Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-17
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17

AbbVie Inc.

ABBV
Healthcare · Drug Manufacturers - General

AbbVie Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 68th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (13 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 68th percentile of its own 5-year range. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Stage
Mixed
partial read
Price
$263
+18.0% 1Y
P/E
74.3×
68th pctile
of its own 5-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
$17.0 B
+10.2% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
$3.6 B
+287.1% YoY
Operating margin
40.0%
+2.5 pp YoY
ROIC
17.7%
vs WACC 5.4% → +12.3 pp
Cash conversion
458%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

AbbVie Inc. trades at $263, in a confirmed uptrend and 13 weeks into that stage. That is +14.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 96% of a 52-week range of $199 to $265. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 13 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 13 of stage 2. At $263 it trades +14.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 96% of its 52-week range ($199–$265).

Sep 26: $263 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+14.5% versus the 200-day line, week 13 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S3S2S2S1S2$275$238$202$165$128$$263$229Sep 23Jun 24Mar 25Dec 25Sep 26
S3S2S2S1S2$275$238$202$165$128$$263$229Sep 23Mar 25Sep 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (533 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 16Sep 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +309% while the S&P 500 moved +255% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 13 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

AbbVie Inc. trades at 74.3× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 61.7×, measured across 4.5 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 74.3× is mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile), against a long-run median of 61.7× measured over 4.5 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 74.3× vs a 61.7× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 4.5-year window; loss-period spikes above 174× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (68th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
186.6×$8.1141.3×$6.196.0×$4.050.7×$2.05.4×$0.0×$74.24×$4Apr 22May 23Jun 24Aug 25Sep 26
186.6×$8.1141.3×$6.196.0×$4.050.7×$2.05.4×$0.0×$74.24×$4Apr 22Jun 24Sep 26
PEG 1.32 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 20 quarters; values above 6 pinned at the top.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
6.4×4.9×3.4×1.9×0.4××1.32×Sep 21Sep 22Dec 23Mar 25Jun 26
6.4×4.9×3.4×1.9×0.4××1.32×Sep 21Dec 23Jun 26
P/E
74.3×
68th percentile of 5y
PEG
1.28
as reported

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −1.3% against a +18.0% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +19.9%/yr price move, ~−10.1%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+30.0 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

AbbVie Inc. reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 12 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +8.6% in FY25, profit −1.2% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
9.8%7.8%5.4%−10%1.1%−28%−3.3%−46%−7.6%−64%%%8.6%−1.2%FY21FY23FY25
9.8%7.8%5.4%−10%1.1%−28%−3.3%−46%−7.6%−64%%%8.6%−1.2%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue stabilising, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
12%79%6.9%42%2.0%4.8%−2.9%−32%−7.7%−69%%%10.4%68.4%68.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
12%79%6.9%42%2.0%4.8%−2.9%−32%−7.7%−69%%%10.4%68.4%68.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Flat
latest +10.4% · span −6.4% to +10.4%
Profit growth
Flat
latest +68.4% · span −59.0% to +68.4%
EPS growth
Flat
latest +68.5% · span −58.8% to +68.5%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+8.6%+1.8%
Profit−1.2%−29.1%
EPS−1.3%−29.1%
Stock price+18.0%+19.9%+19.5%+15.3%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+10.2%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+287.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
2.1%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

75.2/100 — rank 1 of 16 in Drug Manufacturers - General · 75% evidence confidence

AbbVie Inc. scores 75.2 out of 100 against the 16 companies it is compared with in Drug Manufacturers - General, ranking 1. Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 28.8 + 20.1 + 8.7 + 17.6 = 75.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

AbbVie Inc. reported $17.0 B of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +10.2% year on year. That is the 10th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 2.1% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $61.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $64.4 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $61.2 B (+8.6% on the year), capping 4 years at 2.1% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed $17.0 B, +10.2% year on year — the 10th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY25 revenue $61.2 B (+8.6% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
2.1% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
669.8%505.4%331.1%17−3.3%0.0−7.6%$ B%$61B8.6%FY21FY23FY25
669.8%505.4%331.1%17−3.3%0.0−7.6%$ B%$61B8.6%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: $17.0 B (+10.2% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
10th straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
1814%148.6%9.23.3%4.6−2.1%0.0−7.4%$ B%$17B10.2%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
1814%148.6%9.23.3%4.6−2.1%0.0−7.4%$ B%$17B10.2%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +10.4% growth against the decade's 2.1% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +10.4% over the last 4 quarters against +8.2%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +68.4% vs +8.9%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

AbbVie Inc.'s operating margin is 40.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +2.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 30.9% to 35.2%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 40.0%, +2.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 30.9%–35.2%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +2.5 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.8 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY25: 34.5% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 30.9–35.2% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
36%4.1%34%2.3%33%0.5%32%−1.3%31%−3.1%%%34.5%3.6%FY21FY23FY25
36%4.1%34%2.3%33%0.5%32%−1.3%31%−3.1%%%34.5%3.6%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: 40.0% operating margin (+2.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
41%8.2%37%3.6%34%−1.1%30%−5.7%27%−10%%%40%2.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
41%8.2%37%3.6%34%−1.1%30%−5.7%27%−10%%%40%2.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

AbbVie Inc. earned $3.6 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +287.1% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $4.2 B. The 4-year compound rate is −22.3%. That is 21.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.9 B. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Jun 26 profit was $3.6 B, +287.1% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $4.2 B (−1.2%), and the 4-year compound rate is −22.3%.

