Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Silicom Ltd.

SILC
Technology · Communication Equipment

Silicom Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 0% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving, and 0% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Price
$46.5
+164.0% 1Y
Revenue (Mar 26)
$0.0 B
+100.0% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
$0.0 B
Operating margin
0.0%
flat YoY
ROE
−8%
FY25
ROIC
−12.0%
vs WACC 12.4% → −24.4 pp
Cash conversion
0%
of profit, last 2 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Silicom Ltd. trades at $46.5, between stages. That is +75.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 96% of a 52-week range of $14 to $48. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (2 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $46.5 it trades +75.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 96% of its 52-week range ($14–$48).

Aug 26: $46.5 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+75.7% versus the 200-day line, week — of stage —
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$50.8$40.8$30.8$20.8$10.7$$47$27Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26Aug 26
$50.8$40.8$30.8$20.8$10.7$$47$27Jul 25Jan 26Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (57 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 25Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +201% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

P/E does not price Silicom Ltd. — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. A P/E returns here the first period the bottom line turns positive.

With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.

PEG 1.23 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 19 quarters.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
1.25×1.18×1.11×1.05×0.98××1.23×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Dec 24Mar 26
1.25×1.18×1.11×1.05×0.98××1.23×Sep 21Dec 23Mar 26
P/E
earnings negative
PEG
n/m
not derivable — 3-year earnings growth unavailable

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Silicom Ltd. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 12 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +0.0% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
21%128%1.7%27%−17%−75%−36%−177%−55%−278%%%0%−250%FY21FY23FY25
21%128%1.7%27%−17%−75%−36%−177%−55%−278%%%0%−250%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
114%78%64%−23%15%−125%−34%−226%−83%−328%%%100%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
114%78%64%−23%15%−125%−34%−226%−83%−328%%%100%−300%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
12%8.5%5.4%2.3%−0.9%%0%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
12%8.5%5.4%2.3%−0.9%%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Recovering
latest +100.0% · span −69.2% to +100.0%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 0.0% · span 0.0%–10.8%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+0.0%−26.3%
Stock price+164.0%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+100.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−17.6%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

51.1/100 — rank 11 of 29 in Communication Equipment · 58% evidence confidence

Silicom Ltd. scores 51.1 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Communication Equipment, ranking 11. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18 + 5 + 11.1 + 17 = 51.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Silicom Ltd. reported $0.0 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at −17.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.1 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.1 B (+0.0% on the year), capping 4 years at −17.6% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.0 B, +100.0% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $0.1 B (+0.0% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−17.6% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
0.1621%0.121.7%0.08−17%0.04−36%0.00−55%$ B%$0B0%FY21FY23FY25
0.1621%0.121.7%0.08−17%0.04−36%0.00−55%$ B%$0B0%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.0 B (+100.0% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
0.04114%0.0363%0.0213%0.01−38%0.00−89%$ B%$0B100%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.04114%0.0363%0.0213%0.01−38%0.00−89%$ B%$0B100%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +100.0% growth against the decade's −17.6% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +100.0% over the last 4 quarters against −10.6%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Silicom Ltd.'s operating margin is 0.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −25.0% to 13.3%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 0.0%, +0.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −25.0%–13.3%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.0 pp year on year while gross margin went +50.0 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: −16.7% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a −25.0–13.3% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
16%12%5.3%−1.5%−5.8%−15%−17%−29%−28%−42%%%−16.7%0%FY21FY23FY25
16%12%5.3%−1.5%−5.8%−15%−17%−29%−28%−42%%%−16.7%0%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: 0.0% operating margin (+0.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
16%234%−42%112%−100%−10%−158%−132%−216%−254%%%0%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
16%234%−42%112%−100%−10%−158%−132%−216%−254%%%0%0%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Silicom Ltd. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of $0.01 B. That is 0.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $−0.0 B (null).

FY25 profit $−0.0 B (null YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
0.02128%0.0127%−0.01−75%−0.02−177%−0.03−278%$ B%$0B−250%FY21FY23FY25
0.02128%0.0127%−0.01−75%−0.02−177%−0.03−278%$ B%$0B−250%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: $0.0 B (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.002−76%−0.006−163%−0.015−250%−0.024−337%−0.032−424%$ B%$0B−400%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.002−76%−0.006−163%−0.015−250%−0.024−337%−0.032−424%$ B%$0B−400%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 2 fiscal years 0% of Silicom Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was $0.0 B of operating cash against $−0.0 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $0.0 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY25: operating cash of $0.0 B against reported profit of $−0.0 B, leaving free cash of $0.0 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 2 fiscal years the conversion rate is 0% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $0.0 B vs profit $−0.0 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
0% of 2-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
0.030.020.00−0.02−0.03$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
0.030.020.00−0.02−0.03$ B$0B$0B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 19: operating cash $0.0 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)100%
0.011101.2%0.008100.6%0.005100.0%0.00399.4%0.00098.8%$ B%$0BMar 17Jun 18Dec 19
0.011101.2%0.008100.6%0.005100.0%0.00399.4%0.00098.8%$ B%$0BMar 17Jun 18Dec 19

