Archrock, Inc. · AROC
$195M
$195M
$197M
$216M
$214M
$219M
$230M
$248M
$253M
$260M
$268M
$271M
$292M
$326M
$347M
$383M
$382M
$377M
$374M
—
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Stocks
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services: SLB N.V. owns the largest revenue base; Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Oil & Gas Equipment & Services moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 51% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 3% on average over the last four reported quarters.
TURNING · ahead 1w~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming16 of 37 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
RS ↑1w · 22/37 >200d (−3) · 16/37 lead (+7) · EPS 15/34↑
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, equal-weighted, based at 200
S&P 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 37 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Oil & Gas Equipment & Services outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 50.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 2.5%. 17 of 29 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective.
+2.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+50.3%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
17/29Stocks leading S&P 500
10/29Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 50.3% over 52 weeks and 2.5% over 13 weeks. 17 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 29 beat the sector itself. SLB N.V. leads with revenue of $36,366 million, based on 19 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
30
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$306.6B
SLB N.V.
Revenue growing
16/19
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
17/29
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 30
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
TechnipFMC plc has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 85.3% evidence confidence.
Tidewater Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Tidewater Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1TechnipFMC plcFTI | 68.1/100Favorable setup85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 24.2/35 Revenue 9.9% · PAT 20.6% · OPM change 2.1 pp 95% evidence | 15.0/25 ROCE 9.8% · OPM 17.5% 76% evidence | 13.4/20 P/E 23× · PEG 0.64 65% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 4.4% · RS bench 12.7% · 1Y 84.7%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.2 + 15 + 13.4 + 15.5 = 68.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Flotek Industries, Inc.FTK | 67.9/100Favorable setup71% evidence | TURNING | 26.2/35 Revenue 24.8% · PAT 100% · OPM change 0.7 pp 83% evidence | 12.3/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 10.8% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 21.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.9/20 RS sector 24.5% · RS bench 36.5% · 1Y 116.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.2 + 12.3 + 10.5 + 18.9 = 67.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3National Energy Services Reunited Corp.NESR | 61.4/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | LEADER | 19.5/35 Revenue 8.9% · PAT -15.6% · OPM change 2 pp 83% evidence | 10.6/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence | 13.9/20 P/E 33× · PEG 0.4 65% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 27.5% · RS bench 36.5% · 1Y 209.3%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 10.6 + 13.9 + 17.4 = 61.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Cactus, Inc.WHD | 60.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -11.8 pp 45% evidence | 14.4/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 12.7% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 43.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.3/20 RS sector 9.3% · RS bench 19.7% · 1Y 70.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 14.4 + 9.6 + 18.3 = 60.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Tidewater Inc.TDW | 59.6/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.6/35 Revenue -0.9% · PAT 69.7% · OPM change -4.4 pp 83% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 18.1% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 14× · PEG 0.43 65% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench 17.6% · 1Y 57.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 12.6 + 15 + 18.4 = 59.6 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 17.6%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 6Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.SEI | 59.3/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 26.7/35 Revenue 86.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change 8.3 pp 83% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 25.8% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 63.5× · PEG 0.5 65% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -4% · RS bench 5.2% · 1Y 71.7%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.7 + 12.9 + 13 + 6.7 = 59.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -4% and the one-year return is 71.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 7Oceaneering International, Inc.OII | 58.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 45% evidence | 12.5/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 8.3% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.5/20 RS sector 16.8% · RS bench 26.2% · 1Y 91.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 12.5 + 11.5 + 18.5 = 58.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8USA Compression Partners, LPUSAC | 58.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | TURNING | 22.8/35 Revenue 12.1% · PAT 34.4% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 14.7/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 27.6% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 28× · PEG 0.66 65% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -14.7% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 11.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 14.7 + 13 + 7.5 = 58 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9LandBridge Company LLCLB | 56.6/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.6/35 Revenue 54.5% · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 62% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 57.2% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 71.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.9/20 RS sector 5.1% · RS bench 15.4% · 1Y 61.1%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 11.8 + 9.3 + 17.9 = 56.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Archrock, Inc.AROC | 53.8/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.2/35 Revenue 22.6% · PAT 60.1% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 33.8% 76% evidence | 15.0/20 P/E 18.9× · PEG 0.34 65% evidence | 2.0/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -8.1% · 1Y 28.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.2 + 15.6 + 15 + 2 = 53.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Tenaris S.A.TS | 53.0/100Mixed-positive evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue 2.3% · PAT -3.3% · OPM change -2.2 pp 95% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 12.2% · OPM 16.7% 76% evidence | 13.0/20 P/E 14.6× · PEG 0.95 65% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -3.1% · RS bench 5.2% · 1Y 61.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 17.6 + 13 + 9.8 = 53 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 12Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.KGS | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.8/35 Revenue 3.9% · PAT 32.7% · OPM change 3.8 pp 83% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 30.9% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 78.8× · PEG 1.99 65% evidence | 7.7/20 RS sector -3% · RS bench 4.4% · 1Y 75.