Tower Semiconductor Ltd.
TSEMTower Semiconductor Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +436.6% in a year while annual EPS moved +4.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (59 weeks in). Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +75.0% year on year, and 161% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. trades at $240, in a confirmed uptrend and 59 weeks into that stage. That is +41.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 80% of a 52-week range of $47 to $287. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 59 of stage 2. At $240 it trades +41.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 80% of its 52-week range ($47–$287).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +1,821% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 1 straight week — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. trades at 94.7× P/E, against too little history to rank. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 94.7× is against too little history to rank. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +4.9% against a +436.6% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +86.9%/yr price move, ~−4.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+91.4 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Improving Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. reads as improving on its fundamental arc. Improving — profit growth bottomed 5 quarters ago at −61.5% and has held its recovery at +25.0%, ROCE holding at 7.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: a sustained climb off the trough is the setup this page is built to catch — the question moves to what you pay for it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +9.0% | −2.2% | — | — |
| Profit | +4.8% | −6.6% | — | — |
| EPS | +4.9% | −6.7% | — | — |
| Stock price | +436.6% | +86.9% | +52.2% | +31.8% |
4-Factor Sector Score
47.8/100 — rank 15 of 27 in Semiconductors · 66% evidence confidence
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. scores 47.8 out of 100 against the 27 companies it is compared with in Semiconductors, ranking 15. Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 45.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.4 + 11.7 + 6.1 + 13.6 = 47.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. reported $0.4 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +13.9% year on year. That is the 7th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 1.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.6 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.6 B (+9.0% on the year), capping 4 years at 1.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.4 B, +13.9% year on year — the 7th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +10.1% growth against the decade's 1.0% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +10.2% over the last 4 quarters against +7.6%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +25.0% vs −27.8%/yr — accelerating.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s operating margin is 14.6% in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 11.3% to 38.7%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 14.6%, +6.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 11.3%–38.7%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +6.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +7.4 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +75.0% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.2 B. The 4-year compound rate is 10.0%. That is 17.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +75.0% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.2 B (+4.8%), and the 4-year compound rate is 10.0%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +13.9% and the margin +6.3 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +29.6% vs revenue +10.1%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra dollar of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 161% of Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.4 B of operating cash against $0.2 B of profit. After $0.4 B of capital spending, $−0.1 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.4 B against reported profit of $0.2 B, leaving free cash of $−0.1 B after $0.4 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 161% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 21.2% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. earns a ROE of 8% in FY25. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by +5.6 percentage points, so growth here adds value rather than only size. The wiring behind it is 14.0% net margin on 0.47× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 8%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 14.0% net margin × 0.47× asset turns × 1.14× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 7.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 14.8% − 9.2% = a +5.6 pp spread. The 9.2% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. A spread this wide means every dollar reinvested creates more than a dollar of value — the engine compounds.
Dividend
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. carries total debt of $0.2 B against shareholder equity of $3.0 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.05 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.19 in FY21 to 0.06 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of $0.2 B against shareholder equity of $3.0 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.05. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.19 (FY21) to 0.06 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Tower Semiconductor Ltd., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.4 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Micron Technology, Inc.MU | 74.0/100Favorable setup71% evidence | LEADER | 28.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 57.1 pp 83% evidence | 19.5/25 ROCE 36.4% · OPM 80.4% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 20.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.6/20 RS sector 49.3% · RS bench 78.5% · 1Y 650.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28.4 + 19.5 + 11.5 + 14.6 = 74 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2NVIDIA CorporationNVDA | 72.3/100Favorable setup81% evidence | ASLEEP | 28.0/35 Revenue 70.7% · PAT 100% · OPM change 16.5 pp 83% evidence | 21.3/25 ROCE 34.1% · OPM 65.6% 76% evidence | 15.1/20 P/E 31.9× · PEG 0.79 65% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -27.2% · RS bench 0.2% · 1Y 16%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 28 + 21.3 + 15.1 + 7.9 = 72.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Credo Technology Group Holding LtdCRDO | 64.9/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 26.2/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 15.8 pp 83% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 11.1% · OPM 35.7% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 73.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.8/20 RS sector -0.5% · RS bench 32.5% · 1Y 97.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 26.2 + 14.1 + 9.8 + 14.8 = 64.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Silicon Motion Technology CorporationSIMO | 63.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 9.4 pp 39% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 10.3% · OPM 15.3% 76% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 39.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.7/20 RS sector 29.7% · RS bench 60.2% · 1Y 251.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 15.6 + 10.7 + 14.7 = 63.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Astera Labs, Inc.ALAB | 62.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 22.8/35 Revenue 100% · PAT 100% · OPM change 13 pp 53% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 4.8% · OPM 20.1% 57% evidence | 9.7/20 P/E 74.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.4/20 RS sector 19.9% · RS bench 56.4% · 1Y 101.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.8 + 11.3 + 9.7 + 18.4 = 62.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.AMD | 58.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 20.0/35 Revenue 35% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.6 pp 53% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 14.4% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 66× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.5/20 RS sector 28.7% · RS bench 62.4% · 1Y 200.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20 + 10.9 + 10 + 17.5 = 58.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Texas Instruments IncorporatedTXN | 57.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 19.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5 pp 39% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 37.5% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 45.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.4/20 RS sector -12.4% · RS bench 16.3% · 1Y 51.5%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 15.6 + 10.5 + 11.4 = 57.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Lattice Semiconductor CorporationLSCC | 55.2/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 20.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 11.5 pp 39% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 3.4% · OPM 15.3% 76% evidence | 8.6/20 P/E 678.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 0.2% · RS bench 30.6% · 1Y 124.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.7 + 11.6 + 8.6 + 14.3 = 55.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Broadcom Inc.AVGO | 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.6/35 Revenue 32.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change 9.8 pp 83% evidence | 15.3/25 ROCE 7.1% · OPM 48.6% 76% evidence | 5.7/20 P/E 70.2× · PEG 5.05 65% evidence | 9.3/20 RS sector -23.6% · RS bench 4.9% · 1Y 37.1%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.6 + 15.3 + 5.7 + 9.3 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Analog Devices, Inc.ADI | 54.9/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.6/35 Revenue 29.8% · PAT 81% · OPM change 12.4 pp 83% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 3.1% · OPM 38.1% 76% evidence | 11.8/20 P/E 58.5× · PEG 1.32 65% evidence | 8.6/20 RS sector -18.5% · RS bench 8.7% · 1Y 69.8%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.6 + 13.9 + 11.8 + 8.6 = 54.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.MPWR | 51.4/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 39% evidence | 15.8/25 ROCE 7.8% · OPM 30% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 84.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -21.1% · RS bench 4.9% · 1Y 66%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 15.8 + 9.4 + 6.1 = 51.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Marvell Technology, Inc.MRVL | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | LEADER | 14.5/35 Revenue 34.1% · PAT — · OPM change -0.3 pp 62% evidence | 7.2/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 10.3/20 P/E 56.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.7/20 RS sector 27.7% · RS bench 58.7% · 1Y 182.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 7.2 + 10.3 + 18.7 = 50.7 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 58.7%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 13NXP Semiconductors N.V.NXPI | 49.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 21.8 pp 39% evidence | 15.1/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 47.3% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 23.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.8/20 RS sector -33.7% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y 14.6%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 15.1 + 11.2 + 2.8 = 49.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Arm Holdings plcARM | 48.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.6 pp 39% evidence | 9.1/25 ROCE 1% · OPM 29.4% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 365.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.4/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 38.8% · 1Y 102.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 9.1 + 8.7 + 17.4 = 48.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Tower Semiconductor Ltd.this pageTSEM | 47.8/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | TURNING | 16.4/35 Revenue 10.6% · PAT 20.5% · OPM change 6.4 pp 53% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 15.6% 57% evidence | 6.1/20 P/E 81.6× · PEG 4.35 65% evidence | 13.6/20 RS sector 16.1% · RS bench 45.1% · 1Y 397%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.4 + 11.7 + 6.1 + 13.6 = 47.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 45.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 16Microchip Technology IncorporatedMCHP | 47.2/100Mixed-negative evidence61% evidence | FADING | 18.6/35 Revenue 7.1% · PAT — · OPM change 26.9 pp 40% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 1.6% · OPM 16.6% 57% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 293.7× · PEG 0.78 65% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -26.4% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 30.4%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 9.9 + 13.7 + 5 = 47.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17ON Semiconductor CorporationON | 43.3/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | FADING | 21.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 36.2 pp 32% evidence | 5.4/25 ROCE -0.5% · OPM -3.5% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 44.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.7/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench 4.5% · 1Y 69.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.6 + 5.4 + 10.6 + 5.7 = 43.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 18STMicroelectronics N.V.STM | 42.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 17.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.2 pp 39% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 2.3% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 139× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.0/20 RS sector -0.8% · RS bench 25.3% · 1Y 115.4%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.6 + 6 + 9.1 + 10 = 42.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19SiTime CorporationSITM | 42.5/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | FADING | 20.2/35 Revenue 65.2% · PAT — · OPM change 35.7 pp 40% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -1.2% · OPM -10.9% 57% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 98.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -2.7% · RS bench 24.4% · 1Y 192.3%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.2 + 5.5 + 9.3 + 7.5 = 42.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Qorvo, Inc.QRVO | 41.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 16.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.7 pp 39% evidence | 7.1/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 3.9% 76% evidence | 11.4/20 P/E 21.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -29.9% · RS bench -2.8% · 1Y 7.9%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.2 + 7.1 + 11.4 + 7.2 = 41.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Intel CorporationINTC | 41.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | FADING | 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -20.7 pp 39% evidence | 4.7/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM -23.1% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 3550× · PEG — 15% evidence | 12.5/20 RS sector 23.8% · RS bench 51.4% · 1Y 406%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 4.7 + 8.5 + 12.5 = 41.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 22Rambus Inc.RMBS | 40.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 14.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.6 pp 39% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 34.3% 76% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 60.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.1/20 RS sector -36.1% · RS bench -13.7% · 1Y 38%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 14.3 + 10.1 + 1.1 = 40 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 23MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.MTSI | 39.4/100Mixed-negative evidence66% evidence | FADING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.8 pp 39% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence | 4.2/20 P/E 103.2× · PEG 5.61 65% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -14.7% · RS bench 9.6% · 1Y 126%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.6 + 4.2 + 6.3 = 39.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 24QUALCOMM IncorporatedQCOM | 38.5/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -6.6 pp 39% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 21.8% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 21.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.5/20 RS sector -36.4% · RS bench -12.8% · 1Y 10.2%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 13.1 + 11.3 + 1.5 = 38.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 25GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.GFS | 38.5/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | FADING | 14.9/35 Revenue 0.8% · PAT — · OPM change 1.5 pp 40% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 11% 57% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 32× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.1/20 RS sector -24.6% · RS bench -2.3% · 1Y 61.1%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.9 + 9.6 + 10.9 + 3.1 = 38.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 26Semtech CorporationSMTC | 38.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | FADING | 10.7/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT — · OPM change -5.4 pp 62% evidence | 7.3/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 8.9% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 218.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.3/20 RS sector -1.7% · RS bench 26.7% · 1Y 154%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.7 + 7.3 + 9 + 11.3 = 38.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 27Skyworks Solutions, Inc.SWKS | 38.0/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7 pp 39% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 4.5% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 32.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.1/20 RS sector -35.7% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y -6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.6 + 7.5 + 10.8 + 6.1 = 38 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s stock price today?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. trades at $240, +436.6% over the past year. The company is valued at $27.0 B. The stock sits at 80% of its 52-week range of $47–$287, +41.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 59 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s latest quarterly results?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. reported revenue of $0.4 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 13.9% and profit rose 75.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.57. The operating margin was 14.6%, 6.3 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s revenue?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. reported revenue of $0.4 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +13.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.6 B (+9.0%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 1.0% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s profit?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +75.0% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.2 B. The operating margin ran 14.6% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s market cap?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s market capitalisation is $27.0 B at a stock price of $240. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Tower Semiconductor Ltd. pay a dividend?
No — Tower Semiconductor Ltd. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 12 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. growing?
Yes — Tower Semiconductor Ltd. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +13.9% year on year, profit +75.0%, and the margin +6.3 pp at 14.6%. The 4-year compound rates are 1.0% (revenue) and 10.0% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. performing?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. is in a confirmed uptrend, 59 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 13.9% and profit rose 75.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. in?
Improving — profit growth bottomed 5 quarters ago at −61.5% and has held its recovery at +25.0%, ROCE holding at 7.1%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +10.2% latest, profit growth +25.0% latest, eps growth +18.8% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 59 of stage 2), trading +41.3% versus its 200-day average and at 80% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Tower Semiconductor Ltd. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 1 straight week, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +1,821% against the S&P 500's +263% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Tower Semiconductor Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $240, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 59 weeks in. Direction is not something this site claims to know. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Tower Semiconductor Ltd. have too much debt?
No — Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s debt-to-equity is 0.05. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s capex?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.4 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s cash flow?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. generated $0.4 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.1 B of free cash flow after $0.4 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.2 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 161% of Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.4 B against reported profit of $0.2 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. in its business cycle?
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s FY25 operating margin was 12.1%, against a 5-year band of 11.3%–38.7%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 14.6%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Tower Semiconductor Ltd. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +436.6% in a year while annual EPS moved +4.9% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Tower Semiconductor Ltd. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Tower Semiconductor Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.