Sector Alpha Week of 2026-09-16
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials Stocks

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials: ASML Holding N.V. owns the largest revenue base; Teradyne, Inc. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Semiconductor Equipment & Materials moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 116% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 1% on average over the last four reported quarters.

FADING · −5 in 4w~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming0 of the 26 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 5/26 >200d (−14) · 0/26 lead (−5) · EPS 15/26↑

20050020262025202420232022 616347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 24 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 26 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 29 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 19.1% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · down 16.7% on a year ago · 23 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 31.9% on a year ago · 28 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 71, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 25 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 78, against 100 at the start · down 12.0% on a year ago · 24 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 94, against 100 at the start · down 4.6% on a year ago · 24 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 8.8% on a year ago · 24 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 74, against 100 at the start · up 5.6% on a year ago · 23 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 66, against 100 at the start · up 12.0% on a year ago · 23 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 5.5% on a year ago · 23 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 15.5% on a year ago · 22 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 61, against 100 at the start · down 9.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · down 16.0% on a year ago · 24 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or twoNOT REPORTED YET62 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20050020262025202420232022 616347 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100119Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 24 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 26 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 29 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 119, against 100 at the start · up 19.1% on a year ago · 17 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · down 16.7% on a year ago · 23 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 60, against 100 at the start · down 31.9% on a year ago · 28 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 71, against 100 at the start · down 22.2% on a year ago · 25 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 78, against 100 at the start · down 12.0% on a year ago · 24 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 94, against 100 at the start · down 4.6% on a year ago · 24 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 8.8% on a year ago · 24 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 74, against 100 at the start · up 5.6% on a year ago · 23 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 66, against 100 at the start · up 12.0% on a year ago · 23 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 54, against 100 at the start · down 5.5% on a year ago · 23 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 57, against 100 at the start · down 15.5% on a year ago · 22 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 61, against 100 at the start · down 9.9% on a year ago · 22 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 62, against 100 at the start · down 16.0% on a year ago · 24 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two62No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 26 of its 29 companies — the 3 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Semiconductor Equipment & Materials outperforming S&P 500?

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has outperformed S&P 500 by 81.9% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 33.6%. 15 of 28 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Aehr Test Systems, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +43.4%.

-33.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+81.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
15/28Stocks leading S&P 500
8/28Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has outperformed S&P 500 by 81.9% over 52 weeks and 33.6% over 13 weeks. 15 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 28 beat the sector itself. ASML Holding N.V. leads with revenue of $35,328 million, based on 20 of 29 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
29
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$1.7T
ASML Holding N.V.
Revenue growing
14/20
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
15/28
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 29
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Teradyne, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 81.1% evidence confidence.
Photronics, Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Teradyne, Inc.TER 78.1/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 30.9/35 Revenue 57.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 19 pp 83% evidence 17.4/25 ROCE 12.7% · OPM 32.9% 76% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 59.9× · PEG 1.04 65% evidence 17.6/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 10.8% · 1Y 184.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.9 + 17.4 + 12.2 + 17.6 = 78.1 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Lam Research CorporationLRCX 71.5/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 28.8/35 Revenue 26% · PAT 35.6% · OPM change 3.7 pp 83% evidence 21.4/25 ROCE 46.6% · OPM 37.4% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 65.3× · PEG 1.68 65% evidence 12.3/20 RS sector -1.8% · RS bench 4.7% · 1Y 112.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 28.8 + 21.4 + 9 + 12.3 = 71.5 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT 62.6/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence FADING 19.2/35 Revenue 7.8% · PAT 35.6% · OPM change 3.1 pp 95% evidence 20.4/25 ROCE 29% · OPM 33.7% 76% evidence 11.8/20 P/E 45.9× · PEG 1.21 65% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector -2.1% · RS bench 3.9% · 1Y 118.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.2 + 20.4 + 11.8 + 11.2 = 62.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4ASML Holding N.V.ASML 62.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence FADING 20.9/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT 13% · OPM change 2.5 pp 83% evidence 21.1/25 ROCE 44.6% · OPM 37.1% 76% evidence 5.6/20 P/E 57× · PEG 3.89 65% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 7% · 1Y 71.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.9 + 21.1 + 5.6 + 14.5 = 62.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
5FormFactor, Inc.FORM 57.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 21.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.5 pp 39% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 7.4% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 89.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.0/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 6.5% · 1Y 197.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 12.4 + 9 + 14 = 57 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC 55.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 20 pp 39% evidence 12.2/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.1/20 RS sector -1.1% · RS bench 3.4% · 1Y 89.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 12.2 + 9.7 + 11.1 = 55.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Cohu, Inc.COHU 53.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence FADING 19.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 39% evidence 5.4/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -8.9% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 60× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.3/20 RS sector 22.4% · RS bench 28% · 1Y 126.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.7 + 5.4 + 9.8 + 18.3 = 53.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8ACM Research, Inc.ACMR 52.3/100Mixed-positive evidence66% evidence FADING 17.1/35 Revenue 19.7% · PAT -9% · OPM change 0.6 pp 53% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 15.6% 57% evidence 15.0/20 P/E 30× · PEG 0.75 65% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 3.5% · 1Y 80.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.1 + 11.8 + 15 + 8.4 = 52.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9KLA CorporationKLAC 51.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 18.2/35 Revenue 11.7% · PAT 18.9% · OPM change -0.1 pp 83% evidence 21.0/25 ROCE 41.5% · OPM 42.5% 76% evidence 4.2/20 P/E 81.6× · PEG 4 65% evidence 8.4/20 RS sector -10.2% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y 60.2%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 21 + 4.2 + 8.4 = 51.8 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
10Photronics, Inc.PLAB 50.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 14.0/35 Revenue 0.5% · PAT 24.1% · OPM change -6.3 pp 83% evidence 13.6/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 20.1% 76% evidence 16.3/20 P/E 18.2× · PEG 0.43 65% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -29.2% · RS bench -21.4% · 1Y 11.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14 + 13.6 + 16.3 + 7 = 50.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
11AXT, Inc.AXTI 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 21.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 47.2 pp 39% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM -5.9% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 3604× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 39.2% · RS bench 28.9% · 1Y 1381.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.3 + 7 + 8.5 + 13.9 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Qnity Electronics, Inc.Q 49.9/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence ASLEEP 15.2/35 Revenue 14.8% · PAT -23.6% · OPM change -1.7 pp 83% evidence 14.5/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 19.3% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 58.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —1 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 14.5 + 10.2 + 10 = 49.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Entegris, Inc.ENTG 49.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 16.4/35 Revenue 3.2% · PAT 3.4% · OPM change 4.2 pp 83% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 19.3% 76% evidence 7.6/20 P/E 80.6× · PEG 1.94 65% evidence 11.1/20 RS sector -7% · RS bench 1.7% · 1Y 39.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 14 + 7.6 + 11.1 = 49.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -34.9 pp 39% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -0.7% · OPM -41% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 12.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.9/20 RS sector 43.4% · RS bench 41% · 1Y 181.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 5 + 11.5 + 14.9 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
15Camtek Ltd.CAMT 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT -61.7% · OPM change -5.2 pp 53% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 22.4% 57% evidence 12.2/20 P/E 174.3× · PEG 0.8 65% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector -18.9% · RS bench -10.3% · 1Y 42%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 13.1 + 12.2 + 8.1 = 46.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
16Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR 46.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 20.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.6 pp 39% evidence 12.2/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 6% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 38.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.9/20 RS sector -21.2% · RS bench -15.5% · 1Y 63.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.2 + 12.2 + 10.8 + 2.9 = 46.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Nova Ltd.NVMI 45.5/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 19.5/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT 24.6% · OPM change 0.5 pp 53% evidence 14.7/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 30.1% 57% evidence 7.0/20 P/E 54.1× · PEG 2.56 65% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -30.8% · RS bench -23.3% · 1Y 9.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.5 + 14.7 + 7 + 4.3 = 45.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.UCTT 45.3/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence ASLEEP 14.6/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -574.4% · OPM change -0.4 pp 40% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 2.1% 57% evidence 10.9/20 P/E 35.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.7/20 RS sector 3.6% · RS bench 4% · 1Y 140.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.6 + 8.1 + 10.9 + 11.7 = 45.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Ichor Holdings, Ltd.ICHR 43.9/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence ASLEEP 16.6/35 Revenue 7.6% · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 40% evidence 7.5/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 0.8% 57% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.3/20 RS sector 2.1% · RS bench 0.5% · 1Y 179%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 7.5 + 10.5 + 9.3 = 43.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
20Ambarella, Inc.AMBA 42.3/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BASING 21.5/35 Revenue 27.8% · PAT — · OPM change 10.8 pp 62% evidence 3.5/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -19.3% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -30.5% · RS bench -17.3% · 1Y -24.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 3.5 + 10 + 7.3 = 42.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
21IPG Photonics CorporationIPGP 42.2/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence BASING 15.5/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT — · OPM change -3.7 pp 40% evidence 8.2/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -2.9% 57% evidence 13.2/20 P/E 166.1× · PEG 0.67 65% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -34.7% · RS bench -26.6% · 1Y -5.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 8.2 + 13.2 + 5.3 = 42.2 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
22Axcelis Technologies, Inc.ACLS 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 11.1/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT -44.1% · OPM change -11.1 pp 53% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 4% 57% evidence 12.8/20 P/E 29× · PEG 1.16 65% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -18.8% · RS bench -11.8% · 1Y 8.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.1 + 10.4 + 12.8 + 4.3 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
23Veeco Instruments Inc.VECO 37.3/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence ASLEEP 10.6/35 Revenue -7.8% · PAT -64.1% · OPM change -10.2 pp 53% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.7% 57% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 89.1× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence 4.4/20 RS sector -12.6% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y 43.7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.6 + 8.5 + 13.8 + 4.4 = 37.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
24Trio-Tech InternationalTRT 53.9/100Thin evidence · provisional14% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 12.5/25 ROCE — · OPM — 0% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench 43.9% · 1Y 259.6%2 of 2 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.5 + 10 + 13.9 = 53.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Onto Innovation Inc.ONTO 46.5/100Thin evidence · provisional46% evidence FADING 14.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -18.5 pp 24% evidence 10.5/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 5.2% 57% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 59.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y 98.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.7 + 10.5 + 10.1 + 11.2 = 46.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Amtech Systems, Inc.ASYS 45.2/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 19.4/35 Revenue -13.2% · PAT — · OPM change 211.5 pp 40% evidence 9.9/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 8.8% 57% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 68.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.4/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -7.3% · 1Y 53.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 9.9 + 9.5 + 6.4 = 45.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
27InTest CorporationINTT 41.4/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue -5.5% · PAT — · OPM change 13.6 pp 40% evidence 9.2/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 2.8% 57% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 341.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.0/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -16.5% · 1Y 35.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 9.2 + 8.6 + 5 = 41.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Atomera IncorporatedATOM 41.2/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence ASLEEP 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 79084.1 pp 24% evidence 6.8/25 ROCE -19.5% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.3/20 RS sector -29% · RS bench -26.3% · 1Y 3.2%2 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 6.8 + 10 + 4.3 = 41.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
29Daqo New Energy Corp.DQ 33.0/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence BASING 12.2/35 Revenue -22.8% · PAT — · OPM change -472.4 pp 40% evidence 6.4/25 ROCE -2.6% · OPM -564.4% 57% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 12.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -62% · RS bench -51.9% · 1Y -58.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 12.2 + 6.4 + 11.4 + 3 = 33 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 29 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

AXT, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials at +1381.6%. Trio-Tech International leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +43.9%. 15 of 28 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

ASML Holding N.V. has the highest Revenue among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at $35,328 million. Applied Materials, Inc. is next at $30,837 million. Teradyne, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 57.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 20 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: ASML Holding N.V. is the scale leader at $35,328 million, 14.6% ahead of Applied Materials, Inc.. Teradyne, Inc.'s growth is 57.8% from a $4,463 million base, with 17 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderASML Holding N.V. · $35,328 million
Gap14.6% versus #2 · Applied Materials, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage20/29 companies · 484 observations

Investor read: ASML Holding N.V. is the scale benchmark; Teradyne, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: ASML Holding N.V.'s growth falls below Teradyne, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1ASML Holding N.V. ASML$35.3B
4KLA Corporation KLAC$13.6B
Revenue growthfastest growers
4Nova Ltd. NVMI · older report21%
5ACM Research, Inc. ACMR · older report20%
Revenue · company comparison
20/29 level · 20/29 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
ASML Holding N.V. ASML$9.3B21%Jun 2026
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT$9.1B25%Sep 2026
Lam Research Corporation LRCX$6.7B30%Jun 2026
KLA Corporation KLAC$3.7B15%Jun 2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR$1.7B27%Jun 2026
Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q$1.4B22%Jun 2026
Teradyne, Inc. TER$1.3B104%Jun 2026
Entegris, Inc. ENTG$883M11%Jun 2026
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT$534M2.9%Mar 2026
Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO$267M0.0%Mar 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP$265M16%Mar 2026
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR$256M4.9%Mar 2026
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC$243M64%Jun 2026
Nova Ltd. NVMI$235M10%Mar 2026
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR$231M34%Mar 2026
FormFactor, Inc. FORM$226M32%Jun 2026
Photronics, Inc. PLAB$210M-0.5%Jun 2026
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS$199M3.1%Mar 2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO$158M-5.4%Mar 2026
Cohu, Inc. COHU$125M29%Jun 2026
Camtek Ltd. CAMT$122M2.5%Mar 2026
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA$100M16%Jun 2026
InTest Corporation INTT$34M26%Mar 2026
AXT, Inc. AXTI$27M42%Jun 2026
Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ$27M-78%Mar 2026
Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS$20M25%Mar 2026
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR$10M-44%Jun 2026
Atomera Incorporated ATOM$0M-100%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.1B
$1.9B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$1.9B
$1.6B
$1.3B
$1.5B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.7B

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

$6.1B
$6.3B
$6.2B
$6.5B
$6.7B
$6.7B
$6.6B
$6.4B
$6.7B
$6.7B
$6.6B
$6.8B
$7.0B
$7.2B
$7.1B
$7.3B
$6.8B
$7.0B
$7.9B
$9.1B

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

$5.2B
$3.5B
$5.4B
$5.8B
$6.7B
$6.9B
$6.7B
$5.3B
$6.2B
$7.5B
$9.3B
$7.7B
$7.7B
$7.5B
$9.7B
$8.8B
$9.3B

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

$74M
$77M
$80M
$82M
$82M
$72M
$74M
$80M
$89M
$97M
$103M
$112M
$117M
$119M
$123M
$126M
$128M
$122M

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

$579M
$650M
$692M
$994M
$922M
$901M
$812M
$771M
$813M
$808M
$850M
$773M
$792M
$807M
$824M
$812M
$883M

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

$205M
$197M
$204M
$181M
$166M
$167M
$156M
$168M
$169M
$197M
$208M
$189M
$171M
$196M
$203M
$215M
$226M

KLA Corporation · KLAC

$2.4B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.7B
$3.0B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.4B
$2.6B
$2.8B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.2B
$3.2B
$3.3B
$3.4B
$3.7B

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

$4.2B
$4.1B
$4.6B
$5.1B
$5.3B
$3.9B
$3.2B
$3.5B
$3.8B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$4.2B
$4.4B
$4.7B
$5.2B
$5.3B
$5.3B
$5.8B
$6.7B

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

$122M
$134M
$142M
$144M
$151M
$132M
$123M
$129M
$134M
$142M
$157M
$179M
$195M
$213M
$220M
$225M
$223M
$235M

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

$226M
$241M
$256M
$254M
$199M
$191M
$219M
$229M
$242M
$252M
$264M
$267M
$254M
$218M
$267M

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.4B

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

$951M
$755M
$841M
$827M
$618M
$684M
$704M
$600M
$730M
$737M
$753M
$686M
$652M
$769M
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.3B

