Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-05
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-08-05

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

WDS
Energy · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +33.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −24.0% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.

The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read deteriorating — profit −15.6% year on year, and 236% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.

Stage
Deteriorating
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
$22.4
+33.1% 1Y
P/E
16.2×
of its own 1-year range
Revenue (Dec 25)
$6.4 B
−11.1% YoY
Profit (Dec 25)
$1.4 B
−15.6% YoY
Operating margin
32.4%
+2.5 pp YoY
ROE
7%
FY25
ROIC
4.0%
vs WACC 2.1% → +1.9 pp
Cash conversion
236%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at $22.4, between stages. That is +13.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 78% of a 52-week range of $14 to $25. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (11 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $22.4 it trades +13.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 78% of its 52-week range ($14–$25).

Aug 26: $22.4 Weekly closing price ($) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+13.9% versus the 200-day line, week — of stage —
Price50-day avg200-day avg
$25.6$22.6$19.5$16.5$13.4$$22$20Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26Aug 26
$25.6$22.6$19.5$16.5$13.4$$22$20Jul 25Jan 26Aug 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2025 Each cell is one week from 2025 to now (57 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the S&P 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the S&P 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the S&P 500
Jul 25Aug 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +41% while the S&P 500 moved +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (11 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-22) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at 16.2× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 16.2× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 16.2× vs a null× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly step line (right axis). 1.1-year window; loss-period spikes above 7.4× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
against too little history to rank
P/EEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
7.6×$3.66.8×$2.76.1×$1.85.4×$0.94.6×$0.0×$6.82×$3Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26Aug 26
7.6×$3.66.8×$2.76.1×$1.85.4×$0.94.6×$0.0×$6.82×$3Jul 25Jan 26Aug 26
P/E
16.2×
too little history to rank
PEG
4.32
derived from 3-year earnings growth

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −24.0% against a +33.1% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Deteriorating

Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Woodside Energy Group Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −15.1% latest against +229.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 15.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −1.5% in FY25, profit −24.9% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
154%247%108%159%62%71%16%−16%−29%−104%%%−1.5%−24.9%FY21FY23FY25
154%247%108%159%62%71%16%−16%−29%−104%%%−1.5%−24.9%FY21FY23FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over
RevenueProfitEPS
249%159%178%48%107%−64%36%−175%−35%−286%%%−15.1%−23.2%−35.9%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
249%159%178%48%107%−64%36%−175%−35%−286%%%−15.1%−23.2%−35.9%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
42%34%26%18%10.0%%15.1%Jun 20Jun 21Dec 22Jun 24Dec 25
42%34%26%18%10.0%%15.1%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
Revenue growth
Falling
latest −15.1% · span −15.1% to +229.3%
Profit growth
Falling
latest −23.2% · span −249.6% to +128.1%
EPS growth
Falling
latest −35.9% · span −255.2% to +32.8%
ROCE
Rolling over
latest 15.1% · span 12.2%–39.9%

🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; stock price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−1.5%−8.3%
Profit−24.9%−25.3%
EPS−24.0%−30.7%
Stock price+33.1%
Revenue YoY (Dec 25)
−11.1%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Dec 25)
−15.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
16.9%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

53.4/100 — rank 30 of 30 in Oil & Gas Exploration & Production · 32% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Woodside Energy Group Ltd scores 53.4 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, ranking 30. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.6 + 10.8 + 10.5 + 14.5 = 53.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported $6.4 B of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −11.1% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 16.9% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $13.0 B. The last four reported quarters add to $26.2 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $13.0 B (−1.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 16.9% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed $6.4 B, −11.1% year on year.

FY25 revenue $13.0 B (−1.5% YoY) Revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
16.9% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
18154%14108%9.162%4.516%0.0−29%$ B%$13B−1.5%FY21FY23FY25
18154%14108%9.162%4.516%0.0−29%$ B%$13B−1.5%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $6.4 B (−11.1% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
12180%8.9121%5.962%3.02.7%0.0−56%$ B%$6B−11.1%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
12180%8.9121%5.962%3.02.7%0.0−56%$ B%$6B−11.1%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −2.8% growth against the decade's 16.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −15.1% over the last 4 quarters against +57.4%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's operating margin is 32.4% in the Dec 25 quarter, +2.5 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +24.5 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.7% to 54.6%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 32.4%, +2.5 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.7%–54.6%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +24.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −13.7 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

FY25: 30.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 23.7–54.6% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
57%14%48%1.8%39%−10%30%−22%21%−34%%%30%−4.2%FY21FY23FY25
57%14%48%1.8%39%−10%30%−22%21%−34%%%30%−4.2%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: 32.4% operating margin (+2.5 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
91%347%−6.8%172%−105%0.0%−203%−178%−301%−354%%%32.4%2.5%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
91%347%−6.8%172%−105%0.0%−203%−178%−301%−354%%%32.4%2.5%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd earned $1.4 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −15.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.7 B. The 4-year compound rate is 7.7%. That is 22.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost $0.04 B. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was $1.4 B, −15.6% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $2.7 B (−24.9%), and the 4-year compound rate is 7.7%.

FY25 profit $2.7 B (−24.9% YoY) Net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
7.7% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
7.1246%5.3160%3.674%1.8−12%0.0−98%$ B%$3B−24.9%FY21FY23FY25
7.1246%5.3160%3.674%1.8−12%0.0−98%$ B%$3B−24.9%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: $1.4 B (−15.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, $ B (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
5.63,017%3.01,928%0.4839%−2.2−251%−4.8−1,340%$ B%$1B−15.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
5.63,017%3.01,928%0.4839%−2.2−251%−4.8−1,340%$ B%$1B−15.6%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −11.1% and the margin +2.5 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −12.3% vs revenue −2.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 236% of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $7.2 B of operating cash against $2.7 B of profit. After $8.0 B of capital spending, $−0.8 B was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of $7.2 B against reported profit of $2.7 B, leaving free cash of $−0.8 B after $8.0 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 236% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY25: CFO $7.2 B vs profit $2.7 B Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, $ B; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
236% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
9.66.84.01.2−1.5$ B$7B$3B$−1BFY21FY23FY25
9.66.84.01.2−1.5$ B$7B$3B$−1BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: operating cash $3.9 B = 273% of the quarter's profit Operating cash per quarter, $ B (bars); conversion = operating cash as % of net profit (line, right). Last 12 quarters. Dashed line = 100%.
Operating cash (quarterly)Conversion100%
6.81,324%5.1995%3.4667%1.7338%0.00.0%$ B%$4B273%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25
6.81,324%5.1995%3.4667%1.7338%0.00.0%$ B%$4B273%Jun 20Dec 22Dec 25

Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Woodside Energy Group Ltd does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $18.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 46.2% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of $18.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.

FY25: capex $8.0 B Capital spending per fiscal year, $ B (bars).
steady investment
Capex
8.66.54.32.20.0$ B$8BFY21FY23FY25
8.66.54.32.20.0$ B$8BFY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: capex $3.1 B in the quarter Capital spending per quarter, $ B (bars, left); free cash flow, $ B (line, right). Last 12 quarters.
Capex (quarterly)
5.34.02.61.30.0$ B$3BJun 20Dec 22Dec 25
5.34.02.61.30.0$ B$3BJun 20Dec 22Dec 25

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

10 · Return on equity

Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd earns a ROE of 7% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 5% in FY23. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +1.9 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 21.1% net margin on 0.20× asset turns.

FY25 ROE is 7%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 5% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 21.1% net margin × 0.20× asset turns × 1.67× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 7.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 4.0% − 2.1% = a +1.9 pp spread. The 2.1% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Positive but thin — value creation with little room for error.

FY25: ROE 7% Return on equity by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 5-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 2.1% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY23's 5%
ROEROIC (annual)WACC
25%19%13%6.6%0.4%%6.9%6%FY21FY23FY25
25%19%13%6.6%0.4%%6.9%6%FY21FY23FY25
Dec 25: ROIC 5.0% (TTM) vs WACC 2.1% Trailing-twelve-month ROIC and ROE, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROIC (TTM)ROE (TTM)WACC
27%20%14%6.9%0.0%%5%7.4%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
27%20%14%6.9%0.0%%5%7.4%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
11 · Dividend

Dividend

Woodside Energy Group Ltd pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

12 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Debt-to-equity is 0.34 at the latest reading — modestly levered; a full borrowings history is not in our numbers.

We hold only the latest reading here: a debt-to-equity of 0.34 — a modest level of leverage behind the returns above. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so we say that rather than draw a chart we cannot support.

13 · Ownership

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for Woodside Energy Group Ltd, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.0 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

14 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd: the Z-score reads 1.17. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 1.17 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 1.17.

15 · Related companies · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1APA CorporationAPA 65.8/100Favorable setup81% evidence ASLEEP 23.0/35 Revenue -17.4% · PAT 37.2% · OPM change 15.2 pp 83% evidence 15.1/25 ROCE 6.4% · OPM 42.9% 76% evidence 14.9/20 P/E 9.9× · PEG 0.18 65% evidence 12.8/20 RS sector 10.9% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 78.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 15.1 + 14.9 + 12.8 = 65.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Ovintiv Inc.OVV 65.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 20.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.8 pp 45% evidence 16.7/25 ROCE 15.8% · OPM 29.2% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.0/20 RS sector 16.6% · RS bench 13.6% · 1Y 52.3%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.9 + 16.7 + 9.4 + 18 = 65 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Canadian Natural Resources LimitedCNQ 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue 0.7% · PAT 28.1% · OPM change -5.4 pp 83% evidence 14.0/25 ROCE 3.3% · OPM 24.7% 76% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 14.6× · PEG 0.49 65% evidence 15.7/20 RS sector 9.7% · RS bench 6.8% · 1Y 52.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 14 + 11.6 + 15.7 = 59.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Black Stone Minerals, L.P.BSM 58.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 23.7/35 Revenue 20.9% · PAT 33.2% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 28% 76% evidence 13.8/20 P/E 11.9× · PEG 0.31 65% evidence 10.1/20 RS sector -3.1% · RS bench -4.6% · 1Y 21.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23.7 + 11.3 + 13.8 + 10.1 = 58.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Vista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V.VIST 56.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 15.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7.5 pp 45% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 24.9% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.2/20 RS sector 9.9% · RS bench 6.6% · 1Y 55.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.5 + 16 + 11.1 + 14.2 = 56.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Permian Resources CorporationPR 56.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 14.2/35 Revenue -1.1% · PAT -46.3% · OPM change -2.9 pp 83% evidence 13.7/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 33.7% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 24.8× · PEG 0.38 65% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 12.9% · RS bench 9.8% · 1Y 54.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.2 + 13.7 + 11.5 + 17 = 56.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
7EOG Resources, Inc.EOG 54.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 16.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.7 pp 45% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence 9.7/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 6.9% · RS bench 4.8% · 1Y 23.4%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.9 + 10.8 + 9.7 + 17 = 54.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Texas Pacific Land CorporationTPL 54.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 21.6/35 Revenue 15.4% · PAT 9.1% · OPM change 0.4 pp 83% evidence 18.7/25 ROCE 12.5% · OPM 77% 76% evidence 3.9/20 P/E 65× · PEG 6.88 65% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench -4.4% · 1Y 37.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.6 + 18.7 + 3.9 + 9.9 = 54.1 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.
9Gulfport Energy CorporationGPOR 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence BASING 25.5/35 Revenue 90.8% · PAT — · OPM change 45.9 pp 62% evidence 14.1/25 ROCE 8.9% · OPM 52% 76% evidence 11.4/20 P/E 7.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.0/20 RS sector -24.3% · RS bench -25.4% · 1Y -6.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 25.5 + 14.1 + 11.4 + 2 = 53 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -24.3% and the one-year return is -6.5%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
10Antero Resources CorporationAR 52.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 21.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 17.4 pp 45% evidence 12.3/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 10.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.3/20 RS sector -7.2% · RS bench -9% · 1Y 8.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.2 + 12.3 + 10.8 + 8.3 = 52.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Baytex Energy Corp.BTE 52.5/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.5 pp 32% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.7/20 RS sector 11.2% · RS bench 7.9% · 1Y 106.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 11.4 + 10.4 + 12.7 = 52.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Range Resources CorporationRRC 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 20.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.9 pp 45% evidence 12.6/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 46.7% 76% evidence 10.7/20 P/E 10.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.8/20 RS sector -5.3% · RS bench -7.1% · 1Y 14.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 20.7 + 12.6 + 10.7 + 7.8 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Crescent Energy CompanyCRGY 50.3/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 21.7/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT — · OPM change 9.6 pp 62% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 27.7% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 15.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.7/20 RS sector 0.9% · RS bench -1.8% · 1Y 22.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.7 + 11.4 + 9.5 + 7.7 = 50.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
14SM Energy CompanySM 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence TURNING 11.7/35 Revenue 27.3% · PAT -84% · OPM change -52.8 pp 83% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE -2.6% · OPM -20.1% 76% evidence 13.0/20 P/E 13.1× · PEG 0.35 65% evidence 19.2/20 RS sector 12.5% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y 18.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.7 + 6.3 + 13 + 19.2 = 50.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 10.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
15BKV CorporationBKV 48.4/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 26.0/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 76.8 pp 62% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 19.9% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 8.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 0.8/20 RS sector -19% · RS bench -20.6% · 1Y 16.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 26 + 10.6 + 11 + 0.8 = 48.4 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -19% and the one-year return is 16.8%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
16CNX Resources CorporationCNX 48.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 347.8 pp 45% evidence 13.1/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 60.4% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 5.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -8.8% · RS bench -10.4% · 1Y 22.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 13.1 + 11.5 + 7 = 48 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
17Chord Energy CorporationCHRD 47.7/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 11.3/35 Revenue -1% · PAT -89.1% · OPM change -7.8 pp 83% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 20% 76% evidence 8.6/20 P/E 125.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.0/20 RS sector 11.8% · RS bench 9.1% · 1Y 35.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.3 + 11.8 + 8.6 + 16 = 47.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 9.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
18ConocoPhillipsCOP 47.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.2 pp 45% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 20.7% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 23.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 2.6% · RS bench 0.3% · 1Y 25.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.8 + 9.1 + 13.2 = 47.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19Magnolia Oil & Gas CorporationMGY 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BASING 14.8/35 Revenue -1.9% · PAT -18.7% · OPM change -3.2 pp 83% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 35.6% 76% evidence 14.0/20 P/E 18.4× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence 2.3/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -14.1% · 1Y 4.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.8 + 15.7 + 14 + 2.3 = 46.8 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
20Occidental Petroleum CorporationOXY 45.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -10.5 pp 45% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 13.4% 76% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 13× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.0/20 RS sector 2.3% · RS bench -0.1% · 1Y 24.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.7 + 10.1 + 13 = 45.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
21Murphy Oil CorporationMUR 45.1/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 12.9/35 Revenue -5.1% · PAT -74.8% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence 10.3/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 18.9% 76% evidence 8.7/20 P/E 69.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.2/20 RS sector 6.2% · RS bench 3.8% · 1Y 64.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.9 + 10.3 + 8.7 + 13.2 = 45.1 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 3.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
22Expand Energy CorporationEXE 44.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 16.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 47 pp 45% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 34.8% 76% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.2/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -18.3% · 1Y -6.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.5 + 10.7 + 11.3 + 6.2 = 44.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
23Diamondback Energy, Inc.FANG 44.6/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 10.8/35 Revenue 18.1% · PAT -95.4% · OPM change -38.6 pp 83% evidence 7.7/25 ROCE 0.2% · OPM 2.7% 76% evidence 13.3/20 P/E 230× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence 12.8/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 35.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10.8 + 7.7 + 13.3 + 12.8 = 44.6 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
24EQT CorporationEQT 43.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 31.8 pp 45% evidence 10.6/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 60.3% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 12.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.8/20 RS sector -13.7% · RS bench -15.1% · 1Y 2.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.4 + 10.6 + 10.2 + 4.8 = 43 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
25Comstock Resources, Inc.CRK 42.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BASING 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.2 pp 45% evidence 8.0/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 29.8% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 8.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 5.6/20 RS sector -35.4% · RS bench -36.1% · 1Y -16.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 8 + 11.2 + 5.6 = 42.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
26Devon Energy CorporationDVN 39.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 12.3/35 Revenue -1.5% · PAT -19.4% · OPM change -9.8 pp 83% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 7.7% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 14× · PEG — 15% evidence 7.3/20 RS sector -0.3% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 32.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.3 + 9.8 + 9.8 + 7.3 = 39.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
27Talos Energy Inc.TALO 35.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence ASLEEP 12.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -33.8 pp 39% evidence 3.6/25 ROCE -2.4% · OPM -25.3% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 69.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.5/20 RS sector 6% · RS bench 3.1% · 1Y 82.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 12.1 + 3.6 + 8.8 + 10.5 = 35 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
28Matador Resources CompanyMTDR 31.2/100Adverse evidence81% evidence BASING 9.4/35 Revenue -2.9% · PAT -42.9% · OPM change -33.7 pp 83% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 5% 76% evidence 10.3/20 P/E 16.2× · PEG 0.9 65% evidence 3.2/20 RS sector -9.3% · RS bench -11.4% · 1Y 4.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9.4 + 8.3 + 10.3 + 3.2 = 31.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
29California Resources CorporationCRC 21.8/100Adverse evidence71% evidence BASING 4.1/35 Revenue -21.3% · PAT -192.4% · OPM change -617.9 pp 83% evidence 4.7/25 ROCE -12.3% · OPM -597.5% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.4/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -13.2% · 1Y 10.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 4.1 + 4.7 + 10.6 + 2.4 = 21.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
30Woodside Energy Group Ltdthis pageWDS 53.4/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence ASLEEP 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 10.8/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.5/20 RS sector 8.5% · RS bench 5.7% · 1Y 28.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.6 + 10.8 + 10.5 + 14.5 = 53.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

16 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's stock price today?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd trades at $22.4, +33.1% over the past year. The company is valued at $44.0 B. The stock sits at 78% of its 52-week range of $14–$25, +13.9% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 11 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.

What were Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported revenue of $6.4 B and net profit of $1.4 B for the Dec 25 quarter. Revenue fell 11.1% and profit fell 15.6% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.73. The operating margin was 32.4%, 2.5 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported revenue of $6.4 B in the Dec 25 quarter, −11.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $13.0 B (−1.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 16.9% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's profit?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd earned $1.4 B of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −15.6% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $2.7 B. The operating margin ran 32.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's market cap?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's market capitalisation is $44.0 B at a stock price of $22.4. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Woodside Energy Group Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Woodside Energy Group Ltd has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd growing?

Not right now — Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest numbers are shrinking: latest-quarter revenue −11.1% year on year, profit −15.6%, and the margin +2.5 pp at 32.4%. The 4-year compound rates are 16.9% (revenue) and 7.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: deteriorating — as of 5 August 2026.

How is Woodside Energy Group Ltd performing?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's latest readings are below. Its latest quarter's revenue fell 11.1% and profit fell 15.6% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 11 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.

What stage is Woodside Energy Group Ltd in?

Deteriorating — revenue, profit and EPS growth are shrinking (revenue growth −15.1% latest against +229.3% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE slipping at 15.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −15.1% latest, profit growth −23.2% latest, eps growth −35.9% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Woodside Energy Group Ltd is currently behind the S&P 500 (11 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-05-22), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +41% against the S&P 500's +24% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.

Will Woodside Energy Group Ltd's stock price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Woodside Energy Group Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $22.4. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.

Does Woodside Energy Group Ltd have too much debt?

It is moderate — Woodside Energy Group Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.34. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's capex?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd spent $18.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $8.0 B. — as of 5 August 2026.

What is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's cash flow?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $7.2 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.8 B of free cash flow after $8.0 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $2.7 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 236% of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $7.2 B against reported profit of $2.7 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.

How financially safe is Woodside Energy Group Ltd?

On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 1.17 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.

Where is Woodside Energy Group Ltd in its business cycle?

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's FY25 operating margin was 30.0%, against a 5-year band of 23.7%–54.6%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 32.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.

What could break the Woodside Energy Group Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +33.1% in a year while annual EPS moved −24.0% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.

Is Woodside Energy Group Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Woodside Energy Group Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI