Chemplast Sanmar share price today

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's share price was ₹207.56 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 91 weeks. That is 9.8% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹170 and ₹377, and at that close it sat 18% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Chemplast Sanmar Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 8 weeks in a row.

Over the last 5.2 years the share price moved −62% while the NIFTY 500 moved +50%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: lowest operating margin in 15 quarters and foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row.

1. Lowest operating margin in 15 quarters

   Operating margin was -10% in the June 2026 quarter, against 1.6% a year earlier.

   Next results: check whether PVC earnings improve as the costly old raw material is used up and the gap between raw material cost and selling price is earned.

   From the earnings call on 7 Aug 2026.

2. Foreign funds (FIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 13.2% to 10.7% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Chemplast Sanmar reported revenue of ₹1,125 crore, up 2.3% from ₹1,100 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹176 crore.

Chemplast Sanmar results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Chemplast Sanmar's management discussed these results on a call held on 7 August 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Chemplast Sanmar closed at ₹207.56 on 4 November 2026, down 45.0% from ₹377.45 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 69.1% over five years. Its highest weekly close since August 2021 was ₹801.75 on 8 October 2021.

Chemplast Sanmar share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

278 weekly closes from 27 August 2021 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Chemplast Sanmar closed at ₹207.56, up 9.4% on the week and up 8.4% on the month. 7 Aug 2026: Chemplast Sanmar held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: Cuddalore Paste PVC 7,000-ton debottleneck commissioned in October 2026.

Earlier

• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 2.3% on a year earlier.

Chemplast Sanmar has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (27 August 2021), the start of the period we checked.

No. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 8 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 7 August 2026, Chemplast Sanmar's management guided: Cuddalore Paste PVC 7,000-ton debottleneck commissioned in October 2026.

“The current market spread is around $160. That will give us a reasonably healthy EBITDA margin on an annualized basis.”Dr. Krishnakumar Elanchery, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• CMCD ₹1,000 crore revenue goal remains on track; positive momentum expected through FY27.
• R32 new capacity online by fiscal year-end, with full ramp-up in the last quarter and first quarter of next fiscal year; domestic and international partner tie-ups planned.
• Reasonable performance expected from Q3 as high-cost VCM washes out and market spreads are realized.
• Operating profit-neutral at an average PVC-VCM spread of $120-$130; profit before tax-positive at roughly $20-$30 above that.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 7 August 2026.

When Chemplast Sanmar reports July to September 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Karaikal PVC plant restoration - check authority clearance, restart timing and any quantified production or financial impact.

Chemplast Sanmar is not on any of our India lists this week.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd posted a net loss of ₹176 Cr in the Jun 2026 quarter. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹280 Cr. That loss is 15.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹64.0 Cr. 10 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd reported ₹1,125 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +2.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 7 years it has grown 18.9% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹4,224 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹4,249 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹4,224 Cr, −2.8% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −1.4% on average, against 18.9% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew −1.2%, against +2.2% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over).

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's operating margin was −10.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 11.6 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 years it has been between 0.6% and 23.0%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −11.7 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −8.7 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 193% of Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹294 Cr of operating cash against −₹280 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹304 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹10.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 193% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 75 days longer between FY21 and FY26, so more of each rupee of profit waits in the business before it arrives.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 3.0× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was −133 days in FY26, up from −208 days in FY21. It spent ₹1,702 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 8 days to pay, and stock sits for 82 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹4,224 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹11.6 Cr, so roughly −₹1,539 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 8 days to pay and stock sat for 82 days, about 2.7 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of −133 days, longer than FY21's −208.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 82 days. Customers pay about 8 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 224 days. Together that makes the −133-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹1,702 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹563 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹341 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's P/E is 210.2×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 92% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 16.9×, over 2.5 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 12 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The latest quarter’s profit includes a one-off item bigger than the normal business, so the profit line is shown but does not count in this reading.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd earned a ROCE of 0% in FY26. That is up from a low of −2% in FY24. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 14.1 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses.

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

It comes from a −6.6% net margin and 0.67× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a −6.6% net margin × 0.67× asset turnover × 3.60× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ −15.9% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: −2.1% − 12.0% = −14.1 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

The −2.1% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 0.7%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd has total debt of ₹1,952 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,755 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 1.11× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.52 in FY22 to 1.11 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in Chemplast Sanmar Ltd by 3.3 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 22.4% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −2.8 points over the same period, to 10.7%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −3.3 points over 8 quarters, to 22.4%; Foreign institutions: −2.8 points over 8 quarters, to 10.7%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 55.0%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−3.3 points), together with foreign institutions (−2.8 points). They reduced their stake.

For Chemplast Sanmar Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

23.4 out of 100, rank 7 of 7 in Petrochem - Polymers, with 68% of the evidence available.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd scores 23.4 out of 100 against the 7 companies it is compared with in Petrochem - Polymers, ranking 7. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 6.8 + 0.6 + 10 + 6 = 23.4. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Chemplast Sanmar ranks 7 of 7 Petrochem - Polymers companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 23.4 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Petrochem - Polymers, all 7 compared on one page.

Chemplast Sanmar is the 3rd largest of 7 Petrochem - Polymers companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Supreme Petrochem and Styrenix Performance Materials. Just below it: Bhansali Engineering Polymers, NOCIL, Manali Petrochemicals and Kothari Petrochemicals.

Petrochem - Polymers companies close in size

1. Supreme Petrochem Ltd ₹12,755 crore
2. Styrenix Performance Materials Ltd ₹3,087 crore
3. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd ₹3,000 crore
4. Bhansali Engineering Polymers Ltd ₹2,641 crore
5. NOCIL Ltd ₹2,290 crore
6. Manali Petrochemicals Ltd ₹1,176 crore
7. Kothari Petrochemicals Ltd ₹642 crore

All 7 Petrochem - Polymers companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1044. Nilkamal Ltd ₹3,010 crore · Plastics - Plastic & Plastic Products
1045. Shringar House of Mangalsutra Ltd ₹3,010 crore · Diamond, Gems & Jewellery
1046. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd ₹3,000 crore
1047. Monolithisch India Ltd ₹3,000 crore · Refractories
1048. AGI Infra Ltd ₹2,999 crore · Realty - Construction & Contracting

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.