Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

LHX
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 27th percentile of its own 4-year range — the business is moving before the market.

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.

The price is building a base (10 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 27th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +30.8% year on year, and 180% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.

Stage
Mixed
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$285
+2.5% 1Y
P/E
28.8×
27th pctile
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Apr 26)
$5.7 B
+11.9% YoY
Profit (Apr 26)
$0.5 B
+30.8% YoY
Operating margin
11.3%
+1.0 pp YoY
ROE
9%
FY26
ROIC
8.1%
vs WACC 6.6% → +1.5 pp
Cash conversion
180%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. trades at $285, building a base and 10 weeks into that stage. That is −9.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 15% of a 52-week range of $271 to $367. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (17 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is building a base — week 10 of stage 1. At $285 it trades −9.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 15% of its 52-week range ($271–$367).

Aug 26: $285 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
−9.7% versus the 200-day line, week 10 of stage 1
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S4S3S2S1S2S1$383$324$265$206$148$$285$316Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Aug 26
S4S3S2S1S2S1$383$324$265$206$148$$285$316Jul 23Jan 25Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (527 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +239% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. trades at 28.8× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 27% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 33.2×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 28.8× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 27% of the time, against a long-run median of 33.2× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 28.8× vs a 33.2× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 4.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 46× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 27% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
47.8×$10.140.6×$7.533.4×$5.026.3×$2.519.1×$0.0×$30.92×$9Apr 22Apr 23May 24Jul 25Aug 26
47.8×$10.140.6×$7.533.4×$5.026.3×$2.519.1×$0.0×$30.92×$9Apr 22May 24Aug 26
PEG 1.36 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 21 quarters.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
5.1×4.0×2.9×1.8×0.7××1.36×Oct 21Dec 22Mar 24Jun 25Jul 26
5.1×4.0×2.9×1.8×0.7××1.36×Oct 21Mar 24Jul 26
P/E
28.8×
27th percentile of 4y
PEG
1.07
as reported

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +9.2% against a +2.5% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +15.2%/yr price move, ~+30.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−14.8 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +47.4% at its peak to +6.8% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 7.0%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +2.5% in FY26, profit +6.6% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
15%31%10%11%4.8%−8.3%−0.4%−28%−5.6%−48%%%2.5%6.6%FY21FY23FY26
15%31%10%11%4.8%−8.3%−0.4%−28%−5.6%−48%%%2.5%6.6%FY21FY23FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
17%59%13%27%9.1%−3.7%5.4%−35%1.6%−66%%%5.8%6.8%9.3%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
17%59%13%27%9.1%−3.7%5.4%−35%1.6%−66%%%5.8%6.8%9.3%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
7.3%6.2%5.1%4.0%2.9%%7%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Apr 26
7.3%6.2%5.1%4.0%2.9%%7%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
Revenue growth
Steady high
latest +5.8% · span +2.6% to +15.7%
Profit growth
Rolling over
latest +6.8% · span −57.4% to +50.0%
EPS growth
Rolling over
latest +9.3% · span −56.7% to +48.8%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 7.0% · span 3.2%–7.0%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+2.5%+4.0%+4.2%
Profit+6.6%+10.3%−2.6%
EPS+9.2%+10.1%−1.1%
Stock price+2.5%+15.2%+4.3%+12.4%
Revenue YoY (Apr 26)
+11.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Apr 26)
+30.8%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
4.2%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

39.7/100 — rank 22 of 30 in Aerospace & Defense · 53% evidence confidence

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. scores 39.7 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defense, ranking 22. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.9 + 10.3 + 8.9 + 2.6 = 39.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported $5.7 B of revenue in the Apr 26 quarter, +11.9% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 5 years it has compounded at 4.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at $21.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $22.5 B.