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.8 + 11.6 + 6.7 + 7.7 = 47.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Select Water Solutions, Inc.WTTR | 47.4/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | TURNING | 15.1/35 Revenue -4.1% · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 62% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 72.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.7/20 RS sector 18.2% · RS bench 27.9% · 1Y 103.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.1 + 5.5 + 9.1 + 17.7 = 47.4 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 27.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 14NOV Inc.NOV | 46.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 17.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 45% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 71.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.2/20 RS sector -3.3% · RS bench 5.9% · 1Y 62.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.1 + 8.2 + 9.2 + 12.2 = 46.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Halliburton CompanyHAL | 46.3/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 11.0/35 Revenue 0.6% · PAT -14.2% · OPM change -0.4 pp 95% evidence | 18.0/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 12.8% 76% evidence | 11.9/20 P/E 17.7× · PEG 1.08 65% evidence | 5.4/20 RS sector -10.9% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 53.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11 + 18 + 11.9 + 5.4 = 46.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Flowco Holdings Inc.FLOC | 45.4/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.1/35 Revenue 17.7% · PAT 45.6% · OPM change -1.1 pp 83% evidence | 12.1/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 17.3% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -15.2% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y 34.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 12.1 + 10.9 + 3.3 = 45.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17Enerflex Ltd.EFXT | 44.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.3/35 Revenue 11.8% · PAT 12.2% · OPM change -1.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 11.6% 76% evidence | 6.8/20 P/E 31.3× · PEG 2.31 65% evidence | 10.1/20 RS sector 0.1% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 108.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 11 + 6.8 + 10.1 = 44.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18SLB N.V.SLB | 42.4/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | TURNING | 10.7/35 Revenue 2.5% · PAT -25.2% · OPM change -1.8 pp 95% evidence | 12.2/25 ROCE 2.8% · OPM 11.9% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 22.5× · PEG 1.89 65% evidence | 10.8/20 RS sector -4.2% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 51.9%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 12.2 + 8.7 + 10.8 = 42.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 19Innovex International, Inc.INVX | 41.9/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | TURNING | 9.6/35 Revenue 26.4% · PAT -63.6% · OPM change -18.2 pp 83% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -2% · OPM -9.1% 76% evidence | 14.9/20 P/E 32.5× · PEG 0.1 65% evidence | 12.9/20 RS sector 0.4% · RS bench 10.1% · 1Y 69%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.6 + 4.5 + 14.9 + 12.9 = 41.9 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 20Bristow Group Inc.VTOL | 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.1/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT 0.9% · OPM change -0.7 pp 83% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence | 16.1/20 P/E 12.2× · PEG 0.24 65% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -17.4% · RS bench -8.7% · 1Y 11.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 7.5 + 16.1 + 4 = 41.7 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 21RPC, Inc.RES | 37.8/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.1 pp 45% evidence | 7.9/25 ROCE 1.2% · OPM 0.6% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 64.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.6/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -7.5% · 1Y 32.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 7.9 + 9.4 + 4.6 = 37.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Weatherford International plcWFRD | 37.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.2/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 16.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -20.4% · RS bench -12.7% · 1Y 29.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.4 + 11.2 + 11.1 + 1.5 = 37.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23Baker Hughes CompanyBKR | 36.0/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.2/35 Revenue 0.4% · PAT 1.3% · OPM change -0.6 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 14.2% 76% evidence | 6.0/20 P/E 17.9× · PEG 2.86 65% evidence | 4.9/20 RS sector -15% · RS bench -6.7% · 1Y 19%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.2 + 12.9 + 6 + 4.9 = 36 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24Liberty Energy Inc.LBRT | 33.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.3 pp 45% evidence | 6.8/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 35.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.2/20 RS sector -27.2% · RS bench -21.3% · 1Y 75.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 6.8 + 9.7 + 0.2 = 33.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25Expro Group Holdings N.V.XPRO | 33.9/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 13.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.7 pp 45% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 0.9% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 82.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.3/20 RS sector -9.9% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 37%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13 + 4.8 + 8.8 + 7.3 = 33.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26ProPetro Holding Corp.PUMP | 30.9/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.6 pp 45% evidence | 4.2/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -3% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 951× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.3/20 RS sector -24.4% · RS bench -18.5% · 1Y 110.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.8 + 4.2 + 8.6 + 3.3 = 30.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 27Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.AESI | 23.8/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 4.7/35 Revenue -8.3% · PAT -391.2% · OPM change -17.4 pp 83% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE -1.6% · OPM -12.2% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 95.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.9/20 RS sector -8% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 25%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.7 + 4.5 + 8.7 + 5.9 = 23.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 28EagleRock Land, LLCEROK | 51.7/100Thin evidence · provisional21% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 18.2 pp 7% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 7.2% · OPM 40.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —6 of 6 weeks ahead 0% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 13.7 + 10 + 10 = 51.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 29WaterBridge Infrastructure LLCWBI | 47.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.9 pp 39% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 1040.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector -2.5% · RS bench 7.2% · 1Y 33.4%7 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 9.6 + 8.5 + 11.4 = 47.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 30NextDecade CorporationNEXT | 42.6/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence | BASING | 17.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -0.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector -10.1% · RS bench -1% · 1Y 7.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 5.5 + 10 + 9.2 = 42.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Showing 10 of 30 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services at +209.3%. Flotek Industries, Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +36.5%. 17 of 29 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-09-16.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Oil & Gas Equipment & Services itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
SLB N.V. has the highest Revenue among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $36,366 million. Baker Hughes Company is next at $27,725 million. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 86.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: SLB N.V. is the scale leader at $36,366 million, 31.2% ahead of Baker Hughes Company. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s growth is 86.5% from a $692 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderSLB N.V. · $36,366 million
Gap31.2% versus #2 · Baker Hughes Company
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/30 companies · 501 observations
Investor read: SLB N.V. is the scale benchmark; Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: SLB N.V.'s growth falls below Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
19/30 level · 19/30 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLB N.V. SLB | $9.0B | 5.0% | Jun 2026 |
| Baker Hughes Company BKR | $6.7B | -2.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Halliburton Company HAL | $5.7B | 3.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Tenaris S.A. TS | $3.0B | -3.9% | Jun 2026 |
| TechnipFMC plc FTI | $2.8B | 9.0% | Jun 2026 |
| NOV Inc. NOV | $2.1B | -2.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Weatherford International plc WFRD | $1.2B | -3.4% | Jun 2026 |
| Liberty Energy Inc. LBRT | $1.0B | 4.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. OII | $692M | 2.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Enerflex Ltd. EFXT | $584M | 5.8% | Mar 2026 |
| RPC, Inc. RES | $455M | 37% | Jun 2026 |
| National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR | $405M | 34% | Mar 2026 |
| Bristow Group Inc. VTOL | $389M | 11% | Mar 2026 |
| Cactus, Inc. WHD | $388M | 39% | Jun 2026 |
| Archrock, Inc. AROC | $374M | 7.8% | Mar 2026 |
| Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO | $368M | -5.9% | Jun 2026 |
| Select Water Solutions, Inc. WTTR | $366M | -2.1% | Mar 2026 |
| Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS | $346M | 4.9% | Mar 2026 |
| USA Compression Partners, LP USAC | $331M | 35% | Mar 2026 |
| Tidewater Inc. TDW | $326M | -2.1% | Mar 2026 |
| ProPetro Holding Corp. PUMP | $271M | -25% | Jun 2026 |
| Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. AESI | $266M | -11% | Mar 2026 |
| Innovex International, Inc. INVX | $239M | -0.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC | $210M | 9.4% | Mar 2026 |
| WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC WBI | $201M | 105% | Mar 2026 |
| Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI | $196M | 56% | Mar 2026 |
| Flotek Industries, Inc. FTK | $70M | 27% | Mar 2026 |
| LandBridge Company LLC LB | $51M | 16% | Mar 2026 |
| EagleRock Land, LLC EROK | $23M | 229% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
$5.1B
$5.5B
$4.8B
$5.0B
$5.4B
$5.9B
$5.7B
$6.3B
$6.6B
$6.8B
$6.4B
$7.1B
$6.9B
$7.4B
$6.4B
$6.9B
$7.0B
$7.4B
$6.6B
$6.7B
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
$115M
$130M
$146M
$170M
$184M
$188M
$228M
$306M
$288M
$275M
$274M
$290M
$293M
$272M
$280M
$274M
$264M
$261M
$388M
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
$3.9B
$4.3B
$4.3B
$5.1B
$5.4B
$5.6B
$5.7B
$5.8B
$5.8B
$5.7B
$5.8B
$5.8B
$5.7B
$5.6B
$5.4B
$5.5B
$5.6B
$5.7B
$5.4B
$5.7B
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
$168M
$177M
$183M
$180M
$190M
$203M
$231M
$226M
$215M
$310M
$325M
$310M
$330M
$323M
$323M
$333M
$346M
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
$16M
$16M
$22M
$18M
$17M
$19M
$26M
$28M
$36M
$44M
$48M
$51M
$57M
$51M
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.9B
$2.1B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.1B
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.1B
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
$5.8B
$6.2B
$6.0B
$6.8B
$7.5B
$7.9B
$7.7B
$8.1B
$8.3B
$9.0B
$8.7B
$9.1B
$9.2B
$9.3B
$8.5B
$8.5B
$8.9B
$9.7B
$8.7B
$9.0B
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
$49M
$46M
$57M
$87M
$92M
$84M
$83M
$77M
$70M
$63M
$68M
$74M
$75M
$96M
$126M
$149M
$167M
$180M
$196M
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.0B
$2.3B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.2B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.8B
Tenaris S.A. · TS
$1.8B
$2.1B
$2.4B
$2.8B
$3.0B
$3.6B
$4.1B
$4.1B
$3.2B
$3.4B
$3.4B
$3.3B
$2.9B
$2.8B
$2.9B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.0B
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
$945M
$965M
$938M
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.2B
—
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
—
—
—
10%
9.7%
12%
17%
15%
18%
19%
17%
9.3%
15%
25%
29%
41%
31%
16%
7.8%
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
—
—
—
-1.9%
5.4%
7.7%
18%
25%
24%
16%
12%
13%
4.0%
7.7%
0.1%
-3.2%
1.5%
0.3%
2.5%
-2.4%
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
—
—
—
56%
60%
45%
56%
80%
57%
46%
20%
-5.2%
1.7%
-1.1%
2.2%
-5.5%
-9.9%
-4.0%
39%
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
—
—
—
37%
39%
31%
33%
14%
8.3%
2.8%
2.2%
0.6%
-1.8%
-2.3%
-6.7%
-5.5%
-1.7%
0.8%
-0.3%
3.7%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
—
—
13%
15%
26%
26%
13%
53%
41%
37%
53%
4.2%
-0.6%
7.4%
4.9%
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.3%
19%
18%
56%
112%
132%
85%
82%
58%
16%
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
—
—
—
22%
41%
37%
27%
21%
16%
13%
9.8%
5.9%
0.3%
-1.5%
-2.4%
-1.3%
-0.7%
-1.3%
-2.4%
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
—
—
—
20%
28%
27%
30%
20%
11%
14%
13%
13%
10%
3.3%
-2.5%
-6.5%
-2.5%
5.0%
2.7%
5.0%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
—
—
88%
83%
46%
-11%
-24%
-25%
-18%
-3.9%
7.1%
52%
85%
101%
123%
88%
56%
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
—
—
—
2.9%
9.8%
11%
10%
15%
19%
23%
19%
18%
14%
14%
9.4%
9.0%
13%
6.3%
12%
9.0%
Tenaris S.A. · TS
—
—
—
83%
70%
76%
75%
46%
8.8%
-5.7%
-17%
-18%
-10.0%
-17%
-15%
-7.1%
2.2%
5.3%
6.1%
-3.9%
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
18%
19%
25%
26%
20%
17%
13%
15%
10%
7.3%
-1.5%
-12%
-14%
-13%
-3.9%
-3.4%
—
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
LandBridge Company LLC has the highest OPM among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 57.2%. EagleRock Land, LLC is next at 40.9%. EagleRock Land, LLC has the highest Margin change at +18.2 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 14 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: LandBridge Company LLC leads opm at 57.2%; EagleRock Land, LLC leads margin change at +18.2 percentage points.
