Pyramid Technoplast share price today

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's share price was ₹150.47 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 4 weeks. That is 6.3% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹141 and ₹181, and at that close it sat 24% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Pyramid Technoplast Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 13 weeks running.

Over the last 3.2 years the share price moved −7% while the NIFTY 500 moved +27%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 7 August 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 8 quarters in a row and highest quarterly revenue in 15 quarters.

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 8 quarters in a row

   In the June 2026 quarter revenue was ₹222 crore, +35.4% on a year earlier.

2. Highest quarterly revenue in 15 quarters

   Revenue of ₹222 crore in the June 2026 quarter is the highest of the last 15 quarters.

For April to June 2026 (the quarter ended 30 June 2026), Pyramid Technoplast reported revenue of ₹222 crore, up 35.4% from ₹164 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹10.0 crore, up 25.0% from ₹8.00 crore.

Pyramid Technoplast results: April to June 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for July to September 2026, are due by 14 November 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Pyramid Technoplast's management discussed these results on a call held on 12 August 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 June 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Pyramid Technoplast closed at ₹150.47 on 4 November 2026, down 6.3% from ₹160.53 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and down 33.5% over three years. Its highest weekly close since September 2023 was ₹230.81 on 8 November 2024.

Pyramid Technoplast share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

173 weekly closes from 1 September 2023 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Pyramid Technoplast closed at ₹150.47, up 2.1% on the week and down 2.5% on the month. 11 Sep 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹0.50 a share.

Earlier

• 12 Aug 2026: Pyramid Technoplast held its results call for April to June 2026.
• Results for April to June 2026: Revenue up 35.4% and profit up 25.0% on a year earlier.

Pyramid Technoplast paid ₹0.50 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 6 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.33% at the ₹150.47 close on 4 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹0.50 a share, ex-date 11 September 2026.

Pyramid Technoplast dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd paid out 6% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 2 of its last 7 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 6 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 12 August 2026, Pyramid Technoplast's management spoke about the quarter; the main points are below.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 12 August 2026.

Pyramid Technoplast is not on any of our India lists this week.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd earned ₹10.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +25.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹29.0 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 30.0% a year on average. That is 4.5% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹8.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹29.0 Cr (+7.4% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +35.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved +1.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +9.8% and revenue +18.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd reported ₹222 Cr of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +35.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 8th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 17.5% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹681 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹739 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹681 Cr, +15.2% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +18.9% on average, against 17.5% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +19.0%, against +18.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +10.7%, against +3.4% a year (accelerating).

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's operating margin was 9.0% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 1.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 years it has been between 7.0% and 11.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +1.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −3.2 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −12%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹41.0 Cr of cash, against ₹29.0 Cr of profit. After ₹89.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹130 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why −12% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 81 days longer between FY21 and FY26, so more of each rupee of profit waits in the business before it arrives. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: less of the profit turns into cash than it should, and the cash cycle is 81 days longer. The next section looks at where the cash is stuck.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 124 days in FY26, up from 43 days in FY21. It spent ₹191 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 77 days to pay, and stock sits for 79 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹681 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹1.9 Cr, so roughly ₹231 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 77 days to pay and stock sat for 79 days, about 2.6 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 124 days, longer than FY21's 43.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 79 days. Customers pay about 77 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 31 days. Together that makes the 124-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹191 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹26.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹3.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: cash is getting stuck in the daily cycle, so watch the cycle more than the profit.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's P/E is 17.7×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 21.9×, over 3.2 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +8.0% while the price moved −6.3%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved −12.7% a year; about +0.2% a year came from earnings growth and about −12.9 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's business is getting better. EPS growth hit its low 7 quarters ago at −20.6% and has recovered to +15.9%, with ROCE steady at 15.9%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a lasting rise from a low is what this page is built to show.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd earned a ROCE of 12% in FY26. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 4.0 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 4.3% net margin and 1.29× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 4.3% net margin × 1.29× asset turnover × 1.90× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 10.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 8.0% − 12.0% = −4.0 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has total debt of ₹184 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹277 Cr as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.66× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.52 in FY23 to 0.66 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

No group of Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's owners changed its stake by a full percentage point over the last two years. Promoters moved +0.0 points over the same period, to 75.0%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters, to 2.9%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 75.0%; Foreign institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 0.7%.

For Pyramid Technoplast Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

43.7 out of 100, rank 1 of 3 in Packaging & Containers, with 97% of the evidence available.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd scores 43.7 out of 100 against the 3 companies it is compared with in Packaging & Containers, ranking 1. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 21 + 8.8 + 9.4 + 4.5 = 43.7. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Pyramid Technoplast ranks 1 of 3 Packaging & Containers companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 43.7 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Jun 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Packaging & Containers, all 3 compared on one page.

Pyramid Technoplast is the 2nd largest of 3 Packaging & Containers companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Oricon Enterprises. Just below it: Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC.

Packaging & Containers companies close in size

1. Oricon Enterprises Ltd ₹885 crore
2. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd ₹542 crore
3. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd ₹296 crore

All 3 Packaging & Containers companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1992. Arvaya Healthcare Ltd ₹544 crore
1993. Blue Water Logistics Ltd ₹543 crore · Miscellaneous
1994. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd ₹542 crore
1995. DC Infotech & Communication Ltd ₹541 crore · Trading
1996. Hindustan Media Ventures Ltd ₹541 crore · Entertainment & Media

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.