FY26 revenue came in at $21.9 B (+2.5% on the year), capping 5 years at 4.2% compound. The latest quarter (Apr 26) printed $5.7 B, +11.9% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue $21.9 B (+2.5% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
4.2% a year over 5 years
RevenueYoY growth
2415%1810%124.8%5.9−0.4%0.0−5.6%$ B%$22B2.5%FY21FY23FY26
2415%1810%124.8%5.9−0.4%0.0−5.6%$ B%$22B2.5%FY21FY23FY26
Apr 26: $5.7 B (+11.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
4th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
6.218%4.613%3.17.6%1.52.3%0.0−2.9%$ B%$6B11.9%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
6.218%4.613%3.17.6%1.52.3%0.0−2.9%$ B%$6B11.9%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +6.0% growth against the decade's 4.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +5.8% over the last 4 quarters against +5.6%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +6.8% vs +23.2%/yr — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s operating margin is 11.3% in the Apr 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.6% to 11.8%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 11.3%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.6%–11.8%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.0 pp year on year while gross margin went −1.9 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 9.7% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 6.6–11.8% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
12%2.1%11%0.2%9.2%−1.8%7.7%−3.8%6.2%−5.7%%%9.7%0.7%FY21FY23FY26
12%2.1%11%0.2%9.2%−1.8%7.7%−3.8%6.2%−5.7%%%9.7%0.7%FY21FY23FY26
Apr 26: 11.3% operating margin (+1.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
12%20%10%14%9.3%7.4%8.1%1.3%7.0%−4.8%%%11.3%1%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
12%20%10%14%9.3%7.4%8.1%1.3%7.0%−4.8%%%11.3%1%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. earned $0.5 B of net profit in the Apr 26 quarter, +30.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was $1.6 B. The 5-year compound rate is −2.6%. That is 8.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.4 B.

Apr 26 profit was $0.5 B, +30.8% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed $1.6 B (+6.6%), and the 5-year compound rate is −2.6%.

FY26 profit $1.6 B (+6.6% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−2.6% a year over 5 years
Net profitYoY growth
2.031%1.511%1.0−8.3%0.5−28%0.0−48%$ B%$2B6.6%FY21FY23FY26
2.031%1.511%1.0−8.3%0.5−28%0.0−48%$ B%$2B6.6%FY21FY23FY26
Apr 26: $0.5 B (+30.8% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
0.648%0.417%0.3−15%0.1−46%0.0−78%$ B%$1B30.8%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26
0.648%0.417%0.3−15%0.1−46%0.0−78%$ B%$1B30.8%Jun 23Sep 24Apr 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +11.9% and the margin +1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +8.8% vs revenue +6.0%. Profit and revenue are moving roughly in step.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 180% of L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was $3.1 B of operating cash against $1.6 B of profit. After $0.4 B of capital spending, $2.7 B was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of $3.1 B against reported profit of $1.6 B, leaving free cash of $2.7 B after $0.4 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 180% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO $3.1 B vs profit $1.6 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
180% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
3.42.51.70.80.0$ B$3B$2B$3BFY21FY23FY26
3.42.51.70.80.0$ B$3B$2B$3BFY21FY23FY26
Jul 26: operating cash $0.9 B Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
2.1708%1.5508%0.9309%0.3109%−0.3−91%$ B%$1B−20%Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26
2.1708%1.5508%0.9309%0.3109%−0.3−91%$ B%$1B−20%Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 1.5% of FY26 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY26: capex $0.4 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
0.50.40.20.10.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY26
0.50.40.20.10.0$ B$0BFY21FY23FY26
Jul 26: capex $0.1 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.172.00.131.40.090.80.040.20.00−0.4$ B$ B$0B$1BDec 23Apr 25Jul 26
0.172.00.131.40.090.80.040.20.00−0.4$ B$ B$0B$1BDec 23Apr 25Jul 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. earns a ROE of 8% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 6% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +1.5 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 7.4% net margin on 0.53× asset turns.

FY26 ROE is 8%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 6% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 7.4% net margin × 0.53× asset turns × 2.10× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 8.1% − 6.6% = a +1.5 pp spread. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

FY26: ROE 8% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 6.6% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY22's 6%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
10.0%8.3%6.6%4.9%3.2%%8.2%5.9%FY21FY23FY26
10.0%8.3%6.6%4.9%3.2%%8.2%5.9%FY21FY23FY26
Jul 26: ROIC 6.6% (TTM) vs WACC 6.6% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
9.9%8.8%7.8%6.7%5.6%%6.6%9.6%Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26
9.9%8.8%7.8%6.7%5.6%%6.6%9.6%Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. paid $4.85 per share over the last four reported quarters, up 4.2% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $1.25 for Apr 26. Against the current price of $285 that is a trailing yield of 1.70%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. paid $4.85 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $1.25 for Apr 26. That is up 4.2% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $285 the trailing twelve months work out to 1.70% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.

