
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
—
—
—
21%
6.0%
—
54%
23%
25%
-53%
-25%
9.3%
17%
238%
3.8%
-13%
7.8%
3.7%
3.6%
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
—
-21%
-11%
-29%
-25%
-18%
-88%
-11%
-33%
8.8%
624%
3.9%
13%
47%
8.6%
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
—
—
—
7.9%
-3.7%
37%
3.9%
-91%
23%
-4.4%
12%
1,014%
43%
-34%
-29%
-1.0%
-62%
8.9%
22%
-11%
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
—
—
—
1.0%
-90%
-359%
-145%
-91%
-1,247%
—
—
150%
—
—
—
2.2%
—
—
—
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
—
—
—
4.0%
-39%
42%
-238%
74%
-71%
-5.9%
—
22%
312%
102%
—
52%
-20%
-17%
0.0%
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
—
—
—
-95%
-30%
-64%
-73%
-164%
-93%
-18%
116%
—
-533%
-282%
-53%
—
—
—
-44%
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
—
—
—
5.2%
-4.0%
-6.7%
1.7%
11%
15%
-12%
10%
-7.3%
-12%
33%
0.3%
15%
20%
-7.0%
4.2%
-15%
Unilever PLC · UL
—
27%
—
-5.3%
—
57%
—
21%
—
-45%
—
-7.6%
—
-11%
—
-5.0%
—
14%
—
-3.5%
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest ROCE among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 24.6%. Church & Dwight Co., Inc. is next at 14.6%. Helen of Troy Limited has the highest ROCE change at +21.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: The Procter & Gamble Company leads ROCE at 24.6%, 10 percentage points above Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. Helen of Troy Limited has the strongest latest improvement at +21.1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderThe Procter & Gamble Company · 24.6%
Gap68.5% versus #2 · Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/20 companies · 380 observations
Investor read: The Procter & Gamble Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
20/20 level · 20/20 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Procter & Gamble Company PG | 25% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD | 15% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | 9.5% | −0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Clorox Company CLX | 8.7% | +2.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Interparfums, Inc. IPAR | 6.3% | −0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB | 6.0% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Unilever PLC UL | 4.9% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Kenvue Inc. KVUE | 3.3% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Newell Brands Inc. NWL | 3.3% | +1.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Helen of Troy Limited HELE | 3.2% | +21.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL | 1.7% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB | 1.5% | +0.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Acme United Corporation ACU | 1.1% | −0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC | 0.6% | −0.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Magnera Corporation MAGN | 0.5% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS | 0.4% | +1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| The Honest Company, Inc. HNST | -0.4% | −1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF | -3.2% | −7.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD | -3.9% | −15.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Coty Inc. COTY | -4.4% | −1.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
17%
17%
16%
15%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
15%
14%
15%
15%
16%
15%
15%
15%
16%
15%
15%
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
8.6%
3.2%
7.7%
7.6%
8.1%
1.8%
7.9%
8.5%
8.9%
9.2%
9.1%
9.6%
9.4%
9.7%
10%
9.9%
9.5%
0.9%
9.4%
9.5%
Coty Inc. · COTY
0.1%
2.2%
0.5%
-0.7%
1.7%
2.0%
0.4%
1.3%
2.1%
2.4%
0.8%
0.4%
2.4%
2.8%
-3.0%
0.2%
1.9%
1.7%
-4.4%
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
1.8%
2.1%
0.5%
4.9%
3.4%
5.2%
1.8%
12%
7.5%
5.0%
2.6%
7.0%
3.7%
4.0%
4.7%
4.8%
0.5%
4.4%
-3.2%
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
8.4%
-1.5%
7.4%
5.2%
7.3%
2.5%
9.4%
5.9%
9.2%
1.9%
6.6%
6.4%
9.8%
3.4%
6.9%
5.2%
9.0%
2.4%
6.3%
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
0.0%
1.4%
—
—
2.1%
1.4%
4.1%
6.3%
3.2%
2.1%
0.7%
3.0%
2.3%
2.7%
3.3%
3.0%
2.6%
3.8%
3.3%
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
6.3%
4.7%
6.3%
5.8%
6.2%
6.6%
7.0%
1.0%
7.4%
6.4%
8.0%
5.1%
10%
4.2%
6.4%
6.0%
6.2%
5.2%
7.7%
6.0%
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
2.5%
1.5%
2.0%
3.2%
0.4%
-2.6%
-0.3%
1.2%
-1.6%
-0.1%
0.2%
1.8%
-1.4%
0.1%
0.2%
2.0%
1.4%
-3.2%
0.4%
3.3%
The Clorox Company · CLX
4.9%
2.7%
5.6%
4.2%
4.4%
3.8%
-5.3%
6.8%
1.6%
3.8%
-0.6%
7.7%
4.6%
6.1%
6.6%
11%
3.5%
6.8%
8.7%
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
6.4%
9.3%
4.8%
0.5%
4.3%
3.5%
1.9%
0.0%
0.6%
3.6%
3.3%
-1.4%
-0.7%
-3.7%
1.9%
-2.6%
1.1%
2.8%
1.7%
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
22%
22%
22%
22%
23%
23%
23%
22%
23%
25%
24%
24%
24%
24%
24%
24%
24%
24%
24%
25%
Unilever PLC · UL
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
6.1%
6.1%
5.1%
5.1%
3.3%
3.3%
5.0%
5.0%
3.3%
3.3%
4.6%
4.6%
4.1%
4.1%
4.9%
4.9%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
—
—
—
—
−2.4 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.6 pp
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
−1.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.8 pp
+7.4 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
−8.8 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.4 pp
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
—
—
—
+1.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.4 pp
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
—
—
—
—
+1.6 pp
+3.1 pp
+1.3 pp
+7.2 pp
+4.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.8 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.1 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−7.9 pp
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
—
—
—
—
−1.1 pp
+4.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.8 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.6 pp
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
+2.1 pp
0.0 pp
—
—
+1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−3.4 pp
−3.3 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.6 pp
0.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.1 pp
0.0 pp
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
—
—
—
—
−0.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.7 pp
−4.8 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.1 pp
+2.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.6 pp
+0.9 pp
−3.8 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.3 pp
0.0 pp
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
—
—
—
—
−2.1 pp
−4.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.8 pp
−3.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.3 pp
The Clorox Company · CLX
—
—
—
—
−0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
−10.9 pp
+2.6 pp
−2.8 pp
0.0 pp
+4.7 pp
+0.9 pp
+3.0 pp
+2.3 pp
+7.2 pp
+3.2 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.1 pp
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
—
—
—
—
−2.1 pp
−5.8 pp
−2.9 pp
−0.5 pp
−3.7 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.3 pp
−7.3 pp
−1.4 pp
−1.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+6.5 pp
−0.2 pp
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
—
—
—
—
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
Unilever PLC · UL
—
—
—
—
+1.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.3 pp
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Helen of Troy Limited has the lowest PEG among the 20 Household & Personal Products companies compared here, at 0.42×. Church & Dwight Co., Inc. is next at 0.66×. Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 6.62×, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 20 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Helen of Troy Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.42×, 36.4% below Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. Only 12 of 20 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderHelen of Troy Limited · 0.42×
Gap36.4% versus #2 · Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/20 companies · 52 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
12/20 level · 20/20 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. ELF | 5.4 | 137.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Coty Inc. COTY | 3.5 | 20,311.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Acme United Corporation ACU | 2.8 | 19.4 | Mar 2026 |
| The Procter & Gamble Company PG | 2.4 | 21.7 | Jun 2026 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB | 2.4 | 18.7 | Jun 2026 |
| Oddity Tech Ltd. ODD | 2.3 | 16.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company CL | 2.2 | 36.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SPB | 2.2 | 14.1 | Mar 2026 |
| Interparfums, Inc. IPAR | 2.0 | 17.2 | Mar 2026 |
| The Clorox Company CLX | 1.6 | 16.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Kenvue Inc. KVUE | 1.3 | 22.0 | Jun 2026 |
| Church & Dwight Co., Inc. CHD | 0.7 | 30.8 | Jun 2026 |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company EPC | 0.5 | 38.4 | Mar 2026 |
| Helen of Troy Limited HELE | 0.4 | 10.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Unilever PLC UL | — | 12.4 | Jun 2026 |
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. EL | — | 178.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Newell Brands Inc. NWL | — | 27.8 | Jun 2026 |
| The Honest Company, Inc. HNST | — | 61.3 | Mar 2026 |
| Magnera Corporation MAGN | — | 12.2 | Mar 2026 |
| Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. NUS | — | 6.6 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 14 companies with a series here. The remaining 2 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
1.0
1.0
0.7
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
1.0
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
3.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Edgewell Personal Care Company · EPC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.4
0.8
1.9
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.2
—
—
—
3.6
1.2
1.9
2.0
—
—
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
1.0
0.5
0.4
1.3
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.8
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
2.4
—
—
—
—
Oddity Tech Ltd. · ODD
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
—
—
0.5
1.5
3.5
2.3
—
—
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. · SPB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
—
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.6
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.5
—
3.9
—
—
5.0
—
2.9
1.2
2.8
2.4
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 20 companies with a series here. The remaining 8 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · CHD
24.7
30.2
29.7
28.8
23.6
—
52.3
54.8
51.6
30.8
32.6
31.6
—
43.8
46.9
45.1
27.3
27.3
30.2
30.8
Colgate-Palmolive Company · CL
24.2
33.5
31.3
34.7
30.5
37.0
39.1
42.8
37.0
28.8
28.5
28.1
29.8
25.9
26.5
25.5
22.4
30.1
33.2
36.4
Coty Inc. · COTY
—
210.0
69.2
100.1
63.2
61.1
60.3
21.6
26.1
35.4
52.0
111.3
52.9
20,311.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · ELF
85.4
87.4
63.0
57.9
59.7
65.1
74.2
64.5
51.3
63.9
88.7
100.3
58.9
74.3
32.7
73.2
93.3
43.0
137.8
—
Interparfums, Inc. · IPAR
23.0
38.9
29.6
23.3
23.4
25.5
32.6
29.5
27.1
30.3
32.4
26.4
27.8
25.7
22.2
26.3
19.3
16.2
17.2
—
Kenvue Inc. · KVUE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
25.2
21.4
27.5
31.3
42.3
39.9
43.1
28.2
21.9
22.6
20.6
22.0
Kimberly-Clark Corporation · KMB
22.5
26.7
23.7
25.6
21.3
23.7
23.0
28.5
23.2
23.3
23.8
20.5
18.5
17.4
19.4
17.8
21.0
16.6
15.1
18.7
Newell Brands Inc. · NWL
12.4
15.1
12.1
10.9
10.7
27.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
The Clorox Company · CLX
47.9
87.6
37.7
37.8
39.4
40.1
272.8
132.5
192.7
226.3
79.3
60.7
56.8
44.4
26.4
18.4
19.4
16.5
16.8
—
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. · EL
36.4
41.8
29.8
38.9
36.0
60.4
81.9
70.4
95.1
112.5
86.6
98.5
178.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
The Procter & Gamble Company · PG
24.5
27.8
25.6
23.9
21.1
25.7
25.0
24.9
23.0
23.8
25.7
26.7
29.0
26.0
26.3
23.8
21.8
20.7
20.6
21.7
Unilever PLC · UL
21.4
20.4
18.0
19.4
17.1
15.7
15.3
14.7
16.0
17.1
17.9
19.5
23.7
23.8
24.3
23.2
16.6
12.9
11.5
12.4
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Household & Personal Products comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 20 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 20 Household & Personal Products companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Household & Personal Products company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Household & Personal Products comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 20 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Household & Personal Products sector outperforming S&P 500?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 14.4% over 52 weeks and 9.8% over 13 weeks. 8 of 20 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 20 beat the sector itself.
Which Household & Personal Products company is largest by revenue?
The Procter & Gamble Company leads with revenue of $87,033 million, based on 18 of 20 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Household & Personal Products company is growing fastest?
Magnera Corporation has the fastest current revenue growth at 35.3%, across 18 of 20 comparable companies.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Helen of Troy Limited ranks first at 67.7/100 with 70.7% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Helen of Troy Limited has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.42, among 12 of 20 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Household & Personal Products comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Household & Personal Products company is the biggest?
The Procter & Gamble Company is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $87,033 million, ahead of Colgate-Palmolive Company at $21,046 million. That covers 18 of 20 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Household & Personal Products company has the best profit margins?
The Procter & Gamble Company has the highest operating margin at 22.1%, from 19 of 20 comparable companies. Helen of Troy Limited shows the biggest improvement (+124.5 percentage points — see the chart above for the starting level). A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Household & Personal Products company makes the most profit?
The Procter & Gamble Company earns the most, at $16,144 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 18 of 20 comparable companies. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Household & Personal Products company earns the highest return on capital?
The Procter & Gamble Company leads on return on capital employed at 24.6%, across 20 of 20 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Household & Personal Products stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Helen of Troy Limited screens cheapest at 0.42×. Only 12 of 20 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Household & Personal Products sector beating the market?
Household & Personal Products has underperformed S&P 500 by 14.4% over the last 52 weeks and 9.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 8 of 20 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Household & Personal Products stock has the strongest price momentum?
The Honest Company, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Household & Personal Products company scores highest for research priority?
Helen of Troy Limited scores 67.7 out of 100 with 70.7% evidence confidence, from 23.9 points on growth and earnings, 12.4 on capital efficiency, 16.3 on valuation and 15.1 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Household & Personal Products companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 20 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Household & Personal Products sector?
The 20 Household & Personal Products companies on this page carry $699,595 million of combined market value. The Procter & Gamble Company is the largest at $341,479 million, about 49% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.
What is the Household & Personal Products sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 20 Household & Personal Products companies on this page is 21.7×, measured on the 20 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.
How is the Household & Personal Products sector performing?
8 of the 20 covered Household & Personal Products companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 14.4% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.
How many Household & Personal Products stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 20 listed Household & Personal Products companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!