Woodside Energy Group Ltd
WDSWoodside Energy Group Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +33.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −24.0% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −15.6% year on year, and 236% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at $22.4, between stages. That is +13.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 78% of a 52-week range of $14 to $25. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (11 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is between stages. At $22.4 it trades +13.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 78% of its 52-week range ($14–$25).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +41% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (11 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-22) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at 16.2× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 16.2× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −24.0% against a +33.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Woodside Energy Group Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −15.1% latest against +229.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 15.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −1.5% | −8.3% | — | — |
| Profit | −24.9% | −25.3% | — | — |
| EPS | −24.0% | −30.7% | — | — |
| Stock price | +33.1% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
53.4/100 — rank 30 of 30 in Oil & Gas Exploration & Production · 32% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Woodside Energy Group Ltd scores 53.4 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, ranking 30. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.6 + 10.8 + 10.5 + 14.5 = 53.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported $6.4 B of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −11.1% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 16.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $13.0 B. The last four reported quarters add to $26.2 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $13.0 B (−1.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 16.9% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed $6.4 B, −11.1% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −2.8% growth against the decade's 16.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −15.1% over the last 4 quarters against +57.4%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's operating margin is 32.4% in the Dec 25 quarter, +2.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +24.5 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.7% to 54.6%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 32.4%, +2.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.7%–54.6%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +24.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −13.7 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd earned $1.4 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −15.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.7 B. The 4-year compound rate is 7.7%. That is 22.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.04 B. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Dec 25 profit was $1.4 B, −15.6% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $2.7 B (−24.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 7.7%.
🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −11.1% and the margin +2.5 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −12.3% vs revenue −2.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 236% of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $7.2 B of operating cash against $2.7 B of profit. After $8.0 B of capital spending, $−0.8 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $7.2 B against reported profit of $2.7 B, leaving free cash of $−0.8 B after $8.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 236% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Woodside Energy Group Ltd does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $18.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 46.2% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $18.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd earns a ROE of 7% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 5% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +1.9 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 21.1% net margin on 0.20× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 7%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 5% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 21.1% net margin × 0.20× asset turns × 1.67× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 7.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 4.0% − 2.1% = a +1.9 pp spread. The 2.1% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.
Dividend
Woodside Energy Group Ltd pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Debt-to-equity is 0.34 at the latest reading — modestly levered; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.
We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 0.34 — a modest level of leverage behind the returns above. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Woodside Energy Group Ltd, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd: the Z-score reads 1.17. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.17 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.17.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1APA CorporationAPA | 65.8/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.0/35 Revenue -17.4% · PAT 37.2% · OPM change 15.2 pp 83% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 42.9% 76% evidence | 14.9/20 P/E 9.9× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence | 12.8/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 78.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23 + 15.1 + 14.9 + 12.8 = 65.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Ovintiv Inc.OVV | 65.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 20.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 45% evidence | 16.7/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 29.2% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.0/20 RS sector 16.6% · RS bench 13.6% · 1Y 52.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.9 + 16.7 + 9.4 + 18 = 65 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Canadian Natural Resources LimitedCNQ | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue 0.7% · PAT 28.1% · OPM change -5.4 pp 83% evidence | 14.0/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 24.7% 76% evidence | 11.6/20 P/E 14.6× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 6.8% · 1Y 52.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 14 + 11.6 + 15.7 = 59.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Black Stone Minerals, L.P.BSM | 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 23.7/35 Revenue 20.9% · PAT 33.2% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 28% 76% evidence | 13.8/20 P/E 11.9× · PEG 0.31 65% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector -3.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 21.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.7 + 11.3 + 13.8 + 10.1 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V.VIST | 56.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.5 pp 45% evidence | 16.0/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 24.9% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.2/20 RS sector 9.9% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 55.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.5 + 16 + 11.1 + 14.2 = 56.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Permian Resources CorporationPR | 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.2/35 Revenue -1.1% · PAT -46.3% · OPM change -2.9 pp 83% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 33.7% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 24.8× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 12.9% · RS bench 9.8% · 1Y 54.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 13.7 + 11.5 + 17 = 56.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7EOG Resources, Inc.EOG | 54.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.7 pp 45% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 6.9% · RS bench 4.8% · 1Y 23.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.9 + 10.8 + 9.7 + 17 = 54.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Texas Pacific Land CorporationTPL | 54.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.6/35 Revenue 15.4% · PAT 9.1% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence | 18.7/25 ROCE 12.5% · OPM 77% 76% evidence | 3.9/20 P/E 65× · PEG 6.88 65% evidence | 9.9/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench -4.4% · 1Y 37.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 18.7 + 3.9 + 9.9 = 54.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 9Gulfport Energy CorporationGPOR | 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BASING | 25.5/35 Revenue 90.8% · PAT — · OPM change 45.9 pp 62% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 52% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.0/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -25.4% · 1Y -6.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 25.5 + 14.1 + 11.4 + 2 = 53 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -24.3% and the one-year return is -6.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10Antero Resources CorporationAR | 52.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.4 pp 45% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 10.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -9% · 1Y 8.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 12.3 + 10.8 + 8.3 = 52.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Baytex Energy Corp.BTE | 52.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.5 pp 32% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 11.2% · RS bench 7.9% · 1Y 106.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 11.4 + 10.4 + 12.7 = 52.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Range Resources CorporationRRC | 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.9 pp 45% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 46.7% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 10.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 14.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 12.6 + 10.7 + 7.8 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Crescent Energy CompanyCRGY | 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT — · OPM change 9.6 pp 62% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 27.7% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector 0.9% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y 22.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.4 + 9.5 + 7.7 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14SM Energy CompanySM | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 11.7/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT -84% · OPM change -52.8 pp 83% evidence | 6.3/25 ROCE -2.6% · OPM -20.1% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG 0.35 65% evidence | 19.2/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y 18.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.7 + 6.3 + 13 + 19.2 = 50.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 10.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15BKV CorporationBKV | 48.4/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 76.8 pp 62% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 8.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.8/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -20.6% · 1Y 16.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26 + 10.6 + 11 + 0.8 = 48.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is 16.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 16CNX Resources CorporationCNX | 48.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 347.8 pp 45% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 60.4% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 5.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench -10.4% · 1Y 22.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 13.1 + 11.5 + 7 = 48 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Chord Energy CorporationCHRD | 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.3/35 Revenue -1% · PAT -89.1% · OPM change -7.8 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 20% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 125.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.0/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y 35.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.3 + 11.8 + 8.6 + 16 = 47.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 18ConocoPhillipsCOP | 47.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.2 pp 45% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 20.7% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 23.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench 0.3% · 1Y 25.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.8 + 9.1 + 13.2 = 47.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19Magnolia Oil & Gas CorporationMGY | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BASING | 14.8/35 Revenue -1.9% · PAT -18.7% · OPM change -3.2 pp 83% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 35.6% 76% evidence | 14.0/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -14.1% · 1Y 4.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 15.7 + 14 + 2.3 = 46.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 20Occidental Petroleum CorporationOXY | 45.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.5 pp 45% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.0/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 24.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.7 + 10.1 + 13 = 45.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Murphy Oil CorporationMUR | 45.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.9/35 Revenue -5.1% · PAT -74.8% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 18.9% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 69.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 6.2% · RS bench 3.8% · 1Y 64.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.9 + 10.3 + 8.7 + 13.2 = 45.1 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 22Expand Energy CorporationEXE | 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 47 pp 45% evidence | 10.7/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 34.8% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.2/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -18.3% · 1Y -6.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 10.7 + 11.3 + 6.2 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Diamondback Energy, Inc.FANG | 44.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 10.8/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT -95.4% · OPM change -38.6 pp 83% evidence | 7.7/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence | 13.3/20 P/E 230× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 12.8/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 35.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.8 + 7.7 + 13.3 + 12.8 = 44.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 24EQT CorporationEQT | 43.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 31.8 pp 45% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 60.3% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.8/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y 2.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 10.6 + 10.2 + 4.8 = 43 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Comstock Resources, Inc.CRK | 42.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.2 pp 45% evidence | 8.0/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 29.8% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -35.4% · RS bench -36.1% · 1Y -16.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 8 + 11.2 + 5.6 = 42.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Devon Energy CorporationDVN | 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.3/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT -19.4% · OPM change -9.8 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 7.7% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 32.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.3 + 9.8 + 9.8 + 7.3 = 39.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Talos Energy Inc.TALO | 35.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -33.8 pp 39% evidence | 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -25.3% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 69.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.5/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 3.1% · 1Y 82.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.1 + 3.6 + 8.8 + 10.5 = 35 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 28Matador Resources CompanyMTDR | 31.2/100Adverse evidence81% evidence | BASING | 9.4/35 Revenue -2.9% · PAT -42.9% · OPM change -33.7 pp 83% evidence | 8.3/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 5% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG 0.9 65% evidence | 3.2/20 RS sector -9.3% · RS bench -11.4% · 1Y 4.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.4 + 8.3 + 10.3 + 3.2 = 31.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 29California Resources CorporationCRC | 21.8/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | BASING | 4.1/35 Revenue -21.3% · PAT -192.4% · OPM change -617.9 pp 83% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE -12.3% · OPM -597.5% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.4/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.1 + 4.7 + 10.6 + 2.4 = 21.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 30Woodside Energy Group Ltdthis pageWDS | 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 10.8/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.5/20 RS sector 8.5% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 28.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 10.8 + 10.5 + 14.5 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's stock price today?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at $22.4, +33.1% over the past year. The company is valued at $44.0 B. The stock sits at 78% of its 52-week range of $14–$25, +13.9% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 11 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported revenue of $6.4 B and net profit of $1.4 B for the Dec 25 quarter. Revenue fell 11.1% and profit fell 15.6% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.73. The operating margin was 32.4%, 2.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported revenue of $6.4 B in the Dec 25 quarter, −11.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $13.0 B (−1.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 16.9% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's profit?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd earned $1.4 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −15.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.7 B. The operating margin ran 32.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's market cap?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's market capitalisation is $44.0 B at a stock price of $22.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Woodside Energy Group Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Woodside Energy Group Ltd has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd growing?
Not right now — Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −11.1% year on year, profit −15.6%, and the margin +2.5 pp at 32.4%. The 4-year compound rates are 16.9% (revenue) and 7.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Woodside Energy Group Ltd performing?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest readings are below. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 11.1% and profit fell 15.6% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 11 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Woodside Energy Group Ltd in?
Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −15.1% latest against +229.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 15.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −15.1% latest, profit growth −23.2% latest, eps growth −35.9% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Woodside Energy Group Ltd is currently behind the S&P 500 (11 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-22), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +41% against the S&P 500's +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Woodside Energy Group Ltd's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Woodside Energy Group Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $22.4. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Woodside Energy Group Ltd have too much debt?
It is moderate — Woodside Energy Group Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.34. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's capex?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd spent $18.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $8.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's cash flow?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $7.2 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.8 B of free cash flow after $8.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $2.7 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 236% of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $7.2 B against reported profit of $2.7 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Woodside Energy Group Ltd?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.17 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Woodside Energy Group Ltd in its business cycle?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's FY25 operating margin was 30.0%, against a 5-year band of 23.7%–54.6%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 32.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Woodside Energy Group Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +33.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −24.0% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Woodside Energy Group Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.