FY25 profit $4.2 B (−1.2% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−22.3% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
137.6%9.5−10%6.4−28%3.2−46%0.0−64%$ B%$4B−1.2%FY21FY23FY25
137.6%9.5−10%6.4−28%3.2−46%0.0−64%$ B%$4B−1.2%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: $3.6 B (+287.1% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
3.9539%2.8366%1.8194%0.721%−0.3−151%$ B%$4B287.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
3.9539%2.8366%1.8194%0.721%−0.3−151%$ B%$4B287.1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +10.2% and the margin +2.5 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +50.9% vs revenue +10.4%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 458% of AbbVie Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $19.0 B of operating cash against $4.2 B of profit. After $1.2 B of capital spending, $17.8 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $19.0 B against reported profit of $4.2 B, leaving free cash of $17.8 B after $1.2 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 458% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $19.0 B vs profit $4.2 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
458% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
2720136.70.0$ B$19B$4B$18BFY21FY23FY25
2720136.70.0$ B$19B$4B$18BFY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: operating cash $3.4 B = 96% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
8.24,204%6.13,101%4.11,998%2.0895%0.0−208%$ B%$3B96%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
8.24,204%6.13,101%4.11,998%2.0895%0.0−208%$ B%$3B96%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

AbbVie Inc. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $3.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 1.6% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $3.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $1.2 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
1.31.00.70.30.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
1.31.00.70.30.0$ B$1BFY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: capex $0.3 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)Free cash
0.47.80.36.10.24.40.12.70.00.9$ B$ B$0B$3BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26
0.47.80.36.10.24.40.12.70.00.9$ B$ B$0B$3BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

AbbVie Inc. earns a ROE of −130% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +12.3 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 6.9% net margin on 0.46× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is −130%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 6.9% net margin × 0.46× asset turns × −41.47× balance-sheet leverage ≈ −131.6% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 17.7% − 5.4% = a +12.3 pp spread. The 5.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.

FY25: ROE −130% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 5.4% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
147%72%0.0%−76%−150%%−129.7%17.3%FY21FY23FY25
147%72%0.0%−76%−150%%−129.7%17.3%FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: ROIC 13.5% (TTM) vs WACC 5.4% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
947%694%441%189%−64%%13.5%877.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
947%694%441%189%−64%%13.5%877.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
11 · Dividend

Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.

AbbVie Inc. paid $6.83 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $1.73 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $263 that is a trailing yield of 2.60%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.

AbbVie Inc. paid $6.83 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $1.73 for Jun 26. Against the current price of $263 the trailing twelve months work out to 2.60% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.

Dividend per share by quarter Declared dividend per share, $ B, per reported quarter. 12 quarters on file.
latest $1.73 (Jun 26)
Dividend per share
1.91.40.90.50.0$ B$2BSep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
1.91.40.90.50.0$ B$2BSep 23Dec 24Jun 26
12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

AbbVie Inc.'s net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 5.03 in FY21 to −21.18 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Jun 26: total debt of $70.9 B against shareholder equity of $−5.9 B — a debt-to-equity of −12.04. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 5.03 (FY21) to −21.18 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY25: debt $68.4 B at −21.18× equity Total debt by fiscal year, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
8423.6×6311.6×420.0×21−12.5×0.0−24.5×$ B×$68B−21.18×FY21FY23FY25
8423.6×6311.6×420.0×21−12.5×0.0−24.5×$ B×$68B−21.18×FY21FY23FY25
Jun 26: debt $70.9 B, debt-to-equity −12.04 Total debt per quarter, $ B (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
8092.1×60−68.0×40−228.1×20−388.2×0.0−548.3×$ B×$71B−12.04×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
8092.1×60−68.0×40−228.1×20−388.2×0.0−548.3×$ B×$71B−12.04×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

1.1% of AbbVie Inc.'s tradable float is currently sold short — the crowd is not positioned against this stock. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

The latest reading: 1.1% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 4.0 days to buy those positions back. The crowd is not positioned against this stock. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.

Short interest
1.1%
of the tradable float
Days to cover
4.0
at typical volumes

Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

AbbVie Inc.: the Z-score reads 2.42. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.42 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.42.