LeaderLandBridge Company LLC · 57.2%
Gap39.9% versus #2 · EagleRock Land, LLC
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage29/30 companies · 501 observations
Investor read: LandBridge Company LLC sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
Margin changefastest expanders
Operating margin · company comparison
29/30 level · 29/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| LandBridge Company LLC LB | 57% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| EagleRock Land, LLC EROK | 41% | +18.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Archrock, Inc. AROC | 34% | −1.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS | 31% | +3.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| USA Compression Partners, LP USAC | 28% | −0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI | 26% | +8.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Tidewater Inc. TDW | 18% | −4.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| TechnipFMC plc FTI | 18% | +2.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC | 17% | −1.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Tenaris S.A. TS | 17% | −2.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC WBI | 15% | −0.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Baker Hughes Company BKR | 14% | −0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Halliburton Company HAL | 13% | −0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cactus, Inc. WHD | 13% | −11.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| SLB N.V. SLB | 12% | −1.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Enerflex Ltd. EFXT | 12% | −1.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Flotek Industries, Inc. FTK | 11% | +0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Weatherford International plc WFRD | 11% | −1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR | 8.9% | +2.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Bristow Group Inc. VTOL | 8.9% | −0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. OII | 8.3% | −2.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Select Water Solutions, Inc. WTTR | 4.9% | +0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| NOV Inc. NOV | 2.3% | −4.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Liberty Energy Inc. LBRT | 2.2% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO | 0.9% | −1.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| RPC, Inc. RES | 0.6% | −3.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ProPetro Holding Corp. PUMP | -3.0% | −5.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Innovex International, Inc. INVX | -9.1% | −18.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. AESI | -12% | −17.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
12%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
20%
26%
27%
26%
29%
28%
29%
32%
35%
32%
37%
43%
34%
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
7.4%
11%
5.8%
-0.5%
5.0%
11%
7.7%
8.1%
11%
12%
11%
12%
15%
15%
9.5%
15%
13%
11%
21%
14%
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
18%
20%
21%
26%
28%
26%
22%
16%
30%
29%
23%
28%
26%
26%
25%
22%
23%
23%
13%
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
11%
12%
12%
7.4%
16%
16%
17%
17%
18%
18%
17%
18%
17%
17%
13%
13%
13%
15%
13%
13%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
32%
29%
32%
32%
32%
31%
26%
27%
28%
18%
20%
22%
27%
31%
20%
26%
31%
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
20%
1.0%
209%
107%
31%
71%
-197%
11%
49%
57%
60%
61%
60%
57%
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
-3.2%
-1.0%
-1.4%
3.9%
2.9%
7.8%
6.4%
8.6%
8.4%
6.9%
7.5%
14%
8.9%
9.0%
7.2%
6.5%
4.9%
4.0%
2.3%
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
13%
13%
12%
14%
16%
16%
15%
17%
18%
16%
16%
16%
17%
15%
13%
14%
12%
10%
12%
12%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
4.1%
3.8%
13%
12%
15%
12%
18%
20%
14%
15%
15%
16%
7.0%
27%
18%
24%
23%
22%
26%
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
2.3%
-2.4%
0.7%
4.5%
4.7%
1.7%
3.0%
8.0%
7.8%
6.7%
7.8%
13%
12%
9.1%
12%
15%
15%
8.8%
14%
18%
Tenaris S.A. · TS
13%
14%
21%
24%
27%
29%
33%
31%
27%
23%
24%
15%
18%
17%
19%
19%
20%
18%
19%
17%
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
7.5%
3.4%
1.9%
9.8%
11%
14%
16%
16%
17%
16%
17%
19%
17%
15%
12%
20%
14%
15%
11%
—
Margin change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
—
—
—
−1.8 pp
+2.7 pp
+2.0 pp
+7.0 pp
+10.8 pp
+11.7 pp
+10.7 pp
+9.2 pp
+2.0 pp
+2.2 pp
+6.2 pp
+5.8 pp
+3.8 pp
+8.1 pp
+10.2 pp
−1.3 pp
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
—
—
—
−4.3 pp
−2.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+8.6 pp
+5.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+2.9 pp
+4.1 pp
+4.6 pp
+3.4 pp
−1.1 pp
+2.6 pp
−2.9 pp
−4.1 pp
+11.1 pp
−0.6 pp
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
—
—
—
+10.1 pp
+9.8 pp
+5.9 pp
+0.6 pp
−10.1 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+11.6 pp
−4.2 pp
−2.7 pp
+1.7 pp
−5.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−11.8 pp
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
—
—
—
−4.3 pp
+4.8 pp
+4.2 pp
+5.3 pp
+10.0 pp
+2.1 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
−1.8 pp
−4.2 pp
−4.5 pp
−4.2 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
