Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s price has outrun its earnings. +111.5% in a year against EPS −74.1% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +111.5% in a year while annual EPS moved −74.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (41 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 97th percentile of its own 3-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed — profit +0.0% year on year, and 142% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. trades at $78.0, in a confirmed uptrend and 41 weeks into that stage. That is +27.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 95% of a 52-week range of $37 to $80. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 15 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 41 of stage 2. At $78.0 it trades +27.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 95% of its 52-week range ($37–$80).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.3 years the stock moved +152% while the S&P 500 moved +87% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 15 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. trades at 76.4× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 31.5×, measured across 3.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 76.4× is at the pricey end of its own range (97th percentile), against a long-run median of 31.5× measured over 3.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −74.1% against a +111.5% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +32.9%/yr price move, ~−11.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+44.6 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −64.3% latest against +700.0% at its 12-quarter best). The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −2.1% | +13.1% | — | — |
| Profit | −71.4% | — | — | — |
| EPS | −74.1% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | +111.5% | +32.9% | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
39.6/100 — rank 17 of 27 in Entertainment · 81% evidence confidence
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. scores 39.6 out of 100 against the 27 companies it is compared with in Entertainment, ranking 17. Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 21.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 7.5 + 10.8 + 6.9 + 14.4 = 39.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. reported $0.3 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.2% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 85.1% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.0 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.9 B (−2.1% on the year), capping 4 years at 85.1% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.3 B, +4.2% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +2.4% growth against the decade's 85.1% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +4.1% over the last 4 quarters against +5.3%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −64.3% vs −8.7%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s operating margin is 8.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −4.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −300.0% to 12.9%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 8.0%, −4.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −300.0%–12.9%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −4.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.7 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 4.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, +0.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (−71.4%).
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +4.2% and the margin −4.5 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −43.5% vs revenue +2.4%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 142% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.1 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $0.1 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $0.1 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 142% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Returns on capital ROE is the profit the business earns on the money invested in it — the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
An annual ROE ladder is not held for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp..
We do not hold an annual ROE series for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Its filings carry the return lines we would need as blanks rather than numbers, so this page does not estimate one. The revenue, margin, cash-flow and ownership sections are the reads we stand behind.
Dividend
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Debt-to-equity is 24.73 at the latest reading — carrying real leverage; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.
We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 24.73 — a level of leverage that amplifies both the returns above and the risk. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
3.3% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 3.3% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.0 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.: the Z-score reads 1.48. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.48 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.48.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Cinemark Holdings, Inc.CNK | 62.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 20.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.3 pp 45% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 3.7% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 18.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 15.1% · RS bench 23.3% · 1Y 53.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 12 + 10.8 + 18.3 = 62 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Netflix, Inc.NFLX | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | BASING | 23.2/35 Revenue 16% · PAT 33.2% · OPM change -0.7 pp 95% evidence | 18.3/25 ROCE 9.3% · OPM 33.4% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG 0.64 65% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -36.5% · RS bench -31.6% · 1Y -39.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 18.3 + 15 + 2.8 = 59.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -36.5% and the one-year return is -39.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3The Marcus CorporationMCS | 58.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 45% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM -12.5% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 33× · PEG — 15% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 49.1% · RS bench 59.3% · 1Y 112.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 9.1 + 10.2 + 20 = 58.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Sirius XM Holdings Inc.SIRI | 58.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3 pp 45% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 21.7% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 11.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.6/20 RS sector 7.6% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 43.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 13.6 + 11.2 + 14.6 = 58 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5IMAX CorporationIMAX | 56.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.1 pp 45% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 12.2% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 55.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 17.6% · RS bench 26.1% · 1Y 107%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 12.2 + 9.7 + 18.4 = 56.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Roku, Inc.ROKU | 55.6/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 24.4/35 Revenue 16.8% · PAT — · OPM change 9.8 pp 62% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 4.1% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 71.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 13.2% · RS bench 21.2% · 1Y 77.1%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.4 + 7.7 + 9.3 + 14.2 = 55.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7The Walt Disney CompanyDIS | 50.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 18.6/35 Revenue 3.4% · PAT 30.5% · OPM change -0.3 pp 83% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 14.1% 76% evidence | 16.0/20 P/E 14.8× · PEG 0.53 65% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -23.1% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y -12.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 12.7 + 16 + 3.1 = 50.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Sphere Entertainment Co.SPHR | 50.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 29.9 pp 45% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE -3.1% · OPM 1.9% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 66× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 29.7% · RS bench 38.6% · 1Y 293.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 4.8 + 9.4 + 13.7 = 50.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Warner Music Group Corp.WMG | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.5/35 Revenue 12.6% · PAT 8.4% · OPM change 3.9 pp 83% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 7.0/20 P/E 30× · PEG 2.79 65% evidence | 1.3/20 RS sector -28.2% · RS bench -22.7% · 1Y -18.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.5 + 16 + 7 + 1.3 = 47.8 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -28.2% and the one-year return is -18.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10TKO Group Holdings, Inc.TKO | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 22.3/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 2.5 pp 83% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 21.2% 76% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 75.2× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -15.7% · 1Y 13%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 13.1 + 8.3 + 3.7 = 47.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Fox CorporationFOXA | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 16.4/35 Revenue 0.6% · PAT -7.6% · OPM change 4.5 pp 83% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 12.0/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG 1.61 65% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y 9.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 15.4 + 12 + 3.6 = 47.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Manchester United plcMANU | 46.4/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | LEADER | 17.9/35 Revenue 5.9% · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 62% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 12.2% · 1Y 28.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 6 + 10 + 12.5 = 46.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13AMC Global Media Inc.AMCX | 46.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | LEADER | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.8 pp 45% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 5.8% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 11.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 12.3% · RS bench 20.3% · 1Y 74.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 7.7 + 11.4 + 13.9 = 46.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.LYV | 45.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -13.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM -9.8% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 118.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.9/20 RS sector -2.4% · RS bench 4.6% · 1Y 20%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 11.8 + 8.7 + 11.9 = 45.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Lionsgate Studios Corp.LION | 42.1/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | FADING | 8.9/35 Revenue 1.8% · PAT — · OPM change -12.4 pp 62% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 13% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector 12.7% · RS bench 20.3% · 1Y 105.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.9 + 11.6 + 10 + 11.6 = 42.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16News CorporationNWS | 40.0/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | BASING | 16.8/35 Revenue 4.3% · PAT -4.8% · OPM change 1.2 pp 83% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 9.3% 76% evidence | 5.6/20 P/E 36.1× · PEG 3.87 65% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -9.3% · RS bench -2.5% · 1Y -0.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 10.9 + 5.6 + 6.7 = 40 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.this pageMSGE | 39.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 7.5/35 Revenue 4.5% · PAT -62.9% · OPM change -4.8 pp 83% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM 6.5% 76% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 57.8× · PEG 2.7 65% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 13% · RS bench 21.1% · 1Y 105.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.5 + 10.8 + 6.9 + 14.4 = 39.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 21.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.MSGS | 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 9.6/35 Revenue 1.5% · PAT -675% · OPM change -7.1 pp 62% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 0.5% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 927.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.4/20 RS sector 14.2% · RS bench 22.2% · 1Y 98.2%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 5.7 + 8.5 + 15.4 = 39.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 19Paramount Skydance CorporationPSKY | 36.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.3/35 Revenue 1.1% · PAT — · OPM change 0.8 pp 62% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 8.4% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 31.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.3/20 RS sector -44.7% · RS bench -40.5% · 1Y -20.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 9.6 + 10.3 + 1.3 = 36.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20Reservoir Media, Inc.RSVR | 36.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.4/35 Revenue 10.8% · PAT -12.5% · OPM change -0.4 pp 83% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 24.8% 76% evidence | 4.0/20 P/E 75.3× · PEG 8.29 65% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench 3.9% · 1Y 33.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 10.7 + 4 + 7 = 36.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.WBD | 24.1/100Adverse evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.0/35 Revenue -3% · PAT — · OPM change -27.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE -2.9% · OPM -27.8% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 99.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -5.6% · 1Y 136.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8 + 4.4 + 8.8 + 2.9 = 24.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.AMC | 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional49% evidence | TURNING | 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 12.5 pp 45% evidence | 8.8/25 ROCE 3.8% · OPM -4.4% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.4/20 RS sector 11.3% · RS bench 19.3% · 1Y -8.5%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 8.8 + 10 + 13.4 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.BATRK | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue 6.5% · PAT — · OPM change 10.3 pp 33% evidence | 9.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 12.5% 57% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E -2548.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 4.3% · 1Y 17%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 9.4 + 11.5 + 9.3 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Starz Entertainment Corp.STRZ | 48.1/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | LEADER | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.2 pp 39% evidence | 3.4/25 ROCE -254.9% · OPM -49.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 41.4% · RS bench 50.2% · 1Y 89.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 3.4 + 10 + 16.6 = 48.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Versant Media Group, Inc.VSNT | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence | ASLEEP | 7.3/35 Revenue -4% · PAT -34.7% · OPM change -3 pp 83% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 26.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —2 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.3 + 16.1 + 10 + 10 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Formula One GroupFWONK | 42.3/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BASING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 32% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 44.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -14.2% · RS bench -7.8% · 1Y 0.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 9.6 + 9.9 + 5.5 = 42.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Angel Studios, Inc.ANGX | 38.8/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 22.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 68.5 pp 39% evidence | 3.8/25 ROCE -14.5% · OPM -2.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -46.8% · RS bench -43.1% · 1Y -63.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22 + 3.8 + 10 + 3 = 38.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s stock price today?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. trades at $78.0, +111.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $4.0 B. The stock sits at 95% of its 52-week range of $37–$80, +27.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 41 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s latest quarterly results?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. reported revenue of $0.3 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 4.2% and profit rose 0.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.11. The operating margin was 8.0%, 4.5 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s revenue?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. reported revenue of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.2% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.9 B (−2.1%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 85.1% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s profit?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran 8.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s market cap?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s market capitalisation is $4.0 B at a stock price of $78.0. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s P/E ratio?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. trades at a P/E of 76.4×, at the 97th percentile of its own 3-year range, against a long-run median of 31.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. pay a dividend?
No — Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. overvalued?
On its own history, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 76.4× sits at the 97th percentile of its 3-year range (long-run median 31.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. growing?
The picture is mixed for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.: latest-quarter revenue +4.2% year on year, profit +0.0%, and the margin −4.5 pp at 8.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: mixed — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. performing?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. is in a confirmed uptrend, 41 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 4.2% and profit rose 0.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 15 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. in?
Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −64.3% latest against +700.0% at its 12-quarter best). The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +4.1% latest, profit growth −64.3% latest, eps growth −62.8% latest) plus the ROE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 41 of stage 2), trading +27.3% versus its 200-day average and at 95% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 15 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 3.3 years the stock moved +152% against the S&P 500's +87% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. What it measures instead: the stock price is $78.0, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 41 weeks in. Its P/E of 76.4× sits at the 97th percentile of its own 3-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.?
Somewhat — short interest is 3.3% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s tradable float, about 2.0 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. have too much debt?
It carries real leverage — Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s debt-to-equity is 24.73. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s capex?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s cash flow?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. generated $0.1 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 142% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.1 B against reported profit of $0.0 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.48 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. in its business cycle?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s FY25 operating margin was 12.8%, against a 5-year band of −300.0%–12.9%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 8.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +111.5% in a year while annual EPS moved −74.1% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s price has outrun its earnings. +111.5% in a year against EPS −74.1% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.