🚨 Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Silicom Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $0.0 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
1.20.60.0−0.6−1.2$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
1.20.60.0−0.6−1.2$ B$0BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 19: capex $0.0 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
1.20.0110.60.0080.00.005−0.60.002−1.2−0.001$ B$ B$0B$0BMar 17Jun 18Dec 19
1.20.0110.60.0080.00.005−0.60.002−1.2−0.001$ B$ B$0B$0BMar 17Jun 18Dec 19

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Silicom Ltd. earns a ROE of −8% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −20% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −24.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −16.7% net margin on 0.40× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −8%, recovered from a FY23 trough of −20% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): −16.7% net margin × 0.40× asset turns × 1.25× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −8.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −12.0% − 12.4% = a −24.4 pp spread. The 12.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY25: ROE −8% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.4% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's −20%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
15%5.0%−5.2%−15%−26%%−8.3%−17.8%FY21FY23FY25
15%5.0%−5.2%−15%−26%%−8.3%−17.8%FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: ROIC −18.1% (TTM) vs WACC 12.4% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
17%1.4%−14%−29%−44%%−18.1%−8.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
17%1.4%−14%−29%−44%%−18.1%−8.9%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Silicom Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Silicom Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Silicom Ltd. carries total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.1 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.08 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.06 in FY21 to 0.08 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of $0.0 B against shareholder equity of $0.1 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.08. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.06 (FY21) to 0.08 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt $0.0 B at 0.08× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
0.0110.082×0.0080.076×0.0050.070×0.0030.064×0.0000.058×$ B×$0B0.08×FY21FY23FY25
0.0110.082×0.0080.076×0.0050.070×0.0030.064×0.0000.058×$ B×$0B0.08×FY21FY23FY25
Mar 26: debt $0.0 B, debt-to-equity 0.08 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
0.0110.082×0.0080.074×0.0050.065×0.0030.056×0.0000.048×$ B×$0B0.08×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
0.0110.082×0.0080.074×0.0050.065×0.0030.056×0.0000.048×$ B×$0B0.08×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Silicom Ltd., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 0.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Silicom Ltd.: the Z-score reads 3.21. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits well clear of distress. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.21 sits well clear of the distress zone — the balance sheet is not the risk here.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 3.21.

15 · Related companies · Communication Equipment
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Cisco Systems, Inc.CSCO 64.4/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence LEADER 19.0/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT 22.1% · OPM change 2.4 pp 95% evidence 16.6/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 25% 76% evidence 12.7/20 P/E 29× · PEG 1.13 65% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 4.9% · RS bench 27.3% · 1Y 69.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19 + 16.6 + 12.7 + 16.1 = 64.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Hewlett Packard Enterprise CompanyHPE 64.4/100Mixed-positive evidence77% evidence LEADER 26.5/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 6.9% · OPM change 21.5 pp 71% evidence 12.1/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 7% 76% evidence 6.3/20 P/E 26.9× · PEG 3.33 65% evidence 19.5/20 RS sector 36.7% · RS bench 64.7% · 1Y 151.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.5 + 12.1 + 6.3 + 19.5 = 64.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Ubiquiti Inc.UI 62.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 24.5/35 Revenue 33.4% · PAT 71.8% · OPM change 2.7 pp 83% evidence 21.9/25 ROCE 31.6% · OPM 36.9% 76% evidence 14.1/20 P/E 50.8× · PEG 0.6 65% evidence 2.1/20 RS sector -37.5% · RS bench -22.9% · 1Y 19.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 21.9 + 14.1 + 2.1 = 62.6 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -37.5% and the one-year return is 19.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
4Lumentum Holdings Inc.LITE 62.3/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 25.7/35 Revenue 69.1% · PAT — · OPM change 30.5 pp 62% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 21.6% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 130.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.3/20 RS sector 31.1% · RS bench 47.7% · 1Y 630.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.7 + 14.3 + 9 + 13.3 = 62.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Ciena CorporationCIEN 60.8/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 30.7/35 Revenue 30.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 12.2 pp 95% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 15.1% 76% evidence 3.7/20 P/E 178.4× · PEG 4.55 65% evidence 10.4/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 20.1% · 1Y 332.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.7 + 16 + 3.7 + 10.4 = 60.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Zebra Technologies CorporationZBRA 56.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 14.4% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 24.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.4/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench 27.2% · 1Y 16.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17 + 14.1 + 10.5 + 14.4 = 56 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Harmonic Inc.HLIT 55.6/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence FADING 22.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 14 pp 45% evidence 13.7/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 16.8% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 24× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.8/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 38.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 13.7 + 10.7 + 8.8 = 55.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Extreme Networks, Inc.EXTR 53.4/100Mixed-positive evidence74% evidence LEADER 19.5/35 Revenue 14.9% · PAT — · OPM change 1.9 pp 62% evidence 11.6/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence 4.7/20 P/E 125.7× · PEG 3.38 65% evidence 17.6/20 RS sector 14.9% · RS bench 41.1% · 1Y 62.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 11.6 + 4.7 + 17.6 = 53.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Viasat, Inc.VSAT 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence LEADER 18.1/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT — · OPM change 13.3 pp 62% evidence 6.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -0.1% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 3.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 34.9% · RS bench 59.4% · 1Y 236.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 6.7 + 11.4 + 16.1 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Digi International Inc.DGII 51.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence LEADER 14.2/35 Revenue 13.4% · PAT 2.4% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence 13.5/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 13.1% 76% evidence 7.5/20 P/E 42.7× · PEG 2.32 65% evidence 16.2/20 RS sector 9.5% · RS bench 31.6% · 1Y 126.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.2 + 13.5 + 7.5 + 16.2 = 51.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 31.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
11Silicom Ltd.this pageSILC 51.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 18.0/35 Revenue 15.5% · PAT — · OPM change 7.6 pp 62% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -2.2% · OPM -14.7% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 12.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 45.3% · RS bench 69.4% · 1Y 180.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 5 + 11.1 + 17 = 51.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Belden Inc.BDC 50.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 45% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 11.2% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 19.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.5/20 RS sector -24.4% · RS bench -4.8% · 1Y 7.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 14.4 + 10.9 + 8.5 = 50.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.GILT 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence68% evidence ASLEEP 23.0/35 Revenue 46% · PAT -7.7% · OPM change 7 pp 62% evidence 9.6/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 4% 76% evidence 14.2/20 P/E 29.5× · PEG 0.77 65% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -37.9% · RS bench -23.7% · 1Y 35.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 9.6 + 14.2 + 3.6 = 50.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -37.9% and the one-year return is 35.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
14BK Technologies CorporationBKTI 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 14.8/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 40% · OPM change 0.1 pp 83% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 15.4% 76% evidence 15.8/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG 0.55 65% evidence 5.8/20 RS sector -25.6% · RS bench -8% · 1Y 100.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 13.9 + 15.8 + 5.8 = 50.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
15Viavi Solutions Inc.VIAV 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 16.6/35 Revenue 30.6% · PAT -1220% · OPM change 3.1 pp 83% evidence 10.0/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 6.1% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 174.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.9/20 RS sector 13% · RS bench 29.1% · 1Y 268.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 10 + 8.9 + 11.9 = 47.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Motorola Solutions, Inc.MSI 47.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 13.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.7 pp 45% evidence 15.8/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 19.3% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 35.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -25.6% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y -2.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 15.8 + 9.8 + 8.4 = 47 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.AAOI 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue 64.6% · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 62% evidence 4.8/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM -8.6% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 39.7% · RS bench 53.6% · 1Y 509.7%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 4.8 + 10 + 13.4 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Vistance Networks, Inc.VISN 46.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence TURNING 23.0/35 Revenue 36.3% · PAT 90.4% · OPM change 9.2 pp 83% evidence 7.9/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 5% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 0.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -45.1% · RS bench -30.3% · 1Y -19.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 7.9 + 11.5 + 4.3 = 46.7 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -45.1% and the one-year return is -19.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
19AST SpaceMobile, Inc.ASTS 43.2/100Thin evidence · provisional57% evidence ASLEEP 24.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 7755.2 pp 62% evidence 5.3/25 ROCE -4.2% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.2/20 RS sector -32.4% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y 50.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.7 + 5.3 + 10 + 3.2 = 43.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Ondas Inc.ONDS 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 25.7/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 157.6 pp 62% evidence 3.7/25 ROCE -3.6% · OPM -85.1% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 129.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -25.8% · RS bench -9% · 1Y 149.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.7 + 3.7 + 9.1 + 3.8 = 42.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -25.8% and the one-year return is 149.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
21Nokia OyjNOK 42.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.9 pp 45% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM 1.4% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 89.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.5/20 RS sector -7.6% · RS bench 8.4% · 1Y 142%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 8.9 + 9.3 + 7.5 = 42.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22Lantronix, Inc.LTRX 40.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence ASLEEP 17.7/35 Revenue -16.8% · PAT — · OPM change 8.9 pp 62% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -3.7% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -20.3% · RS bench -2.2% · 1Y 104%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 5.5 + 10 + 7.6 = 40.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Telesat CorporationTSAT 40.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 8.0/35 Revenue -27.5% · PAT — · OPM change -21.7 pp 62% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM 2% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 5.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 18.6% · RS bench 41.7% · 1Y 160.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8 + 6 + 11.3 + 15.2 = 40.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 41.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
24Frequency Electronics, Inc.FEIM 40.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence TURNING 10.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.8 pp 45% evidence 5.9/25 ROCE -9.1% · OPM 7.5% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 71.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.2/20 RS sector 9.2% · RS bench 30.5% · 1Y 138.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 5.9 + 9.5 + 14.2 = 40.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25AudioCodes Ltd.AUDC 39.6/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence TURNING 10.1/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT -61.1% · OPM change -0.6 pp 83% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 5.4% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 33.6× · PEG 1.38 65% evidence 7.9/20 RS sector -20.5% · RS bench -0.2% · 1Y 1.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 10.1 + 10.9 + 10.7 + 7.9 = 39.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
26ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.ADTN 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 20.0/35 Revenue 18.7% · PAT — · OPM change 3.8 pp 62% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 469× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.3/20 RS sector -40.7% · RS bench -28.4% · 1Y 2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20 + 7.7 + 8.6 + 3.3 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27Clearfield, Inc.CLFD 36.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 13.1/35 Revenue -18.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change -10.1 pp 83% evidence 7.1/25 ROCE -0.8% · OPM -6% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 4341× · PEG 1.17 65% evidence 5.5/20 RS sector -25.8% · RS bench -7.6% · 1Y 2.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.1 + 7.1 + 10.3 + 5.5 = 36 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
28NETGEAR, Inc.NTGR 33.6/100Adverse evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 12.0/35 Revenue 3.9% · PAT -200% · OPM change -0.7 pp 62% evidence 4.5/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -8.6% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -31.6% · RS bench -13.1% · 1Y -2.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12 + 4.5 + 11 + 6.1 = 33.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29Aviat Networks, Inc.AVNW 33.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 9.6/35 Revenue -0.7% · PAT — · OPM change -7.4 pp 62% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 0.9% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 33.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.9/20 RS sector -30.8% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -1.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 9.6 + 9 + 10.1 + 4.9 = 33.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Silicom Ltd.'s stock price today?

Silicom Ltd. trades at $46.5, +164.0% over the past year. The company is valued at $0.0 B. The stock sits at 96% of its 52-week range of $14–$48, +75.7% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Silicom Ltd.'s latest quarterly results?

Silicom Ltd. reported revenue of $0.0 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. The operating margin was 0.0%, 0.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Silicom Ltd.'s revenue?

Silicom Ltd. reported revenue of $0.0 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.1 B (+0.0%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −17.6% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Silicom Ltd.'s profit?

Silicom Ltd. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $−0.0 B. The operating margin ran 0.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Silicom Ltd.'s market cap?

Silicom Ltd.'s market capitalisation is $0.0 B at a stock price of $46.5. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Silicom Ltd. pay a dividend?

No — Silicom Ltd. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Silicom Ltd. performing?

Silicom Ltd.'s latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 2 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Silicom Ltd. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Silicom Ltd. is currently behind the S&P 500 (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-24), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +201% against the S&P 500's +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Silicom Ltd.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Silicom Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $46.5. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Silicom Ltd. have too much debt?

No — Silicom Ltd.'s debt-to-equity is 0.06. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Silicom Ltd.'s capex?

Silicom Ltd. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Silicom Ltd.'s cash flow?

Silicom Ltd. generated $0.0 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.0 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $−0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Silicom Ltd.'s profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 2 fiscal years, 0% of Silicom Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.0 B against reported profit of $−0.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Silicom Ltd.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 3.21 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That sits well clear of trouble. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Silicom Ltd. in its business cycle?

Silicom Ltd.'s FY25 operating margin was −16.7%, against a 5-year band of −25.0%–13.3%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 0.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Silicom Ltd. story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 0% of the last 2 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Silicom Ltd. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Silicom Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI