Semiconductor Equipment & Materials Stocks in the US
The 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies we score in the US are ASML Holding N.V. ($553.4B, the largest), Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation and 26 more. 2 of the 29 companies we score beat S&P 500 on share price over recent months (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Prices are as of 4 Nov 2026.
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials: ASML Holding N.V. owns the largest revenue base; Teradyne, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
The main question: the biggest companies are not always the ones changing the most.
Start with size. Then the direction of earnings. Then the quality of the business. A share price that leads means more once those three agree.
Which are the biggest Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks in the US?
The largest Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks in the US by market value are ASML Holding N.V. ($553.4B), Applied Materials, Inc. ($293.1B) and Lam Research Corporation ($276.6B), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.
- ASML Holding N.V.: $1,496.33 | market value $553.4B | P/E 43.3
- Applied Materials, Inc.: $369.34 | market value $293.1B | P/E 45.9
- Lam Research Corporation: $221.43 | market value $276.6B | P/E 46.7
- KLA Corporation: $149.83 | market value $195.2B | P/E 48.4
- Teradyne, Inc.: $251.17 | market value $39.2B | P/E 59.5
- Qnity Electronics, Inc.: $118.78 | market value $24.9B | P/E 58.3
- Entegris, Inc.: $142.87 | market value $21.8B | P/E 80.6
- Nova: $295.35 | market value $9.4B | P/E 63.8
- Onto Innovation Inc.: $184.82 | market value $9.1B | P/E 142
- Amkor Technology, Inc.: $35.66 | market value $8.8B | P/E 38.5
The other 19 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are in the full list below.
Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 4 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.
Which are the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks, ranked?
Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 4 Nov 2026.
- 1ASML Holding N.V.ASML · $553.4B76.2of 100favourable · strongest on ROCE and relative strength versus sector
- 2Lam Research CorporationLRCX · $276.6B71.8of 100favourable · strongest on ROCE and ROCE improvement
- 3Teradyne, Inc.TER · $39.2B67.7of 100favourable · strongest on ROCE and profit growth
- 4KLA CorporationKLAC · $195.2B63.2of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on ROCE and operating margin
- 5Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC · $3.6B60.0of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on margin improvement and revenue growth
- 6Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT · $293.1B58.2of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on ROCE and profit growth
- 7Cohu, Inc.COHU · $2.1B55.7of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on relative strength versus sector and ROCE improvement
- 8FormFactor, Inc.FORM · $6.7B55.3of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on profit growth and ROCE improvement
- 9Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR · $8.8B54.8of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on PEG and profit growth
- 10Photronics, Inc.PLAB · $1.6B53.9of 100mixed, leaning good · strongest on PEG and profit growth
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are listed in the US?
The largest 15 of 29 listed US Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are named here; all 29 are ranked in the scorecard. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large company cannot set the reading.
- ASML Holding N.V.$553.4B
- Applied Materials, Inc.$293.1B
- Lam Research Corporation$276.6B
- KLA Corporation$195.2B
- Teradyne, Inc.$39.2B
- Qnity Electronics, Inc.$24.9B
- Entegris, Inc.$21.8B
- Nova Ltd.$9.4B
- Onto Innovation Inc.$9.1B
- Amkor Technology, Inc.$8.8B
- FormFactor, Inc.$6.7B
- Camtek Ltd.$4.7B
- Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.$3.6B
- ACM Research, Inc.$3.1B
- AXT, Inc.$3.1B
The remaining 14 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are named and ranked in the scorecard.
How many Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies are listed in the US?
26 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies in the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 4 November 2026, and all 26 are listed below, largest first. The largest is ASML Holding N.V. ($553.4 billion) and the smallest with a market value is Amtech Systems, Inc.
| Company | Market value |
|---|---|
| 1. ASML Holding N.V. ASML | $553.4 billion |
| 2. Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | $293.1 billion |
| 3. Lam Research Corporation LRCX | $276.6 billion |
| 4. KLA Corporation KLAC | $195.2 billion |
| 5. Teradyne, Inc. TER | $39.2 billion |
| 6. Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | $24.8 billion |
| 7. Entegris, Inc. ENTG | $21.8 billion |
| 8. Nova Ltd. NVMI | $9.4 billion |
| 9. Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | $9.1 billion |
| 10. Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | $8.8 billion |
| 11. FormFactor, Inc. FORM | $6.7 billion |
| 12. Camtek Ltd. CAMT | $4.7 billion |
| 13. Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | $3.6 billion |
| 14. ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | $3.1 billion |
| 15. AXT, Inc. AXTI | $3.1 billion |
| 16. IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | $3 billion |
| 17. Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | $2.8 billion |
| 18. Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | $2.7 billion |
| 19. Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | $2.2 billion |
| 20. Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | $2.1 billion |
| 21. Cohu, Inc. COHU | $2.1 billion |
| 22. Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | $2 billion |
| 23. Photronics, Inc. PLAB | $1.6 billion |
| 24. Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | $1.3 billion |
| 25. Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | $813 million |
| 26. Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | $216 million |
Download all 26 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies (CSV)
How has Semiconductor Equipment & Materials moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 81% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 4% on average over the last four reported quarters.
Price up, without the fundamentals confirming. 0 of the 26 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months.
Not ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view this week; 1 of the 26 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (15 fewer than four weeks earlier); 0 of those 26 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (6 fewer than four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 17 of the 26 that report earnings.
Participation is shrinking, 6 → 0 of 26 over four weeks, after being ahead of S&P 500. Price-only fade, 17 of 26 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago, so the fade is in the price, not in the earnings.
1Y
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown
- Semiconductor Equipment & Materials 325
- S&P 500 228
| Week ending | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2025 | 200 | 200 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 193 | 196 |
| 28 Nov 2025 | 212 | 203 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 226 | 204 |
| 12 Dec 2025 | 232 | 203 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 229 | 203 |
| 26 Dec 2025 | 233 | 205 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 242 | 203 |
| 9 Jan 2026 | 270 | 207 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 289 | 206 |
| 23 Jan 2026 | 287 | 205 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 287 | 206 |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 302 | 206 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 326 | 203 |
| 20 Feb 2026 | 330 | 205 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 334 | 204 |
| 6 Mar 2026 | 297 | 200 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 310 | 197 |
| 20 Mar 2026 | 319 | 193 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 321 | 189 |
| 3 Apr 2026 | 332 | 195 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 390 | 202 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | 420 | 211 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 456 | 213 |
| 1 May 2026 | 433 | 215 |
| 8 May 2026 | 473 | 220 |
| 15 May 2026 | 460 | 220 |
| 22 May 2026 | 471 | 222 |
| 29 May 2026 | 462 | 225 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 438 | 220 |
| 12 Jun 2026 | 522 | 221 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 549 | 222 |
| 26 Jun 2026 | 504 | 217 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 469 | 222 |
| 10 Jul 2026 | 470 | 225 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 429 | 221 |
| 24 Jul 2026 | 428 | 220 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 415 | 222 |
| 7 Aug 2026 | 456 | 230 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 474 | 231 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | 426 | 228 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 397 | 229 |
| 4 Sep 2026 | 402 | 229 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 413 | 227 |
| 18 Sep 2026 | 405 | 227 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 437 | 230 |
| 2 Oct 2026 | 473 | 229 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 435 | 232 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 358 | 227 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 341 | 226 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 343 | 225 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 325 | 228 |
3Y
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 2nd week shown
- Semiconductor Equipment & Materials 479
- S&P 500 340
| Week ending | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Nov 2023 | 200 | 200 |
| 24 Nov 2023 | 202 | 202 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 204 | 204 |
| 22 Dec 2023 | 230 | 210 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 212 | 208 |
| 19 Jan 2024 | 231 | 214 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 226 | 219 |
| 16 Feb 2024 | 242 | 222 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 263 | 228 |
| 15 Mar 2024 | 246 | 226 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 255 | 232 |
| 12 Apr 2024 | 245 | 227 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 243 | 226 |
| 10 May 2024 | 255 | 231 |
| 24 May 2024 | 264 | 235 |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 268 | 237 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 275 | 242 |
| 5 Jul 2024 | 287 | 246 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 270 | 244 |
| 2 Aug 2024 | 221 | 236 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 249 | 246 |
| 30 Aug 2024 | 247 | 250 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 228 | 249 |
| 27 Sep 2024 | 243 | 254 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 246 | 257 |
| 25 Oct 2024 | 230 | 257 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 229 | 265 |
| 22 Nov 2024 | 221 | 264 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 224 | 270 |
| 20 Dec 2024 | 221 | 262 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 231 | 263 |
| 17 Jan 2025 | 240 | 265 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 228 | 267 |
| 14 Feb 2025 | 225 | 271 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 202 | 264 |
| 14 Mar 2025 | 197 | 250 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 179 | 247 |
| 11 Apr 2025 | 163 | 237 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 177 | 244 |
| 9 May 2025 | 175 | 250 |
| 23 May 2025 | 179 | 257 |
| 6 Jun 2025 | 193 | 266 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 194 | 264 |
| 4 Jul 2025 | 224 | 277 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 223 | 278 |
| 1 Aug 2025 | 215 | 276 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 223 | 285 |
| 29 Aug 2025 | 240 | 286 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 257 | 292 |
| 26 Sep 2025 | 286 | 294 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 272 | 290 |
| 24 Oct 2025 | 306 | 300 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 312 | 298 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 285 | 292 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 333 | 304 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 338 | 302 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 357 | 303 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 426 | 307 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 424 | 307 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 481 | 302 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 493 | 304 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 457 | 294 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 474 | 281 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 575 | 301 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 672 | 317 |
| 8 May 2026 | 699 | 327 |
| 22 May 2026 | 696 | 331 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 646 | 327 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 810 | 331 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 692 | 330 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 633 | 330 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 612 | 331 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 700 | 344 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 586 | 341 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 609 | 339 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 645 | 342 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 641 | 345 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 503 | 337 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 479 | 340 |
5Y
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials against S&P 500
Both lines start at 200 in the first week shown, every 4th week shown
- Semiconductor Equipment & Materials 446
- S&P 500 327
| Week ending | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2021 | 200 | 200 |
| 10 Dec 2021 | 198 | 201 |
| 7 Jan 2022 | 196 | 199 |
| 4 Feb 2022 | 175 | 191 |
| 4 Mar 2022 | 159 | 184 |
| 1 Apr 2022 | 164 | 193 |
| 29 Apr 2022 | 141 | 176 |
| 27 May 2022 | 154 | 177 |
| 24 Jun 2022 | 139 | 166 |
| 22 Jul 2022 | 150 | 169 |
| 19 Aug 2022 | 160 | 180 |
| 16 Sep 2022 | 136 | 164 |
| 14 Oct 2022 | 114 | 153 |
| 11 Nov 2022 | 151 | 170 |
| 9 Dec 2022 | 149 | 168 |
| 6 Jan 2023 | 150 | 166 |
| 3 Feb 2023 | 178 | 176 |
| 3 Mar 2023 | 169 | 172 |
| 31 Mar 2023 | 171 | 175 |
| 28 Apr 2023 | 150 | 177 |
| 26 May 2023 | 184 | 179 |
| 23 Jun 2023 | 189 | 185 |
| 21 Jul 2023 | 199 | 193 |
| 18 Aug 2023 | 186 | 186 |
| 15 Sep 2023 | 183 | 189 |
| 13 Oct 2023 | 184 | 184 |
| 10 Nov 2023 | 179 | 188 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 190 | 196 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 198 | 200 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 210 | 211 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 245 | 219 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 237 | 223 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 226 | 217 |
| 24 May 2024 | 246 | 226 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 256 | 232 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 252 | 234 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 231 | 236 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 212 | 240 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 229 | 247 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 213 | 255 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 208 | 259 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 215 | 252 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 212 | 257 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 188 | 253 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 166 | 237 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 164 | 235 |
| 23 May 2025 | 167 | 247 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 181 | 253 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 208 | 268 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 207 | 274 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 239 | 280 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 253 | 279 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 290 | 286 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 310 | 292 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 332 | 291 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 394 | 295 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 459 | 293 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 441 | 270 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 625 | 305 |
| 22 May 2026 | 647 | 318 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 754 | 319 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 589 | 317 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 651 | 331 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 567 | 326 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 597 | 332 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 446 | 327 |
Earnings, each company rebased to 100, the sector takes the median
Latest quarter April to June 2026: 77.2, from 23 companies
| Quarter | Median earnings index |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 | 100.0 (15 companies) |
| Apr 2022 | 102.4 (23 companies) |
| Jul 2022 | 108.4 (26 companies) |
| Oct 2022 | 110.0 (29 companies) |
| Jan 2023 | 119.1 (17 companies) |
| Apr 2023 | 85.4 (23 companies) |
| Jul 2023 | 57.5 (28 companies) |
| Oct 2023 | 71.5 (25 companies) |
| Jan 2024 | 78.1 (24 companies) |
| Apr 2024 | 90.7 (23 companies) |
| Jul 2024 | 96.6 (23 companies) |
| Oct 2024 | 74.7 (23 companies) |
| Jan 2025 | 66.1 (23 companies) |
| Apr 2025 | 54.0 (23 companies) |
| Jul 2025 | 57.1 (22 companies) |
| Oct 2025 | 61.2 (22 companies) |
| Jan 2026 | 62.1 (24 companies) |
| Apr 2026 | 77.2 (23 companies) |
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 26 of its 29 companies (the 3 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line). The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.
Is Semiconductor Equipment & Materials outperforming S&P 500?
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has done better than the S&P 500 by 42.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 28.1%. InTest Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +22.2%.
What is the bottom line on Semiconductor Equipment & Materials?
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has done better than the S&P 500 by 42.7% over 52 weeks, but is 28.1% behind over the last 13 weeks. 2 of 29 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet), and 8 of the 28 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.
How does each Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stock score?
A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.
ASML Holding N.V. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.
Photronics, Inc. scores well on valuation against its peers or its own history, but its earnings have not yet improved enough to back that up.
- 1ASML Holding N.V.ASML · quiet · favourable · 85% evidence76.2out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 25.6/35 · Revenue 22.5% · PAT 42.4% · OPM change 11.6 pp · 95% evidenceCapital efficiency 21.0/25 · ROCE 44.7% · OPM 44.4% · 76% evidenceValuation 13.2/20 · P/E 43.3× · PEG 0.97 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 16.4/20 · RS sector 8.1% · RS bench −6.1% · 1Y 47.1% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 25.6 + 21 + 13.2 + 16.4 = 76.2 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. - 2Lam Research CorporationLRCX · quiet · favourable · 85% evidence71.8out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 29.2/35 · Revenue 33.4% · PAT 45.4% · OPM change 5.6 pp · 95% evidenceCapital efficiency 21.4/25 · ROCE 50.7% · OPM 40% · 76% evidenceValuation 13.0/20 · P/E 46.7× · PEG 0.97 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 8.2/20 · RS sector −6% · RS bench −20% · 1Y 39% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 29.2 + 21.4 + 13 + 8.2 = 71.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 3Teradyne, Inc.TER · fading · favourable · 81% evidence67.7out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 31.0/35 · Revenue 57.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 18.9 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 20.4/25 · ROCE 36.7% · OPM 33.2% · 76% evidenceValuation 11.8/20 · P/E 59.5× · PEG 1.03 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 4.5/20 · RS sector −12% · RS bench −25.4% · 1Y 37.8% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 31 + 20.4 + 11.8 + 4.5 = 67.7 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is −12% and the one-year return is 37.8%. - 4KLA CorporationKLAC · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 85% evidence63.2out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 22.3/35 · Revenue 15.8% · PAT 24.1% · OPM change 3.3 pp · 95% evidenceCapital efficiency 21.1/25 · ROCE 44.7% · OPM 45% · 76% evidenceValuation 8.7/20 · P/E 48.4× · PEG 1.91 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 11.1/20 · RS sector −3.7% · RS bench −17.2% · 1Y 25.5% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 22.3 + 21.1 + 8.7 + 11.1 = 63.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 5Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 64% evidence60.0out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 24.1/35 · Revenue 44.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 20 pp · 62% evidenceCapital efficiency 14.3/25 · ROCE 12.5% · OPM 20.7% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.1/20 · P/E 54.9× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 11.5/20 · RS sector −2.2% · RS bench −17.8% · 1Y 78.1% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 24.1 + 14.3 + 10.1 + 11.5 = 60 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 6Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 85% evidence58.2out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 16.8/35 · Revenue 7.8% · PAT 35.6% · OPM change 3.1 pp · 95% evidenceCapital efficiency 20.1/25 · ROCE 29% · OPM 33.7% · 76% evidenceValuation 11.4/20 · P/E 45.9× · PEG 1.21 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 9.9/20 · RS sector 0.7% · RS bench −14.5% · 1Y 60.5% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 16.8 + 20.1 + 11.4 + 9.9 = 58.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 7Cohu, Inc.COHU · fading · mixed, leaning good · 64% evidence55.7out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 23.4/35 · Revenue 32.5% · PAT — · OPM change 15.4 pp · 62% evidenceCapital efficiency 4.8/25 · ROCE −2.9% · OPM 0.6% · 76% evidenceValuation 10.8/20 · P/E 27.1× · PEG — · 15% evidenceRelative strength 16.7/20 · RS sector 16.7% · RS bench −2.3% · 1Y 83.8% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 23.4 + 4.8 + 10.8 + 16.7 = 55.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. - 8FormFactor, Inc.FORM · fading · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence55.3out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 28.3/35 · Revenue 18.1% · PAT 100% · OPM change 17.8 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 15.8/25 · ROCE 12.7% · OPM 24.1% · 76% evidenceValuation 4.6/20 · P/E 88.3× · PEG 4.6 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 6.6/20 · RS sector −6.7% · RS bench −21.7% · 1Y 63.1% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 28.3 + 15.8 + 4.6 + 6.6 = 55.3 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is −6.7% and the one-year return is 63.1%. - 9Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence54.8out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 24.8/35 · Revenue 17.9% · PAT 82.9% · OPM change 4.4 pp · 83% evidenceCapital efficiency 12.4/25 · ROCE 8.5% · OPM 10.5% · 76% evidenceValuation 14.8/20 · P/E 38.5× · PEG 0.68 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 2.8/20 · RS sector −27% · RS bench −37.5% · 1Y 2.5% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 24.8 + 12.4 + 14.8 + 2.8 = 54.8 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is −27% and the one-year return is 2.5%. - 10Photronics, Inc.PLAB · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 85% evidence53.9out of 100
How the score adds up
Growth & earnings 14.2/35 · Revenue 1.3% · PAT 51.4% · OPM change −1.8 pp · 95% evidenceCapital efficiency 15.2/25 · ROCE 10.9% · OPM 21.1% · 76% evidenceValuation 16.0/20 · P/E 10.8× · PEG 0.43 · 65% evidenceRelative strength 8.5/20 · RS sector −14.7% · RS bench −24.7% · 1Y 26.1% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks aheadExact sum: 14.2 + 15.2 + 16 + 8.5 = 53.9 · What this means: The valuation scores well, but earnings are not improving yet, so the business does not back up the low multiple so far. - 11Qnity Electronics, Inc.Q · quiet · mixed, leaning good · 65% evidence53.2out of 100
- 12Entegris, Inc.ENTG · fading · mixed, leaning good · 81% evidence52.9out of 100
- 13InTest CorporationINTT · turning · mixed, leaning good · 64% evidence52.5out of 100
- 14AXT, Inc.AXTI · fading · mixed, leaning good · 64% evidence51.0out of 100
- 15IPG Photonics CorporationIPGP · basing · mixed, leaning weak · 74% evidence49.3out of 100
- 16Ambarella, Inc.AMBA · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 67% evidence49.3out of 100
- 17Amtech Systems, Inc.ASYS · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 64% evidence44.8out of 100
- 18Nova Ltd.NVMI · basing · mixed, leaning weak · 81% evidence44.4out of 100
- 19Onto Innovation Inc.ONTO · quiet · provisional · 56% evidence41.0out of 100
- 20Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR · fading · mixed, leaning weak · 64% evidence40.6out of 100
- 21ACM Research, Inc.ACMR · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 81% evidence39.5out of 100
- 22Camtek Ltd.CAMT · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 81% evidence38.5out of 100
- 23Veeco Instruments Inc.VECO · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 81% evidence37.7out of 100
- 24Axcelis Technologies, Inc.ACLS · quiet · mixed, leaning weak · 81% evidence37.3out of 100
- 25Ichor Holdings, Ltd.ICHR · quiet · weak · 64% evidence34.7out of 100
- 26Daqo New Energy Corp.DQ · quiet · weak · 64% evidence34.3out of 100
- 27Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.UCTT · quiet · weak · 64% evidence34.1out of 100
Ranked last: too little evidence (2 companies)
Under 60% of the evidence behind these scores is available, so they rank after every company above, whatever the score.
- 28Trio-Tech InternationalTRT · provisional · 0% evidence50.0out of 100
- 29Atomera IncorporatedATOM · quiet · provisional · 49% evidence38.3out of 100
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
How have Semiconductor Equipment & Materials share prices moved?
AXT, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials at +402.5%. Entegris, Inc. leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at +4.5%. 2 of 29 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 4 November 2026.
Price and relative strength
Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Semiconductor Equipment & Materials itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
1Y
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
52 weekly closes
- AXT, Inc. 455
- Aehr Test Systems, Inc. 299
- Ichor Holdings, 230
- Cohu, Inc. 199
- InTest Corporation 186
- S&P 500 114
| Week ending | AXT, Inc. | Aehr Test Systems, Inc. | Ichor Holdings, | Cohu, Inc. | InTest Corporation | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2025 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 86 | 100 | 101 | 100 | 100 | 98 |
| 28 Nov 2025 | 103 | 113 | 115 | 110 | 107 | 102 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 111 | 122 | 120 | 113 | 104 | 102 |
| 12 Dec 2025 | 142 | 120 | 122 | 108 | 100 | 102 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 140 | 107 | 120 | 107 | 97 | 101 |
| 26 Dec 2025 | 147 | 106 | 129 | 106 | 100 | 103 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 161 | 109 | 139 | 111 | 100 | 102 |
| 9 Jan 2026 | 220 | 129 | 162 | 122 | 104 | 103 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 212 | 142 | 203 | 128 | 115 | 103 |
| 23 Jan 2026 | 167 | 138 | 215 | 128 | 118 | 103 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 178 | 126 | 207 | 129 | 121 | 103 |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 231 | 130 | 220 | 140 | 132 | 103 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 232 | 142 | 320 | 139 | 139 | 102 |
| 20 Feb 2026 | 284 | 165 | 344 | 143 | 132 | 103 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 363 | 184 | 325 | 137 | 155 | 102 |
| 6 Mar 2026 | 310 | 175 | 273 | 125 | 176 | 100 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 468 | 175 | 283 | 123 | 185 | 99 |
| 20 Mar 2026 | 520 | 170 | 320 | 134 | 186 | 97 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 581 | 160 | 309 | 136 | 186 | 94 |
| 3 Apr 2026 | 506 | 218 | 329 | 146 | 187 | 98 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 615 | 346 | 393 | 169 | 210 | 101 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | 791 | 412 | 449 | 187 | 211 | 106 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 730 | 472 | 485 | 212 | 244 | 106 |
| 1 May 2026 | 920 | 458 | 440 | 206 | 247 | 107 |
| 8 May 2026 | 1,115 | 478 | 508 | 224 | 229 | 110 |
| 15 May 2026 | 1,186 | 489 | 501 | 213 | 245 | 110 |
| 22 May 2026 | 1,349 | 467 | 471 | 211 | 249 | 111 |
| 29 May 2026 | 988 | 454 | 489 | 239 | 223 | 113 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 853 | 484 | 430 | 226 | 195 | 110 |
| 12 Jun 2026 | 931 | 533 | 593 | 278 | 231 | 110 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 810 | 567 | 674 | 314 | 249 | 111 |
| 26 Jun 2026 | 672 | 451 | 642 | 290 | 220 | 109 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 542 | 344 | 671 | 268 | 208 | 111 |
| 10 Jul 2026 | 548 | 357 | 685 | 254 | 200 | 112 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 439 | 399 | 566 | 232 | 178 | 111 |
| 24 Jul 2026 | 452 | 375 | 591 | 230 | 183 | 110 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 579 | 393 | 514 | 217 | 164 | 111 |
| 7 Aug 2026 | 849 | 507 | 467 | 239 | 186 | 115 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 782 | 659 | 485 | 268 | 185 | 116 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | 678 | 500 | 411 | 246 | 155 | 114 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 562 | 397 | 379 | 217 | 147 | 115 |
| 4 Sep 2026 | 590 | 424 | 385 | 230 | 148 | 115 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 620 | 466 | 392 | 258 | 152 | 114 |
| 18 Sep 2026 | 671 | 460 | 374 | 261 | 143 | 113 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 756 | 513 | 396 | 303 | 153 | 115 |
| 2 Oct 2026 | 823 | 527 | 430 | 333 | 163 | 115 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 656 | 416 | 409 | 309 | 193 | 116 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 493 | 298 | 288 | 230 | 170 | 114 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 499 | 272 | 259 | 217 | 182 | 113 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 527 | 270 | 266 | 230 | 190 | 113 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 455 | 299 | 230 | 199 | 186 | 114 |
3Y
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
156 weekly closes, every 2nd shown
- Aehr Test Systems, Inc. 241
- Ichor Holdings, 134
- Cohu, Inc. 135
- InTest Corporation 182
- S&P 500 170
| Week ending | Aehr Test Systems, Inc. | Ichor Holdings, | Cohu, Inc. | InTest Corporation | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Nov 2023 | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | 100 |
| 24 Nov 2023 | 99 | 105 | 100 | – | 101 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 103 | 108 | 101 | – | 102 |
| 22 Dec 2023 | 112 | 134 | 109 | – | 105 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 89 | 128 | 101 | – | 104 |
| 19 Jan 2024 | 66 | 143 | 104 | – | 107 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 60 | 150 | 98 | – | 110 |
| 16 Feb 2024 | 70 | 179 | 99 | – | 111 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 70 | 175 | 101 | – | 114 |
| 15 Mar 2024 | 56 | 147 | 96 | – | 113 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 49 | 154 | 102 | – | 116 |
| 12 Apr 2024 | 46 | 155 | 96 | – | 113 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 46 | 156 | 95 | – | 113 |
| 10 May 2024 | 44 | 151 | 90 | – | 116 |
| 24 May 2024 | 46 | 154 | 97 | – | 117 |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 52 | 148 | 96 | – | 119 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 43 | 146 | 98 | – | 121 |
| 5 Jul 2024 | 45 | 161 | 103 | – | 123 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 76 | 142 | 97 | – | 122 |
| 2 Aug 2024 | 57 | 116 | 82 | – | 118 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 58 | 126 | 79 | – | 123 |
| 30 Aug 2024 | 60 | 123 | 82 | – | 125 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 51 | 116 | 77 | – | 125 |
| 27 Sep 2024 | 53 | 127 | 80 | – | 127 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 64 | 118 | 78 | – | 129 |
| 25 Oct 2024 | 67 | 110 | 79 | – | 129 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 48 | 134 | 87 | – | 133 |
| 22 Nov 2024 | 48 | 133 | 82 | – | 132 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 46 | 133 | 81 | – | 135 |
| 20 Dec 2024 | 57 | 118 | 77 | – | 131 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 69 | 131 | 82 | – | 131 |
| 17 Jan 2025 | 49 | 123 | 75 | – | 133 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 45 | 109 | 70 | – | 134 |
| 14 Feb 2025 | 43 | 125 | 65 | – | 135 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 38 | 116 | 60 | – | 132 |
| 14 Mar 2025 | 37 | 106 | 52 | – | 125 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 31 | 92 | 46 | – | 123 |
| 11 Apr 2025 | 34 | 69 | 44 | – | 118 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 35 | 85 | 52 | – | 122 |
| 9 May 2025 | 34 | 68 | 50 | – | 125 |
| 23 May 2025 | 35 | 65 | 52 | – | 129 |
| 6 Jun 2025 | 45 | 72 | 56 | – | 133 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 44 | 68 | 56 | – | 132 |
| 4 Jul 2025 | 62 | 90 | 63 | – | 139 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 60 | 90 | 60 | 95 | 139 |
| 1 Aug 2025 | 67 | 77 | 59 | 92 | 138 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 73 | 71 | 61 | 89 | 143 |
| 29 Aug 2025 | 99 | 67 | 61 | 91 | 143 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 105 | 67 | 63 | 95 | 146 |
| 26 Sep 2025 | 120 | 69 | 63 | 107 | 147 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 93 | 73 | 61 | 107 | 145 |
| 24 Oct 2025 | 99 | 89 | 70 | 113 | 150 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 97 | 60 | 73 | 100 | 149 |
| 21 Nov 2025 | 80 | 59 | 68 | 98 | 146 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 98 | 70 | 77 | 103 | 152 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | 87 | 70 | 72 | 95 | 151 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 88 | 81 | 75 | 98 | 152 |
| 16 Jan 2026 | 114 | 118 | 87 | 113 | 153 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 102 | 121 | 87 | 119 | 154 |
| 13 Feb 2026 | 114 | 186 | 94 | 137 | 151 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 148 | 189 | 93 | 152 | 152 |
| 13 Mar 2026 | 141 | 165 | 83 | 182 | 147 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 129 | 180 | 92 | 183 | 141 |
| 10 Apr 2026 | 279 | 229 | 114 | 206 | 151 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 380 | 282 | 144 | 239 | 158 |
| 8 May 2026 | 386 | 296 | 152 | 225 | 164 |
| 22 May 2026 | 377 | 274 | 143 | 244 | 165 |
| 5 Jun 2026 | 390 | 250 | 153 | 191 | 164 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 457 | 392 | 213 | 245 | 166 |
| 3 Jul 2026 | 277 | 390 | 182 | 204 | 165 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 321 | 329 | 157 | 175 | 165 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 317 | 299 | 147 | 161 | 166 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 532 | 282 | 182 | 182 | 172 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 320 | 220 | 147 | 144 | 171 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 376 | 228 | 175 | 149 | 170 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | 414 | 230 | 205 | 151 | 171 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 336 | 238 | 209 | 190 | 173 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 219 | 151 | 147 | 179 | 169 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 241 | 134 | 135 | 182 | 170 |
5Y
Price of the 5 strongest one-year movers, each started at 100
260 weekly closes, every 4th shown
- AXT, Inc. 540
- Aehr Test Systems, Inc. 311
- Ichor Holdings, 69
- Cohu, Inc. 120
- InTest Corporation 182
- S&P 500 164
| Week ending | AXT, Inc. | Aehr Test Systems, Inc. | Ichor Holdings, | Cohu, Inc. | InTest Corporation | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2021 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | 100 |
| 10 Dec 2021 | 94 | 79 | 91 | 97 | – | 100 |
| 7 Jan 2022 | 96 | 82 | 90 | 98 | – | 99 |
| 4 Feb 2022 | 80 | 62 | 84 | 85 | – | 96 |
| 4 Mar 2022 | 79 | 61 | 65 | 76 | – | 92 |
| 1 Apr 2022 | 78 | 51 | 69 | 78 | – | 97 |
| 29 Apr 2022 | 67 | 39 | 59 | 72 | – | 88 |
| 27 May 2022 | 66 | 44 | 63 | 83 | – | 89 |
| 24 Jun 2022 | 70 | 41 | 56 | 76 | – | 83 |
| 22 Jul 2022 | 76 | 59 | 61 | 78 | – | 84 |
| 19 Aug 2022 | 104 | 87 | 71 | 79 | – | 90 |
| 16 Sep 2022 | 88 | 80 | 57 | 74 | – | 82 |
| 14 Oct 2022 | 49 | 76 | 45 | 72 | – | 76 |
| 11 Nov 2022 | 60 | 126 | 60 | 100 | – | 85 |
| 9 Dec 2022 | 56 | 125 | 60 | 94 | – | 84 |
| 6 Jan 2023 | 55 | 117 | 60 | 92 | – | 83 |
| 3 Feb 2023 | 74 | 183 | 73 | 102 | – | 88 |
| 3 Mar 2023 | 49 | 165 | 67 | 103 | – | 86 |
| 31 Mar 2023 | 45 | 159 | 67 | 104 | – | 87 |
| 28 Apr 2023 | 30 | 127 | 57 | 92 | – | 89 |
| 26 May 2023 | 42 | 168 | 66 | 105 | – | 90 |
| 23 Jun 2023 | 37 | 204 | 72 | 107 | – | 92 |
| 21 Jul 2023 | 34 | 247 | 72 | 109 | – | 96 |
| 18 Aug 2023 | 27 | 207 | 69 | 96 | – | 93 |
| 15 Sep 2023 | 26 | 241 | 62 | 95 | – | 95 |
| 13 Oct 2023 | 26 | 198 | 60 | 94 | – | 92 |
| 10 Nov 2023 | 23 | 125 | 48 | 85 | – | 94 |
| 8 Dec 2023 | 26 | 132 | 55 | 89 | – | 98 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | 28 | 115 | 66 | 90 | – | 100 |
| 2 Feb 2024 | 29 | 77 | 77 | 87 | – | 105 |
| 1 Mar 2024 | 49 | 90 | 90 | 89 | – | 109 |
| 29 Mar 2024 | 52 | 63 | 79 | 91 | – | 112 |
| 26 Apr 2024 | 34 | 59 | 80 | 84 | – | 108 |
| 24 May 2024 | 39 | 60 | 79 | 86 | – | 113 |
| 21 Jun 2024 | 41 | 55 | 74 | 87 | – | 116 |
| 19 Jul 2024 | 38 | 97 | 72 | 86 | – | 117 |
| 16 Aug 2024 | 33 | 75 | 64 | 70 | – | 118 |
| 13 Sep 2024 | 27 | 66 | 59 | 68 | – | 120 |
| 11 Oct 2024 | 29 | 82 | 60 | 69 | – | 124 |
| 8 Nov 2024 | 23 | 61 | 69 | 77 | – | 128 |
| 6 Dec 2024 | 25 | 60 | 68 | 72 | – | 130 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | 26 | 88 | 67 | 73 | – | 126 |
| 31 Jan 2025 | 24 | 58 | 56 | 62 | – | 128 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | 18 | 49 | 60 | 53 | – | 127 |
| 28 Mar 2025 | 17 | 40 | 47 | 41 | – | 119 |
| 25 Apr 2025 | 16 | 45 | 43 | 46 | – | 117 |
| 23 May 2025 | 17 | 45 | 33 | 46 | – | 124 |
| 20 Jun 2025 | 21 | 57 | 35 | 49 | – | 127 |
| 18 Jul 2025 | 28 | 77 | 46 | 53 | 95 | 134 |
| 15 Aug 2025 | 23 | 94 | 37 | 54 | 89 | 137 |
| 12 Sep 2025 | 42 | 135 | 34 | 56 | 95 | 140 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 46 | 120 | 37 | 54 | 107 | 139 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | 107 | 125 | 30 | 65 | 100 | 143 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | 131 | 127 | 36 | 68 | 103 | 146 |
| 2 Jan 2026 | 190 | 113 | 42 | 67 | 98 | 146 |
| 30 Jan 2026 | 210 | 131 | 62 | 78 | 119 | 148 |
| 27 Feb 2026 | 430 | 191 | 97 | 82 | 152 | 146 |
| 27 Mar 2026 | 688 | 166 | 92 | 81 | 183 | 135 |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 865 | 490 | 144 | 128 | 239 | 152 |
| 22 May 2026 | 1,599 | 486 | 140 | 126 | 244 | 159 |
| 19 Jun 2026 | 960 | 590 | 200 | 189 | 245 | 159 |
| 17 Jul 2026 | 521 | 414 | 168 | 139 | 175 | 159 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 927 | 685 | 144 | 161 | 182 | 166 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | 735 | 484 | 117 | 155 | 149 | 163 |
| 9 Oct 2026 | 777 | 433 | 122 | 185 | 190 | 166 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 540 | 311 | 69 | 120 | 182 | 164 |
The companies with the strongest one-year price moves are drawn. The S&P 500 line is dashed.
Biggest one-year moves
- 1AXT, Inc.AXTI · $3.1B+402.5%1 year
- 2Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR · $2.0B+148.5%1 year
- 3Ichor Holdings, Ltd.ICHR · $1.3B+125.2%1 year
- 4Cohu, Inc.COHU · $2.1B+83.8%1 year
- 5InTest CorporationINTT · $178M+83.0%1 year
Strongest against S&P 500
- 1Entegris, Inc.ENTG · $21.8B+4.5%vs S&P 500
- 2InTest CorporationINTT · $178M+3.6%vs S&P 500
- 3Cohu, Inc.COHU · $2.1B−2.3%vs S&P 500
- 4ASML Holding N.V.ASML · $553.4B−6.1%vs S&P 500
- 5Qnity Electronics, Inc.Q · $24.9B−6.9%vs S&P 500
Strongest against the sector itself
- 1InTest CorporationINTT · $178M+22.2%vs sector
- 2Entegris, Inc.ENTG · $21.8B+21.1%vs sector
- 3Cohu, Inc.COHU · $2.1B+16.7%vs sector
- 4Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR · $2.0B+14.1%vs sector
- 5Qnity Electronics, Inc.Q · $24.9B+8.5%vs sector
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies have the most revenue, and which grow fastest?
ASML Holding N.V. has the highest Revenue among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at $39,474 million. Applied Materials, Inc. is next at $30,837 million. Teradyne, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 57.8%, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: ASML Holding N.V. is the largest at $39,474 million, 28% ahead of Applied Materials, Inc. Teradyne, Inc.'s growth is 57.8% from a $4,463 million base, with 17 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.
What this means: ASML Holding N.V. is the size to compare against; Teradyne, Inc. is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.
This conclusion weakens if: ASML Holding N.V.'s growth falls below Teradyne, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
Revenue, by reported quarter
- ASML Holding N.V. $11.7B
- Applied Materials, Inc. $9.1B
- Lam Research Corporation $8.2B
- KLA Corporation $4.1B
- Amkor Technology, Inc. $1.9B
| Quarter | ASML Holding N.V. | Applied Materials, Inc. | Lam Research Corporation | KLA Corporation | Amkor Technology, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | $5.2B | $6.1B | $4.2B | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| Mar 2022 | — | $6.3B | $4.1B | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| Jun 2022 | $3.5B | $6.2B | $4.6B | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| Sep 2022 | $5.4B | $6.5B | $5.1B | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Dec 2022 | $5.8B | $6.7B | $5.3B | $3.0B | $1.9B |
| Mar 2023 | — | $6.7B | $3.9B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Jun 2023 | $6.7B | $6.6B | $3.2B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Sep 2023 | $6.9B | $6.4B | $3.5B | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Dec 2023 | $6.7B | $6.7B | $3.8B | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Mar 2024 | $5.3B | $6.7B | $3.8B | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Jun 2024 | $6.2B | $6.6B | $3.9B | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Sep 2024 | $7.5B | $6.8B | $4.2B | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Dec 2024 | $9.3B | $7.0B | $4.4B | $3.1B | $1.6B |
| Mar 2025 | $7.7B | $7.2B | $4.7B | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Jun 2025 | $7.7B | $7.1B | $5.2B | $3.2B | $1.5B |
| Sep 2025 | $7.5B | $7.3B | $5.3B | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Dec 2025 | $9.7B | $6.8B | $5.3B | $3.3B | $1.9B |
| Mar 2026 | $8.8B | $7.0B | $5.8B | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Jun 2026 | $9.3B | $7.9B | $6.7B | $3.7B | $1.9B |
| Sep 2026 | $11.7B | $9.1B | $8.2B | $4.1B | — |
Revenue growth, by reported quarter
- ASML Holding N.V. 55%
- Applied Materials, Inc. 25%
- Lam Research Corporation 54%
- KLA Corporation 29%
- Amkor Technology, Inc. 26%
| Quarter | ASML Holding N.V. | Applied Materials, Inc. | Lam Research Corporation | KLA Corporation | Amkor Technology, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | — | — | 12% | 29% | 7.0% |
| Sep 2022 | 35% | 5.2% | 18% | 31% | 24% |
| Dec 2022 | 10% | 10% | 25% | 27% | 10% |
| Mar 2023 | — | 7.5% | −4.7% | 6.3% | −7.8% |
| Jun 2023 | 91% | 6.2% | −31% | −5.3% | −3.1% |
| Sep 2023 | 27% | −1.5% | −31% | −12% | −13% |
| Dec 2023 | 15% | −0.4% | −29% | −17% | −8.1% |
| Mar 2024 | — | −0.5% | −2.0% | −3.0% | −7.2% |
| Jun 2024 | −7.5% | 0.2% | 21% | 9.1% | 0.2% |
| Sep 2024 | 8.2% | 5.5% | 20% | 19% | 2.2% |
| Dec 2024 | 39% | 4.8% | 16% | 24% | −7.0% |
| Mar 2025 | 46% | 6.8% | 24% | 30% | −3.2% |
| Jun 2025 | 23% | 6.8% | 34% | 24% | 3.4% |
| Sep 2025 | 0.7% | 7.7% | 28% | 13% | 6.7% |
| Dec 2025 | 4.9% | −3.5% | 22% | 7.2% | 16% |
| Mar 2026 | 13% | −2.2% | 24% | 11% | 27% |
| Jun 2026 | 21% | 11% | 30% | 15% | 26% |
| Sep 2026 | 55% | 25% | 54% | 29% | — |
27 of 29 companies report revenue, 26 of 29 revenue growth. On every company-comparison chart on this page the five leaders are drawn, level and change on separate charts, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
Revenue · largest
- 1ASML Holding N.V.ASML$39.5B
- 2Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT$30.8B
- 3Lam Research CorporationLRCX$26.1B
- 4KLA CorporationKLAC$14.5B
- 5Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR$7.5B
Revenue growth · fastest growers
- 1Teradyne, Inc.TER58%
- 2AXT, Inc.AXTI47%
- 3Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC45%
- 4Lam Research CorporationLRCX33%
- 5Cohu, Inc.COHU33%
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | $11.7B | 55% | Sep 2026 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | $9.1B | 25% | Sep 2026 |
| Lam Research Corporation LRCX | $8.2B | 54% | Sep 2026 |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | $4.1B | 29% | Sep 2026 |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | $1.9B | 26% | Jun 2026 |
| Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | $1.4B | 22% | Jun 2026 |
| Teradyne, Inc. TER | $1.3B | 104% | Jun 2026 |
| Entegris, Inc. ENTG | $883M | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | $645M | 24% | Jun 2026 |
| Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | $343M | 35% | Jun 2026 |
| Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | $330M | 64% | Sep 2026 |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | $295M | 23% | Jun 2026 |
| ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | $293M | 36% | Jun 2026 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | $279M | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| FormFactor, Inc. FORM | $258M | 32% | Jun 2026 |
| Nova Ltd. NVMI | $255M | 16% | Jun 2026 |
| Photronics, Inc. PLAB | $216M | 2.9% | Sep 2026 |
| Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | $215M | 10% | Jun 2026 |
| Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | $193M | 16% | Jun 2026 |
| Cohu, Inc. COHU | $149M | 38% | Jun 2026 |
| Camtek Ltd. CAMT | $133M | 8.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | $108M | 13% | Sep 2026 |
| Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | $63M | −16% | Jun 2026 |
| AXT, Inc. AXTI | $48M | 167% | Jun 2026 |
| InTest Corporation INTT | $35M | 25% | Jun 2026 |
| Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | $22M | 10% | Jun 2026 |
| Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | $19M | 36% | Jun 2026 |
| Atomera Incorporated ATOM | $0M | −100% | Jun 2026 |
Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.
What to watch
Watch the next two reported quarters for growth persistence, margin conversion and whether the leader is gaining share without stretching working capital.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies keep the most from each $100 of sales?
KLA Corporation has the highest OPM among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 45%. ASML Holding N.V. is next at 44.4%. Atomera Incorporated has the highest Margin change at +79084.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 27 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: KLA Corporation leads opm at 45%; Atomera Incorporated leads margin change at +79084.1 percentage points.
What this means: KLA Corporation sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
OPM, by reported quarter
- KLA Corporation 45%
- ASML Holding N.V. 44%
- Lam Research Corporation 40%
- Applied Materials, Inc. 34%
- Teradyne, Inc. 33%
| Quarter | KLA Corporation | ASML Holding N.V. | Lam Research Corporation | Applied Materials, Inc. | Teradyne, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | 41% | 37% | 32% | 33% | 34% |
| Mar 2022 | 39% | — | 29% | 31% | — |
| Jun 2022 | 39% | 22% | 32% | 30% | 27% |
| Sep 2022 | 41% | 30% | 34% | 30% | 30% |
| Dec 2022 | 40% | 34% | 32% | 30% | 28% |
| Mar 2023 | 35% | — | 27% | 29% | — |
| Jun 2023 | 35% | 33% | 27% | 29% | 15% |
| Sep 2023 | 38% | 33% | 30% | 28% | 21% |
| Dec 2023 | 38% | 33% | 29% | 29% | 21% |
| Mar 2024 | 34% | 26% | 29% | 29% | 14% |
| Jun 2024 | 38% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 21% |
| Sep 2024 | 39% | 33% | 30% | 29% | 21% |
| Dec 2024 | 40% | 36% | 31% | 29% | 21% |
| Mar 2025 | 43% | 35% | 33% | 30% | 20% |
| Jun 2025 | 43% | 35% | 34% | 31% | 14% |
| Sep 2025 | 42% | 33% | 34% | 31% | 19% |
| Dec 2025 | 41% | 35% | 34% | 28% | 30% |
| Mar 2026 | 41% | 36% | 35% | 30% | 38% |
| Jun 2026 | 43% | 37% | 37% | 32% | 33% |
| Sep 2026 | 45% | 44% | 40% | 34% | — |
Margin change, by reported quarter
- KLA Corporation +3.3 pp
- ASML Holding N.V. +11.6 pp
- Lam Research Corporation +5.6 pp
- Applied Materials, Inc. +3.1 pp
- Teradyne, Inc. +18.9 pp
| Quarter | KLA Corporation | ASML Holding N.V. | Lam Research Corporation | Applied Materials, Inc. | Teradyne, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | +1.7 pp | — | +0.2 pp | — | — |
| Sep 2022 | +1.5 pp | −0.4 pp | +1.6 pp | −3.0 pp | −6.3 pp |
| Dec 2022 | −0.9 pp | −3.1 pp | +0.1 pp | −3.5 pp | −5.9 pp |
| Mar 2023 | −3.7 pp | — | −2.3 pp | −2.2 pp | — |
| Jun 2023 | −4.2 pp | +10.5 pp | −4.8 pp | −1.5 pp | −11.2 pp |
| Sep 2023 | −3.3 pp | +2.4 pp | −3.8 pp | −1.5 pp | −8.3 pp |
| Dec 2023 | −1.9 pp | −0.8 pp | −3.2 pp | −0.2 pp | −7.1 pp |
| Mar 2024 | −1.2 pp | — | +1.6 pp | +0.1 pp | — |
| Jun 2024 | +3.1 pp | −3.3 pp | +2.1 pp | 0.0 pp | +5.8 pp |
| Sep 2024 | +1.9 pp | −0.1 pp | +0.6 pp | +0.7 pp | −0.2 pp |
| Dec 2024 | +2.1 pp | +3.5 pp | +1.9 pp | −0.3 pp | +0.3 pp |
| Mar 2025 | +8.3 pp | +9.1 pp | +4.4 pp | +1.1 pp | +6.0 pp |
| Jun 2025 | +4.6 pp | +5.2 pp | +4.5 pp | +1.7 pp | −6.9 pp |
| Sep 2025 | +2.3 pp | +0.1 pp | +4.1 pp | +1.9 pp | −2.1 pp |
| Dec 2025 | +0.9 pp | −0.9 pp | +3.4 pp | −0.6 pp | +9.0 pp |
| Mar 2026 | −1.3 pp | +0.6 pp | +1.9 pp | −0.5 pp | +17.9 pp |
| Jun 2026 | −0.1 pp | +2.5 pp | +3.7 pp | +1.4 pp | +18.9 pp |
| Sep 2026 | +3.3 pp | +11.6 pp | +5.6 pp | +3.1 pp | — |
27 of 29 companies report OPM, 28 of 29 margin change.
OPM · highest
- 1KLA CorporationKLAC45%
- 2ASML Holding N.V.ASML44%
- 3Lam Research CorporationLRCX40%
- 4Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT34%
- 5Teradyne, Inc.TER33%
Margin change · fastest expanders
- 1Atomera IncorporatedATOM+79,084.1 pp
- 2AXT, Inc.AXTI+59.4 pp
- 3Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC+20.0 pp
- 4Teradyne, Inc.TER+18.9 pp
- 5FormFactor, Inc.FORM+17.8 pp
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLA Corporation KLAC | 45% | +3.3 pp | Sep 2026 |
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | 44% | +11.6 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Lam Research Corporation LRCX | 40% | +5.6 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | 34% | +3.1 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Teradyne, Inc. TER | 33% | +18.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Nova Ltd. NVMI | 30% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| FormFactor, Inc. FORM | 24% | +17.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | 23% | +1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | 22% | +1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| AXT, Inc. AXTI | 22% | +59.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Photronics, Inc. PLAB | 21% | −1.8 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | 21% | +20.0 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Camtek Ltd. CAMT | 20% | −5.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Entegris, Inc. ENTG | 19% | +4.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | 17% | +2.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | 11% | +4.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | 10% | +3.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | 9.4% | −5.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | 6.7% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | 5.9% | +4.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | 4.6% | +2.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | 2.8% | +4.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| InTest Corporation INTT | 1.1% | +3.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cohu, Inc. COHU | 0.6% | +15.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | −6.4% | +6.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | −7.5% | +15.5 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | −157% | −3.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Atomera Incorporated ATOM | −872% | +79,084.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current margin change rather than reversing it.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies earn the most profit?
ASML Holding N.V. has the highest Net profit among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at $13,475 million. Applied Materials, Inc. is next at $9,267 million. FormFactor, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: ASML Holding N.V. earns the most, $13,475 million of profit over the last 12 months, 45.4% above Applied Materials, Inc. FormFactor, Inc. shows at least 100% on the scoring scale (161.4% in full) growth from a profit base of $115 million. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.
What this means: ASML Holding N.V. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
Net profit, by reported quarter
- ASML Holding N.V. $5.0B
- Applied Materials, Inc. $2.5B
- Lam Research Corporation $2.8B
- KLA Corporation $1.5B
- Teradyne, Inc. $375M
| Quarter | ASML Holding N.V. | Applied Materials, Inc. | Lam Research Corporation | KLA Corporation | Teradyne, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $717M | $257M |
| Mar 2022 | — | $1.8B | $1.0B | $731M | — |
| Jun 2022 | $695M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $805M | $162M |
| Sep 2022 | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.0B | $198M |
| Dec 2022 | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $979M | $183M |
| Mar 2023 | — | $1.7B | $814M | $698M | — |
| Jun 2023 | $2.0B | $1.6B | $803M | $685M | $84M |
| Sep 2023 | $1.9B | $1.6B | $887M | $741M | $120M |
| Dec 2023 | $1.9B | $2.0B | $954M | $583M | $128M |
| Mar 2024 | $1.2B | $2.0B | $966M | $602M | $64M |
| Jun 2024 | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.0B | $836M | $186M |
| Sep 2024 | $2.1B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $946M | $146M |
| Dec 2024 | $2.7B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $825M | $146M |
| Mar 2025 | $2.4B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $99M |
| Jun 2025 | $2.3B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $78M |
| Sep 2025 | $2.1B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $120M |
| Dec 2025 | $2.8B | $1.9B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $257M |
| Mar 2026 | $2.8B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $399M |
| Jun 2026 | $2.9B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $375M |
| Sep 2026 | $5.0B | $2.5B | $2.8B | $1.5B | — |
Profit growth, by reported quarter
- ASML Holding N.V. 133%
- Applied Materials, Inc. 43%
- Lam Research Corporation 75%
- KLA Corporation 38%
- Teradyne, Inc. 381%
| Quarter | ASML Holding N.V. | Applied Materials, Inc. | Lam Research Corporation | KLA Corporation | Teradyne, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | — | — | 5.6% | 27% | — |
| Sep 2022 | 38% | −6.4% | 21% | −3.9% | −40% |
| Dec 2022 | −2.2% | −7.1% | 23% | 37% | −29% |
| Mar 2023 | — | −4.2% | −20% | −4.5% | — |
| Jun 2023 | 181% | 2.5% | −34% | −15% | −48% |
| Sep 2023 | 38% | −2.9% | −38% | −28% | −39% |
| Dec 2023 | 11% | 26% | −35% | −40% | −30% |
| Mar 2024 | — | 18% | 19% | −14% | — |
| Jun 2024 | −19% | 9.3% | 27% | 22% | 121% |
| Sep 2024 | 7.0% | 9.3% | 26% | 28% | 22% |
| Dec 2024 | 42% | −14% | 25% | 42% | 14% |
| Mar 2025 | 92% | −41% | 38% | 81% | 55% |
| Jun 2025 | 45% | 24% | 69% | 44% | −58% |
| Sep 2025 | 2.3% | 4.3% | 41% | 19% | −18% |
| Dec 2025 | 5.5% | 9.6% | 34% | 39% | 76% |
| Mar 2026 | 17% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 303% |
| Jun 2026 | 27% | 31% | 32% | 13% | 381% |
| Sep 2026 | 133% | 43% | 75% | 38% | — |
27 of 29 companies report net profit, 15 of 29 profit growth. The profit growth chart is drawn inside its usual range; a quarter far outside it (often a first quarter after listing or a near-zero base) is marked with an arrow at the edge, with its exact value in the hover card and the table.
Net profit · largest
- 1ASML Holding N.V.ASML$13.5B
- 2Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT$9.3B
- 3Lam Research CorporationLRCX$8.4B
- 4KLA CorporationKLAC$5.3B
- 5Teradyne, Inc.TER$1.2B
Profit growth · fastest growers
- 1FormFactor, Inc.FORM100%
- 2Teradyne, Inc.TER100%
- 3Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR83%
- 4Photronics, Inc.PLAB51%
- 5Lam Research CorporationLRCX45%
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | $5.0B | 133% | Sep 2026 |
| Lam Research Corporation LRCX | $2.8B | 75% | Sep 2026 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | $2.5B | 43% | Sep 2026 |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | $1.5B | 38% | Sep 2026 |
| Teradyne, Inc. TER | $375M | 381% | Jun 2026 |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | $174M | 222% | Jun 2026 |
| Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | $124M | −34% | Jun 2026 |
| Entegris, Inc. ENTG | $94M | 77% | Jun 2026 |
| ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | $89M | 197% | Jun 2026 |
| Nova Ltd. NVMI | $75M | 10% | Jun 2026 |
| Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | $60M | 76% | Jun 2026 |
| Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | $57M | −93% | Sep 2026 |
| FormFactor, Inc. FORM | $56M | 522% | Jun 2026 |
| Photronics, Inc. PLAB | $29M | 26% | Sep 2026 |
| Camtek Ltd. CAMT | $23M | −32% | Jun 2026 |
| Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | $23M | −26% | Jun 2026 |
| Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | $12M | 0.0% | Jun 2026 |
| AXT, Inc. AXTI | $11M | −500% | Jun 2026 |
| Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | $9M | −119% | Jun 2026 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | $5M | −29% | Jun 2026 |
| Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | $2M | −3,300% | Jun 2026 |
| Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | $1M | −300% | Jun 2026 |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | $1M | −186% | Jun 2026 |
| Cohu, Inc. COHU | $0M | −264% | Jun 2026 |
| InTest Corporation INTT | $0M | −50% | Jun 2026 |
| Atomera Incorporated ATOM | −$6M | — | Jun 2026 |
| Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | −$7M | −2,100% | Sep 2026 |
| Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | −$112M | −432% | Jun 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current profit growth rather than reversing it.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies earn the best return on capital?
Lam Research Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 50.7%. ASML Holding N.V. is next at 44.7%. Atomera Incorporated has the highest ROCE change at +33.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 28 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: Lam Research Corporation leads ROCE at 50.7%, 6 percentage points above ASML Holding N.V. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.
What this means: Lam Research Corporation sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
ROCE, by reported quarter
- Lam Research Corporation 51%
- ASML Holding N.V. 45%
- KLA Corporation 45%
- Teradyne, Inc. 37%
- Applied Materials, Inc. 29%
| Quarter | Lam Research Corporation | ASML Holding N.V. | KLA Corporation | Teradyne, Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | 41% | 34% | 36% | 38% | 37% |
| Mar 2022 | 42% | — | 37% | — | 41% |
| Jun 2022 | 43% | 35% | 38% | 41% | 42% |
| Sep 2022 | 42% | 36% | 40% | 39% | 40% |
| Dec 2022 | 41% | 36% | 41% | 36% | 40% |
| Mar 2023 | 40% | — | 40% | — | 38% |
| Jun 2023 | 36% | 44% | 39% | 29% | 37% |
| Sep 2023 | 32% | 37% | 37% | 25% | 35% |
| Dec 2023 | 28% | 41% | 36% | 22% | 33% |
| Mar 2024 | 29% | 34% | 33% | 18% | 31% |
| Jun 2024 | 30% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 31% |
| Sep 2024 | 32% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 30% |
| Dec 2024 | 33% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 30% |
| Mar 2025 | 37% | 38% | 41% | 20% | 32% |
| Jun 2025 | 40% | 43% | 42% | 18% | 33% |
| Sep 2025 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 18% | 33% |
| Dec 2025 | 46% | 43% | 42% | 23% | 30% |
| Mar 2026 | 48% | 42% | 42% | 31% | 28% |
| Jun 2026 | 47% | 45% | 42% | 37% | 28% |
| Sep 2026 | 51% | 45% | 45% | — | 29% |
ROCE change, by reported quarter
- Lam Research Corporation +8.1 pp
- ASML Holding N.V. +1.3 pp
- KLA Corporation +2.1 pp
- Teradyne, Inc. +19.1 pp
- Applied Materials, Inc. −3.8 pp
| Quarter | Lam Research Corporation | ASML Holding N.V. | KLA Corporation | Teradyne, Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sep 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 2022 | +0.6 pp | +1.8 pp | +5.1 pp | −1.8 pp | +2.9 pp |
| Mar 2023 | −2.2 pp | — | +3.4 pp | — | −2.9 pp |
| Jun 2023 | −6.3 pp | +8.8 pp | +1.1 pp | −12.1 pp | −5.2 pp |
| Sep 2023 | −9.4 pp | +1.5 pp | −2.9 pp | −13.5 pp | −5.8 pp |
| Dec 2023 | −13.6 pp | +5.3 pp | −4.4 pp | −14.3 pp | −7.4 pp |
| Mar 2024 | −10.6 pp | — | −7.3 pp | — | −6.3 pp |
| Jun 2024 | −6.3 pp | −11.8 pp | −4.9 pp | −11.6 pp | −6.3 pp |
| Sep 2024 | −0.3 pp | −5.9 pp | −1.2 pp | −8.8 pp | −5.1 pp |
| Dec 2024 | +5.5 pp | −9.8 pp | +1.8 pp | −4.2 pp | −2.5 pp |
| Mar 2025 | +7.2 pp | +3.6 pp | +8.0 pp | +2.1 pp | +0.2 pp |
| Jun 2025 | +9.9 pp | +11.0 pp | +8.1 pp | +0.5 pp | +2.0 pp |
| Sep 2025 | +10.5 pp | +12.1 pp | +7.2 pp | +1.6 pp | +3.3 pp |
| Dec 2025 | +12.5 pp | +11.4 pp | +3.8 pp | +5.0 pp | −0.2 pp |
| Mar 2026 | +11.3 pp | +4.3 pp | +0.5 pp | +10.9 pp | −3.3 pp |
| Jun 2026 | +6.7 pp | +1.9 pp | −0.3 pp | +19.1 pp | −4.4 pp |
| Sep 2026 | +8.1 pp | +1.3 pp | +2.1 pp | — | −3.8 pp |
28 of 29 companies report ROCE, 28 of 29 ROCE change.
ROCE · highest
- 1Lam Research CorporationLRCX51%
- 2ASML Holding N.V.ASML45%
- 3KLA CorporationKLAC45%
- 4Teradyne, Inc.TER37%
- 5Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT29%
ROCE change · fastest improvers
- 1Atomera IncorporatedATOM+33.9 pp
- 2Teradyne, Inc.TER+19.1 pp
- 3Amtech Systems, Inc.ASYS+14.2 pp
- 4AXT, Inc.AXTI+11.1 pp
- 5FormFactor, Inc.FORM+8.7 pp
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lam Research Corporation LRCX | 51% | +8.1 pp | Sep 2026 |
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | 45% | +1.3 pp | Sep 2026 |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | 45% | +2.1 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Teradyne, Inc. TER | 37% | +19.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | 29% | −3.8 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Nova Ltd. NVMI | 18% | −2.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| FormFactor, Inc. FORM | 13% | +8.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | 13% | +2.3 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Photronics, Inc. PLAB | 11% | −2.5 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Camtek Ltd. CAMT | 10% | −4.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | 8.8% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | 8.5% | +1.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | 7.5% | −6.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Entegris, Inc. ENTG | 7.1% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | 6.4% | −5.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | 5.3% | −5.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | 5.1% | +14.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | 4.2% | −1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | 2.5% | −3.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| InTest Corporation INTT | 2.1% | +1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | 1.7% | +2.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| AXT, Inc. AXTI | 0.4% | +11.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | 0.3% | +1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cohu, Inc. COHU | −2.9% | +5.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | −4.9% | +2.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | −6.2% | −3.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | −9.7% | +7.3 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Atomera Incorporated ATOM | −62% | +33.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current roce change rather than reversing it.
How are Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks valued against growth and quality?
Photronics, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies compared here, at 0.43×. IPG Photonics Corporation is next at 0.65×. Aehr Test Systems, Inc. has the lowest P/E at −407.5×, so level and change sit with different companies. 15 of 29 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.
What the numbers say: Photronics, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43×, 33.8% below IPG Photonics Corporation. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.
What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
PEG, by reported quarter
- Photronics, Inc. 0.4
- IPG Photonics Corporation 0.7
- Veeco Instruments Inc. 0.7
- Amkor Technology, Inc. 0.7
- Camtek 0.8
| Quarter | Photronics, Inc. | IPG Photonics Corporation | Veeco Instruments Inc. | Amkor Technology, Inc. | Camtek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jun 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sep 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 2022 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2023 | — | — | — | — | 1.0 |
| Jun 2023 | 0.2 | — | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sep 2023 | 0.9 | — | 1.3 | — | 2.9 |
| Dec 2023 | 1.8 | — | — | — | — |
| Mar 2024 | 0.6 | — | — | — | 5.6 |
| Jun 2024 | 1.6 | 0.7 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sep 2024 | 0.6 | — | 0.7 | — | 1.1 |
| Dec 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0.6 |
| Mar 2025 | 1.8 | — | — | — | 0.5 |
| Jun 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0.8 |
| Sep 2025 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 2025 | 1.1 | — | — | 4.7 | — |
| Mar 2026 | — | — | — | 0.7 | — |
| Jun 2026 | 0.4 | — | — | — | — |
| Sep 2026 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E, by reported quarter
- Photronics, Inc. 10.8×
- IPG Photonics Corporation 180.7×
- Veeco Instruments Inc. 199.0×
- Amkor Technology, Inc. 38.5×
- Camtek 202.1×
| Quarter | Photronics, Inc. | IPG Photonics Corporation | Veeco Instruments Inc. | Amkor Technology, Inc. | Camtek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2021 | 14.3× | 33.0× | 55.2× | 9.4× | 33.5× |
| Mar 2022 | 15.0× | 20.8× | 37.3× | 7.7× | 20.5× |
| Jun 2022 | 10.6× | 18.3× | 24.7× | 6.0× | 15.9× |
| Sep 2022 | 14.5× | 15.8× | 20.4× | 5.1× | 14.4× |
| Dec 2022 | 8.4× | — | 5.7× | 7.7× | 12.2× |
| Mar 2023 | 10.6× | 58.5× | 6.7× | 10.0× | 16.0× |
| Jun 2023 | 7.4× | 60.7× | — | 12.6× | 20.3× |
| Sep 2023 | 13.9× | 56.9× | 20.6× | 13.7× | 35.0× |
| Dec 2023 | 9.2× | 23.3× | −57.6× | 22.7× | 39.6× |
| Mar 2024 | 13.7× | 22.9× | −114.8× | 21.2× | 43.9× |
| Jun 2024 | 13.4× | 27.3× | 31.9× | 26.2× | 59.1× |
| Sep 2024 | 11.5× | — | 23.4× | 20.6× | 34.1× |
| Dec 2024 | 11.1× | −17.3× | 20.6× | 17.9× | 30.9× |
| Mar 2025 | 9.9× | −13.3× | 18.2× | 14.1× | 20.9× |
| Jun 2025 | 10.2× | −13.6× | 20.1× | 17.1× | 28.8× |
| Sep 2025 | 11.0× | 130.4× | 37.2× | 22.8× | — |
| Dec 2025 | 10.3× | 97.0× | 48.6× | 26.1× | 96.0× |
| Mar 2026 | 15.0× | 167.2× | — | 25.5× | 146.9× |
| Jun 2026 | 18.6× | 180.7× | 199.0× | 38.5× | 202.1× |
| Sep 2026 | 10.8× | — | — | — | — |
15 of 29 companies report PEG, 27 of 29 P/E.
PEG · lowest PEG
- 1Photronics, Inc.PLAB0.4
- 2IPG Photonics CorporationIPGP0.7
- 3Veeco Instruments Inc.VECO0.7
- 4Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR0.7
- 5Camtek Ltd.CAMT0.8
P/E · lowest P/E
- 1Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR−407.5×
- 2Ambarella, Inc.AMBA−229.3×
- 3Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.UCTT−227.6×
- 4Ichor Holdings, Ltd.ICHR−81.4×
- 5Photronics, Inc.PLAB10.8×
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nova Ltd. NVMI | 6.4 | 63.8× | Jun 2026 |
| FormFactor, Inc. FORM | 4.6 | 88.3× | Jun 2026 |
| ACM Research, Inc. ACMR | 2.2 | 58.4× | Jun 2026 |
| Entegris, Inc. ENTG | 1.9 | 80.6× | Jun 2026 |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | 1.9 | 48.4× | Sep 2026 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT | 1.2 | 45.9× | Sep 2026 |
| Axcelis Technologies, Inc. ACLS | 1.1 | 62.8× | Jun 2026 |
| Teradyne, Inc. TER | 1.0 | 59.5× | Jun 2026 |
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | 1.0 | 43.3× | Sep 2026 |
| Lam Research Corporation LRCX | 1.0 | 46.7× | Sep 2026 |
| Onto Innovation Inc. ONTO | 0.9 | 142.0× | Jun 2026 |
| Camtek Ltd. CAMT | 0.8 | 202.1× | Jun 2026 |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. AMKR | 0.7 | 38.5× | Jun 2026 |
| Veeco Instruments Inc. VECO | 0.7 | 199.0× | Jun 2026 |
| IPG Photonics Corporation IPGP | 0.7 | 180.7× | Jun 2026 |
| Photronics, Inc. PLAB | 0.4 | 10.8× | Sep 2026 |
| Aehr Test Systems, Inc. AEHR | 0.3 | −407.5× | Jun 2026 |
| Daqo New Energy Corp. DQ | 0.1 | 11.1× | Jun 2026 |
| Qnity Electronics, Inc. Q | — | 58.3× | Jun 2026 |
| Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. KLIC | — | 54.9× | Sep 2026 |
| AXT, Inc. AXTI | — | 1,186.4× | Jun 2026 |
| Ambarella, Inc. AMBA | — | −229.3× | Sep 2026 |
| Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. UCTT | — | −227.6× | Jun 2026 |
| Cohu, Inc. COHU | — | 27.1× | Jun 2026 |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. ICHR | — | −81.4× | Jun 2026 |
| Amtech Systems, Inc. ASYS | — | 100.9× | Jun 2026 |
| InTest Corporation INTT | — | 144.4× | Jun 2026 |
What to watch
Watch whether the next two comparable periods confirm the current p/e rather than reversing it.
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 29 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 4 November 2026.
What else do people ask about Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks?
These 22 answers restate the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 29 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 4 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector outperforming S&P 500?
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has done better than the S&P 500 by 42.7% over 52 weeks, but is 28.1% behind over the last 13 weeks.
2 of 29 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet), and 8 of the 28 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is largest by revenue?
ASML Holding N.V. leads with revenue of $39,474 million, based on 27 of 29 comparable companies through Sep 2026.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is growing fastest?
Teradyne, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 57.8%, across 26 of 29 comparable companies.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
ASML Holding N.V. ranks first at 76.2 out of 100, with 85.3% of the evidence available. The score ranks published data; it is not a recommendation.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Photronics, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.43, among 15 of 29 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Semiconductor Equipment & Materials comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four parts add up directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or old evidence moves only that part toward the middle.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company is the biggest?
ASML Holding N.V. is the largest, with revenue of $39,474 million over the last 12 months, ahead of Applied Materials, Inc. at $30,837 million. That covers 27 of 29 companies with comparable reporting through Sep 2026.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the best profit margins?
KLA Corporation has the highest operating margin at 45%, from 27 of 29 comparable companies. Atomera Incorporated shows the biggest improvement (+79084.1 percentage points; the chart above shows the starting level). A high margin matters most when it is steady or rising, not when it is at a peak.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company makes the most profit?
ASML Holding N.V. earns the most, at $13,475 million of net profit over the last 12 months, from 27 of 29 comparable companies.
FormFactor, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at the 100% cap of the scoring scale, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company earns the highest return on capital?
Lam Research Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 50.7%, across 28 of 29 companies. A high return that repeats for years shows a lasting business, while a single high reading can come from a small capital base or one good year.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stock has the lowest PEG ratio?
On PEG (where a lower number means a lower price for what the company earns), Photronics, Inc. has the lowest at 0.43×. Only 15 of 29 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a ranking of the whole industry.
A low multiple is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.
Is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector beating the market?
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials has done better than the S&P 500 by 42.7% over the last 52 weeks, but is 28.1% behind over the last 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members.
Inside the sector, 2 of the 29 companies we track are beating the market on their own (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stock has the strongest price momentum?
Entegris, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against the S&P 500, meaning its share price has done best against the index. A price can move well before the business results back it up, and sometimes without them.
Which Semiconductor Equipment & Materials company has the highest 4-Factor score?
ASML Holding N.V. scores 76.2 out of 100, with 85.3% of the evidence available, from 25.6 points on growth and earnings, 21 on capital efficiency, 13.2 on valuation and 16.4 on relative strength. It ranks published data only; management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of the score.
How many Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
This comparison covers 29 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector?
The 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on this page carry $1,473,825 million of combined market value. ASML Holding N.V. is the largest at $553,362 million, about 38% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 4 November 2026.
What is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies on this page is 59.5×, measured on the 23 that report a comparable figure.
A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 4 November 2026.
How is the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials sector performing?
2 of the 29 Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies we track are doing better than the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Readings are as of 4 November 2026.
How many Semiconductor Equipment & Materials stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 29 listed Semiconductor Equipment & Materials companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list, nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing figures are never estimated, copied forward or swapped for a similar-looking line, and a company with missing evidence has its score pulled toward the middle rather than scored as bad.
Is this advice?
No, every figure here is worked out by code from company filings and market data, for research. It does not account for your situation and is not a substitute for advice from a registered adviser.
More lists
Every Sector Alpha list, grouped
Stock screens
Market lists
Themes
Sectors
US stocks
Every US industry against its index · What changed this week · Plain-text data
Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers · Fundamentals through Sep 2026 · Prices through 4 November 2026. Every ranking is worked out by code from reported figures. Missing values stay missing.
X · Instagram · YouTube · About · Newsletter · Newsletter archive
This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.