ASML Holding N.V. share price today

ASML Holding N.V.'s share price was $1,424 at the close on 6 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 3 weeks. That is 11.0% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $967 and $1,930, and at that close it sat 48% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today ASML Holding N.V. is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 5 weeks running.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved +1,365% while the S&P 500 moved +246%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 2 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

ASML Holding N.V. declared EUR 1.88 per local share for Jun 2026, and EUR 12.86 over the last four reported quarters. It reports in euros, and one US-listed share can stand for several local shares, so we do not set this against the dollar price or show a yield.

ASML Holding N.V. is on 2 of our US lists: Nasdaq 100 companies and US tech stocks.

ASML Holding N.V. earned EUR 5.0 B of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +133.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 9th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY25 profit was EUR 9.6 B. Over 4 years profit has grown 13.1% a year on average. That is 42.5% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned EUR 2.1 B.

For the full year, FY25 profit was EUR 9.6 B (+26.9% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +55.2% on a year earlier and the margin moved +11.6 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +45.9% and revenue +23.7%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra dollar of revenue adds more to profit.

This company reports in euros, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (EUR); nothing is converted.

ASML Holding N.V. reported EUR 11.7 B of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +55.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 9th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 15.1% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at EUR 32.7 B.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to EUR 39.5 B.

FY25 revenue was EUR 32.7 B, +15.6% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +23.7% on average, against 15.1% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +22.5%, against +22.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +42.4%, against +39.5% a year (stabilising).

This company reports in euros, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (EUR); nothing is converted.

ASML Holding N.V.'s operating margin was 44.4% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 11.6 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 30.7% and 35.1%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every EUR 100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +11.6 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +5.8 points. So the gain came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 117% of ASML Holding N.V.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in EUR 12.7 B of operating cash against EUR 9.6 B of profit. After EUR 1.6 B of spending on assets, EUR 11.1 B was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

This company reports in euros, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (EUR); nothing is converted.

ASML Holding N.V. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent EUR 5.8 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 5.9% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: EUR 5.8 B over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

This company reports in euros, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (EUR); nothing is converted.

ASML Holding N.V.'s P/E is 36.6×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

ASML Holding N.V.'s business is getting better. Profit growth hit its low 8 quarters ago at −9.0% and has recovered to +42.4%, with ROCE rising at 50.8%. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a lasting rise from a low is what this page is built to show.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

ASML Holding N.V. earned a ROE of 49% in FY25. That is up from a low of 41% in FY24. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 80.6 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 29.4% net margin and 0.65× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 29.4% net margin × 0.65× asset turnover × 2.58× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 49.3% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 92.1% − 11.5% = +80.6 percentage points. The 11.5% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value.

The 92.1% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 85.8%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

ASML Holding N.V. has total debt of EUR 2.0 B against shareholder equity of EUR 22.1 B as of Sep 2026, so its debt is 0.09× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.47 in FY21 to 0.24 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

This company reports in euros, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (EUR); nothing is converted.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for ASML Holding N.V., so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 0.9 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For ASML Holding N.V., the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

74.9 out of 100, rank 1 of 29 in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, with 85% of the evidence available.

ASML Holding N.V. scores 74.9 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, ranking 1. Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 24.1 + 21 + 13.3 + 16.5 = 74.9. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

ASML Holding N.V. ranks 1 of 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 74.9 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, all 29 compared on one page.

ASML Holding N.V. is the largest of 26 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 6 November 2026). It is the largest. Just below it: Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, KLA Corporation, Teradyne, Inc., Qnity Electronics, Inc. and Entegris, Inc.

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies close in size

1. ASML Holding N.V. $574.5 billion
2. Applied Materials, Inc. $264.1 billion
3. Lam Research Corporation $250.2 billion
4. KLA Corporation $179.8 billion
5. Teradyne, Inc. $34 billion
6. Qnity Electronics, Inc. $24.4 billion
7. Entegris, Inc. $19.6 billion

All 26 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

17. ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation $676.8 billion · Oil & Gas Integrated
18. Johnson & Johnson $665 billion · Drug Manufacturers - General
19. ASML Holding N.V. $574.5 billion
20. Mastercard Incorporated $568.5 billion · Credit Services
21. AbbVie Inc. $515.2 billion · Drug Manufacturers - General

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 6 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.