Nova Ltd.
NVMINova Ltd. is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 87th percentile of its own range says the market knows.
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 87th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.
The price is building a base (2 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 87th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +16.7% year on year, and 105% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Nova Ltd. trades at $414, building a base and 2 weeks into that stage. That is −4.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 49% of a 52-week range of $253 to $583. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (7 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is building a base — week 2 of stage 1. At $414 it trades −4.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 49% of its 52-week range ($253–$583).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,642% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Nova Ltd. trades at 51.9× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 34.4×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 51.9× is at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile), against a long-run median of 34.4× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +38.4% against a +56.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +51.6%/yr price move, ~+23.1%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+28.5 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Nova Ltd. reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: revenue growth has eased from +42.3% at its peak to +21.6% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 20.5%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +31.3% | +15.6% | — | — |
| Profit | +44.4% | +22.9% | — | — |
| EPS | +38.4% | +21.6% | — | — |
| Stock price | +56.9% | +51.6% | +32.5% | +43.5% |
4-Factor Sector Score
46.4/100 — rank 15 of 29 in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · 81% evidence confidence
Nova Ltd. scores 46.4 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, ranking 15. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.4 + 15.7 + 6.7 + 2.6 = 46.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Nova Ltd. reported $0.2 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +14.3% year on year. That is the 9th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 20.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.9 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.9 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.9 B (+31.3% on the year), capping 4 years at 20.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.2 B, +14.3% year on year — the 9th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +22.4% growth against the decade's 20.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +21.6% over the last 4 quarters against +31.6%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit +23.8% vs +36.3%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Nova Ltd.'s operating margin is 29.2% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 25.0% to 28.4%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 29.2%, +0.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 25.0%–28.4%, and FY25's 28.4% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +0.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +1.2 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Nova Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +16.7% year on year. It is the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is 30.4%. That is 29.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +16.7% year on year — the 9th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.3 B (+44.4%), and the 4-year compound rate is 30.4%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +14.3% and the margin +0.6 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +24.2% vs revenue +22.4%. Profit and revenue are moving roughly in step.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 105% of Nova Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.3 B of operating cash against $0.3 B of profit. After $0.0 B of capital spending, $0.2 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.3 B against reported profit of $0.3 B, leaving free cash of $0.2 B after $0.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 105% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Nova Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $0.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $0.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Nova Ltd. earns a ROE of 20% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 19% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +7.3 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 29.5% net margin on 0.37× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 20%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 19% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 29.5% net margin × 0.37× asset turns × 1.79× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 19.5% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 20.5% − 13.2% = a +7.3 pp spread. The 13.2% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend
Nova Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Nova Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Nova Ltd. carries total debt of $0.8 B against shareholder equity of $1.4 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.58. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.47 in FY21 to 0.61 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.8 B against shareholder equity of $1.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.58. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.47 (FY21) to 0.61 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Nova Ltd., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Nova Ltd.: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Teradyne, Inc.TER | 69.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 24.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 45% evidence | 18.4/25 ROCE 12.7% · OPM 36.9% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 59.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 5.5% · RS bench 40% · 1Y 275.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.3 + 18.4 + 10.1 + 16.8 = 69.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Applied Materials, Inc.AMAT | 68.2/100Favorable setup85% evidence | LEADER | 22.1/35 Revenue 3.3% · PAT 25.9% · OPM change 1.4 pp 95% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 31.9% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 39.2× · PEG 1.32 65% evidence | 18.6/20 RS sector 7.8% · RS bench 44.6% · 1Y 195.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 16.4 + 11.1 + 18.6 = 68.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Lam Research CorporationLRCX | 63.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 21.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.9 pp 45% evidence | 19.4/25 ROCE 15.5% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 65.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector -2.8% · RS bench 30.9% · 1Y 212.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 19.4 + 9.6 + 12.9 = 63.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4ACM Research, Inc.ACMR | 60.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.6/35 Revenue 19.7% · PAT -9% · OPM change 0.6 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 15.6% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 30× · PEG 0.75 65% evidence | 16.8/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench 38.8% · 1Y 244.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 11.8 + 14.7 + 16.8 = 60.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5ASML Holding N.V.ASML | 56.1/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | FADING | 22.6/35 Revenue 9.8% · PAT 13.5% · OPM change 2.5 pp 95% evidence | 17.5/25 ROCE 11% · OPM 37.1% 76% evidence | 4.7/20 P/E 63.3× · PEG 4.28 65% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -15.3% · RS bench 18.8% · 1Y 137%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.6 + 17.5 + 4.7 + 11.3 = 56.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 6Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.KLIC | 55.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 23.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 20 pp 45% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 15.9% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 61.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -4.9% · RS bench 26.7% · 1Y 165%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 12.6 + 9.8 + 9.4 = 55 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7FormFactor, Inc.FORM | 54.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.5 pp 45% evidence | 12.7/25 ROCE 5.2% · OPM 7.4% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 89.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.4/20 RS sector 1.3% · RS bench 30.9% · 1Y 320.9%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 12.7 + 9 + 10.4 = 54.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8KLA CorporationKLAC | 54.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.3 pp 45% evidence | 18.2/25 ROCE 12.1% · OPM 41.2% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 82.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.5/20 RS sector -15.5% · RS bench 16.9% · 1Y 113.7%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 18.2 + 9.2 + 10.5 = 54.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Cohu, Inc.COHU | 52.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 19.3 pp 45% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE 0% · OPM -8.9% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 60× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 5.2% · RS bench 41.2% · 1Y 172.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 5.4 + 9.9 + 17.4 = 52.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10AXT, Inc.AXTI | 51.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 47.2 pp 45% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM -5.9% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 3604× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 36.7% · RS bench 50.9% · 1Y 2950%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 7 + 8.5 + 13.7 = 51.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Aehr Test Systems, Inc.AEHR | 48.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -34.9 pp 45% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE -0.7% · OPM -41% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 12.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.6/20 RS sector 65.3% · RS bench 106.2% · 1Y 503.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 5 + 11.5 + 16.6 = 48.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Amkor Technology, Inc.AMKR | 48.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 6% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 38.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -23% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 141.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 12.5 + 10.8 + 4 = 48.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Amtech Systems, Inc.ASYS | 48.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 20.5/35 Revenue -13.2% · PAT — · OPM change 211.5 pp 62% evidence | 9.3/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 8.8% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 68.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.1/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench 19.9% · 1Y 259.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 9.3 + 9.3 + 9.1 = 48.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Ichor Holdings, Ltd.ICHR | 47.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 16.6/35 Revenue 7.6% · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 62% evidence | 5.8/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 0.8% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 48.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 20.6% · RS bench 48.4% · 1Y 308.7%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 5.8 + 10.4 + 14.2 = 47 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 48.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15Nova Ltd.this pageNVMI | 46.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT 24.6% · OPM change 0.5 pp 83% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 5.6% · OPM 30.1% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 54.1× · PEG 2.56 65% evidence | 2.6/20 RS sector -34.6% · RS bench -7.4% · 1Y 53%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 15.7 + 6.7 + 2.6 = 46.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Photronics, Inc.PLAB | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.4/35 Revenue 0.5% · PAT 24.1% · OPM change -6.3 pp 95% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 20.1% 76% evidence | 16.3/20 P/E 18.2× · PEG 0.43 65% evidence | 0.9/20 RS sector -36.1% · RS bench -9.2% · 1Y 61.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 13.8 + 16.3 + 0.9 = 45.4 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 17Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.UCTT | 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 12.9/35 Revenue -3.2% · PAT -574.4% · OPM change -0.4 pp 62% evidence | 6.6/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 2.1% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 35.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 11.3% · RS bench 40.5% · 1Y 264.4%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 6.6 + 10.9 + 13.9 = 44.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 40.5%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18Onto Innovation Inc.ONTO | 44.3/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 12.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -18.5 pp 39% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 5.2% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 59.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -5.6% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 179.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 9.9 + 10.2 + 11.3 = 44.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Ambarella, Inc.AMBA | 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 22.3/35 Revenue 27.8% · PAT — · OPM change 10.8 pp 71% evidence | 3.5/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -19.3% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 8.4/20 RS sector -34.4% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y 27.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 3.5 + 10 + 8.4 = 44.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 20InTest CorporationINTT | 44.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.5/35 Revenue -5.5% · PAT — · OPM change 13.6 pp 62% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 2.8% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 341.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -16.9% · RS bench 13.1% · 1Y 103.8%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 8.2 + 8.6 + 7.7 = 44 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Entegris, Inc.ENTG | 42.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue -0.3% · PAT -14.8% · OPM change 1.6 pp 83% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 17.4% 76% evidence | 7.7/20 P/E 67× · PEG 1.93 65% evidence | 9.5/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench 14.7% · 1Y 97.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 10.9 + 7.7 + 9.5 = 42.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 22Camtek Ltd.CAMT | 39.3/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.0/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT -61.7% · OPM change -5.2 pp 83% evidence | 13.5/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 22.4% 76% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 174.3× · PEG 0.8 65% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -29.6% · RS bench -0.7% · 1Y 82.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11 + 13.5 + 11.8 + 3 = 39.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 23IPG Photonics CorporationIPGP | 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.8/35 Revenue 9.2% · PAT — · OPM change -3.7 pp 62% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE -0.4% · OPM -2.9% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 166.1× · PEG 0.67 65% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -40.8% · RS bench -14% · 1Y 25%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 6.8 + 13 + 4.6 = 39.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Axcelis Technologies, Inc.ACLS | 38.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | FADING | 7.8/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT -44.1% · OPM change -11.1 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 4% 76% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 29× · PEG 1.16 65% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench 18.4% · 1Y 75.9%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.8 + 9.8 + 12.5 + 8.5 = 38.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 25Veeco Instruments Inc.VECO | 37.1/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | FADING | 6.8/35 Revenue -7.8% · PAT -64.1% · OPM change -10.2 pp 83% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -1.7% 76% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 89.1× · PEG 0.65 65% evidence | 9.4/20 RS sector -8.9% · RS bench 25% · 1Y 128%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.8 + 7.2 + 13.7 + 9.4 = 37.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 26Daqo New Energy Corp.DQ | 28.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 9.2/35 Revenue -22.8% · PAT — · OPM change -472.4 pp 62% evidence | 4.4/25 ROCE -2.6% · OPM -564.4% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 12.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -68.5% · RS bench -48.5% · 1Y -36.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.2 + 4.4 + 11.4 + 3 = 28 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Trio-Tech InternationalTRT | 53.0/100Thin evidence · provisional14% evidence | 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE — · OPM — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench 43.9% · 1Y 259.6%8 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 12.5 + 10 + 13 = 53 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Qnity Electronics, Inc.Q | 52.2/100Thin evidence · provisional38% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 45% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 4.2% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 45.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —7 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.7 + 15 + 10.5 + 10 = 52.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29Atomera IncorporatedATOM | 43.8/100Thin evidence · provisional43% evidence | FADING | 21.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 79084.1 pp 39% evidence | 4.9/25 ROCE -19.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.1/20 RS sector -20% · RS bench 6.9% · 1Y 60.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 4.9 + 10 + 7.1 = 43.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Nova Ltd.'s stock price today?
Nova Ltd. trades at $414, +56.9% over the past year. The company is valued at $13.0 B. The stock sits at 49% of its 52-week range of $253–$583, −4.2% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is building a base, 2 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Nova Ltd.'s latest quarterly results?
Nova Ltd. reported revenue of $0.2 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 14.3% and profit rose 16.7% year on year. Earnings per share were $2.04. The operating margin was 29.2%, 0.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s revenue?
Nova Ltd. reported revenue of $0.2 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +14.3% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.9 B (+31.3%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 20.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s profit?
Nova Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +16.7% year on year — the 9th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The operating margin ran 29.2% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s market cap?
Nova Ltd.'s market capitalisation is $13.0 B at a stock price of $414. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s P/E ratio?
Nova Ltd. trades at a P/E of 51.9×, at the 87th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 34.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Nova Ltd. pay a dividend?
No — Nova Ltd. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd. overvalued?
On its own history, Nova Ltd. looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 51.9× sits at the 87th percentile of its 4-year range (long-run median 34.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd. growing?
Yes — Nova Ltd. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +14.3% year on year, profit +16.7%, and the margin +0.6 pp at 29.2%. The 4-year compound rates are 20.3% (revenue) and 30.4% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Nova Ltd. performing?
Nova Ltd. is building a base, 2 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 14.3% and profit rose 16.7% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 7 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Nova Ltd. in?
Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: revenue growth has eased from +42.3% at its peak to +21.6% but is still expanding, ROCE holding at 20.5%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +21.6% latest, profit growth +23.8% latest, eps growth +21.1% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd. in an uptrend?
No — the price is building a base (week 2 of stage 1), trading −4.2% versus its 200-day average and at 49% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Nova Ltd. is currently behind the S&P 500 (7 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-18), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +3,642% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Nova Ltd.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Nova Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $414, the price is building a base 2 weeks in. Its P/E of 51.9× sits at the 87th percentile of its own 4-year range. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Nova Ltd. have too much debt?
It is moderate — Nova Ltd.'s debt-to-equity is 0.58. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s capex?
Nova Ltd. spent $0.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Nova Ltd.'s cash flow?
Nova Ltd. generated $0.3 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.2 B of free cash flow after $0.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.3 B, so operating cash ran behind profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 105% of Nova Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.3 B against reported profit of $0.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Nova Ltd. in its business cycle?
Nova Ltd.'s FY25 operating margin was 28.4%, against a 5-year band of 25.0%–28.4%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 29.2%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Nova Ltd. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 87th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Nova Ltd. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Nova Ltd. is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 87th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.