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

7.0%
24%
10%
-7.8%
-3.1%
-13%
-8.1%
-7.2%
0.2%
2.2%
-7.0%
-3.2%
3.4%
6.7%
16%
27%

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

5.2%
10%
7.5%
6.2%
-1.5%
-0.4%
-0.5%
0.2%
5.5%
4.8%
6.8%
6.8%
7.7%
-3.5%
-2.2%
11%
25%

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

35%
10%
91%
27%
15%
-7.5%
8.2%
39%
46%
23%
0.7%
4.9%
13%
21%

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

19%
15%
11%
-6.5%
-7.5%
-2.4%
8.5%
35%
39%
40%
31%
23%
19%
13%
9.4%
2.5%

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

21%
72%
42%
30%
-18%
-12%
-10%
4.7%
0.3%
-2.6%
-0.1%
-3.1%
5.1%
11%

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

8.5%
-4.7%
-19%
-18%
-14%
1.2%
18%
33%
13%
1.2%
-0.5%
-2.4%
14%
32%

KLA Corporation · KLAC

29%
31%
27%
6.3%
-5.3%
-12%
-17%
-3.0%
9.1%
19%
24%
30%
24%
13%
7.2%
11%
15%

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

12%
18%
25%
-4.7%
-31%
-31%
-29%
-2.0%
21%
20%
16%
24%
34%
28%
22%
24%
30%

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

45%
27%
24%
-1.5%
-13%
-10%
-11%
7.6%
28%
39%
46%
50%
40%
26%
14%
10%

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

25%
27%
-17%
-25%
-14%
22%
32%
21%
17%
5.0%
-13%
0.0%

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

11%
8.1%
18%
22%

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

-23%
-13%
-18%
-19%
-15%
18%
7.8%
7.0%
14%
-11%
4.3%
44%
87%
104%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

KLA Corporation has the highest OPM among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 42.5%. Lam Research Corporation is next at 37.4%. Atomera Incorporated has the highest Margin change at +79084.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: KLA Corporation leads opm at 42.5%; Atomera Incorporated leads margin change at +79084.1 percentage points.

LeaderKLA Corporation · 42.5%
Gap13.6% versus #2 · Lam Research Corporation
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/29 companies · 472 observations

Investor read: KLA Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
1Atomera Incorporated ATOM · older report+79,084.1 pp
2Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS · older report+211.5 pp
3AXT, Inc. AXTI+47.2 pp
5Cohu, Inc. COHU+19.3 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
27/29 level · 28/29 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
KLA Corporation KLAC43%−0.1 ppJun 2026
Lam Research Corporation LRCX37%+3.7 ppJun 2026
ASML Holding N.V. ASML37%+2.5 ppJun 2026
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT34%+3.1 ppSep 2026
Teradyne, Inc. TER33%+19.0 ppJun 2026
Nova Ltd. NVMI30%+0.5 ppMar 2026
Camtek Ltd. CAMT22%−5.2 ppMar 2026
Photronics, Inc. PLAB20%−6.3 ppJun 2026
Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q19%−1.7 ppJun 2026
Entegris, Inc. ENTG19%+4.2 ppJun 2026
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC16%+20.0 ppJun 2026
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR16%+0.6 ppMar 2026
Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS8.8%+211.5 ppMar 2026
FormFactor, Inc. FORM7.4%+5.5 ppJun 2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR6.0%+3.6 ppJun 2026
Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO5.2%−18.5 ppMar 2026
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS4.0%−11.1 ppMar 2026
InTest Corporation INTT2.8%+13.6 ppMar 2026
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT2.1%−0.4 ppMar 2026
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR0.8%+1.3 ppMar 2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO-1.7%−10.2 ppMar 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP-2.9%−3.7 ppMar 2026
AXT, Inc. AXTI-5.9%+47.2 ppJun 2026
Cohu, Inc. COHU-8.9%+19.3 ppJun 2026
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA-19%+10.8 ppJun 2026
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR-41%−34.9 ppJun 2026
Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ-564%−472.4 ppMar 2026
Atomera Incorporated ATOM-872%+79,084.1 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

15%
13%
9.5%
15%
12%
4.7%
5.2%
9.1%
9.1%
5.4%
5.6%
8.0%
8.3%
2.4%
6.1%
8.0%
9.8%
6.0%

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

33%
31%
30%
30%
30%
29%
29%
28%
29%
29%
29%
29%
29%
30%
31%
31%
28%
30%
32%
34%

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

37%
22%
30%
34%
33%
33%
33%
26%
29%
33%
36%
35%
35%
33%
35%
36%
37%

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

26%
25%
26%
25%
25%
20%
20%
24%
19%
22%
25%
26%
27%
28%
26%
25%
25%
22%

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

24%
26%
23%
13%
15%
15%
15%
17%
16%
17%
20%
16%
15%
15%
14%
18%
19%

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

16%
17%
16%
2.2%
-9.6%
0.1%
-0.8%
48%
13%
9.0%
8.6%
4.1%
1.9%
6.3%
8.9%
11%
7.4%

KLA Corporation · KLAC

41%
39%
39%
41%
40%
35%
35%
38%
38%
34%
38%
39%
40%
43%
43%
42%
41%
41%
43%

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

32%
29%
32%
34%
32%
27%
27%
30%
29%
29%
29%
30%
31%
33%
34%
34%
34%
35%
37%

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

25%
28%
26%
27%
24%
27%
23%
27%
25%
26%
29%
28%
29%
30%
30%
28%
27%
30%

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

22%
24%
22%
23%
15%
13%
13%
19%
20%
21%
16%
24%
13%
11%
5.2%

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

21%
21%
21%
21%
21%
20%
21%
19%

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

34%
25%
30%
28%
15%
20%
21%
13%
29%
21%
20%
18%
14%
19%
27%
37%
33%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

−1.5 pp
+2.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−8.5 pp
−4.3 pp
−6.2 pp
−2.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.0 pp
+0.5 pp
0.0 pp
+1.5 pp
+3.6 pp

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

−3.0 pp
−3.5 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.3 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.1 pp

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

−0.4 pp
−3.1 pp
+10.5 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+3.5 pp
+9.1 pp
+5.2 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.5 pp

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

+0.9 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.7 pp
−6.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−5.5 pp
+2.3 pp
+5.0 pp
+2.7 pp
+7.3 pp
+5.7 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−5.2 pp

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

−1.1 pp
−11.6 pp
−11.6 pp
−8.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.3 pp
+4.9 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−5.4 pp
+1.8 pp
+4.2 pp

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

+5.2 pp
−10.0 pp
−25.1 pp
−15.9 pp
−3.0 pp
+57.9 pp
+8.9 pp
+9.4 pp
−44.2 pp
−10.7 pp
−2.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+6.8 pp
+5.5 pp

KLA Corporation · KLAC

+1.7 pp
+1.5 pp
−0.9 pp
−3.7 pp
−4.2 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.2 pp
+3.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.1 pp
+8.3 pp
+4.6 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.1 pp

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

+0.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−4.8 pp
−3.8 pp
−3.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.9 pp
+4.4 pp
+4.5 pp
+4.1 pp
+3.4 pp
+1.9 pp
+3.7 pp

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

−1.7 pp
−4.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+5.7 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.4 pp
+3.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.5 pp

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

+5.7 pp
+0.9 pp
−9.7 pp
−9.4 pp
−10.4 pp
+5.6 pp
+8.0 pp
+3.2 pp
+5.0 pp
−7.5 pp
−10.1 pp
−18.5 pp

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

+0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.7 pp

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

−6.3 pp
−5.9 pp
−9.6 pp
−9.1 pp
−7.5 pp
+13.8 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+4.6 pp
−14.9 pp
−1.7 pp
+6.7 pp
+19.3 pp
+19.0 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

ASML Holding N.V. has the highest Net profit among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at $10,640 million. Applied Materials, Inc. is next at $9,267 million. Teradyne, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: ASML Holding N.V. leads with $10,640 million of TTM profit, 14.8% above Applied Materials, Inc.. Teradyne, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (139.4% uncapped) growth from a $1,166 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderASML Holding N.V. · $10,640 million
Gap14.8% versus #2 · Applied Materials, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/29 companies · 489 observations

Investor read: ASML Holding N.V. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1ASML Holding N.V. ASML$10.6B
4KLA Corporation KLAC$4.8B
5Teradyne, Inc. TER$1.2B
Profit growthfastest growers
4Nova Ltd. NVMI · older report25%
Net profit · company comparison
21/29 level · 13/29 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
ASML Holding N.V. ASML$2.9B27%Jun 2026
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT$2.5B43%Sep 2026
Lam Research Corporation LRCX$2.3B32%Jun 2026
KLA Corporation KLAC$1.4B13%Jun 2026
Teradyne, Inc. TER$377M349%Jun 2026
Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q$136M-31%Jun 2026
Entegris, Inc. ENTG$94M77%Jun 2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR$84M282%Jun 2026
Nova Ltd. NVMI$69M6.2%Mar 2026
Photronics, Inc. PLAB$43M79%Jun 2026
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC$35M-93%Jun 2026
Camtek Ltd. CAMT$32M-5.9%Mar 2026
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR$26M4.0%Mar 2026
FormFactor, Inc. FORM$20M233%Jun 2026
Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO$11M-83%Mar 2026
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS$9M-69%Mar 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP$2M-50%Mar 2026
Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS$1M-3,300%Mar 2026
InTest Corporation INTT$1M-50%Mar 2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO$0M-100%Mar 2026
AXT, Inc. AXTI$-1M-500%Jun 2026
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR$-2M-186%Mar 2026
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR$-3M-300%Jun 2026
Atomera Incorporated ATOM$-6MMar 2026
Cohu, Inc. COHU$-12M-264%Jun 2026
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT$-15M-105%Mar 2026
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA$-18M-2,100%Jun 2026
Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ$-122M-432%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

$217M
$171M
$125M
$306M
$164M
$45M
$64M
$133M
$119M
$60M
$67M
$123M
$106M
$22M
$55M
$127M
$173M
$84M

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.2B
$2.1B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$2.8B
$2.5B

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

$1.7B
$695M
$1.4B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$1.9B
$1.9B
$1.2B
$1.6B
$2.1B
$2.7B
$2.4B
$2.3B
$2.1B
$2.8B
$2.8B
$2.9B

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

$13M
$18M
$19M
$21M
$22M
$17M
$19M
$22M
$21M
$25M
$28M
$33M
$33M
$34M
$34M
$-53M
$36M
$32M

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

$117M
$126M
$99M
$-74M
$-88M
$198M
$38M
$45M
$68M
$78M
$102M
$63M
$53M
$71M
$49M
$92M
$94M

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

$26M
$30M
$30M
$4M
$-14M
$1M
$1M
$76M
$22M
$19M
$19M
$10M
$6M
$9M
$16M
$23M
$20M

KLA Corporation · KLAC

$717M
$731M
$805M
$1.0B
$979M
$698M
$685M
$741M
$583M
$602M
$836M
$946M
$825M
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.4B

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

$1.2B
$1.0B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.5B
$814M
$803M
$887M
$954M
$966M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$2.3B

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

$22M
$34M
$35M
$35M
$36M
$35M
$30M
$34M
$38M
$37M
$45M
$51M
$50M
$65M
$68M
$61M
$65M
$69M

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

$47M
$53M
$52M
$52M
$29M
$26M
$30M
$47M
$53M
$53M
$49M
$64M
$34M
$28M
$11M

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

$207M
$221M
$199M
$198M
$223M
$109M
$162M
$136M

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

$257M
$162M
$198M
$183M
$84M
$120M
$128M
$64M
$186M
$147M
$152M
$104M
$84M
$125M
$260M
$404M
$377M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

-0.8%
68%
-24%
-74%
-49%
-57%
-27%
33%
4.7%
-7.5%
-11%
-63%
-18%
3.3%
63%
282%

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

-6.4%
-7.1%
-4.2%
2.5%
-2.9%
26%
18%
9.3%
9.3%
-14%
-41%
24%
4.3%
9.6%
71%
31%
43%

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

38%
-2.2%
181%
38%
11%
-19%
7.0%
42%
92%
45%
2.3%
5.5%
17%
27%

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

19%
11%
69%
-5.6%
0.0%
4.8%
-4.6%
47%
47%
50%
57%
36%
21%
-261%
9.1%
-5.9%

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

11%
-163%
-170%
100%
-61%
168%
40%
-22%
-9.0%
-52%
46%
77%

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

67%
-80%
-154%
-97%
-75%
1,800%
1,800%
-87%
-73%
-53%
-16%
130%
233%

KLA Corporation · KLAC

27%
-3.9%
37%
-4.5%
-15%
-28%
-40%
-14%
22%
28%
42%
81%
44%
19%
39%
10%
13%

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

5.6%
21%
23%
-20%
-34%
-38%
-35%
19%
27%
26%
25%
38%
69%
41%
34%
37%
32%

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

52%
17%
64%
2.9%
-14%
-2.9%
5.6%
5.7%
50%
50%
32%
76%
51%
20%
30%
6.2%

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

51%
44%
-45%
-50%
-42%
83%
104%
63%
36%
-36%
-47%
-83%

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

7.7%
-51%
-19%
-31%

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

-40%
-29%
-48%
-39%
-30%
121%
23%
19%
63%
-55%
-15%
71%
288%
349%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Lam Research Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 46.6%. ASML Holding N.V. is next at 44.6%. Amtech Systems, Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +42.7 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 28 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Lam Research Corporation leads ROCE at 46.6%, 2 percentage points above ASML Holding N.V.. Amtech Systems, Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +42.7 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderLam Research Corporation · 46.6%
Gap4.5% versus #2 · ASML Holding N.V.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage28/29 companies · 494 observations

Investor read: Lam Research Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS · older report+42.7 pp
2Teradyne, Inc. TER+9.7 pp
4Atomera Incorporated ATOM · older report+5.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
28/29 level · 28/29 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Lam Research Corporation LRCX47%+6.7 ppJun 2026
ASML Holding N.V. ASML45%+1.9 ppJun 2026
KLA Corporation KLAC42%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT29%−3.8 ppSep 2026
Teradyne, Inc. TER13%+9.7 ppJun 2026
Entegris, Inc. ENTG7.1%+0.2 ppJun 2026
Nova Ltd. NVMI5.6%−1.0 ppMar 2026
FormFactor, Inc. FORM5.2%+4.0 ppJun 2026
Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q4.3%0.0 ppJun 2026
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC4.0%+4.6 ppJun 2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR3.0%+1.4 ppJun 2026
Camtek Ltd. CAMT2.7%−1.8 ppMar 2026
Photronics, Inc. PLAB2.6%−1.2 ppJun 2026
Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS2.5%+42.7 ppMar 2026
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR2.0%−0.2 ppMar 2026
AXT, Inc. AXTI1.7%+4.3 ppJun 2026
InTest Corporation INTT0.8%+3.2 ppMar 2026
Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO0.7%−2.7 ppMar 2026
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS0.7%−2.0 ppMar 2026
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT0.7%−0.1 ppMar 2026
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR0.2%+0.3 ppMar 2026
Cohu, Inc. COHU0.0%+1.8 ppJun 2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO-0.2%−1.5 ppMar 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP-0.4%−0.5 ppMar 2026
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR-0.7%+1.9 ppJun 2026
Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ-2.6%−0.8 ppMar 2026
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA-3.2%+1.3 ppJun 2026
Atomera Incorporated ATOM-20%+5.7 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

6.3%
5.0%
3.4%
7.1%
4.7%
1.4%
1.6%
3.3%
3.0%
1.4%
1.6%
2.8%
2.5%
0.6%
1.6%
2.8%
3.1%
1.7%
3.0%

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

37%
41%
42%
40%
40%
38%
37%
35%
33%
31%
31%
30%
30%
32%
33%
33%
30%
28%
28%
29%

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

34%
35%
36%
36%
44%
37%
41%
34%
32%
31%
32%
38%
43%
43%
43%
42%
45%

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

5.3%
5.1%
5.2%
4.9%
3.8%
2.5%
2.5%
3.1%
2.7%
3.4%
3.9%
4.3%
4.3%
4.5%
4.2%
3.5%
3.3%
2.7%

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

19%
21%
12%
6.7%
7.0%
6.7%
6.4%
6.7%
6.7%
6.6%
7.2%
7.0%
6.9%
6.8%
6.2%
6.4%
7.1%

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

3.8%
3.9%
3.8%
0.5%
-1.8%
0.0%
-0.1%
8.9%
2.3%
1.9%
1.9%
0.8%
0.3%
1.2%
1.7%
2.2%
1.5%
5.2%

KLA Corporation · KLAC

36%
37%
38%
40%
41%
40%
39%
37%
36%
33%
34%
35%
38%
41%
42%
43%
42%
42%
42%

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

41%
42%
43%
42%
41%
40%
36%
32%
28%
29%
30%
32%
33%
37%
40%
43%
46%
48%
47%

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

5.4%
6.3%
5.9%
6.0%
5.4%
4.9%
3.8%
4.3%
4.1%
4.3%
5.6%
5.7%
6.1%
6.6%
6.3%
4.3%
3.9%
5.6%

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

3.5%
4.0%
3.8%
3.9%
1.8%
1.5%
1.7%
2.5%
2.8%
2.9%
2.3%
3.4%
1.7%
1.2%
0.7%

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2.0%
2.4%
2.0%
4.2%
4.3%

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

11%
6.3%
8.7%
8.2%
3.3%
5.2%
5.4%
2.8%
7.3%
5.2%
5.2%
4.1%
3.0%
4.7%
9.5%
15%
13%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

−1.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−3.8 pp
−1.7 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.8 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.4 pp

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

+2.9 pp
−2.9 pp
−5.2 pp
−5.8 pp
−7.4 pp
−6.3 pp
−6.3 pp
−5.1 pp
−2.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−3.3 pp
−4.4 pp
−3.8 pp

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

+1.8 pp
+8.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+5.3 pp
−11.8 pp
−5.9 pp
−9.8 pp
+3.6 pp
+11.0 pp
+12.1 pp
+11.4 pp
+4.3 pp
+1.9 pp

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

−1.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.8 pp

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

−12.0 pp
−14.1 pp
−4.9 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.2 pp

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

−5.6 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.6 pp
+10.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+2.0 pp
−8.1 pp
−2.0 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.2 pp
+4.0 pp

KLA Corporation · KLAC

+5.1 pp
+3.4 pp
+1.1 pp
−2.9 pp
−4.4 pp
−7.3 pp
−4.9 pp
−1.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+8.0 pp
+8.1 pp
+7.2 pp
+3.8 pp
+0.5 pp
−0.3 pp

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

+0.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−6.3 pp
−9.4 pp
−13.6 pp
−10.6 pp
−6.3 pp
−0.3 pp
+5.5 pp
+7.2 pp
+9.9 pp
+10.5 pp
+12.5 pp
+11.3 pp
+6.7 pp

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

0.0 pp
−1.4 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.6 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.3 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−2.2 pp
−1.0 pp

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

−2.2 pp
−2.3 pp
−2.2 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−2.7 pp

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

+2.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.3 pp
0.0 pp

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

−3.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.5 pp
−2.8 pp
+4.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.3 pp
−4.3 pp
−0.5 pp
+4.3 pp
+10.5 pp
+9.7 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Photronics, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 0.43×. Veeco Instruments Inc. is next at 0.65×. Aehr Test Systems, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 12.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Photronics, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43×, 33.8% below Veeco Instruments Inc.. Only 13 of 29 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderPhotronics, Inc. · 0.43×
Gap33.8% versus #2 · Veeco Instruments Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/29 companies · 85 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
2Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO · older report0.7
3IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP · older report0.7
4ACM Research, Inc. ACMR · older report0.8
5Camtek Ltd. CAMT · older report0.8
P/Elowest P/E
2Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ · older report12.5
4Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS · older report29.0
5ACM Research, Inc. ACMR · older report30.0
Valuation · company comparison
13/29 level · 26/29 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
FormFactor, Inc. FORM4.389.6Jun 2026
KLA Corporation KLAC4.081.6Jun 2026
ASML Holding N.V. ASML3.957.0Jun 2026
Nova Ltd. NVMI2.654.2Mar 2026
Entegris, Inc. ENTG1.980.6Jun 2026
Lam Research Corporation LRCX1.765.3Jun 2026
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT1.245.9Sep 2026
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS1.229.0Mar 2026
Teradyne, Inc. TER1.059.9Jun 2026
Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO0.959.7Mar 2026
Camtek Ltd. CAMT0.8174.3Mar 2026
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR0.830.0Mar 2026
Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR0.738.7Jun 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP0.7166.1Mar 2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO0.789.1Mar 2026
Photronics, Inc. PLAB0.418.2Jun 2026
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR0.312.4Jun 2026
Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ0.112.5Mar 2026
Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q58.3Jun 2026
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC61.6Jun 2026
AXT, Inc. AXTI3,604.0Jun 2026
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT35.5Mar 2026
Cohu, Inc. COHU60.0Jun 2026
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR48.1Mar 2026
Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS68.7Mar 2026
InTest Corporation INTT341.3Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 18 companies with a series here. The remaining 6 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

ACM Research, Inc. · ACMR

0.8
0.7
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.8

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

4.7
0.7

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

1.8
1.4
1.6
1.3
3.4
1.2
1.3
1.2

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

1.2
0.7
0.8
1.3
2.6
3.9

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

1.2
2.3
3.8
6.0
3.0
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.8

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

1.9

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

4.3

KLA Corporation · KLAC

0.8
2.0
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.4
4.0

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

1.1
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.7

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

1.0
2.7
3.9
4.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.0
2.6

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

0.9

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

0.5
1.0

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 26 companies with a series here. The remaining 14 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Amkor Technology, Inc. · AMKR

9.5
7.7
6.0
5.1
7.7
10.0
12.7
13.7
22.8
21.2
26.2
20.7
18.0
14.1
17.1
22.7
26.3
25.7
38.7

Applied Materials, Inc. · AMAT

21.0
18.0
14.4
13.9
11.8
14.7
14.7
19.8
16.0
19.4
23.1
23.0
21.4
23.9
18.2
21.8
26.0
32.6
38.9
45.9

ASML Holding N.V. · ASML

47.5
46.6
30.6
31.0
35.8
35.3
29.0
49.4
56.2
43.0
35.2
28.1
28.2
33.3
37.0
44.1
57.0

Camtek Ltd. · CAMT

34.4
21.3
16.8
15.5
13.1
17.3
22.0
37.7
42.6
47.3
63.9
37.0
33.4
22.6
31.1
116.7
102.3
174.3

Entegris, Inc. · ENTG

44.9
37.7
26.1
46.8
178.0
99.6
67.4
110.9
75.9
51.1
43.3
42.2
48.9
54.2
65.3
80.6

FormFactor, Inc. · FORM

42.0
36.0
29.3
22.8
34.2
113.8
39.7
34.6
38.8
26.6
51.6
41.5
62.3
67.9
84.1
112.6
89.6

KLA Corporation · KLAC

21.8
17.5
14.3
13.1
15.1
15.8
19.6
20.2
29.3
36.2
40.2
35.0
26.3
24.5
29.2
33.5
35.0
41.3
81.6

Lam Research Corporation · LRCX

21.4
17.0
13.6
10.8
11.0
13.8
18.1
20.7
29.7
35.3
36.4
26.4
22.0
20.0
23.2
27.9
36.0
39.4
65.3

Nova Ltd. · NVMI

47.0
30.3
22.6
21.4
18.4
23.5
27.3
26.4
32.1
40.7
48.7
38.9
34.3
27.8
37.4
41.8
41.3
54.2

Onto Innovation Inc. · ONTO

35.4
24.6
16.5
15.7
21.9
33.2
62.2
64.4
65.5
58.4
42.0
27.6
24.5
36.0
59.7

Qnity Electronics, Inc. · Q

24.7
37.1
58.3

Teradyne, Inc. · TER

20.6
21.8
18.1
16.9
28.3
33.0
32.9
42.9
48.8
42.7
37.9
23.4
31.3
49.2
55.8
54.7
59.9
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 13 of the 29 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 13 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 29 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector outperforming S&P 500?

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has outperformed S&P 500 by 81.9% over 52 weeks and 33.6% over 13 weeks. 15 of 28 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 8 of 28 beat the sector itself.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is largest by revenue?

ASML Holding N.V. leads with revenue of $35,328 million, based on 20 of 29 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is growing fastest?

Teradyne, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 57.8%, across 20 of 29 comparable companies.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Teradyne, Inc. ranks first at 78.1/100 with 81.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Photronics, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43, among 13 of 29 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is the biggest?

ASML Holding N.V. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $35,328 million, ahead of Applied Materials, Inc. at $30,837 million. That covers 20 of 29 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the best profit margins?

KLA Corporation has the highest operating margin at 42.5%, from 27 of 29 comparable companies. Atomera Incorporated shows the biggest improvement (+79084.1 percentage points — see the chart above for the starting level). A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company makes the most profit?

ASML Holding N.V. earns the most, at $10,640 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 21 of 29 comparable companies. Teradyne, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company earns the highest return on capital?

Lam Research Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 46.6%, across 28 of 29 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Photronics, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.43×. Only 13 of 29 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector beating the market?

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has outperformed S&P 500 by 81.9% over the last 52 weeks and 33.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 15 of 28 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stock has the strongest price momentum?

Trio-Tech International has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company scores highest for research priority?

Teradyne, Inc. scores 78.1 out of 100 with 81.1% evidence confidence, from 30.9 points on growth and earnings, 17.4 on capital efficiency, 12.2 on valuation and 17.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 29 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector?

The 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on this page carry $1,687,724 million of combined market value. ASML Holding N.V. is the largest at $618,755 million, about 37% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.

What is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on this page is 59.9×, measured on the 26 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.

How is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector performing?

15 of the 28 covered Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 81.9% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.

How many Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 29 listed Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI