DigitalBridge Group share price

DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s share price was $16.00 at the close on 29 September 2026. It has been rising for 36 weeks. That is 3.0% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $9 and $16, and at that close it was at the high of that range.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today DigitalBridge Group, Inc. is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 5 weeks running.

Over the last 9.7 years the share price moved −73% while the S&P 500 moved +239%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 28 August 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc. declared ₹0.01 per local share for Jun 2026, and ₹0.04 over the last four reported quarters. It reports in its home currency, and one US-listed share can stand for several local shares, so we do not set this against the dollar price or show a yield.

DigitalBridge Group is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc. earned ₹0.2 B of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter. The full FY25 year was a loss of ₹0.03 B. That is 46.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.03 B. 6 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was ₹0.0 B (−118.4% on the year before).

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc. reported ₹0.5 B of income in the Jun 2026 quarter. Over 4 years it has grown −29.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹0.1 B. The last four reported quarters add to ₹0.6 B.

For a bank, revenue is everything it earns: interest on its loans plus fees from its businesses.

FY25 revenue was ₹0.1 B, −84.5% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew −21.2% on average, against −29.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +242.8%, against −16.8% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +3,355.4%, against −11.9% a year (accelerating).

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s net margin was 46.6% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 754.3 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between −216.3% and 24.2%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Net margin is what the bank keeps from every $100 of revenue after every cost, provision for bad loans and tax. With big fee businesses in the mix, it is the clearest margin we can read for this bank.

Why: the net margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc. does not report loan-quality figures this page can read, so this section says so rather than guess. No bad-loan figures are filed in a form this page can read, and none are guessed from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections carry what this business does report.

Gross NPA is the share of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside for those loans. Falling is good; rising is a warning.

Why: loan quality drives a lender, but its details (new bad loans, recoveries, money set aside) are not in our data for this company. The sections around this one carry what we can back up.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s revenue was ₹0.1 B in FY25, −84.5% on the year before, so the loan book is not growing. The net margin on that income is 46.6%, −754.3 percentage points on a year ago. Interest income stands in for the size of the loan book; changes in interest rates can move it a few points in any year.

We read the loan book through revenue: when the book and the businesses grow, revenue grows with them. It is only a rough guide, because interest-rate changes and fee swings can move it a few points in any year.

In short: a lender grows well when its loan book grows, its margin stays steady and its loans stay clean. Quarterly loan-quality figures are missing here, so revenue growth and margin are the two we watch.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s P/BV is 1.9×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

For a bank or lender we compare the price with book value, the net worth on its balance sheet. P/BV is how many rupees the market pays for each $1 of that net worth. Below 1× means the market values it at less than its net worth.

Why the multiple is low: this lender earns about 10% a year on its equity. A lender that earns less on its net worth is valued lower for each rupee of it, and that gap usually closes only if returns improve.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the book value trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 12 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

DigitalBridge Group, Inc. earned a return on equity of −1% in FY25. Its lowest yearly reading on file was −16% in FY21. On its assets, every ₹100 earned about ₹3.89, before the effect of borrowing. For a lender the balance sheet is the business, so the return on equity and on assets have to be read together.

Two numbers rate a bank: ROE, what it earns on shareholders’ money, and ROA, what it earns on all its assets. An ROE above about 13 to 15% is healthy; below that, net worth grows slowly.

That return is below the level a bank needs to grow its net worth quickly, which helps explain why its multiple is where it is.

Why: the ROE chart shows the move, but the deposit-cost and bad-loan details behind it are not in our data.

For a bank, borrowing is the raw material of the business, not a warning sign: it borrows money in order to lend it out. Its safety is read through its returns and its loans. Its safety is read from the bad-loan figures and the return on equity instead.

For a manufacturer, debt is a claim on its profits. For a lender it is the stock it trades in, so the usual debt-to-equity test would mislead and is not used here.

9.5% of DigitalBridge Group, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 3.6 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For DigitalBridge Group, Inc., the Z-score is not used, because it was built for manufacturers, not lenders. For a lender, safety is read from its capital and bad-loan figures instead.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

There is no score against its industry: DigitalBridge Group, Inc. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Asset Management.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

DigitalBridge Group is the 42nd largest of 90 Asset Management companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Acadian Asset Management Inc., FS KKR Capital Corp. and Hercules Capital, Inc. Just below it: WisdomTree, Inc., Sprott Inc. and GCM Grosvenor Inc.

Asset Management companies close in size

39. Acadian Asset Management Inc. $3.3 billion
40. FS KKR Capital Corp. $3.2 billion
41. Hercules Capital, Inc. $3.1 billion
42. DigitalBridge Group, Inc. $3 billion
43. WisdomTree, Inc. $3 billion
44. Sprott Inc. $2.9 billion
45. GCM Grosvenor Inc. $2.6 billion

All 90 Asset Management companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1725. The Marzetti Company $3.1 billion · Packaged Foods
1726. AXT, Inc. $3.1 billion · Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
1727. DigitalBridge Group, Inc. $3 billion
1728. Standex International Corporation $3 billion · Specialty Industrial Machinery
1729. CBIZ, Inc. $3 billion · Specialty Business Services

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 29 September 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.