Dividend per share by quarter Declared dividend per share, $ B, per reported quarter. 12 quarters on file.
latest $1.25 (Apr 26)
Dividend per share
1.41.00.70.30.0$ B$1BJun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Apr 26
1.41.00.70.30.0$ B$1BJun 23Sep 24Apr 26
12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. carries total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $19.9 B as of Jul 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.55. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.41 in FY21 to 0.53 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Jul 26: total debt of $11.0 B against shareholder equity of $19.9 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.55. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.41 (FY21) to 0.53 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

FY26: debt $10.4 B at 0.53× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
140.73×110.63×7.10.54×3.50.45×0.00.35×$ B×$10B0.53×FY21FY23FY26
140.73×110.63×7.10.54×3.50.45×0.00.35×$ B×$10B0.53×FY21FY23FY26
Jul 26: debt $11.0 B, debt-to-equity 0.55 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
150.75×110.69×7.40.63×3.70.57×0.00.51×$ B×$11B0.55×Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26
150.75×110.69×7.40.63×3.70.57×0.00.51×$ B×$11B0.55×Dec 23Apr 25Jul 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

1.7% of L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 1.7% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.0 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
1.7%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
2.0
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.: the Z-score reads 2.51. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.51 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.51.

15 · Related companies · Aerospace & Defense
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1HEICO CorporationHEI 67.7/100Favorable setup81% evidence BREAKING OUT 24.4/35 Revenue 18.8% · PAT 30.2% · OPM change 2.9 pp 83% evidence 15.5/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 25.5% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 48.2× · PEG 1.56 65% evidence 17.3/20 RS sector 5% · RS bench 3.6% · 1Y 17.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 24.4 + 15.5 + 10.5 + 17.3 = 67.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Howmet Aerospace Inc.HWM 65.9/100Favorable setup66% evidence TURNING 22.6/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 38.9% · OPM change 7.2 pp 53% evidence 15.9/25 ROCE 7.5% · OPM 32.6% 57% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 53.5× · PEG 1.32 65% evidence 16.2/20 RS sector 16.2% · RS bench 13.9% · 1Y 59.4%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.6 + 15.9 + 11.2 + 16.2 = 65.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Elbit Systems Ltd.ESLT 59.7/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence TURNING 20.6/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT 66.9% · OPM change 1.5 pp 53% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 9.4% 57% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 68.8× · PEG 1.21 65% evidence 15.2/20 RS sector 16.5% · RS bench 13.3% · 1Y 89%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.6 + 12.3 + 11.6 + 15.2 = 59.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Lockheed Martin CorporationLMT 59.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.8 pp 39% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 6.8% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 18.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 1.2% · RS bench -1.1% · 1Y 38.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 15.2 + 11.1 + 13.4 = 59.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Hexcel CorporationHXL 58.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence FADING 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 39% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 11.5% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 50.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 17.4% · RS bench 15.2% · 1Y 72.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21 + 11.4 + 9.8 + 16.5 = 58.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6RTX CorporationRTX 58.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.6 pp 39% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 33.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.7/20 RS sector 8.6% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 40.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 10.6 + 10.8 + 17.7 = 58.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7GE AerospaceGE 57.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.8/35 Revenue 21.7% · PAT 18.8% · OPM change 0.3 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 18.9% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 43.9× · PEG 2.09 65% evidence 18.5/20 RS sector 10.7% · RS bench 9% · 1Y 37.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 11.8 + 8.6 + 18.5 = 57.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Woodward, Inc.WWD 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 39% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 14.7% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 50.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench 2.1% · 1Y 50.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 15.1 + 9.7 + 11.6 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Leonardo DRS, Inc.DRS 55.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 20.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.7 pp 39% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 35.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector -0.5% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y 9.1%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 12.4 + 10.5 + 11.6 = 55.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10General Dynamics CorporationGD 54.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BREAKING OUT 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.5 pp 39% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 10.5% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 22.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.5/20 RS sector 1.5% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 22.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 13.1 + 11 + 13.5 = 54.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Curtiss-Wright CorporationCW 54.2/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 18.8/35 Revenue 12.2% · PAT 19.1% · OPM change 1.5 pp 53% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 17.5% 57% evidence 7.3/20 P/E 49.9× · PEG 2.33 65% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 9.1% · RS bench 6.8% · 1Y 60.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.8 + 14.1 + 7.3 + 14 = 54.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Embraer S.A.EMBJ 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence TURNING 16.3/35 Revenue 20% · PAT -22.2% · OPM change 1 pp 53% evidence 7.9/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 5.6% 57% evidence 14.3/20 P/E 54.9× · PEG 0.51 65% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector 1.9% · RS bench 0.2% · 1Y 20.8%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 7.9 + 14.3 + 14.5 = 53 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 0.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
13StandardAero, Inc.SARO 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 18.3/35 Revenue 15% · PAT 100% · OPM change -0.2 pp 53% evidence 9.5/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 8.8% 57% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 29.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 11.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 9.5 + 10.9 + 13.7 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14Axon Enterprise, Inc.AXON 48.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.3/35 Revenue 34% · PAT -37.8% · OPM change 5.1 pp 53% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 3.6% 57% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 170.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.0/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench -2.1% · 1Y -27.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.3 + 8.1 + 8.6 + 12 = 48 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15TransDigm Group IncorporatedTDG 44.8/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence TURNING 16.2/35 Revenue 13.3% · PAT 9.6% · OPM change 0.2 pp 53% evidence 15.6/25 ROCE 5.5% · OPM 46.3% 57% evidence 5.7/20 P/E 35.6× · PEG 4.36 65% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -11.3% · 1Y -8.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.2 + 15.6 + 5.7 + 7.3 = 44.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Northrop Grumman CorporationNOC 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.9 pp 39% evidence 11.2/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 10% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.7/20 RS sector -16.6% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -5.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.4 + 11.2 + 11.5 + 4.7 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.HII 42.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 39% evidence 9.5/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 5% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 16.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.1/20 RS sector -11.3% · RS bench -13.5% · 1Y 22.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 9.5 + 11.4 + 5.1 = 42.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
18CAE Inc.CAE 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence BASING 10.5/35 Revenue 4.4% · PAT -22.4% · OPM change -7.6 pp 53% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 12.9% 57% evidence 14.8/20 P/E 37.3× · PEG 0.68 65% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -11.8% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y -6.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.5 + 10.8 + 14.8 + 6.2 = 42.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
19Textron Inc.TXT 41.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.8 pp 39% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 6.3% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 17.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.2/20 RS sector -7.9% · RS bench -9.5% · 1Y 15.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 9.4 + 11.3 + 5.2 = 41.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20The Boeing CompanyBA 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 39% evidence 4.6/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 2% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 93.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -1.6% · RS bench -3.1% · 1Y 3.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 4.6 + 9 + 9.9 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21FTAI Aviation Ltd.FTAI 39.8/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 12.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.6 pp 39% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 58.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench -7.9% · 1Y 63.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 14.3 + 9.2 + 3.8 = 39.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
22L3Harris Technologies, Inc.this pageLHX 39.7/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence BASING 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 32% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 11.4% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 96× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.6/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y 5.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 10.3 + 8.9 + 2.6 = 39.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23AeroVironment, Inc.AVAV 37.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence BASING 17.6/35 Revenue 100% · PAT -702.3% · OPM change 3.9 pp 83% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 97.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -36.8% · RS bench -37.6% · 1Y -31.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 6.4 + 8.7 + 4.6 = 37.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
24BWX Technologies, Inc.BWXT 34.2/100Adverse evidence66% evidence BASING 16.3/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT 19% · OPM change -1.8 pp 53% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 9.9% 57% evidence 5.3/20 P/E 54.7× · PEG 2.86 65% evidence 1.2/20 RS sector -18% · RS bench -19.5% · 1Y -3.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 11.4 + 5.3 + 1.2 = 34.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.KTOS 33.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BASING 18.0/35 Revenue 21.9% · PAT 50% · OPM change -0.9 pp 53% evidence 6.6/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 1.3% 57% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 423.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.8/20 RS sector -36.5% · RS bench -37.9% · 1Y -18.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 6.6 + 8.5 + 0.8 = 33.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Planet Labs PBCPL 30.2/100Adverse evidence61% evidence ASLEEP 13.8/35 Revenue 34% · PAT — · OPM change -2.7 pp 62% evidence 3.4/25 ROCE -4.8% · OPM -37.1% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -6.5% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y 256.7%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.8 + 3.4 + 10 + 3 = 30.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Honeywell Aerospace Inc.HONA 55.0/100Thin evidence · provisional18% evidence 17.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.3 pp 10% evidence 17.3/25 ROCE 14.4% · OPM 20.2% 57% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.7 + 17.3 + 10 + 10 = 55 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Moog Inc.MOG-B 54.0/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence BREAKING OUT 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1 pp 32% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 4.4% · OPM 10.8% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 36.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y 101.5%8 of 11 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 14 + 10.4 + 10 = 54 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Rocket Lab CorporationRKLB 42.4/100Thin evidence · provisional48% evidence FADING 22.4/35 Revenue 45.7% · PAT — · OPM change 20.4 pp 40% evidence 6.0/25 ROCE -3.4% · OPM -27.9% 57% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.0/20 RS sector -5.1% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y 66.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.4 + 6 + 10 + 4 = 42.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
30Space Exploration Technologies Corp.SPCX 41.7/100Thin evidence · provisional18% evidence 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -42.1 pp 10% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE -5% · OPM -41.4% 57% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 16.3 + 5.4 + 10 + 10 = 41.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s stock price today?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. trades at $285, +2.5% over the past year. The company is valued at $53.0 B. The stock sits at 15% of its 52-week range of $271–$367, −9.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 10 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported revenue of $5.7 B and net profit of $0.5 B for the Apr 26 quarter. Revenue rose 11.9% and profit rose 30.8% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.72. The operating margin was 11.3%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s revenue?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported revenue of $5.7 B in the Apr 26 quarter, +11.9% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was $21.9 B (+2.5%). Over the last 5 years revenue compounded at 4.2% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s profit?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. earned $0.5 B of net profit in the Apr 26 quarter, +30.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was $1.6 B. The operating margin ran 11.3% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s market cap?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $53.0 B at a stock price of $285. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. trades at a P/E of 28.8×, at the 27th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 33.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.

Does L3Harris Technologies, Inc. pay a dividend?

Yes — L3Harris Technologies, Inc. declared $1.25 per share for Apr 26, and $4.85 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is up 4.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s dividend per share?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s most recently declared dividend is $1.25 per share for Apr 26, giving $4.85 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s dividend yield?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s trailing dividend yield is 1.70%: $4.85 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $285. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. overvalued?

On its own history, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 28.8× has been cheaper only 27% of the time in 4 years (long-run median 33.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. growing?

Yes — L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +11.9% year on year, profit +30.8%, and the margin +1.0 pp at 11.3%. The 5-year compound rates are 4.2% (revenue) and −2.6% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.

How is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. performing?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is building a base, 10 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 11.9% and profit rose 30.8% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 17 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. in?

Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: profit growth has eased from +47.4% at its peak to +6.8% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 7.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +5.8% latest, profit growth +6.8% latest, eps growth +9.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. in an uptrend?

No — the price is building a base (week 10 of stage 1), trading −9.7% versus its 200-day average and at 15% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is currently behind the S&P 500 (17 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-04-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +239% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $285, the price is building a base 10 weeks in. Its P/E of 28.8× sits at the 27th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is the market betting against L3Harris Technologies, Inc.?

No — short interest is 1.7% of L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s tradable float, about 2.0 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.

Does L3Harris Technologies, Inc. have too much debt?

It is moderate — L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s debt-to-equity is 0.53. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s capex?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was $0.4 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s cash flow?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. generated $3.1 B of operating cash flow in FY26 and $2.7 B of free cash flow after $0.4 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $1.6 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 180% of L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was $3.1 B against reported profit of $1.6 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is L3Harris Technologies, Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.51 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. in its business cycle?

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s FY26 operating margin was 9.7%, against a 5-year band of 6.6%–11.8%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 11.3%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the L3Harris Technologies, Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is coiled. The quarters are improving, yet the P/E sits at the 27th percentile of its own 4-year range — the business is moving before the market. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI