WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
WBIWaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk.
The price is between stages. Underneath, the last four quarters read mixed. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC trades at $33.5, between stages. That is +26.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 91% of a 52-week range of $20 to $35. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 6 straight weeks.
Today the stock is between stages. At $33.5 it trades +26.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 91% of its 52-week range ($20–$35).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 11 months the stock moved +45% while the S&P 500 moved +16% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 6 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
P/E does not price WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — earnings are negative, so there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where a turn, when it comes, would show first. On sales the market values WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC at 7.5× its FY25 revenue of $0.5 B.
With earnings negative, P/E does not price — there is no multiple to rank against its own history. The revenue and margin lines below are where the turn, when it comes, will show first.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +65.6% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | +45.0% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
46.2/100 — rank 29 of 30 in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · 36% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC scores 46.2 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, ranking 29. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.9 + 9.8 + 8.5 + 10 = 46.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC reported $0.2 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 2 years it has compounded at 62.8% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.6 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $0.5 B (+65.6% on the year), capping 2 years at 62.8% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.2 B, +100.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +88.9% growth against the decade's 62.8% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's operating margin is 15.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −5.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved −7.2 percentage points. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.1% to 20.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 15.0%, −5.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.1%–20.0%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −7.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +15.6 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. That is 5.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.0 B, null year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.0 B (null).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY25 that was $0.2 B of operating cash against $0.0 B of profit. After $0.3 B of capital spending, $−0.1 B was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.
FY25: operating cash of $0.2 B against reported profit of $0.0 B, leaving free cash of $−0.1 B after $0.3 B of capital spending.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 62.9% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC earns a ROE of 0% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 0% in FY24. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 0.0% net margin on 0.14× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 0%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 0% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 0.0% net margin × 0.14× asset turns × 2.00× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 0.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC has 1 quarter of declared dividends on file — too few for a trailing-twelve-month figure. The most recent declaration was $0.05 for Mar 26.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC has declared a dividend in 1 of the last 6 reported quarters, most recently $0.05 for Mar 26. That is fewer than four quarters, so no trailing-twelve-month total is shown rather than one built from a partial year.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC carries total debt of $1.5 B against shareholder equity of $1.9 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.79. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.52 in FY23 to 0.78 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Mar 26: total debt of $1.5 B against shareholder equity of $1.9 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.79. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.52 (FY23) to 0.78 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
14.8% of WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's tradable float is currently sold short — a large bloc is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.5 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 14.8% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.5 days to buy those positions back. A large bloc is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC: the Z-score reads 0.59. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits inside the distress zone. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
🚨 Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.59 is inside the distress zone — the balance sheet is a real risk, not a detail.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 0.59.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Archrock, Inc.AROC | 63.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 60.1% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 33.8% 76% evidence | 14.7/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG 0.34 65% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -4% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 53.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 15.9 + 14.7 + 11.3 = 63.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2National Energy Services Reunited Corp.NESR | 62.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 19.5/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT -15.6% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence | 13.6/20 P/E 33× · PEG 0.4 65% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 29.9% · RS bench 37.5% · 1Y 332.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 10.9 + 13.6 + 18.4 = 62.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Cactus, Inc.WHD | 61.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -11.8 pp 45% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 12.7% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 43.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.8/20 RS sector 11.6% · RS bench 22.4% · 1Y 74.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 15.3 + 9.7 + 18.8 = 61.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4TechnipFMC plcFTI | 61.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.4 pp 45% evidence | 14.7/25 ROCE 9.8% · OPM 14.1% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 23× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 4.7% · RS bench 12.4% · 1Y 100.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.1 + 14.7 + 10.4 + 14.3 = 61.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Oceaneering International, Inc.OII | 60.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 45% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 8.3% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 32.6% · RS bench 43.3% · 1Y 136.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.8 + 13.3 + 11.5 + 20 = 60.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Tidewater Inc.TDW | 58.7/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.2/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT 69.7% · OPM change -4.4 pp 83% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 18.1% 76% evidence | 14.5/20 P/E 14× · PEG 0.43 65% evidence | 17.2/20 RS sector 4.6% · RS bench 13.9% · 1Y 46.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.2 + 12.8 + 14.5 + 17.2 = 58.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 13.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Tenaris S.A.TS | 58.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.5/35 Revenue 1.3% · PAT 9.5% · OPM change 0 pp 83% evidence | 15.4/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 18.8% 76% evidence | 12.5/20 P/E 15.2× · PEG 0.89 65% evidence | 12.7/20 RS sector 0.6% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 62.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.4 + 12.5 + 12.7 = 58.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8USA Compression Partners, LPUSAC | 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 22.8/35 Revenue 12.1% · PAT 34.4% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 27.6% 76% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 28× · PEG 0.66 65% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench -7.7% · 1Y 8.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 15 + 12.6 + 6.1 = 56.5 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -16.7% and the one-year return is 8.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 9Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.SEI | 56.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.8/35 Revenue 86.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.3 pp 83% evidence | 13.3/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 25.8% 76% evidence | 12.4/20 P/E 63.5× · PEG 0.5 65% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -3.7% · 1Y 93.1%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.8 + 13.3 + 12.4 + 3.8 = 56.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -11% and the one-year return is 93.1%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 10Baker Hughes CompanyBKR | 52.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.1 pp 45% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 17.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -7.4% · RS bench 1.5% · 1Y 42.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19 + 14.1 + 10.7 + 8.5 = 52.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11LandBridge Company LLCLB | 51.0/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.5/35 Revenue 54.5% · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 62% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 57.2% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.1/20 RS sector -5% · RS bench 4.4% · 1Y 42.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.5 + 12 + 9.4 + 12.1 = 51 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Halliburton CompanyHAL | 50.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.6 pp 45% evidence | 14.9/25 ROCE 3.9% · OPM 12.6% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 17.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -8.1% · 1Y 54.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 14.9 + 10.8 + 2.8 = 50.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.KGS | 50.2/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.0/35 Revenue 3.9% · PAT 32.7% · OPM change 3.8 pp 83% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 30.9% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG 1.99 65% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector 1.4% · RS bench 8.6% · 1Y 83.4%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 11.8 + 6.6 + 10.8 = 50.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Select Water Solutions, Inc.WTTR | 48.4/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 14.9/35 Revenue -4.1% · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 62% evidence | 5.9/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 72.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 14.1% · RS bench 22.8% · 1Y 121%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 5.9 + 9.2 + 18.4 = 48.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 22.8%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 15SLB N.V.SLB | 48.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.5 pp 45% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 11.8% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.9/20 RS sector -6% · RS bench 2.4% · 1Y 54.6%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 12.4 + 10.5 + 8.9 = 48.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 16NOV Inc.NOV | 47.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 45% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 71.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector -4.5% · RS bench 4.2% · 1Y 68%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 8.5 + 9.3 + 12.2 = 47.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 17Bristow Group Inc.VTOL | 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 14.0/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT 0.9% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 7.9/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence | 15.9/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 8.5/20 RS sector -7% · RS bench 2.8% · 1Y 25.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14 + 7.9 + 15.9 + 8.5 = 46.3 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 18Enerflex Ltd.EFXT | 45.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.1/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 12.2% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 31.3× · PEG 2.31 65% evidence | 11.5/20 RS sector 3.9% · RS bench 10.5% · 1Y 144.2%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 11.6 + 6.6 + 11.5 = 45.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Innovex International, Inc.INVX | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 10.0/35 Revenue 26.4% · PAT -63.6% · OPM change -18.2 pp 83% evidence | 4.6/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -9.1% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 32.5× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 15.7/20 RS sector 10.8% · RS bench 20.9% · 1Y 95.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10 + 4.6 + 15.1 + 15.7 = 45.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 20.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 20Flowco Holdings Inc.FLOC | 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.1/35 Revenue 17.7% · PAT 45.6% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 17.3% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.9/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -8.2% · 1Y 26.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 12.3 + 10.9 + 2.9 = 45.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 21Weatherford International plcWFRD | 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -12.9% · RS bench -5.2% · 1Y 61.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 11.5 + 11.1 + 3.6 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22RPC, Inc.RES | 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.1 pp 45% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 0.6% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 64.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -16.7% · RS bench -8.9% · 1Y 29.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 8.2 + 9.5 + 4 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Liberty Energy Inc.LBRT | 34.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 45% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 35.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.6/20 RS sector -22.9% · RS bench -18.1% · 1Y 79.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17 + 7.2 + 9.8 + 0.6 = 34.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 24Expro Group Holdings N.V.XPRO | 34.3/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | TURNING | 12.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.7 pp 45% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 0.9% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 82.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -7.7% · RS bench 1.4% · 1Y 63.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.7 + 5.2 + 8.9 + 7.5 = 34.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25ProPetro Holding Corp.PUMP | 33.5/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.6 pp 45% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -3% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 951× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.6/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -6.4% · 1Y 136.3%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 4.5 + 8.6 + 5.6 = 33.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.HLX | 31.0/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | ASLEEP | 6.7/35 Revenue -2.9% · PAT -83.5% · OPM change -7.5 pp 83% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM -4.6% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 98.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.6/20 RS sector -1.3% · RS bench 7.3% · 1Y 64.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.7 + 4 + 8.7 + 11.6 = 31 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.AESI | 18.5/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.8/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -391.2% · OPM change -17.4 pp 83% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM -12.2% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 95.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.4/20 RS sector -27.6% · RS bench -20.9% · 1Y -6.6%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.8 + 4.5 + 8.8 + 0.4 = 18.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28EagleRock Land, LLCEROK | 52.4/100Thin evidence · provisional21% evidence | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.2 pp 7% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 40.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 14.3 + 10 + 10 = 52.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29WaterBridge Infrastructure LLCthis pageWBI | 46.2/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 39% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1040.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —10 of 12 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 9.8 + 8.5 + 10 = 46.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30NextDecade CorporationNEXT | 39.2/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.8/25 ROCE -0.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -24.4% · RS bench -15.3% · 1Y -36.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 5.8 + 10 + 5.3 = 39.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's stock price today?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC trades at $33.5, +45.0% over the past year. The company is valued at $4.0 B. The stock sits at 91% of its 52-week range of $20–$35, +26.8% versus its 200-day average. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's latest quarterly results?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC reported revenue of $0.2 B and net profit of $0.0 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were $0.08. The operating margin was 15.0%, 5.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's revenue?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC reported revenue of $0.2 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +100.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $0.5 B (+65.6%). Over the last 2 years revenue compounded at 62.8% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's profit?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC earned $0.0 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.0 B. The operating margin ran 15.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's market cap?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's market capitalisation is $4.0 B at a stock price of $33.5. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC pay a dividend?
Yes — WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC declared $0.05 per share for Mar 26 (1 quarter on file, too few for a trailing-twelve-month total). — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's dividend per share?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's most recently declared dividend is $0.05 per share for Mar 26. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
How is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC performing?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's latest readings are below. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC beating the market?
On recent form, yes — WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 6 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 11 months the stock moved +45% against the S&P 500's +16% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC. What it measures instead: the stock price is $33.5. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC?
Yes — short interest is 14.8% of WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's tradable float, about 2.5 days to cover at typical volumes. A crowded short: a large bloc is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC have too much debt?
It is moderate — WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's debt-to-equity is 0.80. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's capex?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's cash flow?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC generated $0.2 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.0 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 0.59 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is inside the danger band — a real balance-sheet risk. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC in its business cycle?
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's FY25 operating margin was 15.1%, against a 3-year band of 15.1%–20.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 15.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC story?
Biggest watch item: the price is not yet in a confirmed uptrend — timing risk, not thesis risk. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.