—
—
−0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
−5.5 pp
−5.1 pp
−3.8 pp
−13.0 pp
−6.0 pp
−4.6 pp
−0.8 pp
+13.4 pp
−0.5 pp
+3.8 pp
+3.8 pp
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+11.3 pp
+70.1 pp
−406.0 pp
−96.1 pp
+18.3 pp
−14.1 pp
+257.4 pp
+49.6 pp
+10.6 pp
+0.2 pp
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
—
—
—
+3.1 pp
+6.1 pp
+8.8 pp
+7.8 pp
+4.7 pp
+5.5 pp
−0.9 pp
+1.1 pp
+5.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−7.6 pp
−4.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−4.9 pp
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
—
—
—
+2.4 pp
+2.7 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.4 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.2 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.4 pp
−5.0 pp
−4.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.8 pp
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
—
—
+11.0 pp
+8.2 pp
+5.0 pp
+8.5 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.6 pp
−3.3 pp
−4.4 pp
−7.4 pp
+12.1 pp
+2.8 pp
+7.8 pp
+15.7 pp
−4.5 pp
+8.3 pp
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
—
—
—
+2.6 pp
+2.4 pp
+4.1 pp
+2.3 pp
+3.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+5.0 pp
+4.8 pp
+5.3 pp
+4.4 pp
+2.4 pp
+3.9 pp
+2.1 pp
+3.1 pp
−0.3 pp
+2.4 pp
+2.1 pp
Tenaris S.A. · TS
—
—
—
+13.8 pp
+13.8 pp
+15.3 pp
+12.3 pp
+7.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−6.3 pp
−9.2 pp
−16.0 pp
−8.4 pp
−6.1 pp
−4.7 pp
+3.5 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.2 pp
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
+7.0 pp
+3.3 pp
+10.6 pp
+13.7 pp
+6.0 pp
+5.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.6 pp
+3.0 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−5.3 pp
+0.9 pp
−2.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−1.2 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
SLB N.V. has the highest Net profit among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at $3,150 million. Baker Hughes Company is next at $3,124 million. Flotek Industries, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: SLB N.V. leads with $3,150 million of TTM profit, 0.8% above Baker Hughes Company. Flotek Industries, Inc. shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (114.3% uncapped) growth from a $30 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderSLB N.V. · $3,150 million
Gap0.8% versus #2 · Baker Hughes Company
Persistence1/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage19/30 companies · 520 observations
Investor read: SLB N.V. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
19/30 level · 17/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLB N.V. SLB | $815M | -22% | Jun 2026 |
| Baker Hughes Company BKR | $682M | -4.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Halliburton Company HAL | $538M | 12% | Jun 2026 |
| Tenaris S.A. TS | $492M | -9.2% | Jun 2026 |
| TechnipFMC plc FTI | $362M | 35% | Jun 2026 |
| Weatherford International plc WFRD | $109M | 27% | Jun 2026 |
| Archrock, Inc. AROC | $74M | 4.2% | Mar 2026 |
| Enerflex Ltd. EFXT | $43M | 79% | Mar 2026 |
| Cactus, Inc. WHD | $40M | -26% | Jun 2026 |
| USA Compression Partners, LP USAC | $38M | 81% | Mar 2026 |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. OII | $36M | -28% | Jun 2026 |
| Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI | $32M | 146% | Mar 2026 |
| Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC | $27M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
| National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR | $24M | 140% | Mar 2026 |
| Liberty Energy Inc. LBRT | $23M | 15% | Jun 2026 |
| NOV Inc. NOV | $20M | -73% | Jun 2026 |
| LandBridge Company LLC LB | $18M | 20% | Mar 2026 |
| Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS | $18M | -42% | Mar 2026 |
| Bristow Group Inc. VTOL | $13M | -52% | Mar 2026 |
| WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC WBI | $10M | 400% | Mar 2026 |
| Tidewater Inc. TDW | $6M | -86% | Mar 2026 |
| Flotek Industries, Inc. FTK | $5M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
| EagleRock Land, LLC EROK | $3M | — | Mar 2026 |
| RPC, Inc. RES | $1M | -92% | Jun 2026 |
| Select Water Solutions, Inc. WTTR | $0M | -600% | Mar 2026 |
| Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO | $-1M | -107% | Jun 2026 |
| ProPetro Holding Corp. PUMP | $-4M | -140% | Jun 2026 |
| Innovex International, Inc. INVX | $-17M | -213% | Mar 2026 |
| Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. AESI | $-47M | -4,800% | Mar 2026 |
| NextDecade Corporation NEXT | $-195M | -85% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
$9M
$6M
$2M
$17M
$15M
$10M
$16M
$25M
$31M
$33M
$41M
$34M
$38M
$60M
$71M
$63M
$71M
$117M
$74M
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
$16M
$336M
$80M
$-837M
$-9M
$188M
$581M
$414M
$524M
$451M
$463M
$581M
$774M
$1.2B
$409M
$711M
$617M
$887M
$938M
$682M
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
$17M
$20M
$27M
$36M
$42M
$41M
$52M
$32M
$68M
$62M
$50M
$63M
$62M
$57M
$54M
$49M
$50M
$48M
$40M
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
$240M
$827M
$264M
$117M
$549M
$665M
$655M
$616M
$724M
$667M
$609M
$713M
$580M
$614M
$203M
$480M
$20M
$589M
$464M
$538M
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
$28M
$9M
$46M
$2M
$-12M
$18M
$22M
$-7M
$30M
$7M
$-6M
$20M
$31M
$40M
$-14M
$25M
$18M
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
$2M
$-1M
$45M
$17M
$3M
$11M
$-58M
$-3M
$8M
$15M
$18M
$20M
$18M
$18M
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
$-65M
$-43M
$-49M
$70M
$35M
$99M
$125M
$157M
$108M
$595M
$121M
$223M
$130M
$161M
$74M
$114M
$44M
$-81M
$20M
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
$562M
$611M
$520M
$970M
$919M
$1.1B
$944M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$829M
$1.0B
$774M
$800M
$761M
$815M
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
$1M
$1M
$6M
$8M
$12M
$8M
$12M
$12M
$8M
$7M
$7M
$10M
$-2M
$14M
$13M
$24M
$25M
$-4M
$32M
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
$-39M
$-134M
$-34M
$8M
$11M
$-21M
$8M
$-96M
$94M
$13M
$161M
$186M
$278M
$245M
$143M
$268M
$311M
$193M
$260M
$362M
Tenaris S.A. · TS
$326M
$336M
$503M
$634M
$608M
$803M
$1.1B
$1.1B
$547M
$1.1B
$750M
$348M
$459M
$519M
$518M
$542M
$453M
$461M
$564M
$492M
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
$-89M
$-157M
$-74M
$12M
$37M
$76M
$81M
$90M
$131M
$147M
$123M
$137M
$166M
$124M
$86M
$145M
$87M
$139M
$109M
—
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
—
—
—
89%
67%
67%
700%
47%
107%
230%
156%
36%
23%
82%
73%
85%
87%
95%
4.2%
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
—
—
—
—
-156%
-44%
626%
—
—
140%
-20%
40%
48%
164%
-12%
22%
-20%
-26%
129%
-4.1%
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
—
—
—
140%
147%
105%
93%
-11%
62%
51%
-3.9%
97%
-8.8%
-8.1%
8.0%
-22%
-19%
-16%
-26%
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
—
—
—
-49%
129%
-20%
148%
427%
32%
0.3%
-7.0%
16%
-20%
-8.0%
-67%
-33%
-97%
-4.1%
129%
12%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
—
—
-143%
100%
-52%
-450%
—
-61%
-127%
—
3.3%
471%
—
25%
-42%
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
50%
—
-229%
-118%
167%
36%
—
—
125%
20%
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
124%
209%
501%
-3.2%
42%
20%
-73%
-39%
-49%
-66%
-150%
-73%
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
—
—
—
119%
64%
77%
82%
7.9%
24%
6.1%
16%
9.4%
7.2%
-2.7%
-25%
-8.5%
-36%
-28%
-8.2%
-22%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
—
—
1,100%
700%
100%
50%
-33%
-13%
-42%
-17%
-125%
100%
86%
140%
—
-129%
146%
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-1,300%
755%
—
1,913%
—
196%
1,785%
-11%
44%
12%
-21%
82%
35%
Tenaris S.A. · TS
—
—
—
119%
87%
139%
124%
79%
-10%
43%
-34%
-69%
-16%
-55%
-31%
56%
-1.3%
-11%
8.9%
-9.2%
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
650%
254%
93%
52%
52%
27%
-16%
-30%
5.8%
-48%
12%
27%
—
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
Halliburton Company has the highest ROCE among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 14.9%. Tenaris S.A. is next at 12.2%. TechnipFMC plc has the highest ROCE change at +1.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 30 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Halliburton Company leads ROCE at 14.9%, 2.7 percentage points above Tenaris S.A.. TechnipFMC plc has the strongest latest improvement at +1.8 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderHalliburton Company · 14.9%
Gap22.1% versus #2 · Tenaris S.A.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage30/30 companies · 529 observations
Investor read: Halliburton Company sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
ROCE changefastest improvers
Return on capital · company comparison
30/30 level · 29/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halliburton Company HAL | 15% | −2.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Tenaris S.A. TS | 12% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| TechnipFMC plc FTI | 9.8% | +1.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| EagleRock Land, LLC EROK | 7.2% | — | Mar 2026 |
| Flotek Industries, Inc. FTK | 5.3% | +0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. OII | 4.9% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Cactus, Inc. WHD | 4.5% | +0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Enerflex Ltd. EFXT | 3.7% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Archrock, Inc. AROC | 3.2% | −0.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Tidewater Inc. TDW | 3.1% | −1.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Baker Hughes Company BKR | 3.0% | −1.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| USA Compression Partners, LP USAC | 3.0% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Weatherford International plc WFRD | 2.9% | −3.8 pp | Jun 2026 |
| SLB N.V. SLB | 2.8% | −0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. SEI | 2.8% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| National Energy Services Reunited Corp. NESR | 2.8% | +1.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. KGS | 2.6% | +0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| LandBridge Company LLC LB | 2.5% | −2.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| NOV Inc. NOV | 2.2% | +0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Flowco Holdings Inc. FLOC | 2.2% | −2.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Bristow Group Inc. VTOL | 1.8% | −0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC WBI | 1.3% | +0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Select Water Solutions, Inc. WTTR | 1.3% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| RPC, Inc. RES | 1.2% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Expro Group Holdings N.V. XPRO | 0.6% | −1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Liberty Energy Inc. LBRT | 0.4% | −1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| ProPetro Holding Corp. PUMP | -0.2% | +0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| NextDecade Corporation NEXT | -0.5% | +0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. AESI | -1.6% | −2.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Innovex International, Inc. INVX | -2.0% | −4.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 30 companies with a series here. The remaining 18 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.9%
2.5%
2.7%
2.7%
3.2%
2.9%
2.7%
3.4%
3.9%
3.5%
3.6%
4.1%
3.2%
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
1.4%
2.1%
1.1%
-0.1%
1.1%
2.7%
1.8%
2.1%
3.0%
3.4%
2.9%
3.6%
4.4%
4.5%
2.5%
4.1%
3.4%
3.1%
4.3%
3.0%
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
2.5%
3.1%
3.5%
4.8%
5.6%
5.1%
4.4%
4.3%
7.8%
6.7%
4.6%
5.8%
5.5%
4.8%
4.6%
3.9%
3.9%
3.7%
2.7%
4.5%
Halliburton Company · HAL
8.7%
9.7%
11%
10%
13%
15%
17%
20%
21%
21%
21%
21%
20%
20%
19%
17%
16%
15%
15%
15%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
0.0%
0.0%
—
—
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
4.1%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
1.5%
1.8%
1.9%
2.5%
2.4%
1.6%
2.2%
2.6%
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
0.0%
1.2%
—
—
7.6%
2.1%
—
—
0.7%
2.8%
5.0%
5.4%
3.6%
2.9%
2.5%
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
-0.5%
-0.2%
-0.3%
0.9%
0.7%
2.1%
1.6%
2.3%
2.3%
1.9%
1.9%
3.7%
2.2%
2.3%
1.7%
1.6%
1.2%
1.0%
0.5%
2.2%
SLB N.V. · SLB
2.4%
2.6%
2.2%
3.0%
3.7%
4.2%
3.8%
4.1%
4.4%
4.5%
4.2%
4.2%
4.4%
4.0%
3.3%
3.3%
2.7%
2.6%
2.8%
2.8%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
0.5%
0.4%
1.9%
2.7%
3.6%
2.6%
3.7%
3.9%
2.4%
2.2%
2.4%
2.9%
0.8%
3.4%
3.0%
4.0%
3.2%
2.6%
2.8%
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
0.5%
-0.5%
0.2%
1.2%
1.4%
0.5%
0.9%
2.9%
3.1%
2.6%
3.1%
6.2%
5.6%
4.2%
5.3%
8.0%
7.8%
4.4%
7.0%
9.8%
Tenaris S.A. · TS
3.7%
5.7%
8.7%
12%
16%
20%
24%
27%
26%
24%
20%
17%
14%
13%
11%
12%
12%
13%
13%
12%
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
1.8%
0.9%
0.5%
2.9%
3.5%
5.1%
5.6%
6.2%
6.7%
6.7%
7.2%
8.0%
7.3%
5.9%
4.2%
6.7%
5.0%
5.6%
3.4%
2.9%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 29 companies with a series here. The remaining 17 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
—
—
—
—
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+1.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.7 pp
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
—
—
—
—
−0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.4 pp
+1.8 pp
−1.1 pp
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
—
—
—
—
+3.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.5 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.9 pp
0.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
Halliburton Company · HAL
—
—
—
—
+4.1 pp
+5.0 pp
+6.2 pp
+9.7 pp
+7.9 pp
+6.7 pp
+4.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.0 pp
−4.4 pp
−4.7 pp
−3.7 pp
−2.1 pp
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
+2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
—
—
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+7.6 pp
+0.9 pp
—
—
−6.9 pp
+0.7 pp
—
—
+2.9 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.5 pp
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
—
—
—
—
+1.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−2.1 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.6 pp
SLB N.V. · SLB
—
—
—
—
+1.3 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
—
—
+3.1 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.6 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.1 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.2 pp
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
—
—
—
—
+0.9 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+2.1 pp
+2.2 pp
+3.3 pp
+2.5 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.2 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.2 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.8 pp
Tenaris S.A. · TS
—
—
—
—
+12.2 pp
+14.7 pp
+15.6 pp
+14.7 pp
+10.5 pp
+3.2 pp
−4.2 pp
−10.4 pp
−12.0 pp
−10.5 pp
−8.7 pp
−4.4 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.2 pp
0.0 pp
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
—
+1.7 pp
+4.2 pp
+5.1 pp
+3.3 pp
+3.2 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.8 pp
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies compared here, at 0.1×. Bristow Group Inc. is next at 0.24×. Oceaneering International, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 11.6×, so level and change sit with different companies. 14 of 30 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.1×, 58.3% below Bristow Group Inc.. Only 14 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderInnovex International, Inc. · 0.1×
Gap58.3% versus #2 · Bristow Group Inc.
Persistence0/7 recent comparable periods
Coverage14/30 companies · 56 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
Valuation · company comparison
14/30 level · 28/30 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 19 companies with a series here. The remaining 7 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.5
0.4
—
—
0.3
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.3
—
0.2
0.6
—
2.9
—
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.4
1.0
2.6
1.4
—
—
—
—
—
Halliburton Company · HAL
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
—
0.3
—
0.4
1.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
—
—
2.6
—
3.9
—
0.9
2.0
—
Oceaneering International, Inc. · OII
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
SLB N.V. · SLB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.5
0.8
1.5
1.3
1.8
1.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
1.0
0.7
0.6
Tenaris S.A. · TS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.0
—
Tidewater Inc. · TDW
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
0.4
—
—
—
—
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.2
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
P/E · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 28 companies with a series here. The remaining 16 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Archrock, Inc. · AROC
45.8
41.6
54.3
37.6
24.7
32.1
25.7
23.8
23.8
23.0
23.7
22.7
22.2
23.7
22.2
18.8
17.5
14.2
18.9
—
Baker Hughes Company · BKR
107.5
—
145.1
—
—
—
—
28.0
21.3
17.9
18.7
17.9
16.2
13.8
15.0
12.5
16.8
17.5
19.5
17.9
Cactus, Inc. · WHD
58.0
45.9
57.9
32.5
25.0
27.9
19.8
21.0
21.7
17.7
20.0
18.3
21.2
21.1
16.3
16.5
15.7
19.0
44.7
43.8
Halliburton Company · HAL
48.4
14.1
22.0
19.8
12.8
22.7
14.6
12.1
13.8
12.3
13.5
11.1
10.1
9.6
10.5
9.4
16.0
18.5
21.1
17.7
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · KGS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18.0
44.7
69.2
25.8
33.2
61.7
72.9
70.4
38.1
46.2
42.0
78.8
—
LandBridge Company LLC · LB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
966.9
475.2
265.2
164.6
52.1
71.2
—
NOV Inc. · NOV
—
—
—
—
539.3
53.6
22.0
15.3
16.6
8.1
7.8
7.1
5.9
9.1
10.2
10.2
13.3
40.1
78.4
71.4
SLB N.V. · SLB
25.3
22.7
28.1
19.4
17.3
22.4
18.3
17.9
20.2
17.9
18.2
15.4
13.5
12.3
14.2
11.6
13.3
16.3
22.4
22.5
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · SEI
—
—
102.6
35.1
18.7
15.5
11.2
9.9
13.7
10.2
12.8
13.4
29.0
57.6
44.4
48.0
42.5
69.7
63.5
—
TechnipFMC plc · FTI
26.9
197.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
167.8
53.4
24.0
17.3
15.2
16.7
16.3
17.6
19.4
26.4
23.0
Tenaris S.A. · TS
14.9
11.2
12.1
8.2
7.3
8.1
5.3
4.8
5.2
5.2
6.5
6.3
6.6
10.0
11.6
9.9
9.3
10.2
15.1
14.6
Weatherford International plc · WFRD
—
—
—
—
—
141.4
24.4
19.1
19.1
17.3
18.7
18.2
11.9
10.6
8.6
7.8
12.4
13.2
14.8
16.1
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 30 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-09-16.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-09-16 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 30 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-09-16. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 50.3% over 52 weeks and 2.5% over 13 weeks. 17 of 29 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 29 beat the sector itself.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is largest by revenue?
SLB N.V. leads with revenue of $36,366 million, based on 19 of 30 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is growing fastest?
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 86.5%, across 19 of 30 comparable companies.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
TechnipFMC plc ranks first at 68.1/100 with 85.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Innovex International, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.1, among 14 of 30 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Oil & Gas Equipment & Services comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company is the biggest?
SLB N.V. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $36,366 million, ahead of Baker Hughes Company at $27,725 million. That covers 19 of 30 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company has the best profit margins?
LandBridge Company LLC has the highest operating margin at 57.2%, from 29 of 30 comparable companies. EagleRock Land, LLC shows the biggest recent improvement, at +18.2 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company makes the most profit?
SLB N.V. earns the most, at $3,150 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 19 of 30 comparable companies. Flotek Industries, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at the ≥100% scoring cap, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company earns the highest return on capital?
Halliburton Company leads on return on capital employed at 14.9%, across 30 of 30 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Innovex International, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.1×. Only 14 of 30 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector beating the market?
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services has outperformed S&P 500 by 50.3% over the last 52 weeks and 2.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 17 of 29 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stock has the strongest price momentum?
Flotek Industries, Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Oil & Gas Equipment & Services company scores highest for research priority?
TechnipFMC plc scores 68.1 out of 100 with 85.3% evidence confidence, from 24.2 points on growth and earnings, 15 on capital efficiency, 13.4 on valuation and 15.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 30 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector?
The 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies on this page carry $306,631 million of combined market value. SLB N.V. is the largest at $77,621 million, about 25% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-09-16.
What is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 30 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies on this page is 32.5×, measured on the 28 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-09-16.
How is the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sector performing?
17 of the 29 covered Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 50.3% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-09-16.
How many Oil & Gas Equipment & Services stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 30 listed Oil & Gas Equipment & Services companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.
Not SEBI Registered !! Not Investment advice !!