Packaging & Containers Stocks and Companies in India

The largest Packaging & Containers stocks in India by market value are Oricon Enterprises (₹870 crore), Pyramid Technoplast (₹543 crore) and Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC (₹296 crore), at prices of 6 Nov 2026.

• Oricon Enterprises: ₹55.40 | market value ₹870 crore | P/E 52.5
• Pyramid Technoplast: ₹147.72 | market value ₹543 crore | P/E 17.3
• Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC: ₹292 (price from the week of 27 Sep 2026) | market value ₹296 crore | P/E 104

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices, market values and ratios at the official close of 6 Nov 2026; the score list below uses the weekly figures.

All 3 listed Indian Packaging & Containers companies are named here, largest first. This is the set of companies people mean when they search for a Nifty Packaging & Containers index; NSE publishes its own indices only for the largest sectors, so this equal-weighted set stands in for one. One large company cannot set the reading.

1. Oricon Enterprises Ltd₹885 cr
2. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd₹542 cr
3. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd₹296 cr

3 Packaging & Containers companies in the Packaging & Containers industry group have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 6 November 2026, and all 3 are listed below, largest first. The largest is Oricon Enterprises (₹885 crore) and the smallest with a market value is Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC.

Download all 3 Packaging & Containers companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this sector is 8% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 42% on average over the last four reported quarters.

0 of 3 companies pass the momentum test (5+ points ahead of the Nifty 500 over 3 months, within 20% of the 52-week high).

Not ahead of NIFTY 500 on the three-month view this week; 0 of the 3 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (1 fewer than four weeks earlier); 0 of those 3 pass the momentum test (no change from four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 1 of the 3 that report earnings.

Not ahead of NIFTY 500, not building participation, not giving any back. Earnings not confirming, 1 of 3 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 3 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the sector taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

The 52-week comparison of Packaging & Containers against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. Oricon Enterprises Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +1.7%.

The 52-week comparison for the industry is not available. 0 of 3 companies we track are currently doing better than the NIFTY 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (1 has no relative-strength reading yet).

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 97% evidence confidence.

Oricon Enterprises Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Packaging & Containers at +6.3%. It also leads on relative strength against the NIFTY, at −0.4%. 0 of 3 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure (1 has no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 30 October 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs NIFTY 500: How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Packaging & Containers itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against NIFTY 500

Strongest against the sector itself

1 of 2 Packaging & Containers companies held a results call for April to June 2026.

From the results calls for April to June 2026.

Big funds, foreign and Indian, kept their stake about the same over the last two quarters. Founders and promoters kept theirs about the same.

• Spending on new plants and equipment was ₹99 crore in the last 12 months, 57% less than a year before.
• Projects still being built shrank 68% in a year.

Big funds = foreign and Indian institutions, change in their share of ownership across 3 Packaging & Containers companies, in percentage points.

Ownership and spending as of 10 October 2026.

This is the written read behind the Packaging & Containers figures above: what is actually happening in the industry, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 17 Apr 2026, so the words are older than the numbers. 2 themes are live here, 1 of them rated high severity.

The sector presents a challenging fundamental picture. While asset sales have successfully deleveraged the balance sheet and provided a temporary boost to reported net profit via other income, the core operational engine is misfiring.

The Packaging & Containers sector, represented by ORICONENT in this period, is experiencing a WEAK demand environment. Core operations are under severe pressure, evidenced by ORICONENT reporting a 27.18% year-on-year decline in net sales to ₹17.66 crores for Q3 FY26.

How old this read is: OLD: this read comes from our Packaging & Containers sector brief dated 17 Apr 2026, about 7 months ago. The page says so rather than dressing it up, and a fresh sector dive replaces it the day it runs.

What is live in this sector right now

Sources: our Packaging & Containers sector brief, 17 Apr 2026 · company earnings-call transcripts.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 3 Packaging & Containers companies compared here, at ₹739 crore. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd is next at ₹409 crore. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 21.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 17 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd is the largest at ₹739 crore, 80.7% ahead of Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd's growth is 21.4% from a ₹409 crore base, with 10 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd is the size to compare against; Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd's growth falls below Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the highest OPM among the 3 Packaging & Containers companies compared here, at 9%. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd is next at 6%. The same company also has the highest Margin change, at +1 percentage points. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd leads both opm at 9% and margin change at +1 percentage points.

What this means: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 3 Packaging & Containers companies compared here, at ₹31 crore. Oricon Enterprises Ltd is next at ₹29 crore. The same company also has the highest Profit growth, at 10.7%. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd earns the most, ₹31 crore of profit over the last 12 months, 6.9% above Oricon Enterprises Ltd. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 3 Packaging & Containers companies compared here, at 12.3%. Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd is next at 6.8%. Oricon Enterprises Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd leads ROCE at 12.3%, 5.5 percentage points above Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Pyramid Technoplast Ltd sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

Withheld from this chart: Oricon Enterprises Ltd (ORICONENT): its two data sources disagree by up to 1,775% on reported income across 16 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn, the gap is a decision, not missing data.

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 3 Packaging & Containers companies compared here, at 0.95×. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd is next at 2.73×. Pyramid Technoplast Ltd has the lowest P/E at 17.3×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Shree Tirupati Balajee FIBC Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.95×, 65.2% below Pyramid Technoplast Ltd. That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Packaging & Containers companies show up on one of our India lists. The most are on the penny stocks list (1 company).

This Packaging & Containers comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 3 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 has second-source figures left out because the two sources disagree. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
• 1 company is missing from the second-source figures on purpose: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Those rows have less evidence; that does not make the business weaker.
• Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 3 Packaging & Containers companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 6 November 2026.

1 of 3 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Oricon Enterprises Ltd (ORICONENT): its two data sources disagree by up to 1,775% on reported income across 16 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.

These 22 answers restate the Packaging & Containers comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 3 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 6 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.