15 · Related companies · Drug Manufacturers - General
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1AbbVie Inc.this pageABBV 75.2/100Favorable setup75% evidence LEADER 28.8/35 Revenue 10.4% · PAT 68.4% · OPM change 2.5 pp 95% evidence 20.1/25 ROCE 24.5% · OPM 40% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 70.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.6/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y 18%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.8 + 20.1 + 8.7 + 17.6 = 75.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyBMY 69.4/100Favorable setup85% evidence BREAKING OUT 26.0/35 Revenue 3.1% · PAT 83.1% · OPM change 12.5 pp 95% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 31% 76% evidence 14.8/20 P/E 12.7× · PEG 0.51 65% evidence 16.1/20 RS sector 5.4% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 41.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26 + 12.5 + 14.8 + 16.1 = 69.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
3Eli Lilly and CompanyLLY 67.1/100Favorable setup85% evidence FADING 32.3/35 Revenue 49.6% · PAT 93.6% · OPM change 9.1 pp 95% evidence 21.3/25 ROCE 41.7% · OPM 54.2% 76% evidence 3.9/20 P/E 40× · PEG 8.59 65% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 3.2% · 1Y 51.3%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 32.3 + 21.3 + 3.9 + 9.6 = 67.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
4Amgen Inc.AMGN 67.0/100Favorable setup85% evidence BREAKING OUT 26.5/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT 32.1% · OPM change 2.9 pp 95% evidence 16.9/25 ROCE 18.2% · OPM 35.5% 76% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 22.4× · PEG 0.71 65% evidence 10.5/20 RS sector 0.3% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 31.9%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26.5 + 16.9 + 13.1 + 10.5 = 67 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Johnson & JohnsonJNJ 65.5/100Favorable setup75% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.1/35 Revenue 8.1% · PAT -7.2% · OPM change 0.9 pp 95% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 18.6% · OPM 29.2% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 29.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.1/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y 51.7%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.1 + 16.8 + 9.5 + 17.1 = 65.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Gilead Sciences, Inc.GILD 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence BREAKING OUT 14.9/35 Revenue 5.5% · PAT -151.3% · OPM change -5.5 pp 95% evidence 19.1/25 ROCE 30.9% · OPM 33.7% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 18.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.4/20 RS sector 4.1% · RS bench 4.4% · 1Y 29.4%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.9 + 19.1 + 10.5 + 15.4 = 59.9 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 4.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7Organon & Co.OGN 54.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 12.1/35 Revenue -2.1% · PAT -67.2% · OPM change 0.7 pp 83% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 16.1% 76% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 6.4× · PEG 0.17 65% evidence 14.6/20 RS sector 25.7% · RS bench 26.7% · 1Y 30.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 10.8 + 16.5 + 14.6 = 54 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 26.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
8Merck & Co., Inc.MRK 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence BREAKING OUT 4.5/35 Revenue 4.6% · PAT -80.7% · OPM change -37.7 pp 95% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 18.3% · OPM -0.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 14.3× · PEG 1.75 65% evidence 19.1/20 RS sector 18.2% · RS bench 18.5% · 1Y 77.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 4.5 + 12.3 + 9.6 + 19.1 = 45.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 18.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
9AstraZeneca PLCAZN 44.7/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence BASING 18.5/35 Revenue 8.6% · PAT 25.9% · OPM change -0.8 pp 95% evidence 14.4/25 ROCE 17.7% · OPM 23.5% 76% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 27.8× · PEG 1.08 65% evidence 0.9/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench -15.6% · 1Y 5.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.5 + 14.4 + 10.9 + 0.9 = 44.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10GSK plcGSK 43.6/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 15.3/35 Revenue 5% · PAT 32.1% · OPM change -19.6 pp 95% evidence 9.4/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 5.7% 76% evidence 14.8/20 P/E 16.8× · PEG 0.4 65% evidence 4.1/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench -7.7% · 1Y 23.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 9.4 + 14.8 + 4.1 = 43.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11Novartis AGNVS 41.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 12.5/35 Revenue 2.7% · PAT -6.5% · OPM change 0.8 pp 95% evidence 19.3/25 ROCE 19.6% · OPM 34.6% 76% evidence 7.0/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG 2.3 65% evidence 2.4/20 RS sector -11.4% · RS bench -11.1% · 1Y 12.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 19.3 + 7 + 2.4 = 41.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
12Biogen Inc.BIIB 40.2/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence LEADER 6.3/35 Revenue 0.3% · PAT -45.4% · OPM change -24.9 pp 95% evidence 6.1/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 5.6% 76% evidence 13.7/20 P/E 38.2× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence 14.1/20 RS sector 8.4% · RS bench 8.9% · 1Y 51.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 6.3 + 6.1 + 13.7 + 14.1 = 40.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 8.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
13Grifols, S.A.GRFS 40.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.3 pp 45% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 14.8% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 7.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.6/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench -18% · 1Y -24%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.1 + 8.1 + 11.3 + 4.6 = 40.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
14SanofiSNY 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence ASLEEP 12.5/35 Revenue 7% · PAT -32.6% · OPM change -5.2 pp 95% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 8.5% 76% evidence 13.1/20 P/E 22.9× · PEG 0.58 65% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -14.8% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y -10.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.5 + 7.7 + 13.1 + 5 = 38.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
15Amarin Corporation plcAMRN 33.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 17.9/35 Revenue 1.9% · PAT — · OPM change 14.8 pp 62% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -25.1% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 168.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.2/20 RS sector -15.4% · RS bench -14.8% · 1Y -9.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.9 + 3 + 8.5 + 4.2 = 33.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
16Pfizer Inc.PFE 30.0/100Adverse evidence75% evidence BREAKING OUT 5.6/35 Revenue -0.2% · PAT -59.4% · OPM change -25.1 pp 95% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -4.3% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -1.9% · RS bench -1.4% · 1Y 14.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 5.6 + 5 + 9.3 + 10.1 = 30 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is AbbVie Inc.'s stock price today?

AbbVie Inc. trades at $263, +18.0% over the past year. The company is valued at $464 B. The stock sits at 96% of its 52-week range of $199–$265, +14.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. — as of 17 September 2026.

What were AbbVie Inc.'s latest quarterly results?

AbbVie Inc. reported revenue of $17.0 B and net profit of $3.6 B for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 10.2% and profit rose 287.1% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.03. The operating margin was 40.0%, 2.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s revenue?

AbbVie Inc. reported revenue of $17.0 B in the Jun 26 quarter, +10.2% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $61.2 B (+8.6%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 2.1% a year. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s profit?

AbbVie Inc. earned $3.6 B of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +287.1% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $4.2 B. The operating margin ran 40.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s market cap?

AbbVie Inc.'s market capitalisation is $464 B at a stock price of $263. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s P/E ratio?

AbbVie Inc. trades at a P/E of 74.3×, at the 68th percentile of its own 5-year range, against a long-run median of 61.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 17 September 2026.

Does AbbVie Inc. pay a dividend?

Yes — AbbVie Inc. declared $1.73 per share for Jun 26, and $6.83 per share across the last four reported quarters. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s dividend per share?

AbbVie Inc.'s most recently declared dividend is $1.73 per share for Jun 26, giving $6.83 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s dividend yield?

AbbVie Inc.'s trailing dividend yield is 2.60%: $6.83 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $263. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc. overvalued?

On its own history, AbbVie Inc. looks expensive: its P/E of 74.3× sits at the 68th percentile of its 5-year range (long-run median 61.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc. growing?

Yes — AbbVie Inc. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +10.2% year on year, profit +287.1%, and the margin +2.5 pp at 40.0%. The 4-year compound rates are 2.1% (revenue) and −22.3% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 17 September 2026.

How is AbbVie Inc. performing?

AbbVie Inc. is in a confirmed uptrend, 13 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 10.2% and profit rose 287.1% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 13 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 17 September 2026.

What stage is AbbVie Inc. in?

Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +10.4% latest, profit growth +68.4% latest, eps growth +68.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc. in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 13 of stage 2), trading +14.5% versus its 200-day average and at 96% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc. beating the market?

On recent form, yes — AbbVie Inc. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 13 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved +309% against the S&P 500's +255% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 17 September 2026.

Will AbbVie Inc.'s stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for AbbVie Inc. What it measures instead: the stock price is $263, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 13 weeks in. Its P/E of 74.3× sits at the 68th percentile of its own 5-year range. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is the market betting against AbbVie Inc.?

No — short interest is 1.1% of AbbVie Inc.'s tradable float, about 4.0 days to cover at typical volumes. That is a low reading: the crowd is not positioned against this stock. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s capex?

AbbVie Inc. spent $3.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $1.2 B. — as of 17 September 2026.

What is AbbVie Inc.'s cash flow?

AbbVie Inc. generated $19.0 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $17.8 B of free cash flow after $1.2 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $4.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc.'s profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 458% of AbbVie Inc.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $19.0 B against reported profit of $4.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 17 September 2026.

How financially safe is AbbVie Inc.?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.42 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 17 September 2026.

Where is AbbVie Inc. in its business cycle?

AbbVie Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 34.5%, against a 5-year band of 30.9%–35.2%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 40.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 17 September 2026.

What could break the AbbVie Inc. story?

Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 68th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 17 September 2026.

Is AbbVie Inc. a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: AbbVie Inc.'s balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 17 September 2026.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-09-17. Every chart on this page is drawn by deterministic code from the raw series — no forecasts, no price opinions, and nothing here is investment advice.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI